正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Open source software is GREAT. But "open source" AI is NOT like software - it's VERY different. Rob Miles cuts through the bullshit: ROB: Oh, hey, Meta. I heard Llama's weights leaked. That's rough, man. Information security's hard. How you holding up? META: Oh, we're great. Yeah, we're fine....

107,362 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ 的头像
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️2 年前

Source: Rob Miles' new banger video summarizing the last year and explaining the current situation with AI safety

Rob Miles (in SF) 的头像
Rob Miles (in SF)2 年前

I'm starting to suspect the main reason for open sourcing llama is that "Best 'Open Source' LLM" is much better marketing than "6th Best LLM"

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ 的头像
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️2 年前

It's good marketing. And many people unthinkingly cheer for anything branded 'open source' Zuck has done this many times - he convinces developers to build on his "open" platform (FB), then crushes them when economic logic dictates. (VCs stopped funding startups built on FB.)

PauseAI ⏸ 的头像
PauseAI ⏸2 年前

@robertskmiles Amazing segment. Entire video is a must-watch!

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ 的头像
AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️2 年前

@robertskmiles HE IS RISEN

Bryan Wade 的头像
Bryan Wade2 年前

@robertskmiles Ok, call it Open Weights. There are still lots of people that benefit from that. It means that I can run this stuff on my own hardware, and a for profit company can't cut me off from the technology overnight. Most of the AI startup scene only exists because of open weights.

Dirk Bruere 的头像
Dirk Bruere2 年前

@robertskmiles Illustrates that secrets cannot be kept by anyone.

Matt Prestifilippo 的头像
Matt Prestifilippo2 年前

@robertskmiles This is missing the major point that even though they don’t share the training data, it’s still expensive to produce the models. And the permissive license to use those for businesses without fees is useful.

Alex Alarga ⏹️ 的头像
Alex Alarga ⏹️2 年前

@robertskmiles

Random User 的头像
Random User2 年前

@robertskmiles I’d also highlight the aspect of learning how to code well from actual open-source.

相关视频

Elon exposes OpenAI -- OpenAI execs betrayed the founding mission as soon as there was revenue and profits to be had -- If it started as a for-profit, Elon would own 50% Elon Musk: “There's a mountain of evidence that shows that OpenAI was created as an open source nonprofit.” “That's the exact description in the incorporation documents. They have completely violated that.” “And they tried to change the definition of OpenAI to mean open to everyone instead of open source, even though it always meant open source.” “ I came up with the name. That’s how I know.” “ I mean, essentially, since I came up with the idea for the company, named it, provided the A, B, and C rounds of funding, recruited the critical personnel, and told them everything I know, if that had been a commercial corporation, I'd probably own half the company.” “It was totally at my discretion. I could have done that.” “But I created it as an open source nonprofit for the world.” Chamath: “ Do you think the right thing to do is to take those models and just open source them today?” Elon: “ Yeah, I think that is what it was created to do, so it should.” “Try using any of the recent so-called OpenAI open source models, they don't work.” “They open sourced a broken, non-working version of their models as a fig leaf.” “I mean, do you know anyone who's running OpenAI's open source models? Jason: “No.” Elon: “Exactly.”

The All-In Podcast

387,368 次观看 • 1 年前

.Josh Wolfe: Anybody Using DeepSeek App Is 'Absolute Fool' "Anybody using the DeepSeek app is an absolute fool. If you're using DeepSeek on companies like Together Compute, one of Lux's companies, which can get rid of the CCP censorship, then it's probably okay. But remember, the open-source movement is something we deeply believe in. Most great technologists, entrepreneurs, and venture capitalists are on the side of open source. The closed-source models that have consumed tens of billions of dollars are the ones that are really going to be at risk. When you look at Hugging Face, a major repository, or Together Compute, Runway ML, and a lot of Lux's companies, they have been pioneers in open source. Now, why am I not worried about open source, even with the DeepSeek model? As long as you don't have the CCP censorship on it, the models with their open weights allow people to run on their proprietary data. This means companies like pharma or defense companies that have their own siloed, proprietary data—think about Bloomberg with their proprietary longitudinal data, or Meta with their data—are the ones who will have the edge. Even as open source takes hold, these companies will still dominate. I’m not worried about open source being the problem. I’m more concerned about people overfunding closed models with no proprietary source. A lot of capital is going to be burned there, and we’re already seeing that with people worried about OpenAI in some aspects."

Josh Caplan

40,039 次观看 • 1 年前