Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Pass the National Constitutional Carry Act.

198,759 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Colorado Mac
Colorado Macvor 6 Monaten

And somehow he is a liberal and a traitor? Make it make sense.

Profilbild von Jason W Hoyt
Jason W Hoytvor 6 Monaten

@RepThomasMassie Why do we have to pass a law to “grant” a right the supreme law of the land already protects? Federal, state, and local actors need to be prosecuted for violating the Constitution!

Profilbild von DocPyro
DocPyrovor 6 Monaten

enforce the 2nd Amendment. uphold and defend the US Constitution or get out of politics.

Profilbild von big Ds FedPoasting Boogaloo
big Ds FedPoasting Boogaloovor 6 Monaten

Heres an idea, ALL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Rescind every one and get us back to the country our founders wanted.

Profilbild von Bryan
Bryanvor 6 Monaten

Perfect.

Profilbild von GUNGᚾIR
GUNGᚾIRvor 6 Monaten

That's not the issue. The issue is when I use the arms to defeat a feral minority who's trying to kill me because I'm White. My state will send me to prison regardless of justification.

Profilbild von CIIWoodworks
CIIWoodworksvor 6 Monaten

Government begging government to not infringe on so called rights. If the government can infringe them, their privileges not rights. You don’t have a right to bear arms if government decides if you can bear them.

Profilbild von Megan Heaton
Megan Heatonvor 6 Monaten

Please share! My rights are being violated in Philadelphia for advocating for Gun Rights and exposing corruption.

Profilbild von Mike Felker
Mike Felkervor 6 Monaten

@RepThomasMassie Article 4 Section 2 The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. We need State governments that once agreed to be part of the union and adhere to the Constitution to follow it.

Profilbild von Mike Honcho
Mike Honchovor 6 Monaten

@ky_statesman The National Constitutional carry is literally the 2A you dumb fucks

Profilbild von Gun Politics in New York
Gun Politics in New Yorkvor 6 Monaten

Talk is cheap. Make a discharge petition on the bill from the floor.

Profilbild von Scott_M
Scott_Mvor 6 Monaten

@KellyLMcCarty Unfortunately National Constitutional Carry Act requires senate 60 vote pass it unless john Thune invokes nuclear option eliminate 60 vote rule Pass it with simple majority

Profilbild von JayMC
JayMCvor 6 Monaten

When do the other 21 states get sued and barred from violating Americans civil rights for violating the incorporation of 2A by requiring permits? @AAGDhillon @HarmeetKDhillon @MajToure @DLoesch @MrColionNoir @TimSullivanX @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @TedNugent @tedcruz @MikeWChip @repmorgan

Profilbild von Michael Smith ♱
Michael Smith ♱vor 6 Monaten

I am a support of both Paul and Massie, but I tire of the titles like, "Honorable". Why are any of you "honorable" just be cause you are servant politicians? The irony is that far too many of you are "dishonorable", because you are elected politicians.

Profilbild von Mike - MarketTradersTV
Mike - MarketTradersTVvor 6 Monaten

I'm with you & @RepThomasMassie on this one! a rare occurrence these days :)

Profilbild von zach schick
zach schickvor 6 Monaten

All laws repugnant to the constitution shall be ignored.... any gun laws you write is invalid as well as 90% of the laws enforced... we live in an occupied nation.

Profilbild von Caleb's Descendant
Caleb's Descendantvor 6 Monaten

First, file a bill to repeal the NFA and the GCA of 1968. Until that is done an a national carry act only means that we have permission from the fed. gov. to carry in every state in the union. U.S. Cs should not have to ask for permission to enjoy a right given by God.

Profilbild von The Sacred Voice of The Source
The Sacred Voice of The Sourcevor 6 Monaten

Which is more likely killed by the government or killed by a stranger? Killed by the government is more likely. You are following laws that are designed to allow them to kill you; when they want because you stand no chance of stopping them. Weapons are demilitarized for this very reason arguing with the government what rights you have when they know your rights and not care is redundancy.

Profilbild von C𝔯𝐘ᵖⓉicŘƗČⓀ
C𝔯𝐘ᵖⓉicŘƗČⓀvor 6 Monaten

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) @RepThomasMassie introduced H.R. 645, the National Constitutional Carry Act. This bill would make permitless carry the law of the land in all 50 states, D.C., and U.S. territories. ⚫️ No more criminal penalties, fees, or barriers for law-abiding Americans who want to carry in public. The Founders didn’t write “shall not be infringed” so we could be disarmed by hostile state bureaucrats when we cross a state line. ⚫️ Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) @BasedMikeLee just introduced the Senate companion - it’s time for Congress to act. ⚫️ The right to keep and bear arms isn’t a privilege - it’s a constitutional guarantee. Support national constitutional carry and tell your reps to back H.R. 645! #2A #ConstitutionalCarry #Massie #ShallNotBeInfringed Link: Contact your representatives:

Profilbild von Lewis Medlock
Lewis Medlockvor 6 Monaten

I agree with Senator Paul 99% of the time but I disagree here. States should have the right to govern themselves, if it’s abortion or gun laws. The people in California should be allowed to govern themselves no matter how stupid they are, but they should not be allowed to govern people in say Alabama, that is for those people who live in Alabama.

Profilbild von Gellin’
Gellin’vor 6 Monaten

I appreciate this effort greatly, but it is an indictment on our great country. We already have a National Constitutional Carry Act. That is..the 2nd Amendment. Thus, we should rightly be putting effort into prosecuting jurisdictions and judges that don’t recognize it rather than writing more legislation.

Profilbild von Dillon Lawrence
Dillon Lawrencevor 6 Monaten

"I have an idea....let's pass a nationwide constitutional carry right before we grant amnesty to a bunch of third worlders that hate us. What could go wrong?"

Profilbild von Robin Thompson
Robin Thompsonvor 6 Monaten

@KellyLMcCarty This is ridiculous! Everybody in my family carries here in Oklahoma, and everybody in this country has the right to do the same! CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE BEING TESTED HERE! ✝️ 🇺🇸

Profilbild von Jason
Jasonvor 6 Monaten

@ky_statesman Massie is essential.

Profilbild von Scott
Scottvor 6 Monaten

Yes. Congress, pass the national carry act & stop infringing on our God given rights to protect ourselves &follow the guarantee of the constitution. Mankind has a propensity to do wrong. That' s why God gave us the wise 10 commandments. Shall not murder, lie, foricate, covet, etc

Profilbild von Call.Me.Boss
Call.Me.Bossvor 6 Monaten

No need. A settled law need not be mentioned "the right of the People to keep and bear arms" now, go after those who violate that contract including ATF

Profilbild von Maxwell Ridge Premium Southern Brand
Maxwell Ridge Premium Southern Brandvor 6 Monaten

we should have the right to carry uninfringed. Free men do not ask permission no?

Profilbild von Ken Evans
Ken Evansvor 6 Monaten

Honest question: What's the point? Passing this "law" would create the impression that a future Congress has the authority to repeal it. That's the whole effing point of having a Constitution.

Profilbild von Eleutheros
Eleutherosvor 6 Monaten

@RepThomasMassie I kind of feel like “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” already does that but by all means get it done.

Profilbild von chigobiker3130
chigobiker3130vor 6 Monaten

Bs free guns to the cartel

Profilbild von Alex Burke
Alex Burkevor 6 Monaten

@ZanderFromNola Seek the proper Remedy for those that ignore The Constitution…

Profilbild von Joe
Joevor 6 Monaten

Pass the SAVE America Act.

Profilbild von Red dragon
Red dragonvor 6 Monaten

@RepThomasMassie Oh no…. If you want to pass a gun bill where every 18 year old can have a concealed weapon… I’ll pass and I am a republican/ independent

Profilbild von OLDGHOST21.2
OLDGHOST21.2vor 5 Monaten

We already have it. Its called the U.S. Constitution. Atop wasting our time and sic the Judicial Branch on law enforcement infringing it. @USMilitia47

Ähnliche Videos

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr