Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

"Our conditions are clear and are considered rational, constructive, and reasonable by everyone, so I simply must have them. Period. Regarding matters that threaten the financial security of Euroclear and Belgium, no flexibility is possible," says Prime Minister Bart De Wever. Reporter: Is postponement still an option for you?... Regarding this: does it have to happen now, today or tomorrow? Bart De Wever: Gosh, that will depend on the dynamics of the meetings, won't it. Europe is a bit like Belgium, I must say. It’s in the final moments that suddenly a lot starts moving. A great deal of text begins to shift. So, we were busy with the Commission until very late yesterday. We also started very early with the Commission this morning. At this moment, I can’t even say what will ultimately be on the table in the drafting. So, even less can I clarify to you right now what our position will be. That will depend on which texts are actually on the table starting from 10 o'clock. I don't know at this moment. Reporter: But the use of Euroclear at this moment remains a "no"? With what is currently on the table? Bart De Wever: We have set conditions. They are clear and they are known. Reporter: And they haven't been met yet? Bart De Wever: I explained them in Copenhagen. I have repeated them repeatedly. They have also been technically developed; they are underpinned. They are considered by everyone to be rational, constructive, and reasonable. So, I simply must have them. Period. There are dealbreakers that must be removed from that text. Period. And otherwise, they will have to carry me out of there. Period. And I think everyone has understood that. I can obviously make a compromise on things of less direct importance. But on a number of matters that threaten the financial security of Euroclear and Belgium, no flexibility is possible. Let that be very clear. Im-pos-sible. And then, as far as I'm concerned, it won't happen. And I’m not giving up. And I give myself a very good chance. But let's not assume that yet. Perhaps it is possible to pull our dealbreakers out of the text, and then this might still end well. Reporter: Was there contact with other leaders yesterday? Bart De Wever: I’d rather not go into that, but well... If I say that, then you know the answer is "yes." Reporter: And Mr. Zelenskyy, have you heard from him? He is also coming "in person" today. Does that change anything? Bart De Wever: I’m not going to list everyone I’ve spoken to. Because then you could go through the whole list, and it’s a surprisingly long list.”show more

Yasmina

20,041 subscribers

35,512 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

[Q]: Mr. President, how concerned are you that by describing Europe as lost, you may actually alienate Europeans and make them less willing to help you in the future? [President Zelenskyy]: About Europe - there are very strong leaders, and they know what to do. They have to be - they have to rush. For example, I can tell you very, very honestly - we spoke about it - that in 2040 Russia will have an army of 2, 2.5 million people. They will have it. We will have a ceasefire, or we will not have a ceasefire. It will be a pause in this war, or, God bless, it will be the end of this war with really strong security guarantees. But we don't know if Russia will come back. What they need, what their goals are - nobody knows. So my suggestion - and I think about our families and our children - my suggestion to Europe is that Russia will want to try who is strong in Europe.

[Q]: Mr. President, how concerned are you that by describing Europe as lost, you may actually alienate Europeans and make them less willing to help you in the future? [President Zelenskyy]: About Europe - there are very strong leaders, and they know what to do. They have to be - they have to rush. For example, I can tell you very, very honestly - we spoke about it - that in 2040 Russia will have an army of 2, 2.5 million people. They will have it. We will have a ceasefire, or we will not have a ceasefire. It will be a pause in this war, or, God bless, it will be the end of this war with really strong security guarantees. But we don't know if Russia will come back. What they need, what their goals are - nobody knows. So my suggestion - and I think about our families and our children - my suggestion to Europe is that Russia will want to try who is strong in Europe.

Anton Gerashchenko

280,333 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,482 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Finally, Belgian PM, Bart De Wever, isn't afraid to say 'putin isn't getting a cent back'. Period. Bart De Wever, Belgian PM: "Is the reparation loan off the table? I think the text is very, very good because it mentions, of course, that we have no intention whatsoever of giving the immobilised assets back to putin. We have no intention of letting somebody else outside Europe decide about this. They have been immobilised for an indefinite period. It is the Europeans who will decide what happens to it, and our intention is to give it to Ukraine as the reparation. It's a reparation loan, the word says it itself. It serves to reparate what has been done to you by the aggressor. And that idea is still in the text, and I'm 100% behind it." This is how you play hardball. Overall, De Wever’s phrasing is a strong "Euro-maximalist" position. By framing it as a "reparation loan," he’s bridging the gap between legal caution and the moral demand to make Russia pay.

Finally, Belgian PM, Bart De Wever, isn't afraid to say 'putin isn't getting a cent back'. Period. Bart De Wever, Belgian PM: "Is the reparation loan off the table? I think the text is very, very good because it mentions, of course, that we have no intention whatsoever of giving the immobilised assets back to putin. We have no intention of letting somebody else outside Europe decide about this. They have been immobilised for an indefinite period. It is the Europeans who will decide what happens to it, and our intention is to give it to Ukraine as the reparation. It's a reparation loan, the word says it itself. It serves to reparate what has been done to you by the aggressor. And that idea is still in the text, and I'm 100% behind it." This is how you play hardball. Overall, De Wever’s phrasing is a strong "Euro-maximalist" position. By framing it as a "reparation loan," he’s bridging the gap between legal caution and the moral demand to make Russia pay.

Yasmina

60,091 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"We have talked directly to the White House...and we are providing them with a list of people that will be given immunity." ~Luna (That would be fantastic! Let's see if it happens, and let's see if WE get to hear from those whistleblowers and it's not just behind closed doors.) Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: "The one thing, specifically, people say: We want to know where locations of craft and biologics are,' right? So, we know for a fact that there have been a few very credible whistleblowers that we've talked to that allege that they have information specifically pertaining to this, but they are afraid of losing their clearances. "So we have talked directly to the White House - Stephen Miller (Stephen Miller) is absolutely incredible on this topic - and we are providing them with a list of people that will be given immunity, in that they will not have to face retribution in the future for violation of their security clearance, or in some cases, maybe the Espionage Act, whatever it might be. "And that will be them going to the White House, divulging what information they have, and we're following up on it. I'm not saying that I have personally seen stuff, I haven't. But what I am saying is that we are taking the information that we have received, we are handing it off, we are going to get them immunity and protection so that they can divulge that information, and let's see where it leads."

"We have talked directly to the White House...and we are providing them with a list of people that will be given immunity." ~Luna (That would be fantastic! Let's see if it happens, and let's see if WE get to hear from those whistleblowers and it's not just behind closed doors.) Rep. Anna Paulina Luna: "The one thing, specifically, people say: We want to know where locations of craft and biologics are,' right? So, we know for a fact that there have been a few very credible whistleblowers that we've talked to that allege that they have information specifically pertaining to this, but they are afraid of losing their clearances. "So we have talked directly to the White House - Stephen Miller (Stephen Miller) is absolutely incredible on this topic - and we are providing them with a list of people that will be given immunity, in that they will not have to face retribution in the future for violation of their security clearance, or in some cases, maybe the Espionage Act, whatever it might be. "And that will be them going to the White House, divulging what information they have, and we're following up on it. I'm not saying that I have personally seen stuff, I haven't. But what I am saying is that we are taking the information that we have received, we are handing it off, we are going to get them immunity and protection so that they can divulge that information, and let's see where it leads."

Joe Murgia

17,341 просмотров • 5 дней назад

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."

Eric Daugherty

304,474 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🦖: I don’t feel anything (about the situation). It all started because of my fan and (the post) said “Why do gay tops like to wear Stussy?”. I felt like teasing them so I said “Because it is cool”. Then some people said “But with this style/appearance, you do not seem like a top”. When I express myself, no matter what I am, it is something that came out of my mouth. So I feel that when there are people who would judge, for example, when you stated, “you are a male”, but there is someone who says, “But you are not a male”. How would you know what that person is? isn’t that right? Regarding the topic of gender and preference in terms of your role during intercourse, it is a private and sensitive matter. Since you are not living with them, you have no reason to judge them on whether they are a top or bottom. I feel that we have no right to judge people on these matters. In 2025, everyone can choose who they want to be and in these times, the world is more open-minded. Anything can happen. This kind of thing is fluid and a very personal matter. 🦖: I feel that when it is a very personal and sensitive thing, there might be a certain group of people who are not be comfortable expressing that they are not straight. Besides not being straight, this also includes having to state their sexual preference or their role during intercourse. It is way beyond that. So I feel that if they are comfortable expressing who they are, but you just feel that their outward appearance does not align with what you think, and then you judge them by saying “But this is not right, this appearance should be a bottom. There is no way.” How would you know? Isn’t that right? OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija

Sensitive content

🦖: I don’t feel anything (about the situation). It all started because of my fan and (the post) said “Why do gay tops like to wear Stussy?”. I felt like teasing them so I said “Because it is cool”. Then some people said “But with this style/appearance, you do not seem like a top”. When I express myself, no matter what I am, it is something that came out of my mouth. So I feel that when there are people who would judge, for example, when you stated, “you are a male”, but there is someone who says, “But you are not a male”. How would you know what that person is? isn’t that right? Regarding the topic of gender and preference in terms of your role during intercourse, it is a private and sensitive matter. Since you are not living with them, you have no reason to judge them on whether they are a top or bottom. I feel that we have no right to judge people on these matters. In 2025, everyone can choose who they want to be and in these times, the world is more open-minded. Anything can happen. This kind of thing is fluid and a very personal matter. 🦖: I feel that when it is a very personal and sensitive thing, there might be a certain group of people who are not be comfortable expressing that they are not straight. Besides not being straight, this also includes having to state their sexual preference or their role during intercourse. It is way beyond that. So I feel that if they are comfortable expressing who they are, but you just feel that their outward appearance does not align with what you think, and then you judge them by saying “But this is not right, this appearance should be a bottom. There is no way.” How would you know? Isn’t that right? OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija

𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐦.

247,383 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨THE SOUND WAS VERY BAD, BUT I DID MY BEST TO DECIPHER THE OPENING REMARKS OF TRUMP AND ZELENSKYY: Q: President Trump, do you think Putin is serious about peace this time? TRUMP: I do. I do. I think he is. I think they both are. Q: What was your message to Putin? TRUMP: You got to make a deal. Got to get it done. Too many people dying and I think both presidents want to make a deal. I really do. I made a brief phone call. Q: Do you meet Putin again soon? TRUMP: It depends. It depends. But I do believe that we have the makings of a deal that's good for Ukraine, good for everybody and that's very important. "There's nothing more important", - my book. We settled eight wars and this is the most difficult one. I thought it would be in the middle of the pack. This, this is the most difficult one, but we're gonna get it done. We're gonna have a great meeting today. This gentleman has worked very hard, and is very brave, and his people are very brave. I mean, what they've gone through, no nation... very rarely a nation ever had to go through this. So, we're gonna have a very good meeting today, I think. And I'm also calling President Putin back after the meeting and we'll continue our negotiation. Pretty complex, but not that complex. Q: Do you expect any deadline? TRUMP: I don't have deadlines. I have... You know what my deadline is? Getting the war ended. We don't have deadlines, do you agree with that? ZELENSKYY: yes... finish, as quick as possible Q: Are you prepared to sign the security agreement today? TRUMP: Well, it depends what the security agreement says. What a dumb question. Nobody even knows what the security agreement is going to say. But there will be a security agreement. It'll be a strong agreement, and the European nations are very much involved in that. They'll be very much involved in protection, et cetera. But the European nations have been really great. They're very much in line with this meeting and getting a deal done. They are all in... They're terrific people. I think you can say that. There's no, nobody there. They all want to get it done and they've been very supportive, I think. President, do you have anything to say? ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much Mr. President. Thank you for this meeting. Thank you for your invitation. Yes, really, I agree with President. Our teams, they do what they can. And I think that during last month, they moved forward with negotiations and Americans... thank you very much for your team, Steve and Jared, they worked very well. They worked on different documents. I hope that all these documents can bring peace as soon as possible. And, I agree with president that really the Europeans were very supportive. The president is on the contact with them, and maybe we will have the phone contact with them. TRUMP: We can call them, today Q: Why did you want to meet with President at Mar-a-Lago today? ZELENSKYY: Why? So we have... we spoke with our teams. They worked on 20 points plan. Then they worked on prosperity and security document. And 20 points plan is very important to discuss and sequencing that. It's very important. Our teams talked about the strategy, how to take step by step and to bring peace closer. And we will discuss this strategy. Q: President Zelenskyy, are you gonna make territorial concessions? ZELENSKYY: When we speak about 20 points plan, there is... They are, in 20 points plan, - 90% by the way, was done by our two teams, - I think they made a great job, great work. And yes, we will discuss these points also. TRUMP: And there are great economic benefits for Ukraine also, cause you know, there's a lot of rebuilding to do and there's a lot of wealth to be had. And they have great wealth, potentially they have great wealth. They wanna get started. But there is great economic benefit for Ukraine in what we're talking about. Q: President Trump, some are saying that the recent attacks in the past couple days, that Russia has staged against Ukraine, shows that President Putin isn't serious about peace. What is your reaction to that? TRUMP: No, he's very serious. I can say that I believe Ukraine has made some very strong attacks also. And I don't say that negatively. I think he'd probably have to. I don't say that negatively, you understand that? (to Zelenskyy) I think, now he hasn't told me that, but there have been some explosions in various parts of Russia, and it looks to me like, I don't know, I don't think it came from the Congo. I don't think it came from the United States of America. It possibly came from Ukraine, but I haven't asked that question. Maybe I won't bother asking. You know they're fighting a war and we'll see what happens. But I believe it's a war that... and we have two willing parties, we have two willing countries, they wanna see it end. Look, the people of Ukraine want it to end, and the people of Russia want it to end, and the two leaders want it to end. Q: Regarding the economic benefits for Ukraine: Europe is holding some billions of frozen Russian assets. Do you believe that should go to help rebuild Ukraine or go back to Russia again? TRUMP: None of that's been determined. But it'll go, it's gonna go very quickly. I think we're very, we're in final stages of talking and we're gonna see. Otherwise, it's gonna go on for a long time. It'll either end or it's gonna go on for a long time and millions of additional people are gonna be killed. Millions. And nobody wants that. Q: Mr. President (Trump), are you expecting to get to an agreement today? TRUMP: I just think we can do, I think we can move very rapidly. I really feel that. We've spoken. I know you had dinner with Steve. Steve Wickoff and Jared have done a fantastic job. And everybody has. Marco has been incredible. The whole group has been, our group has been incredible. And Ukraine appreciates it, and Russia appreciates it. They both want to see it end, and we're gonna get it ended. Thank you very much, everybody. ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much. TRUMP: We'll see you, I think, at the end. But I do think we'll call Europe also, we're gonna speak to the European leaders. Thank you very much.

🚨THE SOUND WAS VERY BAD, BUT I DID MY BEST TO DECIPHER THE OPENING REMARKS OF TRUMP AND ZELENSKYY: Q: President Trump, do you think Putin is serious about peace this time? TRUMP: I do. I do. I think he is. I think they both are. Q: What was your message to Putin? TRUMP: You got to make a deal. Got to get it done. Too many people dying and I think both presidents want to make a deal. I really do. I made a brief phone call. Q: Do you meet Putin again soon? TRUMP: It depends. It depends. But I do believe that we have the makings of a deal that's good for Ukraine, good for everybody and that's very important. "There's nothing more important", - my book. We settled eight wars and this is the most difficult one. I thought it would be in the middle of the pack. This, this is the most difficult one, but we're gonna get it done. We're gonna have a great meeting today. This gentleman has worked very hard, and is very brave, and his people are very brave. I mean, what they've gone through, no nation... very rarely a nation ever had to go through this. So, we're gonna have a very good meeting today, I think. And I'm also calling President Putin back after the meeting and we'll continue our negotiation. Pretty complex, but not that complex. Q: Do you expect any deadline? TRUMP: I don't have deadlines. I have... You know what my deadline is? Getting the war ended. We don't have deadlines, do you agree with that? ZELENSKYY: yes... finish, as quick as possible Q: Are you prepared to sign the security agreement today? TRUMP: Well, it depends what the security agreement says. What a dumb question. Nobody even knows what the security agreement is going to say. But there will be a security agreement. It'll be a strong agreement, and the European nations are very much involved in that. They'll be very much involved in protection, et cetera. But the European nations have been really great. They're very much in line with this meeting and getting a deal done. They are all in... They're terrific people. I think you can say that. There's no, nobody there. They all want to get it done and they've been very supportive, I think. President, do you have anything to say? ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much Mr. President. Thank you for this meeting. Thank you for your invitation. Yes, really, I agree with President. Our teams, they do what they can. And I think that during last month, they moved forward with negotiations and Americans... thank you very much for your team, Steve and Jared, they worked very well. They worked on different documents. I hope that all these documents can bring peace as soon as possible. And, I agree with president that really the Europeans were very supportive. The president is on the contact with them, and maybe we will have the phone contact with them. TRUMP: We can call them, today Q: Why did you want to meet with President at Mar-a-Lago today? ZELENSKYY: Why? So we have... we spoke with our teams. They worked on 20 points plan. Then they worked on prosperity and security document. And 20 points plan is very important to discuss and sequencing that. It's very important. Our teams talked about the strategy, how to take step by step and to bring peace closer. And we will discuss this strategy. Q: President Zelenskyy, are you gonna make territorial concessions? ZELENSKYY: When we speak about 20 points plan, there is... They are, in 20 points plan, - 90% by the way, was done by our two teams, - I think they made a great job, great work. And yes, we will discuss these points also. TRUMP: And there are great economic benefits for Ukraine also, cause you know, there's a lot of rebuilding to do and there's a lot of wealth to be had. And they have great wealth, potentially they have great wealth. They wanna get started. But there is great economic benefit for Ukraine in what we're talking about. Q: President Trump, some are saying that the recent attacks in the past couple days, that Russia has staged against Ukraine, shows that President Putin isn't serious about peace. What is your reaction to that? TRUMP: No, he's very serious. I can say that I believe Ukraine has made some very strong attacks also. And I don't say that negatively. I think he'd probably have to. I don't say that negatively, you understand that? (to Zelenskyy) I think, now he hasn't told me that, but there have been some explosions in various parts of Russia, and it looks to me like, I don't know, I don't think it came from the Congo. I don't think it came from the United States of America. It possibly came from Ukraine, but I haven't asked that question. Maybe I won't bother asking. You know they're fighting a war and we'll see what happens. But I believe it's a war that... and we have two willing parties, we have two willing countries, they wanna see it end. Look, the people of Ukraine want it to end, and the people of Russia want it to end, and the two leaders want it to end. Q: Regarding the economic benefits for Ukraine: Europe is holding some billions of frozen Russian assets. Do you believe that should go to help rebuild Ukraine or go back to Russia again? TRUMP: None of that's been determined. But it'll go, it's gonna go very quickly. I think we're very, we're in final stages of talking and we're gonna see. Otherwise, it's gonna go on for a long time. It'll either end or it's gonna go on for a long time and millions of additional people are gonna be killed. Millions. And nobody wants that. Q: Mr. President (Trump), are you expecting to get to an agreement today? TRUMP: I just think we can do, I think we can move very rapidly. I really feel that. We've spoken. I know you had dinner with Steve. Steve Wickoff and Jared have done a fantastic job. And everybody has. Marco has been incredible. The whole group has been, our group has been incredible. And Ukraine appreciates it, and Russia appreciates it. They both want to see it end, and we're gonna get it ended. Thank you very much, everybody. ZELENSKYY: Thank you so much. TRUMP: We'll see you, I think, at the end. But I do think we'll call Europe also, we're gonna speak to the European leaders. Thank you very much.

Kateryna Lisunova

140,749 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

PM Frederiksen: we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately. Can you imagine? I mean, it's like minus 25 degrees and then you attack the energy system. I mean, it's so crazy that only Russians would do such a thing. But this is how Russia is and it will not change. And I think our problem in Ukraine is still that there are still red lines when it comes to the weapons they can use to win this war. And you cannot win a war with the one hand tied on your back. We need to give them weapons so they can strike into Russia. We have had this discussion for several years. We are still discussing it. I mean, for the last three years on this conference, I have said, why are we not providing them the air defense that they need? And everybody is doing like this. They still lack air defense. You cannot protect a country without air defense. We know exactly what we need to deliver, including, of course, membership of NATO, because if they were a NATO member now, we would be in a completely different situation now. So, we know what to do. But first of all, we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately.

PM Frederiksen: we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately. Can you imagine? I mean, it's like minus 25 degrees and then you attack the energy system. I mean, it's so crazy that only Russians would do such a thing. But this is how Russia is and it will not change. And I think our problem in Ukraine is still that there are still red lines when it comes to the weapons they can use to win this war. And you cannot win a war with the one hand tied on your back. We need to give them weapons so they can strike into Russia. We have had this discussion for several years. We are still discussing it. I mean, for the last three years on this conference, I have said, why are we not providing them the air defense that they need? And everybody is doing like this. They still lack air defense. You cannot protect a country without air defense. We know exactly what we need to deliver, including, of course, membership of NATO, because if they were a NATO member now, we would be in a completely different situation now. So, we know what to do. But first of all, we have to recognize, we have to understand, we have to learn that Russia will not change and they are not interested in peace, unfortunately.

Anton Gerashchenko

105,935 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever: The Russian assets will remain immobilized until the end of the war. That means that, as has always been the case in history, once there is a peace deal, those assets will be on the table. Let me be very clear about this. If it were up to me, every single euro of that money would be used for reparations and for the reconstruction of Ukraine. I would be very sad to see even one euro returned to Moscow. That said, we must respect international law. The decision will be taken at that moment. Between now and then, Europe will finance Ukraine’s war effort — as it should — because Ukrainians are fighting for all of us.

Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever: The Russian assets will remain immobilized until the end of the war. That means that, as has always been the case in history, once there is a peace deal, those assets will be on the table. Let me be very clear about this. If it were up to me, every single euro of that money would be used for reparations and for the reconstruction of Ukraine. I would be very sad to see even one euro returned to Moscow. That said, we must respect international law. The decision will be taken at that moment. Between now and then, Europe will finance Ukraine’s war effort — as it should — because Ukrainians are fighting for all of us.

Clash Report

22,525 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever: We must integrate our market and also be able to use it as a weapon. We must re-arm ourselves to be able to stand on our own two feet. We must enter into alliances with countries that also still embrace the “rules-based world.” There are many of those. And then we might stand a bit stronger, and people will hesitate a bit more before they dare to bully us. Because that is actually what is happening here.

Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever: We must integrate our market and also be able to use it as a weapon. We must re-arm ourselves to be able to stand on our own two feet. We must enter into alliances with countries that also still embrace the “rules-based world.” There are many of those. And then we might stand a bit stronger, and people will hesitate a bit more before they dare to bully us. Because that is actually what is happening here.

Clash Report

21,011 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Arteta on his role to re-energise the Arsenal team. 💪 “Certainly, when you lose a game, you have a lot of feelings because, especially, this group of players are so competitive and they seek for excellence and when you don't reach it, you ask yourself questions, and we did that. “But I think my role there as well is to bring optimism and reality about where we are, and yeah, our club has a long history. And to find a moment where, in February, we're in the position that we are, is very difficult to find. So guys, we are doing so many things so well, and let's focus mainly on that. And for sure, we want to improve, we want to be better in every area, but with that sense as well of self-confidence and conviction that we are in the right path. Anyone need to lift Arteta? “No, in these moments, no. Normally, I'm the opposite and when we are doing so well, I'm there with a stick to say, 'This is not good enough,' 'This is not good enough.' The other day, no, because I know how much they wanted the amount of games and the demands that we put on those players every day. “In those moments, they need to understand and feel that we are right behind them. I'm mainly responsible for that and they keep playing with that freedom, with that enjoyment, as I discussed the other day, and I make sure that that journey is beautiful because what is ahead is great and everybody has to be part of that but in a good sense and with good humor and with good optimism and looking forward to it.”

Arteta on his role to re-energise the Arsenal team. 💪 “Certainly, when you lose a game, you have a lot of feelings because, especially, this group of players are so competitive and they seek for excellence and when you don't reach it, you ask yourself questions, and we did that. “But I think my role there as well is to bring optimism and reality about where we are, and yeah, our club has a long history. And to find a moment where, in February, we're in the position that we are, is very difficult to find. So guys, we are doing so many things so well, and let's focus mainly on that. And for sure, we want to improve, we want to be better in every area, but with that sense as well of self-confidence and conviction that we are in the right path. Anyone need to lift Arteta? “No, in these moments, no. Normally, I'm the opposite and when we are doing so well, I'm there with a stick to say, 'This is not good enough,' 'This is not good enough.' The other day, no, because I know how much they wanted the amount of games and the demands that we put on those players every day. “In those moments, they need to understand and feel that we are right behind them. I'm mainly responsible for that and they keep playing with that freedom, with that enjoyment, as I discussed the other day, and I make sure that that journey is beautiful because what is ahead is great and everybody has to be part of that but in a good sense and with good humor and with good optimism and looking forward to it.”

Connor Humm

17,767 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🛑 Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 - Captain with school boys and girls! The young Captain was having a conversation with the pupils, and here is what he saying, “I was telling you a while ago, in school they were telling us that we couldn’t do it here. They lied to us. We grow wheat here, and it works well, and we will develop it. Some people have started, this year, I was able to see people who did it, as part of the presidential initiative, and I was told that in the past, some were able to do it and they produced it well. Currently, we are sowing wheat in some farmlands as part do the presidential initiative. What you eat must be produced here. So, this is why I say that we will teach you many things, and we will review the curricula they teach you. For those who drink coffee, they told us that your coffee, chocolate, it is only in the countries with abundant rainfalls, that here is only savanna, desert, it does not rain, we cannot farm. Again, they lied to us. It’s not true! Coffee grows well here, cocoa grows well too. There are people here who have the farms here, even in Ouagadougou here, there are people who have cocoa trees in their yards. This means that, chocolate that children envy those from well to do familes can be manufactured here in Burkina and all the children can eat chocolate in Burkina. We found out it is possible. As for milk, why do we have to import it? We can do it. I just want to tell you that there are many things that they never told us the truth about. You guys are lucky, we are now teaching you, and we promise you that we will do all we can so that you can eat your fill. As we say, you will eat well in the morning before you go to school, you will go to school for free, you will eat lunch, you will have fun, and in the afternoon, when you return home, you will have fun in the neighborhood, then in the evening, you will learn and review your homework and sleep. This is the dream we have. As long as the children in Burkina are not in these conditions, our fight will not stop. Ok? (Claps). So, we know these are your aspirations and it is right and legal. Any parent is fighting for this. Even those who do not have children fight in the hope of having children and to take care of them, so that they can live in better conditions, and be better than them. This is the fight of everyone, this is the fight of every generation. We are lucky God gave us everything. Do you know that everywhere in Burkina we can farm? Everywhere! In the Sahel where they tell you it is the desert, it is only sand, we can farm. As for us, we have been lied to so much, it is the brainwashing of the colonizer. He did that so that we may not think 💭. But we finally found out that everything was a lie ( damn lie, emphasis is mine). If God left many lakes in that desert, He knows why. We can farm everything in Burkina, we can do everything, the land is fertile. And there are so many natural things in Burkina that we never planted but they were here, isn’t it ? Have you ever learned how to plant a shea tree in Burkina? You were born and found them already here right? It is there in the wild in nature. You know it is a gift from God. There are many things in the shea fruit. You have the shea butter, that is oil; do you know that there is chocolate in it? There are seven derivatives in the shea fruit. You also have the Parkia biglobosa (also known as the African locust bean) which is a natural fruit. We have many things, it is not only the minerals in the soil. Even with the soil, we were told that it’s ferralitic soil, that it is not fertile, everything is a lie. You see that today there is so much gold in Burkina. But it is just poorly managed. Our mission is to well manage these resources, and to take good care of you, so that you can be in your basic rights, to lead a good life, to go to school, and that we may protect you. And also that you may fulfill your duties, because your duties are very important, aren’t they?…

🛑 Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 - Captain with school boys and girls! The young Captain was having a conversation with the pupils, and here is what he saying, “I was telling you a while ago, in school they were telling us that we couldn’t do it here. They lied to us. We grow wheat here, and it works well, and we will develop it. Some people have started, this year, I was able to see people who did it, as part of the presidential initiative, and I was told that in the past, some were able to do it and they produced it well. Currently, we are sowing wheat in some farmlands as part do the presidential initiative. What you eat must be produced here. So, this is why I say that we will teach you many things, and we will review the curricula they teach you. For those who drink coffee, they told us that your coffee, chocolate, it is only in the countries with abundant rainfalls, that here is only savanna, desert, it does not rain, we cannot farm. Again, they lied to us. It’s not true! Coffee grows well here, cocoa grows well too. There are people here who have the farms here, even in Ouagadougou here, there are people who have cocoa trees in their yards. This means that, chocolate that children envy those from well to do familes can be manufactured here in Burkina and all the children can eat chocolate in Burkina. We found out it is possible. As for milk, why do we have to import it? We can do it. I just want to tell you that there are many things that they never told us the truth about. You guys are lucky, we are now teaching you, and we promise you that we will do all we can so that you can eat your fill. As we say, you will eat well in the morning before you go to school, you will go to school for free, you will eat lunch, you will have fun, and in the afternoon, when you return home, you will have fun in the neighborhood, then in the evening, you will learn and review your homework and sleep. This is the dream we have. As long as the children in Burkina are not in these conditions, our fight will not stop. Ok? (Claps). So, we know these are your aspirations and it is right and legal. Any parent is fighting for this. Even those who do not have children fight in the hope of having children and to take care of them, so that they can live in better conditions, and be better than them. This is the fight of everyone, this is the fight of every generation. We are lucky God gave us everything. Do you know that everywhere in Burkina we can farm? Everywhere! In the Sahel where they tell you it is the desert, it is only sand, we can farm. As for us, we have been lied to so much, it is the brainwashing of the colonizer. He did that so that we may not think 💭. But we finally found out that everything was a lie ( damn lie, emphasis is mine). If God left many lakes in that desert, He knows why. We can farm everything in Burkina, we can do everything, the land is fertile. And there are so many natural things in Burkina that we never planted but they were here, isn’t it ? Have you ever learned how to plant a shea tree in Burkina? You were born and found them already here right? It is there in the wild in nature. You know it is a gift from God. There are many things in the shea fruit. You have the shea butter, that is oil; do you know that there is chocolate in it? There are seven derivatives in the shea fruit. You also have the Parkia biglobosa (also known as the African locust bean) which is a natural fruit. We have many things, it is not only the minerals in the soil. Even with the soil, we were told that it’s ferralitic soil, that it is not fertile, everything is a lie. You see that today there is so much gold in Burkina. But it is just poorly managed. Our mission is to well manage these resources, and to take good care of you, so that you can be in your basic rights, to lead a good life, to go to school, and that we may protect you. And also that you may fulfill your duties, because your duties are very important, aren’t they?…

