Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇵🇰🇦🇫 PAKISTAN PUSHES FORWARD AS TALIBAN POSITIONS FALL Both sides are shouting victory - but only one has receipts. New reports say Pakistan’s military is seizing multiple Taliban outposts, including the strategic Topsar Observation Post, in the ongoing border clashes. Islamabad claims 21 enemy positions taken; verifiable evidence confirms...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,021,885 subscribers

194,694 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨🚨🚨#ISPR Rawalpindi, 12 Oct 2025 On the night of 11/12 Oct 2025, Afghan Taliban and Indian-sponsored Fitna al Khawarij launched an unprovoked attack on #Pakistan, along Pak -#Afghanistan border. The cowardly action, which included fire and few physical raids, was aimed at destabilising the border areas to facilitate terrorism, furthering FAK's nefarious designs. Exercising the right of self-defence, the alert Armed Forces of Pakistan repelled the assault decisively all along the border and inflicted heavy casualties on Taliban Forces and affiliated Khwarjis. Precision fires and strikes, as well as physical raids were directed against Taliban camps and posts, terrorist training facilities and support networks operating from Afghan territory, including elements linked to Fitna al Khwarij (FAK), Fitna al Hindustan (FAH) and ISKP/ Daesh. All possible measures were taken to avoid collateral damage and to protect civilian lives. As a result of these unrelenting operations, multiple Taliban locations were destroyed all along the border; twenty-one (21) hostile positions on the Afghan side of border were also briefly physically captured and multiple terrorist training camps, used to plan and facilitate attacks against Pakistan, were rendered inoperative. During overnight skirmishes, twenty-three (23) brave sons of Pakistan embraced shahadat while defending territorial integrity of our beloved country against this outrageous action while twenty-nine (29) soldiers are injured. According to credible intelligence estimates and damage assessment, more than two-hundred (200) Taliban and affiliated terrorists have been neutralized while the number of injured is much higher. The infra-structural damages to Taliban posts, camps, Headquarters and support networks of terrorists are extensive, all along the border and range from tactical to operational depth. The Armed Forces of Pakistan remain ever ready to protect the territorial integrity, life and property of the people of Pakistan. Our resolve to defend Pakistan's territorial integrity and to defeat those who threaten our security is unwavering. While the people of Pakistan prefer constructive diplomacy and dialogue over violence and belligerence, we will not tolerate the treacherous use of Afghan soil for terrorism against Pakistan. We have noted with concern that this serious provocation has occurred during the visit of Taliban Foreign Minister to India - the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the region. In the interest of regional peace and security, we call upon the Taliban Government to take immediate and verifiable actions to neutralize the terrorist groups, inter alia, FAK, FAH and ISKP/ Daesh operating from their territory. Otherwise, Pakistan will continue to exercise its right to defend its people by persistent neutralization of terror targets. The Taliban Government should shun any ill-begotten notions and prioritize well being, peace, prosperity and development of Afghan people over irresponsible sabre-rattling. Last night's episode vindicates Pakistan's long-standing position that the Taliban Government is actively facilitating the terrorists. If the Taliban Government continues to sponsor terrorist outfits, in cohorts with India, for shortsighted objective of destabilizing the region, the people and the state of Pakistan will not rest until the menace of terrorism emanating from Afghanistan is completely eliminated.
7:43

🚨🚨🚨#ISPR Rawalpindi, 12 Oct 2025 On the night of 11/12 Oct 2025, Afghan Taliban and Indian-sponsored Fitna al Khawarij launched an unprovoked attack on #Pakistan, along Pak -#Afghanistan border. The cowardly action, which included fire and few physical raids, was aimed at destabilising the border areas to facilitate terrorism, furthering FAK's nefarious designs. Exercising the right of self-defence, the alert Armed Forces of Pakistan repelled the assault decisively all along the border and inflicted heavy casualties on Taliban Forces and affiliated Khwarjis. Precision fires and strikes, as well as physical raids were directed against Taliban camps and posts, terrorist training facilities and support networks operating from Afghan territory, including elements linked to Fitna al Khwarij (FAK), Fitna al Hindustan (FAH) and ISKP/ Daesh. All possible measures were taken to avoid collateral damage and to protect civilian lives. As a result of these unrelenting operations, multiple Taliban locations were destroyed all along the border; twenty-one (21) hostile positions on the Afghan side of border were also briefly physically captured and multiple terrorist training camps, used to plan and facilitate attacks against Pakistan, were rendered inoperative. During overnight skirmishes, twenty-three (23) brave sons of Pakistan embraced shahadat while defending territorial integrity of our beloved country against this outrageous action while twenty-nine (29) soldiers are injured. According to credible intelligence estimates and damage assessment, more than two-hundred (200) Taliban and affiliated terrorists have been neutralized while the number of injured is much higher. The infra-structural damages to Taliban posts, camps, Headquarters and support networks of terrorists are extensive, all along the border and range from tactical to operational depth. The Armed Forces of Pakistan remain ever ready to protect the territorial integrity, life and property of the people of Pakistan. Our resolve to defend Pakistan's territorial integrity and to defeat those who threaten our security is unwavering. While the people of Pakistan prefer constructive diplomacy and dialogue over violence and belligerence, we will not tolerate the treacherous use of Afghan soil for terrorism against Pakistan. We have noted with concern that this serious provocation has occurred during the visit of Taliban Foreign Minister to India - the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the region. In the interest of regional peace and security, we call upon the Taliban Government to take immediate and verifiable actions to neutralize the terrorist groups, inter alia, FAK, FAH and ISKP/ Daesh operating from their territory. Otherwise, Pakistan will continue to exercise its right to defend its people by persistent neutralization of terror targets. The Taliban Government should shun any ill-begotten notions and prioritize well being, peace, prosperity and development of Afghan people over irresponsible sabre-rattling. Last night's episode vindicates Pakistan's long-standing position that the Taliban Government is actively facilitating the terrorists. If the Taliban Government continues to sponsor terrorist outfits, in cohorts with India, for shortsighted objective of destabilizing the region, the people and the state of Pakistan will not rest until the menace of terrorism emanating from Afghanistan is completely eliminated.

Pakistan Armed Forces News 🇵🇰

35,762 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Old “veritable arm” amputated. A new one taking shape? That phrase dates back to 2011, when Mike Mullen told the US Senate that the Haqqani Network functioned as a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, a remark that echoed through two decades of debate about the role of GHQ Rawalpindi in the Afghan conflict. Fast forward to today, and the irony is hard to miss. Last week, Sirajuddin Haqqani warned that Afghanistan would defend itself against Pakistani cross-durand strikes, accusing Islamabad of bombing civilian areas in Behsud and Khas Kunar, including Gardi Kas village and the Hijrat Abad refugee camp. Days later, another striking development: Haji Mali Khan, the deputy chief of staff of the Taliban army and Siraj Haqqani’s uncle reportedly appeared on the front line and targeted a Pakistani border forces outpost with an anti-armour rocket launcher. If confirmed, it would mark the first time a senior Taliban official has openly surfaced in frontline action against Pakistan. Which raises an uncomfortable question. If the Haqqani network was once a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s security apparatus, what are we witnessing now? Has that arm been amputated or simply turned? And if so, what new “arms” might be quietly taking shape in the laboratories of Rawalpindi’s security establishment? History offers a sobering lesson: proxies are rarely obedient forever. They mutate, fragment, and eventually follow their own logic. The tragedy, as always, is that the fire being played with is not abstract strategy, it burns villages, and ordinary people. And once that fire spreads, it rarely stays within the lines drawn in Rawalpindi.
3:04

Old “veritable arm” amputated. A new one taking shape? That phrase dates back to 2011, when Mike Mullen told the US Senate that the Haqqani Network functioned as a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, a remark that echoed through two decades of debate about the role of GHQ Rawalpindi in the Afghan conflict. Fast forward to today, and the irony is hard to miss. Last week, Sirajuddin Haqqani warned that Afghanistan would defend itself against Pakistani cross-durand strikes, accusing Islamabad of bombing civilian areas in Behsud and Khas Kunar, including Gardi Kas village and the Hijrat Abad refugee camp. Days later, another striking development: Haji Mali Khan, the deputy chief of staff of the Taliban army and Siraj Haqqani’s uncle reportedly appeared on the front line and targeted a Pakistani border forces outpost with an anti-armour rocket launcher. If confirmed, it would mark the first time a senior Taliban official has openly surfaced in frontline action against Pakistan. Which raises an uncomfortable question. If the Haqqani network was once a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s security apparatus, what are we witnessing now? Has that arm been amputated or simply turned? And if so, what new “arms” might be quietly taking shape in the laboratories of Rawalpindi’s security establishment? History offers a sobering lesson: proxies are rarely obedient forever. They mutate, fragment, and eventually follow their own logic. The tragedy, as always, is that the fire being played with is not abstract strategy, it burns villages, and ordinary people. And once that fire spreads, it rarely stays within the lines drawn in Rawalpindi.

BILAL SARWARY

20,875 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

//The Wire//1300Z February 27, 2026// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: FINAL PREPARATIONS BEGIN FOR COMBAT OPERATIONS IN MIDDLE EAST. US MILITARY SHOOTS DOWN BORDER PATROL DRONE IN FRIENDLY FIRE INCIDENT. CONFLICT FLARES UP AGAIN BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND AFGHANISTAN.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Middle East: As of this morning, Chinese satellite imagery indicates that Al-Udeid Airbase has been fully evacuated of tanker aircraft, with only a small number of other airframes remaining at this location. The *FORD* CSG has arrived on station off the coast of Israel, and most of the movement of fighter aircraft has slowed to a crawl, as all of the aircraft that have been forward-deployed throughout the region are in their final staging areas, awaiting the launch of the operation. Western Asia: Border clashes between the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan have flared up again, as intense fighting has been reported along the border in the east. Pakistani forces have bombed a few ammo dumps in the Afghan district in Nangarhar, with Taliban forces responding in kind by shooting at Pakistani observation posts along the border. Taliban forces have also claimed to have conducted drone strikes of their own, with improvised explosive drones being used to target several Pakistani military installations overnight. -HomeFront- Texas: Yesterday evening a friendly-fire shootdown incident was reported involving US military forces shooting down a Customs and Border Patrol drone, which was conducting patrols along the southern US border. Analyst Comment: Many details have not been provided on this shootdown incident just yet, however it looks like a CBP drone was operating along the border in the vicinity of Fort Hancock, and due to a lack of deconfliction measures they shot down one of their own drones using a laser-based defense system similar to the system that was being used in El Paso last week. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: In the Middle East, so far everything is lining up for the next potential strike window to open up sometime this weekend, with weather conditions throughout Iran being favorable for most military operations. Lunar illumination is good, and there are no cloud ceilings throughout the nation for the next few days. This morning diplomatic efforts to draw down forces throughout the region continue as well. American Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee sent an email to staffers at the Embassy this morning, telling them that departure is authorized, and that anyone who wants to leave "should do so today". This timeline lines up with the American tradition of conducting strikes after the stock markets close on Friday, though as to the exact hour of the operation beginning, it's anyone's guess. More broadly, we're now in the most optimal targeting window, and this window will be open for the next few days. Analyst: S2A1 Research: Disclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report. //END REPORT//
2:26

//The Wire//1300Z February 27, 2026// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: FINAL PREPARATIONS BEGIN FOR COMBAT OPERATIONS IN MIDDLE EAST. US MILITARY SHOOTS DOWN BORDER PATROL DRONE IN FRIENDLY FIRE INCIDENT. CONFLICT FLARES UP AGAIN BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND AFGHANISTAN.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Middle East: As of this morning, Chinese satellite imagery indicates that Al-Udeid Airbase has been fully evacuated of tanker aircraft, with only a small number of other airframes remaining at this location. The *FORD* CSG has arrived on station off the coast of Israel, and most of the movement of fighter aircraft has slowed to a crawl, as all of the aircraft that have been forward-deployed throughout the region are in their final staging areas, awaiting the launch of the operation. Western Asia: Border clashes between the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan have flared up again, as intense fighting has been reported along the border in the east. Pakistani forces have bombed a few ammo dumps in the Afghan district in Nangarhar, with Taliban forces responding in kind by shooting at Pakistani observation posts along the border. Taliban forces have also claimed to have conducted drone strikes of their own, with improvised explosive drones being used to target several Pakistani military installations overnight. -HomeFront- Texas: Yesterday evening a friendly-fire shootdown incident was reported involving US military forces shooting down a Customs and Border Patrol drone, which was conducting patrols along the southern US border. Analyst Comment: Many details have not been provided on this shootdown incident just yet, however it looks like a CBP drone was operating along the border in the vicinity of Fort Hancock, and due to a lack of deconfliction measures they shot down one of their own drones using a laser-based defense system similar to the system that was being used in El Paso last week. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: In the Middle East, so far everything is lining up for the next potential strike window to open up sometime this weekend, with weather conditions throughout Iran being favorable for most military operations. Lunar illumination is good, and there are no cloud ceilings throughout the nation for the next few days. This morning diplomatic efforts to draw down forces throughout the region continue as well. American Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee sent an email to staffers at the Embassy this morning, telling them that departure is authorized, and that anyone who wants to leave "should do so today". This timeline lines up with the American tradition of conducting strikes after the stock markets close on Friday, though as to the exact hour of the operation beginning, it's anyone's guess. More broadly, we're now in the most optimal targeting window, and this window will be open for the next few days. Analyst: S2A1 Research: Disclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report. //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

24,265 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Thailand and Cambodia Slide Toward Full Conflict as Ceasefire Collapses Clashes between Thailand and Cambodia have erupted along their disputed frontier after a predawn firefight on December 8 shattered a U.S. brokered ceasefire and pushed both armies into their heaviest confrontation in years. Thai forces say Cambodian troops moved artillery and rocket units toward contested ground near Ubon Ratchathani before dawn, triggering exchanges of shelling and small arms fire that killed one Thai soldier and wounded eight. Cambodia reported three injured civilians and accused Thailand of launching the first strike. The fighting widened through December 10 along a 40 km stretch of border, with reports of drones, mortars, and Thai F16 strikes on Cambodian positions. Both governments blame each other for breaking the October ceasefire. Thailand says new landmines in contested areas maimed its soldiers in November. Cambodia rejects the allegation and claims Bangkok is using it to justify deeper incursions. At least 10 to 17 people have been killed and more than 500,000 displaced. More than 125,000 have taken shelter inside Thailand, while tens of thousands have fled villages in northern Cambodia. Yes, China effectively backs Cambodia in the standoff. Beijing calls for restraint in public but remains Phnom Penh’s key military and economic partner, supplying rocket systems, artillery, and training used along the border. Chinese investments under the Belt and Road Initiative give Cambodia political cover as Thailand leans on U.S. support. UN officials and ASEAN diplomats have urged immediate de-escalation, though both sides continue reinforcing positions as talks stall.
0:41

Thailand and Cambodia Slide Toward Full Conflict as Ceasefire Collapses Clashes between Thailand and Cambodia have erupted along their disputed frontier after a predawn firefight on December 8 shattered a U.S. brokered ceasefire and pushed both armies into their heaviest confrontation in years. Thai forces say Cambodian troops moved artillery and rocket units toward contested ground near Ubon Ratchathani before dawn, triggering exchanges of shelling and small arms fire that killed one Thai soldier and wounded eight. Cambodia reported three injured civilians and accused Thailand of launching the first strike. The fighting widened through December 10 along a 40 km stretch of border, with reports of drones, mortars, and Thai F16 strikes on Cambodian positions. Both governments blame each other for breaking the October ceasefire. Thailand says new landmines in contested areas maimed its soldiers in November. Cambodia rejects the allegation and claims Bangkok is using it to justify deeper incursions. At least 10 to 17 people have been killed and more than 500,000 displaced. More than 125,000 have taken shelter inside Thailand, while tens of thousands have fled villages in northern Cambodia. Yes, China effectively backs Cambodia in the standoff. Beijing calls for restraint in public but remains Phnom Penh’s key military and economic partner, supplying rocket systems, artillery, and training used along the border. Chinese investments under the Belt and Road Initiative give Cambodia political cover as Thailand leans on U.S. support. UN officials and ASEAN diplomats have urged immediate de-escalation, though both sides continue reinforcing positions as talks stall.

Open Source Intel

27,644 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

There is a fantastic Iranian documentary about the Shia of Parachinar, where the Shia Pashtuns have their villages encircled by Takfiri animals. Except for this footage, the rest was so brutal that I couldn’t post it. A few interesting notes about their situation. The locals said Parachinar was safe and harmonious until the “Arab-Afghan jihad,” when the American agent Zia-ul-Haq settled the “jihadists” there because of its proximity to the Afghan border. Locals accepted these guests as a gesture of goodwill until years later the settlers and the regime started to encircle the villages and commit mass crimes. The same story of the Jewish settlers in Palestine. In the documentary, people said there has been a constant conflict for nearly 20 years, and throughout the documentary they dispatched men to the front lines day and night to defend their land. In one scene, enemy animals took over a Hussainiya, massacred people, and abused an 80-year-old woman, but the mujahideen later liberated those areas. In short, for 20 years their lives have been under constant threat, and most unfortunately they lack electricity or even the most basic state services in their villages. It’s pure poverty. In one of the scenes it showed how the enemy militias had anti-aircraft artillery (using it against other villages), and the possession of such heavy weaponry is a sign that at least some corrupt elements within the Pakistani regime or the Taliban are aiding these Takfiris. Lastly, as I said elsewhere, unlike the Shia of Bahrain and similar to the Shia of Lebanon and Iraq, the Shia of Pakistan are very well organized and somewhat powerful. They are oppressed, but they always fight back and defend themselves against the enemy militants. In one video the brothers, after their prayers, made a prayer for Ayatollah Khamenei and Iran, which shows that the Shia Pashtun brothers there are sympathetic to our global cause. P.S.: The brothers in this footage — their clothing, their weapons, and the mountainous environment — really remind me of the Houthis in Yemen. It’s a really similar vibe.
0:23

There is a fantastic Iranian documentary about the Shia of Parachinar, where the Shia Pashtuns have their villages encircled by Takfiri animals. Except for this footage, the rest was so brutal that I couldn’t post it. A few interesting notes about their situation. The locals said Parachinar was safe and harmonious until the “Arab-Afghan jihad,” when the American agent Zia-ul-Haq settled the “jihadists” there because of its proximity to the Afghan border. Locals accepted these guests as a gesture of goodwill until years later the settlers and the regime started to encircle the villages and commit mass crimes. The same story of the Jewish settlers in Palestine. In the documentary, people said there has been a constant conflict for nearly 20 years, and throughout the documentary they dispatched men to the front lines day and night to defend their land. In one scene, enemy animals took over a Hussainiya, massacred people, and abused an 80-year-old woman, but the mujahideen later liberated those areas. In short, for 20 years their lives have been under constant threat, and most unfortunately they lack electricity or even the most basic state services in their villages. It’s pure poverty. In one of the scenes it showed how the enemy militias had anti-aircraft artillery (using it against other villages), and the possession of such heavy weaponry is a sign that at least some corrupt elements within the Pakistani regime or the Taliban are aiding these Takfiris. Lastly, as I said elsewhere, unlike the Shia of Bahrain and similar to the Shia of Lebanon and Iraq, the Shia of Pakistan are very well organized and somewhat powerful. They are oppressed, but they always fight back and defend themselves against the enemy militants. In one video the brothers, after their prayers, made a prayer for Ayatollah Khamenei and Iran, which shows that the Shia Pashtun brothers there are sympathetic to our global cause. P.S.: The brothers in this footage — their clothing, their weapons, and the mountainous environment — really remind me of the Houthis in Yemen. It’s a really similar vibe.

أَبُو عِرْفَانِ پارسی

42,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 NYC Hosts Pakistan Day Parade — A Slap in the Face to 9/11 Victims On Sunday, Madison Avenue was turned into a sea of green and white — not for America, but for Pakistan: the state that harbored Osama bin Laden in a military garrison city after 9/11. With full NYPD escort, Pakistani flags, political floats, and foreign party banners paraded through the same city that buried thousands when the Twin Towers fell. (The NYPD now hosts its own Muslim and Pakistani officer societies) This wasn’t “cultural pride.” It was foreign political mobilization: ⚠️ APAG boasting of lobbying victories in Albany. ⚠️ APPAC declaring, “Voting is not only our right – it is our power.” ⚠️ PTI importing Pakistan’s political battles onto U.S. soil. And behind the spectacle? A regime built on terror, minority cleansing, and religious persecution: 23% of Pakistan’s population was non-Muslim in 1947. Today? Barely 3%. Christians, Hindus, and even Shia Muslims are lynched, jailed, or forced into conversion under Pakistan’s blasphemy and Sharia laws. The very intelligence services that nurtured the Taliban sheltered bin Laden within sight of their military academy. Twenty-four years after 9/11, New York isn’t just permitting this — it’s endorsing it. 🇺🇸 The city that suffered most has now become a stage for those aligned with America’s enemies. This parade is a betrayal. It dishonors the memory of 9/11, whitewashes Pakistan’s atrocities, and normalizes the ideology that struck us on that day. America must start speaking out and letting their political leaders know this is unacceptable. We must take our grievances to the ballot box!
4:01

🚨 NYC Hosts Pakistan Day Parade — A Slap in the Face to 9/11 Victims On Sunday, Madison Avenue was turned into a sea of green and white — not for America, but for Pakistan: the state that harbored Osama bin Laden in a military garrison city after 9/11. With full NYPD escort, Pakistani flags, political floats, and foreign party banners paraded through the same city that buried thousands when the Twin Towers fell. (The NYPD now hosts its own Muslim and Pakistani officer societies) This wasn’t “cultural pride.” It was foreign political mobilization: ⚠️ APAG boasting of lobbying victories in Albany. ⚠️ APPAC declaring, “Voting is not only our right – it is our power.” ⚠️ PTI importing Pakistan’s political battles onto U.S. soil. And behind the spectacle? A regime built on terror, minority cleansing, and religious persecution: 23% of Pakistan’s population was non-Muslim in 1947. Today? Barely 3%. Christians, Hindus, and even Shia Muslims are lynched, jailed, or forced into conversion under Pakistan’s blasphemy and Sharia laws. The very intelligence services that nurtured the Taliban sheltered bin Laden within sight of their military academy. Twenty-four years after 9/11, New York isn’t just permitting this — it’s endorsing it. 🇺🇸 The city that suffered most has now become a stage for those aligned with America’s enemies. This parade is a betrayal. It dishonors the memory of 9/11, whitewashes Pakistan’s atrocities, and normalizes the ideology that struck us on that day. America must start speaking out and letting their political leaders know this is unacceptable. We must take our grievances to the ballot box!

Amy Mek

119,355 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here’s the real deal when it comes to the drone situation. In my observation , yes, there are drones that are flying around military installations. We know that to be true with: • Langley • Lakenheath • Vandenberg • Wright-Patterson • Ramstein These are just to name a few that have been recognized as actual drone incursions, at least one of which has led to an arrest (Chinese National arrested as he boarded a flight to China after caught flying drone over Vandenberg) Post ( But then New Jersey happened. While there were reports of drone sightings over two military bases in New Jersey, it’s not uncommon. A Joint Staff spokesperson commented “we have had confirmed sightings at Picatinny Arsenal and Naval Weapons Station Earle," the spokesperson said. "This is not a new issue for us. We've had to deal with drone incursions over our bases for quite a time now. It's something that we routinely respond to in each and every case when reporting is cited." - article ( But the real problem stemmed from social media and the constant misinformation people post for engagement. To get the “viral video” or post. Hysteria from unvetted posts of people claiming that commercial planes were massive drones flying in the night sky drove the mass hysteria. There were even news agencies claiming those videos shows “drones” when they were clearly manned aircraft/planes. This hysteria spread throughout social media, getting millions of impressions per post here on X alone. Imagine the other social media platforms letting these sensationalized videos go unchecked. In an interview with Wolf Blitzer, Secretary Mayorkas reveals that the Homeland Security has not only confirmed that there are no threats present in current drone hysteria in New Jersey, but that there were a lot of reports of people misidentifying planes as drones. ( To add to the hysteria, politicians were claiming adversarial countries had carriers with “drone motherships” parked off of the coast. While the technology does exist, the Biden administration stated that the claim was inaccurate, amongst other sources. Again, the tech is real via Iran & China, but the boat likely was not parked off the coast, causing drone issues in NJ ( With the breaking news this weekend of the airspace over Wright-Patterson being shutdown Friday night, the speculation is still growing. But this should show that this is a multifaceted issue that doesn’t have one resolution or culprit. We do, however, know for certain it’s not aliens or UAP. To conclude, misidentifications, adversarial, hobbyist, copycats, hysteria, misinformation, and politics are all being lumped into an issue that has one common denominator: DRONES. Note: if you want to stay up to date with the drone issue, follow Tyler Rogoway & TWZ as they’ve been breaking all of these stories before anyone else.
5:54

Here’s the real deal when it comes to the drone situation. In my observation , yes, there are drones that are flying around military installations. We know that to be true with: • Langley • Lakenheath • Vandenberg • Wright-Patterson • Ramstein These are just to name a few that have been recognized as actual drone incursions, at least one of which has led to an arrest (Chinese National arrested as he boarded a flight to China after caught flying drone over Vandenberg) Post ( But then New Jersey happened. While there were reports of drone sightings over two military bases in New Jersey, it’s not uncommon. A Joint Staff spokesperson commented “we have had confirmed sightings at Picatinny Arsenal and Naval Weapons Station Earle," the spokesperson said. "This is not a new issue for us. We've had to deal with drone incursions over our bases for quite a time now. It's something that we routinely respond to in each and every case when reporting is cited." - article ( But the real problem stemmed from social media and the constant misinformation people post for engagement. To get the “viral video” or post. Hysteria from unvetted posts of people claiming that commercial planes were massive drones flying in the night sky drove the mass hysteria. There were even news agencies claiming those videos shows “drones” when they were clearly manned aircraft/planes. This hysteria spread throughout social media, getting millions of impressions per post here on X alone. Imagine the other social media platforms letting these sensationalized videos go unchecked. In an interview with Wolf Blitzer, Secretary Mayorkas reveals that the Homeland Security has not only confirmed that there are no threats present in current drone hysteria in New Jersey, but that there were a lot of reports of people misidentifying planes as drones. ( To add to the hysteria, politicians were claiming adversarial countries had carriers with “drone motherships” parked off of the coast. While the technology does exist, the Biden administration stated that the claim was inaccurate, amongst other sources. Again, the tech is real via Iran & China, but the boat likely was not parked off the coast, causing drone issues in NJ ( With the breaking news this weekend of the airspace over Wright-Patterson being shutdown Friday night, the speculation is still growing. But this should show that this is a multifaceted issue that doesn’t have one resolution or culprit. We do, however, know for certain it’s not aliens or UAP. To conclude, misidentifications, adversarial, hobbyist, copycats, hysteria, misinformation, and politics are all being lumped into an issue that has one common denominator: DRONES. Note: if you want to stay up to date with the drone issue, follow Tyler Rogoway & TWZ as they’ve been breaking all of these stories before anyone else.

The Paranormal Chris

53,473 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

(2/2 )Mapping reflects time, space, intent - #Storytelling Another aspect often overlooked is that mapping is inherently also a function of both time and intent. A map is not a neutral object; it tells a story. Depending on what the map aims to convey, the criteria used to depict control may legitimately differ, and the visual elements applied to cartography adapted. If the objective is to represent tactical dynamics with high temporal resolution: how often objectives change hands, the pace of counterattacks, then it is coherent to assign control as soon as it is demonstrated on the ground and to revise it when new geolocated evidence shows a reversal. If, instead, the intent is to present a clear and stable line of contact at a given moment, then a more conservative approach is justified, delaying changes until uncertainty has largely dissipated. Neither approach alters the doctrinal definition of the grey zone. Let us apply those rules to a recently much debated situation: the village of #Ternuvate in the Zaporijia direction, depicted in the maps below. Geolocated footage emerged in January showing Russian soldiers raising flags at multiple locations in the village, as well as in Kosivtseve to the south and further behind the Haichur river toward Huliailpole. A doctrinal depiction would therefore show the village itself as a grey zone, since Ukrainian positions may still contest freedom of operations there. By contrast, the fields south up to the previous Russian FLOT should be marked as "controlled”, since no Ukranian positions capable to deny movement remained in this open areas, enabling forward assault groups to advance. As per the purple area, it should be marked as a no man’s land, as the AFU abandoned positions east of the river long ago, precisely for this purpose: creating an empty pocket in the open fields, mined, with sensors, designed to detect any advance and target it rapidly with drone and artillery fire. This interpretation is consistent with the artillery strikes visible in the area on Clement Molin’s map (map 2), and with videos of Russian units seen progressing through it. It is also important to point out that soldiers raising flags are not #DRG (Deep Reconnaissance Groups), but forward assault groups. By definition, DRG do not reveal their positions to raise flags; but operate way behind enemy lines, for sabotage, targeting or mapping of enemy positions. In this instance at Ternuvate and the other villages the AFU had scarce positions able to stop progress, which were overrun by the small Russian units and drones. The extensive targeting of hideouts, and last mile logistics by Russian drones in recent months aims explicitly at weakening forward positions to support small assault tactics. The recent successful Ukrainian counter attacks (blue arrows in map 1) will likely restore control to the villages. The fact armored columns were used and immediately targeted by Russian drones in those attempts is itself an indicator the area outside the village was under Russian control, while the village itself was contested. When the grey zone properly applies The grey zone itself should therefore be reserved for very specific situations: areas of genuinely unclear control where both sides are visibly operating. Kupyansk city is a relevant example, as conflicting footage shows activity by both sides in different sectors. The same applies to Kostyantynivka, where multiple Russian forward assault detachments have been geolocated recently, indicating that the southern part of the city and central areas should be mapped as a grey zone. By contrast, open fields between positions are rarely, if ever, grey zones and should not be mapped as such. Treating every exposed area as contested dilutes the concept and reduces analytical clarity, especially because bypassed isolated positions, with a couple of soldiers in hiding who could not evacuate on time, do not equate to the ability to operate and negate control. On mapping methodologies and criticism Criticism directed at some mappers for rarely employing grey zones is therefore unfounded. Their practice of assigning control when one side is the only actor operating in an area is doctrinally sound, especially if it wants to show the most forward advances in a dynamic way. That said, caution is always necessary. Flag-raising footage can be staged, manipulated, or misdated, as seen in Pokrovsk with Skala’s photoshopped and recycled imagery. Likewise, single-man infiltrations do not necessarily constitute meaningful control if they are behind clearly established enemy lines. In this respect, DeepState was justified in keeping the northern part of Pokrovsk classified as grey zone for longer. DeepState’s approach is itself valid, as it aims to provide a high degree of certainty about the situation at a given moment. However, its political alignment sometimes results in entire areas being excluded from mapping, which can delay the acknowledgment of advances. Kostyantynivka again illustrates this tendency: while the city should be depicted as a grey zone, much of the southern suburbs and adjacent fields should already be shown as Russian-controlled, given the prolonged absence of active Ukrainian units there. Conclusion In conclusion, control is about maintaining physical influence sufficient to deny meaningful enemy use of an area. It is not about supply stability, drone threats, or immunity from fires. The grey zone is an abstract concept intended to describe specific contested environments, primarily urban or complex terrain, and it should be applied sparingly. Overusing it does not make a map more cautious or more accurate, on the contrary, it risks weakening the story the map is meant to tell
3:24

(2/2 )Mapping reflects time, space, intent - #Storytelling Another aspect often overlooked is that mapping is inherently also a function of both time and intent. A map is not a neutral object; it tells a story. Depending on what the map aims to convey, the criteria used to depict control may legitimately differ, and the visual elements applied to cartography adapted. If the objective is to represent tactical dynamics with high temporal resolution: how often objectives change hands, the pace of counterattacks, then it is coherent to assign control as soon as it is demonstrated on the ground and to revise it when new geolocated evidence shows a reversal. If, instead, the intent is to present a clear and stable line of contact at a given moment, then a more conservative approach is justified, delaying changes until uncertainty has largely dissipated. Neither approach alters the doctrinal definition of the grey zone. Let us apply those rules to a recently much debated situation: the village of #Ternuvate in the Zaporijia direction, depicted in the maps below. Geolocated footage emerged in January showing Russian soldiers raising flags at multiple locations in the village, as well as in Kosivtseve to the south and further behind the Haichur river toward Huliailpole. A doctrinal depiction would therefore show the village itself as a grey zone, since Ukrainian positions may still contest freedom of operations there. By contrast, the fields south up to the previous Russian FLOT should be marked as "controlled”, since no Ukranian positions capable to deny movement remained in this open areas, enabling forward assault groups to advance. As per the purple area, it should be marked as a no man’s land, as the AFU abandoned positions east of the river long ago, precisely for this purpose: creating an empty pocket in the open fields, mined, with sensors, designed to detect any advance and target it rapidly with drone and artillery fire. This interpretation is consistent with the artillery strikes visible in the area on Clement Molin’s map (map 2), and with videos of Russian units seen progressing through it. It is also important to point out that soldiers raising flags are not #DRG (Deep Reconnaissance Groups), but forward assault groups. By definition, DRG do not reveal their positions to raise flags; but operate way behind enemy lines, for sabotage, targeting or mapping of enemy positions. In this instance at Ternuvate and the other villages the AFU had scarce positions able to stop progress, which were overrun by the small Russian units and drones. The extensive targeting of hideouts, and last mile logistics by Russian drones in recent months aims explicitly at weakening forward positions to support small assault tactics. The recent successful Ukrainian counter attacks (blue arrows in map 1) will likely restore control to the villages. The fact armored columns were used and immediately targeted by Russian drones in those attempts is itself an indicator the area outside the village was under Russian control, while the village itself was contested. When the grey zone properly applies The grey zone itself should therefore be reserved for very specific situations: areas of genuinely unclear control where both sides are visibly operating. Kupyansk city is a relevant example, as conflicting footage shows activity by both sides in different sectors. The same applies to Kostyantynivka, where multiple Russian forward assault detachments have been geolocated recently, indicating that the southern part of the city and central areas should be mapped as a grey zone. By contrast, open fields between positions are rarely, if ever, grey zones and should not be mapped as such. Treating every exposed area as contested dilutes the concept and reduces analytical clarity, especially because bypassed isolated positions, with a couple of soldiers in hiding who could not evacuate on time, do not equate to the ability to operate and negate control. On mapping methodologies and criticism Criticism directed at some mappers for rarely employing grey zones is therefore unfounded. Their practice of assigning control when one side is the only actor operating in an area is doctrinally sound, especially if it wants to show the most forward advances in a dynamic way. That said, caution is always necessary. Flag-raising footage can be staged, manipulated, or misdated, as seen in Pokrovsk with Skala’s photoshopped and recycled imagery. Likewise, single-man infiltrations do not necessarily constitute meaningful control if they are behind clearly established enemy lines. In this respect, DeepState was justified in keeping the northern part of Pokrovsk classified as grey zone for longer. DeepState’s approach is itself valid, as it aims to provide a high degree of certainty about the situation at a given moment. However, its political alignment sometimes results in entire areas being excluded from mapping, which can delay the acknowledgment of advances. Kostyantynivka again illustrates this tendency: while the city should be depicted as a grey zone, much of the southern suburbs and adjacent fields should already be shown as Russian-controlled, given the prolonged absence of active Ukrainian units there. Conclusion In conclusion, control is about maintaining physical influence sufficient to deny meaningful enemy use of an area. It is not about supply stability, drone threats, or immunity from fires. The grey zone is an abstract concept intended to describe specific contested environments, primarily urban or complex terrain, and it should be applied sparingly. Overusing it does not make a map more cautious or more accurate, on the contrary, it risks weakening the story the map is meant to tell

Delwin | Military Theorist

11,421 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Analysis: What Pakistan claimed was a downed Indian UAV was, in fact, a Pakistani AWACS/ELINT aircraft 🇵🇰 destroyed by India’s S-400 🇮🇳, at a record-breaking range. 1) On 7–8 May, Pakistani authorities admitted that an object had crashed near Jhand Village, Dinga (Gujrat). Their media and officials quickly framed it as the downing of an Indian UAV. But the facts don’t add up 👇 2) Crash-site visual analysis shows: • Flame height: 8–12 m • Fire footprint: 1,500–2,500 m² Such intensity = an aviation fuel pool fire, indicating thousands of liters of jet fuel which can only be carried by a large aircraft. A small UAV typically carries only 200–500 L, which cannot generate this scale or duration of fire. 3) Reports also confirmed S-400 missile debris recovered in the region. Long range SAMs are not usually fired at small UAVs. This strongly suggests the target was a high-value, large aircraft, not a drone. 4) Pakistan routinely parades captured Indian wreckage. But this time, despite loud claims, no debris from the crash site was ever shown. The “UAV” story was pushed, but never backed with physical evidence. 5) A notable silence: Pakistan loves to present aircraft tallies after conflicts. This time, they avoided it. They could have easily countered claims by displaying their AWACS/ELINT fleet on parade, but they did not. Nor did they present a fighter jet tally. Open-source evidence indicates Pakistan lost at least six aircraft in the air and several more on the ground: • UAVs at Sukkur • AWACS & other aircraft at Bholari • F-16s in Jacobabad 6) Assessment: • Crash admitted by Pakistan • False UAV cover story • S-400 fragments recovered in same region • Visual evidence from site proving a large jet • Unusual silence on fleet strength
0:25

Analysis: What Pakistan claimed was a downed Indian UAV was, in fact, a Pakistani AWACS/ELINT aircraft 🇵🇰 destroyed by India’s S-400 🇮🇳, at a record-breaking range. 1) On 7–8 May, Pakistani authorities admitted that an object had crashed near Jhand Village, Dinga (Gujrat). Their media and officials quickly framed it as the downing of an Indian UAV. But the facts don’t add up 👇 2) Crash-site visual analysis shows: • Flame height: 8–12 m • Fire footprint: 1,500–2,500 m² Such intensity = an aviation fuel pool fire, indicating thousands of liters of jet fuel which can only be carried by a large aircraft. A small UAV typically carries only 200–500 L, which cannot generate this scale or duration of fire. 3) Reports also confirmed S-400 missile debris recovered in the region. Long range SAMs are not usually fired at small UAVs. This strongly suggests the target was a high-value, large aircraft, not a drone. 4) Pakistan routinely parades captured Indian wreckage. But this time, despite loud claims, no debris from the crash site was ever shown. The “UAV” story was pushed, but never backed with physical evidence. 5) A notable silence: Pakistan loves to present aircraft tallies after conflicts. This time, they avoided it. They could have easily countered claims by displaying their AWACS/ELINT fleet on parade, but they did not. Nor did they present a fighter jet tally. Open-source evidence indicates Pakistan lost at least six aircraft in the air and several more on the ground: • UAVs at Sukkur • AWACS & other aircraft at Bholari • F-16s in Jacobabad 6) Assessment: • Crash admitted by Pakistan • False UAV cover story • S-400 fragments recovered in same region • Visual evidence from site proving a large jet • Unusual silence on fleet strength

Defence Core

35,853 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The freestyle visits of Pakistani generals and members of the terrorist group, Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT), to Dhaka amid its ongoing military tension with India and boiling hatred against Hindus in Bangladesh have exposed a deep-rooted conspiracy. While it is well-known that Pakistan’s LeT and Jama’at-ut-Dawa operatives played a key role in the 2024 jihadist-army coup that toppled the Awami League government, the visit of Ibtisam Elahi Zaheer, the closest aide of LeT chief Hafiz Saeed, is considered dangerous both for Bangladesh and India, as he visited some areas near India’s eastern frontier. Zaheer’s ideological footprint extends beyond LeT, with his Ahl-e-Hadith affiliations providing a veneer of legitimacy to Salafi networks across South Asia. His presence in Bangladesh, coinciding with planned propaganda against India, Hindus and ISKCON followers and a visit by Zakir Naik in late November, underscores a potential convergence of radical voices that could amplify recruitment and propaganda efforts targeting vulnerable border communities. Recently, Hefazat leader Mamunul Haque and his colleagues visited Afghanistan to learn firsthand about the implementation of Shariah law in the war-torn country. Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami also said that they will establish Shariah law once voted to power. Zaheer is the General Secretary of Pakistan’s Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith and a long-time ally of the UN-designated terrorist. He landed in Dhaka on October 25 and has since toured sensitive border districts, delivering inflammatory speeches and networking with local radical elements. After reaching Dhaka, Zaheer addressed the “Shine with Nibras – Annual Cultural Fest 2025” at Krishibid Institution Bangladesh (KIB). This marks his second visit since the interim regime under Muhammad Yunus took office. He was also in Bangladesh for more than a week in February 2025. Zaheer will participate in a huge Islamic Conference in Rajshahi on November 6-7. He is expected to stay in the country for more than 12 days. Since August last year, the Yunus gang has been working closely with Pakistan’s ISI to weaken the Bangladesh Army and destabilise the Seven Sisters using the jihadists of LeT, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Taliban and Ansar al-Islam, and some former and serving army personnel. With the fall of the secular government and Dhaka now leaning toward Pakistan and China, terror operatives once pushed away now seem welcomed again. Security experts believe that the LeT is reviving its cross-border footprint under the guise of religious outreach. As calls for jihad and “Greater Bangladesh” grow louder in Dhaka, India watches closely, knowing this network has a direct impact on border youth, recruitment, and national security. In Rajshahi, Zaheer was received at the Shah Makhdum Airport by Abdur Rahim, the son of Abdur Razzak bin Yusuf. He is a member of Al Jamia As-Salafiah, an Islamic research institute affiliated with the Bangladesh branch of the country’s Ahl-e-Hadith movement.
0:59

The freestyle visits of Pakistani generals and members of the terrorist group, Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT), to Dhaka amid its ongoing military tension with India and boiling hatred against Hindus in Bangladesh have exposed a deep-rooted conspiracy. While it is well-known that Pakistan’s LeT and Jama’at-ut-Dawa operatives played a key role in the 2024 jihadist-army coup that toppled the Awami League government, the visit of Ibtisam Elahi Zaheer, the closest aide of LeT chief Hafiz Saeed, is considered dangerous both for Bangladesh and India, as he visited some areas near India’s eastern frontier. Zaheer’s ideological footprint extends beyond LeT, with his Ahl-e-Hadith affiliations providing a veneer of legitimacy to Salafi networks across South Asia. His presence in Bangladesh, coinciding with planned propaganda against India, Hindus and ISKCON followers and a visit by Zakir Naik in late November, underscores a potential convergence of radical voices that could amplify recruitment and propaganda efforts targeting vulnerable border communities. Recently, Hefazat leader Mamunul Haque and his colleagues visited Afghanistan to learn firsthand about the implementation of Shariah law in the war-torn country. Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami also said that they will establish Shariah law once voted to power. Zaheer is the General Secretary of Pakistan’s Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith and a long-time ally of the UN-designated terrorist. He landed in Dhaka on October 25 and has since toured sensitive border districts, delivering inflammatory speeches and networking with local radical elements. After reaching Dhaka, Zaheer addressed the “Shine with Nibras – Annual Cultural Fest 2025” at Krishibid Institution Bangladesh (KIB). This marks his second visit since the interim regime under Muhammad Yunus took office. He was also in Bangladesh for more than a week in February 2025. Zaheer will participate in a huge Islamic Conference in Rajshahi on November 6-7. He is expected to stay in the country for more than 12 days. Since August last year, the Yunus gang has been working closely with Pakistan’s ISI to weaken the Bangladesh Army and destabilise the Seven Sisters using the jihadists of LeT, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Taliban and Ansar al-Islam, and some former and serving army personnel. With the fall of the secular government and Dhaka now leaning toward Pakistan and China, terror operatives once pushed away now seem welcomed again. Security experts believe that the LeT is reviving its cross-border footprint under the guise of religious outreach. As calls for jihad and “Greater Bangladesh” grow louder in Dhaka, India watches closely, knowing this network has a direct impact on border youth, recruitment, and national security. In Rajshahi, Zaheer was received at the Shah Makhdum Airport by Abdur Rahim, the son of Abdur Razzak bin Yusuf. He is a member of Al Jamia As-Salafiah, an Islamic research institute affiliated with the Bangladesh branch of the country’s Ahl-e-Hadith movement.

Sahidul Hasan Khokon

18,811 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Trump Says White House Knows What Drones Are As White House, FBI, DHS Insist Nothing Unusual Afoot Plus: Exclusive to Public, the recording of the White House’s drone briefing for angry New Jersey mayors Since November 18th, the military, city mayors, and citizens have been reporting widespread drone flying over military bases in New Jersey and Ohio and over homes in New Jersey and other states. This morning, a reporter asked President-elect Donald Trump about the drones. “The government knows what is happening,” said Trump. “And for some reason they don't want to comment. And I think they'd be better off saying what it is. Our military knows. Our president knows. And for some reason, they want to keep people in suspense. I can't imagine it's the enemy because if it were the enemy, even if they were late, they'd blast it. Something strange is going on.” A few hours later, representatives from the FBI, the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Aviation Administration all said nothing unusual was going on. “These sightings include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones as well, as well as other aircraft, helicopters, and other images including lights mistakenly reported as drones,” said Jennifer Daskal of DHS. The mayors responded angrily. “This has been going on since November 8th,” said Mayor Mark Taylor of Florham Park. “You can say these are small aircraft. You can say these are manned. They're not. So, I think if anyone was to take away from this that, um, the drones aren't flying, they also must believe that the border is closed.” Public obtained the entire conference call between the mayors, the White House, the FBI, DHS, and the FAA, which ran from around p.m. ET today to just before pm ET. One mayor said he had one drone over his house. “This is certainly not normal,” said Mayor Sam Joshi of Edison. “It's an abnormal amount of drones and the sizes of them are just huge. I had two drones that were the size of vehicles. A couple hundred mayors are all waving a flag saying, ‘This is a big deal.’” Said Mayor Taylor, “I just don't want to hear any longer that we don't know where they're coming from because you should know that." Last week, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said, " We have not seen drones penetrate restricted airspace," and Pentagon Spokesman John Kirby said, "There are no reported or confirmed drone sightings in any restricted airspace.” Kirby stressed the point twice. “There has been no evidence of any of this activity in or near restricted spaces. But US officials have officially reported drones at Langley, Edwards, Earle, and many other military and nuclear sites for years, including in New Jersey recently. The New York Post reported that drones flew over Picatinny Arsenal, a sensitive US military installation “that has been helping develop robotic drones that can counter weapons of mass destruction.” On Friday, drones forced the Wright-Patterson Air Force base in Ohio to shut down air traffic. “Most of the New Jersey drone sightings were misidentified,” noted the War Zone, which broke the story, “so it is notable that the ones spotted over Wright-Patterson, as with the other U.S. military installations, were seen by trained observers that are equipped with high-end gear to maintain security and to discriminate between friend and foe.” Some Democrats in Congress joined Trump and the mayors in demanding more information. “The public has a right to know what is flying over their neighborhoods and in their communities,” said Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). “Whether it’s drones or planes, getting people information is important for transparency and national security.” Please subscribe now to support Public’s award-winning investigative journalism and to listen to and read the transcript of the entire conference call between the White House, DHS, FBI, FAA, and the mayors of New Jersey.
4:53

Trump Says White House Knows What Drones Are As White House, FBI, DHS Insist Nothing Unusual Afoot Plus: Exclusive to Public, the recording of the White House’s drone briefing for angry New Jersey mayors Since November 18th, the military, city mayors, and citizens have been reporting widespread drone flying over military bases in New Jersey and Ohio and over homes in New Jersey and other states. This morning, a reporter asked President-elect Donald Trump about the drones. “The government knows what is happening,” said Trump. “And for some reason they don't want to comment. And I think they'd be better off saying what it is. Our military knows. Our president knows. And for some reason, they want to keep people in suspense. I can't imagine it's the enemy because if it were the enemy, even if they were late, they'd blast it. Something strange is going on.” A few hours later, representatives from the FBI, the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Aviation Administration all said nothing unusual was going on. “These sightings include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones as well, as well as other aircraft, helicopters, and other images including lights mistakenly reported as drones,” said Jennifer Daskal of DHS. The mayors responded angrily. “This has been going on since November 8th,” said Mayor Mark Taylor of Florham Park. “You can say these are small aircraft. You can say these are manned. They're not. So, I think if anyone was to take away from this that, um, the drones aren't flying, they also must believe that the border is closed.” Public obtained the entire conference call between the mayors, the White House, the FBI, DHS, and the FAA, which ran from around p.m. ET today to just before pm ET. One mayor said he had one drone over his house. “This is certainly not normal,” said Mayor Sam Joshi of Edison. “It's an abnormal amount of drones and the sizes of them are just huge. I had two drones that were the size of vehicles. A couple hundred mayors are all waving a flag saying, ‘This is a big deal.’” Said Mayor Taylor, “I just don't want to hear any longer that we don't know where they're coming from because you should know that." Last week, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said, " We have not seen drones penetrate restricted airspace," and Pentagon Spokesman John Kirby said, "There are no reported or confirmed drone sightings in any restricted airspace.” Kirby stressed the point twice. “There has been no evidence of any of this activity in or near restricted spaces. But US officials have officially reported drones at Langley, Edwards, Earle, and many other military and nuclear sites for years, including in New Jersey recently. The New York Post reported that drones flew over Picatinny Arsenal, a sensitive US military installation “that has been helping develop robotic drones that can counter weapons of mass destruction.” On Friday, drones forced the Wright-Patterson Air Force base in Ohio to shut down air traffic. “Most of the New Jersey drone sightings were misidentified,” noted the War Zone, which broke the story, “so it is notable that the ones spotted over Wright-Patterson, as with the other U.S. military installations, were seen by trained observers that are equipped with high-end gear to maintain security and to discriminate between friend and foe.” Some Democrats in Congress joined Trump and the mayors in demanding more information. “The public has a right to know what is flying over their neighborhoods and in their communities,” said Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). “Whether it’s drones or planes, getting people information is important for transparency and national security.” Please subscribe now to support Public’s award-winning investigative journalism and to listen to and read the transcript of the entire conference call between the White House, DHS, FBI, FAA, and the mayors of New Jersey.

Michael Shellenberger

358,907 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The CIA, George SOROS, and the BIDEN administration's connections to the NATIONAL GUARD SHOOTER. Why are there Google Trends searches of the shooter that spike hours BEFORE the shooting even happened? Rahmanullah Lakanwal settled in Washington State from Afghanistan through the "World Relief" organization, which receives U.S. taxpayer dollars through USAID. This same NGO works with pro-migration and open border groups that are heavily backed by George Soros, who also backed the transformation of Evangelical churches, which is connected to the housing efforts through the World Relief organization. Rahmanullah Lakanwal is reportedly a former member of the CIA-backed Kandahar Strike Force, based on a leaked ID and John Ratcliffe saying on Fox, that Lakanwal had CIA “partner force” ties in Kandahar from declassified briefings. Google search results for Rahmanullah Lakanwal spiked in the DC area on November 20, which is 6 full days before the attack, and then again multiple times on the morning of the attack. Digging deeper into the background and military experience of the shooter: The Afghan refugee fought in the late days of the U.S. war there as part of a “Zero Unit,” a paramilitary force that worked with the C.I.A. The units were known for their brutality and labeled “death squads” by human rights groups. The suspect, identified by federal officials as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, grew up in a village in the eastern province of Khost. A childhood friend who asked to be identified only as Muhammad because he feared Taliban reprisals said that Mr. Lakanwal had suffered from mental health issues and was disturbed by the casualties his unit had caused. “He would tell me and our friends that their military operations were very tough, their job was very difficult, and they were under a lot of pressure,” Muhammad said. Members of the Zero units were among the thousands of Afghans relocated to the United States under the Biden administration after the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops in August 2021, which allowed the Taliban to retake control of the country. Federal officials said Mr. Lakanwal was part of that program and had resettled with his family in Washington State. “The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including C.I.A., as a member of a partner force in Kandahar,” the C.I.A. director, John Ratcliffe, said in a statement, adding that the accused assailant “should have never been allowed to come here.” An Afghan intelligence officer, speaking anonymously because he wasn’t allowed to comment publicly, confirmed that Mr. Lakanwal had served in Kandahar in one of the Zero Units, which were formally part of the Afghan intelligence service. The units had been trained for nighttime raids targeting suspected Taliban members and were accused by human rights groups of widespread killings of civilians. The intelligence officer said that one of Mr. Lakanwal’s brothers was the deputy commander of the Zero Unit in Kandahar, which was known as 03. Muhammad, Mr. Lakanwal’s childhood friend said he had last seen him a few weeks before the Taliban takeover in 2021, when Mr. Lakanwal came to Khost to marry his second wife. He had started smoking weed, Muhammad said, and ended up divorcing his new wife a few days after the wedding. Muhammed recalled that Mr. Lakanwal told him: “When he saw blood, bodies, and the wounded, he could not tolerate it, and it put a lot of pressure on his mind.” Taliban officials denounced the actions of the Zero Units during the war. “After that, they fled to the United States in search of a better life,” Mr. Badloon said in a social media post. “These traitors still do not let the Afghan people live in peace.” The C.I.A. has denied the allegations of brutality among the units, saying they were the result of Taliban propaganda. The question remains: Was this a terror attack or an inside job?
1:20

The CIA, George SOROS, and the BIDEN administration's connections to the NATIONAL GUARD SHOOTER. Why are there Google Trends searches of the shooter that spike hours BEFORE the shooting even happened? Rahmanullah Lakanwal settled in Washington State from Afghanistan through the "World Relief" organization, which receives U.S. taxpayer dollars through USAID. This same NGO works with pro-migration and open border groups that are heavily backed by George Soros, who also backed the transformation of Evangelical churches, which is connected to the housing efforts through the World Relief organization. Rahmanullah Lakanwal is reportedly a former member of the CIA-backed Kandahar Strike Force, based on a leaked ID and John Ratcliffe saying on Fox, that Lakanwal had CIA “partner force” ties in Kandahar from declassified briefings. Google search results for Rahmanullah Lakanwal spiked in the DC area on November 20, which is 6 full days before the attack, and then again multiple times on the morning of the attack. Digging deeper into the background and military experience of the shooter: The Afghan refugee fought in the late days of the U.S. war there as part of a “Zero Unit,” a paramilitary force that worked with the C.I.A. The units were known for their brutality and labeled “death squads” by human rights groups. The suspect, identified by federal officials as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, grew up in a village in the eastern province of Khost. A childhood friend who asked to be identified only as Muhammad because he feared Taliban reprisals said that Mr. Lakanwal had suffered from mental health issues and was disturbed by the casualties his unit had caused. “He would tell me and our friends that their military operations were very tough, their job was very difficult, and they were under a lot of pressure,” Muhammad said. Members of the Zero units were among the thousands of Afghans relocated to the United States under the Biden administration after the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops in August 2021, which allowed the Taliban to retake control of the country. Federal officials said Mr. Lakanwal was part of that program and had resettled with his family in Washington State. “The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including C.I.A., as a member of a partner force in Kandahar,” the C.I.A. director, John Ratcliffe, said in a statement, adding that the accused assailant “should have never been allowed to come here.” An Afghan intelligence officer, speaking anonymously because he wasn’t allowed to comment publicly, confirmed that Mr. Lakanwal had served in Kandahar in one of the Zero Units, which were formally part of the Afghan intelligence service. The units had been trained for nighttime raids targeting suspected Taliban members and were accused by human rights groups of widespread killings of civilians. The intelligence officer said that one of Mr. Lakanwal’s brothers was the deputy commander of the Zero Unit in Kandahar, which was known as 03. Muhammad, Mr. Lakanwal’s childhood friend said he had last seen him a few weeks before the Taliban takeover in 2021, when Mr. Lakanwal came to Khost to marry his second wife. He had started smoking weed, Muhammad said, and ended up divorcing his new wife a few days after the wedding. Muhammed recalled that Mr. Lakanwal told him: “When he saw blood, bodies, and the wounded, he could not tolerate it, and it put a lot of pressure on his mind.” Taliban officials denounced the actions of the Zero Units during the war. “After that, they fled to the United States in search of a better life,” Mr. Badloon said in a social media post. “These traitors still do not let the Afghan people live in peace.” The C.I.A. has denied the allegations of brutality among the units, saying they were the result of Taliban propaganda. The question remains: Was this a terror attack or an inside job?

The SCIF

183,580 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The thing I love about Brenna Perez is she’s really good at framing her thoughts. As with all wars, there’s a competing narrative and the one takeaway from this excellent articulation of the conversation is this: In war there are always two sides and the reason the rules of war and the Geneva Conventions exist is to protect both civilians and combatants in times of conflict. Hegseth has openly stated that the U.S. has dispensed with these rules in this war because this is about winning. The problem is, once you’ve telegraphed that message to the enemy you have absolved them from following the rules too. So if you are a family member of a U.S. military service member, your own Secretary of war is telling you to accept that if your loved one is captured there will be no requirement for his captors to follow the rules of war in terms of torture and execution. The sinking of an Iranian warship in the Indian Ocean by a U.S. submarine was yet another indication that there are no rules in this conflict, but that works both ways. If Iran decides to set off a dirty bomb in downtown Washington DC, under Hegseth’s rules, all’s fair in love and war. Once your own government blocks the release of a joint threat assessment designed to raise awareness of a threat to the public on American soil for political purposes, your government is failing you BIG TIME To be clear, this is a conflict out of control, Trump is now pushing a narrative that paves the way for the same indiscriminate targeting of any Iranian simply because they are a Muslim and therefore the enemy, this marks the descent into Gaza 2.0 and I fear it’s now where we are heading. 🎥 TikTok -
3:03

The thing I love about Brenna Perez is she’s really good at framing her thoughts. As with all wars, there’s a competing narrative and the one takeaway from this excellent articulation of the conversation is this: In war there are always two sides and the reason the rules of war and the Geneva Conventions exist is to protect both civilians and combatants in times of conflict. Hegseth has openly stated that the U.S. has dispensed with these rules in this war because this is about winning. The problem is, once you’ve telegraphed that message to the enemy you have absolved them from following the rules too. So if you are a family member of a U.S. military service member, your own Secretary of war is telling you to accept that if your loved one is captured there will be no requirement for his captors to follow the rules of war in terms of torture and execution. The sinking of an Iranian warship in the Indian Ocean by a U.S. submarine was yet another indication that there are no rules in this conflict, but that works both ways. If Iran decides to set off a dirty bomb in downtown Washington DC, under Hegseth’s rules, all’s fair in love and war. Once your own government blocks the release of a joint threat assessment designed to raise awareness of a threat to the public on American soil for political purposes, your government is failing you BIG TIME To be clear, this is a conflict out of control, Trump is now pushing a narrative that paves the way for the same indiscriminate targeting of any Iranian simply because they are a Muslim and therefore the enemy, this marks the descent into Gaza 2.0 and I fear it’s now where we are heading. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

14,066 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten