Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Please do not fall for clickbait (see below). The German Defence Minister's statement was heavily shortened and taken out of context. Pistorius never said there is nothing left in the stockpiles that can be provided to #Ukraine. He merely pointed out that he and the current German Foreign Minister,...

30,840 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

19 Kommentare

Profilbild von FellaFranca 🇩🇪 🦝 🇺🇦 🇬🇪
FellaFranca 🇩🇪 🦝 🇺🇦 🇬🇪vor 7 Monaten

@NFX360 Thank you. This was necessary.

Profilbild von GAU
GAUvor 7 Monaten

@NFX360 Sure thing

Profilbild von Kathryn Park
Kathryn Parkvor 7 Monaten

@Rebel44CZ Thankyou for clearing this up.

Profilbild von GAU
GAUvor 7 Monaten

@Rebel44CZ You're welcome!

Profilbild von asjemenou 🇳🇱
asjemenou 🇳🇱vor 7 Monaten

The difference between EU countries is frustrating.

Profilbild von echosierra
echosierravor 7 Monaten

France, France, anybody home?

Profilbild von Ryklii
Rykliivor 7 Monaten

But don't the people get really mad when France asks for money from allies to help Ukraine (which let's be real is the area we struggle the most) but like if understood correctly that's the plan here? And I'm in favor of it, "even" if it goes to the German industry.

Profilbild von GAU
GAUvor 7 Monaten

France is asking partners to fund their own industry for Ukraine. Germany is asking partners to either deliver more to Ukraine from their existing stocks or to fund ANY industry (not necessary the German one). BIG difference.

Profilbild von Ryklii
Rykliivor 7 Monaten

But since Germany is itself good at producing military stuff well then logically they'll enjoy more of the money than say Estonia. As your examples showed, fund raised by Germany (partly) goes to Germany. I think it's quite similar to France. Like how's that a big difference?

Profilbild von GAU
GAUvor 7 Monaten

Any further answer from me would just result in a long-text France bashing tweet. So either you believe me that there is a massive difference or not. Sry.

Profilbild von Ryklii
Rykliivor 7 Monaten

That's hella rude and like not helpful but ok.

Profilbild von Maria R.
Maria R.vor 7 Monaten

Okay, danke für die Aufklärung, und wisst ihr wann nun endlich der Taurus geliefert wird?? Warum genau wird er nicht geliefert? Was glaubt ihr? Ernstgemeinte Frage!

Profilbild von GAU
GAUvor 7 Monaten

Gerne! Also ich bin mir sehr sicher, dass es zu keiner Taurus-Lieferung kommen wird, allerdings kann ich zu den Gründen leider nichts sagen.

Profilbild von Maria R.
Maria R.vor 7 Monaten

Danke, ich denke, ich habe verstanden. Die deutsche Bevölkerung soll weiter Rätsel raten...Können Sie denn wenigstens sagen, ob der für die Ukraine wirklich hilfreich wäre?

Profilbild von GAU
GAUvor 7 Monaten

Eine Lieferung an die Ukraine wäre enorm wichtig und hilfreich.

Profilbild von Maria R.
Maria R.vor 7 Monaten

Herzlichen Dank!

Profilbild von GAU
GAUvor 7 Monaten

Gerne doch!

Profilbild von Sovereign Being
Sovereign Beingvor 7 Monaten

Where is the link to the full piece?

Profilbild von Sovereign Being
Sovereign Beingvor 7 Monaten

@grok what exactly is this German minister saying in this video?

Ähnliche Videos

Lavrov threatens Europe and Keith Kellogg over the project of a new European defence union with Ukraine. He said: “He [Kellogg] is now actively promoting the idea that a new military alliance should be created, and that Ukraine should not be brought into NATO, because, as they say, this has already been rejected both by President Trump and other members of his administration. And Kellogg, being also not a stranger in Washington, together with the European ‘grandees’, as they are called, is promoting the idea of creating a new military bloc with Ukraine as a member, and even not just a member, but as its leading participant […]” - Lavrov said. Lavrov is threatening Europe over militarisation and trying to drive a wedge between the White House and Europe. Moscow is very concerned by the fact that Ukraine is indeed being considered as a potential member of a European defense union. This was stated by Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius. Andrius Kubilius said that the European Commission is discussing an intergovernmental treaty to form a defence union and prepare the EU for independent defence, against the backdrop of the United States increasingly focusing on the Indo-Pacific region. The treaty is intended to strengthen the European Union’s role in defending Europe, while avoiding the recurring debate that defence is not an EU competence, but rather belongs to individual member states. The Commissioner also called for the creation of a new “real European defence union” involving the United Kingdom, Norway, and Ukraine. For this purpose, he suggested concluding a separate intergovernmental defence treaty, which could be modelled on the Schengen Agreement. The initiative to create a defence union involves not only legal formalisation, but also increased defence spending, expansion of production capacities, and stronger coordination between EU countries and close partners such as Ukraine, the UK, and Norway, which are expected to become members of the union. At the same time, defence policy would remain within the national competence of member states. 📹 CGTN

Anton Gerashchenko

137,498 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇩🇪‼️🚨 GERMAN GOVERNMENT COLLAPSED BECAUSE OF UKRAINE! -> Scholz is now ruling Germany with a minority in the parliament! Germany ran out of money to support Ukraine and is legally prevented to make more debt, that caused a clash within the government and it collapsed! (There were more problems, but that “straw broke the camels back”.) -> There is a “debt break” law, that prevents the German government to take on debt beyond an allowed sum, which Germany exhaust already. 1) According to chancellor Scholz, not being able to finance Ukraine or decrease financing of social spending to free money for Ukraine is an extraordinarily emergency situation that threatens Germany. So Scholz demanded from the finance minister to suspend the law and allow the take on more debt to pay for and send to Ukraine. The plan was to just make more debt for Ukraine. 2) But the finance minister refused to do that, since that would breach the oath of he gave to Germany as a finance minister. Essentially Ukraine collapse is of course is not threatening Germany, just Scholz and his government personally. 3) Scholz fired the finance minister Lindner for not obeying his wish. 4) The party of the finance minister FDP, in reaction retracted from the ruling government! The ruling government consisted out of 3 parties: SPD (Scholz’s party), the Green Party and the FDP. This is needed to form a majority in the parliament. But now one of these parties retracted from the coalition, hence the German government is now ruling with minority. 5) Scholz said “we have no time”, because he wants to finance Ukraine quickly before elections. So he is appointing new ministers for the now empty positions of the withdrawn FDP party. -> Technically (and legally) that is extremely questionable, since the government officially has no majority. So how is making critical decisions? Looks like Scholz wants to push through the Ukraine funding no matter what. 6) The opposition demands new elections quickly, but Scholz wants to govern with the support of the opposition for now. It is a clown show. For now the elections are rumored to come in March 2025. -> The “collective west” collapses on the back of Ukraine. USA Is lucky and likely steps back from this nonsense with Trump. Democracy apparently works without a majority as well.

Lord Bebo

433,587 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr