正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on... show more

J A Z I I

9,995 subscribers

52,951 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

28 条评论

Bee 的头像

Bee1 天前

Omg what? This was so damn beautiful... opus did soo good its not even comparable to astra now it's a whole new level

J A Z I I 的头像

J A Z I I23 小时前

it's just too good mate i was amazed too

Bhavy☄️ 的头像

Bhavy☄️1 天前

Its over for astra lol

J A Z I I 的头像

J A Z I I23 小时前

yeah openai is cooked

Hakm 的头像

Hakm1 天前

wowoowowowowoowowow , that’s a film bro

J A Z I I 的头像

J A Z I I1 天前

thanks for prompt kek

Hakm 的头像

Hakm1 天前

hahaha ur welcome man

vengeful181 的头像

vengeful1811 天前

Jesus, opus is not even in thr same league

Frone128 的头像

Frone12823 小时前

Probably would have costed brain dead astra $900 to create something on the same level that Opus 5.5 did. To my eye Opus is SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper for the level of quality that it produced. Astra literally sniffing glue in the corner

Deepu 的头像

Deepu1 天前

Opus 5 has that taste, that sadly gpt models still don't.

Aden 的头像

Aden23 小时前

Only 23% more for 53% longer. Opus was cheaper per minute.

J A Z I I 的头像

J A Z I I23 小时前

it is cheaper i agreee

J A Z I I 的头像

J A Z I I23 小时前

added both outputs on vercel and you can play around too opus details are just too good play here:

Tim Jayas 的头像

Tim Jayas1 天前

Hands down Opus 5.5 is the best

enric699 的头像

enric69923 小时前

astra wins

nikita 的头像

nikita23 小时前

im getting dizzy things are getting too good

Zephyr ✪ 的头像

Zephyr ✪1 天前

fable paid attention to the details but it's slow to be honest

Karl 的头像

Karl1 天前

I like both tbh.

Marcel 的头像

Marcel23 小时前

Opus is on steroids, what?😭

Ved 的头像

Ved23 小时前

i just bought codex sub now this wanna make me switch to claude aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

rzler 的头像

rzler22 小时前

AI can do this now? GG guys

Zorai 的头像

Zorai23 小时前

bro this is just insane

刘朝 Zhao Liu 的头像

刘朝 Zhao Liu1 天前

This is a useful outcome split: Opus 5.5 bought more detail with 2h10m and $75, while Astra finished in 1h25m at $61. The next experiment should report acceptance rate, retries, and human edits so “better” includes quality and iteration cost.

Haleemah 的头像

Haleemah1 天前

Opus added more details

MT 的头像

MT23 小时前

way more?? its not that uch more

Inkmitsu 的头像

Inkmitsu1 天前

same prompt, same harness, max settings — the honest comparison format

K2S 的头像

K2S1 天前

I feel opus did better if we see the quality

Hustle Lab 的头像

Hustle Lab23 小时前

the detail thing tracks — opus is the friend who proofreads the group chat, astra's the one who replies 'sure' in two seconds. both have their uses honestly

相关视频

GPT 6 Astra vs SWE 2.0 tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > astra took 80 minutes to complete this task and costed $64 > swe 2.0 took 25 minutes and costed zero dollars really surprised by swe results here and astra looks nerfed right now, no idea why which one did better here?

GPT 6 Astra vs SWE 2.0 tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > astra took 80 minutes to complete this task and costed $64 > swe 2.0 took 25 minutes and costed zero dollars really surprised by swe results here and astra looks nerfed right now, no idea why which one did better here?

J A Z I I

31,322 次观看 • 13 天前

Opus 5 vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash tested both models with same frontend prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > opus took 80 minutes to complete and costed $20 > v4.1 flash took 60 minutes and costed $0.2 which one did better here?

Opus 5 vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash tested both models with same frontend prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > opus took 80 minutes to complete and costed $20 > v4.1 flash took 60 minutes and costed $0.2 which one did better here?

J A Z I I

39,045 次观看 • 13 天前

Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M3 tested both on default settings with the same prompt > Opus one shotted everything in 7 minutes > M3 needed an extra prompt to fix the "break block" feature and took 20+ minutes both got super close, judge both and lemme know which one looks better?

Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M3 tested both on default settings with the same prompt > Opus one shotted everything in 7 minutes > M3 needed an extra prompt to fix the "break block" feature and took 20+ minutes both got super close, judge both and lemme know which one looks better?

J A Z I I

67,862 次观看 • 3 个月前

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

147,705 次观看 • 21 天前

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

Peter Yang

72,458 次观看 • 1 天前

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

107,777 次观看 • 3 个月前

I asked Astra (GPT-6) and Fable 5.1 both to build GTA VI like game researching about it, and the results are below. Same prompt. Fable took ~2 hours; Astra took ~90 minutes. Watch the full gameplay side by side below, with audio switching every 10 seconds

I asked Astra (GPT-6) and Fable 5.1 both to build GTA VI like game researching about it, and the results are below. Same prompt. Fable took ~2 hours; Astra took ~90 minutes. Watch the full gameplay side by side below, with audio switching every 10 seconds

Mehul Mohan

320,447 次观看 • 19 天前

Grok 4.7 vs SWE 2 tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available and results came out really different > grok 4.7 took 32 minutes and cost $8.14 to make this > swe 2 took 15 minutes and cost $0 to make this really surprised by how good a free model is and no idea what grok was doing here which one did better?

Grok 4.7 vs SWE 2 tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available and results came out really different > grok 4.7 took 32 minutes and cost $8.14 to make this > swe 2 took 15 minutes and cost $0 to make this really surprised by how good a free model is and no idea what grok was doing here which one did better?

J A Z I I

50,932 次观看 • 2 天前

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

48,130 次观看 • 3 个月前

Same prompt. GPT-5.6 Sol vs Opus 5. All in Three.js. Opus produced the better raw visuals. The ocean, waves and atmosphere look noticeably richer. But it also: → cost ~10x more → took much longer → needed an extra prompt just to fix the camera controls Sol got surprisingly close on the first attempt, much faster and far cheaper. Opus wins visual fidelity. Sol wins the actual engineering test.

Same prompt. GPT-5.6 Sol vs Opus 5. All in Three.js. Opus produced the better raw visuals. The ocean, waves and atmosphere look noticeably richer. But it also: → cost ~10x more → took much longer → needed an extra prompt just to fix the camera controls Sol got surprisingly close on the first attempt, much faster and far cheaper. Opus wins visual fidelity. Sol wins the actual engineering test.

Token Gremlin

12,914 次观看 • 1 个月前

I recreated Townscaper with GPT-6 Astra using Three.js on Happycapy The result is surprisingly close to the original, and it took way less time than I expected 🤯 Astra is seriously good at this kind of 3D coding task.

I recreated Townscaper with GPT-6 Astra using Three.js on Happycapy The result is surprisingly close to the original, and it took way less time than I expected 🤯 Astra is seriously good at this kind of 3D coding task.

Min Zhou

10,531 次观看 • 16 天前

anthropic cooked hard with opus 5.2 after testing it for a whole day, i can say this model is so good > huge step up from opus 5 > on par with astra > faster than opus 5 > way better at frontend and 3d here’s one frontend test i ran and it’s the best output any model has given me even better than astra you can check fable 5.1 output with same prompt in QT and tbh opus 5.2 just mogs everyone here really hoping that anthropic will release this model officially this week

anthropic cooked hard with opus 5.2 after testing it for a whole day, i can say this model is so good > huge step up from opus 5 > on par with astra > faster than opus 5 > way better at frontend and 3d here’s one frontend test i ran and it’s the best output any model has given me even better than astra you can check fable 5.1 output with same prompt in QT and tbh opus 5.2 just mogs everyone here really hoping that anthropic will release this model officially this week

J A Z I I

40,402 次观看 • 8 天前

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

63,741 次观看 • 3 个月前

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Alex Nguyen

14,546 次观看 • 3 个月前

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

hiraeth

40,216 次观看 • 19 天前

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.

Bhavy☄️

64,542 次观看 • 8 天前

The upcoming new Opus model is exceptional at 3D tasks, particularly in environments like Roblox Studio. It outperforms both Fable 5.1 and 6 Astra at a lower cost, and is faster. Here's an example that blew me away. The game is fully explorable, and Opus added this tour. It didn't even finish as I had to cut it off (it had been switched back to old Opus and I didn't want any work ruined).

The upcoming new Opus model is exceptional at 3D tasks, particularly in environments like Roblox Studio. It outperforms both Fable 5.1 and 6 Astra at a lower cost, and is faster. Here's an example that blew me away. The game is fully explorable, and Opus added this tour. It didn't even finish as I had to cut it off (it had been switched back to old Opus and I didn't want any work ruined).

leo 🐾

104,871 次观看 • 5 天前

deepseek v4.1 flash vs secret model tested both with the same prompt at the highest reasoning available > v4.1 flash took 2 hours to finish both tests and cost $2.60 > secret model finished both in 30 minutes, can’t reveal cost yet v4.1 flash spent a lot of time overthinking and running random tests, which slowed it down thanks AIHubmix for providing api access so i could test v4.1 flash hoping that team will cut down the overthinking before the full release, but for now here are the results which model did better here?

deepseek v4.1 flash vs secret model tested both with the same prompt at the highest reasoning available > v4.1 flash took 2 hours to finish both tests and cost $2.60 > secret model finished both in 30 minutes, can’t reveal cost yet v4.1 flash spent a lot of time overthinking and running random tests, which slowed it down thanks AIHubmix for providing api access so i could test v4.1 flash hoping that team will cut down the overthinking before the full release, but for now here are the results which model did better here?

J A Z I I

29,132 次观看 • 15 天前

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

opus 5 is getting routed to opus 5.2 tested opus 5 on xhigh with the same prompt in devin and claude code but results came out really different > claude code one is clean and more detailed > while devin one is almost there but not the same opus 5 in cc used to be lazy and hard to communicate with, but something changed in the last 2 days now it works for longer and is way easier to communicate with anthropic did same with fable release too where some users were being routed to fable 5.1 so it’s very likely opus 5 is getting routed to 5.2 in claude code can you guys tests and lemme know if it's getting routed for you or not?

J A Z I I

140,113 次观看 • 9 天前

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 次观看 • 2 个月前