Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🔥 Pokrovsk under siege. Ukraine launched two high‑risk Black Hawk missions into the city—already 80% controlled by Russian forces and nearly encircled. Both failed. * Seversk is on the verge of being operationally surrounded—every exit under Russian fire control. • Andrei Martyanov explains why: “It’s all about killing the...

21,030 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Pokrovsk Blackhawk Down: A Failed NATO Hot Extraction Masquerading as Heroism A recent helicopter-borne incident in the besieged Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk—now 85-90% under Russian control—has been spun into two competing propaganda narratives, both of which conveniently miss the real story. Russian channels dismiss it as Zelensky’s delusional PR stunt: a suicidal waste of elite Ukrainian special forces dropped into a meatgrinder for a photo-op. Ukrainian sources, meanwhile, frame it as a daring airborne assault to reinforce trapped defenders and defy the Russian advance. Both are wrong. Sending 12–16 special operators (even if they were super-soldiers) into a city already encircled and largely lost changes precisely nothing on the battlefield. It’s not a tide-turner; it’s not even a speed-bump. The only accurate part of the Russian take is the desperation—but the desperation wasn’t Ukraine’s. It was NATO’s. What actually crashed in Pokrovsk was a classic hot extraction: a last-ditch, high-risk helicopter insertion to pull out high-value Western personnel—senior NATO special-forces officers and intelligence operatives who had been embedded in a joint Ukrainian–NATO command post on the edge of the city. The mission failed spectacularly. The Blackhawk was downed, the rescue team was wiped out, and the very people they came to extract are now either dead or in Russian hands. Moscow has every incentive to parade proof of captured or killed NATO officers. Irrefutable evidence of direct NATO combat involvement inside Ukraine—especially at the operational command level—would be a strategic earthquake, shattering the West’s “we’re only sending weapons” narrative once and for all. Even the usually pro-Ukrainian German journalist Julian “Jihadi Julian” Röpcke accidentally let the cat out of the bag when he posted footage of the operation with the caption: > “Glimpse into the ‘battle for Pokrovsk.’ The entire video, airborne operation and battle of the GRU special unit is about 2-3 occupied buildings that are technically not even inside the city limits. Gives an impression of what ‘would’ be needed to liberate the city. Won’t happen.” Those “2-3 occupied buildings” weren’t random strongpoints. They were the forward joint command center housing the NATO liaison team and senior Ukrainian officers coordinating the defense. Pokrovsk isn’t just another dot on the map. Its fall severs critical supply lines, cripples Ukraine’s steel industry (and thus its already strangled war economy), and collapses the entire Donetsk defensive front. Once it goes, the dominoes fall fast—Slovyansk, Kramatorsk, and the whole house of cards comes down. In military terms: FUBAR, followed by a fresh Russian-made meatgrinder for whatever forces Kyiv scrapes together for a counter-attack. This wasn’t about saving Pokrovsk. It was about saving NATO’s plausible deniability. And it failed. Credit > UK Military expert.

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹🔻🔻🔻

40,293 views • 9 months ago

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦UKRAINE WAR 12-HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) claims to have foiled a plot by Ukrainian and British intelligence to recruit Russian pilots to steal a MiG‑31 fighter jet armed with a Kinzhal missile. 2. Russian forces claim deeper advances into the eastern Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk and near Kupiansk, showing video of “Mad Max”‑style vehicles entering Pokrovsk. Ukraine contests the full encirclement. 3. Ukraine reports a major corruption investigation: five people detained, seven suspects identified in a $100 M energy‑sector kickback scheme tied to the national atomic company Energoatom. 4. Ukraine’s defence intelligence says that over 600 Russian troops from the Central Military District have died in the past two years due to non‑combat causes such as drug abuse, food poisoning and suicide. 5. Russia claims to have taken parts of Pokrovsk, which it calls the “gateway to Donetsk,” with around 300 Russian troops reportedly inside the city; meanwhile, Ukraine says it is holding supply lines to Myrnohrad. 6. In the eastern Myrnohrad area near Pokrovsk, Ukraine reports heavy battles and says logistics are “challenging but ongoing”; Russia claims to have captured two districts of the town. 7. Russia’s push in the Donetsk region is described as involving around 150,000 troops concentrated in the drive to capture Pokrovsk. 8. Russia accuses Ukraine and Britain of planning a “large‑scale provocation” by hijacking a fighter jet to be flown into NATO territory, signaling broader espionage and intelligence escalation in the conflict. 9. Ukraine’s anti‑corruption probe explicitly links the energy‑infrastructure war (ongoing Russian attacks on power/energy infrastructure) with internal vulnerabilities and the need for clean governance to bolster war‑resilience. 10. During his visit to Kherson, Zelensky awarded Andry, a volunteer who evacuates civilians from the zero line, risking his own life every day.

Mario Nawfal

103,288 views • 9 months ago