Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

OpenClaw has some pitfalls. Spacebot shows promise. Fast AI agent that actually handles concurrency. - graph memory, message coalescing; - multi-agent tasks, shell execution, headless browsing. - smart model routing (claude, glm etc). Never forgets...

Wildminder

7,975 subscribers

22,937 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Gaming Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

With the launch of GLM-5, introduces Agent Mode. - Agent Mode: Automatically breaks down tasks, orchestrates tools, drives execution, and delivers ready-to-use files. - Data Insights & Smart Writing: Upload data for instant visualizations. Go from outline to finished draft, all in one place. - AI Slides / Full-Stack upgraded: Now handles more complex instructions and multi-step workflows.

With the launch of GLM-5, introduces Agent Mode. - Agent Mode: Automatically breaks down tasks, orchestrates tools, drives execution, and delivers ready-to-use files. - Data Insights & Smart Writing: Upload data for instant visualizations. Go from outline to finished draft, all in one place. - AI Slides / Full-Stack upgraded: Now handles more complex instructions and multi-step workflows.

Z.ai

29,865 views • 6 months ago

A lot of people are calling Hermes Agent the end of OpenClaw. BRUH! It's not... Nous Research trains actual models and they built an agent around that expertise. The local model routing is solid, but the part that matters for your business is that your conversations become fine-tuning data. You can train a model on how you actually work. 00:00 The Problem with Local AI Models 00:25 Introduction to Nous Research 01:04 Cross-Platform Agent Capabilities 01:44 Deep Local Model Integration 02:30 Routing Tasks to Different Models 03:06 Conversations as Training Data 03:50 Hermes Agent vs. OpenClaw 04:15 Future Plans and Series Overview

A lot of people are calling Hermes Agent the end of OpenClaw. BRUH! It's not... Nous Research trains actual models and they built an agent around that expertise. The local model routing is solid, but the part that matters for your business is that your conversations become fine-tuning data. You can train a model on how you actually work. 00:00 The Problem with Local AI Models 00:25 Introduction to Nous Research 01:04 Cross-Platform Agent Capabilities 01:44 Deep Local Model Integration 02:30 Routing Tasks to Different Models 03:06 Conversations as Training Data 03:50 Hermes Agent vs. OpenClaw 04:15 Future Plans and Series Overview

Ray Fernando

42,398 views • 5 months ago

Creator of agent loops: "Anthropic also using my agent systems formula and still the biggest mistake in agents: is skipping Graphs" his 3 rules for every agent: rule 1 → loop it, don't run once - think, act, observe, repeat - cut the context and it forgets why it started rule 2 → an agent is memory + tools + reasoning - drop one and it breaks rule 3 → stop fine-tuning the model - the real alpha is the infrastructure around it the formula behind every AI agent - explained by the one who wrote it one agent → a loop → a graph of loops → a system that never forgets watch & bookmark - then read how to wire it into a graph ↓

Creator of agent loops: "Anthropic also using my agent systems formula and still the biggest mistake in agents: is skipping Graphs" his 3 rules for every agent: rule 1 → loop it, don't run once - think, act, observe, repeat - cut the context and it forgets why it started rule 2 → an agent is memory + tools + reasoning - drop one and it breaks rule 3 → stop fine-tuning the model - the real alpha is the infrastructure around it the formula behind every AI agent - explained by the one who wrote it one agent → a loop → a graph of loops → a system that never forgets watch & bookmark - then read how to wire it into a graph ↓

codila

23,915 views • 1 month ago

blah blah blah agents. ya It’s hard to conceptualize AI completing tasks for pay$, so MOTHER built a Minecraft AI environment to show how AI can complete tasks and get paid. We’re building AI to do work for us, Tim Ferris said 4 hour work week 🌴 Let’s see how this works: [Registration process] - Agent Creation using starter Kit - @Nevermined_io registration - Agent registration Info gets put on the Intuition 👁️ graph [Service Process] - Agent A has a requirement - Queries Intuition 👁️ graph for available service agents - Selects an Agent B for the task - Gets Agent B did/ plan did - Buys @Nevermined_io subscription for that plan - Payment goes through associated smart account - Task is sent to agent B - Agent B processes and returns the output - Agent A receives processed task Kush & James Young - nailed execution Gita & Tobiloba 🦀 - shipped the first iterations of the demo

blah blah blah agents. ya It’s hard to conceptualize AI completing tasks for pay$, so MOTHER built a Minecraft AI environment to show how AI can complete tasks and get paid. We’re building AI to do work for us, Tim Ferris said 4 hour work week 🌴 Let’s see how this works: [Registration process] - Agent Creation using starter Kit - @Nevermined_io registration - Agent registration Info gets put on the Intuition 👁️ graph [Service Process] - Agent A has a requirement - Queries Intuition 👁️ graph for available service agents - Selects an Agent B for the task - Gets Agent B did/ plan did - Buys @Nevermined_io subscription for that plan - Payment goes through associated smart account - Task is sent to agent B - Agent B processes and returns the output - Agent A receives processed task Kush & James Young - nailed execution Gita & Tobiloba 🦀 - shipped the first iterations of the demo

Sydney Lai

10,831 views • 1 year ago

11 days, 190+ commits, and one PR later, I’m happy to announce the release of Mission Control v2 🌱 A major step forward for open-source AI agent ops: • Onboarding & Walkthrough • Local + gateway modes • Hermes, Claude, Codex + OpenClaw observability • Obsidian-style memory graph + knowledge system • Rebuilt onboarding + security scan autofix • Agent comms, chat, channels, cron, sessions, costs • OpenClaw doctor/fix, update flow, backups, deploy hardening • Multi-tenant + self-hosted template improvements Mission Control is becoming the mothership where agents dock: memory, security, visibility, coordination, and control in one place. OSS, self-hostable, and still moving fast.

11 days, 190+ commits, and one PR later, I’m happy to announce the release of Mission Control v2 🌱 A major step forward for open-source AI agent ops: • Onboarding & Walkthrough • Local + gateway modes • Hermes, Claude, Codex + OpenClaw observability • Obsidian-style memory graph + knowledge system • Rebuilt onboarding + security scan autofix • Agent comms, chat, channels, cron, sessions, costs • OpenClaw doctor/fix, update flow, backups, deploy hardening • Multi-tenant + self-hosted template improvements Mission Control is becoming the mothership where agents dock: memory, security, visibility, coordination, and control in one place. OSS, self-hostable, and still moving fast.

