正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Paul Kagame has sent his Rwandan soldiers to Point Zero again. When the drones arrive, they will call themselves Banyamulenge civilians, but now they are recording themselves happily. Congo will not be at peace as long as Paul Kagame is still in Rwanda. We need to take him down.

16,576 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

#EXPLAINED 𝗞𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗚𝗼𝗺𝗮 𝗯𝘆 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲, "𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗪𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝘁? 𝗔𝗱𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗠𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁." In a revealing and almost unguarded speech, Rwandan President Paul Kagame has essentially admitted what Kinshasa and the international community have long accused him of: holding Goma and eastern Congo hostage to force political concessions from the DRC. During the press Conference today in Kigali, Nov 27 Kagame, speaking in reference to Goma, said: “If I were the one controlling Goma… and you come and say, ‘I want to use Goma,’ I say fine, but these are conditions. Goma is part of my problems with the government, and now it is in my hands. I will not give it to you until you show me how you address my problems.” While Kagame frames this as a hypothetical, the choice of words, “it is in my hands,” strips away the fiction. This is no longer about M23 rebels acting independently. This is Kagame speaking as the occupier. He goes further: “You want Goma, Kavumu, Bukavu, or even the whole of eastern Congo back? Fine. But you must address my problems first.” This is not diplomacy, it’s blackmail through armed occupation. It confirms what Congo has said for years: Kagame uses M23 and direct Rwandan troop deployments to control Congolese territory, not for security, but as leverage to extract political and economic concessions. What this proves: Kagame is admitting territorial control of Goma, a city that has been under de facto M23 occupation since early 2025. He links the return of Congolese territory to Rwanda’s grievances, meaning he considers eastern Congo a bargaining chip. He uses personal pronouns ("my hands", "I will not give it"), revealing direct ownership of the occupation. He reinforces a long pattern: Kagame sees military force as a legitimate tool to resolve political issues. "If you don't give me my rights, then it means they fight. We will fight, no question about it." Paul Kagame, Nov. 2025 What This Means for Congo This speech justifies every single accusation Kinshasa, Muyaya, and Kayikwamba have made: Rwanda is not acting in self-defense; it is occupying Congo militarily. Goma is not under rebel control; it is under Rwandan strategic control. Kagame has no intention of withdrawing unless he gets political rewards, which is blackmail, not peace. No Peace Under Hostage Conditions Tshisekedi is going to Washington not to beg for peace, but to expose Rwanda's regional aggression. Kagame’s own words reveal that he holds Congolese territory to pressure Kinshasa, and is willing to keep fighting if his “problems” aren’t resolved. But let’s be clear What are Kagame’s “problems”? He wants free access to Congo’s minerals, the ability to launder them through Rwandan markets, and he dreams of infiltrating, once again the Congolese army (FARDC) to maintain long-term control. But This time, the Congolese government will not let it happen again. La patrie ou La mort

XTRAfrica Media Group

16,945 次观看 • 9 个月前

#ALERT ⚠️🇨🇩 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗧𝗢 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗘𝗡𝗗 The Truth They’ve Tried to Bury for Decades… Let’s say it clearly: Paul Kagame is not just a Rwandan problem; he is one of Africa’s biggest destabilizers. For decades, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the richest country in the world in natural resources, has been trapped in endless conflict. Why? Because Kagame, backed by certain global powers, has turned eastern Congo into a battlefield for his expansionist ambitions. It didn’t start in Congo. It started with betrayal in Rwanda. In 1994, Paul Kagame’s RPF forces shot down the plane carrying the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi, igniting the genocide. His goal? ➤ To seize power by force, knowing he’d never win democratic elections as a minority Tutsi elite. ➤ And worse, he allowed the genocide to unfold and even sacrificed his own people, the Tutsis, to justify military intervention. These are not conspiracy theories. These are documented facts, even investigated by the International Court of Justice, until the U.S. and France stepped in to shield him. Then Kagame turned to Congo. He installed Laurent-Désiré Kabila, hoping he’d act as a puppet. When Kabila refused to place Rwandan Tutsis in key positions of power, Kagame responded the only way he knows how: War, invasion, and plunder. And the plan was larger: A Tutsi expansionist empire stretching from Rwanda to Congo. A Congo divided into five regions, easier to loot through local proxies. A system designed to rule over Bantu-majority populations using foreign-backed elites. But Congo refused. Kabila turned to SADC, and African nations like Zimbabwe, Angola, Namibia, and South Africa responded. They saw through the plot. They understood that breaking Congo meant breaking Africa. And today, the same Kagame regime arms and protects M23, a proxy militia terrorizing civilians in North Kivu. The same strategy. The same objective. But Congo is awake. Africa is watching. To the Congolese people and all Africans: This is not just about minerals. This is not tribal. This is a battle between those who defend sovereignty and those who sell it to the highest bidder. We must name it: Kagame is the architect of instability in the Great Lakes region. #FreeCongo #StopKagame

Xtrafrica

37,707 次观看 • 9 个月前