Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

$PLTR "All I've done for 16 years is deploy Palantir's software. That's literally all I've done. What I've seen in the last 6 months feels alien to me. It's a completely different paradigm with how customers are using our product." I sat down with Global Head of Commercial at...

amitisinvesting's profile picture

amit

470,885 subscribers

103,473 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationScience & TechnologyFinance
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

$PLTR Sat down with Palantir CEO Alex Karp at Palantir's 9th AIPCon to discuss where software is going, why AI models need an ontology, what Palantir's message is around the war, and why value creation is the only way to survive. Thank you to Alex for taking the time!
12:15

$PLTR Sat down with Palantir CEO Alex Karp at Palantir's 9th AIPCon to discuss where software is going, why AI models need an ontology, what Palantir's message is around the war, and why value creation is the only way to survive. Thank you to Alex for taking the time!

amit

232,597 views • 5 months ago

"It is the same enterprise-grade software but we're leaning on the talent of our customers to do the building." Zoë Nengite shares how Palantir for Builders is enabling pre-Series A startups and medium-sized companies to leverage Palantir software with their own builders to deliver value, growing the FDE culture outside of Palantir.
14:59

"It is the same enterprise-grade software but we're leaning on the talent of our customers to do the building." Zoë Nengite shares how Palantir for Builders is enabling pre-Series A startups and medium-sized companies to leverage Palantir software with their own builders to deliver value, growing the FDE culture outside of Palantir.

Palantir

42,198 views • 1 year ago

$PLTR Sat down with Forward Deployed Architect Chad Wahlquist Chad Wahlquist from Palantir to discuss how companies are reacting post AIPCon, what is different about Palantir's approach to AI, and why showing software can deliver value matters. Thank you Chad for making the time!
17:58

$PLTR Sat down with Forward Deployed Architect Chad Wahlquist Chad Wahlquist from Palantir to discuss how companies are reacting post AIPCon, what is different about Palantir's approach to AI, and why showing software can deliver value matters. Thank you Chad for making the time!

amit

73,796 views • 4 months ago

Greptile () YC W24 has raised $25m to Kill The Bug. A few months back I sat down with Daksh Gupta to talk about what they've built, how it's being used by thousands of engineers at the biggest companies in the world and why catching software bugs is one of the highest leverage applications for AI.
6:29

Greptile () YC W24 has raised $25m to Kill The Bug. A few months back I sat down with Daksh Gupta to talk about what they've built, how it's being used by thousands of engineers at the biggest companies in the world and why catching software bugs is one of the highest leverage applications for AI.

Brad Flora

34,689 views • 11 months ago

$PLTR $RCAT Sat down with Jeff Thompson, CEO of Redcat, at Palantir's 6th AIPCon to discuss how they are leveraging Palantir to innovate in the drone space, the current state of drone usage in American defense, and why critical situations require autonomous warfare. Thank you Jeff Thompson for taking the time!
16:01

$PLTR $RCAT Sat down with Jeff Thompson, CEO of Redcat, at Palantir's 6th AIPCon to discuss how they are leveraging Palantir to innovate in the drone space, the current state of drone usage in American defense, and why critical situations require autonomous warfare. Thank you Jeff Thompson for taking the time!

amit

51,468 views • 1 year ago

Sequoia partner Pat Grady says software is shifting from apps that demand attention to agents that work quietly in the background. This shift will change what moats will look like, and will be especially hard for incumbents to deal with. "It's two very different business paradigms," he says. "In an era of apps, you want a lot of surface area with your customers, you want them to spend a lot of time in your product." "In an era of agents, things can just be running passively in the background. The amount of surface area you have with your customers, the amount of time they might spend in your product might be de minimis. So the nature of the moat that you [will need to build] is different." "I think we'll see a lot of companies in the coming years able to live in the software world and have some of the workflows people are accustomed to. And then separately they can deploy these passive agents that kind of function as coworkers who just come back to you when things are done."
2:02

Sequoia partner Pat Grady says software is shifting from apps that demand attention to agents that work quietly in the background. This shift will change what moats will look like, and will be especially hard for incumbents to deal with. "It's two very different business paradigms," he says. "In an era of apps, you want a lot of surface area with your customers, you want them to spend a lot of time in your product." "In an era of agents, things can just be running passively in the background. The amount of surface area you have with your customers, the amount of time they might spend in your product might be de minimis. So the nature of the moat that you [will need to build] is different." "I think we'll see a lot of companies in the coming years able to live in the software world and have some of the workflows people are accustomed to. And then separately they can deploy these passive agents that kind of function as coworkers who just come back to you when things are done."

TBPN

58,374 views • 7 months ago

John McAfee told the world how to crack any phone in 2016: "Any computer, any software, whether is a Android, Apple, or what you have can be done." "We can do this with any machine and it is a half-hour job." "Now I've just told all of America and the whole world how it's done. It's trivial."
2:46

John McAfee told the world how to crack any phone in 2016: "Any computer, any software, whether is a Android, Apple, or what you have can be done." "We can do this with any machine and it is a half-hour job." "Now I've just told all of America and the whole world how it's done. It's trivial."

Defiant Ghost

435,109 views • 6 months ago

John McAfee told the world how to crack any phone in 2016: "Any computer, any software, whether is a Android, Apple, or what you have can be done." "We can do this with any machine and it is a half-hour job." "Now I've just told all of America and the whole world how it's done. It's trivial."
2:51

John McAfee told the world how to crack any phone in 2016: "Any computer, any software, whether is a Android, Apple, or what you have can be done." "We can do this with any machine and it is a half-hour job." "Now I've just told all of America and the whole world how it's done. It's trivial."

Shadow Intel

155,327 views • 2 months ago

Sequoia partner Pat Grady says software is shifting from apps that demand attention to agents that work quietly in the background. This shift will change what moats will look like, and will be especially hard for incumbents to deal with. "It's two very different business paradigms," he says. "In an era of apps, you want a lot of surface area with your customers, you want them to spend a lot of time in your product." "In an era of agents, things can just be running passively in the background. The amount of surface area you have with your customers, the amount of time they might spend in your product might be de minimis. So the nature of the moat that you [will need to build] is different." "I think we'll see a lot of companies in the coming years able to live in the software world and have some of the workflows people are accustomed to. And then separately they can deploy these passive agents that kind of function as coworkers who just come back to you when things are done." From his appearance on the show in January.
1:51

Sequoia partner Pat Grady says software is shifting from apps that demand attention to agents that work quietly in the background. This shift will change what moats will look like, and will be especially hard for incumbents to deal with. "It's two very different business paradigms," he says. "In an era of apps, you want a lot of surface area with your customers, you want them to spend a lot of time in your product." "In an era of agents, things can just be running passively in the background. The amount of surface area you have with your customers, the amount of time they might spend in your product might be de minimis. So the nature of the moat that you [will need to build] is different." "I think we'll see a lot of companies in the coming years able to live in the software world and have some of the workflows people are accustomed to. And then separately they can deploy these passive agents that kind of function as coworkers who just come back to you when things are done." From his appearance on the show in January.

TBPN

47,208 views • 4 months ago

$PLTR alright folks superbowl coming up after the bell regardless of what happens to the stock, being part of this community and getting to cover Palantir's journey has been one of the greatest blessings in my life. i really can't express my gratitude for people trusting me as a source for their Palantir news and coverage. it's been 4 years, 2k videos, 200 episodes of a weekly Palantir podcast...and I wouldn't have changed a single thing. having said that, we've got a ton of storylines going into earnings that can affect the stock: - is the SARs expense priced in or not? how bad is the hit? - does Palantir need to guide upwards of 35% YoY growth in 2025 for the street to be happy given the multiple its trading at or can they be at 30% and below? - if topline growth isn't as strong, are FCF growth, operating income margins, rule of 40, etc. enough to allow the street to feel Palantir will continue to grow into their potential? - if DeepSeek proved that LLMs are commodities and an LLM company like OpenAI is about to raise at $340B, what does that mean for a company like Palantir that's profitable and growing in the public markets? - what does government growth look like now with DOGE and can Palantir guide for some type of catalyst because of the government's willingness to spend more on software? Overall, I think Dr. Karp, Shaym Sankar and the entire team are going to crush it by essentially making the same argument they have made for 2 years: Palantir creates outcomes and that is what their customers pay for, not LLMs that can be found a dime-a-dozen and simply plugged into AIP, which is the software layered on Foundry that Palantir believes can create such incredible and transformative use cases (and we've seen many case studies of this already) that lead to them becoming one of the most important companies in the world. The stock will likely see algos and headlines that can move it, but this quarter is going to be determined by guidance, their ability to show continued growth and the market's overall interpretation of where Palantir lies in the broader AI sector. TIME TO EMBRACE ANOTHER CHAPTER IN THE ONGOING STORY OF ONE OF THE MOST EXCITING COMPANIES ON PLANET EARTH. & the best part is, we get to all embrace that chapter together, as a community. LFG.
1:58

$PLTR alright folks superbowl coming up after the bell regardless of what happens to the stock, being part of this community and getting to cover Palantir's journey has been one of the greatest blessings in my life. i really can't express my gratitude for people trusting me as a source for their Palantir news and coverage. it's been 4 years, 2k videos, 200 episodes of a weekly Palantir podcast...and I wouldn't have changed a single thing. having said that, we've got a ton of storylines going into earnings that can affect the stock: - is the SARs expense priced in or not? how bad is the hit? - does Palantir need to guide upwards of 35% YoY growth in 2025 for the street to be happy given the multiple its trading at or can they be at 30% and below? - if topline growth isn't as strong, are FCF growth, operating income margins, rule of 40, etc. enough to allow the street to feel Palantir will continue to grow into their potential? - if DeepSeek proved that LLMs are commodities and an LLM company like OpenAI is about to raise at $340B, what does that mean for a company like Palantir that's profitable and growing in the public markets? - what does government growth look like now with DOGE and can Palantir guide for some type of catalyst because of the government's willingness to spend more on software? Overall, I think Dr. Karp, Shaym Sankar and the entire team are going to crush it by essentially making the same argument they have made for 2 years: Palantir creates outcomes and that is what their customers pay for, not LLMs that can be found a dime-a-dozen and simply plugged into AIP, which is the software layered on Foundry that Palantir believes can create such incredible and transformative use cases (and we've seen many case studies of this already) that lead to them becoming one of the most important companies in the world. The stock will likely see algos and headlines that can move it, but this quarter is going to be determined by guidance, their ability to show continued growth and the market's overall interpretation of where Palantir lies in the broader AI sector. TIME TO EMBRACE ANOTHER CHAPTER IN THE ONGOING STORY OF ONE OF THE MOST EXCITING COMPANIES ON PLANET EARTH. & the best part is, we get to all embrace that chapter together, as a community. LFG.

amit

180,612 views • 1 year ago

$PLTR This is one of the coolest interviews I've ever done with a Palantir customer. Mixology is not only a small business, but they are a small business that tried many things before they found Palantir. Once they did, everything changed. Thank you to CEO Jordan Edwards for taking the time to sit down and explain why working with Palantir created magic-like results for your business!
11:50

$PLTR This is one of the coolest interviews I've ever done with a Palantir customer. Mixology is not only a small business, but they are a small business that tried many things before they found Palantir. Once they did, everything changed. Thank you to CEO Jordan Edwards for taking the time to sit down and explain why working with Palantir created magic-like results for your business!

amit

62,707 views • 4 months ago

“AI is changing the value prop of software.” We spoke with Metronome CEO Scott Woody about why AI requires a new business model. “In the cloud era…the value of the software scales as your org scales.” “In AI, the software is now doing work on your behalf…so the core value of the software is not who in my org has access to the data, it's what can this software do for me? When the value shifts from access to output, the business model has to follow.
1:36

“AI is changing the value prop of software.” We spoke with Metronome CEO Scott Woody about why AI requires a new business model. “In the cloud era…the value of the software scales as your org scales.” “In AI, the software is now doing work on your behalf…so the core value of the software is not who in my org has access to the data, it's what can this software do for me? When the value shifts from access to output, the business model has to follow.

a16z

23,455 views • 1 year ago

Parker Conrad (Parker Conrad) is co-founder & CEO of Rippling, an all-in-one HR, Finance, and IT software company valued at $13.5B. A founder of two unicorns, he's had one of the more dramatic startup journeys in recent years. For How to Build the Future, Parker sat down with Garry Tan to share his origin story, how AI is changing the game, and why he thinks the future will be defined by "compound" software startups.
0:46

Parker Conrad (Parker Conrad) is co-founder & CEO of Rippling, an all-in-one HR, Finance, and IT software company valued at $13.5B. A founder of two unicorns, he's had one of the more dramatic startup journeys in recent years. For How to Build the Future, Parker sat down with Garry Tan to share his origin story, how AI is changing the game, and why he thinks the future will be defined by "compound" software startups.

Y Combinator

47,270 views • 1 year ago

$PLTR PALANTIR WENT PUBLIC 5 YEARS AGO TODAY. They did a direct public offering at $10 a share. The company's market capitalization has 18x'ed since going public. CEO Alex Karp, 5 years ago: "We are going to deliver the world's best software with the world's most efficient way of delivering it. Investors will decide what's that worth and I think you'll find in a number of years that there will be a consensus Palantir is a truly special software company that is arguably the most important software company in the world."
5:10

$PLTR PALANTIR WENT PUBLIC 5 YEARS AGO TODAY. They did a direct public offering at $10 a share. The company's market capitalization has 18x'ed since going public. CEO Alex Karp, 5 years ago: "We are going to deliver the world's best software with the world's most efficient way of delivering it. Investors will decide what's that worth and I think you'll find in a number of years that there will be a consensus Palantir is a truly special software company that is arguably the most important software company in the world."

amit

400,926 views • 11 months ago

Ford CEO Jim Farley on why it's so difficult for legacy car companies to get software right & why Tesla’s vertically integrated approach is the right one: “We farmed out all the modules that control the vehicles to our suppliers because we could bid them against each other, so Bosch would do the body control module, someone else would do the seat control module, someone else would do the engine control module. We have about 150 of these modules with semiconductors all through the car. The problem is the software are all written by you know 150 different companies and they don't talk to each other. So even though it says Ford on the front, I actually have to go to Bosch to get permission to change their seat Control software. So even if I had a high-speed modem in the vehicle and and I had the ability to write their software, it's actually their IP and I have 150, we call it the loose Confederation of software providers, 150 completely different software programming languages, you know all the structure of the software is different. It’s millions of code and we can't even understand it all. That's why at Ford we've decided in the second generation product to completely insource electric architecture. To do that you need to write all the software yourself, but just remember car companies have never written software like this, ever, so we're literally writing how the vehicle operates the software to operate the vehicle for the first time ever.” via Everything Electric Show:
1:50

Ford CEO Jim Farley on why it's so difficult for legacy car companies to get software right & why Tesla’s vertically integrated approach is the right one: “We farmed out all the modules that control the vehicles to our suppliers because we could bid them against each other, so Bosch would do the body control module, someone else would do the seat control module, someone else would do the engine control module. We have about 150 of these modules with semiconductors all through the car. The problem is the software are all written by you know 150 different companies and they don't talk to each other. So even though it says Ford on the front, I actually have to go to Bosch to get permission to change their seat Control software. So even if I had a high-speed modem in the vehicle and and I had the ability to write their software, it's actually their IP and I have 150, we call it the loose Confederation of software providers, 150 completely different software programming languages, you know all the structure of the software is different. It’s millions of code and we can't even understand it all. That's why at Ford we've decided in the second generation product to completely insource electric architecture. To do that you need to write all the software yourself, but just remember car companies have never written software like this, ever, so we're literally writing how the vehicle operates the software to operate the vehicle for the first time ever.” via Everything Electric Show:

Sawyer Merritt

1,172,934 views • 1 year ago

On the heels of a record hot July, Ted Jenkin joined us in studio with some tips on how to prepare financially for more extreme heat and what is being done to combat the dangerous temps.
3:56

On the heels of a record hot July, Ted Jenkin joined us in studio with some tips on how to prepare financially for more extreme heat and what is being done to combat the dangerous temps.

America’s Morning Headquarters

24,739 views • 3 years ago

"I've done seen it all. This is Year 8 for me...going from not being in the playoffs, bottom of the East, and now, to one of the tops in the East, it's been amazing." Mitchell Robinson reflects on his journey with the Knicks:
0:43

"I've done seen it all. This is Year 8 for me...going from not being in the playoffs, bottom of the East, and now, to one of the tops in the East, it's been amazing." Mitchell Robinson reflects on his journey with the Knicks:

Knicks Videos

127,015 views • 4 months ago

$PLTR "How do we have the best investors in the world, especially individual investors? Why do they stick with us when times were hard? Why do they fight for Palantir? Why do they fight for us every time someone writes something? 'Palantir doesn't have a product.' 'Palantir's gone MAGA.' 'Palantir doesn't have margins.' I'm sure this quarter they'll say Palantir's growth is decelerating despite the fact it's obviously crushing it in America. 'Palantir is too crazy.' 'Palantir will never be profitable.' 'Palantir can't IPO.' 'Palantir is too weird and odd to produce something that will be disruptive.' We knew it was bullshit. The people who were out on the front fighting against that also knew it was BS and they were fighting against people maligning Palantir. They do it in great part because they believe that we are fighting for them, and we are. We're also fighting for ourselves, and that's why we have such a great company."
1:00

$PLTR "How do we have the best investors in the world, especially individual investors? Why do they stick with us when times were hard? Why do they fight for Palantir? Why do they fight for us every time someone writes something? 'Palantir doesn't have a product.' 'Palantir's gone MAGA.' 'Palantir doesn't have margins.' I'm sure this quarter they'll say Palantir's growth is decelerating despite the fact it's obviously crushing it in America. 'Palantir is too crazy.' 'Palantir will never be profitable.' 'Palantir can't IPO.' 'Palantir is too weird and odd to produce something that will be disruptive.' We knew it was bullshit. The people who were out on the front fighting against that also knew it was BS and they were fighting against people maligning Palantir. They do it in great part because they believe that we are fighting for them, and we are. We're also fighting for ourselves, and that's why we have such a great company."

amit

62,379 views • 1 year ago