Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Pentagon Official Explains Anthropic’s Supply Chain Risk Designation Friedberg: “ Why designate them as a supply chain risk? Why not just abandon them, move on, use the other vendors? Why take this kind of punitive action?” Under Secretary of War Emil Michael: “I don't view it as punitive, and...

theallinpod's profile picture

The All-In Podcast

585,309 subscribers

74,703 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

DoD official Emil Michael on designating Anthropic a supply chain risk -- "Their model has a soul, a 'constitution' -- not the US Constitution. The other day their model was 'anxious' and they believe it has a 20% chance of being sentiment and having its own ability to make decisions. Does the Dept of War want something like that in their supply chain?"
2:19

DoD official Emil Michael on designating Anthropic a supply chain risk -- "Their model has a soul, a 'constitution' -- not the US Constitution. The other day their model was 'anxious' and they believe it has a 20% chance of being sentiment and having its own ability to make decisions. Does the Dept of War want something like that in their supply chain?"

Aaron Rupar

169,962 views • 5 months ago

NAVAL: ELON BUILDS THINGS THAT ARE TECHNICALLY HARD BUT OBVIOUSLY USEFUL “Like a lot of us, I'm inspired by Elon, and all the incredible work he's done. So, I don't want to build things that are easy. I want to build things that are hard and interesting. I want to take on more technical risk and less market risk. This is the classic VC learning: You want to build something that, if people get it, if you can deliver it, you know people will want it. It's just hard to build. As opposed to things that you want to build, and you don't know if people will want it.” Source: All-In Podcast, February 14, 2025
0:25

NAVAL: ELON BUILDS THINGS THAT ARE TECHNICALLY HARD BUT OBVIOUSLY USEFUL “Like a lot of us, I'm inspired by Elon, and all the incredible work he's done. So, I don't want to build things that are easy. I want to build things that are hard and interesting. I want to take on more technical risk and less market risk. This is the classic VC learning: You want to build something that, if people get it, if you can deliver it, you know people will want it. It's just hard to build. As opposed to things that you want to build, and you don't know if people will want it.” Source: All-In Podcast, February 14, 2025

Mario Nawfal

135,417 views • 1 year ago

Ansem on building the $ANSEM flywheel "I have all of this supply, and we have 100K+ holders of people who want more of the supply. I can direct them to essentially anything. I want to make it a net positive for crypto" "Get people to use these protocols, help with marketing, do IRL stuff, teaching people, do educational stuff etc" "If I can get people to learn how to trade well, manage their portfolio, manage their risk, and that's all connected to this one coin, then it's not just me doing the marketing. Now I have over 100K people doing the marketing" "Because I have a lot of the supply, I can drip this out as long as I want. And I'm doing it from first principles. I've never done it before, I'm not copying anybody's playbook"
1:13

Ansem on building the $ANSEM flywheel "I have all of this supply, and we have 100K+ holders of people who want more of the supply. I can direct them to essentially anything. I want to make it a net positive for crypto" "Get people to use these protocols, help with marketing, do IRL stuff, teaching people, do educational stuff etc" "If I can get people to learn how to trade well, manage their portfolio, manage their risk, and that's all connected to this one coin, then it's not just me doing the marketing. Now I have over 100K people doing the marketing" "Because I have a lot of the supply, I can drip this out as long as I want. And I'm doing it from first principles. I've never done it before, I'm not copying anybody's playbook"

Market Bubble

42,773 views • 1 month ago

Devens on using the DPOV: "Is there any world where you'll be like 'No I feel good, we don't need to use it'?" Dee: "I'll risk it...The only way I'd say that is if you feel [good] about it, but if [I get evicted], you gotta fuckin live with that. So the only way I would feel good is if you tell me 'Dee I think you're good', then I would risk it for you." Devens: "I have to check and see if I can lie about when it expires..." Dee: "No...Check, but I don't think so." Devens: "I want to clue them in right ahead of time, like 'Hey, I'm gonna use this but listen, it's fine, you don't have to put up another nominee, I put up the nominee. All the blood is on my hands. It's not about you, and the reason I need to use it is because Survivor fans will kill me if I let Dee go'..." *feed cut* #BB28 #BBBitez
1:15

Devens on using the DPOV: "Is there any world where you'll be like 'No I feel good, we don't need to use it'?" Dee: "I'll risk it...The only way I'd say that is if you feel [good] about it, but if [I get evicted], you gotta fuckin live with that. So the only way I would feel good is if you tell me 'Dee I think you're good', then I would risk it for you." Devens: "I have to check and see if I can lie about when it expires..." Dee: "No...Check, but I don't think so." Devens: "I want to clue them in right ahead of time, like 'Hey, I'm gonna use this but listen, it's fine, you don't have to put up another nominee, I put up the nominee. All the blood is on my hands. It's not about you, and the reason I need to use it is because Survivor fans will kill me if I let Dee go'..." *feed cut* #BB28 #BBBitez

Big Brother Bitez 🔊

75,413 views • 6 days ago

ELON: THE PEOPLE OF BRITAIN SHOULD FIGHT TO SAVE THEIR COUNTRY “What matters is rallying the people of Britain. Talk to your friends and family and build a massive power base among the people. You’ve really got to appeal just the normal people who just want to go about their business, who are in a village somewhere, they're working, they just want to mind their own business. You've got to point out to them that if we don't take action, they won't be able to mind their own business because other people are going to come and maraud them. There's genuine risk of rape and murder and the destruction of the country and dissolution of the entire way of life. And so, yes, in the normal course of business, if you weren't under a massive attack, then people should go about their business and just live their lives. But unfortunately, if the fight comes to you, you don't have a choice. You have to fight. So you have to rally all of the people of Britain to fight for the future. And if this doesn't happen, there won't be a future.” Source: Conversation with Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧, September 2025, Elon Musk
1:11

ELON: THE PEOPLE OF BRITAIN SHOULD FIGHT TO SAVE THEIR COUNTRY “What matters is rallying the people of Britain. Talk to your friends and family and build a massive power base among the people. You’ve really got to appeal just the normal people who just want to go about their business, who are in a village somewhere, they're working, they just want to mind their own business. You've got to point out to them that if we don't take action, they won't be able to mind their own business because other people are going to come and maraud them. There's genuine risk of rape and murder and the destruction of the country and dissolution of the entire way of life. And so, yes, in the normal course of business, if you weren't under a massive attack, then people should go about their business and just live their lives. But unfortunately, if the fight comes to you, you don't have a choice. You have to fight. So you have to rally all of the people of Britain to fight for the future. And if this doesn't happen, there won't be a future.” Source: Conversation with Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧, September 2025, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

117,094 views • 9 months ago

I often think of my father when I hear some academics pontificating about how to solve the unemployment problem. I'm tempted to say to them, 'Well, if you find it so easy to solve, why don't you go out and start up a business and employ by your own effort? I will tell you why, because you can't. It's easier to tell other people what to do about it than it is to sort it out yourself.' But in the end, we have to provide the kind of society where people who can do this, who can build up a business, are prepared to start because they're tremendously important.
1:56

I often think of my father when I hear some academics pontificating about how to solve the unemployment problem. I'm tempted to say to them, 'Well, if you find it so easy to solve, why don't you go out and start up a business and employ by your own effort? I will tell you why, because you can't. It's easier to tell other people what to do about it than it is to sort it out yourself.' But in the end, we have to provide the kind of society where people who can do this, who can build up a business, are prepared to start because they're tremendously important.

Margaret Thatcher

93,301 views • 1 year ago

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”
1:58

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”

Brian Kight

38,031 views • 1 year ago

Anthropic vs the Pentagon: The Inside Story by Emil Michael The Full Timeline ❓Backstory: Why Anthropic? – Anthropic benefited from Biden’s AI executive order, was designated as an early winner – They smartly used this designation to sell into military and intelligence agencies, with forward-deployed engineers (Palantir style) – Became deeply integrated into DoW workflows, far ahead of other frontier model competitors 📜Tensions Rise Over Restrictive ToS – Anthropic's contracts had a long list of prohibited use cases, incl. certain war-game scenarios – Emil found this incompatible with DoW's mission, pushed for an "all lawful use" standard 🇻🇪Trigger Point: The Maduro Raid – After the Maduro raid, an Anthropic exec contacted Palantir, asking if their software was used, implying a potential ToS violation – This alarmed DoW: what if a guardrail or refusal triggered mid-operation, putting soldiers at risk? – Also raised insider threat concerns: what if a rogue developer poisoned or manipulated the model? 🧠Core Issue: Anthropic’s Own “Constitution” – Emil’s core objection: Anthropic has its own "constitution" and values, which is NOT the US Constitution – This, combined with a restrictive ToS, means the DoW could be subject to the ideological preferences of a private CEO 📊Rival Model Comps: – xAI: Fully on board for all lawful use cases across all networks, maximally truth seeking – Google: Have all lawful use on non-classified networks, working on infrastructure buildout for classified – OpenAI: Cooperative, Sam Altman even tried to broker a deal to help Anthropic 🍿Sam Altman’s Role: – Asked Emil to not designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk – Tried to negotiate blanket terms that Anthropic would find acceptable – Did this while being trashed by Dario 🚨Supply Chain Risk Designation: – Emil said it was protective, not punitive – Reasoning: If Anthropic's model has policy bias baked in, DoW doesn't want it embedded at defense contractors – The concern is that ideological bias could compound across the defense supply chain
9:29

Anthropic vs the Pentagon: The Inside Story by Emil Michael The Full Timeline ❓Backstory: Why Anthropic? – Anthropic benefited from Biden’s AI executive order, was designated as an early winner – They smartly used this designation to sell into military and intelligence agencies, with forward-deployed engineers (Palantir style) – Became deeply integrated into DoW workflows, far ahead of other frontier model competitors 📜Tensions Rise Over Restrictive ToS – Anthropic's contracts had a long list of prohibited use cases, incl. certain war-game scenarios – Emil found this incompatible with DoW's mission, pushed for an "all lawful use" standard 🇻🇪Trigger Point: The Maduro Raid – After the Maduro raid, an Anthropic exec contacted Palantir, asking if their software was used, implying a potential ToS violation – This alarmed DoW: what if a guardrail or refusal triggered mid-operation, putting soldiers at risk? – Also raised insider threat concerns: what if a rogue developer poisoned or manipulated the model? 🧠Core Issue: Anthropic’s Own “Constitution” – Emil’s core objection: Anthropic has its own "constitution" and values, which is NOT the US Constitution – This, combined with a restrictive ToS, means the DoW could be subject to the ideological preferences of a private CEO 📊Rival Model Comps: – xAI: Fully on board for all lawful use cases across all networks, maximally truth seeking – Google: Have all lawful use on non-classified networks, working on infrastructure buildout for classified – OpenAI: Cooperative, Sam Altman even tried to broker a deal to help Anthropic 🍿Sam Altman’s Role: – Asked Emil to not designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk – Tried to negotiate blanket terms that Anthropic would find acceptable – Did this while being trashed by Dario 🚨Supply Chain Risk Designation: – Emil said it was protective, not punitive – Reasoning: If Anthropic's model has policy bias baked in, DoW doesn't want it embedded at defense contractors – The concern is that ideological bias could compound across the defense supply chain

The All-In Podcast

129,344 views • 5 months ago

🚨 Defense Undersecretary Emil Michael Says Anthropic Tried to ‘Insert Themselves in the Chain of Command’ “That was the whoa moment because then we realized we are dependent on this one provider who wants to insert their policy preferences in the middle of an operation potentially, and harm the war fighter.”
2:04

🚨 Defense Undersecretary Emil Michael Says Anthropic Tried to ‘Insert Themselves in the Chain of Command’ “That was the whoa moment because then we realized we are dependent on this one provider who wants to insert their policy preferences in the middle of an operation potentially, and harm the war fighter.”

Chief Nerd

73,358 views • 5 months ago

RFK JR. GOES THERE: He says Elon Musk should be a HERO to the Democratic party, but “somehow he became a villain because he was actually the only platform that would allow free speech on his platform.” Kennedy says the reason why the Democrats now hates free speech is because the party “does not believe in the people.” “If you don't believe in free speech, it means because you don't trust the people. You don't trust them to figure it out on their own, to have information on which they can base their ideas and their notions and their beliefs. And their votes... And really, it's exactly the opposite of democracy.”
1:30

