正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Opposing DEI is 'stupidest thing ever': Failed former mainstream journalist Rachel Gilmore, a former Global News journalist who spread misinformation about the Freedom Convoy and briefly served as CTV's election fact checker, was called to testify on diversity, equity, inclusion and feminism during a Commons committee hearing. Sheila Gunn...

RebelNewsOnline's profile picture

Rebel News

643,839 subscribers

29,942 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Parliamentary report wants to ban the 'manosphere,' including young men who want to get in shape A 62-page report from Parliament's Standing Committee on the Status of Women calls for censoring "anti-feminist" online content, reprogramming boys through early education, and regulating locker room conversations — and it was co-chaired by former Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu, who crossed the floor to the Liberals. The federal Standing Committee on the Status of Women has released a 62-page report called Confronting Anti-Feminist Ideologies in Canada. On Friday's episode of The Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 Show, Ezra walked through the document and noted it has very little to do with equality and a great deal to do with silencing disagreement. The report's very first sentence declares that anti-feminist ideologies "contribute to violence against women and gender diverse people." Ezra pointed out what that means in practice. "They're not critics. They're not opponents. They're not citizens who have a different point of view," he said. "They are evil. That's the entire premise here." The committee's recommendations follow from that premise. Enhance public awareness and digital literacy among youth. Translation: tell you what to believe. Address online harms and regulate digital platforms: censorship. Develop strategies to engage men and boys in advancing gender equality through early intervention. Translation: start on the boys young. Fund Canadian media that agrees? Bribe the regime media. Expand data collection on anti-feminist ideologies — that's paying professors to create fake scholarships around it. The report identifies the "manosphere" as a primary threat. Ezra, with some bewilderment, said that this includes young men trying to get physically fit. The committee heard testimony that "looks-maxing" — working to improve one's physical appearance — originates from anti-feminist online subcultures and is spreading into playgrounds and locker rooms. "We better stop the looks-maxing," Ezra said sarcastically. "We want people to be ugly." Traits the report describes as "toxic masculinity" include working hard, carrying a load without complaining, and showing strength. "Imagine being strong, showing strength, not complaining, and calling that toxic masculinity," Ezra said. "Isn't that something all men should aim for?" Women who prefer traditional roles — homemaking, raising children — are given two sentences in the report, in which they are essentially accused of being traitors to their sex. The "tradwife" movement is described as promoting "misogyny, anti-equality, misinformation, and idealized patriarchal roles." Choosing to be a homemaker, the report suggests, is itself a form of harm. The report recommends counter-messaging in sports, intervention in locker rooms, and "pre-bunking", that is, educating children before they are exposed to what the committee considers misinformation, so they are inoculated against it in advance. This, Ezra said, amounts to a plan to reprogram children. "Imagine having the government say your opinions aren't just wrong, they need to be pushed out of you," he said. The report also recommends requiring content moderation on social media platforms and ending online anonymity. "If you're not a feminist, that's misinformation," Ezra said. "It's not a different opinion. You're just simply wrong, evil, deluded. They have to fix you." Ezra saved his sharpest words for last, taking aim at the committee's co-chair Marilyn Gladu — who was elected as a Conservative MP on a socially conservative platform and subsequently crossed the floor to the Liberals. "She was bribed by Mark Carney," he said. "And this is what she co-wrote."
26:34

Parliamentary report wants to ban the 'manosphere,' including young men who want to get in shape A 62-page report from Parliament's Standing Committee on the Status of Women calls for censoring "anti-feminist" online content, reprogramming boys through early education, and regulating locker room conversations — and it was co-chaired by former Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu, who crossed the floor to the Liberals. The federal Standing Committee on the Status of Women has released a 62-page report called Confronting Anti-Feminist Ideologies in Canada. On Friday's episode of The Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 Show, Ezra walked through the document and noted it has very little to do with equality and a great deal to do with silencing disagreement. The report's very first sentence declares that anti-feminist ideologies "contribute to violence against women and gender diverse people." Ezra pointed out what that means in practice. "They're not critics. They're not opponents. They're not citizens who have a different point of view," he said. "They are evil. That's the entire premise here." The committee's recommendations follow from that premise. Enhance public awareness and digital literacy among youth. Translation: tell you what to believe. Address online harms and regulate digital platforms: censorship. Develop strategies to engage men and boys in advancing gender equality through early intervention. Translation: start on the boys young. Fund Canadian media that agrees? Bribe the regime media. Expand data collection on anti-feminist ideologies — that's paying professors to create fake scholarships around it. The report identifies the "manosphere" as a primary threat. Ezra, with some bewilderment, said that this includes young men trying to get physically fit. The committee heard testimony that "looks-maxing" — working to improve one's physical appearance — originates from anti-feminist online subcultures and is spreading into playgrounds and locker rooms. "We better stop the looks-maxing," Ezra said sarcastically. "We want people to be ugly." Traits the report describes as "toxic masculinity" include working hard, carrying a load without complaining, and showing strength. "Imagine being strong, showing strength, not complaining, and calling that toxic masculinity," Ezra said. "Isn't that something all men should aim for?" Women who prefer traditional roles — homemaking, raising children — are given two sentences in the report, in which they are essentially accused of being traitors to their sex. The "tradwife" movement is described as promoting "misogyny, anti-equality, misinformation, and idealized patriarchal roles." Choosing to be a homemaker, the report suggests, is itself a form of harm. The report recommends counter-messaging in sports, intervention in locker rooms, and "pre-bunking", that is, educating children before they are exposed to what the committee considers misinformation, so they are inoculated against it in advance. This, Ezra said, amounts to a plan to reprogram children. "Imagine having the government say your opinions aren't just wrong, they need to be pushed out of you," he said. The report also recommends requiring content moderation on social media platforms and ending online anonymity. "If you're not a feminist, that's misinformation," Ezra said. "It's not a different opinion. You're just simply wrong, evil, deluded. They have to fix you." Ezra saved his sharpest words for last, taking aim at the committee's co-chair Marilyn Gladu — who was elected as a Conservative MP on a socially conservative platform and subsequently crossed the floor to the Liberals. "She was bribed by Mark Carney," he said. "And this is what she co-wrote."

Rebel News

27,928 次观看 • 24 天前

American logically breaks down why Zohran Mamdani swearing in on the Quran is actually a very big deal “So Zohran Mamdani took his oath, and he took his oath by placing his hand on the Quran. And for most liberals, they're not going to care. They're going to say, hey, this is not a big deal. Do not look at this. Do not be islamophobic, and why is this even important? But to the people who actually study religion, who have actually read the Quran, who have actually been paying attention, they know that everything inside that book, inside their Bible, does not represent the views of Americans. It's very anti-American, it's very anti-woman, it's very anti-everything that we stand for. And so now the thing is, is that Americans are going to have to watch and see just how radicalized Zohran Mamdani really is. He's already a self-proclaimed socialist, and we've known that with the studies throughout history, socialism has never worked. Had it worked, there would be tons of examples, there would be reasons to actually apply this, but the truth is that it has absolutely never worked, and as a matter of fact, anybody that's ever applied socialism has failed miserably. And when I say failed miserably, I mean the collapse of absolute society has happened under socialism. So we watch this happen, and now we have to watch and see what it's going to look like in the future. And to be honest with you, I don't think it's going to be good.”
1:29

American logically breaks down why Zohran Mamdani swearing in on the Quran is actually a very big deal “So Zohran Mamdani took his oath, and he took his oath by placing his hand on the Quran. And for most liberals, they're not going to care. They're going to say, hey, this is not a big deal. Do not look at this. Do not be islamophobic, and why is this even important? But to the people who actually study religion, who have actually read the Quran, who have actually been paying attention, they know that everything inside that book, inside their Bible, does not represent the views of Americans. It's very anti-American, it's very anti-woman, it's very anti-everything that we stand for. And so now the thing is, is that Americans are going to have to watch and see just how radicalized Zohran Mamdani really is. He's already a self-proclaimed socialist, and we've known that with the studies throughout history, socialism has never worked. Had it worked, there would be tons of examples, there would be reasons to actually apply this, but the truth is that it has absolutely never worked, and as a matter of fact, anybody that's ever applied socialism has failed miserably. And when I say failed miserably, I mean the collapse of absolute society has happened under socialism. So we watch this happen, and now we have to watch and see what it's going to look like in the future. And to be honest with you, I don't think it's going to be good.”

Wall Street Apes

73,243 次观看 • 7 个月前

I have quite a few clips from Allie Beth Stuckey’s response episode. If there is continued interest, I’ll keep sharing them, but I really don’t want to beat a dead horse. Still, there are a lot of interesting things that she says, if you listen closely. First, Allie attempted to respond to the allegations that her TPUSA speech was a feminist nagging session. I say attempted, because she basically said that her definitions of “feminism” and “nagging” are different from that of her detractors. Allie can’t be a feminist, because she was just a woman standing on a stage saying true things and sharing her concerns. And it couldn’t be nagging because she got a very enthusiastic response from the crowd, the same one that paid to come see her speak. Briefly, Stuckey was acting like a feminist because she was on a stage in a teaching capacity. She was nagging because she was telling men everywhere what they had to do in order to be real men. That’s it. Very simple. Stay tuned for at least one more clip. 🫡
2:02

I have quite a few clips from Allie Beth Stuckey’s response episode. If there is continued interest, I’ll keep sharing them, but I really don’t want to beat a dead horse. Still, there are a lot of interesting things that she says, if you listen closely. First, Allie attempted to respond to the allegations that her TPUSA speech was a feminist nagging session. I say attempted, because she basically said that her definitions of “feminism” and “nagging” are different from that of her detractors. Allie can’t be a feminist, because she was just a woman standing on a stage saying true things and sharing her concerns. And it couldn’t be nagging because she got a very enthusiastic response from the crowd, the same one that paid to come see her speak. Briefly, Stuckey was acting like a feminist because she was on a stage in a teaching capacity. She was nagging because she was telling men everywhere what they had to do in order to be real men. That’s it. Very simple. Stay tuned for at least one more clip. 🫡

Defiant Baptist

16,731 次观看 • 8 个月前

A woman made a reel saying how she got extra time for herself after hiring a cook. The comments were full of positivity from Indian feminist women saying she deserved that extra time. But the point these feminist hippos are missing is this - The cook is a female who woke up early, finished her household work, got ready, and then came to cook for her too. Her husband must have probably been working in harsher conditions, obviously. Many Indian women who actually put in the effort never do feminist drama. It is always the cunning hippos who want extra privileges. Why are modern women so lazy? Even in corporate, they suck. Many of them are hired because of diversity hiring. They aren't as good or as efficient as men. If they want equality, why don't they reject women reservation and diversity hiring? Also, the same women ask for paid period leaves. Will they give paid period leave to their maids? Many women say that cooking and house chores are slavery. They should marry a man who earns the same. They should pay equal bills and hire a maid to cook. Unemployed women have no right to cry about cooking or chores.
0:45

A woman made a reel saying how she got extra time for herself after hiring a cook. The comments were full of positivity from Indian feminist women saying she deserved that extra time. But the point these feminist hippos are missing is this - The cook is a female who woke up early, finished her household work, got ready, and then came to cook for her too. Her husband must have probably been working in harsher conditions, obviously. Many Indian women who actually put in the effort never do feminist drama. It is always the cunning hippos who want extra privileges. Why are modern women so lazy? Even in corporate, they suck. Many of them are hired because of diversity hiring. They aren't as good or as efficient as men. If they want equality, why don't they reject women reservation and diversity hiring? Also, the same women ask for paid period leaves. Will they give paid period leave to their maids? Many women say that cooking and house chores are slavery. They should marry a man who earns the same. They should pay equal bills and hire a maid to cook. Unemployed women have no right to cry about cooking or chores.

︎ ︎venom

121,982 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨INSANE: Jesse Watters reveals the court that freed Iryna Zarutska’s killer is COMPLETELY run by DEI. A Harris-donor magistrate with no law degree, a clerk who calls herself a “DEI consultant,” and “racial equity organizer” and a judge named “DEI Champion of the Year.” “When Brown was arrested yet again in January of this past year, a Democrat judge who I will add was a strong supporter of Kamala Harris, released this insane criminal once again without requiring him to pay any bail.” “Ms. Stokes wasn't elected. She was nominated by the clerk in Mecklenburg County. The sitting clerk is Alyssa Chin Gary. On her LinkedIn page, she calls herself a clerk and a DEI consultant And her life mission? and a racial Reparations. equity organizer.” “Ms. Stokes was nominated by Judge Carla Archie. Judge Archie isn't just any judge. In 2019, she was the DEI Champion of the Year.” “Is this starting to make sense? Did a woman die because of DEI? This is a DEI court and they have blood on their hands. And if the people in robes are on the same side as the bad guys, that's suicide.” “DEI died when Kamala lost. It's illegal and releasing felons with dozens of arrests for social justice is a crime against the country.” Strong reporting, Jesse Watters They all need to face consequences.
1:50

🚨INSANE: Jesse Watters reveals the court that freed Iryna Zarutska’s killer is COMPLETELY run by DEI. A Harris-donor magistrate with no law degree, a clerk who calls herself a “DEI consultant,” and “racial equity organizer” and a judge named “DEI Champion of the Year.” “When Brown was arrested yet again in January of this past year, a Democrat judge who I will add was a strong supporter of Kamala Harris, released this insane criminal once again without requiring him to pay any bail.” “Ms. Stokes wasn't elected. She was nominated by the clerk in Mecklenburg County. The sitting clerk is Alyssa Chin Gary. On her LinkedIn page, she calls herself a clerk and a DEI consultant And her life mission? and a racial Reparations. equity organizer.” “Ms. Stokes was nominated by Judge Carla Archie. Judge Archie isn't just any judge. In 2019, she was the DEI Champion of the Year.” “Is this starting to make sense? Did a woman die because of DEI? This is a DEI court and they have blood on their hands. And if the people in robes are on the same side as the bad guys, that's suicide.” “DEI died when Kamala lost. It's illegal and releasing felons with dozens of arrests for social justice is a crime against the country.” Strong reporting, Jesse Watters They all need to face consequences.

Benny Johnson

2,451,075 次观看 • 10 个月前

Some Democrats are solely blaming Donald Trump for corporate America moving away from DEI. The truth is that corporations have been wanting to move away from DEI for years and Trump became a convenient scapegoat. The honeymoon phase of DEI ended a long time ago, they just didn't know how to officially separate from it. Just like any relationship that you move too fast with, the emotions of the situation blind you from seeing the true character of your partner and you over-implement good faith translations of behavior to rationalize an inevitably doomed relationship. The DEI industry has existed for a long time in one form or another but in reaction to the nationwide high emotions of the moment post the death of George Floyd, corporate America decided to marry DEI initiatives in our nation's moment of grief. Prior to 2020, most corporations didn't see the value in the initiatives of DEI and the practicality of fully adopting this shift in corporate culture. It's not to say that corporations didn't want a diverse workforce, it's just that DEI in practice prioritizes diversity as a significant factor in employment instead of a convenient byproduct. However, there was always a brewing industry waiting for the moment where this ideological framework could catch corporations on the rebound. As far back as 2015, Consulting firm McKinsey & Company, published a foundational report called "Diversity Matters" which became the key business case that influenced corporate DEI throughout the 2010s. The first inclination that this sudden marriage to DEI was destined to fail was because full adaptation of DEI by creating another department and C-Suite position as a Diversity Officer means raising financial demands for something that doesn't make money. In response to my New York Post article, titled "Why the diversity-industrial complex bubble burst," I appeared on Varney & Co on August 7th, 2023. In this segment I made this statement, "I think within corporations, ultimately it's about the bottom dollar. And the reason I personally knew that this was going to be much of a fad within corporate America to some degree." "It may not disappear completely, but it's going to drastically reduce itself. The reason being is because the DEI doesn't earn any money. And how do you actually rate the performance of diversity, equity and inclusion?" What many people don't understand about DEI is that it's not just a couple of added training sessions, it's that in the largest corporations in America, it's a behemoth of a department that radically alters how they operate and what they spend their money on. Investing money on a department structure that yields no profits yet spends money like a gambler is destined to disappear, especially in an economic downturn. Who even benefits from DEI? Most would presume that black people or other minorities are the primary beneficiaries of DEI positions in corporate America: They'd be wrong. White women benefit most from DEI because women are included in the diversity equation. It's estimated that about 63%-76% of CDOs (Chief Diversity Officers) are white women; 3%-4% are black (Zappia). Ironically, DEI is a white dominated field even in the non C-suite diversity positions. The association SHRM's 2021 data showed 61% of DEI professionals were women, the vast majority white women. The push to blame Donald Trump for DEI falling out of favor ignores the multitude of reasons why corporations fell out of love. Post-George Floyd, many corporations saw this as a public relations opportunity, throwing millions of dollars at any organization with "black" in its title and letting the world know about their alleged pledges. What they didn't expect was that making their diversity initiatives public brings them more scrutiny, not less. It's generally in the best interest of a company to remain neutral, especially if they provide a product for the public. When you take a stance and announce it, you risk losing a portion of your customer base or attacks from adversaries. Al Sharpton and other activists threatened a boycott against Target for their decision to drop all DEI initiatives and their racial equity program, which they pledged to invest $2 billion in black-owned businesses by the end of 2025. Their decision came January 24th, four days after Trump signed his executive order demanding the dismantling of DEI in the federal government. However, Trump was the scapegoat in their decision making. Target has been the "target" of activists and boycotts for their stance on social issues and product choices. In May 2023, the boycott stemming from their Pride Month collection contributed to a 5.4% drop in in-store sales and a 10.9% decline in online sales in Q2 2023, with CEO Brian Cornell acknowledging “negative guest reaction” as a factor. Oh, and we can't forget the many lawsuits brought against corporations stemming from diversity practices. IBM, Starbucks, Novant Health, have all faced lawsuits involving some form of discriminatory action due to diversity initiatives. And that's the final nail in the coffin of corporate DEI; it's legally questionable in practice. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The EEOC's Commissioner has stated publicly when replying to Mark Cuban's endorsement of diversity based hiring practices. "You’re dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law. As a general rule, race/sex can’t even be a ‘motivating factor’—nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It’s important employers understand the ground rules here.” Corporate America's relationship with DEI is coming to an end because the honeymoon phase is over and rationality is coming back to the forefront. There are way too many risks and financial burdens involved with these types of divisive practices to maintain this high-maintenance relationship. Just like any trend, DEI came into prominence quickly and now it's going away just as fast. And that's not Trump's doing: Corporate America was ready for this break-up.
15:28

Some Democrats are solely blaming Donald Trump for corporate America moving away from DEI. The truth is that corporations have been wanting to move away from DEI for years and Trump became a convenient scapegoat. The honeymoon phase of DEI ended a long time ago, they just didn't know how to officially separate from it. Just like any relationship that you move too fast with, the emotions of the situation blind you from seeing the true character of your partner and you over-implement good faith translations of behavior to rationalize an inevitably doomed relationship. The DEI industry has existed for a long time in one form or another but in reaction to the nationwide high emotions of the moment post the death of George Floyd, corporate America decided to marry DEI initiatives in our nation's moment of grief. Prior to 2020, most corporations didn't see the value in the initiatives of DEI and the practicality of fully adopting this shift in corporate culture. It's not to say that corporations didn't want a diverse workforce, it's just that DEI in practice prioritizes diversity as a significant factor in employment instead of a convenient byproduct. However, there was always a brewing industry waiting for the moment where this ideological framework could catch corporations on the rebound. As far back as 2015, Consulting firm McKinsey & Company, published a foundational report called "Diversity Matters" which became the key business case that influenced corporate DEI throughout the 2010s. The first inclination that this sudden marriage to DEI was destined to fail was because full adaptation of DEI by creating another department and C-Suite position as a Diversity Officer means raising financial demands for something that doesn't make money. In response to my New York Post article, titled "Why the diversity-industrial complex bubble burst," I appeared on Varney & Co on August 7th, 2023. In this segment I made this statement, "I think within corporations, ultimately it's about the bottom dollar. And the reason I personally knew that this was going to be much of a fad within corporate America to some degree." "It may not disappear completely, but it's going to drastically reduce itself. The reason being is because the DEI doesn't earn any money. And how do you actually rate the performance of diversity, equity and inclusion?" What many people don't understand about DEI is that it's not just a couple of added training sessions, it's that in the largest corporations in America, it's a behemoth of a department that radically alters how they operate and what they spend their money on. Investing money on a department structure that yields no profits yet spends money like a gambler is destined to disappear, especially in an economic downturn. Who even benefits from DEI? Most would presume that black people or other minorities are the primary beneficiaries of DEI positions in corporate America: They'd be wrong. White women benefit most from DEI because women are included in the diversity equation. It's estimated that about 63%-76% of CDOs (Chief Diversity Officers) are white women; 3%-4% are black (Zappia). Ironically, DEI is a white dominated field even in the non C-suite diversity positions. The association SHRM's 2021 data showed 61% of DEI professionals were women, the vast majority white women. The push to blame Donald Trump for DEI falling out of favor ignores the multitude of reasons why corporations fell out of love. Post-George Floyd, many corporations saw this as a public relations opportunity, throwing millions of dollars at any organization with "black" in its title and letting the world know about their alleged pledges. What they didn't expect was that making their diversity initiatives public brings them more scrutiny, not less. It's generally in the best interest of a company to remain neutral, especially if they provide a product for the public. When you take a stance and announce it, you risk losing a portion of your customer base or attacks from adversaries. Al Sharpton and other activists threatened a boycott against Target for their decision to drop all DEI initiatives and their racial equity program, which they pledged to invest $2 billion in black-owned businesses by the end of 2025. Their decision came January 24th, four days after Trump signed his executive order demanding the dismantling of DEI in the federal government. However, Trump was the scapegoat in their decision making. Target has been the "target" of activists and boycotts for their stance on social issues and product choices. In May 2023, the boycott stemming from their Pride Month collection contributed to a 5.4% drop in in-store sales and a 10.9% decline in online sales in Q2 2023, with CEO Brian Cornell acknowledging “negative guest reaction” as a factor. Oh, and we can't forget the many lawsuits brought against corporations stemming from diversity practices. IBM, Starbucks, Novant Health, have all faced lawsuits involving some form of discriminatory action due to diversity initiatives. And that's the final nail in the coffin of corporate DEI; it's legally questionable in practice. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The EEOC's Commissioner has stated publicly when replying to Mark Cuban's endorsement of diversity based hiring practices. "You’re dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law. As a general rule, race/sex can’t even be a ‘motivating factor’—nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It’s important employers understand the ground rules here.” Corporate America's relationship with DEI is coming to an end because the honeymoon phase is over and rationality is coming back to the forefront. There are way too many risks and financial burdens involved with these types of divisive practices to maintain this high-maintenance relationship. Just like any trend, DEI came into prominence quickly and now it's going away just as fast. And that's not Trump's doing: Corporate America was ready for this break-up.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

46,539 次观看 • 1 年前

The federal government is erasing the letters “DEI,” but the War On White People marches on. Yes, “DEI” must be routed out of every aspect of society, but if all we do is ban the name while it's changed to a hundred other less obvious things while anti-Whiteism continues unabated, then what has actually been accomplished? Remember “CRT?” Guess what? It didn't go away. They just started calling it “DEI.” But the Fake Right declared victory over “CRT” and then launched their new “fight” against “DEI.” From the moment I went public against “CRT” in 2021, I warned that it was just one front in the War On White people, and that they would just keep changing the name and telling us it doesn't exist while they continue doing the exact same thing. As “CRT” became too toxic, up sprung “DEI.” As “DEI” became too toxic, up sprung “ESG.” As “ESG” became too toxic, BlackRock's Larry Fink - chief corporate warlord of anti-Whiteness - dropped the use of the term “ESG” but “didn't change BlackRock's stance.” This is why, from day one, I have been militant in using the label “anti-White.” Because, at it's root, that's what all of this is. This entire charade is, fundamentally, a War On White People. And calling it anything else subverts the stark reality that we face and undermines our ability to fight it effectively. How can we fight an enemy we can't properly identify? The fight can't simply be against the combination of the letters D, E, and I. The fight must be against the unique, ubiquitous anti-White hatred and discrimination that infests our institutions. Word games serve only to aid and abet the enemy. It's not complicated; they hate us because we're White. If you don't see that, you're blind. If you can't say that, you're a coward. Our job is to spread the truth about the War On White People so far and wide that anyone who won't acknowledge it by name is seen as the subversive they are. We must embolden our people to call out every form of anti-White action they see wherever they see it, and stop fearing repercussions for refusing to comply with our own demise.
2:05

The federal government is erasing the letters “DEI,” but the War On White People marches on. Yes, “DEI” must be routed out of every aspect of society, but if all we do is ban the name while it's changed to a hundred other less obvious things while anti-Whiteism continues unabated, then what has actually been accomplished? Remember “CRT?” Guess what? It didn't go away. They just started calling it “DEI.” But the Fake Right declared victory over “CRT” and then launched their new “fight” against “DEI.” From the moment I went public against “CRT” in 2021, I warned that it was just one front in the War On White people, and that they would just keep changing the name and telling us it doesn't exist while they continue doing the exact same thing. As “CRT” became too toxic, up sprung “DEI.” As “DEI” became too toxic, up sprung “ESG.” As “ESG” became too toxic, BlackRock's Larry Fink - chief corporate warlord of anti-Whiteness - dropped the use of the term “ESG” but “didn't change BlackRock's stance.” This is why, from day one, I have been militant in using the label “anti-White.” Because, at it's root, that's what all of this is. This entire charade is, fundamentally, a War On White People. And calling it anything else subverts the stark reality that we face and undermines our ability to fight it effectively. How can we fight an enemy we can't properly identify? The fight can't simply be against the combination of the letters D, E, and I. The fight must be against the unique, ubiquitous anti-White hatred and discrimination that infests our institutions. Word games serve only to aid and abet the enemy. It's not complicated; they hate us because we're White. If you don't see that, you're blind. If you can't say that, you're a coward. Our job is to spread the truth about the War On White People so far and wide that anyone who won't acknowledge it by name is seen as the subversive they are. We must embolden our people to call out every form of anti-White action they see wherever they see it, and stop fearing repercussions for refusing to comply with our own demise.

Daniel Concannon

13,352 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨BREAKING: Rupert Lowe talks to Joe Rogan about the "Rape Gang Inquiry" report. "The genesis of the rape gangs was this multicultural invasion of Europe. They wanted open borders." "We've estimated a minimum of a quarter million rapes have taken place. It's probably much, much more." "A lot of these girls were impregnated and forced to convert to Islam." "These are properly organized gangs who are grooming and abusing young girls, as young as ten, and then literally trafficking them around the country." "There's a cultural difference of opinion between an open high-trust Christian view of women and the Islamic view of women." "They're predominantly from Pakistan and from one part called Mirpur. There are some from Bangladesh, Somalia, and Eritrea. There are other Muslim countries that perpetrate some of this and of course there are white people who perpetrate rape as well, but nothing on the scale of this." "The state knows this is happening, but they don't want to admit that their multicultural experiment has failed. They don't want to be called racist. People are frightened to be accused of effectively being biased and white due to all of the woke DEI rubbish that has permeated the whole of British society." Joe Rogan Rupert Lowe MP Full interview below ↓
17:40

🚨BREAKING: Rupert Lowe talks to Joe Rogan about the "Rape Gang Inquiry" report. "The genesis of the rape gangs was this multicultural invasion of Europe. They wanted open borders." "We've estimated a minimum of a quarter million rapes have taken place. It's probably much, much more." "A lot of these girls were impregnated and forced to convert to Islam." "These are properly organized gangs who are grooming and abusing young girls, as young as ten, and then literally trafficking them around the country." "There's a cultural difference of opinion between an open high-trust Christian view of women and the Islamic view of women." "They're predominantly from Pakistan and from one part called Mirpur. There are some from Bangladesh, Somalia, and Eritrea. There are other Muslim countries that perpetrate some of this and of course there are white people who perpetrate rape as well, but nothing on the scale of this." "The state knows this is happening, but they don't want to admit that their multicultural experiment has failed. They don't want to be called racist. People are frightened to be accused of effectively being biased and white due to all of the woke DEI rubbish that has permeated the whole of British society." Joe Rogan Rupert Lowe MP Full interview below ↓

KanekoaTheGreat

845,458 次观看 • 23 天前

On rape as a weapon of war. 👇🏾Remember the women of October 7. Remember the women of Congo. Remember the women of Sudan. The women of Ethiopia. All the victims around the world. There is a war against women. It’s called rape. Women are always the first victims of conflict. They are not only raped and kidnapped, but also sold and exploited as slaves. Their pain is never ending. It’s not only a woman that is destroyed when it happens, but the whole community, a whole family. The women of Congo, the women of Sudan, the women of Ethiopia, they all need us. I am today also especially willing to have us remember the women who were violated on October 7th, who were kidnapped and who were raped. This was also rape as a weapon of war. We need to condemn it, and some of them are still held as hostages. I would like to finish by honoring a woman from my city called Nathalie. Nathalie loves to go running in the morning. When she went out in 2016 to run in Vilvoorde, where I live, someone beat her up, raped her, and left her as if she was dead. After that, she went through so much pain, but the perpetrator was free three years later. The pain was so intense that Nathalie requested euthanasia, and she was granted the right to have euthanasia because the pain was unbearable. This is what our system does to women who are victims. We need to wake up for all of them. Assita Kanko
1:58

On rape as a weapon of war. 👇🏾Remember the women of October 7. Remember the women of Congo. Remember the women of Sudan. The women of Ethiopia. All the victims around the world. There is a war against women. It’s called rape. Women are always the first victims of conflict. They are not only raped and kidnapped, but also sold and exploited as slaves. Their pain is never ending. It’s not only a woman that is destroyed when it happens, but the whole community, a whole family. The women of Congo, the women of Sudan, the women of Ethiopia, they all need us. I am today also especially willing to have us remember the women who were violated on October 7th, who were kidnapped and who were raped. This was also rape as a weapon of war. We need to condemn it, and some of them are still held as hostages. I would like to finish by honoring a woman from my city called Nathalie. Nathalie loves to go running in the morning. When she went out in 2016 to run in Vilvoorde, where I live, someone beat her up, raped her, and left her as if she was dead. After that, she went through so much pain, but the perpetrator was free three years later. The pain was so intense that Nathalie requested euthanasia, and she was granted the right to have euthanasia because the pain was unbearable. This is what our system does to women who are victims. We need to wake up for all of them. Assita Kanko

Assita Kanko MEP

54,183 次观看 • 1 年前

For decades, universities, corporations, and nonprofit organizations have argued that they need diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs to create positive work and educational environments. The idea has been that training employees, students, and faculty to see and denounce structural racism and white supremacy everywhere will improve relationships. And yet, nothing that employers and universities have done in the last several decades has proven more toxic, divisive, and dispiriting than DEI. Dozens, if not hundreds of individuals have gone public to describe the cult-like mistreatment of people who refused to accept the DEI dogma that white supremacy is all-pervasive, that non-whites are inherently victims of oppression, and only whites and Asians, not blacks and Latinos, can be racist. Not everybody dislikes DEI programs. Their rapid spread across America’s colleges and universities, major corporations, and nonprofit organizations is a testament to the genuine demand for such programs among boards of directors, trustees, and executive staff. The thousands of DEI executives, consultants, and authors are a testament to the desire for DEI. Today, DEI is a $10 billion annual global industry. But telling millions of people that they are inherently racist by the color of their skin has provoked an understandable backlash. After all, it’s a racist claim made in the name of fighting racism. The central idea of DEI is that all whites and, depending on the DEI variant, all Asians are racist, for reasons outside of their control. It is a dehumanizing ideology. It is also conspiratorial, paranoid, and insulting. Consider the case of former Pennsylvania State University assistant professor of writing, Zack De Piero. In June 2020, the DEI director of the university sent a memo ordering “white people” to “Stop talking and listen to what needs to be done,” accept that they had “internalized white supremacy,” and “hold other white people accountable…” Then, the university’s DEI Vice President held a Zoom and “told everybody in attendance, ‘I want you to hold your breath in honor of George Floyd. And for all the white attendees, I want you to hold your breath even longer until you feel the pain.’” A few months later, De Piero’s employer made him watch a video called “White Teachers Are a Problem.” One year later, he says, The Penn State Affirmative Action Office told him, point blank, “There is a problem with the white race” and ordered him to attend “antiracist” workshops “until you get it.” De Piero refused to accept that he was racist, simply for the fact of being white. He refused to accept that he should lower the standards he used with his minority students simply because they were minorities. In various ways he pushed back, until he got in trouble with his supervisor. “It’s not that complicated,” he said. “You shouldn’t have to go to work and be told that you’re morally deficient because of your race.” De Piero eventually got into trouble with his advisor for asking too many hard questions about the “antiracism” trainings. De Piero looked into hiring an attorney to sue the college but couldn’t afford it. “I was just about to drop it,” he said, “and in the 12th hour I got news from the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR) that they had some funds to help me file a complaint. None of this would have been possible without them.” In our podcast interview, after I asked De Piero why he thought he stood up to DEI bullies where millions of other people had done nothing...
25:15

For decades, universities, corporations, and nonprofit organizations have argued that they need diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs to create positive work and educational environments. The idea has been that training employees, students, and faculty to see and denounce structural racism and white supremacy everywhere will improve relationships. And yet, nothing that employers and universities have done in the last several decades has proven more toxic, divisive, and dispiriting than DEI. Dozens, if not hundreds of individuals have gone public to describe the cult-like mistreatment of people who refused to accept the DEI dogma that white supremacy is all-pervasive, that non-whites are inherently victims of oppression, and only whites and Asians, not blacks and Latinos, can be racist. Not everybody dislikes DEI programs. Their rapid spread across America’s colleges and universities, major corporations, and nonprofit organizations is a testament to the genuine demand for such programs among boards of directors, trustees, and executive staff. The thousands of DEI executives, consultants, and authors are a testament to the desire for DEI. Today, DEI is a $10 billion annual global industry. But telling millions of people that they are inherently racist by the color of their skin has provoked an understandable backlash. After all, it’s a racist claim made in the name of fighting racism. The central idea of DEI is that all whites and, depending on the DEI variant, all Asians are racist, for reasons outside of their control. It is a dehumanizing ideology. It is also conspiratorial, paranoid, and insulting. Consider the case of former Pennsylvania State University assistant professor of writing, Zack De Piero. In June 2020, the DEI director of the university sent a memo ordering “white people” to “Stop talking and listen to what needs to be done,” accept that they had “internalized white supremacy,” and “hold other white people accountable…” Then, the university’s DEI Vice President held a Zoom and “told everybody in attendance, ‘I want you to hold your breath in honor of George Floyd. And for all the white attendees, I want you to hold your breath even longer until you feel the pain.’” A few months later, De Piero’s employer made him watch a video called “White Teachers Are a Problem.” One year later, he says, The Penn State Affirmative Action Office told him, point blank, “There is a problem with the white race” and ordered him to attend “antiracist” workshops “until you get it.” De Piero refused to accept that he was racist, simply for the fact of being white. He refused to accept that he should lower the standards he used with his minority students simply because they were minorities. In various ways he pushed back, until he got in trouble with his supervisor. “It’s not that complicated,” he said. “You shouldn’t have to go to work and be told that you’re morally deficient because of your race.” De Piero eventually got into trouble with his advisor for asking too many hard questions about the “antiracism” trainings. De Piero looked into hiring an attorney to sue the college but couldn’t afford it. “I was just about to drop it,” he said, “and in the 12th hour I got news from the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR) that they had some funds to help me file a complaint. None of this would have been possible without them.” In our podcast interview, after I asked De Piero why he thought he stood up to DEI bullies where millions of other people had done nothing...

Michael Shellenberger

420,793 次观看 • 2 年前

I've been sitting on the evidence for this Girlguiding story since March. Even then, it took months to persuade a mainstream publication to cover this aspect of the investigation. For an independent journalist, pursuing a story like this without the backing of a national newspaper's legal team carries obvious risks. But I persisted because I believe there is a strong public interest in asking whether organisations entrusted with the care of girls are putting safeguarding first. This investigation involved months of conversations, verification and painstaking work. Unsurprisingly, some people have suggested that concerns about these issues are exaggerated. That is why I'm sharing some of the publicly available material I found online. To be absolutely clear, there is no suggestion that this individual has done anything wrong. Indeed one could argue he has also been failed by a system that affirmed and accepted him as a Girlguiding leader and later appointed him to a 16-person advisory committee - apparently without sufficient scrutiny of his suitability for the role. The greater failure, however, was towards the girls and women who should never have been expected to accept males in a single-sex organisation. I hope this story helps explain why many women believe this debate has never simply been about being "kind". It is about safeguarding, boundaries and whose interests are prioritised. I'm grateful to everyone who helped bring this story to light, including women who spoke to me privately and helped with research. And Graham Linehan who reminded me how important it was to tell this story. And I do think we should ask why it was so difficult to secure national coverage of a story that many people would regard as being firmly in the public interest.
0:22

I've been sitting on the evidence for this Girlguiding story since March. Even then, it took months to persuade a mainstream publication to cover this aspect of the investigation. For an independent journalist, pursuing a story like this without the backing of a national newspaper's legal team carries obvious risks. But I persisted because I believe there is a strong public interest in asking whether organisations entrusted with the care of girls are putting safeguarding first. This investigation involved months of conversations, verification and painstaking work. Unsurprisingly, some people have suggested that concerns about these issues are exaggerated. That is why I'm sharing some of the publicly available material I found online. To be absolutely clear, there is no suggestion that this individual has done anything wrong. Indeed one could argue he has also been failed by a system that affirmed and accepted him as a Girlguiding leader and later appointed him to a 16-person advisory committee - apparently without sufficient scrutiny of his suitability for the role. The greater failure, however, was towards the girls and women who should never have been expected to accept males in a single-sex organisation. I hope this story helps explain why many women believe this debate has never simply been about being "kind". It is about safeguarding, boundaries and whose interests are prioritised. I'm grateful to everyone who helped bring this story to light, including women who spoke to me privately and helped with research. And Graham Linehan who reminded me how important it was to tell this story. And I do think we should ask why it was so difficult to secure national coverage of a story that many people would regard as being firmly in the public interest.

Janet Murray

1,045,896 次观看 • 26 天前

Regina police respond to backlash over weekly call-to-prayer trial Last week, a new mosque in downtown Regina announced that it had tested its outdoor, weatherproof, four-direction call-to-prayer system and that it has a permit from the Regina Police Service to begin a trial period of weekly calls. This was unexpected news for many Regina residents, who have since expressed concerns over the potential regular disruption of peace and the lack of consultation with the community. Regina Police have since issued press releases claiming that the amplification falls within bylaw requirements and discouraging threats targeted at the mosque. On Tuesday’s Rebel Roundup livestream, Sheila Gunn Reid and Lise Merle XX weighed in on the implementation, which appears to have been handled and approved solely by the police service. “From what I understand, Regina city council was not made aware of this,” said Lise. “The City of Regina administration is now aware of it, and fielding calls from a really concerned public — specifically Regina’s Jewish community.” Lise pointed out that Saskatchewan is often used as a “testing ground” to introduce radical ideas like these. “Activists — maybe including Regina Police Service — know that they’re never going to get more pushback than they do in conservative Saskatchewan,” said Lise. “So they test things on us here. And the more people that know that in Saskatchewan, the better.”
11:44

Regina police respond to backlash over weekly call-to-prayer trial Last week, a new mosque in downtown Regina announced that it had tested its outdoor, weatherproof, four-direction call-to-prayer system and that it has a permit from the Regina Police Service to begin a trial period of weekly calls. This was unexpected news for many Regina residents, who have since expressed concerns over the potential regular disruption of peace and the lack of consultation with the community. Regina Police have since issued press releases claiming that the amplification falls within bylaw requirements and discouraging threats targeted at the mosque. On Tuesday’s Rebel Roundup livestream, Sheila Gunn Reid and Lise Merle XX weighed in on the implementation, which appears to have been handled and approved solely by the police service. “From what I understand, Regina city council was not made aware of this,” said Lise. “The City of Regina administration is now aware of it, and fielding calls from a really concerned public — specifically Regina’s Jewish community.” Lise pointed out that Saskatchewan is often used as a “testing ground” to introduce radical ideas like these. “Activists — maybe including Regina Police Service — know that they’re never going to get more pushback than they do in conservative Saskatchewan,” said Lise. “So they test things on us here. And the more people that know that in Saskatchewan, the better.”

