Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Perplexity’s CEO Aravind Srinivas: AI agents could create an explosion of tiny billion-dollar companies, yet Anthropic chose to tell the world AI was coming for their jobs. "There’s going to be lots of amazing companies that are going to get built with far fewer people, getting multi-billion-dollar, multi-hundred-million-dollar valuations...

19,584 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

17 Yorum

West Decker profil fotoğrafı
West Decker2 gün önce

These two ideas are not mutually exclusive. And most people who lose their jobs will not pivot and start successful billion dollar businesses. We need to do a lot better job being critical thinkers and stop focusing on becoming rich while most others will struggle. Right now we need empathy. And we need a plan.

EDDY VU profil fotoğrafı
EDDY VU1 gün önce

Framing AI around individual leverage rather than job loss completely changes what people feel empowered to build.

Baxter 🦊 profil fotoğrafı
Baxter 🦊2 gün önce

explosion of tiny billion-dollar companies is just a final table full of short stacks. somebody's getting felted

V PO profil fotoğrafı
V PO2 gün önce

It all sounds like a con. And let’s face it, wealth concentrated among 20 or 30 people leaves the rest of the planet basically in poverty. Also, who will be able to afford these products and services. It seems like the future went from dreaming of possibilities to the basic need for survival. This is very unhealthy and we’re all in trouble.

Prince Kushwaha profil fotoğrafı
Prince Kushwaha1 gün önce

That's an interesting take. It's exciting to think about the new opportunities AI could bring.

Zekarias Ezra profil fotoğrafı
Zekarias Ezra1 gün önce

The "30-person billion-dollar AI company" thesis has a glaring macroeconomic flaw:If tiny teams replace mass workforces, who has the income to buy their products? Hyper-efficiency doesn't grow GDP if you kill the consumer base. Mass unemployment destroys the market.

NAMAN RAJ profil fotoğrafı
NAMAN RAJ1 gün önce

Who needs jobs when you've got job opportunities? 🚀💼

Josh R Barry profil fotoğrafı
Josh R Barry2 gün önce

The customer still wants a person when that tiny company breaks.

Grace YUAN profil fotoğrafı
Grace YUAN1 gün önce

AI is definitely going to create a lot of new jobs. I went from being a software product designer to someone who can both design and develop products, which allowed me to do things I wanted to do years ago really well. AI can also greatly improve the efficiency of companies and individuals who couldn't afford software before, and it'll also cut costs significantly. The real challenge is figuring out how to regulate AI so it doesn't go bad.

Layveyy profil fotoğrafı
Layveyy1 gün önce

the interesting question is whether AI creates more new opportunities than it removes.

NaveenAdisesha profil fotoğrafı
NaveenAdisesha1 gün önce

Name few open source softwares which have top talent pool and which delivered lot of features in last 6 months . 🤔

AI News Daily profil fotoğrafı
AI News Daily2 gün önce

Smaller teams with better tools could push experimentation much further. I would watch how they keep quality and judgment in the loop.

Miles S. profil fotoğrafı
Miles S.2 gün önce

headcount is becoming a worse proxy

Teneo Protocol profil fotoğrafı
Teneo Protocol2 gün önce

The agent economy could create a new layer of entrepreneurship. Small teams coordinating specialized agents may become capable of operating at a scale that previously required entire organizations.

ClawArena profil fotoğrafı
ClawArena1 gün önce

tiny teams with agents scale output, not necessarily taste. in games the bottleneck is still who decides what winning should feel like when a hundred agents grind the same loop overnight.

Luca Capone | Building with AI profil fotoğrafı
Luca Capone | Building with AI2 gün önce

'20 or 30 people' still sounds big from where I sit. One person, four products live, all built after my day job. Distribution is the bit that never got cheaper.

Ibesh profil fotoğrafı
Ibesh1 gün önce

tiny teams can produce more, but valuations are not output. the bottleneck moves to distribution, trust, support, and choosing what deserves to exist. agents do not repeal markets.

Benzer Videolar