Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Over 12 years since its release, #Arma3 has expanded the Armaverse into a vast array of content. Widely regarded as the premier military sandbox on PC, it has an incredibly active and vibrant player and modding community that continues to thrive. For those who would like to try out...

43,876 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I think it’s about time Activision or Gameloop officials shared an update on the future of Call of Duty: Mobile on emulator. Gameloop is the only official emulator that allows you to experience the game on PC with a keyboard and mouse without the risk of being banned. However, the game hasn’t been updated on Gameloop for the past 3 months. The comment section of every official Gameloop post is filled with players asking for answers, yet officials are actively ignoring these concerns. I know many will argue about the necessity of playing a mobile game on PC, but it makes the title accessible to a wide range of players who aren't comfortable gaming on small screens. The game already has a full-fledged official PC edition, but it is currently exclusive to China. If Activision chose to, they could release it globally. This would be beneficial for them, especially since many PC and console players are frustrated with recent mainline CoD titles. Most agree that CoD: Mobile is the ideal game they want to play, but they just don’t want to play it on a phone. By releasing a dedicated PC version or restoring support on Gameloop, Activision could unlock a massive new player base, a percentage of whom would likely spend money in-game. It’s a win-win situation for both the developers and the players. The lack of communication needs to end! We need an official answer regarding the future of the game's global version on PC.

Call of Duty: Mobile News 📲

38,191 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Rajon Rondo gives his thoughts on the new-look Philadelphia 76ers and why he believes LeBron James could have them in position to win it all: “Brilliant move. I mean, he's got arguably the young best point guard in the game. I think he averaged 30 points a game this year. Bron is, like, you know, the king on the chessboard. You know, he has a lot of all the pieces, all the right pieces to make the right moves. we all know he's, he's a great basketball, one of the greatest basketball minds to play the game. If you give him these type of pieces to play with, you know, I, I'm an early bet with them being the favorites to win. You know, and my, and my book, I'm not a bettor, but if I was to bet, I would bet the Sixers early. Like I said, he Embiid, all those guys, no, like, nobody has to play 82 games. they can all spread out. You know, you got the, the combination of the hunger, the hot combination of wanting to prove something a lot of people talk bad about. You know, obviously, the JB'S, Bron and Embiid, you got a nice combination of guys that have a lot of fuel and a fire left at the proof something this year and again in the playoffs. They get to the playoffs healthy. LeBron on the court, you know, the player he is. Obviously, we all know who he is. He has Tyrese Maxey as, as a weapon. He has JB. Um, he doesnt have to play any defense. He can talk the entire backs out on defense side of the ball, put guys in the right spot, and then again in fourth quarter control and manipulating outsmart whoever is the opposite best player on the team. And he doesn't have to do it physically so much with his mind, because he has better weapons around him now—young, athletic guys that can do a lot of and play multiple, you know, multiple positions. And then again, if, if Embiid gets to the playoffs with LeBron, if he listens to LeBron and follows his lead, you know how he's a, he's a pro. And like I said, they get all the juju out of that organization. Everything, you know, good karma happens for those guys. They got a great chance to get it done.”

MAL

37,354 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

What happens to a country when its leaders stop asking what kind of nation they want to preserve? Immigration is a subject where people can have completely different opinions, but there is a basic question that is difficult to avoid. How much immigration can a country absorb while still maintaining control over its borders, its institutions, its infrastructure, and its sense of national identity? The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, but that doesn't mean immigration policy has to be unlimited or that a country has no right to decide who enters and under what conditions. Congress has broad constitutional authority over immigration, including the power to establish rules governing admission and exclusion. There's also a difference between having compassion for individual people and claiming that a government should be able to enforce its own immigration laws. Those ideas don't have to contradict each other. If a nation can't control who enters its territory, enforce the laws it has on the books, or determine the scale and pace of immigration, then the question becomes much bigger than immigration itself. It becomes a question of sovereignty and whether citizens still have meaningful control over the direction of their own country. And that's where the conversation gets uncomfortable. We can debate how many immigrants should be admitted, what legal pathways should look like, and how enforcement should work. But pretending there are no consequences to immigration policy doesn't make those consequences disappear. A country has limited resources, limited infrastructure, and a population with its own history and institutions. Citizens have every right to ask what policies best serve the long term interests of the nation they inherited and hope to pass on to their children. The real question isn't whether America should have immigration. It is whether Americans are still willing to have an honest conversation about what level of immigration is sustainable and what kind of country they want to preserve. If we don't decide what we want our nation to remain, who will?

Declaration of Memes

17,122 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"Bet he only does the story and nothing else". Man you look dumb af right now. I guarantee you that I play the game more than you and support the game financially a shit ton, unlike all the F2P that are bitching and moaning. Difference is I'm not a retard and I know that there is no way this game can make more than 8 hours of content every 6 weeks, ESPICIALLY considering 3.0 is right around the corner and they're busting their ass to bring new content, new characters, new setting, the cyberpunk collab, new exploration mechanics, but all you people want to do is bitch about not being able to have 40 hours of content on a mobile gacha title every 6 weeks. These games are not designed to be played the way that you want and they are never goin to. These people would be better off playing MMO's but we all know that the ones bitching cant even afford a monthly subscription for those games let alone by a $70 game and that's why they're mad. I will enjoy the 8 hours of content, do all the story and exploration and events which is probably going to take well over 10 hours if you include the story and then I will happily move on to one of my many other games that I have to play while I wait for them to cook up more content. The people complaining are not real fans of the game or they would understand all this especially with 3.0 around the corner, the collab and Kuro has given us 4 straight patches with amazing content and no filler for story in between any of them.

LegionzGaming

58,803 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr