Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Perplexity CEO told Joe Rogan that Microsoft created office work. The dates say otherwise. To be fair to him, half of it is true. Gates really did want a PC on every desk, and Microsoft did make Word and Excel the default tools that almost every office job trains...

alex_prompter's profile picture

Alex Prompter

279,043 subscribers

31,371 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Microsoft invented the knowledge worker to sell more office software. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's what happened. Bill Gates vision was simple: put a PC on every desk. Not to make computing beautiful (that was Steve Jobs). Just to sell more software. Word. Excel. Email. People went to tutorials to learn these tools. Then companies made them the price of admission for employment. The entire concept of an office career was a sales strategy. Now AI is replacing the very work Microsoft created. And maybe that's not a bad thing. Because sitting in a cubicle using Excel was never how humans were supposed to find purpose. The most curious people have the most fulfilling lives. Not the richest. Not the smartest. The whole knowledge economy was built to sell software. What happens when the software sells itself?
2:19

Microsoft invented the knowledge worker to sell more office software. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's what happened. Bill Gates vision was simple: put a PC on every desk. Not to make computing beautiful (that was Steve Jobs). Just to sell more software. Word. Excel. Email. People went to tutorials to learn these tools. Then companies made them the price of admission for employment. The entire concept of an office career was a sales strategy. Now AI is replacing the very work Microsoft created. And maybe that's not a bad thing. Because sitting in a cubicle using Excel was never how humans were supposed to find purpose. The most curious people have the most fulfilling lives. Not the richest. Not the smartest. The whole knowledge economy was built to sell software. What happens when the software sells itself?

Shruti

13,002 views • 4 months ago

Balaji Srinivasan on taking the L to set up for the W: "Before Satya Nadella took over Microsoft, it was losing on mobile to iOS and Android." "He took the L... and he said, 'You know what? Linux is there. Linux is not going to go away.'" "We're going to run Linux on Microsoft hardware." "Mobile is not going away and nobody's installing the Microsoft mobile OS." "So we're going to allow Word and PowerPoint and Excel to run on iOS and Android devices." "And... the browser isn't going away. So we're going to make Office 365 work in the cloud." "Because he took the L, Satya set Microsoft up for the W." Balaji with Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
1:10

Balaji Srinivasan on taking the L to set up for the W: "Before Satya Nadella took over Microsoft, it was losing on mobile to iOS and Android." "He took the L... and he said, 'You know what? Linux is there. Linux is not going to go away.'" "We're going to run Linux on Microsoft hardware." "Mobile is not going away and nobody's installing the Microsoft mobile OS." "So we're going to allow Word and PowerPoint and Excel to run on iOS and Android devices." "And... the browser isn't going away. So we're going to make Office 365 work in the cloud." "Because he took the L, Satya set Microsoft up for the W." Balaji with Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪

a16z

152,169 views • 7 months ago

One of Michael Moritz's best stories on obsession is about the ride he got from Bill Gates when Microsoft was still private. "Bill Gates gave me a ride to the airport in his car. The radio was missing in the car, a big, gaping hole in the dashboard. I said, Bill, what happened to you, did you get ripped off? And he said no, I had it taken out. Why'd you have it taken out? Well, I drive from my home to the office, which is 7 minutes and 32 seconds, and then I'll drive from the office to the airport, which is however long. And he said if I've got the radio, I'm afraid that I'll switch it on and I won't be thinking about Microsoft. That's obsession."
1:10

One of Michael Moritz's best stories on obsession is about the ride he got from Bill Gates when Microsoft was still private. "Bill Gates gave me a ride to the airport in his car. The radio was missing in the car, a big, gaping hole in the dashboard. I said, Bill, what happened to you, did you get ripped off? And he said no, I had it taken out. Why'd you have it taken out? Well, I drive from my home to the office, which is 7 minutes and 32 seconds, and then I'll drive from the office to the airport, which is however long. And he said if I've got the radio, I'm afraid that I'll switch it on and I won't be thinking about Microsoft. That's obsession."

Patrick OShaughnessy

145,277 views • 1 month ago

holy shit! this is INSANE… Microsoft just launched copilot cowork. built with Anthropic. you describe what you want done. it turns your request into a plan and executes it across outlook, teams, excel. 90% of the fortune 500 already use copilot or Microsoft tools. now it does the work for you. the execution era is here and only accelerating.
1:47

holy shit! this is INSANE… Microsoft just launched copilot cowork. built with Anthropic. you describe what you want done. it turns your request into a plan and executes it across outlook, teams, excel. 90% of the fortune 500 already use copilot or Microsoft tools. now it does the work for you. the execution era is here and only accelerating.

