正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

One in six people might be narcissistic. Dr. Ramani Durvasula says while full-blown Narcissistic Personality Disorder is around 1-6%, the broader narcissistic traits that actually affect others sit closer to 15-18%, especially in big cities and certain industries. She also points out that many narcissists dramatically overestimate their own... show more

Camus

453,194 subscribers

16,196 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Narcissistic personality disorder in a nutshell, according to Dr. Ramani Durvasula: It’s a stable pattern of selfishness and arrogance. Key traits: grandiosity, entitlement, living in a fantasy world, and putting your own needs above everyone else’s. The core: “I am more important than you, and your needs don’t matter.” Narcissistic traits are estimated to affect 1-6% of the general population, but subclinical levels are much more common (up to 15-18% in some estimates), with higher rates in certain industries and urban areas, contributing to relational difficulties and the “narcissism epidemic” discussed in psychological literature.

Narcissistic personality disorder in a nutshell, according to Dr. Ramani Durvasula: It’s a stable pattern of selfishness and arrogance. Key traits: grandiosity, entitlement, living in a fantasy world, and putting your own needs above everyone else’s. The core: “I am more important than you, and your needs don’t matter.” Narcissistic traits are estimated to affect 1-6% of the general population, but subclinical levels are much more common (up to 15-18% in some estimates), with higher rates in certain industries and urban areas, contributing to relational difficulties and the “narcissism epidemic” discussed in psychological literature.

Camus

73,017 次观看 • 1 个月前

Dr. Ramani Durvasula unleashes truth on narcissistic abuse: “I don't forgive them. I will never forgive them. They took away my safety. How the hell do you forgive that? I don't. And I sleep fine at night.” Healing isn’t forced forgiveness — it’s becoming your authentic self, even if that self says “no forgiveness.” 0:55 clip — brutal honesty 👇 Do you think forgiveness is required for healing from narcissists? Or is refusing it a valid path to peace?

Dr. Ramani Durvasula unleashes truth on narcissistic abuse: “I don't forgive them. I will never forgive them. They took away my safety. How the hell do you forgive that? I don't. And I sleep fine at night.” Healing isn’t forced forgiveness — it’s becoming your authentic self, even if that self says “no forgiveness.” 0:55 clip — brutal honesty 👇 Do you think forgiveness is required for healing from narcissists? Or is refusing it a valid path to peace?

Camus

69,142 次观看 • 7 个月前

“One in 25 people is a sociopath or psychopath.” Evy Poumpouras dropped this stat on Lewis Howes’ podcast and it stopped me cold. She explained that true narcissism, sociopathy, and psychopathy have very specific clinical criteria (lack of empathy, lack of remorse, etc.) — not just “someone disagreed with me.” Slapping those labels on everyone is actually pretty narcissistic itself. The real red flag? People who meet the full criteria for antisocial personality disorders (what we used to call sociopaths/psychopaths) are far more common than most realize. According to the research she cited, about 1 in 25 people show these tendencies. It’s a sobering reminder to pay attention to patterns of behavior rather than throwing clinical terms around casually. How do you spot the difference between someone who’s just difficult versus someone who actually lacks empathy or remorse?

“One in 25 people is a sociopath or psychopath.” Evy Poumpouras dropped this stat on Lewis Howes’ podcast and it stopped me cold. She explained that true narcissism, sociopathy, and psychopathy have very specific clinical criteria (lack of empathy, lack of remorse, etc.) — not just “someone disagreed with me.” Slapping those labels on everyone is actually pretty narcissistic itself. The real red flag? People who meet the full criteria for antisocial personality disorders (what we used to call sociopaths/psychopaths) are far more common than most realize. According to the research she cited, about 1 in 25 people show these tendencies. It’s a sobering reminder to pay attention to patterns of behavior rather than throwing clinical terms around casually. How do you spot the difference between someone who’s just difficult versus someone who actually lacks empathy or remorse?

Camus

21,497 次观看 • 3 个月前

There are two kinds of narcissists: 1. Grandiose narcissists: Dominant, extraverted, overconfident, exploitative, egotistical, low emotional distress. This is the version of narcissism people tend to be most familiar with. 2. Vulnerable narcissists: Self-centered, introverted, defensive, resentful, high emotional distress. Psychologists call them “hidden” narcissists because they don’t self-promote the way the grandiose types do. Compared with grandiose narcissists, vulnerable narcissists are more susceptible to narcissistic injury. Narcissistic injury occurs when a narcissist feels that their hidden, “true self” has been revealed—insecure, envious, deceitful, manipulative—they resent having a mirror held up to them. When their self-image is questioned—they react with rage. Both grandiose and vulnerable narcissists hold high opinions of themselves and believe they deserve special treatment. Grandiose narcissists enjoy any kind of attention. Their positive self-image is resistant to criticism. They always think they’re amazing no matter what people say. In contrast, vulnerable narcissists have mixed feelings about seeking attention. They are overly excited at the prospect of positive feedback. But excessively sensitive to negative feedback. They have a high opinion of themselves, though this opinion can be thwarted if the external world does not validate it. Both types of narcissists tend to be exploitative and see themselves as superior in some way. Compared to grandiose narcissists, vulnerable narcissists are more sensitive to insults, ruminate more about perceived unfairness, and report more anger when they do not receive what they think they deserve. Although vulnerable narcissists require external feedback to maintain their sense of self, they are often dissatisfied with the feedback they receive. The typical grandiose narcissist is a wolf in wolf’s clothing. You can spot him a mile away. But the vulnerable narcissist is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They are much harder to detect. From my Peterson Academy lecture series

There are two kinds of narcissists: 1. Grandiose narcissists: Dominant, extraverted, overconfident, exploitative, egotistical, low emotional distress. This is the version of narcissism people tend to be most familiar with. 2. Vulnerable narcissists: Self-centered, introverted, defensive, resentful, high emotional distress. Psychologists call them “hidden” narcissists because they don’t self-promote the way the grandiose types do. Compared with grandiose narcissists, vulnerable narcissists are more susceptible to narcissistic injury. Narcissistic injury occurs when a narcissist feels that their hidden, “true self” has been revealed—insecure, envious, deceitful, manipulative—they resent having a mirror held up to them. When their self-image is questioned—they react with rage. Both grandiose and vulnerable narcissists hold high opinions of themselves and believe they deserve special treatment. Grandiose narcissists enjoy any kind of attention. Their positive self-image is resistant to criticism. They always think they’re amazing no matter what people say. In contrast, vulnerable narcissists have mixed feelings about seeking attention. They are overly excited at the prospect of positive feedback. But excessively sensitive to negative feedback. They have a high opinion of themselves, though this opinion can be thwarted if the external world does not validate it. Both types of narcissists tend to be exploitative and see themselves as superior in some way. Compared to grandiose narcissists, vulnerable narcissists are more sensitive to insults, ruminate more about perceived unfairness, and report more anger when they do not receive what they think they deserve. Although vulnerable narcissists require external feedback to maintain their sense of self, they are often dissatisfied with the feedback they receive. The typical grandiose narcissist is a wolf in wolf’s clothing. You can spot him a mile away. But the vulnerable narcissist is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They are much harder to detect. From my Peterson Academy lecture series

Rob Henderson

13,150 次观看 • 3 个月前

Not all narcissists crave the spotlight. Some resent the world for not handing it to them. Modern research on narcissism suggests that we can distinguish between two main types. The first is grandiose narcissism. This is the classic version people tend to picture. Grandiose narcissists are thick-skinned and largely immune to criticism. If you tell them they are not that impressive, it barely registers. In their minds, the answer is simple: I know I’m great. If you say they fall short, they dismiss it outright. This disposition is not just a personality quirk. It is also linked, in a modest way, to outcomes. Grandiose narcissism tends to correlate positively with subjective well-being—things like happiness, life satisfaction, and general confidence about how life is going. There is even a small statistical relationship with income. It is not large, but it points in a consistent direction. The second type is vulnerable narcissism, and in many ways it is the mirror image. Vulnerable narcissists still see themselves as central and deserving. They want admiration and believe they are entitled to it. But unlike the grandiose type, they struggle to act on these impulses in the real world. Where grandiose narcissists seek out attention, vulnerable narcissists hesitate. They tend to be more introverted and more sensitive to judgment. They want recognition, but they fear rejection. As a result, much of their attention-seeking plays out in fantasy rather than action. They imagine being admired—a famous musician, a political figure, someone widely respected—but they often withdraw from situations where that admiration might be tested. In some cases, this retreat takes modern forms. They may create online personas, for example, where the risk is buffered. If the persona is criticized, it does not feel as personal. Both types share a common core: a desire for attention and a sense of being the center of things. But they diverge sharply in temperament. Grandiose narcissists are outward-facing, confident, and relatively emotionally stable. Vulnerable narcissists are more inward-facing, more anxious, and higher in traits like neuroticism, which makes them more prone to negative emotion.

Not all narcissists crave the spotlight. Some resent the world for not handing it to them. Modern research on narcissism suggests that we can distinguish between two main types. The first is grandiose narcissism. This is the classic version people tend to picture. Grandiose narcissists are thick-skinned and largely immune to criticism. If you tell them they are not that impressive, it barely registers. In their minds, the answer is simple: I know I’m great. If you say they fall short, they dismiss it outright. This disposition is not just a personality quirk. It is also linked, in a modest way, to outcomes. Grandiose narcissism tends to correlate positively with subjective well-being—things like happiness, life satisfaction, and general confidence about how life is going. There is even a small statistical relationship with income. It is not large, but it points in a consistent direction. The second type is vulnerable narcissism, and in many ways it is the mirror image. Vulnerable narcissists still see themselves as central and deserving. They want admiration and believe they are entitled to it. But unlike the grandiose type, they struggle to act on these impulses in the real world. Where grandiose narcissists seek out attention, vulnerable narcissists hesitate. They tend to be more introverted and more sensitive to judgment. They want recognition, but they fear rejection. As a result, much of their attention-seeking plays out in fantasy rather than action. They imagine being admired—a famous musician, a political figure, someone widely respected—but they often withdraw from situations where that admiration might be tested. In some cases, this retreat takes modern forms. They may create online personas, for example, where the risk is buffered. If the persona is criticized, it does not feel as personal. Both types share a common core: a desire for attention and a sense of being the center of things. But they diverge sharply in temperament. Grandiose narcissists are outward-facing, confident, and relatively emotionally stable. Vulnerable narcissists are more inward-facing, more anxious, and higher in traits like neuroticism, which makes them more prone to negative emotion.

Rob Henderson

42,607 次观看 • 3 个月前

Otto Kernberg explains narcissistic personality disorder as a defense mechanism: Kernberg is a 96-year-old Austrian-born American psychoanalyst, professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medicine, and the most-cited psychoanalyst in the world. His work helped shape how narcissistic personality disorder is defined in the DSM. He describes narcissistic personality disorder as one of the severe personality disorders—but one that operates differently from the others. Beneath the surface, these individuals have a borderline personality organization: a fragmented self-concept, unstable views of others, and an internal struggle between idealized and persecutory experiences. But rather than live in that chaos, they construct what Kernberg calls a "pathological grandiose self." "It is constituted by a combination of ideal aspects of the self, ideal aspects of others that have been incorporated as if one possessed them, and ideal aspirations of the self as if one had achieved them." In other words, the person absorbs the qualities they admire in others and treats their own aspirations as already achieved—building an internal world of grandiosity and self-sufficiency. The cost? Everyone else gets devalued. "Others are devalued; 'we don't need them, we are fine, I'm just great by myself, I don't need anybody else.'" Kernberg explains that the outside world then gets divided into three categories: depreciated, worthless people; those who are great and must be admired so their qualities can be absorbed; and potential enemies who must be fought off. This structure creates an illusion of stability. On the surface, the person appears integrated and secure—far more composed than others with severe personality disorders. But underneath the self-satisfaction and grandiosity lies "an incapacity to love others, and an internal sense of grandiosity and emptiness at the same time." There is no genuine mutuality in their relationships. They need admiration constantly but cannot reciprocate. In therapy, this dynamic plays out directly with the therapist. Kernberg describes a long-term power struggle: "They have to show their superiority to the therapist and keep themselves superior to the therapist because the only alternative is then if they would need the therapist, it means that the therapist is superior to them and they would feel immediately inferiorized and humiliated." The therapeutic work involves gradually clarifying and resolving this superiority-inferiority battle, which then reveals what was always underneath: "the underlying borderline structure against which the narcissistic structure was a defense"—the severe splits between idealized and persecutory relationships that the grandiose self was built to hide. The narcissistic personality, in Kernberg's framework, is not the core problem. It is the solution the psyche constructed to avoid an even more painful one.

Otto Kernberg explains narcissistic personality disorder as a defense mechanism: Kernberg is a 96-year-old Austrian-born American psychoanalyst, professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medicine, and the most-cited psychoanalyst in the world. His work helped shape how narcissistic personality disorder is defined in the DSM. He describes narcissistic personality disorder as one of the severe personality disorders—but one that operates differently from the others. Beneath the surface, these individuals have a borderline personality organization: a fragmented self-concept, unstable views of others, and an internal struggle between idealized and persecutory experiences. But rather than live in that chaos, they construct what Kernberg calls a "pathological grandiose self." "It is constituted by a combination of ideal aspects of the self, ideal aspects of others that have been incorporated as if one possessed them, and ideal aspirations of the self as if one had achieved them." In other words, the person absorbs the qualities they admire in others and treats their own aspirations as already achieved—building an internal world of grandiosity and self-sufficiency. The cost? Everyone else gets devalued. "Others are devalued; 'we don't need them, we are fine, I'm just great by myself, I don't need anybody else.'" Kernberg explains that the outside world then gets divided into three categories: depreciated, worthless people; those who are great and must be admired so their qualities can be absorbed; and potential enemies who must be fought off. This structure creates an illusion of stability. On the surface, the person appears integrated and secure—far more composed than others with severe personality disorders. But underneath the self-satisfaction and grandiosity lies "an incapacity to love others, and an internal sense of grandiosity and emptiness at the same time." There is no genuine mutuality in their relationships. They need admiration constantly but cannot reciprocate. In therapy, this dynamic plays out directly with the therapist. Kernberg describes a long-term power struggle: "They have to show their superiority to the therapist and keep themselves superior to the therapist because the only alternative is then if they would need the therapist, it means that the therapist is superior to them and they would feel immediately inferiorized and humiliated." The therapeutic work involves gradually clarifying and resolving this superiority-inferiority battle, which then reveals what was always underneath: "the underlying borderline structure against which the narcissistic structure was a defense"—the severe splits between idealized and persecutory relationships that the grandiose self was built to hide. The narcissistic personality, in Kernberg's framework, is not the core problem. It is the solution the psyche constructed to avoid an even more painful one.

Kevin Tanaka

297,384 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dr. Ramani Durvasula just delivered the clearest breakdown of narcissism I’ve ever heard. No fluff. Just the raw traits: - Zero real empathy - Extreme entitlement (special treatment for me, rules for everyone else) - Grandiose fantasies and only wanting to associate with “high-status” people - Superficial charm — beautiful facades with almost nothing underneath - Quick to rage or throw tantrums when they don’t get their way - Hypersensitive to criticism (they dish it out constantly but crumble if you give any back) It’s the kind of description that makes you stop and quietly think… “damn.” Have you ever dealt with someone who checked most of these boxes? What was that experience actually like?

Dr. Ramani Durvasula just delivered the clearest breakdown of narcissism I’ve ever heard. No fluff. Just the raw traits: - Zero real empathy - Extreme entitlement (special treatment for me, rules for everyone else) - Grandiose fantasies and only wanting to associate with “high-status” people - Superficial charm — beautiful facades with almost nothing underneath - Quick to rage or throw tantrums when they don’t get their way - Hypersensitive to criticism (they dish it out constantly but crumble if you give any back) It’s the kind of description that makes you stop and quietly think… “damn.” Have you ever dealt with someone who checked most of these boxes? What was that experience actually like?

Camus

73,065 次观看 • 4 个月前

People with narcissistic or psychopathic personality traits are often drawn to certain ideologies and forms of political activism. They use activism as a vehicle to feed their own ego rather than to work toward real social change. People who are high on what psychologists call the dark triad—narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism—will often hijack movements for their own ends. Activism gives them a way to disguise their ugly motives with a veneer of moral concern. It lets them turn what should be about helping others into a way to boost their own status, admiration, and prestige. That’s why it’s a mistake to treat the loudest, most extreme personalities as representative. Most people aren’t high in these traits. But those who are tend to have a megaphone. They love attention. They love stirring up controversy. They post constantly. They talk endlessly. It’s worth remembering the “1% rule” of social media: about 1 percent of people create most of what you see online, 9 percent occasionally engage, and 90 percent are just lurking. Which means the most unhinged voices often set the tone for the whole conversation.

People with narcissistic or psychopathic personality traits are often drawn to certain ideologies and forms of political activism. They use activism as a vehicle to feed their own ego rather than to work toward real social change. People who are high on what psychologists call the dark triad—narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism—will often hijack movements for their own ends. Activism gives them a way to disguise their ugly motives with a veneer of moral concern. It lets them turn what should be about helping others into a way to boost their own status, admiration, and prestige. That’s why it’s a mistake to treat the loudest, most extreme personalities as representative. Most people aren’t high in these traits. But those who are tend to have a megaphone. They love attention. They love stirring up controversy. They post constantly. They talk endlessly. It’s worth remembering the “1% rule” of social media: about 1 percent of people create most of what you see online, 9 percent occasionally engage, and 90 percent are just lurking. Which means the most unhinged voices often set the tone for the whole conversation.

Rob Henderson

151,723 次观看 • 10 个月前

Too many voices today are teaching people and especially kids that they are victims of their circumstances and that their environment causes them to be a certain way. But the truth is that you always create from the inside out and the power is inside you to transform your environment and circumstance. This is how and why people overcome poverty, dysfunctional families, tough neighborhoods and adverse conditions. So stop looking for others to take care of you and save you and decide to become someone who impacts and saves others. That’s what being a Coffee Bean is all about!

Too many voices today are teaching people and especially kids that they are victims of their circumstances and that their environment causes them to be a certain way. But the truth is that you always create from the inside out and the power is inside you to transform your environment and circumstance. This is how and why people overcome poverty, dysfunctional families, tough neighborhoods and adverse conditions. So stop looking for others to take care of you and save you and decide to become someone who impacts and saves others. That’s what being a Coffee Bean is all about!

Jon Gordon

95,079 次观看 • 1 年前

Whitney Cummings had a sharp, dark take on what it would actually take to unite people. The Epstein files brought people together for a couple of weeks… until they started disappearing. She says the only thing left that could truly unite everyone is aliens showing up. Suddenly everyone would forget their divisions. This one had me laughing out loud. The way she connects tech addiction, narcissism, and our inability to revolt is brutally funny and a little too accurate. We’re more divided and distracted than ever, and the distractions are working better than any conspiracy could. Do you think something massive like aliens is the only thing left that could actually bring people together?

Whitney Cummings had a sharp, dark take on what it would actually take to unite people. The Epstein files brought people together for a couple of weeks… until they started disappearing. She says the only thing left that could truly unite everyone is aliens showing up. Suddenly everyone would forget their divisions. This one had me laughing out loud. The way she connects tech addiction, narcissism, and our inability to revolt is brutally funny and a little too accurate. We’re more divided and distracted than ever, and the distractions are working better than any conspiracy could. Do you think something massive like aliens is the only thing left that could actually bring people together?

Camus

15,563 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is why I love Elon Musk! Elon Musk just flips the interview and tells the legacy media that they are the ones people actually hate. "Elon Musk: Perhaps some people do loathe me. That is probably true. I do not care. But as you pointed out, a quarter of a billion people follow me. I think far more people like me than dislike me. I also think far more people hate you and the media than you realize. Do you realize how despised the media is? The favorable view of journalists is around 15 percent. Interviewer: Yes, I know there is a loss of trust in journalism in the United States. There have been mistakes by journalists and by journalism, and I fully acknowledge that. But I also think the polarized environment, particularly on social media, which is fostered by the kind of things you promote on X, makes it worse. Elon Musk: I do not think so. I think the media is the problem. People loathe you far more than they loathe me, and you do not seem to realize it. Interviewer: Very few people know who I am compared with you, so I do not think we are playing the same game. Elon Musk: The media collectively is hated. Do you even realize that?"

This is why I love Elon Musk! Elon Musk just flips the interview and tells the legacy media that they are the ones people actually hate. "Elon Musk: Perhaps some people do loathe me. That is probably true. I do not care. But as you pointed out, a quarter of a billion people follow me. I think far more people like me than dislike me. I also think far more people hate you and the media than you realize. Do you realize how despised the media is? The favorable view of journalists is around 15 percent. Interviewer: Yes, I know there is a loss of trust in journalism in the United States. There have been mistakes by journalists and by journalism, and I fully acknowledge that. But I also think the polarized environment, particularly on social media, which is fostered by the kind of things you promote on X, makes it worse. Elon Musk: I do not think so. I think the media is the problem. People loathe you far more than they loathe me, and you do not seem to realize it. Interviewer: Very few people know who I am compared with you, so I do not think we are playing the same game. Elon Musk: The media collectively is hated. Do you even realize that?"

Doge Tipping

112,421 次观看 • 13 天前

ELON: EVERYONE ON EARTH WILL WANT THEIR OWN ROBOT “My prediction is the robots will actually make so many robots and AI that they will actually saturate all human needs, meaning you won't be able to even think of something to ask the robot for at a certain point. There'll be more robots than people. I think everyone on Earth is going to have one and going to want one, because who wouldn't want a robot to, assuming it's very safe, watch over your kids, take care of your pet. If you have elderly parents, it's very difficult to take care of them. It's expensive, and there just aren't enough young people to take care of the old people. If you had a robot that could take care of and protect an elderly parent, I think that would be great. That would be an amazing thing to have. And I think we will have those things.” Source: Elon Musk Interview at WEF, January 2026

ELON: EVERYONE ON EARTH WILL WANT THEIR OWN ROBOT “My prediction is the robots will actually make so many robots and AI that they will actually saturate all human needs, meaning you won't be able to even think of something to ask the robot for at a certain point. There'll be more robots than people. I think everyone on Earth is going to have one and going to want one, because who wouldn't want a robot to, assuming it's very safe, watch over your kids, take care of your pet. If you have elderly parents, it's very difficult to take care of them. It's expensive, and there just aren't enough young people to take care of the old people. If you had a robot that could take care of and protect an elderly parent, I think that would be great. That would be an amazing thing to have. And I think we will have those things.” Source: Elon Musk Interview at WEF, January 2026

Mario Nawfal

47,723 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk predicts working will be optional in less than 20 years. “My prediction is: in less than 20 years, working will be optional, like a hobby, pretty much. And that would be because of increased productivity, meaning people do not have to work; they don’t have to. Look, obviously people can play this back in 20 years and say, “Look, Elon made this ridiculous prediction and it’s not true,” but I think it will turn out to be true—that in less than 20 years, and maybe even as little as, I don’t know, 10 or 15 years, the advancements in AI and robotics will bring us to the point where working is optional. In the same way that, like, say, you can grow your own vegetables in your garden or you could go to the store and buy vegetables, you know. It’s much harder to grow your own vegetables, but you know, some people like to grow their vegetables, which is fine, you know. But it’ll be optional in that way, is my prediction.” — Via new Podcast with Nikhil Kamath

Elon Musk predicts working will be optional in less than 20 years. “My prediction is: in less than 20 years, working will be optional, like a hobby, pretty much. And that would be because of increased productivity, meaning people do not have to work; they don’t have to. Look, obviously people can play this back in 20 years and say, “Look, Elon made this ridiculous prediction and it’s not true,” but I think it will turn out to be true—that in less than 20 years, and maybe even as little as, I don’t know, 10 or 15 years, the advancements in AI and robotics will bring us to the point where working is optional. In the same way that, like, say, you can grow your own vegetables in your garden or you could go to the store and buy vegetables, you know. It’s much harder to grow your own vegetables, but you know, some people like to grow their vegetables, which is fine, you know. But it’ll be optional in that way, is my prediction.” — Via new Podcast with Nikhil Kamath

