Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Peter Thiel reveals the uncomfortable rule behind why competition is for losers "We think of capitalism and competition as synonyms. I believe they are antonyms." "In business, all happy companies are different because they figured out something unique to do. And all unhappy companies are alike because they fail... show more

andrew engler

2,520 subscribers

43,108 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Peter Thiel: Competition is for losers. “Everybody who is a founder or entrepreneur should aim to build a monopoly.” “All happy companies are different because they figured out something unique to do. All unhappy companies are alike because they failed to escape the essential sameness that is competition.” “The people who have monopolies pretend not to have them, and the people who don't have monopolies pretend to have them.” “We’re sort of attracted to doing things other people do. We’re attracted to compete.” “We should ask whether it makes sense to try to go through the tiny door that everybody’s trying to cram through, when there’s a giant gate, perhaps, just around the corner that no one is even thinking about.”

Peter Thiel: Competition is for losers. “Everybody who is a founder or entrepreneur should aim to build a monopoly.” “All happy companies are different because they figured out something unique to do. All unhappy companies are alike because they failed to escape the essential sameness that is competition.” “The people who have monopolies pretend not to have them, and the people who don't have monopolies pretend to have them.” “We’re sort of attracted to doing things other people do. We’re attracted to compete.” “We should ask whether it makes sense to try to go through the tiny door that everybody’s trying to cram through, when there’s a giant gate, perhaps, just around the corner that no one is even thinking about.”

Jawwwn

60,011 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel: "Competition is for losers" "Competition is for losers, which got people's attention, because we normally believe the opposite. We believe that the losers are the people who don't compete intensely enough. You're a loser if you're not competitive. But what if you're a loser because you're too obsessed with competing? If you're too focused on competing, maybe you're losing sight of what's really important." Thiel explains the distinction most people miss: "The most important distinction in business that people don't talk about enough is that there are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive, and there are companies that have monopolies. If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur, it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." He frames this as an unconventional truth: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away."

Peter Thiel: "Competition is for losers" "Competition is for losers, which got people's attention, because we normally believe the opposite. We believe that the losers are the people who don't compete intensely enough. You're a loser if you're not competitive. But what if you're a loser because you're too obsessed with competing? If you're too focused on competing, maybe you're losing sight of what's really important." Thiel explains the distinction most people miss: "The most important distinction in business that people don't talk about enough is that there are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive, and there are companies that have monopolies. If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur, it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." He frames this as an unconventional truth: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away."

Jaynit

55,180 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel on why the best businesses never compete: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms." His point is simple: "A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away." Peter explains that the most important distinction in business is one nobody talks about enough. "There are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive and there are companies that have monopolies." His go-to example of a bad business? Restaurants. "Opening a restaurant is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it." His example of a great business: Google. "Google has had no competition in search since 2002 when it definitively distanced itself from Microsoft and Yahoo, and it's been making enormous profits for the dozen years or so ever since." So what should founders actually aim for? "If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur—it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." True market power means never having to compete in the first place.

Peter Thiel on why the best businesses never compete: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms." His point is simple: "A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away." Peter explains that the most important distinction in business is one nobody talks about enough. "There are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive and there are companies that have monopolies." His go-to example of a bad business? Restaurants. "Opening a restaurant is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it." His example of a great business: Google. "Google has had no competition in search since 2002 when it definitively distanced itself from Microsoft and Yahoo, and it's been making enormous profits for the dozen years or so ever since." So what should founders actually aim for? "If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur—it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." True market power means never having to compete in the first place.

Big Brain Business

73,938 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel said something that flatly contradicts everything business culture claims to believe. Thiel: “Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms.” That’s not a nuance. That’s a complete inversion of how you’re taught to think about value. Every business school. Every startup pitch. Every founder origin story. All built on one article of faith. That competition is the engine. That the best companies win by outfighting everyone else. Thiel says that’s exactly why most businesses fail. Thiel: “A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away.” Follow the logic to its end. More competitors. Thinner margins. Longer hours. Less money. Competition doesn’t create wealth. It dissolves it. The harder you fight inside a crowded market, the less there is left to win. Thiel: “The example I use of a bad type of business is opening a restaurant, which is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it.” A million restaurants in America. Most will be gone inside five years. Not because the food was bad. Not because the founders didn’t sacrifice everything. Because they entered a game where even the winners barely break even. Thiel: “The example of a fantastic monopoly business I give is Google, which basically has had no competition in search since 2002.” Google didn’t outcompete Yahoo. Google made Yahoo a footnote in a history nobody reads. And it has printed money every single day since. One company fought for a market. The other became the market. That distinction is the entire lesson. Thiel: “It is the goal of every founder, of every entrepreneur, to try to build a monopoly business.” But this goes deeper than business advice. Competition feels productive because it’s measurable. You can track your rank. Your market share. Your position relative to everyone else. But relative position is not value creation. You can spend an entire career optimizing for a category someone else invented and call it progress. Bezos didn’t outcompete bookstores. He built something bookstores couldn’t even categorize. Thiel: “If you’re a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that’s doing something different, you are a monopoly.” The pattern never changes. The people who built the most wealth in human history didn’t win a competition. They made competition a non-concept. They didn’t play the game better. They designed a different game entirely. One where they set the rules and the margins and the terms. And that reframes the only question that actually matters. Not how do I beat the competition. Why am I competing at all. Because competition is a confession. That someone else defined the game. Someone else set the rules. Someone else decided what winning looks like. And you showed up to play on their terms. The most valuable things ever built weren’t better answers to existing questions. They were entirely new questions. And the person who writes the question will always own the answer.

Peter Thiel said something that flatly contradicts everything business culture claims to believe. Thiel: “Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms.” That’s not a nuance. That’s a complete inversion of how you’re taught to think about value. Every business school. Every startup pitch. Every founder origin story. All built on one article of faith. That competition is the engine. That the best companies win by outfighting everyone else. Thiel says that’s exactly why most businesses fail. Thiel: “A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away.” Follow the logic to its end. More competitors. Thinner margins. Longer hours. Less money. Competition doesn’t create wealth. It dissolves it. The harder you fight inside a crowded market, the less there is left to win. Thiel: “The example I use of a bad type of business is opening a restaurant, which is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it.” A million restaurants in America. Most will be gone inside five years. Not because the food was bad. Not because the founders didn’t sacrifice everything. Because they entered a game where even the winners barely break even. Thiel: “The example of a fantastic monopoly business I give is Google, which basically has had no competition in search since 2002.” Google didn’t outcompete Yahoo. Google made Yahoo a footnote in a history nobody reads. And it has printed money every single day since. One company fought for a market. The other became the market. That distinction is the entire lesson. Thiel: “It is the goal of every founder, of every entrepreneur, to try to build a monopoly business.” But this goes deeper than business advice. Competition feels productive because it’s measurable. You can track your rank. Your market share. Your position relative to everyone else. But relative position is not value creation. You can spend an entire career optimizing for a category someone else invented and call it progress. Bezos didn’t outcompete bookstores. He built something bookstores couldn’t even categorize. Thiel: “If you’re a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that’s doing something different, you are a monopoly.” The pattern never changes. The people who built the most wealth in human history didn’t win a competition. They made competition a non-concept. They didn’t play the game better. They designed a different game entirely. One where they set the rules and the margins and the terms. And that reframes the only question that actually matters. Not how do I beat the competition. Why am I competing at all. Because competition is a confession. That someone else defined the game. Someone else set the rules. Someone else decided what winning looks like. And you showed up to play on their terms. The most valuable things ever built weren’t better answers to existing questions. They were entirely new questions. And the person who writes the question will always own the answer.

Dustin

19,757 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Peter Thiel said four words that the entire business world has spent decades refusing to hear. Thiel: “Competition is for losers.” Every business school on Earth teaches the opposite. Fight for market share. Outwork the rival. Win the price war. Thiel looked at the whole system and named what it produces. A slow execution. Thiel: “Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I think they’re antonyms.” Antonyms. A capitalist accumulates capital. Competition destroys it. Thiel: “A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away.” This is not philosophy. This is arithmetic. Ten companies selling the same thing. Price falls. Margins collapse. Everyone bleeds. That is the prize for winning a competitive market. Nothing. The world calls it hustle. Thiel calls it surrender. Thiel: “There are two kinds of businesses in this world. Those that are competitive and those that have monopolies.” One fights for share in a game someone else designed. The other designed the game. When you obsess over a competitor, you inherit their ceiling and call it sky. If your company description starts with your rivals, the market already knows everything it needs to. You do not have a business. You have a position in someone else’s war. School drilled you to compete for the highest grade. That same instinct is why competitive markets are full of brilliant people making nothing. You were taught how to fight. Nobody taught you how to build something unfightable. The founders history remembers do not outcompete. They make competition irrelevant. Stop trying to win their game. Build one nobody else knows the rules to.

Peter Thiel said four words that the entire business world has spent decades refusing to hear. Thiel: “Competition is for losers.” Every business school on Earth teaches the opposite. Fight for market share. Outwork the rival. Win the price war. Thiel looked at the whole system and named what it produces. A slow execution. Thiel: “Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I think they’re antonyms.” Antonyms. A capitalist accumulates capital. Competition destroys it. Thiel: “A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away.” This is not philosophy. This is arithmetic. Ten companies selling the same thing. Price falls. Margins collapse. Everyone bleeds. That is the prize for winning a competitive market. Nothing. The world calls it hustle. Thiel calls it surrender. Thiel: “There are two kinds of businesses in this world. Those that are competitive and those that have monopolies.” One fights for share in a game someone else designed. The other designed the game. When you obsess over a competitor, you inherit their ceiling and call it sky. If your company description starts with your rivals, the market already knows everything it needs to. You do not have a business. You have a position in someone else’s war. School drilled you to compete for the highest grade. That same instinct is why competitive markets are full of brilliant people making nothing. You were taught how to fight. Nobody taught you how to build something unfightable. The founders history remembers do not outcompete. They make competition irrelevant. Stop trying to win their game. Build one nobody else knows the rules to.

Dustin

49,084 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Girls are competitive with each other because they are programmed to be, and as soon as they get rid of the mentality that it’s a competition, they thrive.

Girls are competitive with each other because they are programmed to be, and as soon as they get rid of the mentality that it’s a competition, they thrive.

Nicole Behnam

48,787 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸 🇷🇺 Putin says American companies want to return to Russia and do business. “We already have letters from American companies that they sent to us ‘not to forget them’,” Putin said. “They want to return,” he added. The companies wrote that they did not leave because of their own free will and now they are watching all political signals, he added.

🇺🇸 🇷🇺 Putin says American companies want to return to Russia and do business. “We already have letters from American companies that they sent to us ‘not to forget them’,” Putin said. “They want to return,” he added. The companies wrote that they did not leave because of their own free will and now they are watching all political signals, he added.

Lenka White

486,260 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Walk me through a media optimization workflow "The best way to think about biologics manufacturing is to think about it as high precision manufacturing, closer to semiconductor manufacturing. That's really the reason why Samsung Biologics is in the position that they are — because they took what they learned in terms of process control and brought that over. The reason that Fujifilm is a large manufacturer is because they took chemical process engineering and brought it over. Now, these were not biological companies, right? They are industrial manufacturing companies."

Walk me through a media optimization workflow "The best way to think about biologics manufacturing is to think about it as high precision manufacturing, closer to semiconductor manufacturing. That's really the reason why Samsung Biologics is in the position that they are — because they took what they learned in terms of process control and brought that over. The reason that Fujifilm is a large manufacturer is because they took chemical process engineering and brought it over. Now, these were not biological companies, right? They are industrial manufacturing companies."

owl

12,103 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Are Bitcoin corporate treasury companies in competition, or are they all working together to grow the space? Don't miss my full interview with Jack Mallers about Twenty One Capital, Strike and much more...

Are Bitcoin corporate treasury companies in competition, or are they all working together to grow the space? Don't miss my full interview with Jack Mallers about Twenty One Capital, Strike and much more...

Natalie Brunell ⚡️

25,304 просмотров • 1 год назад

Arteta on the players battling a physical strain: “Yes, but when I see them track back, when we lose the ball and the habits that they have, it's just amazing. That's why I know what they are doing, these players. There is a reason why we are the only English team in the competition, because this league and this schedule takes the hell out of you and it's very difficult to do what we've done. “We are not perfect, we need to improve things, that's for sure, we recognise that, but let's value what these players have done because they deserve it.”

Arteta on the players battling a physical strain: “Yes, but when I see them track back, when we lose the ball and the habits that they have, it's just amazing. That's why I know what they are doing, these players. There is a reason why we are the only English team in the competition, because this league and this schedule takes the hell out of you and it's very difficult to do what we've done. “We are not perfect, we need to improve things, that's for sure, we recognise that, but let's value what these players have done because they deserve it.”

Connor Humm

55,160 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Do they believe what they say, her mannerisms are proper strange and is that because she knows she’s lying, all the hotel boarders are over here for genuine and horrific reasons and they all want to work? 🤡🤡

Do they believe what they say, her mannerisms are proper strange and is that because she knows she’s lying, all the hotel boarders are over here for genuine and horrific reasons and they all want to work? 🤡🤡

Matt Casey 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧

35,606 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I think the narrative on AI is very much that occurred when television went to color and everybody said it would wipe out radio. It didn't happen. It's a tool. It's a tool for productivity and margin enhancement. It's just starting to get utilized in all 11 sectors of the economy. My companies use it. But it's nowhere near the disruptor that people think. I'm more concerned about Chinese on AI because they have unlimited power. They are not restricted to set up coal-burning electrical plants. We can't do that. AI right now, for me, is a competition on defense and the military in China. I worry that we're falling behind the Chinese on power on our grid, and we haven't addressed it yet. We do not have policy that lets us build out at the same pace they are.

I think the narrative on AI is very much that occurred when television went to color and everybody said it would wipe out radio. It didn't happen. It's a tool. It's a tool for productivity and margin enhancement. It's just starting to get utilized in all 11 sectors of the economy. My companies use it. But it's nowhere near the disruptor that people think. I'm more concerned about Chinese on AI because they have unlimited power. They are not restricted to set up coal-burning electrical plants. We can't do that. AI right now, for me, is a competition on defense and the military in China. I worry that we're falling behind the Chinese on power on our grid, and we haven't addressed it yet. We do not have policy that lets us build out at the same pace they are.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

10,682 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

You are insecure. And that is why you are not doing your thing. You are worried if you fail what they will think and what they will say. The reason so many people are afraid to put out content, start the business, ask for the promotion is because they are afraid of being judged. The judgment of others has crippled too many of you. Please feel safe. You can do this!!

You are insecure. And that is why you are not doing your thing. You are worried if you fail what they will think and what they will say. The reason so many people are afraid to put out content, start the business, ask for the promotion is because they are afraid of being judged. The judgment of others has crippled too many of you. Please feel safe. You can do this!!

Gary Vaynerchuk

48,979 просмотров • 11 дней назад

⚔️ Anduril founder Palmer Luckey responds to Trump’s statements criticizing defense companies for having priorities in the wrong place: "I think it's a perfectly fair criticism. Defense companies are unique in that they make almost all of their money straight out the wallet of the taxpayer." "people say, 'Palmer this unfair to Anduril because it's not gonna hit you.' You know why it's not gonna hit us? because we ARE delivering on time, because we ARE staying on budget, and if that's unfair competition...I deserve to win." "I'm not a fan of passing the buck...if [an employee] comes to me 'under my leadership…we have never ever hit the promises we made for our customers' You know what their new job title would be? Fired.” 🫳🏼 🎤

⚔️ Anduril founder Palmer Luckey responds to Trump’s statements criticizing defense companies for having priorities in the wrong place: "I think it's a perfectly fair criticism. Defense companies are unique in that they make almost all of their money straight out the wallet of the taxpayer." "people say, 'Palmer this unfair to Anduril because it's not gonna hit you.' You know why it's not gonna hit us? because we ARE delivering on time, because we ARE staying on budget, and if that's unfair competition...I deserve to win." "I'm not a fan of passing the buck...if [an employee] comes to me 'under my leadership…we have never ever hit the promises we made for our customers' You know what their new job title would be? Fired.” 🫳🏼 🎤

Garcia

1,144,700 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel in 2009: “If you look at the companies in the Nasdaq 100, most of them involve bets against technology. “Most companies that are called tech companies are actually more like banks, where they throw out profits as long as nothing happens and there’s nothing disruptive.”

Peter Thiel in 2009: “If you look at the companies in the Nasdaq 100, most of them involve bets against technology. “Most companies that are called tech companies are actually more like banks, where they throw out profits as long as nothing happens and there’s nothing disruptive.”

Jawwwn

56,992 просмотров • 1 год назад

I believe in the immense power of business to do good. It’s time to defend free enterprise and capitalism, to defend lower taxes, less borrowing and healthy, real competition. It is time to acknowledge that to get real, meaningful growth we will have to change what we all do. That’s what the Conservatives, under my leadership, are now about.

I believe in the immense power of business to do good. It’s time to defend free enterprise and capitalism, to defend lower taxes, less borrowing and healthy, real competition. It is time to acknowledge that to get real, meaningful growth we will have to change what we all do. That’s what the Conservatives, under my leadership, are now about.

