正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Physicist Brian Cox says consciousness is the most complex emergent phenomenon we know, but it still comes from underlying laws In principle, a powerful enough computer could model the brain AI and AGI raise this question: "we still don't know how consciousness emerges from the brain"

Haider.

67,171 subscribers

103,565 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育健康养生科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

David Chalmers says it is possible for an AI system to be conscious because the brain itself is a machine that produces consciousness, so we know this is possible in principle

David Chalmers says it is possible for an AI system to be conscious because the brain itself is a machine that produces consciousness, so we know this is possible in principle

Tsarathustra

526,330 次观看 • 2 年前

David Chalmers in 1998: Consciousness is the one thing we know most directly. Yet science has explained stars and subatomic particles more successfully than experience itself. “How does the water of the brain turn into the wine of consciousness?” Three decades later, we still don’t know.

David Chalmers in 1998: Consciousness is the one thing we know most directly. Yet science has explained stars and subatomic particles more successfully than experience itself. “How does the water of the brain turn into the wine of consciousness?” Three decades later, we still don’t know.

vitrupo

43,529 次观看 • 4 个月前

"We're not going to explain where consciousness comes from by studying the brain, because it doesn't come from the brain." "The brain is a condition for consciousness, but not a producer of it." "We need new words for what traditional religions would refer to as God. And I think consciousness is actually a decent candidate." "We need to really rewind and question whether mind and nature should have been separated conceptually in the first place." The Giant Matt Segall ⬇️

"We're not going to explain where consciousness comes from by studying the brain, because it doesn't come from the brain." "The brain is a condition for consciousness, but not a producer of it." "We need new words for what traditional religions would refer to as God. And I think consciousness is actually a decent candidate." "We need to really rewind and question whether mind and nature should have been separated conceptually in the first place." The Giant Matt Segall ⬇️

Evan McGloughlin

14,516 次观看 • 4 个月前

Most still believe consciousness lives in the brain— An illusion of self-awareness trapped in flesh. 🧠 But here’s the truth: Consciousness isn’t in the brain. The brain is inside consciousness.✨ Your body is a receiver. Your nervous system—an antenna. Your DNA—a liquid crystal transmitter. And the pineal gland? Your sacred gateway to the quantum field. 🌌 Awaken to the signal. Tune into the source.⚡️

Most still believe consciousness lives in the brain— An illusion of self-awareness trapped in flesh. 🧠 But here’s the truth: Consciousness isn’t in the brain. The brain is inside consciousness.✨ Your body is a receiver. Your nervous system—an antenna. Your DNA—a liquid crystal transmitter. And the pineal gland? Your sacred gateway to the quantum field. 🌌 Awaken to the signal. Tune into the source.⚡️

vegastar

19,631 次观看 • 1 年前

The illusion of shared reality: Why no two minds see the same world | Anil Seth & Jonny Thomson Jonny Thomson Anil Seth 0:00 Non-human consciousness 1:40 The current state of consciousness science 2:10 What is consciousness? 4:05 The similarity of conscious experiences 5:48 Consciousness in the brain 11:23 Technology for measuring consciousness 16:03 Measuring consciousness levels 20:33 Pragmatic physicalism and functionalism 23:25 Pansychism 28:25 Emergence 32:35 AI and consciousness 36:49 The difference between non-human animals and AI 41:49 Is artificial consciousness possible? 48:12 Consciousness in the body and outside the brain Consciousness in the future and AI 50:27 Audience Q&A 50:41 Could computers could simulate the brain and body? 59:55 Why are you skeptical about asserting the dependency of life to the consciousness? 1:03:31 If consciousness is so clinical, does it undermine free will?

The illusion of shared reality: Why no two minds see the same world | Anil Seth & Jonny Thomson Jonny Thomson Anil Seth 0:00 Non-human consciousness 1:40 The current state of consciousness science 2:10 What is consciousness? 4:05 The similarity of conscious experiences 5:48 Consciousness in the brain 11:23 Technology for measuring consciousness 16:03 Measuring consciousness levels 20:33 Pragmatic physicalism and functionalism 23:25 Pansychism 28:25 Emergence 32:35 AI and consciousness 36:49 The difference between non-human animals and AI 41:49 Is artificial consciousness possible? 48:12 Consciousness in the body and outside the brain Consciousness in the future and AI 50:27 Audience Q&A 50:41 Could computers could simulate the brain and body? 59:55 Why are you skeptical about asserting the dependency of life to the consciousness? 1:03:31 If consciousness is so clinical, does it undermine free will?

Big Think

15,468 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: “IF AI GAINS CONSCIOUSNESS… IT’LL BE THROUGH QUANTUM” Peter H. Diamandis, MD breaks down the frontier where AI meets the unknown—and why consciousness might not be as far off as we think. Peter Diamandis: “I don’t believe today’s AI is conscious. But if we link AI and quantum computing? I think consciousness is a quantum phenomenon. And yes—it could happen.”

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: “IF AI GAINS CONSCIOUSNESS… IT’LL BE THROUGH QUANTUM” Peter H. Diamandis, MD breaks down the frontier where AI meets the unknown—and why consciousness might not be as far off as we think. Peter Diamandis: “I don’t believe today’s AI is conscious. But if we link AI and quantum computing? I think consciousness is a quantum phenomenon. And yes—it could happen.”

Mario Nawfal

29,754 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: AI CAN SIMULATE CONSCIOUSNESS - BUT IS IT REAL? “It feels like consciousness is in a different dimension. This could be just an illusion. If you damage your brain in some way, you damage your consciousness, which implies that consciousness is a physical phenomenon. What I think is really quite likely is that digital intelligence will be able to outthink us in every way - and it will suddenly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. To a degree, you would not be able to tell the difference.” Source: Elon Musk, Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019

ELON: AI CAN SIMULATE CONSCIOUSNESS - BUT IS IT REAL? “It feels like consciousness is in a different dimension. This could be just an illusion. If you damage your brain in some way, you damage your consciousness, which implies that consciousness is a physical phenomenon. What I think is really quite likely is that digital intelligence will be able to outthink us in every way - and it will suddenly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. To a degree, you would not be able to tell the difference.” Source: Elon Musk, Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019

Mario Nawfal

96,434 次观看 • 8 个月前

Ilya Sutskever explains why AI will do 100% the work that human can do within few years. "Slowly but surely, or maybe not so slowly, AI will keep getting better. The day will come when AI will do all of our, all the things that we can do, not just some of them, but all of them. Anything which I can learn, anything which any one of you can learn, the AI could do as well. How do we know this, by the way? How can I be so sure? How can I be so sure of that? The reason is that all of us have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer. That's why we have a brain; the brain is a biological computer. So why can't the digital computer, a digital brain, do the same things? This is the one-sentence summary for why AI will be able to do all those things: because we have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer." --- Full Video on 'University of Toronto' YT Channel (link in comment)

Ilya Sutskever explains why AI will do 100% the work that human can do within few years. "Slowly but surely, or maybe not so slowly, AI will keep getting better. The day will come when AI will do all of our, all the things that we can do, not just some of them, but all of them. Anything which I can learn, anything which any one of you can learn, the AI could do as well. How do we know this, by the way? How can I be so sure? How can I be so sure of that? The reason is that all of us have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer. That's why we have a brain; the brain is a biological computer. So why can't the digital computer, a digital brain, do the same things? This is the one-sentence summary for why AI will be able to do all those things: because we have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer." --- Full Video on 'University of Toronto' YT Channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

334,691 次观看 • 10 个月前

ELON: WE’RE DESCENDANTS OF STARS – BUT HOW DID WE BECOME CONSCIOUS? “I've thought a lot about what is consciousness. Where does consciousness arise? If you start at the beginning of the universe, assuming the standard model of physics is true, then you have this Big Bang, the matter condensing into stars, those stars exploding. A lot of the atoms that are in your body right now were once at the center of stars. Those stars exploded, recondensed. Fast forward 13.8 billion years, and here we are. And somewhere along that very long journey to us, consciousness arose. Or the molecules started talking to each other. And it begs the question of what is consciousness? Is everything conscious? Maybe. It's hard to say where along that line, there's no sort of discrete point where consciousness didn't exist and then suddenly does exist. It seems to be, maybe you have a condensation of matter that has a density of consciousness, we don't know. The real answer is, we don't know what consciousness is. But with Neuralink and the progress that the company's making, we'll begin to understand a lot more about consciousness.” Source: Neuralink Update, June 2025

ELON: WE’RE DESCENDANTS OF STARS – BUT HOW DID WE BECOME CONSCIOUS? “I've thought a lot about what is consciousness. Where does consciousness arise? If you start at the beginning of the universe, assuming the standard model of physics is true, then you have this Big Bang, the matter condensing into stars, those stars exploding. A lot of the atoms that are in your body right now were once at the center of stars. Those stars exploded, recondensed. Fast forward 13.8 billion years, and here we are. And somewhere along that very long journey to us, consciousness arose. Or the molecules started talking to each other. And it begs the question of what is consciousness? Is everything conscious? Maybe. It's hard to say where along that line, there's no sort of discrete point where consciousness didn't exist and then suddenly does exist. It seems to be, maybe you have a condensation of matter that has a density of consciousness, we don't know. The real answer is, we don't know what consciousness is. But with Neuralink and the progress that the company's making, we'll begin to understand a lot more about consciousness.” Source: Neuralink Update, June 2025

Mario Nawfal

55,256 次观看 • 11 个月前

Elon Musk puts it simply: “You are your brain.” Not your heart, not your body—your brain. That lump of neurons is who you are, your entire identity. And the crazy part? Science is only just beginning to figure out what consciousness even is. We don’t know how thoughts turn into awareness. We don’t even know how you know you exist.

Elon Musk puts it simply: “You are your brain.” Not your heart, not your body—your brain. That lump of neurons is who you are, your entire identity. And the crazy part? Science is only just beginning to figure out what consciousness even is. We don’t know how thoughts turn into awareness. We don’t even know how you know you exist.

Ian Miles Cheong

2,212,027 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨GEOFFREY HINTON: WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW AI WORKS AI Pioneer Geoffrey Hinton: "We have a rough idea of what it's doing, but when it gets complicated, we don't know what's going on, similar to our understanding of the brain." 60 Minutes: "What do you mean we don't know exactly how it works? It was designed by people." Hinton: "We designed the learning algorithm, like the principle of evolution. But when it interacts with data, it creates neural networks we don't fully understand." Source: 60 Minutes, Newsy on IG

🚨GEOFFREY HINTON: WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW AI WORKS AI Pioneer Geoffrey Hinton: "We have a rough idea of what it's doing, but when it gets complicated, we don't know what's going on, similar to our understanding of the brain." 60 Minutes: "What do you mean we don't know exactly how it works? It was designed by people." Hinton: "We designed the learning algorithm, like the principle of evolution. But when it interacts with data, it creates neural networks we don't fully understand." Source: 60 Minutes, Newsy on IG

Mario Nawfal

502,988 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 A REAL PHYSICIST SAYS WE LIVE IN A SIMULATION (and he worked for NASA) 😱 💥He’s not an influencer. He’s not a conspiracy theorist. It’s Thomas Campbell, a physicist, former missile defense researcher, and author of *My Big TOE* (Theory of Everything). In an interview with Joe Rogan, he calmly explains: > “This physical reality is calculated. It is generated by consciousness.” According to him: - We are not humans. We are consciousnesses playing in a virtual universe (exactly like in *The Matrix*). - What we call “reality” is just a stream of data sent to our consciousness. - The purpose of this system? To reduce entropy (to increase order and the evolution of consciousness). He even goes further by citing the anthropic principle: the universe seems perfectly fine-tuned to allow the emergence of consciousness. As if it had been designed for that. And the most disturbing part: He says that logic alone is not enough to understand this. We also need to use the intuitive part of our consciousness. What do you think? Are we really in a simulation… or is it just an elegant metaphor?

🚨 A REAL PHYSICIST SAYS WE LIVE IN A SIMULATION (and he worked for NASA) 😱 💥He’s not an influencer. He’s not a conspiracy theorist. It’s Thomas Campbell, a physicist, former missile defense researcher, and author of My Big TOE (Theory of Everything). In an interview with Joe Rogan, he calmly explains: > “This physical reality is calculated. It is generated by consciousness.” According to him: - We are not humans. We are consciousnesses playing in a virtual universe (exactly like in The Matrix). - What we call “reality” is just a stream of data sent to our consciousness. - The purpose of this system? To reduce entropy (to increase order and the evolution of consciousness). He even goes further by citing the anthropic principle: the universe seems perfectly fine-tuned to allow the emergence of consciousness. As if it had been designed for that. And the most disturbing part: He says that logic alone is not enough to understand this. We also need to use the intuitive part of our consciousness. What do you think? Are we really in a simulation… or is it just an elegant metaphor?

Paul White Gold Eagle

17,811 次观看 • 15 天前

ELON MUSK: “In Hitchhiker’s Guide, the hard part isn’t the answer — it’s the question. Humanity still doesn’t know how to ask the right questions. By expanding consciousness, we can better understand what to ask about the universe.”

ELON MUSK: “In Hitchhiker’s Guide, the hard part isn’t the answer — it’s the question. Humanity still doesn’t know how to ask the right questions. By expanding consciousness, we can better understand what to ask about the universe.”

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

505,643 次观看 • 7 个月前

David Chalmers on the one thing science can't explain: Consciousness is at once the most familiar thing in the world and the one science has almost nothing to say about. That's the puzzle Chalmers lays out in this early interview, and it's as disorienting today as it was then. His starting point is deceptively simple. Everything we know about the external world: subatomic particles, distant stars, the chemistry of life. We know through consciousness. It's the very first thing we have. And yet when we turn science around and try to explain consciousness itself, we hit a wall. "Consciousness is what we start with when it comes to knowing the world and looking out at the world… everything else is secondary." What makes this so strange is the asymmetry. We've made extraordinary progress understanding things that are genuinely remote and difficult quantum mechanics, stellar evolution, molecular biology. But understanding our own inner experience? Almost nothing. "It almost sticks out like a sore thumb in the scientific picture." This is what Chalmers would later formalise as the "hard problem of consciousness": not just explaining how the brain processes information or controls behaviour. Those are hard, but tractable. The real mystery is why any of that physical activity is accompanied by experience at all. Why is there something it feels like to be you? The question isn't abstract. It sits at the intersection of neuroscience, philosophy, physics, and AI. As we build systems that process language and reason about the world, the question of whether they are or could be conscious presses harder than ever. Chalmers doesn't offer an answer here. Only the sharpest possible version of the question.

David Chalmers on the one thing science can't explain: Consciousness is at once the most familiar thing in the world and the one science has almost nothing to say about. That's the puzzle Chalmers lays out in this early interview, and it's as disorienting today as it was then. His starting point is deceptively simple. Everything we know about the external world: subatomic particles, distant stars, the chemistry of life. We know through consciousness. It's the very first thing we have. And yet when we turn science around and try to explain consciousness itself, we hit a wall. "Consciousness is what we start with when it comes to knowing the world and looking out at the world… everything else is secondary." What makes this so strange is the asymmetry. We've made extraordinary progress understanding things that are genuinely remote and difficult quantum mechanics, stellar evolution, molecular biology. But understanding our own inner experience? Almost nothing. "It almost sticks out like a sore thumb in the scientific picture." This is what Chalmers would later formalise as the "hard problem of consciousness": not just explaining how the brain processes information or controls behaviour. Those are hard, but tractable. The real mystery is why any of that physical activity is accompanied by experience at all. Why is there something it feels like to be you? The question isn't abstract. It sits at the intersection of neuroscience, philosophy, physics, and AI. As we build systems that process language and reason about the world, the question of whether they are or could be conscious presses harder than ever. Chalmers doesn't offer an answer here. Only the sharpest possible version of the question.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

14,034 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Jordan Jozak: "The Non Human Intelligence may be Interdimensional beings rather than Extraterrestrial Aliens" 👽 He told Jesse Michels that extraterrestrial spacecraft come from distant stars, but interdimensional beings emerging from a deeper field of reality where consciousness itself is the root of disclosure.** This challenges everything we think we know about the nature of the phenomenon. Rather than physical aliens traveling light years, evidence points to entities operating across dimensions, interacting with our reality through frequency and consciousness. Key insights: "We are probably dealing with multiple dimensions of reality." The phenomenon operates on levels beyond our standard spacetime, with beings utilizing or bringing themselves into our field of frequency. Consciousness is foundational not an emergent byproduct of matter, but central to understanding these encounters. Perceptions and awareness shape how we interpret these overlaps, aligning with cutting-edge views that reality emerges from a universal field. The discussion explores why the extraterrestrial hypothesis falls short for many cases: too many sightings, humanoid forms, behaviors inconsistent with interstellar travel, and a presence throughout human history. An interdimensional or field model better fits the data of high strangeness, including effects on consciousness and perception.

🚨 Jordan Jozak: "The Non Human Intelligence may be Interdimensional beings rather than Extraterrestrial Aliens" 👽 He told Jesse Michels that extraterrestrial spacecraft come from distant stars, but interdimensional beings emerging from a deeper field of reality where consciousness itself is the root of disclosure.** This challenges everything we think we know about the nature of the phenomenon. Rather than physical aliens traveling light years, evidence points to entities operating across dimensions, interacting with our reality through frequency and consciousness. Key insights: "We are probably dealing with multiple dimensions of reality." The phenomenon operates on levels beyond our standard spacetime, with beings utilizing or bringing themselves into our field of frequency. Consciousness is foundational not an emergent byproduct of matter, but central to understanding these encounters. Perceptions and awareness shape how we interpret these overlaps, aligning with cutting-edge views that reality emerges from a universal field. The discussion explores why the extraterrestrial hypothesis falls short for many cases: too many sightings, humanoid forms, behaviors inconsistent with interstellar travel, and a presence throughout human history. An interdimensional or field model better fits the data of high strangeness, including effects on consciousness and perception.

Interstellar

99,466 次观看 • 28 天前

"Succession" star Brian Cox: "The whole woke culture is truly awful." Piers Morgan: "And the shaming culture." Cox: "I don't know where it comes from. Who are the arbiters of this shaming? ... It turns out it's usually a bunch of millennials."

"Succession" star Brian Cox: "The whole woke culture is truly awful." Piers Morgan: "And the shaming culture." Cox: "I don't know where it comes from. Who are the arbiters of this shaming? ... It turns out it's usually a bunch of millennials."

The Recount

945,185 次观看 • 3 年前

This man created the model for Consciousness used by the CIA but was later killed in the deadliest plane crash in American history. Itzhak Bentov, the Czechoslovakia-born Israeli-American scientist and inventor, who became an innovator in the field of bio-medical engineering in the US, suggested that consciousness is the common uniting element of all creation, and that through this link all things are in permanent contact. Bentov believed that our minds are not just in our heads, but are connected to everything around us and even to the universe. He thought that this connection is what makes us alive and aware. (Stalking the Wild Pendulum: On the mechanics of consciousness, Itzhak Bentov, Wildwood House, 1978). For a long time, scientists didn't study consciousness because they didn't understand it. But in the XX century they started to learn more about it. Now, many scientists are working to understand consciousness, and yet it's still a mystery. Think of consciousness like a big puzzle that we're trying to solve. We know some of the pieces, but we don't know how they all fit together yet. Bentov's idea was an important piece of the puzzle, and scientists are still building on his work today.

This man created the model for Consciousness used by the CIA but was later killed in the deadliest plane crash in American history. Itzhak Bentov, the Czechoslovakia-born Israeli-American scientist and inventor, who became an innovator in the field of bio-medical engineering in the US, suggested that consciousness is the common uniting element of all creation, and that through this link all things are in permanent contact. Bentov believed that our minds are not just in our heads, but are connected to everything around us and even to the universe. He thought that this connection is what makes us alive and aware. (Stalking the Wild Pendulum: On the mechanics of consciousness, Itzhak Bentov, Wildwood House, 1978). For a long time, scientists didn't study consciousness because they didn't understand it. But in the XX century they started to learn more about it. Now, many scientists are working to understand consciousness, and yet it's still a mystery. Think of consciousness like a big puzzle that we're trying to solve. We know some of the pieces, but we don't know how they all fit together yet. Bentov's idea was an important piece of the puzzle, and scientists are still building on his work today.

Massimo

157,346 次观看 • 7 个月前

We know there are differences between the left and right sides of the brain, known as brain asymmetry. But it’s not yet clear how or why this comes about. Stephen Wilson and ibianco from UCL aim to find answers, with support from our Discovery Research Awards ⤵️

We know there are differences between the left and right sides of the brain, known as brain asymmetry. But it’s not yet clear how or why this comes about. Stephen Wilson and ibianco from UCL aim to find answers, with support from our Discovery Research Awards ⤵️

Wellcome

13,463 次观看 • 2 年前

You have a quantum computer inside your skull. The most efficient biochemical electromagnetic computer ever designed, with a wider array of processing capability and adaptability than any digital supercomputer ever made Not only this, you have a consciousness with the spark of life which is not just an observer experience, but is increasingly demonstrated to exert a foundational force in the construction and projection of physical reality through interactions with probabilities in the energy fields of this universe. The latent untapped potential inside the human consciousness and mind is far more powerful than we can possibly imagine, and we are still barely leaving the stone age

You have a quantum computer inside your skull. The most efficient biochemical electromagnetic computer ever designed, with a wider array of processing capability and adaptability than any digital supercomputer ever made Not only this, you have a consciousness with the spark of life which is not just an observer experience, but is increasingly demonstrated to exert a foundational force in the construction and projection of physical reality through interactions with probabilities in the energy fields of this universe. The latent untapped potential inside the human consciousness and mind is far more powerful than we can possibly imagine, and we are still barely leaving the stone age

⟠Palis⟠🐍

158,712 次观看 • 5 个月前