正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

opus 5 test

Taelin

78,220 subscribers

36,723 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai

Jun Song

118,502 次观看 • 13 天前

Claude Opus 4.7 vs 4.8 side-by-side canvas test

Claude Opus 4.7 vs 4.8 side-by-side canvas test

stevibe

475,858 次观看 • 2 个月前

Opus 5 reaction.

Opus 5 reaction.

Matthew Berman

39,894 次观看 • 4 天前

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

Opus 5 vs Fable 5 $4.20 vs $9.60

shirish

301,573 次观看 • 4 天前

Opus 5 is a really good model.

Opus 5 is a really good model.

Theo - t3.gg

128,609 次观看 • 3 天前

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

stevibe

60,788 次观看 • 27 天前

Opus 5, snowboarder test, one shot. On par with Fable, ahead of every other model I've run. No visual defects on the first pass, and the sliding physics feel right.

Opus 5, snowboarder test, one shot. On par with Fable, ahead of every other model I've run. No visual defects on the first pass, and the sliding physics feel right.

Alex Ermolov

2,452,195 次观看 • 4 天前

Weather card by Opus 5 one hot

Weather card by Opus 5 one hot

Chetaslua

100,646 次观看 • 5 天前

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

GMI Cloud

86,444 次观看 • 1 个月前

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

i tried Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5 Max. Claude Opus 5.0 is quite the AGI beast in 3D, the texture and details are absolutely insane. Fable one shotted this though, could be improved. credit to Chetaslua for the Opus 5 code.

sui ☄️

259,811 次观看 • 5 天前

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

695,877 次观看 • 3 个月前

Test test test

Test test test

Rafael Martín

130,817 次观看 • 1 年前

Opus 5 subway FPS Result, best one yet IMO

Opus 5 subway FPS Result, best one yet IMO

BijanBowen

86,735 次观看 • 4 天前

test test test, dubai.

test test test, dubai.

Farza 🇵🇰🇺🇸

17,452 次观看 • 7 个月前

Minecraft by Opus 5 - this is all time best creation

Minecraft by Opus 5 - this is all time best creation

Chetaslua

192,428 次观看 • 4 天前

Tried Opus 4.8 (Max) with my Minecraft test It's not bad, it's much better than Opus 4.7, but definitely not a big jump in capabilities At least everything worked one-shot Total cost: $9-10

Tried Opus 4.8 (Max) with my Minecraft test It's not bad, it's much better than Opus 4.7, but definitely not a big jump in capabilities At least everything worked one-shot Total cost: $9-10

Angel 🌼

110,085 次观看 • 2 个月前

Test test ✨

Test test ✨

Dain Yoon

32,380 次观看 • 1 年前

test test #Live2D #Live2DWIP

test test #Live2D #Live2DWIP

Malii🥨Live2d

11,057 次观看 • 5 个月前

test test 🤍🤍

Sensitive content

test test 🤍🤍

Aurorax

23,359 次观看 • 1 年前

test test #Live2D #Live2DWIP

test test #Live2D #Live2DWIP

Luxanna🐼✨Live2d

79,469 次观看 • 3 个月前