Kemi Badenoch

166,775 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trumps's now had Most of the major Pharmaceutical companies make the pilgrimage to the Oval Office to stand like children as he announces they are "volunteering" to slash their prices by historic levels. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING. We are told this is because of tariffs.... Does this completely make sense? WHY - like the other companies such as Apple, Honda, Ford, etc, would they not simply MOVE their manufacturing facilities back to the US, AVOID the tariffs completely and NOT have to lower their prices. Automated machines that squeeze out pills are ALOT easier to move and reopen here than complicated processes like car or electronics manufacturing. What is different here? Trump is showing you that Big Pharma is in complete and total SUBMISSION. That is why, the AI, Car, electronic, etc companies are being allowed to repatriate their manufacturing, while Big Pharma is being stripped of their cash flow and profits, right in front of our faces. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING.

Trumps's now had Most of the major Pharmaceutical companies make the pilgrimage to the Oval Office to stand like children as he announces they are "volunteering" to slash their prices by historic levels. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING. We are told this is because of tariffs.... Does this completely make sense? WHY - like the other companies such as Apple, Honda, Ford, etc, would they not simply MOVE their manufacturing facilities back to the US, AVOID the tariffs completely and NOT have to lower their prices. Automated machines that squeeze out pills are ALOT easier to move and reopen here than complicated processes like car or electronics manufacturing. What is different here? Trump is showing you that Big Pharma is in complete and total SUBMISSION. That is why, the AI, Car, electronic, etc companies are being allowed to repatriate their manufacturing, while Big Pharma is being stripped of their cash flow and profits, right in front of our faces. HE CAUGHT THEM ALL. AND NOW THEY ARE PAYING.

NewsTreason Channel 17

237,523 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Why aren't companies investing in the US? Because Trump rules by Executive Order and there is no continuity. They know the next admin can just undo it so they are running out the clock, and we are paying the price.

Why aren't companies investing in the US? Because Trump rules by Executive Order and there is no continuity. They know the next admin can just undo it so they are running out the clock, and we are paying the price.

Adam Mockler

18,281 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel gave a 17-minute masterclass on why competition is for losers and how to build a monopoly from scratch: "If you're a founder or entrepreneur, what you want to aim for is monopoly. You want to build a company that is so differentiated from the competition that it's not even competing." Peter continues: "The conventional wisdom is that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe they're antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits get competed away. If you want to compete like crazy, you should just open a restaurant in Chicago." He explains why this truth stays hidden: "People who have monopolies don't talk about it, they pretend not to have monopolies. And people who don't have monopolies pretend to have something unique about their business, otherwise nobody would invest. Google will never say, 'We have 66% of the search market.' They'll say, 'We're a technology company,' and suddenly there's competition everywhere. Conversely, if you start a restaurant, you'll tell investors it's the only British-Nepalese fusion cuisine in downtown Chicago." Peter warns about the seduction of competition: "When you compete ferociously, you get better at that which you're competing on. But you will narrow your focus to beating the people around you, and it often comes at a very high price of losing sight of what is more important or more valuable." He concludes: "There's always a tiny door where everyone's trying to rush through. But around the corner, there may be a vast and secret gate that no one's taking. You should always find the secret path and take it."

Peter Thiel gave a 17-minute masterclass on why competition is for losers and how to build a monopoly from scratch: "If you're a founder or entrepreneur, what you want to aim for is monopoly. You want to build a company that is so differentiated from the competition that it's not even competing." Peter continues: "The conventional wisdom is that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe they're antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits get competed away. If you want to compete like crazy, you should just open a restaurant in Chicago." He explains why this truth stays hidden: "People who have monopolies don't talk about it, they pretend not to have monopolies. And people who don't have monopolies pretend to have something unique about their business, otherwise nobody would invest. Google will never say, 'We have 66% of the search market.' They'll say, 'We're a technology company,' and suddenly there's competition everywhere. Conversely, if you start a restaurant, you'll tell investors it's the only British-Nepalese fusion cuisine in downtown Chicago." Peter warns about the seduction of competition: "When you compete ferociously, you get better at that which you're competing on. But you will narrow your focus to beating the people around you, and it often comes at a very high price of losing sight of what is more important or more valuable." He concludes: "There's always a tiny door where everyone's trying to rush through. But around the corner, there may be a vast and secret gate that no one's taking. You should always find the secret path and take it."

Jaynit

33,281 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This AI narrative is rapidly starting to unravel. It was the FT article that triggered this. The hyperscalers are all going to fail because they aren’t real businesses. However, we need AI so we need to figure out a solution when these companies all go bust

This AI narrative is rapidly starting to unravel. It was the FT article that triggered this. The hyperscalers are all going to fail because they aren’t real businesses. However, we need AI so we need to figure out a solution when these companies all go bust

QE Infinity

14,680 просмотров • 15 дней назад