Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Oprah Winfrey ‘Clarifies’ Controversial Meghan Interview Remarks but it sounded more like she picked most random clip & ignoring the MAJOR issue which was racism.👀 Oprah has destroyed her credibility with this interview that’s why we can’t find this interview anywhere.🤨

17,895 views • 18 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Oprah Winfrey reveals she goes by Oprah instead of her birth name Orpah because people kept mispronouncing it. Keke Palmer: I found out that your name… it was originally Orpah? Oprah Winfrey: It was Orpah, from the Bible. Ruth, first chapter, 14th verse. Keke Palmer: (gasps) Oprah Winfrey: You know, it’s that whole Ruth and Naomi story. And, you know, Ruth said, “Wherever thou goest, I will go,” and then Orpah said, “I’m going back. I’m sorry, I can’t…” (laughs) “…too long. The road’s too long.” Keke Palmer: Now, what made you go to Oprah? Oprah Winfrey: It’s not what made me, I was a kid! And nobody knew how to spell it. So it turned out, on my birth certificate, it’s O-R-P-A-H. And then people started calling me Oprah. And so, it’s just the difference between the “P” being before the “R” or after the “R”. So once they started with Oprah, that’s it. I didn’t learn until I was like, probably 20 or something that, “Oh, this isn’t really my name. My name is Orpah.” Keke Palmer: And it’s still on your birth certificate as Orpah? Oprah Winfrey: As Orpah. Keke Palmer: Wow. We have so much in common, because I’m actually Eeky. Oprah Winfrey: Eeky? I thought you were Lauren Keyana… Keke Palmer: (laughs) That’s stupid… Yes! You knew my middle name! Oprah Winfrey: Your middle name. Keke Palmer: That is… I’m so happy you knew that! Oprah Winfrey: You know how I know that? Keke Palmer: How? Oprah Winfrey: TED Talk!

Ruzy.hl

607,018 views • 21 days ago

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 views • 3 months ago