Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Only a fat BBC can even fit between these heavy BBW tits. These sluts don’t close unless they’re wrapped around thick black dick, getting titty-fucked until they’re sloppy and dripping. Slide that long black cock through this cleavage and wreck these jugs. Paint them. Ruin them. These tits were...

27,567 views • 12 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

While the MSM gaslights you about there not being a connection between SSRI antidepressants and mass shooters, they're not telling you that in 2004, the FDA was forced to put a black box warning on all of them that says the following: “Anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, akathisia, hypomania, and mania have been reported in adult and pediatric patients being treated with antidepressants for major depressive disorder as well as for indications, both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric.” I wonder which one of these symptoms could lead to someone losing their mind and deciding to start murdering people en masse... These symptoms are also GREATLY exacerbated if you try to quit these drugs cold turkey as well. So if you've been taking one of these drugs for years, and then your prescription doesn't get filled on time or stop for whatever reasons, the symptoms can come on very quickly within days and then before you know it you lose yourself in a fit of violent rage and depersonalization, going on a killing spree. This is what Brooke Siem — Subscribe to my Substack described in the podcast with Mikhaila Peterson , and how she had felt this violent destructive rage when trying to quit SSRIs. How many people have experienced these symptoms and committed acts of violence? How many mass shooters were on these drugs or just got off them before they went nuts? The reason why MSM doesn't cover these issues, and nor does the government want to study the connection, is because they're completely bought by big pharma and would prefer to "not to let a good crisis go to waste" and instead weaponize these horrific events against you to take your guns.

Inversionism

153,194 views • 2 years ago

CNN’s Manu Raju: “Regime change has not gone well for the United States. Secretary of State Rubio: “The what now?” Raju: “Regime change has not gone well for the United States for many, many decades. How do you assure the American public that things will not get worse for the next regime that comes in and replaces the Ayatollah?” Rubio: “Well, we would love to see this regime be replaced. And ultimately, as the President has said —” Raju: “But how do you know that —” Rubio: “— no, no. But let me finish my answer. As the President said, he would love for the people of Iran to use this as an opportunity to rise up and remove these leaders. They’ve been wanting to remove them from a long time. We’ve seen successive waves of protests and we’ve seen them slaughtered people, okay? But the objective of this mission is to make sure they don’t have these weapons that can threaten us and our allies in the region. That’s why we’re doing what we’re doing now. And while we would love to see a new regime, the bottom line is no matter who governs that country a year from now, they’re not going to have these ballistic missiles, and they’re not going to have these drones to threaten us. That’s the objective of this mission, is to deny them the ability to use ballistic missiles, to threaten their neighbors, to threaten our bases, to threaten our presence in the region, and ultimately as a shield behind which they can do whatever they want with their nuclear weapons ambition. We were not going to let them hide behind that. And that’s why this was such a critical mission to undertake now while they were at their weakest point and not a year from now, where they could inflict even more damage and perhaps already be behind that point of immunity.”

Curtis Houck

645,671 views • 6 months ago

🚨BREAKING: This administration wants you to believe ICE is working on finding 300,000 “missing” immigrant children to save them from being trafficked… But here’s the reality: They’re hunting down unaccompanied immigrant children… and then stripping them of legal representation. (And if you’re wondering what YOU can actually do to help, links are in the comments.) These are children who came to the United States without a parent or legal guardian… Many fleeing human trafficking, persecution, neglect, abuse or abandonment. And now, the Trump administration is set to end the contracts with nearly 100 legal organizations, on July 31, which will cut off legal counsel for more than 20,000 unaccompanied children… All while funneling these CHILDREN into fast-tracked court hearings. And to make this all even more disturbing… This administration is already withholding $65 MILLION in payment, for legal work, unless those organizations turn over sensitive information about the CHILDREN they represent… Including unredacted medical evaluations and information about their broader immigration cases. A demand that puts attorneys in the impossible position of choosing between protecting these children’s confidentiality (and their ethical obligations)… or getting paid for work they have already done. And legal advocates warn that handing over this information could give the government a roadmap for mass deporting the very children they are claiming to be protecting. So, do you see what is happening? ICE is tracking down unaccompanied immigrant children. Then, the government is stripping legal counsel for unaccompanied children, demanding sensitive information about them, and speeding up their deportation proceedings… making it harder for these children to have their claims for protection fully heard, and processed. Meaning, these children, who have already survived violence, abuse, and trafficking… could be sent RIGHT BACK INTO IT. Not because they don’t qualify for protection… but because they were never given a fair chance to prove it. So, when this administration tells you they are finding these children to “ensure their safety”, don’t just listen to what they SAY they are doing… Look at what happens AFTER they find them. Because this administration isn’t protecting children. They are making it easier for vulnerable children to disappear. Go to the comments for ways you can help 👇

Jesus Freakin Congress

51,116 views • 1 month ago

"If I told you that OpenAI just announced their 'VIRTUAL HUMANS' program, planning to release 80 billion virtual humans onto the net next week, would you feel good about this? Could we even guarantee they won't instantly declare war on us? And it’s going to be worse than that. These aren’t going to be humans. These are going to be weird, alien machines with strange bugs we don’t understand. They could exhibit extremely bizarre behavior. And let’s not forget, they’re being built by for-profit corporations whose main goal is to make money. To be clear, these are being created by sociopathic entities to maximize sociopathic functions—profit. And you’ll have massive amounts of them expanding incredibly quickly. You can scale them up almost instantly. If one of them learns something, that knowledge can be sent to all the copies immediately. When one human figures something out, it doesn’t mean all of humanity knows it. But with AI, it’s different. If one AI figures something out, all AIs can know it in an instant. Even if the system itself isn’t massively smarter than a human at first, it will gain all these superpowers for free. It will be able to copy itself. It will be able to run at faster speeds. It will never get bored. It will never get tired. It doesn’t have emotions. It doesn’t need to rest. Imagine just having “a guy” who works 24/7, as smart as John von Neumann, never sleeps, never gets tired, and never gets distracted. This is already, by far, the smartest thing on the planet." -Connor Leahy on the Future of Life podcast

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

139,676 views • 1 year ago

Wim Wenders on 'Bad Day at Black Rock' (1955): "A dusty American colour film by John Sturges where everything’s so right and correct that it is almost unbearable. You could say of this John Sturges film that it doesn’t show a succession of images, but of sentences. A whole dozen of these sentences are written up in the display cases of the theatres showing 'Bad Day at Black Rock' Stills of old colour films have a peculiar charm, because they seem completely detached from the film and tend to look more like old hand coloured postcards than the actual scenes in the film. You can recognize, though, with surprise, the stills from 'Bad Day at Black Rock' when you’re watching the actual film; you can even spot the precise moment they captured. The film retains the impression that the coloured photographs have left behind. All the way through it looks hand-painted. The backdrops of the landscape that constantly show through windows or doors have more in common with paintings by Magritte than with the real landscape shown in the outdoor scenes. But even these look much more like a mile-wide, sky-high stage-set built in a gigantic studio. This endless artificiality confused me a lot at the beginning of the film, because I could only trace it back to the colours. It was only after a while that I suddenly discovered what was really happening in this film, when I saw the worn-out seats in the foyer of the hotel in Black Rock: these seats didn’t simply stand around there, they stood around as precisely the chairs that had to be there, the ashtray beside them was the only possible ashtray for these seats, the one-armed bandit was the only conceivable slot-machine for a hotel like that in a town in the Mid West. Every thing in this film, by itself, was the most exact and the most right and the most suitable that could be. Every object was so right that it could form a completely self-contained sentence, it could be distinguished from all the others around it, but for precisely this reason it suited everything else perfectly. In this film all details were really details!" ('Re: Bad Day at Black Rock', Wim Wenders, 1970)

DepressedBergman

66,878 views • 9 months ago

We’ve shared a wide range of testimonies on this show, and they’re some of my favorite episodes to do. They encourage me, and I know you guys love them too. I’m so thankful we get to tell these stories. But whenever we share a testimony like this: One of a woman who came out of that kind of lifestyle and was saved, we get a lot of chatter and criticism. I just think it’s odd that there are people who profess to follow Jesus, who had very intentional interactions with women caught in sexual sin—like the woman caught in adultery who was almost stoned, the woman He met at the well who had been married five times, and the woman who poured out her finest oil and perfume on His feet, whom Jesus praised for her faith. These people claim to follow that same Jesus, yet have such utter disdain for the women He clearly showed attended to in Scripture. Jesus praised these women for their faith when they repented, which is something we should do. Clearly, the Gospel writers, inspired by the Holy Spirit to write these inerrant, infallible words, saw fit to include these interactions with Jesus and these formerly promiscuous women. That tells us something about the importance of this kind of testimony, not only highlighting it, but also recognizing the mercy our Lord and Savior shows these women, which we should emulate in our own lives. If you walk away from a testimony thinking, “Wow, they’re really trying to make it seem like that sin isn’t a big deal. They’re trying to make people feel better about sexual immorality or promiscuity,” then you’ve completely missed it. You are the older brother in the prodigal son story. You’re missing the Gospel. You’re missing Jesus. No one on this show is making light of sin, especially not sexual sin. It damages your heart, your mind, your body, and it can have lasting consequences even after repentance. If anything, our goal is the opposite: To reach women in those situations and urge them to stop before they sell their bodies, before they’re treated like objects, before they fall deeper into promiscuity. To say, this will lead you to darkness. This is going to hurt you. You’re looking for love in all the wrong places. There’s a better way. Because you will find love, fulfillment, and identity in Christ. And for those who have walked that path, the message is this: you are not too far gone. God’s grace reaches further than your past. He can cleanse you. He can restore you. He makes you new. That is what His sacrifice does by grace, through faith. And if you don’t believe that, if you think there’s a kind of sin Christ can’t fully forgive, then you’ve missed the heart of the Gospel altogether.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

12,188 views • 5 months ago

A horrific case has emerged from West Virginia, where a white couple was arrested for subjecting the Black children they adopted to inhumane conditions, forcing them into labor akin to slavery and brutalizing them into compliance. Reports indicate that these children were routinely denied food as a form of punishment, a cruel and calculated method of control. Disturbingly, between 2019 and 2023, this couple received a staggering $318,000 in adoption subsidies—state-financed payments that essentially rewarded them for their abuse. This is not an isolated incident but a glaring example of modern-day slavery, legalized and facilitated through the U.S. adoption system. Black children, already vulnerable due to systemic disparities, are placed into white homes where they are too often subjected to cultural erasure, neglect, and, in cases like this, outright brutality. The financial incentives provided to white adoptive parents raise serious ethical concerns: Is the system truly about the well-being of Black children, or is it a pipeline that exploits them for profit under the guise of care? It is imperative that we examine and challenge the racial dynamics of adoption. The question must be asked—why is it always Black children at the mercy of white adoptive families, and not the reverse? Have we ever seen a case where a Black couple adopted white children and subjected them to such heinous treatment? If so, the instances are rare to nonexistent. This pattern is no coincidence; it reflects the lingering structures of white supremacy embedded within child welfare and adoption systems. At the very least, stringent oversight and reforms are required to prevent further exploitation of Black children. But perhaps we must also reconsider whether interracial adoption—particularly the placement of Black children into white homes—should even be permitted in a country with such a long and violent history of anti-Blackness. Until we prioritize the safety, dignity, and cultural preservation of Black children over the financial incentives for white adopters, the cycle of exploitation will continue. -Rahiem Shabazz-

IG: RahiemShabazz

397,247 views • 1 year ago