Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Physicians who prescribe ivermectin for Covid-19.

557,278 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля MPC
MPC3 лет назад

No, this is far more scientific compared to thier evidence for ivm

Фото профиля Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea3 лет назад

☠️

Фото профиля OldStockFemale-NoGenders🤐UnacceptableFringe
OldStockFemale-NoGenders🤐UnacceptableFringe3 лет назад

This is brilliant, like homeopathy: oh the little sugar pill healed my sore throat in 6 days!

Фото профиля Robert B
Robert B3 лет назад

@WilliamWilde2 Wow that may actually be the best description ever.

Фото профиля Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea3 лет назад

@WilliamWilde2 👍

Фото профиля StereoMatch
StereoMatch3 лет назад

Which studies have convinced you of "zero effect" for prophylaxis and post-day8 anosmia reversal Or are you extrapolating "mortality benefit" studies to conclude "zero effect"? Is that not overreach?

Фото профиля Bob McCullough
Bob McCullough3 лет назад

This is a variant of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Shoot a bunch of holes at a blank target paper. Red cIrcle the area with the most holes & call bullseyes.

Фото профиля Stephen Fullington
Stephen Fullington3 лет назад

Definitely a good idea to take Covid advice from a psychologist.

Фото профиля Claudine 🇨🇦
Claudine 🇨🇦3 лет назад

Hey that's the Montreal subway system

Фото профиля hilljack
hilljack3 лет назад

I typically don't get my medical advice from a psychologist.

Похожие видео

The Story of Ivermectin — From Nobel Prize Winner to NIH Censorship: How a $3 Life-Saving Drug Was Sidelined by Anthony Fauci and Big Pharma during Covid-19: The discovery of ivermectin in 1970 led to a Nobel Prize-winning treatment for river blindness. By 2020, billions of doses had been safely administered worldwide, and it was on WHO's essential medicines list. During the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers found ivermectin showed promise in lab studies. Multiple observational studies and trials worldwide reported positive outcomes in various countries. Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, a group of ICU doctors, physicians and former journalists, compiled evidence from 30+ studies showing ivermectin's effectiveness against COVID-19. They presented this data to a Senate committee in December 2020. The World Health Organization recommended against Remdesivir use, citing no evidence of improved survival. Despite this, Fauci and the NIH panel continued recommending the $3,100 treatment while not recommending evaluation of the effective studies of ivermectin, resulting in the deaths of countless innocent people who were forced into to Anthony Fauci's Remdesivir and ventilator protocols for hospital patients. Documented financial disclosures had shown seven NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel members received support from Gilead Sciences, maker of remdesivir. Two panel chairs had financial ties to Gilead. Northern India's experience even offered a very compelling case study - after implementing widespread ivermectin use in August 2020, their COVID-19 deaths dropped to near zero by January 2021. In August 2021, the FDA launched a relentless campaign on social media to discourage the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19, famously tweeting "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it." The $cientific community, Fake News Media and health organizations such as the NIH, FDA, and WHO all rallied together in a multifaceted propaganda war against citizens worldwide to prevent them from using ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment. Crimes Against Humanity

Bridgett Fertig

13,148 просмотров • 22 дней назад