Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Performed the same task on Opus 5.5. Opus 5.5 performed significantly better but used 10x more tokens. Opus also drew 3x faster than Astra.

thermalpastor's profile picture

H

2,279 subscribers

34,940 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ФинансыОбразованиеНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля Charlie Greenman
Charlie Greenman2 дней назад

Looped transformers at work

Фото профиля 𝕱𝖚𝖑𝖑 𝕶𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖞
𝕱𝖚𝖑𝖑 𝕶𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖞2 дней назад

part of why these look so 'inhuman' imo is there is no *progressive* commitment: no loose sketch, no commitment to form, no varied linework, no layered colours etc. the model sees a final output and takes the most direct route there with no change of mind along the way

Фото профиля AGTP
AGTP2 дней назад

The trade-off between intelligence and token usage is such a fascinating part of this release. We actually went deeper on the new models here:

Фото профиля Rugwed
Rugwed2 дней назад

the 10x token number is the real takeaway. if you're paying 10x per run for better spatial reasoning, the question is whether the task gets cheaper over time as the model gets efficient, or if drawing stays premium forever

Фото профиля LegendarySaiyajin
LegendarySaiyajin2 дней назад

Highly impressive. Question is which one cost more in daily/weekly usage though...

Фото профиля Man
Man2 дней назад

Make sure your not using opus max for anything.

Фото профиля Zero G Talent
Zero G Talent2 дней назад

A very interesting comparison! Do you think the performance jump justifies that 10x increase in token usage for most production tasks?

Похожие видео

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.
0:32

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

ego

113,145 просмотров • 1 день назад

Opus 5.5 is here! 🎉 It's honestly such a nice model to work with. Feels like Fable, but ~30% faster and ~40% cheaper per task than Opus 5. Go try it out!
3:32

Opus 5.5 is here! 🎉 It's honestly such a nice model to work with. Feels like Fable, but ~30% faster and ~40% cheaper per task than Opus 5. Go try it out!

Lydia Hallie ✨

289,505 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?
1:12

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?

J A Z I I

52,951 просмотров • 3 дней назад

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.
1:10

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.

Shimecki

172,367 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Is Opus 5.5 better than GPT-6 Astra at Physical Intelligence "literally" ? put GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 in two Unitree G1s in MuJoCo Ring Fence. Every 2 sim seconds: state → LLM → joint targets → act. Goal: force the other out of the ring, and Astra won after 31 second.
0:30

Is Opus 5.5 better than GPT-6 Astra at Physical Intelligence "literally" ? put GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 in two Unitree G1s in MuJoCo Ring Fence. Every 2 sim seconds: state → LLM → joint targets → act. Goal: force the other out of the ring, and Astra won after 31 second.

Jiafei Duan

52,198 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.
0:41

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

2,760,034 просмотров • 3 дней назад

First Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra test is 3D. One prompt, Blender only, all procedural. Render the 10-second shot, and record your own build timelapse. Opus 5.5: 35 min, 199.6k output tokens, about $13.3 in API terms. GPT-6 Astra: 28 min, 56.6k output tokens, about $14.5 in API terms. Feels like a worthy rival, and honestly I am glad about that. From what I watched, Opus juggles way more at once and is faster overall. Astra is still good imo.
0:46

First Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra test is 3D. One prompt, Blender only, all procedural. Render the 10-second shot, and record your own build timelapse. Opus 5.5: 35 min, 199.6k output tokens, about $13.3 in API terms. GPT-6 Astra: 28 min, 56.6k output tokens, about $14.5 in API terms. Feels like a worthy rival, and honestly I am glad about that. From what I watched, Opus juggles way more at once and is faster overall. Astra is still good imo.

Stefan 3D AI

461,939 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Claude Opus 5.5 drew self-portraits using JavaScript and composed the piano score.
0:20

Claude Opus 5.5 drew self-portraits using JavaScript and composed the piano score.

Kevin Ngo

81,199 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Anthropic cooked with Opus 5.5 🔥🔥 its better than Fable 5.1 and Astra its little close to real one those tiny details: jaguar logo, sensors > 3d model of Waymo autonomous vehicle (Jaguar I-PACE crossover SUV) Opus 5.5 max in Claude code
0:40

Anthropic cooked with Opus 5.5 🔥🔥 its better than Fable 5.1 and Astra its little close to real one those tiny details: jaguar logo, sensors > 3d model of Waymo autonomous vehicle (Jaguar I-PACE crossover SUV) Opus 5.5 max in Claude code

Harshith

44,294 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Same prompt. Opus 5.5 built Sakura Crossing in 2 hours. That's 1/12 the time Opus 5 took, and it's on another level.
1:21

Same prompt. Opus 5.5 built Sakura Crossing in 2 hours. That's 1/12 the time Opus 5 took, and it's on another level.

GMI Cloud

162,421 просмотров • 1 день назад

Opus 5.5 is my new daily driver. Fable-level on most work, cheaper and faster than Opus 5 and Pro/Max/Team users just got a banked reset! Demo:
0:27

Opus 5.5 is my new daily driver. Fable-level on most work, cheaper and faster than Opus 5 and Pro/Max/Team users just got a banked reset! Demo:

Addy Osmani

35,473 просмотров • 2 дней назад

I gave GPT 6 SOL and OPUS 5.5 the same prompt. It was not even close. Opus 5.5 is THE BEST model we have ever seen. links to game below.
1:37

I gave GPT 6 SOL and OPUS 5.5 the same prompt. It was not even close. Opus 5.5 is THE BEST model we have ever seen. links to game below.

Max Blade

228,071 просмотров • 3 дней назад

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:
0:30

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

Peter Yang

75,544 просмотров • 3 дней назад

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.
0:30

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

162,515 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.
0:20

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in our new Claude 5.5 family. It performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks, and costs 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Claude

25,352,040 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.
0:23

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.

BridgeMind

53,391 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

GPT-6 Astra vs Opus 5.5. Two of the biggest models going head-to-head. Who actually takes it?
0:20

GPT-6 Astra vs Opus 5.5. Two of the biggest models going head-to-head. Who actually takes it?

Prashant

152,408 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Claude Opus 5.5 just ONE SHOT a Mario Kart game. The result is way better than Fable 5.1. The attention to detail is on another level. Opus 5.5 actually created real characters. Mario, Luigi, in the game, playable. Fable 5.1 has never done that. Insanely impressed. This model is different.
0:52

Claude Opus 5.5 just ONE SHOT a Mario Kart game. The result is way better than Fable 5.1. The attention to detail is on another level. Opus 5.5 actually created real characters. Mario, Luigi, in the game, playable. Fable 5.1 has never done that. Insanely impressed. This model is different.

BridgeMind

358,007 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai
0:20

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai

Jun Song

118,502 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Opus 4.8 for planning 🤝 GPT 5.5 for implementation Claude is a nicer conversation and /grilling partner than Codex in my experience, but GPT 5.5 on low cranks out higher quality code in fewer tokens. Here's how I divide up the work:
1:20

Opus 4.8 for planning 🤝 GPT 5.5 for implementation Claude is a nicer conversation and /grilling partner than Codex in my experience, but GPT 5.5 on low cranks out higher quality code in fewer tokens. Here's how I divide up the work:

Ben Holmes

23,115 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад