Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Opinion: Radicalization and the Attempted Terror Attack Outside Gracie Mansion Yesterday’s attempted terrorist attack outside Gracie Mansion should be a serious wake-up call. From what I observed and from some of the rhetoric reportedly shouted during the incident, I believe there is a strong possibility this attack was inspired...

21,607 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Six Kurds were stabbed with knives during a demonstration in solidarity with the Kurdish people and the women of Rojava in Antwerp Belgium. This resurgence cannot be viewed in isolation. The rehabilitation and growing international tolerance of jihadist and Islamists actors in Syria, including Abu Mohammad al-Jolani and groups with deep roots in ISIS and al-Qaeda’s ideological ecosystem, have contributed to normalizing violent Islamist movements. This is a grave indication that Islamist extremism in Europe is once again translating into direct violence against political and ethnic minorities. When Kurdish demonstrators can be attacked openly in the streets, we must ask who will be next: women marching on International Women’s Day, or Jews, who for years have been targets of hatred and violence legitimized by jihadist ideology. When figures like Jolani are reframed as pragmatic political actors, it sends a dangerous signal: that jihadist violence can be laundered through geopolitics. This ideological normalization reverberates far beyond Syria, emboldening extremist networks and lone actors across Europe. At the same time, large parts of the political right have chosen to look away from the fact that ISIS is once again rebuilding its capacity, that prisons and camps have collapsed, and that the risk of renewed conflict and large-scale refugee flows is once again real and imminent. Ignoring this development is not neutrality, it is a dangerous abdication of responsibility. This time it was Kurds, next time it will be you.

Jino Victoria Doabi ‏ژینۆ ویکتوریا دو‌آبی

11,618 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

There's been an unfortunate incident in LA with a Uhaul plowing into a crowd of anti-Khameini protestors This man should never have been able to get near the crowd with a uhaul but some info about the situation seem to be - signage on the truck is anti both the shah and the current ayatollah. is this his actual position or is this camouflage to have gotten into the protest to perpetrate an attack? "no Shah, No regime, No Mullah" Mullah is a religious leader so possibly referring to the current leader and not a king like Pahlavi Timeline appears to be - anti-Khameini protestors try to rip signs off his vehicle and are bashing on the windows and eventually his passenger side window is broken - guy in uhaul then stutterstops forward into the crowd, eventually accelerating further, then stuttering again, then full stopping down the road - there is a man surfing on top of the uhaul in the 3rd video, below I have posted another video showing the man on top of the uhaul trying to take the posters off the side, so he is likely part of the anti-Khameini protestors - uhaul driver is taken into custody by police is this a case of police not having the street sufficiently blocked off and so a guy was able to get a uhaul in here? He should not have been able to drive a uhaul this close to a massive protest crowd There are a lot of people saying this is a terrorist attack, it is possible it could be one but I don't think there's enough information to accurately assert that at this time The chronology of events also shows it is possible that the driver was in fear of his life since protestors were banging on the uhaul, windows, and removing signs+ eventually breaking his window Whatever turns out to be the actual case, it is an unfortunate event and as of right now a seeming silver lining is that no deaths have been reported

Kirsche 🥥 🧁

41,247 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

This is the moment when Israeli Arab Yoseph Haddad was thrown out of the Oxford Union after people stamped on the photo of Israeli Arabs who are being held hostage. This is what he writes: ‘I’ll tell you more about what happened at Oxford when I confronted these liars and I’ll also upload clips from my speech there, but one thing I can say for sure - Oxford has been taken over by terror supporters. 90% of the participants are clearly anti-Israel propagandists who admire Nasrallah and Sinwar and believe Israel has no right to exist. During the biased discussion, extreme statements flew such as praising and glorifying the October 7th massacre and claims that it was a “heroic act of an oppressed people.” When a speaker in the audience cried for the residents of Gaza in a forced and unbelievable way, I pulled out a picture of the Muslim hostages Yousef and Hamza al-Ziyadna and asked if she was crying for them too. One of the participants in the audience took the picture and threw it on the floor and others stepped on it. I endured curses, boos, and threats during the confrontation, but there was one thing I was not willing to endure: the humiliation of our hostages. I demanded that they be removed and I refused to continue the discussion, even when the anti-Israel chairman, who actually took part in the confrontation himself, warned me and finally decided to have me removed from the venue. In front of the hostile terrorist-supporting audience, just before I left the hall, I did one last thing - over my official tuxedo, I wore a T-shirt that I had brought. It has a picture of Nasrallah with a large X over it and the caption "Your ‘heroic’ terrorist is dead, we killed him" 🇮🇱✌🏻’

Nicole Lampert

147,020 просмотров • 1 год назад

The #Yunus media is lying again by referring to the assailants of the Dhanmondi 32 house as "protesters" or "students and general masses." If they were "students and general masses”, then why did they raise the ISIS type flags as a sign of their Islamist victory and yell "Allahu Akbar" with triumph as they destroyed the historic landmark at Dhanmondi 32 in Bangladesh? The answer is very simple: those who demolished the Dhanmondi 32 residence did so because they harbored grudges against it, and the reasons for their grudges are that it represented everything contrary to what these Islamists believe. One should not fall into the false impression that their animosities toward this house were newly formed, as they were not. This house has been hated for generations by all Islamists who have resisted Bangladesh's liberation, especially Jamaat-e-Islami. To put this in perspective, Bangladesh was fighting for its independence in order to become a secular nation, which was in opposition to the Islamists' ideology. As a result, all Islamists, including Jamaat-e-Islami, opposed Bangladesh's liberation, collaborated with the Pakistani army, and committed genocide in an attempt to thwart Bangladesh's independence, but they were unsuccessful. Regretfully, a lot of people are unaware that Bangladesh has a distinct political split when it comes to secularism. The reality is that this house represents secular and democratic politics rather than radical politics based on religion; as a result, Islamists have hated it all along. The entire Islamic political groups—Islamists, jihadists, and terrorists—have legitimate grievances against this house because it symbolizes the Bengali people's long-standing struggle for their democratic rights, rebellion against the oppression of Pakistani military dictators, secular and modern politics, and Bangladesh's very independence; therefore, as a sign of their Islamist victory, they chanted "Allahu Akbar" and raised the ISIS type flags after demolishing the house.

Mohammad Ali Arafat

29,239 просмотров • 1 год назад

I finished watching the House hearing on Sudan. Ken Isaacs a Humanitarian from Samaritans purse offered a valuable and highly factual assessment of the situation in Sudan and while I didn’t agree with some of Cameron Hudson’s end conclusions I don’t doubt his integrity or intentions. However, as usual Kholood Khair used her platform to push the Taqqadum narrative on this war that is completely divorced from reality and by default shields the RSF. Firstly the claim that this is a counter revolutionary war is nonsensical. The revolution ended in 2019 when the military leadership, Taqqadum and the RSF agreed to share power and RSF militiamen were sent in the next day to remove sit-in protestors massacring them in the process. This war started simply because the RSF militia rejected Army pressure to have their force dissolved. And with UAE financial backing and political backing from Taqqadum (who are jaded after the Army ousted them from their power sharing deal in 2021) a plan was set in motion to takeover the Sudanese State. With the RSF first attempting to neutralise the Sudanese Airforce at Meroe before launching a full scale attempt to takeover the Capital Khartoum and by extension the Sudanese State on April 15th 2023. An attack that the Army failed to prepare for due to serious military failings. Taqqadum and their affiliates however want you to believe that this war was started by shadowy remnants of Bashir’s ousted regime who wanted to suppress a revolution that had already been suppressed 4 years ago, against (non Islamist) Burhan led rule. This false narrative is ridiculous and implausible, for one these revolutionaries that this war is supposedly really against have volunteered in their thousands to fight this genocidal militia. These false narratives are only able thrive because in Western spaces the only Sudanese allowed a voice are those belonging to Taqqadum and their affiliates. The truth is Sudanese do not view the Army and the RSF as being remotely similar and there are a thousand and one clips that I can share that would attest to that. And as Ken Isaacs said what they’ve consistently observed is that Sudanese are always fleeing from the RSF militia to the safety of Army or armed group controlled areas. The Sudanese people know they have an army that needs reforming but they also know that the Army is the only force capable of dismantling this genocidal UAE sponsored militia that continues to terrorism them. As long as Western officials and diplomats continue to exclusively platform those affiliated with a political grouping (who’s support is largely limited to a fringe of the diaspora) the disconnect between the West and the Sudanese society will only continue to grow.

Mohanad

43,919 просмотров • 1 год назад

This video activated 💿🐎, so let me clarify. The "simple Jewish shepherd" in the video is a terrorist. He resides in the terror outpost near Taybeh, set up by Neriya Ben Pazi, a notorious settler leader, sanctioned by the UK and EU for violence against Palestinians. Neriya's settlers walk with the sheep from their outpost to the Palestinian houses every single day. Not because they need to graze there, there is plenty of grazing land around. They come in order to apply psychological pressure on the Palestinians, to force them to leave. Sometimes they just hang out with their sheep. Sometimes they attack. A few days before I filmed this video, one of these shepherds opened the water tankers of the Palestinians, wasting the scarce water resources. The morning after I filmed this video, this exact "shepherd" returned and threw a rock at me and Adele when he saw we weren't filming. Two days after I filmed this video, the settlers from his outpost invaded the community at night, threw rocks and pepper sprayed the activists. This is all happening near the village of Taybeh, which has been under constant settler attack for several months. Houses and fields were set on fire, people have been attacked, livestock stolen. Look up "Taybeh settler attack" to see dozens of videos. Bottom line: this "shepherd" is a part of a well-coordinated campaign of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in the West Bank. Anyone who doesn't recognise that is either ignorant or manipulative. Because the settlers themselves are saying it pretty openly, they play innocent only to the outside audience.

Andrey X

127,850 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"A new UN report says Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa is ISIS “primary target” for assassination." That’s a blatant lie! UN sold out his principles for money. It is an open secret that this is a lie. Jolani’s origins are with ISIS, and his current forces are teeming with their fighters. Over the last fortnight, after the Kurds—who crushed ISIS—engaged in combat, Jolani intervened to free thousands of ISIS terrorists. Just two months ago, a militant from Jolani’s ranks assassinated two U.S. soldiers and an interpreter during an initial meeting with the U.S. Today, ISIS flags and extremist doctrines are normalized in schools and public squares, while the UN remains silent on the specific locations where the first and second ISIS leaders were eliminated. The two top ISIS "Caliphs" killed by U.S. forces in areas under the control of Jolani (HTS) and near the Turkish border are: 1-Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (October 2019): The founder of ISIS was killed during a U.S. Special Forces raid in the village of Barisha, Idlib. This location was only a few kilometers from the Turkish border. The Syrian Kurdish forces (SDF) provided the critical intelligence that led to his discovery. 2-Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi (February 2022): The second leader of ISIS was killed in a similar U.S. operation in the town of Atmeh, Idlib. Like Baghdadi, he was hiding in a territory controlled by Jolani’s forces and situated right on the border with Turkey. The Key Controversy: Both leaders were found hiding in Idlib, a region under the strict control of Abu Mohammad al-Jolani and monitored by Turkish military posts. This has led many to question how the world's most wanted terrorists could hide in such a small, controlled area without the knowledge or protection of local authorities and regional powers. Finally, it seems the person who wrote this report is the same UN employee filmed in that car having sex with his colleague. 😏

Ukraine News 🇺🇦

10,500 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Right after the October 7 terrorist attacks, anarchist and hate groups in NYC went to work protesting and targeting Jewish houses of worship. I saw it happen repeatedly. One incident that stuck with me happened at Wall Street, where a memorial and museum had been set up for the victims of October 7. Anarchists protested directly at the entrance, yelling hateful slurs and anti-Israel hate speech. Family members of the victims trying to enter the memorial were cursed out and verbally abused. I visited the memorial myself and could smell the smoke inside and feel the attack. Another incident happened at Parkside East Synagogue, where anarchists stood at the gates yelling hateful slurs at Jewish worshippers as they entered. I was told an IAB investigation was launched into the handling of the protest, but nothing ever came out of it and eventually it went silent. Right after the Parkside East incident, former Mayor Eric Adams and a City Council member decided to push legislation to stop protesters from protesting directly in front of houses of worship, right as Adams was about to leave office. That CM claims to be a protector of the Jewish community, but in reality, it appears they sold the Jewish community out. The reality is they didn't need new legislation. All they needed was one phone call to the NYPD to push the protesters back and create a safe distance around houses of worship , but those calls were never made. Right after the legislation propaganda, Adams launched his memecoin, which he claimed would help fight antisemitism. The memecoin later crashed and investors lost their money and Jewish community was screwed again. There was also an incident in Crown Heights, in front of 770 Eastern Parkway, one of the most religiously significant Jewish holy places in New York City. Anarchists descended on the synagogue, yelling hateful slurs and attacking Jews. Thankfully, Jewish students fought back and pushed them away. I was then contacted by police sources who told me that someone in city hall allegedly ordered an investigation to find the Jewish students who pushed back and hold them accountable. Some in city hall told me that wasn't true, but people in high-ranking positions within the NYPD told me I was absolutely right and that two Jewish students were wanted. I repeatedly contacted Adams' team when anarchists protested in front of Jewish houses of worship begging them to do something I was ignored brushed off or giving some excuse. On one occasion , I was even told it was a federal issue lol But in reality a phone call could of pushed these anarchist group away from Jewish houses of worship. While I'll never agree with Mayor Zohran Mamdani's anti-Israel rhetoric, I believe he needs to stop. There are sick people who feed off this kind of rhetoric and act on it, as we've seen with recent attacks against the Jewish community. He has zero power over what happens in Israel, but his words can have consequences here in New York City. That being said, I will give credit where credit is due. After Mamdani took over and gave full authority to Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch, anarchists were never able to get as close to Jewish houses of worship again. Eric Adams is now claiming he has a win, which is ridiculous to me. I am a proud Jew and a proud Israeli. My family fought in the Six-Day War, and I still have family in the Israeli military, government, and intelligence. No amount of money, access, or clout could ever make me turn against my religion or nationality. I won't lie or sell out my community for anyone. You don't get win for this Eric.

Viral News NYC

15,584 просмотров • 25 дней назад