Damian Player

166,920 views • 8 months ago

MICROSOFT JUST OPEN SOURCED THE ENTIRE AGENT RUNTIME, SO YOU NEVER HAVE TO BUILD ONE AGAIN a raw model only writes text. to make it a real agent it needs a loop, tools, memory, planning, approvals, and a way to know when it is done. Microsoft's Agent Harness is that whole layer, and it ships with everything on by default. you bring the model and the tools, it wires up the rest: > an automatic tool calling loop with iteration limits > history saved after every call, so a crash resumes instead of starting over > context compaction that summarizes when the window fills > a persistent todo list plus plan and execute modes > file memory that survives across turns > tool approval with standing rules and auto approval > OpenTelemetry tracing and web search built in > Agent Skills that load domain expertise on demand the mental model is simple: the model is the brain, the harness is the body around it. and it works with whatever you already run: > Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Anthropic, and GitHub Copilot, and it hosts on Microsoft Foundry you spin one up in a single line: agent = create_harness_agent(client, name, instructions) open source, Python, .NET, and Go, stable since mid 2026. bookmark this. Microsoft already built the hard part of every AI agent, you just plug in the model.
0:23

MICROSOFT JUST OPEN SOURCED THE ENTIRE AGENT RUNTIME, SO YOU NEVER HAVE TO BUILD ONE AGAIN a raw model only writes text. to make it a real agent it needs a loop, tools, memory, planning, approvals, and a way to know when it is done. Microsoft's Agent Harness is that whole layer, and it ships with everything on by default. you bring the model and the tools, it wires up the rest: > an automatic tool calling loop with iteration limits > history saved after every call, so a crash resumes instead of starting over > context compaction that summarizes when the window fills > a persistent todo list plus plan and execute modes > file memory that survives across turns > tool approval with standing rules and auto approval > OpenTelemetry tracing and web search built in > Agent Skills that load domain expertise on demand the mental model is simple: the model is the brain, the harness is the body around it. and it works with whatever you already run: > Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Anthropic, and GitHub Copilot, and it hosts on Microsoft Foundry you spin one up in a single line: agent = create_harness_agent(client, name, instructions) open source, Python, .NET, and Go, stable since mid 2026. bookmark this. Microsoft already built the hard part of every AI agent, you just plug in the model.

NO1ennn

69,163 views • 2 months ago

Matt Mullenweg told us the best acquisition his company ever made. He'd been studying Microsoft. For every $1 Microsoft made on Windows, the ecosystem around it made about $20. He wanted the app that sat on top of WordPress the way Office sat on top of Windows. He found it in a 40-person company in South Africa with 4 engineers. It was called woocommerce. They beat out a private equity firm to buy it. Last year over $30b in goods and services sold through it.
1:45

Matt Mullenweg told us the best acquisition his company ever made. He'd been studying Microsoft. For every $1 Microsoft made on Windows, the ecosystem around it made about $20. He wanted the app that sat on top of WordPress the way Office sat on top of Windows. He found it in a 40-person company in South Africa with 4 engineers. It was called woocommerce. They beat out a private equity firm to buy it. Last year over $30b in goods and services sold through it.

Sam Parr

31,113 views • 4 months ago

MICROSOFT QUIETLY SHIPPED THE RAG PIPELINE EVERYONE KEEPS TRYING TO BUILD FROM SCRATCH it is called Kernel Memory, and it turns any pile of files into an AI memory that answers with citations. drop your data in and Microsoft's pipeline does the rest: > ingest PDFs, Word, PPT, Excel, web pages, even images > extract the text, chunk it, embed it into vectors > store the vectors with metadata and keep the originals in blob storage > ask a question and it pulls the right chunks with semantic plus hybrid search then it hands the answer back grounded, with links to the exact source and full token usage. and it plugs into whatever you already run: > Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Ollama, or Anthropic for the models > Qdrant, pgvector, Redis, or Azure AI Search for the vectors > every step is a swappable handler, so you can replace any part with your own one heads up: Microsoft archived the repo in June 2026 and ships it as a reference blueprint, not production. but as a map for how memory and RAG are actually built, nothing is cleaner. run it in one command: docker run kernelmemory/service bookmark this. Microsoft already drew the blueprint, you just build on it.
0:25

MICROSOFT QUIETLY SHIPPED THE RAG PIPELINE EVERYONE KEEPS TRYING TO BUILD FROM SCRATCH it is called Kernel Memory, and it turns any pile of files into an AI memory that answers with citations. drop your data in and Microsoft's pipeline does the rest: > ingest PDFs, Word, PPT, Excel, web pages, even images > extract the text, chunk it, embed it into vectors > store the vectors with metadata and keep the originals in blob storage > ask a question and it pulls the right chunks with semantic plus hybrid search then it hands the answer back grounded, with links to the exact source and full token usage. and it plugs into whatever you already run: > Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Ollama, or Anthropic for the models > Qdrant, pgvector, Redis, or Azure AI Search for the vectors > every step is a swappable handler, so you can replace any part with your own one heads up: Microsoft archived the repo in June 2026 and ships it as a reference blueprint, not production. but as a map for how memory and RAG are actually built, nothing is cleaner. run it in one command: docker run kernelmemory/service bookmark this. Microsoft already drew the blueprint, you just build on it.

NO1ennn

85,704 views • 2 months ago

In 2007, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates sat on the same stage and were asked one question: what has the other guy contributed? Gates said he’d give a lot to have Steve’s taste. Jobs said Apple spent decades missing the one thing Microsoft was good at from day one And the rivalry everyone loved to write about? Jobs said Apple stopped needing to win it back in 1997 The conversation was at the D5 conference, hosted by Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher. It was the first time in years the two had done a joint interview Jobs went first. Bill, he said, built the first software company in the industry, before anybody really knew what a software company was. He was focused on software before almost anyone else had a clue that software was what mattered Gates answered with the Apple II. In 1977, Apple bet that a computer could be a mass market machine. Then came the Macintosh, and Apple really bet the company on it. Steve builds the products he wants to use himself, Gates said, with incredible taste and elegance. When Steve went back, Apple was literally failing Their history goes back further than most people know. The original Apple II ran a BASIC that Steve Wozniak wrote by hand on paper. It was brilliant, Jobs said, except it didn’t do floating point. They kept begging Woz to add it. He never did. So Apple went to Microsoft and asked for help. Apple paid $31,000 for Microsoft’s version, and Gates flew down to spend two days getting it working Then came the Mac. At the time, Microsoft wasn’t really in the applications business. Lotus ruled it on the PC. So Microsoft bet its future on the Mac making graphical interfaces popular. Back in 1984, Gates said Microsoft expected half its revenue that year to come from Mac software. The original Mac had 128K of memory By 1997, things had flipped. Windows was everywhere and Apple was in serious trouble. Jobs said too many people inside Apple were still playing a game where, for Apple to win, Microsoft had to lose And if that was the game, Apple was going to lose His fix was to stop playing it. Apple didn’t have to beat Microsoft, he said. Apple had to remember who Apple was, because it had forgotten. So he called Bill and they patched things up. He even went further. When he came back, he gave Apple’s old machines and papers to Stanford to clear out the cobwebs. You can’t look back and say I wish I hadn’t gotten fired, he said. Let’s go invent tomorrow Their advice to founders was nearly identical. Gates said the economic value was never the excitement. Even when they wrote down a computer on every desk and in every home, they didn’t think about being a big company. Jobs said you have to love what you do, because it’s so hard that any rational person would give up. Most people who fail, he said, quit because they’re sane Then the moderators asked what each learned from the other Gates said he’d give a lot to have Steve’s taste. In Mac product reviews, he’d see a question as an engineering problem, while Jobs made the decision on a sense of people and product that even Gates couldn’t fully explain Jobs said Apple was never good at partnering, because they started out building the whole thing themselves. Microsoft learned to partner early. If Apple had had a little more of that in its DNA, he said, it would have served it extremely well He ended with a Beatles line: you and I have memories longer than the road that stretches out ahead Most people think business is about beating the other guy The two biggest rivals in tech history spent the evening describing what they envied in each other You don’t have to beat your rival. You have to remember who you are So, Team Jobs or Team Gates? Watch the full conversation below ↓ timestamps in the first reply
1:21:16

In 2007, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates sat on the same stage and were asked one question: what has the other guy contributed? Gates said he’d give a lot to have Steve’s taste. Jobs said Apple spent decades missing the one thing Microsoft was good at from day one And the rivalry everyone loved to write about? Jobs said Apple stopped needing to win it back in 1997 The conversation was at the D5 conference, hosted by Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher. It was the first time in years the two had done a joint interview Jobs went first. Bill, he said, built the first software company in the industry, before anybody really knew what a software company was. He was focused on software before almost anyone else had a clue that software was what mattered Gates answered with the Apple II. In 1977, Apple bet that a computer could be a mass market machine. Then came the Macintosh, and Apple really bet the company on it. Steve builds the products he wants to use himself, Gates said, with incredible taste and elegance. When Steve went back, Apple was literally failing Their history goes back further than most people know. The original Apple II ran a BASIC that Steve Wozniak wrote by hand on paper. It was brilliant, Jobs said, except it didn’t do floating point. They kept begging Woz to add it. He never did. So Apple went to Microsoft and asked for help. Apple paid $31,000 for Microsoft’s version, and Gates flew down to spend two days getting it working Then came the Mac. At the time, Microsoft wasn’t really in the applications business. Lotus ruled it on the PC. So Microsoft bet its future on the Mac making graphical interfaces popular. Back in 1984, Gates said Microsoft expected half its revenue that year to come from Mac software. The original Mac had 128K of memory By 1997, things had flipped. Windows was everywhere and Apple was in serious trouble. Jobs said too many people inside Apple were still playing a game where, for Apple to win, Microsoft had to lose And if that was the game, Apple was going to lose His fix was to stop playing it. Apple didn’t have to beat Microsoft, he said. Apple had to remember who Apple was, because it had forgotten. So he called Bill and they patched things up. He even went further. When he came back, he gave Apple’s old machines and papers to Stanford to clear out the cobwebs. You can’t look back and say I wish I hadn’t gotten fired, he said. Let’s go invent tomorrow Their advice to founders was nearly identical. Gates said the economic value was never the excitement. Even when they wrote down a computer on every desk and in every home, they didn’t think about being a big company. Jobs said you have to love what you do, because it’s so hard that any rational person would give up. Most people who fail, he said, quit because they’re sane Then the moderators asked what each learned from the other Gates said he’d give a lot to have Steve’s taste. In Mac product reviews, he’d see a question as an engineering problem, while Jobs made the decision on a sense of people and product that even Gates couldn’t fully explain Jobs said Apple was never good at partnering, because they started out building the whole thing themselves. Microsoft learned to partner early. If Apple had had a little more of that in its DNA, he said, it would have served it extremely well He ended with a Beatles line: you and I have memories longer than the road that stretches out ahead Most people think business is about beating the other guy The two biggest rivals in tech history spent the evening describing what they envied in each other You don’t have to beat your rival. You have to remember who you are So, Team Jobs or Team Gates? Watch the full conversation below ↓ timestamps in the first reply

qurool

71,891 views • 27 days ago

"I don't think we ever go back to where we were," says $BLCO CEO Brent Saunders on remote vs. in person work. "I used to be a real stickler that work is in the office. Everyone needed to be in the office. The pandemic opened my eyes to some of the benefits of remote work."
4:27

"I don't think we ever go back to where we were," says $BLCO CEO Brent Saunders on remote vs. in person work. "I used to be a real stickler that work is in the office. Everyone needed to be in the office. The pandemic opened my eyes to some of the benefits of remote work."

Squawk Box

89,123 views • 3 years ago

Microsoft is deceiving you by inflating its AI empire with money it handed its OWN customer first. They sold Wall Street a $37 billion AI business, then went silent the moment its own filing showed where that money came from. The line sits in the annual report for fiscal 2026: Microsoft recorded $24.1 billion of revenue from commercial arrangements with OpenAI, including revenue sharing payments. If you run that figure against Microsoft's own AI disclosures you'll find that OpenAI made up more than half, and likely around 70%, of everything the company counts as AI sales. ONE customer. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed the figure covers all sales and revenue share from OpenAI. The 70% comes by assuming Microsoft's AI run rate kept growing at the 123% pace the company itself reported in March, which is the company's own optimistic math turned around on it. Now follow where that money starts: Microsoft has put around $12 billion into OpenAI since 2019. OpenAI spends its cash on computing power, and Microsoft is the cloud provider selling it. So the money leaves as an investment and comes back as an Azure bill. Microsoft then books that bill as AI revenue and shows it to investors as proof the AI business is "working." Microsoft invests in OpenAI -> OpenAI buys Microsoft compute -> Microsoft records the payment as AI revenue -> the AI growth story goes to Wall Street And a chunk of it never actually arrived. The same filing shows $6 billion of accounts receivable from OpenAI as of June 30. That is $6 billion of AI revenue Microsoft booked and had not been paid when the year closed. Now here's where it gets really concerning for anyone holding the stock... Microsoft has told the public how big its total AI business is exactly twice. Once for the quarter ending December 2024, when it said the unit was on pace for more than $13 billion a year. And once for the quarter ending March 2026, when Satya Nadella put it on pace for $37 billion. That $37 billion number went everywhere. It was the headline proof that Microsoft had won the AI race. Then fourth quarter earnings arrived, and Microsoft did NOT update it. The company that had been announcing the figure as its own scoreboard stopped announcing the figure. In the same stretch, the filing landed showing where most of it came from. So what is actually left underneath? The full year AI business ran near $34 billion. Take OpenAI out and roughly $10 billion remains. Microsoft has spent about $261 billion on capital expenditure since the start of 2022. That is the scale of the bet against what the rest of the AI business currently brings in. And the one customer holding it up is walking further away every quarter. In October, Microsoft's stake in OpenAI dropped to 27% from 32.5%. In April the partnership was rewritten so OpenAI can sell its products across any cloud it likes, which is how Amazon got a seat at the table. The exclusivity that made this arrangement valuable is gone. The compute bill and the unpaid $6 billion are still on Microsoft's books. Nadella spent two years telling the market Microsoft built the largest AI business in software. The filing shows one client bought most of it, on credit, using money Microsoft partly supplied. So watch the next earnings call: If Microsoft puts a fresh total AI number back on the board, the business found customers beyond OpenAI. If you hear a lot about AI momentum and never hear what it adds up to, you already know why the number went missing. But nonetheless, how is something like this even legal?
0:56

Microsoft is deceiving you by inflating its AI empire with money it handed its OWN customer first. They sold Wall Street a $37 billion AI business, then went silent the moment its own filing showed where that money came from. The line sits in the annual report for fiscal 2026: Microsoft recorded $24.1 billion of revenue from commercial arrangements with OpenAI, including revenue sharing payments. If you run that figure against Microsoft's own AI disclosures you'll find that OpenAI made up more than half, and likely around 70%, of everything the company counts as AI sales. ONE customer. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed the figure covers all sales and revenue share from OpenAI. The 70% comes by assuming Microsoft's AI run rate kept growing at the 123% pace the company itself reported in March, which is the company's own optimistic math turned around on it. Now follow where that money starts: Microsoft has put around $12 billion into OpenAI since 2019. OpenAI spends its cash on computing power, and Microsoft is the cloud provider selling it. So the money leaves as an investment and comes back as an Azure bill. Microsoft then books that bill as AI revenue and shows it to investors as proof the AI business is "working." Microsoft invests in OpenAI -> OpenAI buys Microsoft compute -> Microsoft records the payment as AI revenue -> the AI growth story goes to Wall Street And a chunk of it never actually arrived. The same filing shows $6 billion of accounts receivable from OpenAI as of June 30. That is $6 billion of AI revenue Microsoft booked and had not been paid when the year closed. Now here's where it gets really concerning for anyone holding the stock... Microsoft has told the public how big its total AI business is exactly twice. Once for the quarter ending December 2024, when it said the unit was on pace for more than $13 billion a year. And once for the quarter ending March 2026, when Satya Nadella put it on pace for $37 billion. That $37 billion number went everywhere. It was the headline proof that Microsoft had won the AI race. Then fourth quarter earnings arrived, and Microsoft did NOT update it. The company that had been announcing the figure as its own scoreboard stopped announcing the figure. In the same stretch, the filing landed showing where most of it came from. So what is actually left underneath? The full year AI business ran near $34 billion. Take OpenAI out and roughly $10 billion remains. Microsoft has spent about $261 billion on capital expenditure since the start of 2022. That is the scale of the bet against what the rest of the AI business currently brings in. And the one customer holding it up is walking further away every quarter. In October, Microsoft's stake in OpenAI dropped to 27% from 32.5%. In April the partnership was rewritten so OpenAI can sell its products across any cloud it likes, which is how Amazon got a seat at the table. The exclusivity that made this arrangement valuable is gone. The compute bill and the unpaid $6 billion are still on Microsoft's books. Nadella spent two years telling the market Microsoft built the largest AI business in software. The filing shows one client bought most of it, on credit, using money Microsoft partly supplied. So watch the next earnings call: If Microsoft puts a fresh total AI number back on the board, the business found customers beyond OpenAI. If you hear a lot about AI momentum and never hear what it adds up to, you already know why the number went missing. But nonetheless, how is something like this even legal?

Ricardo

24,389 views • 3 months ago

man anthropic is absolutely cooking microsoft. claude now works natively in word, powerpoint and excel. thats 450M users but how the fuck did anthropic beat microsoft co-pilot? it gets worse - microsoft blew $13B creating co-pilot and owns 27% of openai yet no sign on chatgpt. - claude has access to SHARED context across excel, word and powerpoint. they know the footprint of microsoft's users - very valuable AI data. - only 15M microsoft users pay for copilot, so its clear they need to go model-agnostic - this is the 3rd major microsoft product to leverage claude (cowork and deep research are the other 2) very impressive execution from anthropic tbh, they are trying to be everywhere and anywhere - its working
0:57

man anthropic is absolutely cooking microsoft. claude now works natively in word, powerpoint and excel. thats 450M users but how the fuck did anthropic beat microsoft co-pilot? it gets worse - microsoft blew $13B creating co-pilot and owns 27% of openai yet no sign on chatgpt. - claude has access to SHARED context across excel, word and powerpoint. they know the footprint of microsoft's users - very valuable AI data. - only 15M microsoft users pay for copilot, so its clear they need to go model-agnostic - this is the 3rd major microsoft product to leverage claude (cowork and deep research are the other 2) very impressive execution from anthropic tbh, they are trying to be everywhere and anywhere - its working

Ejaaz

474,140 views • 7 months ago

Trump: Remember that I was the one that did it, OK? Somebody's going to walk into office and they're going to have the most successful country in history, and they're going to be bragging what a great job they did. We did it.
0:54

Trump: Remember that I was the one that did it, OK? Somebody's going to walk into office and they're going to have the most successful country in history, and they're going to be bragging what a great job they did. We did it.

Acyn

29,773 views • 4 months ago

Kutools for Excel — 300+ powerful features for Excel. See how it helps simplify repetitive tasks and save time. Watch the full video here: Via YouTube Microsoft Excel Microsoft365 Microsoft Microsoft Office
0:33

Kutools for Excel — 300+ powerful features for Excel. See how it helps simplify repetitive tasks and save time. Watch the full video here: Via YouTube Microsoft Excel Microsoft365 Microsoft Microsoft Office

ExtendOffice - Kutools for Excel, Outlook, Word

12,307 views • 5 months ago

The CEO of Microsoft AI just said on camera that most white collar work will be fully automated within 12 to 18 months. This isn't some random guy on a podcast. This is the person in charge of building the tools that will do it. And he's telling you the timeline out loud.
1:25

The CEO of Microsoft AI just said on camera that most white collar work will be fully automated within 12 to 18 months. This isn't some random guy on a podcast. This is the person in charge of building the tools that will do it. And he's telling you the timeline out loud.

LayoffHedge

208,540 views • 8 months ago

The owner of a real estate company thought it would be fun to build everyone their own tiny home as an office instead of the typical boring cubicles. He felt that it would be more private for them and it would be fun for the to customize and make it their own. When the workers get to work they seem to be at a home away from home. They are happier and more productive. Would you want to work in your own home office like this or should he just let them have cubicles like everyone else?
0:34

The owner of a real estate company thought it would be fun to build everyone their own tiny home as an office instead of the typical boring cubicles. He felt that it would be more private for them and it would be fun for the to customize and make it their own. When the workers get to work they seem to be at a home away from home. They are happier and more productive. Would you want to work in your own home office like this or should he just let them have cubicles like everyone else?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

3,502,559 views • 8 months ago

Jason Calacanis explains how Anthropic is building a Microsoft killer through SaaS bundling. Every software company you pay for right now just became a feature. @jason “I think Anthropic is building the Microsoft killer and every SaaS company killer by bundling.” “They launched today, an hour ago, a Zoom like product, a Zoom killer, if you will. Couple of days ago on November 10th, they released whiteboards and sheets, an Excel killer.” “They keep releasing product after product. I think they are doing the ultimate bundle, every single piece of software that you need.” “I think this is going to be the largest company in the world potentially if it continues at this pace where they can release new products and services and just attach them to your 20 to $50 a month subscription.” “Microsoft has to create a competing product and go head-to-head against them or they're going to lose the Office franchise.”
2:17

Jason Calacanis explains how Anthropic is building a Microsoft killer through SaaS bundling. Every software company you pay for right now just became a feature. @jason “I think Anthropic is building the Microsoft killer and every SaaS company killer by bundling.” “They launched today, an hour ago, a Zoom like product, a Zoom killer, if you will. Couple of days ago on November 10th, they released whiteboards and sheets, an Excel killer.” “They keep releasing product after product. I think they are doing the ultimate bundle, every single piece of software that you need.” “I think this is going to be the largest company in the world potentially if it continues at this pace where they can release new products and services and just attach them to your 20 to $50 a month subscription.” “Microsoft has to create a competing product and go head-to-head against them or they're going to lose the Office franchise.”

jay plemons

18,209 views • 1 day ago

Steve Ballmer sat in a golf club in 2023 and Charlie Munger, 99 years old and partner to Warren Buffett for 60 years, confronted him in front of a full room about why he had held his Microsoft stock for 34 years when every one of his executive partners had sold a 60 second exchange that captured the exact reason Ballmer is now worth more than Bill Gates The video is 60 seconds long and has already crossed 15 million views Munger looked at him in front of the whole room and said: "I know you're not that smart" Ballmer answered without pausing: "no, but I'm that loyal" Microsoft stock went flat for 13 straight years between 2000 and 2013. every analyst on Wall Street said sell. every executive partner Ballmer had at Microsoft did sell Ballmer did not sell a single share in 1980 Bill Gates called him at Stanford Business School and offered him 8 percent of a 24-person startup instead of the safe consulting path his father wanted. Ballmer took the equity in 2000 the dot-com bubble burst and Microsoft dropped over 60 percent in 18 months. every analyst said the party was over. Ballmer held every share in 2014 the Microsoft board pushed Ballmer out as CEO. he could have cashed the entire position on the way out. he held every share three decisions across 34 years. every one of them was Ballmer holding when the smart money was running that 8 percent he took in 1980 is now worth over $140 billion. Ballmer is personally worth more than Bill Gates today, because Gates gave most of his away and Ballmer never did intelligence tells you when to sell loyalty tells you when to hold the paycheck goes to the one who outsmarts the market the fortune goes to the one who outlasts it
0:59

Steve Ballmer sat in a golf club in 2023 and Charlie Munger, 99 years old and partner to Warren Buffett for 60 years, confronted him in front of a full room about why he had held his Microsoft stock for 34 years when every one of his executive partners had sold a 60 second exchange that captured the exact reason Ballmer is now worth more than Bill Gates The video is 60 seconds long and has already crossed 15 million views Munger looked at him in front of the whole room and said: "I know you're not that smart" Ballmer answered without pausing: "no, but I'm that loyal" Microsoft stock went flat for 13 straight years between 2000 and 2013. every analyst on Wall Street said sell. every executive partner Ballmer had at Microsoft did sell Ballmer did not sell a single share in 1980 Bill Gates called him at Stanford Business School and offered him 8 percent of a 24-person startup instead of the safe consulting path his father wanted. Ballmer took the equity in 2000 the dot-com bubble burst and Microsoft dropped over 60 percent in 18 months. every analyst said the party was over. Ballmer held every share in 2014 the Microsoft board pushed Ballmer out as CEO. he could have cashed the entire position on the way out. he held every share three decisions across 34 years. every one of them was Ballmer holding when the smart money was running that 8 percent he took in 1980 is now worth over $140 billion. Ballmer is personally worth more than Bill Gates today, because Gates gave most of his away and Ballmer never did intelligence tells you when to sell loyalty tells you when to hold the paycheck goes to the one who outsmarts the market the fortune goes to the one who outlasts it

MindArch

167,000 views • 1 month ago

We’re bringing the full power of Microsoft Office into the Copilot app, so you can go from initial idea to finished work all in one place, with the fidelity, performance, and collaboration you rely on. Looking forward to you giving it a try in Frontier soon. Learn more:
1:52

We’re bringing the full power of Microsoft Office into the Copilot app, so you can go from initial idea to finished work all in one place, with the fidelity, performance, and collaboration you rely on. Looking forward to you giving it a try in Frontier soon. Learn more:

Sumit Chauhan

43,337 views • 1 month ago