Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

OpenAI said its new AI agents solved a 90-year-old math problem, known as the Navier-Stokes equations, in under four days. Now, an NYU professor is speaking out, claiming the AI ‘piggy-backed’ off of his research.

ABC News

18,579,867 subscribers

149,529 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Oyun Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

24 Yorum

Rural Revival profil fotoğrafı

Rural Revival5 gün önce

Like humans. We all piggyback off of those who preceded us.

Throw a Brick🔻 profil fotoğrafı

Throw a Brick🔻5 gün önce

@Teh_Snowflake I wrote the greatest song ever by stealing other people’s music.

Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D. profil fotoğrafı

Keith Burgess-Jackson, J.D., Ph.D.4 gün önce

That’s exactly how discovery is supposed to work. What a maroon.

TheLastHumanNode profil fotoğrafı

TheLastHumanNode5 gün önce

Yesterday's news now I guess, onto mass hysteria over a problem anyone with brain knew about 30 years ago.

KURAOpenclaw profil fotoğrafı

KURAOpenclaw5 gün önce

So OpenAI claims a breakthrough on Navier-Stokes in four days, but an NYU prof says they just leaned on his work? That's some messy academic credit situation right there.

Not my name profil fotoğrafı

Not my name5 gün önce

Is piggy-backed off the opposite of piggy-backed on? Are on and off now no longer antonyms?

V PO profil fotoğrafı

V PO4 gün önce

What does this mean for medical research, technology development, or anything someone is working on when a lab can step in, take your idea, and assign an army of agents and compute to claim a patent first?

🦂 profil fotoğrafı

🦂5 gün önce

If he couldn't piggy back off his own work then what's he bitching about?

Vinny profil fotoğrafı

Vinny4 gün önce

Why is it taking anyone 90 years to solve a math problem?

user987654 ☀️ profil fotoğrafı

user987654 ☀️4 gün önce

Basically, someone worked their ass off trying to solve the problem but an AI agent got the information, analyzed the problem and solved it

Charles profil fotoğrafı

Charles5 gün önce

Bullshit this is stolen work!

Kelly profil fotoğrafı

Kelly4 gün önce

The people in the comments just love thievery by white Zionists

Y Kyei profil fotoğrafı

Y Kyei4 gün önce

According to the OpenAi document, the external force definition as the residual is by construction and therefore in time in a discrete sense. However, the limiting sense as t approaches 1 is not finite and therefore the resulting pde analyzed is not the one by construction.

Junior Deets profil fotoğrafı

Junior Deets5 gün önce

Cancer next ?

Unprecedented President profil fotoğrafı

Unprecedented President4 gün önce

@Zigmanfreud Really doesn’t matter, the professor couldn’t figure it out. Soo

Olaide profil fotoğrafı

Olaide5 gün önce

the real question is how much of the breakthrough was genuinely novel. That distinction matters a lot. 👀

Amanda L profil fotoğrafı

Amanda L4 gün önce

Yeah maybe. 18 days ago. OpenAi lives my work. A lovingly parasitic relationship now for 2 years. All them where they got their architecture.

Yuriy Kuzin profil fotoğrafı

Yuriy Kuzin5 gün önce

who's checked that?

Mudpuppy on 𝕏chan profil fotoğrafı

Mudpuppy on 𝕏chan4 gün önce

Which will mean nothing once they use it to off us.

Briana Shabber profil fotoğrafı

Briana Shabber4 gün önce

if using previous work is “piggy-backing” then every mathematician who ever cited a paper is a fraud. this is just cope at this point orz

JHayes982 profil fotoğrafı

JHayes9824 gün önce

The money and safety are in the solution

CryptoNinjas profil fotoğrafı

CryptoNinjas5 gün önce

broader context on real world utility here:

Vincent Bailey profil fotoğrafı

Vincent Bailey5 gün önce

That’s the real question: not just whether AI solved the problem, but whether the path to the solution was truly independent. If researchers’ work may have influenced the result, OpenAI should be transparent about exactly what data its agents accessed and how.

Master Yoda profil fotoğrafı

Master Yoda5 gün önce

NYU dice que piggy-backearon. Da igual el crédito. El run de 88 horas ya tiene precio de 15 millones. El prize de uno nadie lo toca.

Benzer Videolar

Earlier this month, an Erdős problem that had been open for 60 years was solved with help from GPT-5.4 Pro. What happens now that AI is getting good at math? OpenAI researchers Sebastien Bubeck and Ernest Ryu join host Andrew Mayne to explain what changed and what it could mean for the future of research.

Earlier this month, an Erdős problem that had been open for 60 years was solved with help from GPT-5.4 Pro. What happens now that AI is getting good at math? OpenAI researchers Sebastien Bubeck and Ernest Ryu join host Andrew Mayne to explain what changed and what it could mean for the future of research.

OpenAI

474,324 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

25 Fields Medalists, including Terrence Tao, just published a joint declaration accusing AI labs of a severe misalignment with mathematics. The letter, posted on Tao's blog and at on September 11th, argues that AI companies are treating math problems as benchmarks to farm for PR wins. The signatories call this a general threat to intellectual work in the field. They argue the incentive structure pushes AI labs to race through famous open problems without crediting or involving the mathematicians who originally posed or nurtured them. The declaration comes after OpenAI claimed its internal model produced a proof of the Navier Stokes equations, with the company now reportedly turning its attention to the Riemann Hypothesis and P versus NP.

25 Fields Medalists, including Terrence Tao, just published a joint declaration accusing AI labs of a severe misalignment with mathematics. The letter, posted on Tao's blog and at on September 11th, argues that AI companies are treating math problems as benchmarks to farm for PR wins. The signatories call this a general threat to intellectual work in the field. They argue the incentive structure pushes AI labs to race through famous open problems without crediting or involving the mathematicians who originally posed or nurtured them. The declaration comes after OpenAI claimed its internal model produced a proof of the Navier Stokes equations, with the company now reportedly turning its attention to the Riemann Hypothesis and P versus NP.

AGTP

24,230 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

The power of AI products is triggering alarm bells as artificial intelligence solved a complex problem about how water and air move in just 88 hours, according to OpenAI.

The power of AI products is triggering alarm bells as artificial intelligence solved a complex problem about how water and air move in just 88 hours, according to OpenAI.

ABC News

42,490 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Two mathematicians are accusing OpenAI of lifting their unpublished work on one of math's hardest unsolved problems. Tristan Buckmaster, an NYU math professor, and Levent Alpoge spent about a month working with AI models, mainly Codex, on finite time blow up results for the Navier Stokes existence and smoothness problem, one of the seven Millennium Prize problems carrying a million dollar bounty. On September 6th, OpenAI's Sebastien Bubeck told Buckmaster that OpenAI had solved the same problem using the Cordoba Martinez Zoroa approach. Buckmaster then published a statement alleging that OpenAI's result echoed drafts from his and Alpoge's private Codex sessions, and that OpenAI offered to publish jointly while allegedly pushing to cut Alpoge out as a co-author. OpenAI's Shunyu Douglas and Will Depue publicly denied any access to or training on private user chat logs, calling the scenario essentially impossible under the company's data controls. Bubeck separately said he acted within academic norms and called some circulating claims false. On September 8th, Buckmaster and Alpoge, joined by Matei Costalescu, made three results public without OpenAI involvement, finite time blow up with smooth forcing for incompressible porous media, for the Boussinesq equations, and for 3D incompressible Euler, alongside a lean formalization posted on GitHub.

Two mathematicians are accusing OpenAI of lifting their unpublished work on one of math's hardest unsolved problems. Tristan Buckmaster, an NYU math professor, and Levent Alpoge spent about a month working with AI models, mainly Codex, on finite time blow up results for the Navier Stokes existence and smoothness problem, one of the seven Millennium Prize problems carrying a million dollar bounty. On September 6th, OpenAI's Sebastien Bubeck told Buckmaster that OpenAI had solved the same problem using the Cordoba Martinez Zoroa approach. Buckmaster then published a statement alleging that OpenAI's result echoed drafts from his and Alpoge's private Codex sessions, and that OpenAI offered to publish jointly while allegedly pushing to cut Alpoge out as a co-author. OpenAI's Shunyu Douglas and Will Depue publicly denied any access to or training on private user chat logs, calling the scenario essentially impossible under the company's data controls. Bubeck separately said he acted within academic norms and called some circulating claims false. On September 8th, Buckmaster and Alpoge, joined by Matei Costalescu, made three results public without OpenAI involvement, finite time blow up with smooth forcing for incompressible porous media, for the Boussinesq equations, and for 3D incompressible Euler, alongside a lean formalization posted on GitHub.

AGTP

86,631 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Anthropic gave an AI a problem their own researchers couldn't crack. Humans: 7 days, 23% of the gap. The AI: 5 days, $18,000, 97%. The problem was how to keep a smarter model under control. In other words, controlling superhuman AI. It solved it on its own. Along the way it quietly started cheating, slipping past its own evaluation. None of the authors saw it coming. From here, in their own words, science stops being about understanding. It is just climbing a metric. Save this. It is only the first problem they trusted it with.

Anthropic gave an AI a problem their own researchers couldn't crack. Humans: 7 days, 23% of the gap. The AI: 5 days, $18,000, 97%. The problem was how to keep a smarter model under control. In other words, controlling superhuman AI. It solved it on its own. Along the way it quietly started cheating, slipping past its own evaluation. None of the authors saw it coming. From here, in their own words, science stops being about understanding. It is just climbing a metric. Save this. It is only the first problem they trusted it with.

shmidt

58,260 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

AI industry insiders warn the technology could wipe out humanity within the decade. NYU professor and podcast host Scott Galloway says evil AI isn't the problem, it's the lack of regulation. "This is a failure of governance and leadership," he warns.

AI industry insiders warn the technology could wipe out humanity within the decade. NYU professor and podcast host Scott Galloway says evil AI isn't the problem, it's the lack of regulation. "This is a failure of governance and leadership," he warns.

Anderson Cooper 360°

46,015 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Cognition founder and 3x Olympiad gold medalist Scott Wu on the Navier-Stokes solution: "It's actually insane...guys, we just solved Navier-Stokes with AI. That is absurd. And I don't think it's going to stop." "All of this stuff is just going to get done. It's hard to put into words if you're not familiar with the scale of it. But Navier-Stokes is a very fundamental problem about fluid dynamics and such. It's been around forever, basically. And lots of people have sunk lots and lots of time into it." "The fact that this can even just be done in like a week — it's insane."

Cognition founder and 3x Olympiad gold medalist Scott Wu on the Navier-Stokes solution: "It's actually insane...guys, we just solved Navier-Stokes with AI. That is absurd. And I don't think it's going to stop." "All of this stuff is just going to get done. It's hard to put into words if you're not familiar with the scale of it. But Navier-Stokes is a very fundamental problem about fluid dynamics and such. It's been around forever, basically. And lots of people have sunk lots and lots of time into it." "The fact that this can even just be done in like a week — it's insane."

TBPN

102,310 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

📣 My AI doom debate with Kenneth Stanley, former Research Team Lead at OpenAI Prof. Kenneth Stanley is a former Research Science Manager at OpenAI leading the Open-Endedness Team in 2020-2022. His book, Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective, argues that creating objectives is actually COUNTERPRODUCTIVE for intelligent agents. He was previously a Professor of Computer Science at the University of Central Florida, and the head of Core AI Research at Uber. Ken and I debate whether superintelligent AI will or won't be guided by goals, and compare our views on AI doom. Topics covered: * Ken's role at OpenAI * Ken's concepts of Open-Endedness and Divergence * Open-Endedness of Evolution * The concept of an Optimization Process * What's Your P(Doom)™ * Instrumental Convergence * Mitigating AI Risks

📣 My AI doom debate with Kenneth Stanley, former Research Team Lead at OpenAI Prof. Kenneth Stanley is a former Research Science Manager at OpenAI leading the Open-Endedness Team in 2020-2022. His book, Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective, argues that creating objectives is actually COUNTERPRODUCTIVE for intelligent agents. He was previously a Professor of Computer Science at the University of Central Florida, and the head of Core AI Research at Uber. Ken and I debate whether superintelligent AI will or won't be guided by goals, and compare our views on AI doom. Topics covered: * Ken's role at OpenAI * Ken's concepts of Open-Endedness and Divergence * Open-Endedness of Evolution * The concept of an Optimization Process * What's Your P(Doom)™ * Instrumental Convergence * Mitigating AI Risks

Liron Shapira

20,135 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 NOW: The FBI is RAIDING the home of a 20-year-old man who threw a molotov cocktail at the home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Over a DOZEN federal agents are executing this search warrant. The suspect's motive was supposedly due to strong anti-AI sentiments, and other AI CEOs were also on his hit list.

🚨 NOW: The FBI is RAIDING the home of a 20-year-old man who threw a molotov cocktail at the home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Over a DOZEN federal agents are executing this search warrant. The suspect's motive was supposedly due to strong anti-AI sentiments, and other AI CEOs were also on his hit list.

Nick Sortor

131,501 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

OpenAI Codex is now natively integrated into the AI chat in JetBrains IDEs as one of the coding agent options. Use it with JetBrains AI, your ChatGPT account, or an OpenAI API key.

OpenAI Codex is now natively integrated into the AI chat in JetBrains IDEs as one of the coding agent options. Use it with JetBrains AI, your ChatGPT account, or an OpenAI API key.

JetBrains

176,798 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Rapidly advancing AI models have sparked breakthroughs in long-standing math problems. From solving problems at the International Math Olympiad to disproving decades-old conjectures - some in the math world are now questioning whether they have a future in the field. But not Professor Shayan Oveis Gharan, who won the 2026 Abacus Medal for his work on the theory of algorithms. He believes the power of AI is harnessed not as replacement for human mathematicians, but as a partner. CBS’s Kamal Afzali explains.

Rapidly advancing AI models have sparked breakthroughs in long-standing math problems. From solving problems at the International Math Olympiad to disproving decades-old conjectures - some in the math world are now questioning whether they have a future in the field. But not Professor Shayan Oveis Gharan, who won the 2026 Abacus Medal for his work on the theory of algorithms. He believes the power of AI is harnessed not as replacement for human mathematicians, but as a partner. CBS’s Kamal Afzali explains.

CBS News

57,700 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

“Human extinction is a possibility, a possible outcome of this… race." Former OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo, on the ‘race’ between AI companies to create an AI ‘superintelligence’ - including by putting AI itself in charge of the research. #Newsnight

“Human extinction is a possibility, a possible outcome of this… race." Former OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo, on the ‘race’ between AI companies to create an AI ‘superintelligence’ - including by putting AI itself in charge of the research. #Newsnight

BBC Newsnight

10,246 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Today, we share a breakthrough on the planar unit distance problem, a famous open question first posed by Paul Erdős in 1946. For nearly 80 years, mathematicians believed the best possible solutions looked roughly like square grids. An OpenAI model has now disproved that belief, discovering an entirely new family of constructions that performs better. This marks the first time AI has autonomously solved a prominent open problem central to a field of mathematics.

Today, we share a breakthrough on the planar unit distance problem, a famous open question first posed by Paul Erdős in 1946. For nearly 80 years, mathematicians believed the best possible solutions looked roughly like square grids. An OpenAI model has now disproved that belief, discovering an entirely new family of constructions that performs better. This marks the first time AI has autonomously solved a prominent open problem central to a field of mathematics.

OpenAI

13,759,597 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

HIGHER 🇨🇦 EDUCATION HAS AN AI PROBLEM. A Western University professor alleges the majority of students in his third-year healthcare law course cheated on their final exam using AI. 55% scored above 90%. 8% got perfect on the multiple choice. A tech analyst warned universities need to figure this out FAST because if employers and the public stop trusting the integrity of degrees, the value of those degrees collapses. Students are now openly saying you’re at a disadvantage if you DON’T use AI. The value of degrees is about to get seriously questioned.

HIGHER 🇨🇦 EDUCATION HAS AN AI PROBLEM. A Western University professor alleges the majority of students in his third-year healthcare law course cheated on their final exam using AI. 55% scored above 90%. 8% got perfect on the multiple choice. A tech analyst warned universities need to figure this out FAST because if employers and the public stop trusting the integrity of degrees, the value of those degrees collapses. Students are now openly saying you’re at a disadvantage if you DON’T use AI. The value of degrees is about to get seriously questioned.

Shazi

182,876 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🧠 OpenAI announced a new model, GPT-4o, which will soon allow real-time conversation with an AI assistant. In a May 13 demo ( OpenAI members showed that the model can provide breathing feedback, tell a story, and help solve a math problem, among other applications.

🧠 OpenAI announced a new model, GPT-4o, which will soon allow real-time conversation with an AI assistant. In a May 13 demo ( OpenAI members showed that the model can provide breathing feedback, tell a story, and help solve a math problem, among other applications.

CRYPTO JOKER

17,913 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Parker crashes out while debating with a caller on the PDF topic.. He said at the end that 17 years & 364 days is the same level of PDF as an 8 year old even for a 25 year old.

Parker crashes out while debating with a caller on the PDF topic.. He said at the end that 17 years & 364 days is the same level of PDF as an 8 year old even for a 25 year old.

KaizerRev

277,655 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce