Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Payouts processed in under 60 seconds, with proof. Request them on-demand as soon as right after closing a trade, starting at a minimum of $50. → No minimum profitable days → No consistency rule → Every payout is on-demand, not just the first one before a bi-weekly schedule takes...

12,672 просмотров • 23 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The prop firm industry was born to solve a real problem: give skilled traders capital to trade with when they don't have it. (read this to the end, we have something big for you 👇) But somewhere down the road it turned into building a system with rules so tight and absurd that 98% of traders fail, so firms could keep profiting from the challenge fees paid upfront. If you're reading this, don't pretend it never happened to you, or someone you know. Working for days, weeks, sometimes months, just to get a payout denied for the most absurd excuse. The reason that happens is simple: most prop firms simulate your trades, they don't execute them. Your profits are a cost to them. So the whole model is engineered to make you fail. We asked ourselves: if that many payouts are being denied, it means there are more profitable traders out there than the industry wants you to believe. So we took everything wrong with this industry and fixed it. Here's what we built: 1/ Real Market Execution. Instant Payouts. Your trades hit the real market. Not a simulation. You make $100 profit and want to withdraw it immediately? You can. Instantly, with no waiting period, or absurd excuses. Ah, if you were about to ask, there's no daily cap either. 2/ Zero Restrictive Rules at Funded Stage. No daily drawdown, consistency rules, or other absurd ones. Those rules only exist at evaluation stage, to assess whether you can manage risk properly or not. Once funded, they're gone. Trade freely. 3/ A Monthly Salary. Just for Being Funded. ATS Funded is still the only prop firm paying a monthly retainer to its traders. 1% of your account balance, every month, regardless of whether you're up, down, or flat. A bad month means stress, and stress means bad decisions. The salary is there so a bad month doesn't interfere with your strategy. So, what now? If you made it this far, we built this for you, and a gift is waiting in the pinned comment below. Stop trading with your own capital when you can trade with ours. Get Funded 👉 Video Breakdown 👉

FUNDEX

162,304 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

On April 20th 2020, something "impossible" happened: oil futures prices crashed through the floor, settling at MINUS $37.62 a barrel The reason? Because of lockdowns, demand for fuel crashed, oil tanks filled up, and no storage space was left, so those who held oil for delivery had to dump contracts at any price. Important to notice how, in 2020, speculative traders were positioned heavily long on Oil futures under the assumption lockdowns would not have lasted long and demand quickly spiked as soon as they were lifted, propping up the depressed crude oil prices. What would it take for the exact opposite to happen and for oil prices to suddenly skyrocket? Logically speaking, the answer is: SPR, Commercial, and Cushing inventories all at critical lows at the same time while demand remains strong and supply is in deficit. Does anything I said sound familiar? Of course it does, because that's exactly where we are right now. Those who say all-time low SPRs don't matter might be right. Those who say low commercial inventories do not matter might be right. Those who say Cushing hitting tank bottoms do not matter might be right too. Yes, they might be right if you consider these factors in isolation. The problem is that all-time low SPRs, low commercial inventories, Cushing about to hit tank bottoms, while demand remains strong (otherwise monster drawdowns would not happen) ARE ALL HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME. Beware: trading models are always based upon what happened in the past, but they aren't the right tool to try to predict something that never happened for the simple reason they have no data points to be built on. This is the reason why those who just looked at their models and charts could not see coming what happened in 2020. The same is happening today; that's just how the system works. Furthermore, opposite to what happened in 2020, speculative traders are holding a significant amount of short positions, effectively betting against the laws of Mother Nature, exactly like in 2020.

JustDario

67,745 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Persi Diaconis walked into a lecture at the University of Washington, held up a coin, and told a room of physicists that Richard Feynman was fooled by it his entire life. He was right. In 2007, Diaconis proved a coin flip is not 50/50. It lands on the side it started on about 51 percent of the time. The bias comes from the physics of rotation under gravity. Every physicist since Newton had assumed 50/50 without ever testing it. Every trading model built on that assumption is running on the same lie. The lecture was on Feynman's book "The Meaning of it All." Diaconis quoted the most famous line in it: "the first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool." Then he pointed out that Feynman himself was fooled by every coin he ever flipped. Feynman's own rule would have killed the 50/50 assumption on day one. The market is the same setup at scale. Every model that assumes independent 50/50 outcomes at the base layer is built on a physical impossibility. Order flow, positioning, forced flows, expiries all leave biases larger than 1 percent. Your gut cannot see them. The math already knows they are there. Diaconis's rule: before you trust a random process, check it. Actually check it. Not with a simulation. With a proof or an experiment. The coin is where you start. The chart is where the same rule pays. The only random thing about markets is how thoroughly you refuse to check them.

veles

18,798 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад