正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Pfizer hid deaths, lied about transmission, compelling the government to grant EUA to their product under false claims. Brook Jackson 💜 saw this happening and reported it… for that, she was fired. Closing statement from Warner Mendenhall today:

73,098 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's lawyer: "Bobby Kennedy knows all about the Pfizer [Covid-jab] fraud...he's the [DOJ's client] in this case...We...appeal to [him & the admin] to change its position on this case" Note RFKJr.'s called the C19 jabs "mass murder." See tweet 2 This clip of Warner Mendenhall (Warner Mendenhall), an activist, citizen, and lawyer representing Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜), is taken from an interview with Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (Mary Talley Bowden MD) posted to Rumble on October 1, 2025. For reference, Jackson is a whistleblower suing Pfizer and her former employer, Ventavia Research Group, in Federal court under the False Claims Act for fraud she witnessed during the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA clinical trials in September 2020. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So, you know, a lot of people talk about the EUA and some other issues, but fundamentally, Pfizer contracted for a safe and effective vaccine for COVID-19. That is far from what they delivered. On top of that, they were supposed to, and we can talk about this in a minute, they were supposed to deliver this drug following current good manufacturing practices. It's right in the contracts. And they didn't do that either. And we can go into that issue. "But what happened in the process of litigating this case is the federal government decided that this case somehow was contrary to the public health policy of the United States. And it came in and asserted that under the Biden administration. And the judge dismissed it. So now it's on appeal. "They had no good cause to dismiss Brook Jackson's case. None whatsoever. They couldn't. There is a sort of a standard at DOJ in terms of when you would step in to dismiss one of these cases. They didn't meet any of those standards. They couldn't prove any good cause. But the judge went ahead and allowed the federal government to step in and dismiss the case and stop our litigation and stop our discovery against Pfizer, just based on the federal government say-so. "We are still, and we were hopeful, when the administration changed in January that we would have a change in position, within this administration. And certainly Bobby Kennedy knows all about the Pfizer fraud, and he is the client of the DOJ in this case. So we are, you know, we continue to appeal to Bobby and the administration to change a position on this case and let us do the work. We're willing to do the work for the American people to get the discovery and find out everything that that Pfizer did."

Sense Receptor

62,419 次观看 • 11 个月前

Jillian Michaels: “Should there be a Nuremberg-style trial for Covid-era crimes?” Dr. Mary Bowden: “Yes.” “But I don’t think it will happen … during Trump’s term.” “You see Trump with [Pfizer CEO] Bourla in the Oval Office.” “Now, there’s two big lawsuits that give me hope.” “The first one is Brook Jackson, who was a whistleblower.” “She was overseeing the research at Pfizer at one of their labs, and she noticed all these issues going on.” “They were unblinding the patients, they weren’t following the protocols that were set out for the research.” “When she reported it, she got fired.” “She is suing Pfizer.” “It’s a RICO case, a fraud case, and if it’s successful, it could be huge.” “It could take down Pfizer.” “The problem is Pam Bondi is blocking it—trying to get the case dismissed.” “There’s also another case, and people need to know this.” “If you think you were injured by these shots … and you report it to the doctor that gave you the shot, they are legally obligated to report that injury to VAERS.” “If they don’t, you can sue them, and you have until probably 2029 to do this.” “Deb Conrad was a physician assistant at Rochester Hospital. She was reporting injuries to VAERS, and she got fired for reporting too many, and she is suing.” “It’s made it past the motion to dismiss. It’s in discovery.” “If that sets a good precedent, then people can open the floodgates.” Mary Talley Bowden MD Jillian Michaels Brook Jackson 💜

Holden Culotta

100,151 次观看 • 8 个月前

Pfizer whistleblower's lawyer: "If people can't get justice [in court] they're going to take justice into their own hands &...the PREP Act strip[s] us of our ability to go to court...creating a pathway...[for] violence...as people can't find justice for their...dead children" This clip of Warner Mendenhall (Warner Mendenhall), an activist, citizen, and lawyer representing Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜), is taken from an interview with Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (Mary Talley Bowden MD) posted to Rumble on October 1, 2025. For reference, Jackson is a whistleblower suing Pfizer and her former employer, Ventavia Research Group, in Federal court under the False Claims Act for fraud she witnessed during the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA clinical trials in September 2020. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "You know, what the court system does that I don't think most people realize is it's a way to mediate violence in society. And the problem is, if people can't get justice, they're going to take justice into their own hands. And I think that's forgotten when we have laws like the PREP Act that just strip of. Strip us of our ability to go to court. You are actually creating, a pathway that's going to cause more violence in society. "As people can't find justice for their dead loved ones and their dead children, they're going to take. They're going to take it into their own hands. You know, why does Fauci have security? Because there are thousands and thousands of people very angry at him who cannot get justice in the courts. "And we see that everywhere in our society. I mean, I see hospital security really getting beefed up. Why? Because, you can't find justice against these hospitals. We just tried a case, you know, in June. It had a bad outcome, in my view. And it's very difficult to get to court in the first place, then to find justice. And you have very, very frustrated parents and family members, that they need to see a pathway to, get justice for the deaths and injuries of their loved ones."

Sense Receptor

32,299 次观看 • 11 个月前