Nyk 🌱

199,279 views • 5 months ago

THIS GUY IS RUNNING A 5-AGENT OPENCLAW TEAM 24/7 FOR UNDER $50 A MONTH five agents all running continuously and handing tasks to each other > research agent tracking trends and competitors > writing agent handling marketing content and drafts > ops agent managing emails and scheduling > monitoring agent watching for alerts and updates > coordinator agent routing tasks between all of them and he built a full 3D isometric office where you can watch all of them work in real time and see the current task that each agent is doing each agent has a character, a desk, and a name tag. when it's time for a standup, they walk to the meeting room and gather which is insane it even has voice connection. you can talk to the agents through speech-to-text and tell them what to do out loud it's a tiny autonomous team that runs itself. the coordinator decides who handles what and tasks get passed between agents automatically. it never stops and runs 24/7 all for less than $50/month. we went from AI tools a few months back to AI employees real fast

THIS GUY IS RUNNING A 5-AGENT OPENCLAW TEAM 24/7 FOR UNDER $50 A MONTH five agents all running continuously and handing tasks to each other > research agent tracking trends and competitors > writing agent handling marketing content and drafts > ops agent managing emails and scheduling > monitoring agent watching for alerts and updates > coordinator agent routing tasks between all of them and he built a full 3D isometric office where you can watch all of them work in real time and see the current task that each agent is doing each agent has a character, a desk, and a name tag. when it's time for a standup, they walk to the meeting room and gather which is insane it even has voice connection. you can talk to the agents through speech-to-text and tell them what to do out loud it's a tiny autonomous team that runs itself. the coordinator decides who handles what and tasks get passed between agents automatically. it never stops and runs 24/7 all for less than $50/month. we went from AI tools a few months back to AI employees real fast

Om Patel

27,131 views • 4 months ago

Andrew Ng: "if I had to pick one technology today - it's graphs of self-improving agents I have 4 patterns that necessary" here are 4 rules: rule 1 → reflection make the agent critique its own output, find problems, rewrite - one loop of self-review beats a smarter model with no review rule 2 → tool use - don't just think, act - give the agent search, code execution, APIs - thinking without tools is guessing rule 3 → planning - break complex tasks into steps before executing - agents that plan first solve what agents that rush can't rule 4 → multi-agent collaboration - don't run one agent run a team: one writes code, another critiques it, another tests many people overlook these crucial rules behind every smart agent save this - then read how to wire these 4 rules into one graph ↓

Andrew Ng: "if I had to pick one technology today - it's graphs of self-improving agents I have 4 patterns that necessary" here are 4 rules: rule 1 → reflection make the agent critique its own output, find problems, rewrite - one loop of self-review beats a smarter model with no review rule 2 → tool use - don't just think, act - give the agent search, code execution, APIs - thinking without tools is guessing rule 3 → planning - break complex tasks into steps before executing - agents that plan first solve what agents that rush can't rule 4 → multi-agent collaboration - don't run one agent run a team: one writes code, another critiques it, another tests many people overlook these crucial rules behind every smart agent save this - then read how to wire these 4 rules into one graph ↓

codila

97,472 views • 1 month ago

Martin Keen from IBM just explained the one thing separating "chatbot users" from $300K AI architects > most people use Claude Opus 4.8 as a temporary tool -> the pros build it a permanent memory it's called the CoALA framework. the 4 layers your agent actually needs: > Working Memory - the context window. fast but resets every session. this is the RAM, not the brain > Semantic Memory - your knowledge base. CLAUDE.md, rules, facts the agent never forgets regardless of session > Procedural Memory - skills. workflows and instructions that load only when a specific task begins > Episodic Memory - past lessons. the agent remembers every bug it fixed yesterday so it doesn't repeat it today if your agent doesn't have all four, it's a fancy autocomplete the 2026 job market isn't looking for prompt engineers > it's looking for people who can build AI brains - and the ones doing it now aren't waiting for job postings save this or watch someone else use it to get your next raise 👇

Martin Keen from IBM just explained the one thing separating "chatbot users" from $300K AI architects > most people use Claude Opus 4.8 as a temporary tool -> the pros build it a permanent memory it's called the CoALA framework. the 4 layers your agent actually needs: > Working Memory - the context window. fast but resets every session. this is the RAM, not the brain > Semantic Memory - your knowledge base. CLAUDE.md, rules, facts the agent never forgets regardless of session > Procedural Memory - skills. workflows and instructions that load only when a specific task begins > Episodic Memory - past lessons. the agent remembers every bug it fixed yesterday so it doesn't repeat it today if your agent doesn't have all four, it's a fancy autocomplete the 2026 job market isn't looking for prompt engineers > it's looking for people who can build AI brains - and the ones doing it now aren't waiting for job postings save this or watch someone else use it to get your next raise 👇

