Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Out or Not Out?
238,352 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
38 Kommentare
Out Glove was not in contact with the bat
W Ball
It's Out if it hitting the stumps after checking the lbw
It would definitely hit the stumps
Out LBW, rule 33 can't be caught if the hand hit is not in contact with the bat, but LBW is possible if the LBW conditions are met (fair ball, struck inline, ball going on to hit the stumps, umpire gives the decision of OUT.....)
Not out
The ball didn't touch the bat and the glove isn't in contact with the bat at the time of ball hitting the glove.
Just checked it is showing out, if bat was not in contact with glove My mistake What actually umpire given ???
It's Out
Philippe? 🙄
Out ✅
If you are not holding the Bat and that non holding hand were to obstruct a pitched legal delivery by a bowler Then it literally means you are using a part of your body to obstruct the ball and IF Umpire were to detrmine that such a ball would have striken the wickets if unobstructed , its most definitely LBW aka OUT
Out. Glove not in contact with bat
OUT LBW that glove is actually a leg
LBW
Handling the ball
Out
Still LBW. I’ve seen players duck so low that the ball’s hit them in the shoulder and they’ve still been given out LBW.
Should be the same rules as Handled the ball
Potential LBW only
Not out coz it is NOT Leg Before Wicket, it hits the Glove....
Not out
Not out
Absolutely salmon trout.
Not out
Out
Out
Out
Not out Hand is like a bat That's y ur out if it hits ur hand and fielder catches u
Not out
Bat was not in hand
Out
It’s clear not out as ball touches the gloves first
If the glove is connect to bat it's a not out but he left the bat so it's out
Not out
Out
Out. Handling the ball.
Out. It's gonna hit the stumps . His hand is off the contact from bat hence touch on glove won't matter
Ähnliche Videos
Sensitive content
OUT or Not Out? IPL catch controversy!
That's Cricket
36,123 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten
