Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Open AI CEO Sam Altman: “I think we have some new technology that could just do self-driving for standard cars way better than any current approach has worked.” 🤨

455,486 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Phil Trubey's profile picture
Phil Trubey1 year ago

He’s talking out of his ass. He really doesn’t know. One of the big challenges is doing self driving without using tons of compute so that it can fit into the car’s energy budget.

SoyTeslike's profile picture
SoyTeslike1 year ago

Bro is living on a fairy tale

Phil Trubey's profile picture
Phil Trubey1 year ago

This was the original reason why Elon and Sam split on OpenAI. Elon wanted OpenAI to focus on embodied AI (robotics, self driving), while Sam wanted to work on LLMs, which eventually became ChatGPT. The irony is that both were correct, both were/are important. But at the time, they were separate research paths.

Unlimited L's's profile picture
Unlimited L's1 year ago

Scam Altman is a cockroach.

Sam Marcus's profile picture
Sam Marcus1 year ago

💩, he has no experience deciphering the vector space from cameras only

SpaceBob's profile picture
SpaceBob1 year ago

He just wants to be relevant in life.

The American Dream's profile picture
The American Dream1 year ago

Why hasn’t it been done already lmao

Daniel's profile picture
Daniel1 year ago

Quite amazing that with all advances we’ve had in AI and other technology, that it’s still really hard to create the equivalent of one really dumb human.

Michael Nurse's profile picture
Michael Nurse1 year ago

You think...? You think you have it? Why not sally on down to engineering and see if its actually there?

Related Videos

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

27,691 views • 4 days ago