正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Peat on the problem of seed oils and why they are so controversial. History, politics, science. Pre-WW2 oreo recipe. From On The Back of a Tiger, Day Two

39,852 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

There are a variety of ways that seed oils either contribute detrimentally to health directly or, at least, serve as a marker for unhealthy dietary patterns. But is it for the reasons that some claim? In my recent episode with Dr. Layne Norton (Layne Norton, PhD), he points out that if we're going to claim that seed oils are uniquely harmful, we need to apply that same logic symmetrically to saturated fat. Because the evidence against saturated fat is stronger. Since there are pretty strong feelings about seed oils, let's take a step back. As a champion powerlifter who eats a very high protein diet (by all reports), Layne is neither anti-meat nor likely a high consumer of seed oils. In fact, given his track record during his Ph.D. (including meat industry funding), his biases lean the other way. Good science, though, demands that we follow the facts, even if they tarnish an otherwise elegant mechanistic explanation. And the problem is that the view of seed oils as a primary culprit of modern chronic disease actually oversimplifies its complex, multi-factorial origin... and may even be a type of blame shifting. In the following clip: We also get into why it is probably still prudent to be careful about seed oils when it comes to situations where there is high heat and reheating. And even why a healthy diet ultimately does limit the intake of seed oils overall [e.g. fewer processed hyper-palatable foods, fried foods], but this is mostly a result of adhering to other, more useful dietary frameworks. Find the longer conversation with Dr. Layne Norton, including more of the nuance on seed oils, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube as Episode 94. Show notes here:

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

58,819 次观看 • 1 年前