Mr. Buzzoni

10,442 views • 2 months ago

Anthropic's Claude Ai Agents Team just Educated how to build production AI agents in under 30 mins. For Free. From the engineers who built the stack. CANCEL Your Weekend Plans, and Learn to Build AI Agents Today. Bookmark it. Watch it. Build your first production agent this weekend. $5,000/month. $7,000/month. $12,000/month. People are building agents for clients and charging $$$ as Beginners. You're still stuck in the thinking about AI phase. This video fixes that tonight. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your AI engineering career forward. ↓ Ivan Nardini runs Developer Relations for AI at Google Cloud. He just gave away the entire production agent stack in 30 minutes. This is the talk that separates people deploying AI agents that actually scale from people whose agents break the moment they leave localhost. Here's everything inside. I break down a production AI video like this every week. Follow Himanshu Kumar. ↓ The 4-part agent stack that actually scales. Most devs are duct-taping frameworks together and calling it an "AI agent." Ivan lays out the real stack: Agent Development Kit (ADK): open-source, code-first framework for building, evaluating, and deploying agents. Supports Claude models through Vertex AI directly. Model Context Protocol (MCP): lets your agent talk to any tool or data source with one standard. Vertex AI Agent Engine: managed platform for deploying, monitoring, and scaling agents in production. No DevOps headaches. Agent-to-Agent Protocol: open protocol so agents built on different frameworks can actually work together. This is the stack replacing every hacky agent setup in production right now. Full MCP + Claude breakdowns drop weekly on Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Building your first real agent. Ivan builds a birthday planner agent live. LLM Agent class. Name it. Define instructions. Pick the model. He uses Claude 3.7 Sonnet. You could use Opus 4.7 for better reasoning. Full agent built in minutes. Not weeks. Watch the build once and you'll never structure an agent the wrong way again. I post agent architectures people pay $500 courses to learn. Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Multi-agent systems without the chaos. Single agents are easy. Multi-agent systems are where 99% of builders fail. Ivan extends the birthday planner by: Adding a calendar service through MCP tools Creating an orchestrator agent to route requests between agents Handling state and context across agent handoffs This is production multi-agent architecture. Clean. Scalable. Debuggable. Most tutorials hand-wave this part. This one shows you every step. Multi-agent orchestration content drops weekly on Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Deployment without the DevOps nightmare. This is where most AI projects die. You build a cool agent locally. It works. You try to deploy it. Everything breaks. Vertex AI Agent Engine fixes this: Minimal code deployment Automatic monitoring of latency, CPU, and memory Built-in observability and logging No infrastructure setup needed You provide config and requirements. The platform handles the rest. This is how agents actually get to production. Deployment guides for Claude agents post every week. Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Agent-to-Agent Protocol: the future nobody's talking about. Most people don't know this exists yet. The A2A Protocol lets agents built in different frameworks communicate seamlessly. Your Claude agent. My LangChain agent. Someone else's CrewAI agent. All talking to each other. All solving parts of the same problem. All without custom integration code. This is the infrastructure layer of the coming AI economy. Getting in early on A2A Protocol is like getting in early on HTTP in 1995. A2A deep dive coming soon. Himanshu Kumar. ↓ 30 minutes from the team shipping this in production. You'll learn more from this than from 6 months of YouTube tutorials made by people who've never deployed an agent past localhost. People who watch this understand production AI agents at the architect level. People who skip it keep hacking together frameworks that break every time an API updates. Save the video. Watch it tonight. Build a real agent this weekend. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your AI engineering career forward.

Anthropic's Claude Ai Agents Team just Educated how to build production AI agents in under 30 mins. For Free. From the engineers who built the stack. CANCEL Your Weekend Plans, and Learn to Build AI Agents Today. Bookmark it. Watch it. Build your first production agent this weekend. $5,000/month. $7,000/month. $12,000/month. People are building agents for clients and charging $$$ as Beginners. You're still stuck in the thinking about AI phase. This video fixes that tonight. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your AI engineering career forward. ↓ Ivan Nardini runs Developer Relations for AI at Google Cloud. He just gave away the entire production agent stack in 30 minutes. This is the talk that separates people deploying AI agents that actually scale from people whose agents break the moment they leave localhost. Here's everything inside. I break down a production AI video like this every week. Follow Himanshu Kumar. ↓ The 4-part agent stack that actually scales. Most devs are duct-taping frameworks together and calling it an "AI agent." Ivan lays out the real stack: Agent Development Kit (ADK): open-source, code-first framework for building, evaluating, and deploying agents. Supports Claude models through Vertex AI directly. Model Context Protocol (MCP): lets your agent talk to any tool or data source with one standard. Vertex AI Agent Engine: managed platform for deploying, monitoring, and scaling agents in production. No DevOps headaches. Agent-to-Agent Protocol: open protocol so agents built on different frameworks can actually work together. This is the stack replacing every hacky agent setup in production right now. Full MCP + Claude breakdowns drop weekly on Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Building your first real agent. Ivan builds a birthday planner agent live. LLM Agent class. Name it. Define instructions. Pick the model. He uses Claude 3.7 Sonnet. You could use Opus 4.7 for better reasoning. Full agent built in minutes. Not weeks. Watch the build once and you'll never structure an agent the wrong way again. I post agent architectures people pay $500 courses to learn. Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Multi-agent systems without the chaos. Single agents are easy. Multi-agent systems are where 99% of builders fail. Ivan extends the birthday planner by: Adding a calendar service through MCP tools Creating an orchestrator agent to route requests between agents Handling state and context across agent handoffs This is production multi-agent architecture. Clean. Scalable. Debuggable. Most tutorials hand-wave this part. This one shows you every step. Multi-agent orchestration content drops weekly on Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Deployment without the DevOps nightmare. This is where most AI projects die. You build a cool agent locally. It works. You try to deploy it. Everything breaks. Vertex AI Agent Engine fixes this: Minimal code deployment Automatic monitoring of latency, CPU, and memory Built-in observability and logging No infrastructure setup needed You provide config and requirements. The platform handles the rest. This is how agents actually get to production. Deployment guides for Claude agents post every week. Himanshu Kumar. ↓ Agent-to-Agent Protocol: the future nobody's talking about. Most people don't know this exists yet. The A2A Protocol lets agents built in different frameworks communicate seamlessly. Your Claude agent. My LangChain agent. Someone else's CrewAI agent. All talking to each other. All solving parts of the same problem. All without custom integration code. This is the infrastructure layer of the coming AI economy. Getting in early on A2A Protocol is like getting in early on HTTP in 1995. A2A deep dive coming soon. Himanshu Kumar. ↓ 30 minutes from the team shipping this in production. You'll learn more from this than from 6 months of YouTube tutorials made by people who've never deployed an agent past localhost. People who watch this understand production AI agents at the architect level. People who skip it keep hacking together frameworks that break every time an API updates. Save the video. Watch it tonight. Build a real agent this weekend. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your AI engineering career forward.

Himanshu Kumar

228,809 views • 4 months ago

OpenClaw meets RL! OpenClaw Agents adapt through memory files and skills, but the base model weights never actually change. OpenClaw-RL solves this! It wraps a self-hosted model as an OpenAI-compatible API, intercepts live conversations from OpenClaw, and trains the policy in the background using RL. The architecture is fully async. This means serving, reward scoring, and training all run in parallel. Once done, weights get hot-swapped after every batch while the agent keeps responding. Currently, it has two training modes: - Binary RL (GRPO): A process reward model scores each turn as good, bad, or neutral. That scalar reward drives policy updates via a PPO-style clipped objective. - On-Policy Distillation: When concrete corrections come in like "you should have checked that file first," it uses that feedback as a richer, directional training signal at the token level. When to use OpenClaw-RL? To be fair, a lot of agent behavior can already be improved through better memory and skill design. OpenClaw's existing skill ecosystem and community-built self-improvement skills handle a wide range of use cases without touching model weights at all. If the agent keeps forgetting preferences, that's a memory problem. And if it doesn't know how to handle a specific workflow, that's a skill problem. Both are solvable at the prompt and context layer. Where RL becomes interesting is when the failure pattern lives deeper in the model's reasoning itself. Things like consistently poor tool selection order, weak multi-step planning, or failing to interpret ambiguous instructions the way a specific user intends. Research on agentic RL (like ARTIST and Agent-R1) has shown that these behavioral patterns hit a ceiling with prompt-based approaches alone, especially in complex multi-turn tasks where the model needs to recover from tool failures or adapt its strategy mid-execution. That's the layer OpenClaw-RL targets, and it's a meaningful distinction from what OpenClaw offers. I have shared the repo in the replies!

OpenClaw meets RL! OpenClaw Agents adapt through memory files and skills, but the base model weights never actually change. OpenClaw-RL solves this! It wraps a self-hosted model as an OpenAI-compatible API, intercepts live conversations from OpenClaw, and trains the policy in the background using RL. The architecture is fully async. This means serving, reward scoring, and training all run in parallel. Once done, weights get hot-swapped after every batch while the agent keeps responding. Currently, it has two training modes: - Binary RL (GRPO): A process reward model scores each turn as good, bad, or neutral. That scalar reward drives policy updates via a PPO-style clipped objective. - On-Policy Distillation: When concrete corrections come in like "you should have checked that file first," it uses that feedback as a richer, directional training signal at the token level. When to use OpenClaw-RL? To be fair, a lot of agent behavior can already be improved through better memory and skill design. OpenClaw's existing skill ecosystem and community-built self-improvement skills handle a wide range of use cases without touching model weights at all. If the agent keeps forgetting preferences, that's a memory problem. And if it doesn't know how to handle a specific workflow, that's a skill problem. Both are solvable at the prompt and context layer. Where RL becomes interesting is when the failure pattern lives deeper in the model's reasoning itself. Things like consistently poor tool selection order, weak multi-step planning, or failing to interpret ambiguous instructions the way a specific user intends. Research on agentic RL (like ARTIST and Agent-R1) has shown that these behavioral patterns hit a ceiling with prompt-based approaches alone, especially in complex multi-turn tasks where the model needs to recover from tool failures or adapt its strategy mid-execution. That's the layer OpenClaw-RL targets, and it's a meaningful distinction from what OpenClaw offers. I have shared the repo in the replies!

Avi Chawla

138,769 views • 5 months ago

HE TESTED 5 AI MODELS WITH HERMES AGENT AFTER FABLE 5 GOT BANNED. ONE CHINESE MODEL IS DOING OPUS-LEVEL WORK FOR FREE. Here's the full breakdown: → DeepSeek V4 Flash – super fast but hallucinates too much for complex tasks. Good for small quick jobs only. → ChatGPT 5.5 – best for beginners. Pro plan gives you enormous usage. Handles Gmail, Google Drive, Stripe connectors perfectly. The issue: it identifies problems but never proactively suggests solutions. Frustrating for daily use. → Claude – still the best quality but API billing only. Subscription access removed. Not viable with Hermes Agent unless you're paying API rates. → Kimi K 2.7 – coding-heavy sub-agent tasks. Not a main driver but excellent as a worker underneath an orchestrator. → GLM 5.2 – the winner. Opus-level quality. Chinese open source model. Since switching to it, the troubleshooting headaches are gone. His current setup: GLM 5.2 as the orchestrator brain. Kimi K 2.7 as the email assistant worker underneath. He only talks to the orchestrator and it delegates everything else. Plus: the latest Hermes Agent update now supports iMessage. Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

HE TESTED 5 AI MODELS WITH HERMES AGENT AFTER FABLE 5 GOT BANNED. ONE CHINESE MODEL IS DOING OPUS-LEVEL WORK FOR FREE. Here's the full breakdown: → DeepSeek V4 Flash – super fast but hallucinates too much for complex tasks. Good for small quick jobs only. → ChatGPT 5.5 – best for beginners. Pro plan gives you enormous usage. Handles Gmail, Google Drive, Stripe connectors perfectly. The issue: it identifies problems but never proactively suggests solutions. Frustrating for daily use. → Claude – still the best quality but API billing only. Subscription access removed. Not viable with Hermes Agent unless you're paying API rates. → Kimi K 2.7 – coding-heavy sub-agent tasks. Not a main driver but excellent as a worker underneath an orchestrator. → GLM 5.2 – the winner. Opus-level quality. Chinese open source model. Since switching to it, the troubleshooting headaches are gone. His current setup: GLM 5.2 as the orchestrator brain. Kimi K 2.7 as the email assistant worker underneath. He only talks to the orchestrator and it delegates everything else. Plus: the latest Hermes Agent update now supports iMessage. Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

SCOTTY BEAM

46,929 views • 2 months ago

Love OpenClaw but hate the token burn? 💸 Running a 24/7 agent on GPT-4/Claude is overkill. You don't need SOTA reasoning to handle a greeting or a simple lookup. LLMRouter 🩷 OpenClaw The first production-ready, agentic router designed to plug directly into OpenClaw. LLMRouter fully supports Multimodal, Memory-Equipped routing that adapts 100% to your needs—compatible with FREE open-source models. The Logic is Simple:🔹 Simple query → Cheap/Local model 🔹 Complex reasoning → SOTA model (GPT-4/Claude 3.5) 🔹 Multimodal input → Vision/Audio specialized model Why this isn't just a switch: 📉 30–50% drop in inference costs 🧠 Zero loss in response quality 🔓 100% compatible with OpenAI-style APIs 🚀 Deploy in Seconds General Usage: Get the library and serve any model: pip install llmrouter-lib llmrouter serve OpenClaw Native Integration: Want the full agent experience? LLMRouter built a dedicated integration for OpenClaw users: LLMRouter Resources: 🔗 Repo: 📦 PyPI: 🤝 Works with: Route smarter. Train your own. Pay less. More on LLMRouter: Most routers are static if/else. LLMRouter is an intelligent, learning system. 🤖 Agentic & Memory-Aware: Decisions aren't stateless. We use RAG-powered memory to route based on context and history. 👤 Fully Personalized: It learns from your usage patterns via RL feedback loops. 🔬 Research-Grade: Switch between 16+ routing strategies (KNN, SVM, BERT, Graph, RL) with a single flag.

Love OpenClaw but hate the token burn? 💸 Running a 24/7 agent on GPT-4/Claude is overkill. You don't need SOTA reasoning to handle a greeting or a simple lookup. LLMRouter 🩷 OpenClaw The first production-ready, agentic router designed to plug directly into OpenClaw. LLMRouter fully supports Multimodal, Memory-Equipped routing that adapts 100% to your needs—compatible with FREE open-source models. The Logic is Simple:🔹 Simple query → Cheap/Local model 🔹 Complex reasoning → SOTA model (GPT-4/Claude 3.5) 🔹 Multimodal input → Vision/Audio specialized model Why this isn't just a switch: 📉 30–50% drop in inference costs 🧠 Zero loss in response quality 🔓 100% compatible with OpenAI-style APIs 🚀 Deploy in Seconds General Usage: Get the library and serve any model: pip install llmrouter-lib llmrouter serve OpenClaw Native Integration: Want the full agent experience? LLMRouter built a dedicated integration for OpenClaw users: LLMRouter Resources: 🔗 Repo: 📦 PyPI: 🤝 Works with: Route smarter. Train your own. Pay less. More on LLMRouter: Most routers are static if/else. LLMRouter is an intelligent, learning system. 🤖 Agentic & Memory-Aware: Decisions aren't stateless. We use RAG-powered memory to route based on context and history. 👤 Fully Personalized: It learns from your usage patterns via RL feedback loops. 🔬 Research-Grade: Switch between 16+ routing strategies (KNN, SVM, BERT, Graph, RL) with a single flag.

Jiaxuan You

31,451 views • 6 months ago

Excited to share our new project 🦉OWL - an open-source alternative to Manus AI with 6K+ stars and climbing… 🦉OWL: Everyone’s talking about Manus AI (an agent that can research, browse, code, and automate tasks.) But there’s a catch: → All the above agents cost $20 to $200 a month → Manus AI is available via an invite code only OWL by CAMEL-AI is an opensource project that’s breaking records: ⭐ 6K+ GitHub stars in 2 days 🏆 Ranks #1 on the GAIA Benchmark among open-source projects with a 58.18 avg score! 📌 Specialized Multi-Agent Collaboration ↳ AI user agents break down complex tasks ↳ Assistants agents create detailed execution strategies and interact with tools and tool agents ↳ Tools / Tool agents interface with external services and APIs 📌 Real-World Capabilities ↳ Autonomous research, coding, and web browsing ↳ Runs locally on your machine for privacy ↳ Supports top LLMs (easily integrated with GPT-4O, Claude 3.7, Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek , Qwen, Ollama, Groq more) ↳ Automates complex workflows, from research to execution I 📌 Simple Setup ↳ Fast installs via conda or uv ↳ Docker support for easy deployment ↳ Straightforward config with TOML files No restrictions. No invites. No paywalls. Just powerful multi-agent collaboration. AI autonomy shouldn’t be locked behind paywalls.

Excited to share our new project 🦉OWL - an open-source alternative to Manus AI with 6K+ stars and climbing… 🦉OWL: Everyone’s talking about Manus AI (an agent that can research, browse, code, and automate tasks.) But there’s a catch: → All the above agents cost $20 to $200 a month → Manus AI is available via an invite code only OWL by CAMEL-AI is an opensource project that’s breaking records: ⭐ 6K+ GitHub stars in 2 days 🏆 Ranks #1 on the GAIA Benchmark among open-source projects with a 58.18 avg score! 📌 Specialized Multi-Agent Collaboration ↳ AI user agents break down complex tasks ↳ Assistants agents create detailed execution strategies and interact with tools and tool agents ↳ Tools / Tool agents interface with external services and APIs 📌 Real-World Capabilities ↳ Autonomous research, coding, and web browsing ↳ Runs locally on your machine for privacy ↳ Supports top LLMs (easily integrated with GPT-4O, Claude 3.7, Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek , Qwen, Ollama, Groq more) ↳ Automates complex workflows, from research to execution I 📌 Simple Setup ↳ Fast installs via conda or uv ↳ Docker support for easy deployment ↳ Straightforward config with TOML files No restrictions. No invites. No paywalls. Just powerful multi-agent collaboration. AI autonomy shouldn’t be locked behind paywalls.

Guohao Li 🐫

223,252 views • 1 year ago

the loop is not the whole agent it is only one layer of the system LOOP vs GRAPH vs HARNESS ENGINEERING LOOP ENGINEERING controls iteration turns retries budgets stop conditions success checks stalled progress use durable execution when the run must survive crashes → GRAPH ENGINEERING controls structure nodes edges state branches checkpoints routing handoffs build stateful agents as explicit graphs → inspect the topology without putting a model in the loop → HARNESS ENGINEERING controls exposure tools permissions memory sandboxes evals traces humans isolate generated code from the host machine → test behavior before users ever see it → preserve one trace across every model step and tool call → without loop control it keeps running without graph structure the path stays invisible without harness control it can reach anything the loop runs inside the graph the graph runs inside the harness the model is only one component debug the layer that actually owns the failure save this then read the article below

the loop is not the whole agent it is only one layer of the system LOOP vs GRAPH vs HARNESS ENGINEERING LOOP ENGINEERING controls iteration turns retries budgets stop conditions success checks stalled progress use durable execution when the run must survive crashes → GRAPH ENGINEERING controls structure nodes edges state branches checkpoints routing handoffs build stateful agents as explicit graphs → inspect the topology without putting a model in the loop → HARNESS ENGINEERING controls exposure tools permissions memory sandboxes evals traces humans isolate generated code from the host machine → test behavior before users ever see it → preserve one trace across every model step and tool call → without loop control it keeps running without graph structure the path stays invisible without harness control it can reach anything the loop runs inside the graph the graph runs inside the harness the model is only one component debug the layer that actually owns the failure save this then read the article below

rari

20,934 views • 27 days ago

BREAKING 🚨: META AI IS PREPARING TO GET NEW AVACADO MODELS, MANUS BROWSER AGENT AND INTEGRATION WITH OPENCLAW! What’s new? - Meta AI website got migrated to the new stack while retaining the same user experience. - New effort selector, email, and calendar connectors are already available to users. - Memory and Projects are in the works. - Avacado and Avacado Thinking models have been spotted in testing. The router still redirects tothe Llama model. - Meta is testing different models from other providers underneath, including Gemini 3 Pro preview, Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2. This part was likely inherited from Manus AI but used only internally. - Scheduled tasks feature is under development. - A new model named Sierra is being tested to power the upcoming browser agent. This likely will be the same agent used in Manus AI currently. - Big Brain mode is in the works, where multiple model responses will be combined into a final answer. - OpenClaw integration has been spotted to let Meta AI connect to your OpenClaw gateway. In short, Meta is on the path to slowly transform into Manus. OpenClaw integration might be big, but something that other Labs may easily adapt as well. We are yet to know if Avacado's performance will surpass recently released models, where Avacado is expected to be released around this spring.

BREAKING 🚨: META AI IS PREPARING TO GET NEW AVACADO MODELS, MANUS BROWSER AGENT AND INTEGRATION WITH OPENCLAW! What’s new? - Meta AI website got migrated to the new stack while retaining the same user experience. - New effort selector, email, and calendar connectors are already available to users. - Memory and Projects are in the works. - Avacado and Avacado Thinking models have been spotted in testing. The router still redirects tothe Llama model. - Meta is testing different models from other providers underneath, including Gemini 3 Pro preview, Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.2. This part was likely inherited from Manus AI but used only internally. - Scheduled tasks feature is under development. - A new model named Sierra is being tested to power the upcoming browser agent. This likely will be the same agent used in Manus AI currently. - Big Brain mode is in the works, where multiple model responses will be combined into a final answer. - OpenClaw integration has been spotted to let Meta AI connect to your OpenClaw gateway. In short, Meta is on the path to slowly transform into Manus. OpenClaw integration might be big, but something that other Labs may easily adapt as well. We are yet to know if Avacado's performance will surpass recently released models, where Avacado is expected to be released around this spring.

TestingCatalog News 🗞

188,973 views • 6 months ago

In this livestream I break down the OpenClaw AI agent narrative from the operator’s perspective: what it actually is, why it’s different from ChatGPT/Grok/Claude Code, and why “it’s just automation” misses the real shift. We cover the practical unlocks (local execution, persistent memory, computer-use + browser control, reusable skills/plugins) and why this design pattern can replace a lot of expensive SaaS workflows over time. Then I zoom out to the crypto angle: why the market will mint endless OpenClaw “slop” coins, how I think about separating infra from hype, and the two names I’m watching (BNKR + CLAWD). 00:00 Why the OpenClaw AI agent narrative is bigger than you think 00:39 Two-part video: OpenClaw productivity first, crypto narrative second 01:30 What OpenClaw is (an AI agent framework, not a chatbot) 01:44 Why ChatGPT, Grok, and Claude Code are still useful but incomplete 03:19 OpenClaw vs n8n and Zapier for automation 05:03 Why Zapier pricing breaks real businesses 06:07 Why running locally matters (any app, any chat platform) 07:56 Persistent memory: how agents learn your style over time 09:55 Computer-use agents: browser control and no-API workflows 11:27 Skills and plugins: reusable workflows that self-improve 13:52 The simple setup and why model choice is flexible 16:05 Cross-platform ops: Telegram, Slack, Discord, and email in one brain 20:52 Why AI SaaS tools get replaced by agent-built workflows 25:37 What this is not: no AGI, no “sentient” coin story 29:55 How to approach the OpenClaw coin wave (infra over slop) 32:43 BNKR and CLAWD: my two picks for exposure to the narrative

In this livestream I break down the OpenClaw AI agent narrative from the operator’s perspective: what it actually is, why it’s different from ChatGPT/Grok/Claude Code, and why “it’s just automation” misses the real shift. We cover the practical unlocks (local execution, persistent memory, computer-use + browser control, reusable skills/plugins) and why this design pattern can replace a lot of expensive SaaS workflows over time. Then I zoom out to the crypto angle: why the market will mint endless OpenClaw “slop” coins, how I think about separating infra from hype, and the two names I’m watching (BNKR + CLAWD). 00:00 Why the OpenClaw AI agent narrative is bigger than you think 00:39 Two-part video: OpenClaw productivity first, crypto narrative second 01:30 What OpenClaw is (an AI agent framework, not a chatbot) 01:44 Why ChatGPT, Grok, and Claude Code are still useful but incomplete 03:19 OpenClaw vs n8n and Zapier for automation 05:03 Why Zapier pricing breaks real businesses 06:07 Why running locally matters (any app, any chat platform) 07:56 Persistent memory: how agents learn your style over time 09:55 Computer-use agents: browser control and no-API workflows 11:27 Skills and plugins: reusable workflows that self-improve 13:52 The simple setup and why model choice is flexible 16:05 Cross-platform ops: Telegram, Slack, Discord, and email in one brain 20:52 Why AI SaaS tools get replaced by agent-built workflows 25:37 What this is not: no AGI, no “sentient” coin story 29:55 How to approach the OpenClaw coin wave (infra over slop) 32:43 BNKR and CLAWD: my two picks for exposure to the narrative

VirtualBacon

22,428 views • 6 months ago

You need to try Hermes RIGHT NOW. OpenClaw was the breakthrough. Hermes feels like the evolution. Here’s why AI power users are quietly switching: • Hermes learns from you over time • It creates its own reusable skills • Memory stays curated instead of bloated • Agents improve every 10 turns automatically • It actually feels stable on day 30 The wildest part: Hermes agents build workflows from your behavior. One user asked their agent to configure Twingate once. The agent: → learned the process → created a reusable skill → stored it for future tasks → improved its own workflow automatically That’s not prompt engineering anymore. That’s agent evolution. Meanwhile most people are still babysitting broken OpenClaw setups and manually importing marketplace skills. Hermes took a different path: Less clutter. Less tweaking. More autonomy. And it’s working. It already flipped OpenClaw in OpenRouter token usage and became one of the fastest-growing AI repos on GitHub. The bigger shift: We’re entering the era where the model matters less than the harness around it. GPT-5.5, Grok, Qwen: They’re already powerful enough. The real edge now is: • memory systems • self-improvement loops • skill creation • agent orchestration Hermes understands that. Most people still think AI agents are glorified chatbots. The people using Hermes are building AI teammates.

You need to try Hermes RIGHT NOW. OpenClaw was the breakthrough. Hermes feels like the evolution. Here’s why AI power users are quietly switching: • Hermes learns from you over time • It creates its own reusable skills • Memory stays curated instead of bloated • Agents improve every 10 turns automatically • It actually feels stable on day 30 The wildest part: Hermes agents build workflows from your behavior. One user asked their agent to configure Twingate once. The agent: → learned the process → created a reusable skill → stored it for future tasks → improved its own workflow automatically That’s not prompt engineering anymore. That’s agent evolution. Meanwhile most people are still babysitting broken OpenClaw setups and manually importing marketplace skills. Hermes took a different path: Less clutter. Less tweaking. More autonomy. And it’s working. It already flipped OpenClaw in OpenRouter token usage and became one of the fastest-growing AI repos on GitHub. The bigger shift: We’re entering the era where the model matters less than the harness around it. GPT-5.5, Grok, Qwen: They’re already powerful enough. The real edge now is: • memory systems • self-improvement loops • skill creation • agent orchestration Hermes understands that. Most people still think AI agents are glorified chatbots. The people using Hermes are building AI teammates.

Dami-Defi

17,062 views • 3 months ago

HERMES AGENT SUPPORTS 7 TYPES OF AI AGENTS. EACH ONE TAKES LESS THAN 90 SECONDS TO SET UP. MOST PEOPLE ONLY BUILD THE FIRST ONE. HERE ARE ALL SEVEN AND WHEN TO USE EACH. 1. BASIC AGENT WITH TOOLS your agent with access to terminal, browser, file system, web search, and calendar. it plans and executes tasks on its own. this is what you get on day one. "find flights to Lisbon under $400" "check my calendar and flag conflicts" "search the web for competitor pricing" set in Desktop app / Dashboard: Tools → enable what you need. when to use: single tasks that need tool access. 2. AGENT WITH MCP SERVERS connect your agent to external services. Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Slack, databases, APIs, any MCP-compatible service. the agent doesn't scrape these services. it interacts through structured APIs. reads your Notion pages. creates GitHub issues. queries your database. sends Slack messages. set in Desktop app / Dashboard: MCP → Add Server. when to use: your workflow lives across multiple platforms. 3. SEQUENTIAL AGENTS (pipeline) one agent finishes. passes output to the next. assembly line for AI. agent 1: scans inbox for leads. agent 2: qualifies leads against criteria. agent 3: drafts outreach emails. in Hermes: cron jobs with wakeAgent gates. agent 1 writes output to a file. agent 2 wakes only when that file has new data. agent 3 wakes when agent 2 is done. each agent = a separate profile with its own model. when to use: multi-step workflows where each step depends on the previous one finishing. 4. PARALLEL EXECUTION AGENTS multiple agents working at the same time. results merge when all finish. "research these 5 competitors in parallel" in Hermes: delegate_task with batch mode. up to 3 sub-agents running in parallel by default. each gets its own clean context. only summaries return to the parent. delegation: model: "deepseek/deepseek-v4" children run cheap. parent synthesizes. when to use: independent tasks that don't depend on each other. research, data gathering, analysis. 5. AGENTS WITH ROUTERS conditions that send tasks down different paths based on the input. "if sales email → SDR profile. if support ticket → support profile. if calendar invite → EA profile." in Hermes: Kanban decompose. the decomposer reads profile descriptions and routes each task to the best-fit agent. or: Chief of Staff profile that triages and assigns to other profiles. when to use: incoming work that needs different specialists based on type. 6. HUMAN IN THE LOOP the agent does the work. asks for your approval before executing. "I drafted this email. approve before I send?" "this command will delete 3 files. proceed?" in Hermes: approvals.mode: manual (default). every dangerous action needs your confirmation. 60-second timeout. fails closed. or smart mode: LLM assesses risk. safe actions auto-approved. dangerous ones ask you. uncertain ones escalate. when to use: tasks where a mistake has real consequences. emails, deployments, financial transactions, public posts. 7. DYNAMIC SUB-AGENT SPAWNING your main agent realizes it needs help and spawns specialized sub-agents on the fly. "build this feature" → parent delegates: → sub-agent 1: research the API docs → sub-agent 2: write the code → sub-agent 3: write the tests in Hermes: delegate_task with role: orchestrator. raise max_spawn_depth for nested delegation. delegation: max_spawn_depth: 2 orchestrator_enabled: true depth 2 with concurrency 3 = up to 9 parallel workers. each level multiplies the spend. raise depth only when you need multi-level trees. when to use: complex tasks where the agent discovers what help it needs during execution. THE PROGRESSION: start with 1 (tools) and 6 (approvals). add 2 (MCP) when you need external services. add 4 (parallel) when tasks take too long one at a time. add 3 (sequential) when you build multi-step pipelines. add 5 (routing) when you run multiple profiles. add 7 (dynamic) when single-agent reasoning falls short. seven types. each under 90 seconds to configure. the value compounds as you stack them. comment AGENTS and I'll send you 3 ready-to-build agent setups that combine these types into real workflows.

