Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

⚠️ OnlyFans Is Not the Problem The demand is what keeps it alive. You can’t support it, consume it, and fund it, then be surprised by the culture it creates. Markets follow demand, and when demand changes, the market changes too.

itsmelaurin's profile picture

FlourishWithLaurin

50,814 subscribers

11,584 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Bourbon is built on time. You make it today … and hope the market still wants it years from now. That works beautifully when demand is growing. It’s a lot harder when it’s not.
2:31

Bourbon is built on time. You make it today … and hope the market still wants it years from now. That works beautifully when demand is growing. It’s a lot harder when it’s not.

Freakonomics

13,771 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NIGERIANS, FREEDOM IS NOT GIVEN FREELY BY THE OPPRESSOR, THE OPPRESSED MUST RISE DEMAND FOR IT AND TAKE IT…❗️ #EndBadGovernanceinNIGERIA 💔🇳🇬
3:29

NIGERIANS, FREEDOM IS NOT GIVEN FREELY BY THE OPPRESSOR, THE OPPRESSED MUST RISE DEMAND FOR IT AND TAKE IT…❗️ #EndBadGovernanceinNIGERIA 💔🇳🇬

Peter Akah

30,218 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Rust is the Paper Straw of Computers It solves a problem nobody had and makes everything worse. And those in power demand that you use it.
13:44

Rust is the Paper Straw of Computers It solves a problem nobody had and makes everything worse. And those in power demand that you use it.

The Lunduke Journal

19,327 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

They don't just support it, they demand it." Trump defending the Iran war spending, then pointing to $70 oil and no nukes as the payoff.
0:45

They don't just support it, they demand it." Trump defending the Iran war spending, then pointing to $70 oil and no nukes as the payoff.

Lark Davis

36,502 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The IEA just put real numbers behind the fear. Its June report, the first one to look ahead to 2027, was not really about supply. It was about demand. The agency slashed its 2026 demand growth forecast by about 700,000 barrels a day, down to roughly 1.1 million. That is not a rounding error. That is the IEA saying demand is far weaker than anyone hoped, weak enough to change the entire balance of the oil market. Then it gets worse. The first look at 2027 warns of a major supply overhang. Supply normalizing and demand eroding at the same time. A real glut of barrels next year, even bigger than the one that pushed the curve into contango last December. So strip it down. Supply coming back is the good part. Demand being this damaged is the part people keep missing. Because there are two ways oil falls. It falls because supply returns, and that is the good story. Or it falls because supply returns into a world where demand is already broken. Those are not the same thing. And the second one is not inflation. That is the whole point. When oil and the inflation markets are both plunging this fast, they are not pricing higher prices ahead. They are pricing demand coming apart.
2:23

The IEA just put real numbers behind the fear. Its June report, the first one to look ahead to 2027, was not really about supply. It was about demand. The agency slashed its 2026 demand growth forecast by about 700,000 barrels a day, down to roughly 1.1 million. That is not a rounding error. That is the IEA saying demand is far weaker than anyone hoped, weak enough to change the entire balance of the oil market. Then it gets worse. The first look at 2027 warns of a major supply overhang. Supply normalizing and demand eroding at the same time. A real glut of barrels next year, even bigger than the one that pushed the curve into contango last December. So strip it down. Supply coming back is the good part. Demand being this damaged is the part people keep missing. Because there are two ways oil falls. It falls because supply returns, and that is the good story. Or it falls because supply returns into a world where demand is already broken. Those are not the same thing. And the second one is not inflation. That is the whole point. When oil and the inflation markets are both plunging this fast, they are not pricing higher prices ahead. They are pricing demand coming apart.

Jeffrey P. Snider

16,266 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

If This Is True… 👁️ It Changes Everything We Were Taught By The Education System And The Establishment 🏫📚 And If They’re Hiding It… 🤐 Then Everything Changes ⚡️
2:54

If This Is True… 👁️ It Changes Everything We Were Taught By The Education System And The Establishment 🏫📚 And If They’re Hiding It… 🤐 Then Everything Changes ⚡️

vegastar

55,971 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

There is a Public Demand that Sant Shri Asharamji Ashram be preserved. It is not just a place, it is a living heritage of our faith. Destroying it would be a blow to culture. It is the responsibility of all of us to save it. Let us unite Save The Heritage #PreserveOurFaith
1:19

There is a Public Demand that Sant Shri Asharamji Ashram be preserved. It is not just a place, it is a living heritage of our faith. Destroying it would be a blow to culture. It is the responsibility of all of us to save it. Let us unite Save The Heritage #PreserveOurFaith

एक हिन्दुस्तानी 🚩

20,092 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THE LAST TIME COMPANIES FUNDED EACH OTHER TO INFLATE DEMAND, IT WAS CALLED THE DOT-COM BUBBLE. 🇺🇸 Today it has a new name: AI circular financing. Over $800,000,000,000 of it by 2026. Nvidia invests in OpenAI and xAI. They use the cash to buy Nvidia chips. Revenue looks strong, demand looks real, but a lot of it is the same money looping through a handful of firms. Meanwhile OpenAI is on track to lose around $14,000,000,000 this year. The boom might be real. But when the growth is this circular, the first crack in outside demand is where it unravels.
0:58

THE LAST TIME COMPANIES FUNDED EACH OTHER TO INFLATE DEMAND, IT WAS CALLED THE DOT-COM BUBBLE. 🇺🇸 Today it has a new name: AI circular financing. Over $800,000,000,000 of it by 2026. Nvidia invests in OpenAI and xAI. They use the cash to buy Nvidia chips. Revenue looks strong, demand looks real, but a lot of it is the same money looping through a handful of firms. Meanwhile OpenAI is on track to lose around $14,000,000,000 this year. The boom might be real. But when the growth is this circular, the first crack in outside demand is where it unravels.

Merlijn The Trader

23,524 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

My new indicator in action, for $RKLB. Same entry thought. Do we sweep or displace at supply or demand. In this case the 52-53 demand level was swept up, and it rocketed. It creates the boxes on the fly. Still beta testing it. But so far it’s amazing I’m not publishing it, until I fully grasp all the confluences and refine it, then I’ll make a YouTube video on how to use it. #trading
0:20

My new indicator in action, for $RKLB. Same entry thought. Do we sweep or displace at supply or demand. In this case the 52-53 demand level was swept up, and it rocketed. It creates the boxes on the fly. Still beta testing it. But so far it’s amazing I’m not publishing it, until I fully grasp all the confluences and refine it, then I’ll make a YouTube video on how to use it. #trading

Prztak

82,891 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

#CoachingMoment Coach em up!!! When you know what a kid is capable of and demand it from them they respond accordingly. Respect from a coach not earned it’s demanded. You either buy in to the culture or you ride the pine.
1:01

#CoachingMoment Coach em up!!! When you know what a kid is capable of and demand it from them they respond accordingly. Respect from a coach not earned it’s demanded. You either buy in to the culture or you ride the pine.

Down South

11,792 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.
2:06

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

235,707 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Ignore the noise and focus on the signal. This is a great economy for goods consumption and we are finally starting to see industrial demand strengthen. If the oil shock were going to impact goods demand, it would have shown up in the freight data already, as it is hyper sensitive to short-term demand shocks. The opposite is happening.
2:48

Ignore the noise and focus on the signal. This is a great economy for goods consumption and we are finally starting to see industrial demand strengthen. If the oil shock were going to impact goods demand, it would have shown up in the freight data already, as it is hyper sensitive to short-term demand shocks. The opposite is happening.

Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️

17,441 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Not everything has to be about climate change, as I made clear to the rail bureaucrats today. They must ignore the relentless nonsense and just do the job - do it properly and do it efficiently. That is what taxpayers rightly demand.
2:57

Not everything has to be about climate change, as I made clear to the rail bureaucrats today. They must ignore the relentless nonsense and just do the job - do it properly and do it efficiently. That is what taxpayers rightly demand.

Rupert Lowe MP

114,553 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

$BTC IS HEADING TO $69K AND THAT'S NOT BULLISH It is the last stop before the real dump And price is grinding toward it right now When it fills - distribution starts, longs get comfortable, then $58k breaks $58k is the last meaningful support before open air Below it there's no structure, no real demand, nothing to slow the move down That's why the dump from $58k to $45k will be faster than most people expect By the time your timeline reacts - half the move is already done The FVG fill is the signal Not the entry
0:24

$BTC IS HEADING TO $69K AND THAT'S NOT BULLISH It is the last stop before the real dump And price is grinding toward it right now When it fills - distribution starts, longs get comfortable, then $58k breaks $58k is the last meaningful support before open air Below it there's no structure, no real demand, nothing to slow the move down That's why the dump from $58k to $45k will be faster than most people expect By the time your timeline reacts - half the move is already done The FVG fill is the signal Not the entry

bee🐝

16,407 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Everyone keeps saying AI demand is peaking. They said the same thing about cloud in 2015. And mobile in 2010. And the internet in 1998. Here's why "this time is different" might actually be true — and why it might not be.
4:23

Everyone keeps saying AI demand is peaking. They said the same thing about cloud in 2015. And mobile in 2010. And the internet in 1998. Here's why "this time is different" might actually be true — and why it might not be.

SemiAnalysis

30,015 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

SILVER IS ABOUT TO REPEAT 2011. And almost nobody sees it coming. In 2011, silver went from $18 to $49 in months. Everyone was screaming "shortage" and "this is just the beginning." Then it crashed. $49 → $30 in days. Then all the way to $15. The people who bought the top never recovered. Now the same script is playing out again. Gold has already moved. Silver is chasing it. Every analyst is posting the same chart: "Gold-to-silver ratio says silver is undervalued." But here's what they're not telling you. The demand everyone is counting on is falling apart. Solar panel demand for silver is forecast to decline another 19% in 2026. The entire "shortage" thesis is built on demand that no longer exists. People think silver still has room to run. That's word for word what they said at $40 in 2011. Three months later it was $15. Tiny market, paper-thin liquidity, and moves that go vertical in both directions. When the next move becomes clear, I'll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.
0:34

SILVER IS ABOUT TO REPEAT 2011. And almost nobody sees it coming. In 2011, silver went from $18 to $49 in months. Everyone was screaming "shortage" and "this is just the beginning." Then it crashed. $49 → $30 in days. Then all the way to $15. The people who bought the top never recovered. Now the same script is playing out again. Gold has already moved. Silver is chasing it. Every analyst is posting the same chart: "Gold-to-silver ratio says silver is undervalued." But here's what they're not telling you. The demand everyone is counting on is falling apart. Solar panel demand for silver is forecast to decline another 19% in 2026. The entire "shortage" thesis is built on demand that no longer exists. People think silver still has room to run. That's word for word what they said at $40 in 2011. Three months later it was $15. Tiny market, paper-thin liquidity, and moves that go vertical in both directions. When the next move becomes clear, I'll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

Nonzee

426,550 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten