Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

One thing I’ve learned coaching OL: Most Inside Zone problems are really combo problems. Oklahoma working C+G Pods here. Great way to drill: • displacement • LB flow • overtakes • timing on climbs We’ve started building entire pod progressions in the Vault around this.

Chad Johnson • GameDay Systems

5,204 subscribers

12,984 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

108,875 views • 1 year ago

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel “You need to spend a lot of time focusing people. This is something I learned from Peter Thiel. He used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it’s insulting to be asked to do just one thing, but Peter would enforce this pretty strictly.” Thiel would say: “I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I’ve assigned to you. I don’t want to hear about how great your doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.” Keith explains: “The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they’re difficult—you don’t wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate… If you have a company that’s always solving B+ problems, you’ll grow and add value, but you’ll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it.” Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel “You need to spend a lot of time focusing people. This is something I learned from Peter Thiel. He used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it’s insulting to be asked to do just one thing, but Peter would enforce this pretty strictly.” Thiel would say: “I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I’ve assigned to you. I don’t want to hear about how great your doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.” Keith explains: “The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they’re difficult—you don’t wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate… If you have a company that’s always solving B+ problems, you’ll grow and add value, but you’ll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it.” Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

81,796 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk on building a company: “There are periods where it’s just awful” “A lot of times people think creating a company is going to be fun. I would say it’s really not that fun. There are periods of fun, and there are periods where it’s just awful. Particularly if you’re the CEO of the company. You actually have a distillation of all the worst problems in the company. There’s no point in spending your time on things that are going right. So you only spend your time on things that are going wrong that other people can’t take care of… the most pernicious and painful problems.” Elon believes founders need to have a “fairly high pain threshold” and explains that starting a company is like “staring into the abyss and eating glass.” “The staring into the abyss part is that you’re going to be constantly facing the extermination of the company because most startups fail… You’re constantly saying, okay, if I don’t get this right, the company will die. It’s going to be quite stressful. And then the eating glass part is you’ve got to work on the problems that the company needs you to work on, not the problems you want to work on. And so you end up working on problems that you’d really wish you weren’t working on… And that goes on for a long time.” Source: Khan Academy (Apr 2013)

Elon Musk on building a company: “There are periods where it’s just awful” “A lot of times people think creating a company is going to be fun. I would say it’s really not that fun. There are periods of fun, and there are periods where it’s just awful. Particularly if you’re the CEO of the company. You actually have a distillation of all the worst problems in the company. There’s no point in spending your time on things that are going right. So you only spend your time on things that are going wrong that other people can’t take care of… the most pernicious and painful problems.” Elon believes founders need to have a “fairly high pain threshold” and explains that starting a company is like “staring into the abyss and eating glass.” “The staring into the abyss part is that you’re going to be constantly facing the extermination of the company because most startups fail… You’re constantly saying, okay, if I don’t get this right, the company will die. It’s going to be quite stressful. And then the eating glass part is you’ve got to work on the problems that the company needs you to work on, not the problems you want to work on. And so you end up working on problems that you’d really wish you weren’t working on… And that goes on for a long time.” Source: Khan Academy (Apr 2013)

Startup Archive

64,969 views • 6 days ago

Alexandr Wang on why Paul Graham’s “Schlep Blindness” essay was seminal for Scale AI “One of the secrets to Scale AI — and I think this applies to almost every industry — was that the problem we were solving of building really high quality data sets was something that most machine learning teams knew was very important but it wasn’t necessarily the sexiest problem that every AI scientist wanted to spend their days and nights working on.” Alexandr continues: “There was one article that was pretty seminal for me early on. It was an essay by Paul Graham called ‘Schlep Blindness.’ I’d encourage everyone to read it if you get a chance. But basically the idea was that most people avoid thinking about the really difficult, hairy, ugly, and annoying problems that exist in the world but they’re really important. He actually uses Stripe as one of the examples in his essay, but these problems are everywhere. The ugly, hairy problems that everyone knows are important but aren’t sexy to work on — if you can identify what those problems are, they generally make really exciting startup ideas.” This was a lot of the original pitch for Scale: “You know this is important but you probably aren’t the most excited to work on it.” And then the early Scale team was super scrappy, which helped them earn the trust of their customers: “They saw our product velocity and how fast we were moving. They thought to themselves, ‘Even if they don’t have the perfect product today, they’re going to get to a product that we’re going to be able to rely on really quickly.’” Source: Startup Grind (Apr 2022)

Alexandr Wang on why Paul Graham’s “Schlep Blindness” essay was seminal for Scale AI “One of the secrets to Scale AI — and I think this applies to almost every industry — was that the problem we were solving of building really high quality data sets was something that most machine learning teams knew was very important but it wasn’t necessarily the sexiest problem that every AI scientist wanted to spend their days and nights working on.” Alexandr continues: “There was one article that was pretty seminal for me early on. It was an essay by Paul Graham called ‘Schlep Blindness.’ I’d encourage everyone to read it if you get a chance. But basically the idea was that most people avoid thinking about the really difficult, hairy, ugly, and annoying problems that exist in the world but they’re really important. He actually uses Stripe as one of the examples in his essay, but these problems are everywhere. The ugly, hairy problems that everyone knows are important but aren’t sexy to work on — if you can identify what those problems are, they generally make really exciting startup ideas.” This was a lot of the original pitch for Scale: “You know this is important but you probably aren’t the most excited to work on it.” And then the early Scale team was super scrappy, which helped them earn the trust of their customers: “They saw our product velocity and how fast we were moving. They thought to themselves, ‘Even if they don’t have the perfect product today, they’re going to get to a product that we’re going to be able to rely on really quickly.’” Source: Startup Grind (Apr 2022)

Startup Archive

56,503 views • 2 months ago

Peter Thiel on how to build the next billion-dollar startup: "Every moment in the history of business happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. The next Bill Gates won't start an operating system. The next Elon Musk won't start a Tesla electric car company." Peter's entire thesis rejects the idea of formulas in business. As he puts it: "Science starts with things that are experimentally repeatable, but great businesses are zero to one; they're always one-of-a-kind. There is always this anti-formulaic quality." So what's the one theme he keeps coming back to? "This need for differentiation. What are you doing that nobody else is doing? What ideas do you have that nobody else has? What great business are you working on that no one else is working on?" He continues: "If you're a founder or an entrepreneur, you should always aim to build a monopoly where you're the only person in the world doing what you're doing. There really are only two kinds of businesses in this world: businesses that are in crazy competition and one-of-a-kind businesses that are monopolies." On why you shouldn't just iterate your way to success: "The core thing is to have a great product, and then you can always improve and iterate on that. If you're just trying to optimize and you don't have a great product, that rarely works." His advice? Think 5 to 10 years ahead: "Why will this be a really valuable business in 5 to 10 years? How's the competitive landscape going to develop? These are hard questions to answer, but the great entrepreneurs I know always have some perspective on it. When I was playing chess, one of the early lessons I learned was, a bad plan is still always better than no plan at all." On what makes work meaningful: "It's great to be working on problems where if you weren't working on them, nobody else would do them. If we weren't doing this, this problem would absolutely not be tackled. That's what's meaningful. Whereas when you're competing, you're already, by definition, number two at least in a category." Build something only you can build.

Peter Thiel on how to build the next billion-dollar startup: "Every moment in the history of business happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. The next Bill Gates won't start an operating system. The next Elon Musk won't start a Tesla electric car company." Peter's entire thesis rejects the idea of formulas in business. As he puts it: "Science starts with things that are experimentally repeatable, but great businesses are zero to one; they're always one-of-a-kind. There is always this anti-formulaic quality." So what's the one theme he keeps coming back to? "This need for differentiation. What are you doing that nobody else is doing? What ideas do you have that nobody else has? What great business are you working on that no one else is working on?" He continues: "If you're a founder or an entrepreneur, you should always aim to build a monopoly where you're the only person in the world doing what you're doing. There really are only two kinds of businesses in this world: businesses that are in crazy competition and one-of-a-kind businesses that are monopolies." On why you shouldn't just iterate your way to success: "The core thing is to have a great product, and then you can always improve and iterate on that. If you're just trying to optimize and you don't have a great product, that rarely works." His advice? Think 5 to 10 years ahead: "Why will this be a really valuable business in 5 to 10 years? How's the competitive landscape going to develop? These are hard questions to answer, but the great entrepreneurs I know always have some perspective on it. When I was playing chess, one of the early lessons I learned was, a bad plan is still always better than no plan at all." On what makes work meaningful: "It's great to be working on problems where if you weren't working on them, nobody else would do them. If we weren't doing this, this problem would absolutely not be tackled. That's what's meaningful. Whereas when you're competing, you're already, by definition, number two at least in a category." Build something only you can build.

Jaynit

77,758 views • 7 months ago

If there’s one thing I’ve learned on my lower back journey, it’s this: 👉Strengthening beats stretching every time. If you have lower back problems, chances are your psoas muscles are weak. You can stretch, massage, and foam roll all you want but it won’t be as effective as *movement with resistance*. When I added hanging leg lifts to my routine I saw immediate results. Now I’ve started adding weight with MonkeyFeet—and even a little weight makes it so much harder. (Note: Bent-knee lifts are best for targeting the psoas. Straight leg lifts target the abs and have more to do with body geometry than strength.)

If there’s one thing I’ve learned on my lower back journey, it’s this: 👉Strengthening beats stretching every time. If you have lower back problems, chances are your psoas muscles are weak. You can stretch, massage, and foam roll all you want but it won’t be as effective as movement with resistance. When I added hanging leg lifts to my routine I saw immediate results. Now I’ve started adding weight with MonkeyFeet—and even a little weight makes it so much harder. (Note: Bent-knee lifts are best for targeting the psoas. Straight leg lifts target the abs and have more to do with body geometry than strength.)

Kevin Dahlstrom

21,285 views • 1 year ago

.Sam Altman: If I had to pick one favorite book, I would pick The Beginning of Infinity by David Deutsch. Even if you don’t read the whole thing, the first 40–50 pages are, I think, the most wonderfully optimistic take on why—even in a world with AI—we’re never going to run out of things to do, ways to be useful, problems to solve, and things to explore. I also think it explains, so beautifully, how we got here and why the relatively simple process we’ve followed throughout human history brought us to this incredible place.

.Sam Altman: If I had to pick one favorite book, I would pick The Beginning of Infinity by David Deutsch. Even if you don’t read the whole thing, the first 40–50 pages are, I think, the most wonderfully optimistic take on why—even in a world with AI—we’re never going to run out of things to do, ways to be useful, problems to solve, and things to explore. I also think it explains, so beautifully, how we got here and why the relatively simple process we’ve followed throughout human history brought us to this incredible place.

Arjun Khemani

242,793 views • 10 months ago

The truth has a way of revealing itself, no matter how long it’s buried. I think we are seeing examples of this around the world today. As I’ve spent time examining Diana’s death, I’ve been struck by how many questions still have no clear answers in this case. Looking at what’s happening around the world, it feels like the right moment to take a closer, more honest look at what really happened that night. I believe there may have been foul play involved. I enjoyed working on this episode. The research and the people we spoke to made it a great experience.

The truth has a way of revealing itself, no matter how long it’s buried. I think we are seeing examples of this around the world today. As I’ve spent time examining Diana’s death, I’ve been struck by how many questions still have no clear answers in this case. Looking at what’s happening around the world, it feels like the right moment to take a closer, more honest look at what really happened that night. I believe there may have been foul play involved. I enjoyed working on this episode. The research and the people we spoke to made it a great experience.

ELIZABETH LANE

32,244 views • 5 months ago

PRAYER IS POWERFUL, but God doesn't always say "yes" when we ask for what we think we need or want. Sometimes we need to work and earn whatever it is we want/need. Moral of the story: If we practice Christian principles (the principles on which this country was founded) - and learn to count our many blessings, we can find happiness. Most great things in life are created through prayer and perseverance and are not always easy, but one thing is sure - we can learn to be happy in whatever situation even when we are struggling but working to fix our problems. When there is life, there is hope.

PRAYER IS POWERFUL, but God doesn't always say "yes" when we ask for what we think we need or want. Sometimes we need to work and earn whatever it is we want/need. Moral of the story: If we practice Christian principles (the principles on which this country was founded) - and learn to count our many blessings, we can find happiness. Most great things in life are created through prayer and perseverance and are not always easy, but one thing is sure - we can learn to be happy in whatever situation even when we are struggling but working to fix our problems. When there is life, there is hope.

BelannF

23,919 views • 1 year ago

NC State Football C Dylan McMahon has been killing it for the West team on Day 2 of #ShrineBowl practices. Excellent anchor during 1-on-1's and displayed great technique and movement skills in the team session. Here's a nice rep on the double-team on IZ here. Good job "knocking" the DT's hip and then peeling off on the linebacker. If you pay attention to the opposite EZ camera view, you can see that his eyes are locked on the LB the entire time. Coach Garett Tujague did a great job with this one. #NFL #NFLDraft

NC State Football C Dylan McMahon has been killing it for the West team on Day 2 of #ShrineBowl practices. Excellent anchor during 1-on-1's and displayed great technique and movement skills in the team session. Here's a nice rep on the double-team on IZ here. Good job "knocking" the DT's hip and then peeling off on the linebacker. If you pay attention to the opposite EZ camera view, you can see that his eyes are locked on the LB the entire time. Coach Garett Tujague did a great job with this one. #NFL #NFLDraft

Matt Wilson

20,025 views • 2 years ago

Humbling. No other way to describe my first day training for The Kettlebell Mile. I started slow, but I’m committed to working up to a full mile “run” with this thing. Some folks are criticizing Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. for “promoting” a reckless & dangerous challenge like this after his great podcast convo with Pavel Tsatsouline. My take? Spending your life on the couch with a remote in one hand and a beer in the other is far more dangerous.

Humbling. No other way to describe my first day training for The Kettlebell Mile. I started slow, but I’m committed to working up to a full mile “run” with this thing. Some folks are criticizing Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. for “promoting” a reckless & dangerous challenge like this after his great podcast convo with Pavel Tsatsouline. My take? Spending your life on the couch with a remote in one hand and a beer in the other is far more dangerous.

Chris S. Cornell

921,853 views • 1 year ago

Singing wasn’t even in the script, but once Terry Crews started singing they decided to keep it. This “A Thousand Miles” singing moment in White Chicks wasn’t fully scripted. The song choice was planned, but the way the actors performed it was mostly improvised on set. The cast naturally built the chaotic energy and timing inside the car while the Wayans brothers encouraged them to play around with the scene. Terry Crews even practiced the song for weeks and improvised many of his reactions, which helped turn this moment into one of the funniest and most iconic scenes in the movie.

Singing wasn’t even in the script, but once Terry Crews started singing they decided to keep it. This “A Thousand Miles” singing moment in White Chicks wasn’t fully scripted. The song choice was planned, but the way the actors performed it was mostly improvised on set. The cast naturally built the chaotic energy and timing inside the car while the Wayans brothers encouraged them to play around with the scene. Terry Crews even practiced the song for weeks and improvised many of his reactions, which helped turn this moment into one of the funniest and most iconic scenes in the movie.

Movie Memories™

145,254 views • 7 months ago

WOW 🚨 Entire office buildings are being discovered in Portland Maine, each on packed with home health care companies that are “rarely staffed” Multiple buildings with 20-22+ home health care companies found IN ONE BUILDING “It's the same thing that we're finding in Minnesota, just to be completely blunt, the same tactics being used to defraud Medicaid. In this case, Zombie offices, I call them, where large clusters of home health care businesses and providers in one location. We saw them in Minnesota and we're seeing them here and the business owners and building owners that we speak to here say, enough. We're here in Portland, Maine. We found of the businesses that are registered in here of the 20-something businesses, 10 of them are home health care businesses As you can see, Prestige Home Care, Bright Star Home Care, Atlanta Community Support, Five Stars Home Health Care, Prime Home Care, LLC. It's a trend we saw in Minnesota, one that the Minnesota House Oversight Committee on Fraud — Large clusters of healthcare providers in one location. This building right behind me has 22 different home and community-based healthcare companies registered in the building Inside this Portland office building — I think I got 10 healthcare companies — Healthcare, healthcare, healthcare, home healthcare.“

WOW 🚨 Entire office buildings are being discovered in Portland Maine, each on packed with home health care companies that are “rarely staffed” Multiple buildings with 20-22+ home health care companies found IN ONE BUILDING “It's the same thing that we're finding in Minnesota, just to be completely blunt, the same tactics being used to defraud Medicaid. In this case, Zombie offices, I call them, where large clusters of home health care businesses and providers in one location. We saw them in Minnesota and we're seeing them here and the business owners and building owners that we speak to here say, enough. We're here in Portland, Maine. We found of the businesses that are registered in here of the 20-something businesses, 10 of them are home health care businesses As you can see, Prestige Home Care, Bright Star Home Care, Atlanta Community Support, Five Stars Home Health Care, Prime Home Care, LLC. It's a trend we saw in Minnesota, one that the Minnesota House Oversight Committee on Fraud — Large clusters of healthcare providers in one location. This building right behind me has 22 different home and community-based healthcare companies registered in the building Inside this Portland office building — I think I got 10 healthcare companies — Healthcare, healthcare, healthcare, home healthcare.“

Wall Street Apes

862,072 views • 6 months ago

GSP says he lives by something called the 24 hour rule: 8 sleep. 8 work. 8 for the people you love "There are 24 hours in a day. I learned you need to separate your day into three parts: 8 hours sleep, 8 hours work, 8 hours for the people you love" "Before, I never did this. I was always mixing everything up, eating with my family while I was on the phone, bringing my training problems home, bringing my home problems to the gym. The stress took over. I didn't have time to sleep" "A friend taught me to compartmentalize, one part doesn't flow into the other. Of course sometimes work takes more and sleep less, but generally you need the time off. Otherwise you'll eventually go crazy" "When I started doing this, it changed everything. It created balance"

GSP says he lives by something called the 24 hour rule: 8 sleep. 8 work. 8 for the people you love "There are 24 hours in a day. I learned you need to separate your day into three parts: 8 hours sleep, 8 hours work, 8 hours for the people you love" "Before, I never did this. I was always mixing everything up, eating with my family while I was on the phone, bringing my training problems home, bringing my home problems to the gym. The stress took over. I didn't have time to sleep" "A friend taught me to compartmentalize, one part doesn't flow into the other. Of course sometimes work takes more and sleep less, but generally you need the time off. Otherwise you'll eventually go crazy" "When I started doing this, it changed everything. It created balance"

katsu

51,510 views • 2 months ago

BREAKING: THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO TO WATCH IF YOU ARE INVESTED IN QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANIES. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT The world's leading quantum computing researcher Scott Aaronson calls out the scams and snakeoilmen in the public quantum computing stock market. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT - "The most important thing that I can say in this whole interview, if I am taking to Retail investors is that unfortunately there are companies that I see that are really trying to solve the hardware problems, they might succeed, they might fail but they are really focused on solving the real problems and talking about it more or less honestly" - "and then there are companies that have focused on like marketing themselves to Retail investors and doing IPO's" i.e. the 4 public quantum computing companies IONQ, Rigetti, D-Wave and QUBT. - "and I see these 2 sets of companies being mostly disjoint from each other" - "So the companies that have focused on doing IPO's are actually not the ones that are in the lead on in the hardware, what they are in the lead on is selling a narrative to people...... - "convincing people this is already useful for solving problems in optimization and machine learning and finance, which sounds great to people, but all depends on you agreeing to not ask the question Q. well could a classical computer have done that just as well, could a classical computer actually have done that much faster and easier " "When people are talking about that the big use of a quantum computer is to solve optimization or machine learning problems or to turbo charge AI, or it can already do this, it's already delivering value to customers...." "these are the tells you are dealing with a SNAKEOIL SALESMAN" He calls out the "scammy" companies in this space! Remember the only 4 quantum pure play companies that have IPO'd are $IONQ $RGTI $QUBT $QBTS He also says earlier in the interview “I would say $IONQ has not demonstrated anything in trapped ion hardware close to what Quantinuum has demonstrated in the last year” YOU ARE BEING LIED TO! Full video in comments from the The Quantum Bull

BREAKING: THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO TO WATCH IF YOU ARE INVESTED IN QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANIES. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT The world's leading quantum computing researcher Scott Aaronson calls out the scams and snakeoilmen in the public quantum computing stock market. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT - "The most important thing that I can say in this whole interview, if I am taking to Retail investors is that unfortunately there are companies that I see that are really trying to solve the hardware problems, they might succeed, they might fail but they are really focused on solving the real problems and talking about it more or less honestly" - "and then there are companies that have focused on like marketing themselves to Retail investors and doing IPO's" i.e. the 4 public quantum computing companies IONQ, Rigetti, D-Wave and QUBT. - "and I see these 2 sets of companies being mostly disjoint from each other" - "So the companies that have focused on doing IPO's are actually not the ones that are in the lead on in the hardware, what they are in the lead on is selling a narrative to people...... - "convincing people this is already useful for solving problems in optimization and machine learning and finance, which sounds great to people, but all depends on you agreeing to not ask the question Q. well could a classical computer have done that just as well, could a classical computer actually have done that much faster and easier " "When people are talking about that the big use of a quantum computer is to solve optimization or machine learning problems or to turbo charge AI, or it can already do this, it's already delivering value to customers...." "these are the tells you are dealing with a SNAKEOIL SALESMAN" He calls out the "scammy" companies in this space! Remember the only 4 quantum pure play companies that have IPO'd are $IONQ $RGTI $QUBT $QBTS He also says earlier in the interview “I would say $IONQ has not demonstrated anything in trapped ion hardware close to what Quantinuum has demonstrated in the last year” YOU ARE BEING LIED TO! Full video in comments from the The Quantum Bull

Common Sense Investor (CSI)

140,077 views • 7 months ago

🚨 READ THIS CAREFULLY Bitcoin’s next cycle bottom won’t be where you think. The part most people ignore: Timing. Days from market cycle top → bottom: 2012: 405 days 2016: 362 days 2020: 376 days We haven’t reached that timing zone yet in this cycle. Purely on historical timing, the highest-probability window for the real bottom is July–November 2026. That matters more than any single number on your chart. Most traders only operate on price: “I’ll buy at X.” But the zone that feels “safe” is usually the zone where people do nothing. I don’t play that game. Below $50,000 I’m a buyer. Regardless of when it happens. July–November 2026 I’m a buyer. Regardless of price. If either condition is met, I buy. No hesitation. Yes, I started accumulating as soon as we entered the $60k range last month, even though the timing window isn’t here yet. Back in October, when Bitcoin was around $120,000, I said I’d be a strong buyer near $60k. People laughed. Sentiment was euphoric: “BTC will never see $100k again.” Now we’re here. There’s one more thing most people keep ignoring: NUPL. Every generational bottom: 2018, COVID, 2022, happened when NUPL entered the blue zone. We’re not there yet. For the record, I was the only one publicly calling the exact bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

🚨 READ THIS CAREFULLY Bitcoin’s next cycle bottom won’t be where you think. The part most people ignore: Timing. Days from market cycle top → bottom: 2012: 405 days 2016: 362 days 2020: 376 days We haven’t reached that timing zone yet in this cycle. Purely on historical timing, the highest-probability window for the real bottom is July–November 2026. That matters more than any single number on your chart. Most traders only operate on price: “I’ll buy at X.” But the zone that feels “safe” is usually the zone where people do nothing. I don’t play that game. Below $50,000 I’m a buyer. Regardless of when it happens. July–November 2026 I’m a buyer. Regardless of price. If either condition is met, I buy. No hesitation. Yes, I started accumulating as soon as we entered the $60k range last month, even though the timing window isn’t here yet. Back in October, when Bitcoin was around $120,000, I said I’d be a strong buyer near $60k. People laughed. Sentiment was euphoric: “BTC will never see $100k again.” Now we’re here. There’s one more thing most people keep ignoring: NUPL. Every generational bottom: 2018, COVID, 2022, happened when NUPL entered the blue zone. We’re not there yet. For the record, I was the only one publicly calling the exact bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

1,360,895 views • 4 months ago

It’s a new week, and many people are considering starting their building projects. One thing I’ve observed is that most project challenges don’t begin during construction, they begin long before the brief is even properly defined. Questions like: Is the budget realistic? Am I truly prepared to start this project? Which professional competence can I rely on to guide me through it? When these are not clearly addressed at the outset, the project becomes much harder to control in terms of cost, time, and quality. Proper planning and early professional input make the entire process more predictable, structured, and efficient. And one key principle to always remember: the best way to save cost in construction is to do it right the first time.

It’s a new week, and many people are considering starting their building projects. One thing I’ve observed is that most project challenges don’t begin during construction, they begin long before the brief is even properly defined. Questions like: Is the budget realistic? Am I truly prepared to start this project? Which professional competence can I rely on to guide me through it? When these are not clearly addressed at the outset, the project becomes much harder to control in terms of cost, time, and quality. Proper planning and early professional input make the entire process more predictable, structured, and efficient. And one key principle to always remember: the best way to save cost in construction is to do it right the first time.

ConstructionPM🪖 ✨

20,417 views • 3 months ago

Reporter: You were the driving force behind operation warp speed, the mrna vaccines that are the gold standard. Your health secretary is pulling back all the funding for research. He is saying that the risks outweigh the benefits, which puts him at odds with the entire medical community and you. Trump: Research on what? Reporter: MRNA Vaccines Trump: We’re going to look at that. Operation warp speed, whether you are a Republican or Democrat, considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country. We are looking at other answers to other problems, other sicknesses and diseases. And I think we are doing really well.

Reporter: You were the driving force behind operation warp speed, the mrna vaccines that are the gold standard. Your health secretary is pulling back all the funding for research. He is saying that the risks outweigh the benefits, which puts him at odds with the entire medical community and you. Trump: Research on what? Reporter: MRNA Vaccines Trump: We’re going to look at that. Operation warp speed, whether you are a Republican or Democrat, considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country. We are looking at other answers to other problems, other sicknesses and diseases. And I think we are doing really well.

Acyn

254,405 views • 1 year ago

One line from Thomas Sowell completely rewired how Konstantin Kisin sees the world: “There are no solutions, only trade-offs.” Kisin says we’ve lost the ability to think like this. We treat every big issue — climate change, the NHS, COVID lockdowns, free speech — as if it has a perfect fix. But every policy, every choice, comes with real costs. Locking down might save some lives but costs others. More free speech means some people will get offended. Trying to “solve” complex problems usually just moves the pain around. The brutal truth? Most of our loud political shouting matches are childish because they pretend one side can magically eliminate problems that are eternal. Once you internalize “no solutions, only trade-offs,” a lot of the noise starts sounding ridiculous. What’s a trade-off you’ve had to accept recently — in politics, health, career, or relationships — that made you realise there really are no pure wins?

One line from Thomas Sowell completely rewired how Konstantin Kisin sees the world: “There are no solutions, only trade-offs.” Kisin says we’ve lost the ability to think like this. We treat every big issue — climate change, the NHS, COVID lockdowns, free speech — as if it has a perfect fix. But every policy, every choice, comes with real costs. Locking down might save some lives but costs others. More free speech means some people will get offended. Trying to “solve” complex problems usually just moves the pain around. The brutal truth? Most of our loud political shouting matches are childish because they pretend one side can magically eliminate problems that are eternal. Once you internalize “no solutions, only trade-offs,” a lot of the noise starts sounding ridiculous. What’s a trade-off you’ve had to accept recently — in politics, health, career, or relationships — that made you realise there really are no pure wins?

Camus

196,182 views • 4 months ago