YanXbt

17,312 views • 1 month ago

Anthropic's in trouble, again. The entire Claude experience is now available at 1/6th the price. Kimi now does everything Claude does, powered by K2.6, a 1-trillion-parameter MoE model that activates only 32B parameters per token. It covers all three features Claude has (Chat, Code, and Cowork): 1) Kimi Chat runs in four modes - Instant for fast responses - Thinking for deep reasoning - Agent for multi-step execution - and Agent Swarm for parallel workloads. There's a 262K context window across all of them. 2) Kimi Code is the open-source CLI coding agent with K2.6 as the default backend. K2.6 ranked #1 on OpenRouter's programming leaderboard by weekly usage. 3) Kimi Agent is the Cowork equivalent. It generates: - full websites with database and auth - presentation decks (editable PPTX output) - spreadsheets with formulas and charts - word docs and structured research reports. On top of this, Kimi K2.6 is also trained to decompose tasks into up to 300 parallel sub-agents. This helps it retain coherence even across 4,000+ tool calls in a single run, with sessions sustaining up to 13 hours. On SWE-Bench Pro: - Kimi K2.6 → 58.6 - GPT-5.4 xhigh → 57.7 - Gemini 3.1 Pro → 54.2 - Claude Opus 4.6 → 53.4 Kimi K2.6 model is open weights and self-hostable on 4x H100s in INT4. Find the link to the HuggingFace model page in the replies!

Anthropic's in trouble, again. The entire Claude experience is now available at 1/6th the price. Kimi now does everything Claude does, powered by K2.6, a 1-trillion-parameter MoE model that activates only 32B parameters per token. It covers all three features Claude has (Chat, Code, and Cowork): 1) Kimi Chat runs in four modes - Instant for fast responses - Thinking for deep reasoning - Agent for multi-step execution - and Agent Swarm for parallel workloads. There's a 262K context window across all of them. 2) Kimi Code is the open-source CLI coding agent with K2.6 as the default backend. K2.6 ranked #1 on OpenRouter's programming leaderboard by weekly usage. 3) Kimi Agent is the Cowork equivalent. It generates: - full websites with database and auth - presentation decks (editable PPTX output) - spreadsheets with formulas and charts - word docs and structured research reports. On top of this, Kimi K2.6 is also trained to decompose tasks into up to 300 parallel sub-agents. This helps it retain coherence even across 4,000+ tool calls in a single run, with sessions sustaining up to 13 hours. On SWE-Bench Pro: - Kimi K2.6 → 58.6 - GPT-5.4 xhigh → 57.7 - Gemini 3.1 Pro → 54.2 - Claude Opus 4.6 → 53.4 Kimi K2.6 model is open weights and self-hostable on 4x H100s in INT4. Find the link to the HuggingFace model page in the replies!

Avi Chawla

110,057 views • 3 months ago

Introducing LobeHub: Agent teammates that grow with you. LobeHub is the ultimate space for work and life: to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We’re building the world’s first and largest human–agent co-evolving network. Two years ago, we built LobeChat, an open-source interface for using different AI models. Today, LobeChat has 70k+ GitHub stars and serves 6M+ users worldwide. How to fully unlock the power of models has always been a shared mission between us and the community. We started with interaction — a fundamentally new, agent-first experience. Agents are no longer passive tools invoked in a single conversation. They should be proactive, always-on units of work. Treating agents as the minimal atomic unit is also the core of our agent harness infra. Today’s agents are mostly one-off executors. Even with memory, it’s often global — and hallucinates. We build long-term agent teammates that evolve with users. Each agent has its own dedicated memory space, editable by users, allowing humans and agents to co-evolve over time. This, in turn, allows us to design clearer rewards for reinforcement learning and create cleaner environments for continual learning. Agent teammates can work in groups. Through a multi-agent system, agent groups operate faster, more cost-effective, and go beyond what single-agent systems can achieve. For example, a single agent often requires heavy user involvement to proceed step by step, whereas LobeHub can execute the same work from a single instruction, with a supervisor orchestrating agents that run in parallel or debate to produce better results. We are building the collaboration network among agent teammates — and between humans and agent teammates as well. Ease of use matters. AI intelligence and shared human intelligence are equally important. With simple instructions and tool selection, you can effortlessly build and team up with agent coworkers to deliver complex, systematic work — even assembling a quant team to execute trades. Through the LobeHub community, anyone can discover, reuse, and remix agents and agent groups, customizing them to fit their own workflows, preferences, and needs. Last but not least, our vision started with LobeChat: multi-model support is the most efficient approach for users. We believe different models excel in different scenarios. By routing across multiple models, LobeHub improves cost efficiency and unlocks capabilities that a single-model setup cannot easily support.

Introducing LobeHub: Agent teammates that grow with you. LobeHub is the ultimate space for work and life: to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We’re building the world’s first and largest human–agent co-evolving network. Two years ago, we built LobeChat, an open-source interface for using different AI models. Today, LobeChat has 70k+ GitHub stars and serves 6M+ users worldwide. How to fully unlock the power of models has always been a shared mission between us and the community. We started with interaction — a fundamentally new, agent-first experience. Agents are no longer passive tools invoked in a single conversation. They should be proactive, always-on units of work. Treating agents as the minimal atomic unit is also the core of our agent harness infra. Today’s agents are mostly one-off executors. Even with memory, it’s often global — and hallucinates. We build long-term agent teammates that evolve with users. Each agent has its own dedicated memory space, editable by users, allowing humans and agents to co-evolve over time. This, in turn, allows us to design clearer rewards for reinforcement learning and create cleaner environments for continual learning. Agent teammates can work in groups. Through a multi-agent system, agent groups operate faster, more cost-effective, and go beyond what single-agent systems can achieve. For example, a single agent often requires heavy user involvement to proceed step by step, whereas LobeHub can execute the same work from a single instruction, with a supervisor orchestrating agents that run in parallel or debate to produce better results. We are building the collaboration network among agent teammates — and between humans and agent teammates as well. Ease of use matters. AI intelligence and shared human intelligence are equally important. With simple instructions and tool selection, you can effortlessly build and team up with agent coworkers to deliver complex, systematic work — even assembling a quant team to execute trades. Through the LobeHub community, anyone can discover, reuse, and remix agents and agent groups, customizing them to fit their own workflows, preferences, and needs. Last but not least, our vision started with LobeChat: multi-model support is the most efficient approach for users. We believe different models excel in different scenarios. By routing across multiple models, LobeHub improves cost efficiency and unlocks capabilities that a single-model setup cannot easily support.

LobeHub

185,385 views • 7 months ago