Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Open Source is Anti-Free Speech The first instinct, in almost every Open Source & Linux organization - From GNOME to Arch, NixOS to openSUSE - is to censor. To mute, delete, and block any who disagree. I have the receipts.

15,749 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля The Lunduke Journal
The Lunduke Journal1 год назад

This is the post from @esrtweet that I read at the end of this show. Eric Raymond is absolutely correct in his analysis.

Фото профиля SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 год назад

🚀Want to excel in cybersecurity? Start by mastering the language of the field. 💻Interviews, exams, or everyday work—don’t get caught off guard! 🔑Unlock the key to industry-standard terms & concepts with Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone.

Фото профиля Timothy Stephens
Timothy Stephens1 год назад

It's leftism, not open-source that's censorious. It just so happens that the open-source community is rabidly leftist (as is the tech industry as a whole), which is why it is universally censorious.

Фото профиля Jake Hoot
Jake Hoot1 год назад

How much USAID do they all steal is what we really need to know..

Фото профиля Nathan
Nathan1 год назад

It’s so sad that it’s come to this. You think the movement dedicated to free and open source software would be for free speech.

Фото профиля Felipe Bueno
Felipe Bueno1 год назад

Maybe it's time for a MAGA distro

Фото профиля Scottito ☀️
Scottito ☀️1 год назад

Sucks, I just finally started to like gnome after finding the extensions I like and using mostly keyboard shortcuts. With even the kernel being tainted by wokeness its quite disappointing.

Фото профиля ROP
ROP1 год назад

I cannot stress how important this is. We need to get the word out. Current maintainers need to learn that the world does not spin around their ideals o ideas. Open source needs to be open thinking and open expression as well.

Фото профиля Rudi Servo
Rudi Servo1 год назад

Can you get Elon to fund OpenMandriva?

Похожие видео

Is Linux a “Pedo Bar”? Put another way: Does the world of Linux and Open Source (including foundations, corporations, and projects) have a disproportionately high level of rapists, pedophiles, and general degenerates? Does Open Source protect such people? And is that by design? Many of the Extreme Leftist Activists within Open Source have regularly attacked anyone who objects to degeneracy — often banning them from organizations entirely, labeling those opposed to degeneracy as “Nazis”. These Leftist Activists say they are trying to stop Open Source from becoming a “Nazi Bar” (a place where Nazis feel safe to congregate) by banning “Nazis”. But, clearly, there are no actual Nazis there (at least not in any significant number). There is no “Nazi Bar” in Open Source. But there is another group that feels extremely safe within Open Source: Rapists, Pedophiles, and general Degenerates. A short anecdote: Many years back (a decade or more), while recording a Linux podcast, I mocked rapists. I made a quick, off-handed remark about how much I despise rapists. About how I felt that anyone who would rape another human being must be truly awful and insane. I did not consider this to be a controversial statement to make. Every good person is opposed to rapists, right? Well… The response, from the Extreme Leftist corners of Open Source, to me being *opposed* to rape, was truly bizarre. For *several* years, those groups regularly protested my involvement in conferences and organizations. Their repeatedly stated reason for protesting me, aggressively, for years? That my position on rapists made them “feel unsafe”. Think that through for a moment. I am opposed to rapists. This made them “feel unsafe”. Why would anyone feel “unsafe” because of someone being *against* rape? Insane, right? The true reason they proclaimed they felt “unsafe” is becoming quite clear. Over the last several years we’ve watched as projects, organizations, and companies have actively promoted sexual degeneracy. Often in criminal form. Microsoft advocating for their employees to give their children (as young as 3) sex changes. Linux Distros using Trans cartoons targeting children: Open Source projects banning anyone who objects to waving the Trans Flag. So many examples. We could list similar stories all day long. Promote degenerate activity, ban anyone who objects. That is the standard operating procedure of so many Open Source organizations. We’ve all been watching it for years. Then, this week we learned about a convicted rapist (who, according to court records, committed “thousands of [sexual] assaults” of little kids) working at Canonical (the parent company of Ubuntu Linux). And being actively involved in GNOME and Ubuntu development. These crimes, according to several sources, were well known. But kept hush-hush. This registered sex offender was not only welcome, but protected (and promoted) within Open Source. The picture is becoming clear. This is what we are seeing within Open Source organizations: - Promote degenerate (often criminal) activities. - Ban and attack any who oppose the degeneracy. - Protect and elevate the degenerates (including convicted rapists of small children). Now, let me ask the question again. Is Linux (and Open Source) a “Pedo Bar”?

The Lunduke Journal

21,821 просмотров • 1 год назад