Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Pfizer Under Question Watch as I question Pfizer representatives last night in a Senate Hearing. The company was very reluctant to attend the committee hearing and also reluctant to supply a straight answer, automatically falling back on their 'safe and effective' mantra to dodge answering the question. Already, this... show more
510,009 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
9 Yorum
It should be illegal for them to not answer the question.
Very well done, sir! One follow a question that I would like to have seen asked: If these vaccines were so thoroughly studied and tested and had been deemed so incredibly safe and effective, why was there an indemnity at all? Also, are there any countries that Pfizer will not sell its vaccines to who disallowed any indemnification? Just for fun. these two videos are from an FDA Zoom meeting when they were discussing emergency use authorization of the vaccines for innocent children. Yes, they voted unanimously to approve. Mind-numbing.
Well done, @MRobertsQLD! There is no immunity for intention to harm, that is more than obvious.
My son got Myocarditis soon after his 2nd Pfizer jab and also struggling with random inflammatory issues that come and go to various parts of his body.
Senator Roberts 🙏 and gratitude.
Thankyou Senator
Wow a real senator. Not like Liberals Labour Teal or Green. A corrupt UniParty
It is so frustrating to witness how you ask one thing and he answers something that has no correlation to the question. He should be held in contempt.
Good work Senator! Their responses are infuriating.
![PFIZER IS IN BIG TROUBLE. NEW interview with Kris Kobach, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, who is suing Pfizer, along with 5 x other American States. He mentions they knew 10% of women had miscarriages: "Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women and they had information in their possession not only of of causing you know grave problems for pregnant rats but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases" TRANSCRIPT FOR CLIP: NEWSMAX "You're suing Pfizer for misleading claims on the covid vaccine sir round of applause for you on this what's this about and what's your case" KRIS KOBACK "Well the case is that Pfizer violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act and by the way all 50 states have some version of a consumer Protection act and while the federal government gave all the vaccine manufacturers immunity from normal tort suits, where someone who's injured would sue the company seeking damages for their injury, the federal government did not give the vaccine manufacturers license to misrepresent or state things that they knew to be false when trying to push their product, and that's what this lawsuit is about" "[Pfizer] made multiple misrepresentations, including saying it was safe for pregnant women, when Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women. And they had information in their possession not only of of causing, you know grave problems for pregnant rats, but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications, including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases..... just think about that a person dies in every miscarriage and yet they proceeded to advertise it as safe for pregnant women". This lawsuit also highlights the amount of ignorance within other government departments, that are still pushing the "safe and effective" narrative on a Global scale. Add on top of the that the more recent accumulating evidence of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, and you have a ticking time bomb for the Pharmaceutical industry](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1845989916343521522/ext_tw_video_thumb/1845985675444998145/pu/img/8bd7-TYO6yUIGfAB.jpg)
![Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's lawyer: "Bobby Kennedy knows all about the Pfizer [Covid-jab] fraud...he's the [DOJ's client] in this case...We...appeal to [him & the admin] to change its position on this case" Note RFKJr.'s called the C19 jabs "mass murder." See tweet 2 This clip of Warner Mendenhall (Warner Mendenhall), an activist, citizen, and lawyer representing Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜), is taken from an interview with Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (Mary Talley Bowden MD) posted to Rumble on October 1, 2025. For reference, Jackson is a whistleblower suing Pfizer and her former employer, Ventavia Research Group, in Federal court under the False Claims Act for fraud she witnessed during the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA clinical trials in September 2020. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So, you know, a lot of people talk about the EUA and some other issues, but fundamentally, Pfizer contracted for a safe and effective vaccine for COVID-19. That is far from what they delivered. On top of that, they were supposed to, and we can talk about this in a minute, they were supposed to deliver this drug following current good manufacturing practices. It's right in the contracts. And they didn't do that either. And we can go into that issue. "But what happened in the process of litigating this case is the federal government decided that this case somehow was contrary to the public health policy of the United States. And it came in and asserted that under the Biden administration. And the judge dismissed it. So now it's on appeal. "They had no good cause to dismiss Brook Jackson's case. None whatsoever. They couldn't. There is a sort of a standard at DOJ in terms of when you would step in to dismiss one of these cases. They didn't meet any of those standards. They couldn't prove any good cause. But the judge went ahead and allowed the federal government to step in and dismiss the case and stop our litigation and stop our discovery against Pfizer, just based on the federal government say-so. "We are still, and we were hopeful, when the administration changed in January that we would have a change in position, within this administration. And certainly Bobby Kennedy knows all about the Pfizer fraud, and he is the client of the DOJ in this case. So we are, you know, we continue to appeal to Bobby and the administration to change a position on this case and let us do the work. We're willing to do the work for the American people to get the discovery and find out everything that that Pfizer did."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1973493529055011260/amplify_video_thumb/1973489675093659648/img/qZuPOndqUMfSjgm4.jpg)
![So Pfizer gets away with the "Bait and Switch"? What's the chances that after President Trump just secured a monumental deal with Pfizer for better drug pricing across America, that they'll be looking closely at how Pfizer injected the World with an mRNA product different to that which was trialled? Or Pfizer knew this would buy themselves protection? Or what we know about Pfizer's mRNA harms was used by the administration as a negotiating tool? Kevin McKernan - "[Pfizer] changed [the process when they injected] the rest of the World". Kevin McKernan, genomics expert: "This bait and switch is very important for you to understand [because] the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field [with] these injections".](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1973115453238288395/amplify_video_thumb/1973102200886009859/img/ChGuJLoqBVGv0kU7.jpg)