Nic Cruz Patane

61,603 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk: I believe we should have deep empathy, not shallow empathy. “There's a small number of people, a few percent of society, that can have anger management issues that are so severe that they lose their temper and hurt or murder others. And there's a small number, it's not a large number that enjoy hurting other people. And if you do not incarcerate them, they will do that. They will hurt other people. And what I see is what I call shallow empathy. Like, people have empathy for the criminals but not empathy for the victims of the criminals. I believe one should have deep empathy to say, what is the greater good for society? Is it better to incarcerate violent criminals and prevent them from hurting people or to let them loose and allow those people to be hurt? And I think the latter is much worse.” Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024

Elon Musk: I believe we should have deep empathy, not shallow empathy. “There's a small number of people, a few percent of society, that can have anger management issues that are so severe that they lose their temper and hurt or murder others. And there's a small number, it's not a large number that enjoy hurting other people. And if you do not incarcerate them, they will do that. They will hurt other people. And what I see is what I call shallow empathy. Like, people have empathy for the criminals but not empathy for the victims of the criminals. I believe one should have deep empathy to say, what is the greater good for society? Is it better to incarcerate violent criminals and prevent them from hurting people or to let them loose and allow those people to be hurt? And I think the latter is much worse.” Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024

ELON CLIPS

31,035 次观看 • 1 年前

Mom! Allie Beth’s Bossing Me! So here we all are, in the feminist longhouse, wondering if there is a good way to navigate our way out of this leper colony. The longhouse rules dictate what the docile men are supposed to do, which they willingly do as their civic duty, abjuring their privilege as they go. Of course they do. But the rules are so entrenched that they also affect and drive the behavior of many of those who fancy themselves restive rebels against the matriarchy. But the feminists have done a more thorough job smashing the patriarchy than the click bait bros have done in smashing the longhouse. For example, Allie Beth Stuckey did a thing, and gave a big sister talk to the men. Like most big sisters, she did not anticipate how it would come across, and found that her pungent observations were, um, underappreciated. She even had that big sister tone, which didn’t help. There were howls of protest, many of them from men who found that they would rather talk about Allie Beth getting out of her lane than to even think about the men who have been enervated by porn. That would be to acknowledge that big sister might have had something of a point, and in many of the cases she might have had a point about their own browser histories. But rather than think about their own browser histories, they concluded it would be much more edifying to yell about Allie Beth’s conservative variant of feminism. And so yell they did.

Mom! Allie Beth’s Bossing Me! So here we all are, in the feminist longhouse, wondering if there is a good way to navigate our way out of this leper colony. The longhouse rules dictate what the docile men are supposed to do, which they willingly do as their civic duty, abjuring their privilege as they go. Of course they do. But the rules are so entrenched that they also affect and drive the behavior of many of those who fancy themselves restive rebels against the matriarchy. But the feminists have done a more thorough job smashing the patriarchy than the click bait bros have done in smashing the longhouse. For example, Allie Beth Stuckey did a thing, and gave a big sister talk to the men. Like most big sisters, she did not anticipate how it would come across, and found that her pungent observations were, um, underappreciated. She even had that big sister tone, which didn’t help. There were howls of protest, many of them from men who found that they would rather talk about Allie Beth getting out of her lane than to even think about the men who have been enervated by porn. That would be to acknowledge that big sister might have had something of a point, and in many of the cases she might have had a point about their own browser histories. But rather than think about their own browser histories, they concluded it would be much more edifying to yell about Allie Beth’s conservative variant of feminism. And so yell they did.

Douglas Wilson

161,884 次观看 • 9 个月前

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”

Dr. Ben Carson warns that the media will stop at nothing to elevate Kamala Harris from being “universally disliked” to a “godlike figure.” TUCKER CARLSON: “What do you think of Kamala Harris?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she is a politician.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Yeah.” DR. BEN CARSON: “And she's interested in the accumulation of power and control.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think she believes in anything?” DR. BEN CARSON: “I think she believes in government, like most Marxists. Yes, I think she is a Marxist.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Do you think that she can win?” DR. BEN CARSON: “Absolutely she can win. This is going to be a great test of the power of the media to take someone who formerly was universally disliked and transform them into a godlike figure, and they will use everything that they have to try to do that. The question is, are the American people smart enough to see through it? And I actually think the American people are smarter than anybody gives them credit for. And I don't think that they are going to be willing to sacrifice what we have in this country, which is what everybody else wants, even though they try to denigrate our country, say we're systemically racist, we're unfair to people. If we were all that bad, why are all these people trying to get in here? Why aren't people trying to get out of here? So we know that we have something that's very good. And I think the American people realize that, and they're not willing to give that up and trade that for something inferior.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,111,682 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk: I think hormonal birth control is making a lot of women sad and depressed. “I think a lot of women are unaware that hormonal birth control causes depression and dramatically increases risk of suicide and changes their preferences on who they want to marry or have kids with. It changes their personality. And it does say this on the box, by the way. The warnings are has significant significant risk of depression, significant increase in suicide and will make you want to go out with people that you don't actually like. I think hormonal birth control is making a lot of women sad and depressed. And they don't realize it and they don't realize that's the cause and that there are other forms of contraception that could be used. I think there are other forms of birth control I think have fewer negative effects than hormonal. We should just be aware that this is not a riskless thing and it does cause severe mood changes and dramatically increases risk of suicide and depression.” Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024

Elon Musk: I think hormonal birth control is making a lot of women sad and depressed. “I think a lot of women are unaware that hormonal birth control causes depression and dramatically increases risk of suicide and changes their preferences on who they want to marry or have kids with. It changes their personality. And it does say this on the box, by the way. The warnings are has significant significant risk of depression, significant increase in suicide and will make you want to go out with people that you don't actually like. I think hormonal birth control is making a lot of women sad and depressed. And they don't realize it and they don't realize that's the cause and that there are other forms of contraception that could be used. I think there are other forms of birth control I think have fewer negative effects than hormonal. We should just be aware that this is not a riskless thing and it does cause severe mood changes and dramatically increases risk of suicide and depression.” Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024

ELON CLIPS

918,210 次观看 • 11 个月前

🤔 HOW PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY USING IVERMECTIN AT HOME A lot of people have been asking about Ivermectin lately, so here’s what many are sharing based on their own experience. There are a few common forms people use: ✅ Horse paste: Looks like applesauce and is easy to take directly. ✅ Liquid form made for cattle and swine: Taken orally by mixing in juice or water. Many say this version is more affordable for longer use. People use it in different ways depending on their goal. Some take a small amount for a few days when they feel unwell. Others follow longer cycles like five days on and five days off, or two weeks on and two weeks off. Many mention that everyone seems to have their own approach. Some do short cleanses around the full moon each month, while others do it quarterly or twice a year. It often depends on lifestyle and how they’re feeling. Human-grade versions are also available through certain online pharmacies that provide the prescription during checkout. Visit PharmacyinUSA to access quality Ivermectin with worldwide delivery. #Ivermectin #ParasiteCleanse #Health

🤔 HOW PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY USING IVERMECTIN AT HOME A lot of people have been asking about Ivermectin lately, so here’s what many are sharing based on their own experience. There are a few common forms people use: ✅ Horse paste: Looks like applesauce and is easy to take directly. ✅ Liquid form made for cattle and swine: Taken orally by mixing in juice or water. Many say this version is more affordable for longer use. People use it in different ways depending on their goal. Some take a small amount for a few days when they feel unwell. Others follow longer cycles like five days on and five days off, or two weeks on and two weeks off. Many mention that everyone seems to have their own approach. Some do short cleanses around the full moon each month, while others do it quarterly or twice a year. It often depends on lifestyle and how they’re feeling. Human-grade versions are also available through certain online pharmacies that provide the prescription during checkout. Visit PharmacyinUSA to access quality Ivermectin with worldwide delivery. #Ivermectin #ParasiteCleanse #Health

PharmacyinUSA

15,954 次观看 • 1 个月前

#MaryKom has clearly demonstrated that you may be No. 1 in your profession, but everyone doesn't have grace & class She sounds more like a street urchin here like many others, who have one holier than thou face for the world and one below 3rd class that common people can't even imagine Good, she has exposed her cheap mindset on camera... #Onler

#MaryKom has clearly demonstrated that you may be No. 1 in your profession, but everyone doesn't have grace & class She sounds more like a street urchin here like many others, who have one holier than thou face for the world and one below 3rd class that common people can't even imagine Good, she has exposed her cheap mindset on camera... #Onler

Arnaz Hathiram Jain

25,176 次观看 • 6 个月前