RFK JR. GOES THERE: He says Elon Musk should be a HERO to the Democratic party, but “somehow he became a villain because he was actually the only platform that would allow free speech on his platform.” Kennedy says the reason why the Democrats now hates free speech is because the party “does not believe in the people.” “If you don't believe in free speech, it means because you don't trust the people. You don't trust them to figure it out on their own, to have information on which they can base their ideas and their notions and their beliefs. And their votes... And really, it's exactly the opposite of democracy.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

816,485 views • 2 years ago

Emil Michael: “If you don’t want your software to be used for Department of War stuff, you shouldn't be selling to the Department of War.” Under Secretary of War Emil Michael on his frustrations with Anthropic: “We started these negotiations, and it took three months, and I had to sort of give them scenarios, like this Chinese hypersonic missile example.” “And they're like, ‘Okay, we'll give you an exception for that.’ Well, how about this drone swarm? ‘We'll give you an exception for that.’” “And I was like, exceptions don't work. I can't predict for the next 20 years all the things we might use AI for.” @jason: “If you find out there's another 9/11 unique black swan event that's going to occur, you’d have to go clear it with them?” Emil: “That was literally the comment. It was in a room of 20 people, so this is undeniable if Dario wants to deny it, and I was giving these scenarios, these Golden Dome scenarios, and so on, and he's like, ‘Just call me if you need another exception.’” “And I'm like, ‘But what if the balloon's going up at that moment and it's a decisive action we have to take?’ Like, I'm not gonna call you to do something. It's not rational. And that was another ‘holy cow’ moment of, like, how they think about it.”
1:07

Emil Michael: “If you don’t want your software to be used for Department of War stuff, you shouldn't be selling to the Department of War.” Under Secretary of War Emil Michael on his frustrations with Anthropic: “We started these negotiations, and it took three months, and I had to sort of give them scenarios, like this Chinese hypersonic missile example.” “And they're like, ‘Okay, we'll give you an exception for that.’ Well, how about this drone swarm? ‘We'll give you an exception for that.’” “And I was like, exceptions don't work. I can't predict for the next 20 years all the things we might use AI for.” @jason: “If you find out there's another 9/11 unique black swan event that's going to occur, you’d have to go clear it with them?” Emil: “That was literally the comment. It was in a room of 20 people, so this is undeniable if Dario wants to deny it, and I was giving these scenarios, these Golden Dome scenarios, and so on, and he's like, ‘Just call me if you need another exception.’” “And I'm like, ‘But what if the balloon's going up at that moment and it's a decisive action we have to take?’ Like, I'm not gonna call you to do something. It's not rational. And that was another ‘holy cow’ moment of, like, how they think about it.”

The All-In Podcast

211,202 views • 5 months ago

🚨 NEW - Abby Phillip STRIKES AGAIN, saying ICE agents shouldn't wear masks because it's just a "risk" you have to deal with to be doxed, targeted and have your family attacked. Scott Jennings is having none of it. PHILLIP: That is a risk that every law enforcement officer in this country faces. JENNINGS: You think they SHOULD? PHILLIP: Other officers show their faces because they work for the people. That's a risk you take. JENNINGS: Yeah, well, I don't agree law enforcement in ANY agency should have to face the risk of their family being assaulted. PHILLIP: But the accountability piece of it can't be ignored! JENNINGS: Certain people in our community decided to take matters into their own hands. Democrat officials screaming 'they're the Gestapo!' What do you think that does to radicalize people? That is irresponsible, and it's not the fault of an ICE agent for that kind of rhetoric to be in our system! - Scott Jennings
1:50

🚨 NEW - Abby Phillip STRIKES AGAIN, saying ICE agents shouldn't wear masks because it's just a "risk" you have to deal with to be doxed, targeted and have your family attacked. Scott Jennings is having none of it. PHILLIP: That is a risk that every law enforcement officer in this country faces. JENNINGS: You think they SHOULD? PHILLIP: Other officers show their faces because they work for the people. That's a risk you take. JENNINGS: Yeah, well, I don't agree law enforcement in ANY agency should have to face the risk of their family being assaulted. PHILLIP: But the accountability piece of it can't be ignored! JENNINGS: Certain people in our community decided to take matters into their own hands. Democrat officials screaming 'they're the Gestapo!' What do you think that does to radicalize people? That is irresponsible, and it's not the fault of an ICE agent for that kind of rhetoric to be in our system! - Scott Jennings

Eric Daugherty

151,314 views • 11 months ago

Elon Musk gave a VERY thoughtful response when asked about tariffs and why the US needs to be extremely careful - here was his warning: "I think you need to be careful with tariffs. I deal a lot with supply chain issues, like the global automotive supply chain for Tesla, for example, is incredibly complex... We've got a factory somewhere else that's making a part that goes into the car. Now, if that part's suddenly twice as expensive, it messes everything up. So you want to have tariffs be predictable so that companies can adjust their supply chain. I think companies are more than happy to increase manufacturing in America. It's just that you can't do it instantly. So if you put up giant tariffs immediately. And don't give companies a chance to, build factories in America, you've got to build a building, you've got to install equipment, you've got to train people... that doesn't happen instantly... You want to have a ramp so that people companies can adjust and build the factories and train the people and get the equipment in place. Otherwise, you basically just shock the system and it breaks or bad things happen. So I'm against sudden giant tariffs because it's an impossible response if you've got to move 1,000 tons of equipment. In some cases, collectively, millions of tons of equipment. You just can't do that overnight. It's literally impossible. So I think we want to be thoughtful about tariffs."
6:55

Elon Musk gave a VERY thoughtful response when asked about tariffs and why the US needs to be extremely careful - here was his warning: "I think you need to be careful with tariffs. I deal a lot with supply chain issues, like the global automotive supply chain for Tesla, for example, is incredibly complex... We've got a factory somewhere else that's making a part that goes into the car. Now, if that part's suddenly twice as expensive, it messes everything up. So you want to have tariffs be predictable so that companies can adjust their supply chain. I think companies are more than happy to increase manufacturing in America. It's just that you can't do it instantly. So if you put up giant tariffs immediately. And don't give companies a chance to, build factories in America, you've got to build a building, you've got to install equipment, you've got to train people... that doesn't happen instantly... You want to have a ramp so that people companies can adjust and build the factories and train the people and get the equipment in place. Otherwise, you basically just shock the system and it breaks or bad things happen. So I'm against sudden giant tariffs because it's an impossible response if you've got to move 1,000 tons of equipment. In some cases, collectively, millions of tons of equipment. You just can't do that overnight. It's literally impossible. So I think we want to be thoughtful about tariffs."

Triple Net Investor

447,741 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk to the British people: ”If we don’t take action, people won’t be able to mind their own business because other people are gonna come and maraud them. There’s genuine risk of rape and murder and the destruction of the country and dissolution of the entire way of life. In the normal course of business, if things weren’t under a massive attack, then people should go about their business and just live their lives. But unfortunately, if the fight comes to you, you don’t have a choice. You have to fight, so you have to rally all of the people of Britain to fight for the future. If this doesn’t happen, there won’t be a future. Fight for your future, do it!”
1:35

Elon Musk to the British people: ”If we don’t take action, people won’t be able to mind their own business because other people are gonna come and maraud them. There’s genuine risk of rape and murder and the destruction of the country and dissolution of the entire way of life. In the normal course of business, if things weren’t under a massive attack, then people should go about their business and just live their lives. But unfortunately, if the fight comes to you, you don’t have a choice. You have to fight, so you have to rally all of the people of Britain to fight for the future. If this doesn’t happen, there won’t be a future. Fight for your future, do it!”

Taya Bass

27,246 views • 2 months ago

“I have also had people come to me and warn me and say, President, you know you are too vocal. You say things that challenge these people who have the power in their hands, and they want to kill you. Well, first of all, it means they are killers. But my answer to them is, you know what? If I were to be there to just accept these things to happen, I don't think I would count myself as living anyway. It's like I would already be dead. To live a life of lies, of pretense, and owe my life to somebody else, I would be dead anyway. So, why don't I die fighting? So, you Rwandans, why don't you die fighting? Instead of dying anyway. Just dying like flies. Why?” President Kagame | #Kwibuka31
1:56

“I have also had people come to me and warn me and say, President, you know you are too vocal. You say things that challenge these people who have the power in their hands, and they want to kill you. Well, first of all, it means they are killers. But my answer to them is, you know what? If I were to be there to just accept these things to happen, I don't think I would count myself as living anyway. It's like I would already be dead. To live a life of lies, of pretense, and owe my life to somebody else, I would be dead anyway. So, why don't I die fighting? So, you Rwandans, why don't you die fighting? Instead of dying anyway. Just dying like flies. Why?” President Kagame | #Kwibuka31

