正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

One thing I've learned is that having a skill and earning from it are not always the same thing. There are so many talented Digital Marketers, Graphic Designers, UI/UX Designers, and Video Editors out there who just need the right opportunities and support to take their careers to the...

_Taaooma's profile picture

MONKELE

1,518,829 subscribers

25,448 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."
6:11

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 次观看 • 4 个月前

8 million directors are currently being forced with One Login onto digital ID, and this is not something that's been discussed. And this is the problem with this government. It’s disregard and contempt for the public. The idea you don't need to put in a manifesto and argue and convince people what you're going to do, or even if you have done that, you'll just do a U-turn on it. And if you make promises like to the farmers, you'll just not do it and do a 180 on it. this is particularly true of things like facial ID They're saying it's not mandatory. But effectively if you've got 8 million directors that are being forced to do one login and then it's being used across the board with different agencies, effectively it becomes a thing that you need to do to participate, and a complete obsession with trying to follow what's happened in Australia and Europe's now pushing this as well. You get age gating on the internet, so we have to basically prove who we are to just participate in the digital public sphere. And that's why this, coming Saturday week, we've got, the Four Nations rally to scrap digital ID day, and we're saying it together. We must have a digital bill of rights. Just the fundamental thing. We must have the right not to have to digitally verify, not to have to digitally prove who we are to exist or to participate. There's over 3 million people who are older who don't, go online. But it shouldn't just be that or people who come up with vulnerabilities. These are choices, and we can't allow a situation that. But de facto, we're forced into doing this where we then see lots of surveillance, lots of control, and lots of data breaches. Mike. So this rally is going to be hugely important. Cities in the Four Nations, Belfast, city town hall outside that, outside Holyrood and Edinburgh, outside the Senedd in Cardiff and a really big rally at Trafalgar Square where we got speakers and performers It starts at 2:00. If people get there at 130, this is going to be a sending a message directly to Keir Starmer in this government and also to anyone else that, the May 7th elections, we've been going around the country saying that digital I.D. is a key part of these concerns. And we know people are concerned quite rightly, about potholes, low traffic, Low Traffic neighborhoods of which digital I.D. will be connected to. there's been a big populist uprising, which is very exciting. But we're saying that front and center people should keep putting pressure on, potential candidates. Standing on what? Their position on digital ideas. And it's so important they should make their vote on that. So we've been going around the country, we've got leaflets and fliers, Hundreds of thousands of fliers have gone out. We've got teams around Britain saying that 7th of May, let's make sure we take back democracy and put no digital I.D. at the heart of it. So this four rallies, the scrap digital I.D. rallies on the 25th Saturday, the 25th of April. we're going to continue, challenging, this and insisting on it. , there's going to be some more surprises over the next week and people are going to see much more about it, but we encourage everyone to make sure that they let their potential candidates know this is a crucial issue to them, and they'll be voting on this issue. #notodigitalid #together Mike Graham 🇬🇧
3:35

8 million directors are currently being forced with One Login onto digital ID, and this is not something that's been discussed. And this is the problem with this government. It’s disregard and contempt for the public. The idea you don't need to put in a manifesto and argue and convince people what you're going to do, or even if you have done that, you'll just do a U-turn on it. And if you make promises like to the farmers, you'll just not do it and do a 180 on it. this is particularly true of things like facial ID They're saying it's not mandatory. But effectively if you've got 8 million directors that are being forced to do one login and then it's being used across the board with different agencies, effectively it becomes a thing that you need to do to participate, and a complete obsession with trying to follow what's happened in Australia and Europe's now pushing this as well. You get age gating on the internet, so we have to basically prove who we are to just participate in the digital public sphere. And that's why this, coming Saturday week, we've got, the Four Nations rally to scrap digital ID day, and we're saying it together. We must have a digital bill of rights. Just the fundamental thing. We must have the right not to have to digitally verify, not to have to digitally prove who we are to exist or to participate. There's over 3 million people who are older who don't, go online. But it shouldn't just be that or people who come up with vulnerabilities. These are choices, and we can't allow a situation that. But de facto, we're forced into doing this where we then see lots of surveillance, lots of control, and lots of data breaches. Mike. So this rally is going to be hugely important. Cities in the Four Nations, Belfast, city town hall outside that, outside Holyrood and Edinburgh, outside the Senedd in Cardiff and a really big rally at Trafalgar Square where we got speakers and performers It starts at 2:00. If people get there at 130, this is going to be a sending a message directly to Keir Starmer in this government and also to anyone else that, the May 7th elections, we've been going around the country saying that digital I.D. is a key part of these concerns. And we know people are concerned quite rightly, about potholes, low traffic, Low Traffic neighborhoods of which digital I.D. will be connected to. there's been a big populist uprising, which is very exciting. But we're saying that front and center people should keep putting pressure on, potential candidates. Standing on what? Their position on digital ideas. And it's so important they should make their vote on that. So we've been going around the country, we've got leaflets and fliers, Hundreds of thousands of fliers have gone out. We've got teams around Britain saying that 7th of May, let's make sure we take back democracy and put no digital I.D. at the heart of it. So this four rallies, the scrap digital I.D. rallies on the 25th Saturday, the 25th of April. we're going to continue, challenging, this and insisting on it. , there's going to be some more surprises over the next week and people are going to see much more about it, but we encourage everyone to make sure that they let their potential candidates know this is a crucial issue to them, and they'll be voting on this issue. #notodigitalid #together Mike Graham 🇬🇧

Alan D Miller

14,428 次观看 • 5 个月前

I run a mentorship program every year for people looking to grow their Cybersecurity career. Here are a few things to note about my mentorship program. Kindly share with anyone who is looking for a mentorship opportunity. My mentorship program is cohort based. Applications will start by September this year and the mentorship will kick off in November. I will admit 40 people in the new cohort (20 males. 20 females). There is no age limit. It is fully remote (Your nationality or location does not matter). The main criteria is people who are passionate about Cybersecurity. With my mentorship, one thing is certain, you will grow and learn Cybersecurity. You will have unlimited access to me. You can always reach out to me with your questions and one thing is certain, I will respond. My mentees work in groups. If you are not a Team Player, don’t apply for my mentorship program. If you join my mentorship program and you are actively searching for a Cybersecurity job, I will do my best to support you. My mentorship program is 100% free.
1:17

I run a mentorship program every year for people looking to grow their Cybersecurity career. Here are a few things to note about my mentorship program. Kindly share with anyone who is looking for a mentorship opportunity. My mentorship program is cohort based. Applications will start by September this year and the mentorship will kick off in November. I will admit 40 people in the new cohort (20 males. 20 females). There is no age limit. It is fully remote (Your nationality or location does not matter). The main criteria is people who are passionate about Cybersecurity. With my mentorship, one thing is certain, you will grow and learn Cybersecurity. You will have unlimited access to me. You can always reach out to me with your questions and one thing is certain, I will respond. My mentees work in groups. If you are not a Team Player, don’t apply for my mentorship program. If you join my mentorship program and you are actively searching for a Cybersecurity job, I will do my best to support you. My mentorship program is 100% free.

Dr Iretioluwa Akerele

68,024 次观看 • 1 年前

“I’m a lawyer, and my advice is that it’s good to be in Ghana because there are many opportunities there. If you’re thinking about overstaying after being granted a one- or two-year visa, don’t do it. I’ve been to many countries, and I can confidently say that Ghana is the best of them all.” — A Ghanaian lawyer in the United States advises Ghanaians who travelled to the U.S. for the World Cup to return home after their visit, saying there are numerous opportunities in Ghana and describing it as the best and “sweetest” country despite having visited many others.
1:43

“I’m a lawyer, and my advice is that it’s good to be in Ghana because there are many opportunities there. If you’re thinking about overstaying after being granted a one- or two-year visa, don’t do it. I’ve been to many countries, and I can confidently say that Ghana is the best of them all.” — A Ghanaian lawyer in the United States advises Ghanaians who travelled to the U.S. for the World Cup to return home after their visit, saying there are numerous opportunities in Ghana and describing it as the best and “sweetest” country despite having visited many others.

𝐀𝐒𝐊

156,550 次观看 • 2 个月前

Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, on why AI is both a bubble and a revolution at the same time: His answer refuses the binary, laying out why both things can be true at once: "I mean, clearly, it's clearly both, right? It's clearly a bubble and at the same time, it's very interesting and I think it will change society and I think it will change how most skilled jobs get done." But he pushes back on the maximalist framing: "At the same time, I don't think it's as revolutionary as people make it out to be." When asked about artists being angry that AI models were trained on their work without consent, Linus is blunt: "That's reality. Deal with it. That genie is out of the bottle. You're not getting it back. And you're not getting it back whether you are a photographer who's out of work… or you're a programmer that has to learn to deal with a new reality." On programming specifically, he's more optimistic, though he has a sharp caveat about vibe coding: "I really think that AI will be a tool and it will make people more productive. I think that vibe coding is great for getting into programming. I think it's going to be a horrible thing to maintain." His conclusion is that programmers aren't going anywhere: "You still want to have the people who know how to maintain the end result." Linus separates the technology from the noise around it: "I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the whole things going on around AI. I find the marketing and the market to be sick and twisted and there is going to be a crash and it's not… it's going to be ugly."
1:59

Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, on why AI is both a bubble and a revolution at the same time: His answer refuses the binary, laying out why both things can be true at once: "I mean, clearly, it's clearly both, right? It's clearly a bubble and at the same time, it's very interesting and I think it will change society and I think it will change how most skilled jobs get done." But he pushes back on the maximalist framing: "At the same time, I don't think it's as revolutionary as people make it out to be." When asked about artists being angry that AI models were trained on their work without consent, Linus is blunt: "That's reality. Deal with it. That genie is out of the bottle. You're not getting it back. And you're not getting it back whether you are a photographer who's out of work… or you're a programmer that has to learn to deal with a new reality." On programming specifically, he's more optimistic, though he has a sharp caveat about vibe coding: "I really think that AI will be a tool and it will make people more productive. I think that vibe coding is great for getting into programming. I think it's going to be a horrible thing to maintain." His conclusion is that programmers aren't going anywhere: "You still want to have the people who know how to maintain the end result." Linus separates the technology from the noise around it: "I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the whole things going on around AI. I find the marketing and the market to be sick and twisted and there is going to be a crash and it's not… it's going to be ugly."

Big Brain AI

52,726 次观看 • 4 个月前

Our ICT Hub is Set to Launch… and It’s Absolutely FREE! We’re excited to announce that the Agboyi-Ketu ICT Hub is officially ready and we’re about to open up applications for FREE tech training sessions! Get ready to gain hands-on skills in high-demand areas such as: Desktop Publishing Object-Oriented Programming Graphic Design Data Analysis Digital Marketing UI/UX Design …and much more! This is your chance to be part of a transformative initiative empowering our youth and community with real opportunities in the digital space. The Co-working space will be open for use too! Stay glued to this space for updates on the application process.
1:34

Our ICT Hub is Set to Launch… and It’s Absolutely FREE! We’re excited to announce that the Agboyi-Ketu ICT Hub is officially ready and we’re about to open up applications for FREE tech training sessions! Get ready to gain hands-on skills in high-demand areas such as: Desktop Publishing Object-Oriented Programming Graphic Design Data Analysis Digital Marketing UI/UX Design …and much more! This is your chance to be part of a transformative initiative empowering our youth and community with real opportunities in the digital space. The Co-working space will be open for use too! Stay glued to this space for updates on the application process.

Mayor Dele Oshinowo

18,300 次观看 • 1 年前

‘it is.’ was released 10 years ago today. The album to me was meant to talk about what everything is. It just ‘is’. Whether you do it or don’t. So why not do it? “You are a human being, so ‘be’.” Things will continue to change around me as well as within me. All I can do is try to be what I want to be more and more everyday. And continue to send out my communications through music. I’m grateful to everyone that has received and/or will receive the messages in the future. Thank you to all who have supported and will support in the future — love y’all.
0:42

‘it is.’ was released 10 years ago today. The album to me was meant to talk about what everything is. It just ‘is’. Whether you do it or don’t. So why not do it? “You are a human being, so ‘be’.” Things will continue to change around me as well as within me. All I can do is try to be what I want to be more and more everyday. And continue to send out my communications through music. I’m grateful to everyone that has received and/or will receive the messages in the future. Thank you to all who have supported and will support in the future — love y’all.

JMSN

12,020 次观看 • 4 个月前

I Like Living among People—Plumbers, Truckers, Farmers—Who Deal with the Real Economy and Real Assets There is something valuable about being close to people who work in the real economy. Plumbers, truckers, farmers, builders and countless other people do work that produces something tangible and keeps communities functioning every day. In this extract from our interview with Craig Tindale, the importance of being around those people is contrasted with the increasingly financialised and technology-driven parts of the economy. It is a useful reminder that beneath all of the markets, financial products and digital systems, there is still a real economy made up of people providing goods and services to one another. Cash has a natural place in that economy because it allows money to move directly between people and businesses in their everyday lives. When you pay a local farmer, shopkeeper, tradesperson or independent business with cash, you are participating in that real economy without every transaction needing to pass through a digital payment system. This means remembering that the financial system ultimately exists to support the people, businesses and communities that make up the economy itself. Watch the full interview with Craig Tindale: Cash Freedom 2026: Subscribe to
1:14

I Like Living among People—Plumbers, Truckers, Farmers—Who Deal with the Real Economy and Real Assets There is something valuable about being close to people who work in the real economy. Plumbers, truckers, farmers, builders and countless other people do work that produces something tangible and keeps communities functioning every day. In this extract from our interview with Craig Tindale, the importance of being around those people is contrasted with the increasingly financialised and technology-driven parts of the economy. It is a useful reminder that beneath all of the markets, financial products and digital systems, there is still a real economy made up of people providing goods and services to one another. Cash has a natural place in that economy because it allows money to move directly between people and businesses in their everyday lives. When you pay a local farmer, shopkeeper, tradesperson or independent business with cash, you are participating in that real economy without every transaction needing to pass through a digital payment system. This means remembering that the financial system ultimately exists to support the people, businesses and communities that make up the economy itself. Watch the full interview with Craig Tindale: Cash Freedom 2026: Subscribe to

The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

18,421 次观看 • 22 天前

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”
3:50

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

Jack Prescott

31,665 次观看 • 1 个月前

Asmongold explains why helping Venezuela after the earthquake is the smartest strategic move Trump can make "This is the perfect time for us to come in and try to help them out with disaster relief. We want to make sure our relationship with Venezuela is a lot stronger and that the people there are like, okay, America is actually here to help us and not just take our oil." "We want to unlock international trade with Venezuela in a way that's beneficial for the United States. That benefit is reduced when the country is rubble. We don't get as much out of the country if it looks like Gaza." "It shows people in countries like Iran or Cuba that if the US takes an interest in your country, there will be a positive windfall from it as well."
1:55

Asmongold explains why helping Venezuela after the earthquake is the smartest strategic move Trump can make "This is the perfect time for us to come in and try to help them out with disaster relief. We want to make sure our relationship with Venezuela is a lot stronger and that the people there are like, okay, America is actually here to help us and not just take our oil." "We want to unlock international trade with Venezuela in a way that's beneficial for the United States. That benefit is reduced when the country is rubble. We don't get as much out of the country if it looks like Gaza." "It shows people in countries like Iran or Cuba that if the US takes an interest in your country, there will be a positive windfall from it as well."

Asmongold Updates

91,269 次观看 • 3 个月前

Black Mirror: It's Closer Than You Think One of the most memorable scenes in Black Mirror's “Nosedive” is that Lacie's digital social ranking isn't simply a reflection of how other people see her. It determines what she can access. When her score drops, she finds that it can affect everything from the car she can rent to whether she can get on a flight. The episode raises a very real question about what happens when digital systems become the gateway to everyday life. The more aspects of our lives depend on a single digital infrastructure, the more important it becomes to have alternatives when that system isn't available — or when we don't want to participate in it. That is part of the reason cash matters. Digital payments are convenient, but they shouldn't have to be the only way we can transact. Cash gives people another option that doesn't depend on a digital account, a payment network or a particular technology. We don't need to reject digital payments to recognise the value of keeping cash. The important thing is making sure that convenience doesn't eventually become the removal of choice. Cash is one of the few alternatives we still have, and keeping it available means keeping that choice available. Cash Freedom 2026: Subscribe to
2:52

Black Mirror: It's Closer Than You Think One of the most memorable scenes in Black Mirror's “Nosedive” is that Lacie's digital social ranking isn't simply a reflection of how other people see her. It determines what she can access. When her score drops, she finds that it can affect everything from the car she can rent to whether she can get on a flight. The episode raises a very real question about what happens when digital systems become the gateway to everyday life. The more aspects of our lives depend on a single digital infrastructure, the more important it becomes to have alternatives when that system isn't available — or when we don't want to participate in it. That is part of the reason cash matters. Digital payments are convenient, but they shouldn't have to be the only way we can transact. Cash gives people another option that doesn't depend on a digital account, a payment network or a particular technology. We don't need to reject digital payments to recognise the value of keeping cash. The important thing is making sure that convenience doesn't eventually become the removal of choice. Cash is one of the few alternatives we still have, and keeping it available means keeping that choice available. Cash Freedom 2026: Subscribe to

The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

53,114 次观看 • 25 天前

Here’s what the communication was like after Helene hit WNC. It’s beyond horrible, and these people still need so much help. So many there believe they have been forgotten. That’s so sad. There are people in our state and federal government who need to see the inside of a jail cell for a long time. Do you think it’s a coincidence that there is land the government wanted, and it just so happens that this same land gets flooded? Problem solved…All the people who wouldn’t sell are not a problem now. They are either gone or everything they owned is gone with no way to rebuild. COINCIDENCE?
2:20

Here’s what the communication was like after Helene hit WNC. It’s beyond horrible, and these people still need so much help. So many there believe they have been forgotten. That’s so sad. There are people in our state and federal government who need to see the inside of a jail cell for a long time. Do you think it’s a coincidence that there is land the government wanted, and it just so happens that this same land gets flooded? Problem solved…All the people who wouldn’t sell are not a problem now. They are either gone or everything they owned is gone with no way to rebuild. COINCIDENCE?

Lisa 🌹💃🏻

79,506 次观看 • 1 年前

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."
7:10

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."

Joe Murgia

31,404 次观看 • 2 个月前

The GNU and their foerign handlers are setting up the conditions that will make people beg for digital IDs because "We will be able to control immigration so much better, with the ability to verify identities intsantaneous". What they won't tell you is that your health info and finances will be tied to the same digital ID in a few years when the system has been adopted by the majority. Then when you criticize government, they can simply stop your ability to buy anything or access any services. It is not just SA. It's global.
5:38

The GNU and their foerign handlers are setting up the conditions that will make people beg for digital IDs because "We will be able to control immigration so much better, with the ability to verify identities intsantaneous". What they won't tell you is that your health info and finances will be tied to the same digital ID in a few years when the system has been adopted by the majority. Then when you criticize government, they can simply stop your ability to buy anything or access any services. It is not just SA. It's global.

André

39,613 次观看 • 4 个月前

Elon Musk: I'll be long dead before we're really a multiplanet species. But at least I'd like to see us make great progress in this direction. “Why do these things? I think this is important for maximizing the probable lifespan of humanity or consciousness. Human civilization could come to an end for external reasons, like a giant meteor, or supervolcanoes, or extreme climate change. Or World War III, or, you know, any one of a number of reasons. But the probable lifespan of civilization and consciousness, as we know it, which we should really view as this very delicate thing, like a small candle in a vast darkness, that is what appears to be the case. We're in this vast darkness of space, and there's this little candle of consciousness that's only really come about after 4.5 billion years. And it could just go out. I think that's powerful, and I think a lot of people will be inspired by that vision. And so the reason you need the million people is because there has to be enough people there to do everything that you need to survive. The critical threshold is, if the ships from Earth stop coming for any reason, does the Mars city die out or not? We have to pass that. People talk about the great filters, the things that perhaps, you know, we talk about the Fermi paradox and where are the aliens, and, well, maybe there is various great filters that the aliens didn't pass, and so they eventually just cease to exist. And one of the great filters is becoming a multiplanet species. So we want to pass that filter. And I'll be long dead before this is a real thing, before it happens. But I'd like to at least see us make great progress in this direction.” Source: TED, April 6, 2022.
2:05

Elon Musk: I'll be long dead before we're really a multiplanet species. But at least I'd like to see us make great progress in this direction. “Why do these things? I think this is important for maximizing the probable lifespan of humanity or consciousness. Human civilization could come to an end for external reasons, like a giant meteor, or supervolcanoes, or extreme climate change. Or World War III, or, you know, any one of a number of reasons. But the probable lifespan of civilization and consciousness, as we know it, which we should really view as this very delicate thing, like a small candle in a vast darkness, that is what appears to be the case. We're in this vast darkness of space, and there's this little candle of consciousness that's only really come about after 4.5 billion years. And it could just go out. I think that's powerful, and I think a lot of people will be inspired by that vision. And so the reason you need the million people is because there has to be enough people there to do everything that you need to survive. The critical threshold is, if the ships from Earth stop coming for any reason, does the Mars city die out or not? We have to pass that. People talk about the great filters, the things that perhaps, you know, we talk about the Fermi paradox and where are the aliens, and, well, maybe there is various great filters that the aliens didn't pass, and so they eventually just cease to exist. And one of the great filters is becoming a multiplanet species. So we want to pass that filter. And I'll be long dead before this is a real thing, before it happens. But I'd like to at least see us make great progress in this direction.” Source: TED, April 6, 2022.

ELON CLIPS

36,981 次观看 • 2 个月前

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”
1:31

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

neandrewthal

74,654 次观看 • 1 年前

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”
0:50

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

RedWave Press

53,415 次观看 • 10 个月前

Elon Musk: Do we want to be in many worlds, or forever confined to Earth? “There are so many things to worry about, so many things to be concerned about. There are many troubles in the world, of course, and these are important, and we need to solve them. But we also need things that make us excited to be alive, that make us glad to wake up in the morning and be fired up about the future and think the future is going to be great. Space exploration is one of those things. Becoming a space-faring civilization, being out there among the stars, this is one of the things that I know makes me glad to be alive. I think it makes many people glad to be alive. It's one of the best things. Really, we're faced with a choice: Which future do you want? Do you want a future where we become a space-faring civilization and are in many worlds and are out there among the stars, or one where we are forever confined to Earth? I say it is the first. And I hope you agree with me.” Starship Update, September 2019
0:59

Elon Musk: Do we want to be in many worlds, or forever confined to Earth? “There are so many things to worry about, so many things to be concerned about. There are many troubles in the world, of course, and these are important, and we need to solve them. But we also need things that make us excited to be alive, that make us glad to wake up in the morning and be fired up about the future and think the future is going to be great. Space exploration is one of those things. Becoming a space-faring civilization, being out there among the stars, this is one of the things that I know makes me glad to be alive. I think it makes many people glad to be alive. It's one of the best things. Really, we're faced with a choice: Which future do you want? Do you want a future where we become a space-faring civilization and are in many worlds and are out there among the stars, or one where we are forever confined to Earth? I say it is the first. And I hope you agree with me.” Starship Update, September 2019

ELON CLIPS

1,684,250 次观看 • 1 年前

Seattle Seahawks HC Mike Macdonald - Scouting Pass Protections - "You're really just trying to get what their rule is to start when they leave the huddle. What do I want to present them with because how am I going to anticipate how they're going to react based on the looks they've gotten in the past, the looks we've given them and then we can go to work." - "You definitely have to account for 7 man protection. You'll find the more you blitz, the more 7 man you're going to see. - "Those are decisions you have to make when you're building your plan. We know that we're getting this protection when they give us this formation and we got a sweet pressure that will hit them to do it, there is a spot and a time and place for that." -"There is a time & place for saying I'm not sure when they're going to go to 7 man, even if we're in 5 man rush, our dudes can get there. We're going to at least have a couple 1 on 1s that we can win. Let's not overdo it with all these checks and all this other BS so our guys can just go out there and execute the call, there is a space for that as well." -"And then there is also a space for hey we're brining two off the edge right here, they're going to have this picked up, why even run against the wall, let's check out of it and go to rush and coverage and double 2/3 guys running a route. Those are the questions you want to ask yourself throughout the week and a lot of times it comes down to whether or not you can anticipate them being in that particular thing."
2:40

Seattle Seahawks HC Mike Macdonald - Scouting Pass Protections - "You're really just trying to get what their rule is to start when they leave the huddle. What do I want to present them with because how am I going to anticipate how they're going to react based on the looks they've gotten in the past, the looks we've given them and then we can go to work." - "You definitely have to account for 7 man protection. You'll find the more you blitz, the more 7 man you're going to see. - "Those are decisions you have to make when you're building your plan. We know that we're getting this protection when they give us this formation and we got a sweet pressure that will hit them to do it, there is a spot and a time and place for that." -"There is a time & place for saying I'm not sure when they're going to go to 7 man, even if we're in 5 man rush, our dudes can get there. We're going to at least have a couple 1 on 1s that we can win. Let's not overdo it with all these checks and all this other BS so our guys can just go out there and execute the call, there is a space for that as well." -"And then there is also a space for hey we're brining two off the edge right here, they're going to have this picked up, why even run against the wall, let's check out of it and go to rush and coverage and double 2/3 guys running a route. Those are the questions you want to ask yourself throughout the week and a lot of times it comes down to whether or not you can anticipate them being in that particular thing."

James Light

67,656 次观看 • 7 个月前