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

94,967 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume on judge throwing out Comey and James indictments: “I think the White House is right in calling this a technicality. The judge didn’t rule on the merits in any way and did not say they are legally deficient.” “What they said was the wrong person brought them, someone who should not have been in the position to do that. That seems to me to be something that can be corrected and it’s possible, even likely, that these charges will be reinstated.” “That doesn’t mean that they will prevail in the end.. but so far what we have is the dismissal for now on what really is a bit of a technicality.”

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume on judge throwing out Comey and James indictments: “I think the White House is right in calling this a technicality. The judge didn’t rule on the merits in any way and did not say they are legally deficient.” “What they said was the wrong person brought them, someone who should not have been in the position to do that. That seems to me to be something that can be corrected and it’s possible, even likely, that these charges will be reinstated.” “That doesn’t mean that they will prevail in the end.. but so far what we have is the dismissal for now on what really is a bit of a technicality.”

TV News Now

260,556 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~Extended Transcript from Segment~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

Joe Murgia

14,119 просмотров • 22 дней назад

#WATCH | Srinagar, J&K: On #PahalgamTerroristAttack, Actor Atul Kulkarni says "...After the Pahalgam terror attack, 90% of the bookings have been cancelled and the message of the terrorists was that if you are a tourist, then you should not visit Kashmir. So I thought that Kashmir is mine and this country is mine, so why should I not go there, I will definitely go to Kashmir and I will have to come here and tell this to the people...so I want to tell the rest of the countrymen that we should come here because if we do not come, the objective of the terrorists will be successful. We cannot let them win. This is the first time that they have sent a message or threatened the entire country and the world from Kashmir that you people should not come here. So it is not possible that 6 people will come and threaten 140 crore people. We will not be afraid...I will appeal to everyone to definitely come here."

#WATCH | Srinagar, J&K: On #PahalgamTerroristAttack, Actor Atul Kulkarni says "...After the Pahalgam terror attack, 90% of the bookings have been cancelled and the message of the terrorists was that if you are a tourist, then you should not visit Kashmir. So I thought that Kashmir is mine and this country is mine, so why should I not go there, I will definitely go to Kashmir and I will have to come here and tell this to the people...so I want to tell the rest of the countrymen that we should come here because if we do not come, the objective of the terrorists will be successful. We cannot let them win. This is the first time that they have sent a message or threatened the entire country and the world from Kashmir that you people should not come here. So it is not possible that 6 people will come and threaten 140 crore people. We will not be afraid...I will appeal to everyone to definitely come here."

ANI

15,452 просмотров • 1 год назад

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,556 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨#BREAKING - MARITIME LAW - Ok, this is epic, and it will blow your mind, if you don't even know it. Those who are awake will know. That's great and this is what we should share. So, your birth certificate is where it all begins. This is where much of the corruption begins. The moment you sign your BC, it is Maritime law. You are actually signing a form that classifies you as dead at sea. You become a commodity of the system and honestly you Google it, you research it and you probably have to be fair like I said, but it's true. You become um... In a sense, they seize all the assets and go into what they call a trust fund and then you have 6 years to declare yourself alive. Declare yourself still here and then you can regain your sovereignty. But we didn't know that. It was a system they had set up so that you and I and everyone else were traded like cattle on the stock market. So each of us has a trust fund. And depending on how old you are, it depends on how much money is there. So if you're over 50 or something, you've got millions in there because that's how long we've been traded for. And this is another thing that is also crazy. That's why the mortgage system is absolutely ruined. So when you go for a mortgage, you basically sign the papers and they always tell you, "come back in 3 days and we'll have the money." They then take that money out of their trust fund to pay for the house. So, that comes out of your trust fund in your name, which has been growing since you were born. They then charge you interest on your money, but they don't care about the monetary side. They want the house. So if you miss a payment, they'll miss out immediately, because they can repossess your house. For them the house is a commodity, an asset. Wait to share what the banks do, but this trust fund is where much of your money will come from and be returned to you. This is their money that they have earned from you. So, that's just one thing. Then you also have the tax side. Taxes have never been taken from us, it is illegal. It is a corrupt system. So, all the taxes that we pay, it is not that they are going to return them to us, like the exact amount of taxes that we paid. What I have heard on the channels is the fact that it will be bond based, so at a certain age you will get so much money back, at a certain age this... I think the 62+ category was like 110k or something like that. But obviously they'll know more about that when it comes, but that's where more money comes from. Honestly, you are ready to live a life of abundance. This is money that was ours, that should be ours, that we should have been living with to create a better life. Instead, they have put us in this corrupt system where they have been fighting and they are taking all of our money and keeping it for themselves. for themselves. I hope I have shed light on this. Many people ask where this abundance comes from. Remember that the 1% controlled 99% of the wealth that now comes back to us to live a completely different life. They will give us what is owed to us because we should never have fought like this. Join, it's not too late! 👇 ✅️

🚨#BREAKING - MARITIME LAW - Ok, this is epic, and it will blow your mind, if you don't even know it. Those who are awake will know. That's great and this is what we should share. So, your birth certificate is where it all begins. This is where much of the corruption begins. The moment you sign your BC, it is Maritime law. You are actually signing a form that classifies you as dead at sea. You become a commodity of the system and honestly you Google it, you research it and you probably have to be fair like I said, but it's true. You become um... In a sense, they seize all the assets and go into what they call a trust fund and then you have 6 years to declare yourself alive. Declare yourself still here and then you can regain your sovereignty. But we didn't know that. It was a system they had set up so that you and I and everyone else were traded like cattle on the stock market. So each of us has a trust fund. And depending on how old you are, it depends on how much money is there. So if you're over 50 or something, you've got millions in there because that's how long we've been traded for. And this is another thing that is also crazy. That's why the mortgage system is absolutely ruined. So when you go for a mortgage, you basically sign the papers and they always tell you, "come back in 3 days and we'll have the money." They then take that money out of their trust fund to pay for the house. So, that comes out of your trust fund in your name, which has been growing since you were born. They then charge you interest on your money, but they don't care about the monetary side. They want the house. So if you miss a payment, they'll miss out immediately, because they can repossess your house. For them the house is a commodity, an asset. Wait to share what the banks do, but this trust fund is where much of your money will come from and be returned to you. This is their money that they have earned from you. So, that's just one thing. Then you also have the tax side. Taxes have never been taken from us, it is illegal. It is a corrupt system. So, all the taxes that we pay, it is not that they are going to return them to us, like the exact amount of taxes that we paid. What I have heard on the channels is the fact that it will be bond based, so at a certain age you will get so much money back, at a certain age this... I think the 62+ category was like 110k or something like that. But obviously they'll know more about that when it comes, but that's where more money comes from. Honestly, you are ready to live a life of abundance. This is money that was ours, that should be ours, that we should have been living with to create a better life. Instead, they have put us in this corrupt system where they have been fighting and they are taking all of our money and keeping it for themselves. for themselves. I hope I have shed light on this. Many people ask where this abundance comes from. Remember that the 1% controlled 99% of the wealth that now comes back to us to live a completely different life. They will give us what is owed to us because we should never have fought like this. Join, it's not too late! 👇 ✅️

GP Q

616,516 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

22,746 просмотров • 8 дней назад

🚨🇮🇱🇹🇷🇪🇬Q: Are you concerned about what is happening in Egypt and Turkey? Netanyahu: "I think what is happening in Turkey is something that is a result of the decline in the power of Iran." "I think Erdogan forgot that the 400 years of the Ottoman Empire's rule came to an end." "Today, there is a strong state here called Israel. There is the Israel Defense Forces, there is a people in Israel, and there is a government in Israel, and it would be wise for him to calm down." "We will not allow anyone to threaten our existence, to threaten our security, and I think we have proven what we are capable of." "One power goes down, another power goes up. It is always like that. And you know which power must remain and continue to rise faster? The State of Israel." "I have held talks with the Egyptians and told them what I expect to be done." "Part of it has already been implemented. These are things that are simply the fulfillment of the agreement between us."

🚨🇮🇱🇹🇷🇪🇬Q: Are you concerned about what is happening in Egypt and Turkey? Netanyahu: "I think what is happening in Turkey is something that is a result of the decline in the power of Iran." "I think Erdogan forgot that the 400 years of the Ottoman Empire's rule came to an end." "Today, there is a strong state here called Israel. There is the Israel Defense Forces, there is a people in Israel, and there is a government in Israel, and it would be wise for him to calm down." "We will not allow anyone to threaten our existence, to threaten our security, and I think we have proven what we are capable of." "One power goes down, another power goes up. It is always like that. And you know which power must remain and continue to rise faster? The State of Israel." "I have held talks with the Egyptians and told them what I expect to be done." "Part of it has already been implemented. These are things that are simply the fulfillment of the agreement between us."

The Saviour

55,382 просмотров • 9 часов назад