Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

points: 1. someone asked about #TheSecretsOfHotel88 and Direk Kip's first thought was Raphie's wailing scene 2. pinagdi DM sa mga directors clip ni Esnyr??!! 🤯 3. tas dinaan lang nya yun sa confidence. no review 🎖

mnr___e ❥ data

1,075 subscribers

11,075 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

#TheSecretsOfHotel88

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Ante Kler interviewed PBBM today and asked about his health (na walang problema), and they also talked about the 2-week ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran, which happened just this morning at around 6:00 Manila time. DDS reaction? “Pre-recorded ‘yan. Matagal na ang video!” (I kid you not, ‘yan talaga isa sa mga comments nila.) So what now, si Ferdinand Marcos Jr. na pala ang bagong Nostradamus? Na-predict nya ang ceasefire before it even happened and he even pre-recorded a video about it? Old na raw ang video eh. Grabe. Hindi na lang sa misinformation magagaling ang mga kampon ni Sara Duterte, pati timeline binabaluktot na rin.

Ante Kler interviewed PBBM today and asked about his health (na walang problema), and they also talked about the 2-week ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran, which happened just this morning at around 6:00 Manila time. DDS reaction? “Pre-recorded ‘yan. Matagal na ang video!” (I kid you not, ‘yan talaga isa sa mga comments nila.) So what now, si Ferdinand Marcos Jr. na pala ang bagong Nostradamus? Na-predict nya ang ceasefire before it even happened and he even pre-recorded a video about it? Old na raw ang video eh. Grabe. Hindi na lang sa misinformation magagaling ang mga kampon ni Sara Duterte, pati timeline binabaluktot na rin.

Thea Tan

31,268 views • 4 months ago

Ive always wanted to post this whole conversation.. BIANCA' S PARENTS MUST HAVE AVAILED THE LIVESTREAM.. THATS WHY THEY NEVER judged DUSTIN. LIKE his haters did who probably watch it in Primetime, which is super edited or on tiktok vids who surely spliced it even more... to paint a certain narrative. He is just emotional of what happened.. Aminado nman silang lahat na sinadya nilang asarin sya ng paulit ulit. Kaya nya natawag na insensitive si michael kasi alam ng hurt na sya di pa rin tumitigil. ( even josh shared his experience with Michae and kira ) When he said di sya sanay sa ganun babae : putol lang kasi pero at the start of the video.. Dustin : ipaparinig mo na may gusto kang iba. my favorite part? How he explained "makakaapekto yun sa tingin ko syo." Dustin: ganun nman kasi talaga like yung actions natin.. for example sipain ko yan (cup tower) kahit sabihin kong joke lang nman anu magiging tingin mo sa kin? KUPS AKO. ginawa ko sya eh.. If anything this video proves kung gano nya talaga kagusto si Bianca from the start. Na before the incident puro positive lang yung nakikita nya sa kanya... and he was really happy. Natawa pa ko sa part na sabi nya.. Ienjoy na lang daw nya.. (stay sa PBB) di nman daw kailangan (lovelife) .. tapos sasabihin nyo sya ang may hanap ng loveteam... and sna na-air yung part na to.. Josh : outside ba di ka inaasar ng tropa mo? Dustin: inaasar nila ako sa gusto ko.. Hinde yung ganun.. Yung harapan tapos tropa tapos babae (na yung mga tropa nya tutuksuhin yung isa pa nyang tropa sa gusto nyang girl ) 😂 GETS?? he also mentioned that at that point.. they've had serious conversations na about family etc. Josh even asked if maingay pa din si bianca during those talks.. Dustin: TAHIMIK i also appreciate how he stopped talking when he noticed cameras were on him and how he said mabait si brenty. ( na di rin comfortable kay michael by the way eh first duo nya 😂) i hope everyone should see this.. the very conversation that has been blown out of proportion.. All villains have Backstories.. YES! but Dustin? he wasnt the villain...his backstory? makes him the victim.. Thank you sa pag edit sa primetime.. berigood kayo. #dustbia #dustinyu #BIANCADEVERA

Ive always wanted to post this whole conversation.. BIANCA' S PARENTS MUST HAVE AVAILED THE LIVESTREAM.. THATS WHY THEY NEVER judged DUSTIN. LIKE his haters did who probably watch it in Primetime, which is super edited or on tiktok vids who surely spliced it even more... to paint a certain narrative. He is just emotional of what happened.. Aminado nman silang lahat na sinadya nilang asarin sya ng paulit ulit. Kaya nya natawag na insensitive si michael kasi alam ng hurt na sya di pa rin tumitigil. ( even josh shared his experience with Michae and kira ) When he said di sya sanay sa ganun babae : putol lang kasi pero at the start of the video.. Dustin : ipaparinig mo na may gusto kang iba. my favorite part? How he explained "makakaapekto yun sa tingin ko syo." Dustin: ganun nman kasi talaga like yung actions natin.. for example sipain ko yan (cup tower) kahit sabihin kong joke lang nman anu magiging tingin mo sa kin? KUPS AKO. ginawa ko sya eh.. If anything this video proves kung gano nya talaga kagusto si Bianca from the start. Na before the incident puro positive lang yung nakikita nya sa kanya... and he was really happy. Natawa pa ko sa part na sabi nya.. Ienjoy na lang daw nya.. (stay sa PBB) di nman daw kailangan (lovelife) .. tapos sasabihin nyo sya ang may hanap ng loveteam... and sna na-air yung part na to.. Josh : outside ba di ka inaasar ng tropa mo? Dustin: inaasar nila ako sa gusto ko.. Hinde yung ganun.. Yung harapan tapos tropa tapos babae (na yung mga tropa nya tutuksuhin yung isa pa nyang tropa sa gusto nyang girl ) 😂 GETS?? he also mentioned that at that point.. they've had serious conversations na about family etc. Josh even asked if maingay pa din si bianca during those talks.. Dustin: TAHIMIK i also appreciate how he stopped talking when he noticed cameras were on him and how he said mabait si brenty. ( na di rin comfortable kay michael by the way eh first duo nya 😂) i hope everyone should see this.. the very conversation that has been blown out of proportion.. All villains have Backstories.. YES! but Dustin? he wasnt the villain...his backstory? makes him the victim.. Thank you sa pag edit sa primetime.. berigood kayo. #dustbia #dustinyu #BIANCADEVERA

little old me

47,999 views • 10 months ago

Diversionary tactic of Vice President Sara Duterte EXPOSED! The Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations responded to the video message of the Vice President Sara Duterte last night and I agree that this is nothing but a diversionary tactic. In his speech as attached below, Chairman Zaldy Co pointed out very good points and I highly recommend you watch its entirety. The video message last night was a diversionary tactic to the real issues 1.) the 125 million confidential funds spent in 11 days 2.) Low PISA score 3.) Issues and questions about the DepEd expenditures and a lot more. If there is one thing I want to highlight here, it is probably the part when Chairman Zaldy Co said that Vice President Sara Duterte assured them she can defend/justify the requested confidential funds. And so, let me thank the 19th Congress for disapproving the confidential funds requested by the OVP in 2024. “Pang-apat, paulit-ulit niyang sinasabi, "I will defer to the wisdom of Congress," pero hindi ito totoo. Kung talagang iginagalang niya ang Kongreso, sasagutin niya ang mga tanong, lalo na sa isyu ng confidential funds. Last year, kinausap namin si VP Sara tungkol sa 2024 budget, at sinabi niya na “ituloy n’yo yan” – meaning ang confidential funds – dahil kaya daw niya itong i-justify. Buti na lang at hindi namin itinuloy. Tama ang ginawa namin, at saludo ako sa aking mga kasama sa Kongreso. Ang kapangyarihan ng budget ay nasa Kongreso, at ipinagmamalaki ko na hindi namin isinuko ang kapangyarihang ito sa Office of the Vice President. Ang pinag-uusapan dito ay pondo ng taumbayan. Tandaan, ang COA, hindi Kongreso, ang nagsabing mali ang paggamit ng P73-million confidential funds sa loob lamang ng 11 araw “

Diversionary tactic of Vice President Sara Duterte EXPOSED! The Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations responded to the video message of the Vice President Sara Duterte last night and I agree that this is nothing but a diversionary tactic. In his speech as attached below, Chairman Zaldy Co pointed out very good points and I highly recommend you watch its entirety. The video message last night was a diversionary tactic to the real issues 1.) the 125 million confidential funds spent in 11 days 2.) Low PISA score 3.) Issues and questions about the DepEd expenditures and a lot more. If there is one thing I want to highlight here, it is probably the part when Chairman Zaldy Co said that Vice President Sara Duterte assured them she can defend/justify the requested confidential funds. And so, let me thank the 19th Congress for disapproving the confidential funds requested by the OVP in 2024. “Pang-apat, paulit-ulit niyang sinasabi, "I will defer to the wisdom of Congress," pero hindi ito totoo. Kung talagang iginagalang niya ang Kongreso, sasagutin niya ang mga tanong, lalo na sa isyu ng confidential funds. Last year, kinausap namin si VP Sara tungkol sa 2024 budget, at sinabi niya na “ituloy n’yo yan” – meaning ang confidential funds – dahil kaya daw niya itong i-justify. Buti na lang at hindi namin itinuloy. Tama ang ginawa namin, at saludo ako sa aking mga kasama sa Kongreso. Ang kapangyarihan ng budget ay nasa Kongreso, at ipinagmamalaki ko na hindi namin isinuko ang kapangyarihang ito sa Office of the Vice President. Ang pinag-uusapan dito ay pondo ng taumbayan. Tandaan, ang COA, hindi Kongreso, ang nagsabing mali ang paggamit ng P73-million confidential funds sa loob lamang ng 11 araw “

Just

271,574 views • 1 year ago

✨DESTINY✨ A fun and heartfelt story earlier at our Minamahal Block Screening at SM Sto Tomas, Batangas. May nag walk in na mag Tatay sa booth. I asked if manunuod sila, sabi ng daughter ni Tatay Allan, yes, pero isa lang daw. So I assumed, si girl daughter ang manunuof. To my surprise, si Tatay daw pala ang manunuod! 😭🥹 Then they asked, “magkano po?” I told them it’s for free. Tatay Allan was very happy. I told his daughter na samahan na niya si Tatay kasi may available seats pa naman. Few minutes later, dumating din yung wife ni Tatay Allan, tinawag sya nung anak niya and tatlo na sila nanuod. After the movie, I asked Tatay if pwede sya mainterview kasi I was so surprised… si Tatay ang fan!!! 🥹🥹🥹 Sabi talaga ng wife niya nako fan talaga yan ni Ashtine at Andres🥹😭 Here’s what he said about the movie and listen how dedicated he is as a fan that he knew Andres and Ashtine’s journey. 🥹😭 Brb, crying. 😭😭😭 What a win, Team Minamahal!!! Direk JPL, Ashtine & Andres! Truly, there’s no age limit to being a fan. 🥹 Thank you so much, Tatay Allan for the good words for Minamahal, and AshDres. 🫶🫶🫶

✨DESTINY✨ A fun and heartfelt story earlier at our Minamahal Block Screening at SM Sto Tomas, Batangas. May nag walk in na mag Tatay sa booth. I asked if manunuod sila, sabi ng daughter ni Tatay Allan, yes, pero isa lang daw. So I assumed, si girl daughter ang manunuof. To my surprise, si Tatay daw pala ang manunuod! 😭🥹 Then they asked, “magkano po?” I told them it’s for free. Tatay Allan was very happy. I told his daughter na samahan na niya si Tatay kasi may available seats pa naman. Few minutes later, dumating din yung wife ni Tatay Allan, tinawag sya nung anak niya and tatlo na sila nanuod. After the movie, I asked Tatay if pwede sya mainterview kasi I was so surprised… si Tatay ang fan!!! 🥹🥹🥹 Sabi talaga ng wife niya nako fan talaga yan ni Ashtine at Andres🥹😭 Here’s what he said about the movie and listen how dedicated he is as a fan that he knew Andres and Ashtine’s journey. 🥹😭 Brb, crying. 😭😭😭 What a win, Team Minamahal!!! Direk JPL, Ashtine & Andres! Truly, there’s no age limit to being a fan. 🥹 Thank you so much, Tatay Allan for the good words for Minamahal, and AshDres. 🫶🫶🫶

Maj

53,916 views • 10 months ago

1/2 🚨TOXIC DDS RED TAGGING QUEEN LORRAINE BADOY TARGETED ME ON SMNI FOR EXPOSING HER LIES. NOW SHE’S SUSPENDED AND I’M VINDICATED. 👏👏👏 [Long read but oddly satisfying 😂] 1. I kept this clip because I knew I’d laugh out loud one day because the universe will prove I was right all along. It is incredibly satisfying to rewatch this clip now. Let’s talk about the SMNI hosts of disinformation: Lorraine Badoy — the unhinged, newly suspended red-tagging queen; and Jeffrey Celiz. 2. But let’s talk about Jeffrey Celiz first. This is the same toxic propagandist from Iloilo City who used to be a lackey for former Iloilo City Mayor Jed Mabilog (now DILG USec) before his name ended up on Duterte’s infamous narco-list as a major drug personality. When the political winds shifted, Jeffrey Celiz miraculously underwent a "rebranding" and crawled out of the woodwork with a fake name, Ka Eric Almendras. He became a self-proclaimed “CPP-NPA cadre" who peddles fake news and red tags everyone. But he is a FAKE CADRE through and through. He left Iloilo because the other personalities in the narco-list got assassinated and he had to re-invent himself to avoid EJK. He even lied in front of Sen. Tito Sotto and Sen. Ping Lacson at the Senate by saying he was a government /PDEA asset. Huh? Kumukuha ang PDEA ng ex NPA Cadre and patay gutom na propagandist as an asset? Huwag mo nga kaming gawing tanga! Everyone in Iloilo knows who you are! Source: 3. Toxic DDS Red Tagging Queen Lorraine Badoy was furious in this video because my 2023 FB post caught her red-handed misquoting the Supreme Court’s resolution in Zarate vs. Aquino. I called her out because she has consistently used this specific case to give herself the fake authority to red-tag anyone. Kaya sya UNHINGED sa red tagging nya because she was quoting an SC ruling to make the DDS brainless minions believe she was doing the right thing. Yun pala, hindi nya binasa ang kaso. And if she did, she obviously didn’t understand the case. 😂 4. BADOY'S OWN FABRICATED DOCTRINE Badoy repeatedly lied on SMNI and claimed the Supreme Court ruled that [falsely] identifying someone as a member of the CPP-NPA-NDF carries "NO DANGER." She literally fabricated her own legal doctrine out of thin air just to justify her actions, and then turned around on-air to whine that I was merely being "too literal." Well, ate girl, a Supreme Court ruling explicitly states what it means. If the SC did not say it, then it doesn’t exist. Imbento ka ng ruling mo? Since you quoted the SC said something that’s literally non-existent, that means you literally spewed fake news and disinformation to put many people’s lives in danger! 5. Badoy and this kapalmuks Jeffrey Celiz even tried to insult me on-air by saying I am not a lawyer. Bakit, lawyers ba kayo? Kung hindi lawyer walang superior comprehension skills sa binabasa? Appeal to authority yarn? Ikaw, Jeffrey Celiz, did you even graduate from WVSU? Patingin nga ng diploma mo! You even falsely claimed you went to and graduated from UP Diliman when you didn’t even pass the UPCAT! Butigon! Palamunin ka lang naman sa Iloilo ng mga pulitiko who relied on your toxic propaganda and wrong grammar statements on the radio, and you were even seen rubbing shoulders with the biggest drug lord, Melvin Odicta. Sadly, he is now dead due to EJK. Di ba that’s the reason umalis ka sa Iloilo dahil takot ka na ikaw ang susunod na ma un-alive? And they can only quote Atty Topacio: a performative DDS lawyer na mahilig sa press conference and doesn’t even have a stellar record of courtroom wins. [Continue reading…]

1/2 🚨TOXIC DDS RED TAGGING QUEEN LORRAINE BADOY TARGETED ME ON SMNI FOR EXPOSING HER LIES. NOW SHE’S SUSPENDED AND I’M VINDICATED. 👏👏👏 [Long read but oddly satisfying 😂] 1. I kept this clip because I knew I’d laugh out loud one day because the universe will prove I was right all along. It is incredibly satisfying to rewatch this clip now. Let’s talk about the SMNI hosts of disinformation: Lorraine Badoy — the unhinged, newly suspended red-tagging queen; and Jeffrey Celiz. 2. But let’s talk about Jeffrey Celiz first. This is the same toxic propagandist from Iloilo City who used to be a lackey for former Iloilo City Mayor Jed Mabilog (now DILG USec) before his name ended up on Duterte’s infamous narco-list as a major drug personality. When the political winds shifted, Jeffrey Celiz miraculously underwent a "rebranding" and crawled out of the woodwork with a fake name, Ka Eric Almendras. He became a self-proclaimed “CPP-NPA cadre" who peddles fake news and red tags everyone. But he is a FAKE CADRE through and through. He left Iloilo because the other personalities in the narco-list got assassinated and he had to re-invent himself to avoid EJK. He even lied in front of Sen. Tito Sotto and Sen. Ping Lacson at the Senate by saying he was a government /PDEA asset. Huh? Kumukuha ang PDEA ng ex NPA Cadre and patay gutom na propagandist as an asset? Huwag mo nga kaming gawing tanga! Everyone in Iloilo knows who you are! Source: 3. Toxic DDS Red Tagging Queen Lorraine Badoy was furious in this video because my 2023 FB post caught her red-handed misquoting the Supreme Court’s resolution in Zarate vs. Aquino. I called her out because she has consistently used this specific case to give herself the fake authority to red-tag anyone. Kaya sya UNHINGED sa red tagging nya because she was quoting an SC ruling to make the DDS brainless minions believe she was doing the right thing. Yun pala, hindi nya binasa ang kaso. And if she did, she obviously didn’t understand the case. 😂 4. BADOY'S OWN FABRICATED DOCTRINE Badoy repeatedly lied on SMNI and claimed the Supreme Court ruled that [falsely] identifying someone as a member of the CPP-NPA-NDF carries "NO DANGER." She literally fabricated her own legal doctrine out of thin air just to justify her actions, and then turned around on-air to whine that I was merely being "too literal." Well, ate girl, a Supreme Court ruling explicitly states what it means. If the SC did not say it, then it doesn’t exist. Imbento ka ng ruling mo? Since you quoted the SC said something that’s literally non-existent, that means you literally spewed fake news and disinformation to put many people’s lives in danger! 5. Badoy and this kapalmuks Jeffrey Celiz even tried to insult me on-air by saying I am not a lawyer. Bakit, lawyers ba kayo? Kung hindi lawyer walang superior comprehension skills sa binabasa? Appeal to authority yarn? Ikaw, Jeffrey Celiz, did you even graduate from WVSU? Patingin nga ng diploma mo! You even falsely claimed you went to and graduated from UP Diliman when you didn’t even pass the UPCAT! Butigon! Palamunin ka lang naman sa Iloilo ng mga pulitiko who relied on your toxic propaganda and wrong grammar statements on the radio, and you were even seen rubbing shoulders with the biggest drug lord, Melvin Odicta. Sadly, he is now dead due to EJK. Di ba that’s the reason umalis ka sa Iloilo dahil takot ka na ikaw ang susunod na ma un-alive? And they can only quote Atty Topacio: a performative DDS lawyer na mahilig sa press conference and doesn’t even have a stellar record of courtroom wins. [Continue reading…]

Thea Tan

36,503 views • 1 month ago

Couple of things i found really well done by #Emmerdale in todays episode of Charity's SA story. 1. At the beggining I thought Charity would confront Dr. Todd directly, for what she did to her.. But Charity didn't.. She reported the assault immediately to the Police(well a soon as she could), she didn't change, didn't wash, she took all the evidence with her. 2. We saw in Charity's reaction how important it was for the Police to believe her, believe what had happened to her, and explain to her what they were gonna do about it.. Something that was completely different from the first time Charity was assulted, and I think this is a huge thing to tell.. And probably also one of the main reasons as to why this story was written in the first place... The justice system needs to belive in your story to be able to give victims the courage to report a crime, and not be made a mockery of... 3. We had Vanessa quite a bit with Dr. Todd and she was questioning where Charity was all night... My question is, will Emmerdale make Vanessa take Charity's side or Dr. Todd's side? 🫣 I really hope that Emmerdale does not screw Vanessa over... Cause this would be earth chattering for me if Vanessa does not take Charity's side with their past and all Vanessa did to help Charity through her first SA story...I will be screaming at my tv if they make Vanessa take Dr. Todd's side😤 💔

Couple of things i found really well done by #Emmerdale in todays episode of Charity's SA story. 1. At the beggining I thought Charity would confront Dr. Todd directly, for what she did to her.. But Charity didn't.. She reported the assault immediately to the Police(well a soon as she could), she didn't change, didn't wash, she took all the evidence with her. 2. We saw in Charity's reaction how important it was for the Police to believe her, believe what had happened to her, and explain to her what they were gonna do about it.. Something that was completely different from the first time Charity was assulted, and I think this is a huge thing to tell.. And probably also one of the main reasons as to why this story was written in the first place... The justice system needs to belive in your story to be able to give victims the courage to report a crime, and not be made a mockery of... 3. We had Vanessa quite a bit with Dr. Todd and she was questioning where Charity was all night... My question is, will Emmerdale make Vanessa take Charity's side or Dr. Todd's side? 🫣 I really hope that Emmerdale does not screw Vanessa over... Cause this would be earth chattering for me if Vanessa does not take Charity's side with their past and all Vanessa did to help Charity through her first SA story...I will be screaming at my tv if they make Vanessa take Dr. Todd's side😤 💔

Camz

77,098 views • 2 months ago

🚨Mysterious Weird Lights in the Sky | Pilots UFO Reports over Dallas! This is what the pilot sent in to VASAviation, link to the full video down there in the beavers pocket... "Last night I was operating a flight into DFW and we were cruising at 34,000 feet when I noticed two lights in formation. The lights would be super bright and then die out quickly and go away. We were at 34 and the lights were quite a bit above us on the horizon. My first thought was satellites, but they kept getting super bright and go away over and over." "I first checked with ATC to see if the SHIRLEY MOA was hot, but they said it was cold and nobody on the radar. They kept in the same 1-2 o’clock position on us for about 250 miles. And would be moving in formation, sometimes really fast on the horizon. After 30 minutes of watching them I check in with Ft. Worth on 134.47 and the conversation ended at 2:32Z." "I asked if the RIVERS MOA was hot and they said no with nobody on radar. You can maybe clip that part where other pilots reported seeing it and another pilot reporting they’ve seen the same lights before, but weren’t moving like this last time. It was super odd because they were high and fast and kept with us for a long time." #ufotwitter #uapX Source:

🚨Mysterious Weird Lights in the Sky | Pilots UFO Reports over Dallas! This is what the pilot sent in to VASAviation, link to the full video down there in the beavers pocket... "Last night I was operating a flight into DFW and we were cruising at 34,000 feet when I noticed two lights in formation. The lights would be super bright and then die out quickly and go away. We were at 34 and the lights were quite a bit above us on the horizon. My first thought was satellites, but they kept getting super bright and go away over and over." "I first checked with ATC to see if the SHIRLEY MOA was hot, but they said it was cold and nobody on the radar. They kept in the same 1-2 o’clock position on us for about 250 miles. And would be moving in formation, sometimes really fast on the horizon. After 30 minutes of watching them I check in with Ft. Worth on 134.47 and the conversation ended at 2:32Z." "I asked if the RIVERS MOA was hot and they said no with nobody on radar. You can maybe clip that part where other pilots reported seeing it and another pilot reporting they’ve seen the same lights before, but weren’t moving like this last time. It was super odd because they were high and fast and kept with us for a long time." #ufotwitter #uapX Source:

Skywatch Signal

28,408 views • 2 months ago

Claude Code can ship a 45-second animated explainer ad in 30 minutes. No video editor needed, just CC + skills. Here's how I made this video for Soteri Skin 👇 1. /plan Concept Brief (Claude Code) I handwrite a concept brief, then chat with the agent to iterate on it. The agent gathers any raw materials we might need - context about the brand, product images, end card, etc. The concept brief details the concept, characters, visual style, script, etc 2. /prepare a moodboard (CC + GPT Image 2 + ElevenLabs) After reviewing the script, generate: - character reference images - voiceover samples for the characters / narrator - the storyboard (scene by scene grid) - a few keyframe scenes 3. /generate Keyframes for each scene (CC uses Nano Banana or GPT Image 2) Uses the character references from the previous step to generate keyframes for each scene. I probably should have done a round of iteration at this step – there's some character drift and the pH meter representation could have been better. 4. /animate Keyframe → Animated Clip (CC uses Fal Seedance) Generate 2-4 representative scenes first to see a preview. If it looks good, then generate everything. 5. /stitch (CC + ffmpeg + ElevenLabs) - Stitch clips together with hard cut - Add a music score + SFX - Sync clips to the VO - Add captions - Review and edit timing / pacing issues 6. /watch the final cut and review it - as a video editor for technical errors (mismatched voiceover and visuals, AI hallucinations, etc) - as a viewer (ICP). I delegate most of the review to the agent because it catches more things and keeps me out of the loop as much as possible. It also fixes any issues found in the review. That's it. This video took me 30 minutes because I have already created skills for everything I described above. Some day, this will be < 5 minutes. I just review and chat to provide direction and feedback. The skills do all the technical work. 7. /learn Extracts learnings and updates the skills. This final step is really important. It turns this process into a closed loop system that makes the next video much easier to create because all the learnings from the human-in-the-loop process get encoded into code. Skills are code too. If you want access to the skill, drop a comment, and I'll DM it to you (must be following). If you want to make AI video ads like this, DM me.

Shiv

11,661 views • 2 months ago

[Eng] #EngfaWaraha #อิงฟ้ามหาชน P’Mook talking about that day that Engfa slipped on set. : It was an important scene in the series. Earlier, it had been raining, and we were filming in a traditional Thai house. I knew the crew was being extremely careful about safety. By “extremely careful,” I mean they wiped the floor dry over and over again. But since it was a traditional Thai house, and she was wearing shoes while walking, you know. We were shooting with a wide-angle camera, so I couldn’t stand close to her (though I wasn’t that far away either). Then, at one point during the take, she started walking a little faster. It was the very last take of that scene because we’d already finished filming all the other camera angles. Then… she slipped!! The first thing that crossed my mind was her hand because she instinctively put it out to break her fall. The floor where she fell was like 2 steps, and one of her legs hit the higher step. Thankfully, the actor who was in the same scene with her caught her in time, so the hand she put down didn’t take her full body weight. That’s why only her leg ended up getting injured. Can you believe that the moment it happened, everyone rushed over like zombies? We all swarmed in, the director, the assistant directors, the crew… everyone. I even jumped over a little table that was in the way to get to her. The first thing I asked was, “Are you okay? How do you feel? Does it hurt a lot? Can you move?” I had to ask because if she’d said she couldn’t move at all, we would’ve needed to provide a different kind of first aid. But she said, “It hurts,” while still laughing at herself. The crew quickly brought over some ice to help with the injury. And can you believe the very first thing she said was, “P’Mook, go ask for the video clip!” 😂 She was still joking because she had no idea how badly it was going to bruise the next day.

[Eng] #EngfaWaraha #อิงฟ้ามหาชน P’Mook talking about that day that Engfa slipped on set. : It was an important scene in the series. Earlier, it had been raining, and we were filming in a traditional Thai house. I knew the crew was being extremely careful about safety. By “extremely careful,” I mean they wiped the floor dry over and over again. But since it was a traditional Thai house, and she was wearing shoes while walking, you know. We were shooting with a wide-angle camera, so I couldn’t stand close to her (though I wasn’t that far away either). Then, at one point during the take, she started walking a little faster. It was the very last take of that scene because we’d already finished filming all the other camera angles. Then… she slipped!! The first thing that crossed my mind was her hand because she instinctively put it out to break her fall. The floor where she fell was like 2 steps, and one of her legs hit the higher step. Thankfully, the actor who was in the same scene with her caught her in time, so the hand she put down didn’t take her full body weight. That’s why only her leg ended up getting injured. Can you believe that the moment it happened, everyone rushed over like zombies? We all swarmed in, the director, the assistant directors, the crew… everyone. I even jumped over a little table that was in the way to get to her. The first thing I asked was, “Are you okay? How do you feel? Does it hurt a lot? Can you move?” I had to ask because if she’d said she couldn’t move at all, we would’ve needed to provide a different kind of first aid. But she said, “It hurts,” while still laughing at herself. The crew quickly brought over some ice to help with the injury. And can you believe the very first thing she said was, “P’Mook, go ask for the video clip!” 😂 She was still joking because she had no idea how badly it was going to bruise the next day.

~ Amy EL ~

16,002 views • 6 days ago

7 things i learned talking to David Senra (Founders podcast) for 2 hours: 1. Dan Carlin from hardcore history reads 30 books then records a single podcast episode over 9 months. that's why it sounds scripted but isn't 2. Bill Burr's early "podcast" was literally him calling a phone number, leaving a voicemail, and a service converting it to an MP3 3. a "tofu name" is a podcast name with no flavor. he renamed his pod to something searchable and it 3x'd in 90 days 4. Larry Ellison texted Elon "a billion, whatever you want" with a thumbs up emoji when asked to invest in buying Twitter. Elon talked him UP to $2B 5. Daniel Ek told him during the Rogan controversy, Spotify added 2 million subscribers. turns out when someone's heard you talk for 1000+ hours, a 2-minute news clip can't change their mind 6. david's startup idea: the best one is whatever you're already doing. just do it until you die 7. the founder of Perdue chicken ($10B+ poultry company) wanted to start selling hot dogs. someone asked him how it was going. he said "i haven't found my Mr. Hot Dog yet" meaning: the guy who goes to bed thinking about chicken hot dogs and wakes up thinking about chicken hot dogs that's the whole game. find the thing you can't stop thinking about this was recorded 18 months ago on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (thanks David Senra - come back on soon!) easily one of my favorite conversations ever

7 things i learned talking to David Senra (Founders podcast) for 2 hours: 1. Dan Carlin from hardcore history reads 30 books then records a single podcast episode over 9 months. that's why it sounds scripted but isn't 2. Bill Burr's early "podcast" was literally him calling a phone number, leaving a voicemail, and a service converting it to an MP3 3. a "tofu name" is a podcast name with no flavor. he renamed his pod to something searchable and it 3x'd in 90 days 4. Larry Ellison texted Elon "a billion, whatever you want" with a thumbs up emoji when asked to invest in buying Twitter. Elon talked him UP to $2B 5. Daniel Ek told him during the Rogan controversy, Spotify added 2 million subscribers. turns out when someone's heard you talk for 1000+ hours, a 2-minute news clip can't change their mind 6. david's startup idea: the best one is whatever you're already doing. just do it until you die 7. the founder of Perdue chicken ($10B+ poultry company) wanted to start selling hot dogs. someone asked him how it was going. he said "i haven't found my Mr. Hot Dog yet" meaning: the guy who goes to bed thinking about chicken hot dogs and wakes up thinking about chicken hot dogs that's the whole game. find the thing you can't stop thinking about this was recorded 18 months ago on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (thanks David Senra - come back on soon!) easily one of my favorite conversations ever

GREG ISENBERG

36,306 views • 3 months ago

Can anybody from the Senate media ask Sen. Padilla what is the basis of his statement that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? Because these are the facts: 1. There are no Chinese ships INSIDE Scarborough shoal. 2. There is no Chinese reclamation or base on Scarborough shoal. Simply put, there is no physical occupation by China on Scarborough. The media can verify and confirm these facts with the Ph Navy and PCG. 3. The Philippine Baselines Law, which I principally authored, is the official Ph claim for Scarborough Shoal and the KIG. Our claims were acknowledged as compliant when the baseline coordinates and regime of islands claims as stated in the said law were formally submitted to the UNCLOS secretariat in 2009. 4. The Arbitral Tribunal ruling in 2016 debunked the 9-dash line claim of Ch over Scarborough Shoal and the Spratlys. Therefore, Ph has a much stronger legal claim over Scarborough than Ch. So, if there is no physical occupation by Ch and there are much stronger legal Ph claims, what is now the basis of this oft repeated lie that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? WALA! When I researched on this, the first person who said that we lost Scarborough without any factual and legal basis at all is Mr. Harry Roque (paulit-ulit ding sinabi ito ni Duterte during the 2016 campaign and thereafter). So, as then Chairman of the Committee on National Defense and Security, I conducted hearings in 2013 and 2015 where I asked the Ph Defense officials then if we indeed lose Scarborough and they categorically said: "NO, WE DID NOT LOSE SCARBOROUGH." I even invited Mr. Roque in the 2015 hearing so that he could hear it himself. (See video below) These are all in the Senate records. To the Ph media, next time a resource person says that we lost Scarborough during the PNoy admin, can you ask that person what is his basis for saying so? I assure you, hindi nya masasagot ito. Kasi nga walang basehan. You need to ask this because every time a Filipino resource person says this baseless statement, he is not only unwittingly weakening our position as regards Scarborough but also basically conceding our sovereignty to Ch. Such would be a very unpatriotic thing to do. Finally, to Senator Robin Padilla, my unsolicited advice sayo ay magresearch o magtanong sa iyong mga advisers o staff bago magsalita tungkol sa mga importanteng bagay. Bilang isang halal na Senador, ikaw ay kumakatawan di lang ng pula o green, kundi kasama na rin ang mga yellow, pink at ang mga hindi bumoto sayo. Senador ka naming lahat na Pilipino.

Can anybody from the Senate media ask Sen. Padilla what is the basis of his statement that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? Because these are the facts: 1. There are no Chinese ships INSIDE Scarborough shoal. 2. There is no Chinese reclamation or base on Scarborough shoal. Simply put, there is no physical occupation by China on Scarborough. The media can verify and confirm these facts with the Ph Navy and PCG. 3. The Philippine Baselines Law, which I principally authored, is the official Ph claim for Scarborough Shoal and the KIG. Our claims were acknowledged as compliant when the baseline coordinates and regime of islands claims as stated in the said law were formally submitted to the UNCLOS secretariat in 2009. 4. The Arbitral Tribunal ruling in 2016 debunked the 9-dash line claim of Ch over Scarborough Shoal and the Spratlys. Therefore, Ph has a much stronger legal claim over Scarborough than Ch. So, if there is no physical occupation by Ch and there are much stronger legal Ph claims, what is now the basis of this oft repeated lie that we lost Scarborough during PNoy admin? WALA! When I researched on this, the first person who said that we lost Scarborough without any factual and legal basis at all is Mr. Harry Roque (paulit-ulit ding sinabi ito ni Duterte during the 2016 campaign and thereafter). So, as then Chairman of the Committee on National Defense and Security, I conducted hearings in 2013 and 2015 where I asked the Ph Defense officials then if we indeed lose Scarborough and they categorically said: "NO, WE DID NOT LOSE SCARBOROUGH." I even invited Mr. Roque in the 2015 hearing so that he could hear it himself. (See video below) These are all in the Senate records. To the Ph media, next time a resource person says that we lost Scarborough during the PNoy admin, can you ask that person what is his basis for saying so? I assure you, hindi nya masasagot ito. Kasi nga walang basehan. You need to ask this because every time a Filipino resource person says this baseless statement, he is not only unwittingly weakening our position as regards Scarborough but also basically conceding our sovereignty to Ch. Such would be a very unpatriotic thing to do. Finally, to Senator Robin Padilla, my unsolicited advice sayo ay magresearch o magtanong sa iyong mga advisers o staff bago magsalita tungkol sa mga importanteng bagay. Bilang isang halal na Senador, ikaw ay kumakatawan di lang ng pula o green, kundi kasama na rin ang mga yellow, pink at ang mga hindi bumoto sayo. Senador ka naming lahat na Pilipino.

Sonny Trillanes IV

471,782 views • 2 years ago

Obsidian + method Karpathy + Claude Code = a quantum second brain that talks back. Most second brains are graveyards you clip 300 articles, tag 80 notes, build a graph that looks like a galaxy, then never open it again. Karpathy fix is stupid simple: 1 file, append only, new thought on top, review by scrolling no folders, no tags, no 40-minute “PKM setup” videos. The capture layer is 1 Obsidian vault with 1 file called stream md, where every idea, quote and link lands in under 10 seconds, because anything slower and you quit by day 4. Once a week Claude Code reads the whole vault from the terminal with 1 prompt “find the 5 ideas I keep circling without noticing” and sees patterns across 6 months you can’t hold in working memory. Instead of searching keywords you ask questions like “what did I think about agent pricing in March,” and Claude greps 4,000 notes and quotes your own words back with file paths. Then the vault becomes context drafting a post, a pitch or a spec, Claude pulls in your past thinking instead of generic internet mush, and your output starts sounding like you, compressed. The first week feels pointless at 20 notes, month 1 brings the first “wait, I already solved this” moment, by month 3 Claude connects 2 notes written 70 days apart and that connection becomes your best post of the year, by month 6 you stop asking Google things you already answered. The whole setup costs $0 in software and 1 evening. Notion sells you a workspace, Obsidian gives you files, Claude gives them a voice. Everyone rents a second brain this one lives on your disk and grows. You wrote the notes, and now something finally reads them.

Obsidian + method Karpathy + Claude Code = a quantum second brain that talks back. Most second brains are graveyards you clip 300 articles, tag 80 notes, build a graph that looks like a galaxy, then never open it again. Karpathy fix is stupid simple: 1 file, append only, new thought on top, review by scrolling no folders, no tags, no 40-minute “PKM setup” videos. The capture layer is 1 Obsidian vault with 1 file called stream md, where every idea, quote and link lands in under 10 seconds, because anything slower and you quit by day 4. Once a week Claude Code reads the whole vault from the terminal with 1 prompt “find the 5 ideas I keep circling without noticing” and sees patterns across 6 months you can’t hold in working memory. Instead of searching keywords you ask questions like “what did I think about agent pricing in March,” and Claude greps 4,000 notes and quotes your own words back with file paths. Then the vault becomes context drafting a post, a pitch or a spec, Claude pulls in your past thinking instead of generic internet mush, and your output starts sounding like you, compressed. The first week feels pointless at 20 notes, month 1 brings the first “wait, I already solved this” moment, by month 3 Claude connects 2 notes written 70 days apart and that connection becomes your best post of the year, by month 6 you stop asking Google things you already answered. The whole setup costs $0 in software and 1 evening. Notion sells you a workspace, Obsidian gives you files, Claude gives them a voice. Everyone rents a second brain this one lives on your disk and grows. You wrote the notes, and now something finally reads them.

West Lord

62,978 views • 21 days ago

Obsidian just became the most dangerous folder on your computer, and Andrej Karpathy predicted it with 1 markdown file. His method is called append-and-review. He described it years ago and almost nobody listened: 1 single note, every thought appended to the top, reviewed on random scrolls. No tags, no folders, no Notion dashboards with 40 linked databases. The problem was always the same the note remembers, but it can't act. That changed the moment people pointed Claude Code at an Obsidian vault. Here's the setup that's quietly spreading: Part 1 — The vault becomes a database. Obsidian stores everything as plain markdown on your disk, which means Claude Code can read it like a codebase. You open a terminal inside the vault folder and your 2,000 notes turn into queryable memory. Part 2 — The CLAUDEmd file becomes the brain stem. One file at the root tells the agent who you are, what you're building, and how your notes are structured. From that point every session starts with full context instead of a blank chat window. Part 3 — Karpathy append log becomes fuel. You dump raw thoughts all day ideas, links, half-sentences. Then 1 command at night: review today's appends, extract action items, draft the 3 posts hiding in there, link them to existing notes. The messy log goes in, structured output comes out, and the vault rewrites itself while you sleep. Part 4 — Agents start living in your notes. People are running weekly reviews, content calendars, even market research as scheduled Claude Code runs over their vault. Your second brain stops being a graveyard of highlights and starts shipping. The honest math: setup takes about 90 minutes, the first week feels like overkill, and by day 30 you're sitting on a system where every note you've written in 5 years is working for you instead of rotting in a folder. Notion needed a server, a subscription and your data on someone else's machine. Obsidian needed a text file and now the text file has an employee.

Obsidian just became the most dangerous folder on your computer, and Andrej Karpathy predicted it with 1 markdown file. His method is called append-and-review. He described it years ago and almost nobody listened: 1 single note, every thought appended to the top, reviewed on random scrolls. No tags, no folders, no Notion dashboards with 40 linked databases. The problem was always the same the note remembers, but it can't act. That changed the moment people pointed Claude Code at an Obsidian vault. Here's the setup that's quietly spreading: Part 1 — The vault becomes a database. Obsidian stores everything as plain markdown on your disk, which means Claude Code can read it like a codebase. You open a terminal inside the vault folder and your 2,000 notes turn into queryable memory. Part 2 — The CLAUDEmd file becomes the brain stem. One file at the root tells the agent who you are, what you're building, and how your notes are structured. From that point every session starts with full context instead of a blank chat window. Part 3 — Karpathy append log becomes fuel. You dump raw thoughts all day ideas, links, half-sentences. Then 1 command at night: review today's appends, extract action items, draft the 3 posts hiding in there, link them to existing notes. The messy log goes in, structured output comes out, and the vault rewrites itself while you sleep. Part 4 — Agents start living in your notes. People are running weekly reviews, content calendars, even market research as scheduled Claude Code runs over their vault. Your second brain stops being a graveyard of highlights and starts shipping. The honest math: setup takes about 90 minutes, the first week feels like overkill, and by day 30 you're sitting on a system where every note you've written in 5 years is working for you instead of rotting in a folder. Notion needed a server, a subscription and your data on someone else's machine. Obsidian needed a text file and now the text file has an employee.

Spike 1%

58,428 views • 19 days ago

🚨PBBM to the Senators: GET BACK TO WORK! This is what he said in this interview: 1. Get back to work. Get back to work because it's important. Ang dami nating kailangan gawin. We had a meeting sa UPLIFT Committee and marami tayong kailangan pagawa sa mga batas, mga batas na we were thinking na baka magka-supplemental budget, baka magka- amendahan namin ang mga ibang batas. Ito ay kailangan para makapagbigay tayo ng tulong sa taong bayan dahil nga sa oil crisis. Kung walang session, hindi ko nga maintindihan eh dahil ang pagkakaintindi ko is that ang rules — nag-congressman naman ako, nag-senador din naman ako. Ang rules diyan bago ka mag-cancel ng session, you have to inform the other house three days before you cancel a session and there has to be a very good reason for canceling a session. 2. I don't think na ihahatid mo ang isang senador para pumunta kung saan siya pupunta, hindi yata sapat na dahilan para i-cancel ang isang session. Isang session lang 'yun. Ngayon, kanselado na naman ang isang session. Hindi ko nga maintindihan kung papaano sila magtatrabaho kung ganito. Ang House of Representatives ngayon ay nagtataka kung papaano ba, nagbago na ba ‘yung rules, nagbago na ba 'yung mga patakaran natin kagaya ng mga nakaraan? It is a rule that is contained in the Constitution. 3. I'm afraid all these events that we have been witnessing has thrown the Senate and its leadership, the whole Senate, into disarray. It has discredited the leadership and it has stopped the essential business of legislation in government. The two other departments continue to work. The Executive continues to work. The Judiciary continues to work. Why does the Legislature decide to stop working? I don't understand that. I talked to my fellow senators at the time I was senator and we cannot figure out bakit magkakaganto, anong nangyari, paano tayo napunta rito. 4. The best description I can have is that the Legislature is now in disarray. But that is exactly the opposite from what we are trying to achieve. We are trying to achieve some form of stability so that people can get on with their lives, so that people can plan ahead for their future, so that people can count on the assistance of government during this time of an emergency. And we cannot do that if the Legislature decides to stay at home and have a vacation. That is anathema to everything that governance is about. 5. I never imagined in my entire life, in my entire political life, that such a thing could happen, especially to the august — it's no longer august now — to the august body of the upper house, the Senate of the Philippines. ###

🚨PBBM to the Senators: GET BACK TO WORK! This is what he said in this interview: 1. Get back to work. Get back to work because it's important. Ang dami nating kailangan gawin. We had a meeting sa UPLIFT Committee and marami tayong kailangan pagawa sa mga batas, mga batas na we were thinking na baka magka-supplemental budget, baka magka- amendahan namin ang mga ibang batas. Ito ay kailangan para makapagbigay tayo ng tulong sa taong bayan dahil nga sa oil crisis. Kung walang session, hindi ko nga maintindihan eh dahil ang pagkakaintindi ko is that ang rules — nag-congressman naman ako, nag-senador din naman ako. Ang rules diyan bago ka mag-cancel ng session, you have to inform the other house three days before you cancel a session and there has to be a very good reason for canceling a session. 2. I don't think na ihahatid mo ang isang senador para pumunta kung saan siya pupunta, hindi yata sapat na dahilan para i-cancel ang isang session. Isang session lang 'yun. Ngayon, kanselado na naman ang isang session. Hindi ko nga maintindihan kung papaano sila magtatrabaho kung ganito. Ang House of Representatives ngayon ay nagtataka kung papaano ba, nagbago na ba ‘yung rules, nagbago na ba 'yung mga patakaran natin kagaya ng mga nakaraan? It is a rule that is contained in the Constitution. 3. I'm afraid all these events that we have been witnessing has thrown the Senate and its leadership, the whole Senate, into disarray. It has discredited the leadership and it has stopped the essential business of legislation in government. The two other departments continue to work. The Executive continues to work. The Judiciary continues to work. Why does the Legislature decide to stop working? I don't understand that. I talked to my fellow senators at the time I was senator and we cannot figure out bakit magkakaganto, anong nangyari, paano tayo napunta rito. 4. The best description I can have is that the Legislature is now in disarray. But that is exactly the opposite from what we are trying to achieve. We are trying to achieve some form of stability so that people can get on with their lives, so that people can plan ahead for their future, so that people can count on the assistance of government during this time of an emergency. And we cannot do that if the Legislature decides to stay at home and have a vacation. That is anathema to everything that governance is about. 5. I never imagined in my entire life, in my entire political life, that such a thing could happen, especially to the august — it's no longer august now — to the august body of the upper house, the Senate of the Philippines. ###

Thea Tan

13,262 views • 2 months ago

𝑇𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝐻𝑜𝑜𝑝𝑠 𝐻𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 20 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑓𝑢𝑙 𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑂𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝐸𝑟𝑎. 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 12𝑡ℎ 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠. 𝐍𝐨. 𝟕 𝐀𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐦𝐚 𝟕𝟖, 𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐲 𝟓𝟐 Date: Jan. 7, 2023 Impact/History: Largest margin of victory by the Crimson Tide over the Wildcats Where: Tuscaloosa (Coleman Coliseum) If victories over two different No. 1-ranked teams before SEC play even started had not been enough to grab the attention of college basketball, Alabama Men’s Basketball made another emphatic statement with a historical drubbing of the Kentucky Wildcats in front of a rabid sellout crowd in Coleman Coliseum. In his fourth season at the Capstone, Nate Oats led the Crimson Tide to its largest margin of victory against the Wildcats in a lopsided 78-52 dismantling that had Kentucky head coach John Calipari calling a timeout in the opening two minutes. “The crowd was unbelievable,” Oats said. “Students aren’t in school until Wednesday, the first day of class, so for them to show up and support us like they did was great. “We’re trying to put a program and product out there that everyone is proud to support, and they definitely supported us tonight, so I just want to thank everybody for that.” The 26-point walloping edged the previous best in program history which occurred in 1990 when Alabama throttled Kentucky 83-58. Alabama opened the game on a quick 6-0 run that had sophomore center Charles Bediako putting the reigning national player of the year, Oscar Tshiebwe, in the torture chamber. The fast start by the Crimson Tide infuriated Calipari so much he had to call a timeout just 2 minutes and eight seconds into the game. Brandon Miller led Alabama with 19 points and seven rebounds, while Mark Sears had 16 points, six rebounds and four assists. Jahvon Quinerly had 12 points and Bediako finished with nine points, six rebounds and two blocks. “I can’t say enough about our guys and how hard they played on defense and how locked in to the scouting report they were,” Oats said. “I thought Sears was unbelievable. I thought Charles was great on Tshiebwe.” Alabama led 35-24 at halftime and opened the second half on a 13-3 run to push the margin to 48-27. At one point the advantage reached 31 points. Tshiebwe struggled against the size of Bediako and finished with just four points and six rebounds.

𝑇𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝐻𝑜𝑜𝑝𝑠 𝐻𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 20 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑓𝑢𝑙 𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑂𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝐸𝑟𝑎. 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 12𝑡ℎ 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠. 𝐍𝐨. 𝟕 𝐀𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐦𝐚 𝟕𝟖, 𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐲 𝟓𝟐 Date: Jan. 7, 2023 Impact/History: Largest margin of victory by the Crimson Tide over the Wildcats Where: Tuscaloosa (Coleman Coliseum) If victories over two different No. 1-ranked teams before SEC play even started had not been enough to grab the attention of college basketball, Alabama Men’s Basketball made another emphatic statement with a historical drubbing of the Kentucky Wildcats in front of a rabid sellout crowd in Coleman Coliseum. In his fourth season at the Capstone, Nate Oats led the Crimson Tide to its largest margin of victory against the Wildcats in a lopsided 78-52 dismantling that had Kentucky head coach John Calipari calling a timeout in the opening two minutes. “The crowd was unbelievable,” Oats said. “Students aren’t in school until Wednesday, the first day of class, so for them to show up and support us like they did was great. “We’re trying to put a program and product out there that everyone is proud to support, and they definitely supported us tonight, so I just want to thank everybody for that.” The 26-point walloping edged the previous best in program history which occurred in 1990 when Alabama throttled Kentucky 83-58. Alabama opened the game on a quick 6-0 run that had sophomore center Charles Bediako putting the reigning national player of the year, Oscar Tshiebwe, in the torture chamber. The fast start by the Crimson Tide infuriated Calipari so much he had to call a timeout just 2 minutes and eight seconds into the game. Brandon Miller led Alabama with 19 points and seven rebounds, while Mark Sears had 16 points, six rebounds and four assists. Jahvon Quinerly had 12 points and Bediako finished with nine points, six rebounds and two blocks. “I can’t say enough about our guys and how hard they played on defense and how locked in to the scouting report they were,” Oats said. “I thought Sears was unbelievable. I thought Charles was great on Tshiebwe.” Alabama led 35-24 at halftime and opened the second half on a 13-3 run to push the margin to 48-27. At one point the advantage reached 31 points. Tshiebwe struggled against the size of Bediako and finished with just four points and six rebounds.

Tide Hoops History

15,402 views • 1 year ago

A number of you have asked about the call at the end of the 1st Half of the Bethel Football game at NCC Football in which there was a potential fumble/TD wiped off the board for Bethel that eventually led to no score by the Royals. The full play and a breakdown of issues with the call are in the video below. To be clear, though: 1) It appears that the receiver did not possess the ball at or past the NCC 8, which was needed for the 1st Down (the officials gave the ball to Bethel at the 8 after the overturn, awarding a 1st down). 2) It seems like the wing official was marking forward progress but may not have blown his whistle. It is unclear how he affected the overturn decision in the first place. What is clear is that the officials on the field awarded a fumble and TD, meaning they did not rule forward progress had been stopped. As a result, this aspect of the play is NOT reviewable by rule, as it is a judgment call in real time. 3) No TD should have been awarded before the review in the first place, as the ball clearly was fumbled to the lineman, and fumbles on 4th down in college football can only be advanced by the fumbling player. The ball would have been marked at the spot of the fumble in that case. 4) The officials missed a clear Roughing the Passer call, as the NCC defender went for the Bethel QB's legs while he was in his passing stance. This would have been a half-the-distance and automatic-first-down foul. If this play was called correctly in the first place, it should have been called dead with forward progress stopped at the 8 1/2 yard line and the Roughing foul pushing the ball to the 4 1/4 yard line, 1st & Goal Bethel, with the clock stopped due to penalty. No matter what, though, the Roughing penalty would have ensured Bethel had the ball closer to the goal with 16 seconds left (when forward progress stoppage should have been called). In The (D3FB) Huddle #d3fb

A number of you have asked about the call at the end of the 1st Half of the Bethel Football game at NCC Football in which there was a potential fumble/TD wiped off the board for Bethel that eventually led to no score by the Royals. The full play and a breakdown of issues with the call are in the video below. To be clear, though: 1) It appears that the receiver did not possess the ball at or past the NCC 8, which was needed for the 1st Down (the officials gave the ball to Bethel at the 8 after the overturn, awarding a 1st down). 2) It seems like the wing official was marking forward progress but may not have blown his whistle. It is unclear how he affected the overturn decision in the first place. What is clear is that the officials on the field awarded a fumble and TD, meaning they did not rule forward progress had been stopped. As a result, this aspect of the play is NOT reviewable by rule, as it is a judgment call in real time. 3) No TD should have been awarded before the review in the first place, as the ball clearly was fumbled to the lineman, and fumbles on 4th down in college football can only be advanced by the fumbling player. The ball would have been marked at the spot of the fumble in that case. 4) The officials missed a clear Roughing the Passer call, as the NCC defender went for the Bethel QB's legs while he was in his passing stance. This would have been a half-the-distance and automatic-first-down foul. If this play was called correctly in the first place, it should have been called dead with forward progress stopped at the 8 1/2 yard line and the Roughing foul pushing the ball to the 4 1/4 yard line, 1st & Goal Bethel, with the clock stopped due to penalty. No matter what, though, the Roughing penalty would have ensured Bethel had the ball closer to the goal with 16 seconds left (when forward progress stoppage should have been called). In The (D3FB) Huddle #d3fb

Frank Rossi

28,446 views • 7 months ago

🚨 THREAD: Why I started investigating Mayor Zohran Mamdani (and why this isn’t going away) Watch this first ⬇️ 1/ Let me be very clear. I didn’t go looking for this story. This started with ONE simple question: Where did a donation actually go? 2/ Money that was supposed to go to a nonprofit in Astoria, Queens… …was allegedly redirected somewhere else. So I asked questions. Like anyone should. 3/ And instead of transparency? I got THREATS. Not from the Mayor. Not from the nonprofit. From a MUSIC PRODUCER. 4/ Let that sink in. A random person with no official role felt bold enough to intimidate me… Over questions about MONEY. Why? 5/ Ask yourself this: Why would anyone be angry about someone asking where THEIR donation went? Why the pressure? Why the silence? 6/ That’s when I knew— This isn’t just about one donation. This is about something bigger. 7/ I was actually contacted about this last year. At the time, I didn’t act on it. Now I understand why it was brought to me. 8/ The more I look into this, the more questions come up. And the reactions I’ve received? Only confirm I’m on the right track. 9/ I’m not backing down. If you have nothing to hide, questions shouldn’t be a problem. 10/ Watch the video. Share it. Ask questions. Because I don’t think this story ends here. JD Vance please look into the nonprofit food distributions in Queens and the Bronx! JD Vance

🚨 THREAD: Why I started investigating Mayor Zohran Mamdani (and why this isn’t going away) Watch this first ⬇️ 1/ Let me be very clear. I didn’t go looking for this story. This started with ONE simple question: Where did a donation actually go? 2/ Money that was supposed to go to a nonprofit in Astoria, Queens… …was allegedly redirected somewhere else. So I asked questions. Like anyone should. 3/ And instead of transparency? I got THREATS. Not from the Mayor. Not from the nonprofit. From a MUSIC PRODUCER. 4/ Let that sink in. A random person with no official role felt bold enough to intimidate me… Over questions about MONEY. Why? 5/ Ask yourself this: Why would anyone be angry about someone asking where THEIR donation went? Why the pressure? Why the silence? 6/ That’s when I knew— This isn’t just about one donation. This is about something bigger. 7/ I was actually contacted about this last year. At the time, I didn’t act on it. Now I understand why it was brought to me. 8/ The more I look into this, the more questions come up. And the reactions I’ve received? Only confirm I’m on the right track. 9/ I’m not backing down. If you have nothing to hide, questions shouldn’t be a problem. 10/ Watch the video. Share it. Ask questions. Because I don’t think this story ends here. JD Vance please look into the nonprofit food distributions in Queens and the Bronx! JD Vance

Lattina Brown, MPA 🇯🇲🇺🇸

36,339 views • 4 months ago

We got sabotaged tonight in Queen’s Cup and I’ll be damned if it goes without being known. Over the years of me being in women’s comp any tweet I have made has ALWAYS been in support of the scene, but after the absolute lack of professionalism I was given today it’s time to air it out. Someone reported my teammate Nicky to be “cheating” and I will go ahead and attach the clip that was sent in to be proof. Spectator bug does not allow for you to see health bars and if you watch the clip from Ky’s vod you clearly see the health bar and me communicating and pinging where my teammates needed to be looking. Nicky looking where my ping was is what made ppl think she was cheating and instead of watching our vod went on a witch hunt. The kicker is that we weren’t contacted about it by staff at all, although a staff member from Women’s circuit spectated us on Thursday and then took it upon themself to go around to other players not in staff and voice that Nicky was 100% cheating. No bans, no proof. Just this clip. So, why didn’t they ask for Nicky to stream on Thursday if they were already spectating & thought she was cheating with the evidence that was sent in from earlier this week? Wish I knew. Instead, they waited until 2 minutes before the game started. They messaged Nicky 20 minutes before the game started but like any team we were 3v3ing/warming up prior. So 2 minutes before I get a DM telling me to have Nicky to check her DMs because they want to spectate her on the day of MP FINALS when they had all week to bring up their concerns about it. Not only that, but they send in a staff member who I personally do not get along with or feel comfortable with. We basically got sabotaged and no one on GrindSquad or Women’s Circuit wants to own up to who is at fault. Just wanted everyone else to know that we got ultimately fucked over today and this whole situation was handled poorly and I will probably never play in another women’s comp event ever again. You ALL should be ashamed of yourselves. All I will get is an apology, but the competitive integrity of this entire tournament is fucked. Congrats to all who got to play their game today without interference and was able to play it to the best of their ability.

We got sabotaged tonight in Queen’s Cup and I’ll be damned if it goes without being known. Over the years of me being in women’s comp any tweet I have made has ALWAYS been in support of the scene, but after the absolute lack of professionalism I was given today it’s time to air it out. Someone reported my teammate Nicky to be “cheating” and I will go ahead and attach the clip that was sent in to be proof. Spectator bug does not allow for you to see health bars and if you watch the clip from Ky’s vod you clearly see the health bar and me communicating and pinging where my teammates needed to be looking. Nicky looking where my ping was is what made ppl think she was cheating and instead of watching our vod went on a witch hunt. The kicker is that we weren’t contacted about it by staff at all, although a staff member from Women’s circuit spectated us on Thursday and then took it upon themself to go around to other players not in staff and voice that Nicky was 100% cheating. No bans, no proof. Just this clip. So, why didn’t they ask for Nicky to stream on Thursday if they were already spectating & thought she was cheating with the evidence that was sent in from earlier this week? Wish I knew. Instead, they waited until 2 minutes before the game started. They messaged Nicky 20 minutes before the game started but like any team we were 3v3ing/warming up prior. So 2 minutes before I get a DM telling me to have Nicky to check her DMs because they want to spectate her on the day of MP FINALS when they had all week to bring up their concerns about it. Not only that, but they send in a staff member who I personally do not get along with or feel comfortable with. We basically got sabotaged and no one on GrindSquad or Women’s Circuit wants to own up to who is at fault. Just wanted everyone else to know that we got ultimately fucked over today and this whole situation was handled poorly and I will probably never play in another women’s comp event ever again. You ALL should be ashamed of yourselves. All I will get is an apology, but the competitive integrity of this entire tournament is fucked. Congrats to all who got to play their game today without interference and was able to play it to the best of their ability.

cre .☘︎ ݁˖

52,601 views • 2 months ago

The funny thing about this Mercy Culture Church clip is that they had a Hebrew language scholar with them for the first two hours--they should have asked. Jezebel does not mean: UNSUBMITTED. 1. There is no word for submit in the Hebrew scriptures. In modern Hebrew, we use the word for surrender for submission. להיכנע So no, Jezebel cannot mean unsubmitted. 2. The way you say Jezebel in Hebrew is very different from English. There is no "J" in Hebrew. ē-zevel. אִיזֶבֶל. 3. The original name Jezebel means "Where is ba'al." That makes sense because she was a pagan queen who embraced Ba'al worship. eze (where is) baal (pagan god). It can also mean, "Where is the prince?" 4. There is folklore that her name was changed to make the second part, zevel, which means dung/trash, more pronounced. (see 2 Kings 9:37) Some scholars embrace this (See AYBD). 5. Her father was Ethba'al, which has the same ba'al pagan ending. So now… It absolutely does not mean unsummitted. To quote Dr. Michael Brown, when most people say 'it says this in the original Hebrew,' they're wrong. To be clear, Jezebel was unsubmitted, and that is a significant characteristic when referring to "a Jezebel spirit," which can influence a man or a woman.

The funny thing about this Mercy Culture Church clip is that they had a Hebrew language scholar with them for the first two hours--they should have asked. Jezebel does not mean: UNSUBMITTED. 1. There is no word for submit in the Hebrew scriptures. In modern Hebrew, we use the word for surrender for submission. להיכנע So no, Jezebel cannot mean unsubmitted. 2. The way you say Jezebel in Hebrew is very different from English. There is no "J" in Hebrew. ē-zevel. אִיזֶבֶל. 3. The original name Jezebel means "Where is ba'al." That makes sense because she was a pagan queen who embraced Ba'al worship. eze (where is) baal (pagan god). It can also mean, "Where is the prince?" 4. There is folklore that her name was changed to make the second part, zevel, which means dung/trash, more pronounced. (see 2 Kings 9:37) Some scholars embrace this (See AYBD). 5. Her father was Ethba'al, which has the same ba'al pagan ending. So now… It absolutely does not mean unsummitted. To quote Dr. Michael Brown, when most people say 'it says this in the original Hebrew,' they're wrong. To be clear, Jezebel was unsubmitted, and that is a significant characteristic when referring to "a Jezebel spirit," which can influence a man or a woman.

Ron Cantor

10,397 views • 1 year ago