Rebel News

40,574 次观看 • 1 个月前

Our first stop in Italy was a sit-down with a former BBC-style journalist who also served as a politician here. Then we went straight to the theater for a screening of "An Inconvenient Study", followed by a panel I had been looking forward to for a long time. It was with four Italian doctors and scientists, sitting down to talk about what they actually saw during COVID. Italy was the story. After China, Italy was where the world watched people die on television and decided this was the end. I wanted to know if that's what was really happening on the ground, from the people who were there. Those conversations are coming. All I can say is wow.
0:48

Our first stop in Italy was a sit-down with a former BBC-style journalist who also served as a politician here. Then we went straight to the theater for a screening of "An Inconvenient Study", followed by a panel I had been looking forward to for a long time. It was with four Italian doctors and scientists, sitting down to talk about what they actually saw during COVID. Italy was the story. After China, Italy was where the world watched people die on television and decided this was the end. I wanted to know if that's what was really happening on the ground, from the people who were there. Those conversations are coming. All I can say is wow.

Del Bigtree

14,577 次观看 • 2 个月前

Just been tagged in this. I have no doubt in my mind that during WW2 these people would have collaborated with Germany for the following reason…. 1. They are morally bankrupt traitors who have proven they will side with the invaders during an invasion. 2. They hate Jews The thing I find most ironic is the fact that they instantly call anyone a Nazi who disagrees with their warped view of the world. The only thing that’s stopping them from being a Nazi is the fact that it’s not the Nazi’s invading because if they were she would be holding a big red flag with a swastika on it. This is a result of watching BBC news and being brainwashed by Iranian and Russian bot accounts online. We will never have a peaceful country while these people are bringing foreign wars to our streets. The most insane thing about all of this is these are the very same people who have a meltdown if they see people flagging a British flag in our own country. They are the enemy of Britain 🇬🇧
0:31

Just been tagged in this. I have no doubt in my mind that during WW2 these people would have collaborated with Germany for the following reason…. 1. They are morally bankrupt traitors who have proven they will side with the invaders during an invasion. 2. They hate Jews The thing I find most ironic is the fact that they instantly call anyone a Nazi who disagrees with their warped view of the world. The only thing that’s stopping them from being a Nazi is the fact that it’s not the Nazi’s invading because if they were she would be holding a big red flag with a swastika on it. This is a result of watching BBC news and being brainwashed by Iranian and Russian bot accounts online. We will never have a peaceful country while these people are bringing foreign wars to our streets. The most insane thing about all of this is these are the very same people who have a meltdown if they see people flagging a British flag in our own country. They are the enemy of Britain 🇬🇧

Around Liverpool

68,720 次观看 • 1 个月前

Posting this from WKRN because Marsha Blackburn is counting on journalists not asking the RIGHT questions in following up on my story about the ethics investigation of her office last year. NO ONE is saying that she was disciplined by the Senate Ethics Committee - so she is denying a claim that no one has made. That’s because the Senate Ethics Committee has not disciplined one of their own in many, many years. Instead, when it finds wrongdoing, the Ethics Committee usually makes the senators fix the problem and promise to never do it again! Here are the right questions: If this ethics investigation was politically motivated as you claim, why not release your correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee to prove that the committee investigated and found nothing? If you refuse to release correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee, why should votes not assume that you are hiding something? @ There was an ethics complaint against you last year for voting for legislation from which you could profit. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? There was an ethics complaint against you in 2021 for using your position to help an aide get out of a traffic ticket. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? ONE MORE NOTE: No journalist should accept an interview with Marsha Blackburn under the condition that they not ask about the ethics investigation.
1:02

Posting this from WKRN because Marsha Blackburn is counting on journalists not asking the RIGHT questions in following up on my story about the ethics investigation of her office last year. NO ONE is saying that she was disciplined by the Senate Ethics Committee - so she is denying a claim that no one has made. That’s because the Senate Ethics Committee has not disciplined one of their own in many, many years. Instead, when it finds wrongdoing, the Ethics Committee usually makes the senators fix the problem and promise to never do it again! Here are the right questions: If this ethics investigation was politically motivated as you claim, why not release your correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee to prove that the committee investigated and found nothing? If you refuse to release correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee, why should votes not assume that you are hiding something? @ There was an ethics complaint against you last year for voting for legislation from which you could profit. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? There was an ethics complaint against you in 2021 for using your position to help an aide get out of a traffic ticket. Will you release any correspondence with the Senate Ethics Committee about that complaint? ONE MORE NOTE: No journalist should accept an interview with Marsha Blackburn under the condition that they not ask about the ethics investigation.

Phil Williams

74,537 次观看 • 13 天前

🔥🚨BREAKING: Michelle Obama revealed that her daughters have ‘pushed away’ from her and Barrack. Malia even changed her name to further distance from the former Presidential family. The mother-of-two explained that she believes her daughters distanced themselves because they wanted to 'distinguish themselves' from their famous parents as they became adults. 'Where do we begin?' she said when asked about the difficulties she faced while raising two young women in the public eye. 'Our daughters are 26 and 23, they are young adult women. But they definitely went through a period in their teen years… it was the "push away."' Michelle noted that she has found that this is something that often happens to celebrity kids. ‘They're still doing that, and you guys know this of children with parents who are known,' she continued. 'You're trying to distinguish yourself. It's very important for my kids to feel like they've earned what they are getting in the world.'
0:40

🔥🚨BREAKING: Michelle Obama revealed that her daughters have ‘pushed away’ from her and Barrack. Malia even changed her name to further distance from the former Presidential family. The mother-of-two explained that she believes her daughters distanced themselves because they wanted to 'distinguish themselves' from their famous parents as they became adults. 'Where do we begin?' she said when asked about the difficulties she faced while raising two young women in the public eye. 'Our daughters are 26 and 23, they are young adult women. But they definitely went through a period in their teen years… it was the "push away."' Michelle noted that she has found that this is something that often happens to celebrity kids. ‘They're still doing that, and you guys know this of children with parents who are known,' she continued. 'You're trying to distinguish yourself. It's very important for my kids to feel like they've earned what they are getting in the world.'

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

16,639,714 次观看 • 1 年前