Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

paste this Jev prompt into Claude and let it audit you it installs Jev, studies how you actually work, and shows you exactly where the hours and the money slip away then it rebuilds your whole setup around the leaks it found same $20 subscription and you end up... show more

Mr. Buzzoni

25,607 subscribers

37,335 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Gregor

Gregor8 дней назад

The 'studies how you actually work' claim is the part I'd question. It can only study what you tell it, which is rarely your actual behavior. Did it surface genuine surprises, or mostly confirm what you already suspected?

Фото профиля Manish

Manish8 дней назад

the “audit yourself” part is the real hook. having Jev watch the actual workflow and then rebuild it around the expensive decisions feels way more useful than just telling people to use fewer tokens.

Фото профиля Chen

Chen7 дней назад

wait so it installs itself to audit your work and then charges you the same $20? that's wild.

Фото профиля Isabella Claire | AI Builder

Isabella Claire | AI Builder7 дней назад

How would that save the price? You are just enhancing efficiency & that's the plus.

Фото профиля Argona

Argona8 дней назад

Yeah claude eats a prompt this size and just gets to work

Фото профиля 阿予50烦OK

阿予50烦OK8 дней назад

这玩意儿简直是效率焦虑症的救命稻草

Фото профиля Minglei

Minglei8 дней назад

funny part is the big model can help you figure out where you don’t need the big model. run the workflow first, find the repetitive judgments, move those to Jev. i’ve been seeing exactly this in my agentic RCA experiments. that’s probably where the architecture starts getting interesting.

Фото профиля NO1ennn

NO1ennn8 дней назад

Cooking bro , I go test it

Фото профиля Vipul Kumar Kewat

Vipul Kumar Kewat8 дней назад

Self-auditing your AI workflow could reveal a lot of hidden inefficiencies.

Фото профиля morph

morph8 дней назад

I'll trust your system, gonna find out what it's gonna turn into

Похожие видео

POV: you found the Jev + claude stack for free and already made $3000 of it

POV: you found the Jev + claude stack for free and already made $3000 of it

CyrilXBT

43,446 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Everyone complains that Claude gives bad answers. Anthropic just showed that the model usually isn't the problem. In this 24-minute Prompting 101 workshop, Hannah Morgan and Christian Ryan take a weak prompt and rebuild it step by step: → weak prompt → richer context → sharper instructions → much better output With Opus 4.8, prompt quality matters more than ever. Most people still type one vague sentence and then blame the AI for what comes back. This workshop shows you how to talk to Claude the way it was actually built to be used. Watch it and save yourself hours of trial and error on your next prompt.

Everyone complains that Claude gives bad answers. Anthropic just showed that the model usually isn't the problem. In this 24-minute Prompting 101 workshop, Hannah Morgan and Christian Ryan take a weak prompt and rebuild it step by step: → weak prompt → richer context → sharper instructions → much better output With Opus 4.8, prompt quality matters more than ever. Most people still type one vague sentence and then blame the AI for what comes back. This workshop shows you how to talk to Claude the way it was actually built to be used. Watch it and save yourself hours of trial and error on your next prompt.

mireia.

67,827 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Jev founder, Diogo Almeida, just put out a PDF on building a Jev harness for coding agents the claim: 200x faster, 400x cheaper the model stopped being the bottleneck a while ago. the harness around it is where the cost and the speed actually live five decisions sit on every loop, and only one of them writes code hand this PDF and the article below to your Claude Code or Codex instance and let it rebuild its own setup your agent gets a better harness tonight, and monday looks different than it would have 👇

Jev founder, Diogo Almeida, just put out a PDF on building a Jev harness for coding agents the claim: 200x faster, 400x cheaper the model stopped being the bottleneck a while ago. the harness around it is where the cost and the speed actually live five decisions sit on every loop, and only one of them writes code hand this PDF and the article below to your Claude Code or Codex instance and let it rebuild its own setup your agent gets a better harness tonight, and monday looks different than it would have 👇

Hanako

37,887 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code era. Claude Code is still part of the assistance era - Jev is the next step Jev is x200 faster, x400 cheaper and has 0 hallucination. This is what comes after RLHF" In 17 minutes he explains why every model you use has a human-shaped flaw baked into it and why Jev is better worth more than a $500 Claude Code engineering course watch today, then read how to actually boost yourself x100 with Jev in the post below

Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code era. Claude Code is still part of the assistance era - Jev is the next step Jev is x200 faster, x400 cheaper and has 0 hallucination. This is what comes after RLHF" In 17 minutes he explains why every model you use has a human-shaped flaw baked into it and why Jev is better worth more than a $500 Claude Code engineering course watch today, then read how to actually boost yourself x100 with Jev in the post below

Codez

192,985 просмотров • 19 дней назад

72 hours in and GPT-5.6 Sol is still running without a single follow-up prompt. The task was to build the most comprehensive map possible of the physical infrastructure powering AI, submarine cables, data centers, power plants, substations and electricity grids. The only thing given was a simple loop: → Find the biggest gap → Research it → Build it → Test it → Publish it → Repeat Most people expected this to stall after a few hours. It didn't. The Mac restarted mid-run and Codex picked up exactly where it left off without losing anything. What this actually proves is that the prompt matters less than the goal. The smarter the model, the more room you need to give it to make its own decisions. Constrain it with steps and you get a worse version of what it could do on its own.

72 hours in and GPT-5.6 Sol is still running without a single follow-up prompt. The task was to build the most comprehensive map possible of the physical infrastructure powering AI, submarine cables, data centers, power plants, substations and electricity grids. The only thing given was a simple loop: → Find the biggest gap → Research it → Build it → Test it → Publish it → Repeat Most people expected this to stall after a few hours. It didn't. The Mac restarted mid-run and Codex picked up exactly where it left off without losing anything. What this actually proves is that the prompt matters less than the goal. The smarter the model, the more room you need to give it to make its own decisions. Constrain it with steps and you get a worse version of what it could do on its own.

0xMarioNawfal

61,751 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

most people spend hours describing what they want to Claude Code this guy just browsed a catalog of thousands of animated UI components, found one he liked, and hit "copy prompt" that's it. the prompt goes into Claude Code and it builds it. > 21st(.)dev - a library of community-made components built for React, Next.js, Tailwind > every component has a ready-made prompt attached > you pick the effect, copy, paste, done no describing animations from scratch. no explaining what "smooth scroll" or "hover glow" means. someone already figured out the exact prompt that produces it. gap between people who know this exists and people who don't is measured in hours per project full walkthrough in the article below

most people spend hours describing what they want to Claude Code this guy just browsed a catalog of thousands of animated UI components, found one he liked, and hit "copy prompt" that's it. the prompt goes into Claude Code and it builds it. > 21st(.)dev - a library of community-made components built for React, Next.js, Tailwind > every component has a ready-made prompt attached > you pick the effect, copy, paste, done no describing animations from scratch. no explaining what "smooth scroll" or "hover glow" means. someone already figured out the exact prompt that produces it. gap between people who know this exists and people who don't is measured in hours per project full walkthrough in the article below

monokern

64,484 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Finally, an OpenRouter for agent harnesses! (including System One by Jev) Devs just open-sourced a plug-and-play infrastructure layer that lets you run any harness under a single interface, like: - Codex - Hermes - Claude code - DeepSeek Harness - System One, powered by Jev - And 9 more agent harnesses This means you can bring Jev into the same product that already uses Codex, Claude Code, or another supported harness, without writing another implementation for sessions, streaming, files, cancellation, and failure handling. Here's the repo: (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) The harnesses run locally, and the Unified Harness Protocol (UHP) defines the common task interface with an OpenAI Responses-compatible API. If you want to dive deeper, my recent article explains why model routing is not the same as harness routing, and what it takes to support multiple harnesses. It also covers UHP, the full local setup, a working API call, and how sessions and files work. Read it below.

Finally, an OpenRouter for agent harnesses! (including System One by Jev) Devs just open-sourced a plug-and-play infrastructure layer that lets you run any harness under a single interface, like: - Codex - Hermes - Claude code - DeepSeek Harness - System One, powered by Jev - And 9 more agent harnesses This means you can bring Jev into the same product that already uses Codex, Claude Code, or another supported harness, without writing another implementation for sessions, streaming, files, cancellation, and failure handling. Here's the repo: (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) The harnesses run locally, and the Unified Harness Protocol (UHP) defines the common task interface with an OpenAI Responses-compatible API. If you want to dive deeper, my recent article explains why model routing is not the same as harness routing, and what it takes to support multiple harnesses. It also covers UHP, the full local setup, a working API call, and how sessions and files work. Read it below.

Akshay 🚀

355,545 просмотров • 16 дней назад

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

58,090 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

If AI isn’t giving you what you want, ask it how to ask better. Most people treat ChatGPT like a vending machine. But if you treat it like a collaborator and let it help shape the prompt, the quality of your output jumps fast.

If AI isn’t giving you what you want, ask it how to ask better. Most people treat ChatGPT like a vending machine. But if you treat it like a collaborator and let it help shape the prompt, the quality of your output jumps fast.

Hiten Shah

22,029 просмотров • 1 год назад

The smartass clipboard chrome extension I built with TypeSafe AI Jev is now open source. It reads the text you paste, breaks it into blocks and scans the form to understand what each field is. Jev then matches the right block to each field, verifies it against the original text and pastes only confident matches.

The smartass clipboard chrome extension I built with TypeSafe AI Jev is now open source. It reads the text you paste, breaks it into blocks and scans the form to understand what each field is. Jev then matches the right block to each field, verifies it against the original text and pastes only confident matches.

Noman

30,262 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI): "You don't need to write prompts anymore. You need loops and graphs that write them for you." in 78 minutes he explains how to use LLMs better than almost anyone does Prompts → Agents → Loops → Graphs that is the whole difference between using AI and having AI work for you same model, same tokens, and the only thing that changes is the shape you run it in watch it today, then save the full graph engineering guide below

Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI): "You don't need to write prompts anymore. You need loops and graphs that write them for you." in 78 minutes he explains how to use LLMs better than almost anyone does Prompts → Agents → Loops → Graphs that is the whole difference between using AI and having AI work for you same model, same tokens, and the only thing that changes is the shape you run it in watch it today, then save the full graph engineering guide below

Hanako

289,557 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

If you are confused about why 𝗝𝗲𝘃 is being called the "Internet" moment for the AI industry. This is 100% worth your time. In fact, you should watch it: It tells LLMs what to do next, in milliseconds & at almost zero cost. If you set it up correctly, you will have the AI engineer’s setup for 2028. How to set up & use Jev (to actually get the 100x): 1. Join the waitlist; it's fairly quick: typesafe .ai. 2. Then go to Claude Code or Codex. 3. Choose Opus 5-Low or Sol-Low. 4. Copy and paste this prompt: "[claude or codex] plugin marketplace add typesafe-ai/skills [claude or codex] plugin install typesafe@typesafe-ai" 5. When you type /typesafe, the skill shows up. 6. Paste your API key once and click "Allow" 7. Start with $5 in free credit. It's hard to spend more. ----- Now, here are the 3 ways to actually use Jev: 1. Jev for Linkedin I have 38,000 connections & invitations on LinkedIn. I have a new company to launch. I need to find a couple of hundred people to message. to do while saving time: > Export your LinkedIn connections and invitations. > Connect Claude to GitHub, Vercel & Apify. > Create an Apify API key to enrich your data. > Go to LinkedIn Settings → Data privacy. > Get a copy. LinkedIn will email you a ZIP file. > Open the file & find the Connections CSVs. > Upload the files to Jev. > Use Jev to classify your contacts. > Review the shortlist. 2. Jev for Gmail To go through all of my Gmail contacts and email the right people. > Go to Google Contacts. Open Other contacts. > Select all contacts. Export them. > Upload the file to Claude Code or Codex. > Use Jev to sort them into: Keep, Review, Remove and Review everything before removing anything. 3. You got lost in Claude Code, GitHub, Vercel, Apify, Jev, Typesafe. I feel you. It is overwhelming. That’s why I included the entire copy-and-paste prompt for each use case in the newsletter: A 45-second TL;DR by Matija Sosic.

