正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Patrick Collison says humanity has never cured a complex disease. Not cancer. Not Alzheimer’s. Not Type 1 diabetes. His Arc Institute is trying something new: Simulate biology with AI. Test interventions before touching the body. Build a virtual cell. Test hypotheses in code. If it works, biology becomes computable.

1,096,216 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

vitrupo 的头像
vitrupo1 年前

Arc Institute co-founder and Stripe CEO Patrick Collison at Hard Fork Live:

Muse Modalities 的头像
Muse Modalities1 年前

All of this absolutely needs cyberspace-native physics⚛

Ant A 的头像
Ant A1 年前

ASI having 100% benchmark saturation in chemistry, biology, physics, engineering, etc. will happen.

Suyash Verma 的头像
Suyash Verma1 年前

Great work!

𝗝 𝟯 𝟯 𝗣 𝟰 | 𝗷𝟯𝟯𝗽𝟰.𝗲𝘁𝗵 的头像
𝗝 𝟯 𝟯 𝗣 𝟰 | 𝗷𝟯𝟯𝗽𝟰.𝗲𝘁𝗵1 年前

Moronic. We test stuff in cells all of the time and they produce amazing results. In mice, lose many. In human studies lose almost all. That’s why it’s hard - we can’t simulate humans. We don’t need to simulate cells. We can already just try stuff at high throughout.

TRUST-AI BY TWC 的头像
TRUST-AI BY TWC1 年前

It could well be that there’s simply more money to be made in “managing” long-term chronic disease than developing actual cures. Never underestimate mankind’s tendency towards inhumanity to maximise self-interest.

Alicorn 的头像
Alicorn1 年前

Telling the truth is hard for some people. IT wasn't hard you just rather invest in wars and black site projects and money systems than to focus on uplifting the very people you farm everyday under the Veil of we just couldn't figure it out.

Erik Espinosa-DeLoges 的头像
Erik Espinosa-DeLoges1 年前

Yes, this was one of the original (futurist) claims--that AGI would be able to run simulations, and run them rapidly, without having to use any human test subjects, or even animals. AGI will also be able to map each persons body/biology, and create specific/detailed resolutions

Sean X. Luo MD PhD 的头像
Sean X. Luo MD PhD1 年前

Completely false. About 30% of stage iv melanoma is now cured. The recent trial of stem cells for DM1 was quite impressive.

Adan Z Becerra, PhD 的头像
Adan Z Becerra, PhD1 年前

Many curative treatments exist for cancer

相关视频

Jennifer Doudna won the Nobel Prize for gene editing and went on Bloomberg to say the chatbots everyone is betting on cannot innovate at all. Every promise Silicon Valley is making about AI curing disease just hit the one person qualified to check it. She has spent her whole career inside the actual frontier of curing disease. So when she talks about what AI can and cannot do in biology, she is not guessing. She is reporting from inside the lab. Her words were blunt. She is not seeing chatbots innovate. They summarize data. They write reports. They do not come up with a brand new idea nobody has ever had. Then the interviewer pushed. So you're saying AI can't innovate? Doudna did not flinch. She does not know if it can't. She just does not see it doing it right now. This lands harder when you remember who is making the opposite case. Sam Altman says AI will eliminate disease within five years. Larry Ellison says AI will cure cancer in a 48 hour window. An OpenAI executive even floated that the company should get a cut of sales on any drug discovered through ChatGPT. Doudna answered that in two words. Good luck. Even the cancer specialists Altman is selling to keep warning that cancer is not one disease but hundreds, each needing its own cure, and that compute does not skip the years of lab work. Her reason is simpler. Biology is hard. You cannot simulate your way to an understanding of the human body. The people promising cures are the ones selling the tool. The person who actually won a Nobel building them is telling you it has not happened yet. Source: Bloomberg Originals Watch the full video on their official channel.

Ihtesham Ali

428,599 次观看 • 20 天前