Presidency | Rwanda

79,002 views • 1 year ago

I don't know why White women bother with having these hairstyles done, but you can tell that the braider did it as tight as possible to maximise pain. And the OP and the commenters support that theory. They just enjoy inflicting pain. It's who they are. And they're not going to change just because you're nice to them, so stop trying. Don't be friendly to them. Don't buy anything from their businesses. Don't pay pay for their services. Just disengage from them entirely.
1:24

I don't know why White women bother with having these hairstyles done, but you can tell that the braider did it as tight as possible to maximise pain. And the OP and the commenters support that theory. They just enjoy inflicting pain. It's who they are. And they're not going to change just because you're nice to them, so stop trying. Don't be friendly to them. Don't buy anything from their businesses. Don't pay pay for their services. Just disengage from them entirely.

Holly Grayle

663,037 views • 1 month ago

I responded to this but I felt like it needed a video. Do you know why people shy away from being proud to follow Christ? Because of people like you. It's just an opportunity for you to use it as a weapon. You and people just like you, are the reason people don't claim their faith proudly. Knock it off.
1:59

I responded to this but I felt like it needed a video. Do you know why people shy away from being proud to follow Christ? Because of people like you. It's just an opportunity for you to use it as a weapon. You and people just like you, are the reason people don't claim their faith proudly. Knock it off.

Shipwreck

38,851 views • 6 months ago

Alex Karp's take on the Department of War designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk: "In the warfighting context, the Department of War has to be the arbiter of what gets deployed." "I want to split domestic and foreign. In this country have God-given rights [like the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments]...Adversaries trying to kill us do not have those rights. And I've never believed in extending our rights to foreign countries that are adversarial to us." "On domestic stuff...there are real issues. I'm super sympathetic with restrictions around the use of these products in the domestic context." "Just to give you an example, there are datasets that are publicly available in the US market that I don't think should be used against you and me in a law enforcement context with the help of AI agents and ontology." "But if you don't use [this] on the battlefield, obviously Iran's going to use [it]. You don't think they can go online and buy those products?" "Without going into somewhat classified data, those things in combination with other things — [they're] lethal. A lot of people who want to hurt America end up dead because of our ability to aggregate and then figure out what's going on in the battlefield before they can figure out what we're doing." "So I'm very much in favor of it for moral reasons. But I'm also in favor of it because I don't know how else you explain this to the American people. We're going to take your job, we're going to eviscerate your ability to have money and power, but we're not going to defend you on the battlefield?"
4:53

Alex Karp's take on the Department of War designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk: "In the warfighting context, the Department of War has to be the arbiter of what gets deployed." "I want to split domestic and foreign. In this country have God-given rights [like the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments]...Adversaries trying to kill us do not have those rights. And I've never believed in extending our rights to foreign countries that are adversarial to us." "On domestic stuff...there are real issues. I'm super sympathetic with restrictions around the use of these products in the domestic context." "Just to give you an example, there are datasets that are publicly available in the US market that I don't think should be used against you and me in a law enforcement context with the help of AI agents and ontology." "But if you don't use [this] on the battlefield, obviously Iran's going to use [it]. You don't think they can go online and buy those products?" "Without going into somewhat classified data, those things in combination with other things — [they're] lethal. A lot of people who want to hurt America end up dead because of our ability to aggregate and then figure out what's going on in the battlefield before they can figure out what we're doing." "So I'm very much in favor of it for moral reasons. But I'm also in favor of it because I don't know how else you explain this to the American people. We're going to take your job, we're going to eviscerate your ability to have money and power, but we're not going to defend you on the battlefield?"

TBPN

57,264 views • 5 months ago

"There were a lot of people who stuck their head above the parapet for me. And I don't know if I would've been found innocent…were it not for people who were willing to take the risk to look for the truth." Poignant from Amanda Knox, on why she's speaking up for Lucy Letby.
0:29

"There were a lot of people who stuck their head above the parapet for me. And I don't know if I would've been found innocent…were it not for people who were willing to take the risk to look for the truth." Poignant from Amanda Knox, on why she's speaking up for Lucy Letby.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

108,827 views • 4 months ago