If you are confused about why 𝗝𝗲𝘃 is being called the "Internet" moment for the AI industry. This is 100% worth your time. In fact, you should watch it: It tells LLMs what to do next, in milliseconds & at almost zero cost. If you set it up correctly, you will have the AI engineer’s setup for 2028. How to set up & use Jev (to actually get the 100x): 1. Join the waitlist; it's fairly quick: typesafe .ai. 2. Then go to Claude Code or Codex. 3. Choose Opus 5-Low or Sol-Low. 4. Copy and paste this prompt: "[claude or codex] plugin marketplace add typesafe-ai/skills [claude or codex] plugin install typesafe@typesafe-ai" 5. When you type /typesafe, the skill shows up. 6. Paste your API key once and click "Allow" 7. Start with $5 in free credit. It's hard to spend more. ----- Now, here are the 3 ways to actually use Jev: 1. Jev for Linkedin I have 38,000 connections & invitations on LinkedIn. I have a new company to launch. I need to find a couple of hundred people to message. to do while saving time: > Export your LinkedIn connections and invitations. > Connect Claude to GitHub, Vercel & Apify. > Create an Apify API key to enrich your data. > Go to LinkedIn Settings → Data privacy. > Get a copy. LinkedIn will email you a ZIP file. > Open the file & find the Connections CSVs. > Upload the files to Jev. > Use Jev to classify your contacts. > Review the shortlist. 2. Jev for Gmail To go through all of my Gmail contacts and email the right people. > Go to Google Contacts. Open Other contacts. > Select all contacts. Export them. > Upload the file to Claude Code or Codex. > Use Jev to sort them into: Keep, Review, Remove and Review everything before removing anything. 3. You got lost in Claude Code, GitHub, Vercel, Apify, Jev, Typesafe. I feel you. It is overwhelming. That’s why I included the entire copy-and-paste prompt for each use case in the newsletter: A 45-second TL;DR by Matija Sosic.

Ruben Hassid

172,145 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Introducing Jev Model Router for Claude Code This Claude Code Mod lets you use Jev through its direct TypeSafe AI API or Vercel AI Gateway With every request you send to Claude Code, Jev classifies the subagent model, main model (only at session start to avoid breaking the cache), and effort level Install it with one command: npx claude-code-templates@latest --mod productivity/jev-model-router Full Mod details:

Introducing Jev Model Router for Claude Code This Claude Code Mod lets you use Jev through its direct TypeSafe AI API or Vercel AI Gateway With every request you send to Claude Code, Jev classifies the subagent model, main model (only at session start to avoid breaking the cache), and effort level Install it with one command: npx claude-code-templates@latest --mod productivity/jev-model-router Full Mod details:

Daniel San

206,776 просмотров • 18 дней назад

i genuinely don't understand why everyone isn't using this yet diogo almeida, one of the people behind chatgpt, spent two years in stealth and shipped this on monday. his own words about it: "jev is off the charts", the same frontier intelligence you're already paying for, "two orders of magnitude faster and more efficient" in normal words: jev is an ai that never writes anything. it only decides. yes or no, which pile does this go in, how good is it. one answer per item, under half a second each, with a number for how sure it is. it isn't writing anything, so it can't make anything up so you stop feeding chatgpt one thing at a time and hand jev the whole pile. 400 unread emails into reply today, later, never. 300 comments into questions, complaints, praise. 200 job posts into worth it and not. a competitor's entire ad library into what's actually working. the whole pile, in seconds, for cents full guide: > join the waitlist on people are approved the same day > open the dashboard and create an api key > tell claude or your agent: install the typesafe skill > paste your pile and name the buckets you want it sorted into > it hands everything back labelled, with a confidence number on each one no code, nothing to learn. someone ran 1,891 ads through it in 19 seconds for 12 cents, and it's free on vercel's gateway right now five minutes to set up, and the sorting job that used to eat your evening is done before you stand up full step-by-step guide, link below bookmark this

i genuinely don't understand why everyone isn't using this yet diogo almeida, one of the people behind chatgpt, spent two years in stealth and shipped this on monday. his own words about it: "jev is off the charts", the same frontier intelligence you're already paying for, "two orders of magnitude faster and more efficient" in normal words: jev is an ai that never writes anything. it only decides. yes or no, which pile does this go in, how good is it. one answer per item, under half a second each, with a number for how sure it is. it isn't writing anything, so it can't make anything up so you stop feeding chatgpt one thing at a time and hand jev the whole pile. 400 unread emails into reply today, later, never. 300 comments into questions, complaints, praise. 200 job posts into worth it and not. a competitor's entire ad library into what's actually working. the whole pile, in seconds, for cents full guide: > join the waitlist on people are approved the same day > open the dashboard and create an api key > tell claude or your agent: install the typesafe skill > paste your pile and name the buckets you want it sorted into > it hands everything back labelled, with a confidence number on each one no code, nothing to learn. someone ran 1,891 ads through it in 19 seconds for 12 cents, and it's free on vercel's gateway right now five minutes to set up, and the sorting job that used to eat your evening is done before you stand up full step-by-step guide, link below bookmark this

Argona

32,613 просмотров • 17 дней назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $4.2M FILE WHERE 4 AGENTS BUILD THE JEV SYSTEM IN 60 MINUTES, DOING $100K A MONTH four agents cost $0, and the system they assemble in an hour generates $100K a month scout → builder → critic → operator → JEV every agent is pinned to one exact model version, and none of them runs on "latest" the scout on Haiku 4.5 reads the market, the builder on Sonnet 5 builds everything, the critic on Opus 5 decides what ships the operator runs Haiku through the batch API at half price - the one agent that never has to hurry the builder takes 59% of the whole hour, because it's the one writing, and writing costs 5x more than reading short answers are cheap answers - and the whole economics rests on that one rule pin the versions in ROOT.md and next month JEV behaves exactly the same point it at "latest" and the model underneath updates quietly, no error, and the answers start to drift $100K a month is 334 customers at $299 four versions, one system - pin them and JEV stays JEV save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 4 agents ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $4.2M FILE WHERE 4 AGENTS BUILD THE JEV SYSTEM IN 60 MINUTES, DOING $100K A MONTH four agents cost $0, and the system they assemble in an hour generates $100K a month scout → builder → critic → operator → JEV every agent is pinned to one exact model version, and none of them runs on "latest" the scout on Haiku 4.5 reads the market, the builder on Sonnet 5 builds everything, the critic on Opus 5 decides what ships the operator runs Haiku through the batch API at half price - the one agent that never has to hurry the builder takes 59% of the whole hour, because it's the one writing, and writing costs 5x more than reading short answers are cheap answers - and the whole economics rests on that one rule pin the versions in ROOT.md and next month JEV behaves exactly the same point it at "latest" and the model underneath updates quietly, no error, and the answers start to drift $100K a month is 334 customers at $299 four versions, one system - pin them and JEV stays JEV save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 4 agents ↓

Sprytix

37,977 просмотров • 16 дней назад

this is f**king dangerous someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in opus 4.8 with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Create a New Claude Project and "Add this .md in Project instructions 3) Use Opus 4.8 High/Max and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/5th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king dangerous someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in opus 4.8 with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Create a New Claude Project and "Add this .md in Project instructions 3) Use Opus 4.8 High/Max and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/5th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

954,663 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Anti-Zionism IS antisemitism. It started as anti-Judaism, morphed into antisemitism and is now being calling anti-Zionism, but these things are the same. 95% of Jews will tell you the same thing. Please don’t tell us otherwise, when we’re the ones being persecuted because of this hate. Stop the BS and call it what it is. And if you actually care, maybe speak up against it for your Jewish brothers and sisters.

Anti-Zionism IS antisemitism. It started as anti-Judaism, morphed into antisemitism and is now being calling anti-Zionism, but these things are the same. 95% of Jews will tell you the same thing. Please don’t tell us otherwise, when we’re the ones being persecuted because of this hate. Stop the BS and call it what it is. And if you actually care, maybe speak up against it for your Jewish brothers and sisters.

James Maslow

16,875 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

1/ Keep running claude -p on your Claude Code subscription after June 15. A 200-line bash wrapper pipes your prompt into the Claude Code session you already have open. The call rides your subscription, not the new Agent SDK credit bucket. Looks like claude -p. Runs on the plan you already pay for. How it works 👇

1/ Keep running claude -p on your Claude Code subscription after June 15. A 200-line bash wrapper pipes your prompt into the Claude Code session you already have open. The call rides your subscription, not the new Agent SDK credit bucket. Looks like claude -p. Runs on the plan you already pay for. How it works 👇

AI Builder Club

27,279 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

Gipp 🦅

14,871 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад