Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Policy Leaders Push Pocket Rescission Plan to Enforce Cuts Without Senate Approval Key fiscal experts are backing a strategy that would cancel unused funds automatically. If a rescission package is submitted after August 18th, the President Donald J. Trump can withhold that money for 45 days — pushing it...

RealLindellTV's profile picture

LindellTV

24,458 subscribers

14,689 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & PoliticsFinance
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

On CNN, Russ Vought briefly mentioned an important but rarely used statutory process provided to a president, known as a “pocket” rescission. Once you understand what a pocket rescission is, you’ll understand it as the smoothest path towards attaining the vast majority of DOGE cuts. Normally, when a rescission package is submitted to Congress, as one will likely be tomorrow, a president has the statutory authority to withhold those funds for 45 days (measured in days that Congress isn’t in recess. ) We should fully support that rescission package because if all or some of it fails, or Congress doesn’t act on the package within those 45 days, the package fails and we lose the ability to use the rescission process to attain those cuts later. On the other hand, a “pocket” rescission is a rescissions package submitted within 45 days of the end of the fiscal year. If a rescission package is submitted within that window, the statutory authority of a president to withhold those funds take us past September 30th, the end of the fiscal year. At that point, the budget authority to expend fy25 funds lapses. The rescission is therefore automatic. Once you understand this, it’s the the ideal strategy for attaining the DOGE cuts because it gives Congress the ability to affirm the process by voting in support of the rescission, but it also moves forward automatically. It’s a win-win. But it requires that the rescission packages be submitted after roughly August 18th. Demanding more DOGE cuts NOW, and urging movement on them now, jeopardizes the process. We should be asking for all future rescissions packages on DOGE cuts to wait until AFTER roughly August 18th.
1:30

On CNN, Russ Vought briefly mentioned an important but rarely used statutory process provided to a president, known as a “pocket” rescission. Once you understand what a pocket rescission is, you’ll understand it as the smoothest path towards attaining the vast majority of DOGE cuts. Normally, when a rescission package is submitted to Congress, as one will likely be tomorrow, a president has the statutory authority to withhold those funds for 45 days (measured in days that Congress isn’t in recess. ) We should fully support that rescission package because if all or some of it fails, or Congress doesn’t act on the package within those 45 days, the package fails and we lose the ability to use the rescission process to attain those cuts later. On the other hand, a “pocket” rescission is a rescissions package submitted within 45 days of the end of the fiscal year. If a rescission package is submitted within that window, the statutory authority of a president to withhold those funds take us past September 30th, the end of the fiscal year. At that point, the budget authority to expend fy25 funds lapses. The rescission is therefore automatic. Once you understand this, it’s the the ideal strategy for attaining the DOGE cuts because it gives Congress the ability to affirm the process by voting in support of the rescission, but it also moves forward automatically. It’s a win-win. But it requires that the rescission packages be submitted after roughly August 18th. Demanding more DOGE cuts NOW, and urging movement on them now, jeopardizes the process. We should be asking for all future rescissions packages on DOGE cuts to wait until AFTER roughly August 18th.

Wade Miller

18,683 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸 SEN KENNEDY: RATE CUTS MEAN NOTHING IF CONGRESS KEEPS BURNING CASH "Monetary policy is important, and the Fed is in charge of it. But monetary policy is not the only thing that’s important; fiscal policy matters too. I don’t care how low the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates. If the U.S. Congress is profligate in its spending, if it throws money around like it’s pond water, if it runs up $37 trillion in debt and deficit spends to the tune of 7% every year, that also impacts employment, economic growth, and inflation. In fact, the Federal Reserve can lower short-term rates through the Open Market Committee all it wants. But that doesn’t necessarily mean long-term rates, 10 years and above, are going to go down. Because the bond market counts too. You can lower rates as much as you want, but if the bond market thinks inflation is on the horizon, those long-term rates are going to keep going up, or at least stay steady." Source: John Kennedy
1:40

🇺🇸 SEN KENNEDY: RATE CUTS MEAN NOTHING IF CONGRESS KEEPS BURNING CASH "Monetary policy is important, and the Fed is in charge of it. But monetary policy is not the only thing that’s important; fiscal policy matters too. I don’t care how low the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates. If the U.S. Congress is profligate in its spending, if it throws money around like it’s pond water, if it runs up $37 trillion in debt and deficit spends to the tune of 7% every year, that also impacts employment, economic growth, and inflation. In fact, the Federal Reserve can lower short-term rates through the Open Market Committee all it wants. But that doesn’t necessarily mean long-term rates, 10 years and above, are going to go down. Because the bond market counts too. You can lower rates as much as you want, but if the bond market thinks inflation is on the horizon, those long-term rates are going to keep going up, or at least stay steady." Source: John Kennedy

Mario Nawfal

40,547 views • 11 months ago

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Trump has inherited a “turd of an economy,” and when things “roll over,” he’ll be the one blamed for it. This dire news comes from COVID vaccine data analyst and former BlackRock asset manager Ed Dowd. Dowd predicts things could “unravel anytime between now and March.” And if the incoming Trump administration doesn’t “get out in front of the narrative,” then they are “going to get blamed for what is coming.” According to Dowd, America should have already entered a recession by “the second half of 2023.” However, “The government went on a spending spree... which gave the economy a bit more life.” “The real economy (not the stock market) has been rolling over,” Dowd lamented, “and we’re just waiting for the financial markets to figure this out. They will. And when they do, unfortunately, Trump will inherit turd of a financial market crisis.” Dowd added that he has insights into “some interesting indicators” that suggest the economy has “nowhere to go but the other direction [down].” Although the short-term economic future looks grim, Dowd mentioned some “good news.” And the good news is that Trump is the incoming president. Under Trump’s leadership, Dowd believes, the looming financial mess can be dealt with much better than if Harris won the office. “Now, the good news is that Trump is in office, and his policies will be far better than under the Biden administration. If Harris had won, I’d be far gloomier. There will be pain, but I believe it can be mitigated somewhat,” Edward Dowd said. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
5:44

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Trump has inherited a “turd of an economy,” and when things “roll over,” he’ll be the one blamed for it. This dire news comes from COVID vaccine data analyst and former BlackRock asset manager Ed Dowd. Dowd predicts things could “unravel anytime between now and March.” And if the incoming Trump administration doesn’t “get out in front of the narrative,” then they are “going to get blamed for what is coming.” According to Dowd, America should have already entered a recession by “the second half of 2023.” However, “The government went on a spending spree... which gave the economy a bit more life.” “The real economy (not the stock market) has been rolling over,” Dowd lamented, “and we’re just waiting for the financial markets to figure this out. They will. And when they do, unfortunately, Trump will inherit turd of a financial market crisis.” Dowd added that he has insights into “some interesting indicators” that suggest the economy has “nowhere to go but the other direction [down].” Although the short-term economic future looks grim, Dowd mentioned some “good news.” And the good news is that Trump is the incoming president. Under Trump’s leadership, Dowd believes, the looming financial mess can be dealt with much better than if Harris won the office. “Now, the good news is that Trump is in office, and his policies will be far better than under the Biden administration. If Harris had won, I’d be far gloomier. There will be pain, but I believe it can be mitigated somewhat,” Edward Dowd said. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,426,166 views • 1 year ago

NEXT-LEVEL INTEL: "TRUMP IS GOING TO OWN WHAT'S COMING!"📉 AI Stock Market Bubble, Oil Price Shock, Job Crisis In China, & A New Fed Chair Are The Perfect Storm For A Global Economic Catastrophe! "How Do You Distract From This Coming Crisis? War, Aliens, Pandemics, You Name It! That's Why You See All This Madness & Mayhem!" World-Renowned Economic Forecaster Edward Dowd Breaks Life-Changing Intel On What To Expect In The Markets As Well As The Latest Hantavirus News, Trump Admin Intel, UFO Disclosure, And SO MUCH MORE! "We Have To Have Some Short Term Pain For Long Term Gain, But There Seems To Be No Appetite For Any Short Term Pain In This Admin!" THIS IS A MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW WITH EDWARD DOWD & ALEX JONES! Edward Dowd 🔴WATCH/SHARE ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:
1:01:59

NEXT-LEVEL INTEL: "TRUMP IS GOING TO OWN WHAT'S COMING!"📉 AI Stock Market Bubble, Oil Price Shock, Job Crisis In China, & A New Fed Chair Are The Perfect Storm For A Global Economic Catastrophe! "How Do You Distract From This Coming Crisis? War, Aliens, Pandemics, You Name It! That's Why You See All This Madness & Mayhem!" World-Renowned Economic Forecaster Edward Dowd Breaks Life-Changing Intel On What To Expect In The Markets As Well As The Latest Hantavirus News, Trump Admin Intel, UFO Disclosure, And SO MUCH MORE! "We Have To Have Some Short Term Pain For Long Term Gain, But There Seems To Be No Appetite For Any Short Term Pain In This Admin!" THIS IS A MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW WITH EDWARD DOWD & ALEX JONES! Edward Dowd 🔴WATCH/SHARE ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:

Alex Jones

411,725 views • 3 months ago

NOW: Sen. Ron Johnson blasts House Republicans for failing to codify DOGE spending cuts into law. No one else is asking the question—but Senator Ron Johnson is sounding the alarm. “I would ask the question: where are the rescission packages so we can codify the DOGE savings?” “I’m listening to Elon Musk over the weekend, pretty disappointed in this House package as well.” “If I were him and all the work he put into DOGE, and yeah, we maybe stop spending the money, but I don’t know if they can eliminate it by impoundment—that’s going to be subject to the courts.” “We need to actually incorporate that into rescission packages so we can eliminate that, that spending DOGE found out.” “Again, I am not sure all DOGE savings were strictly discretionary. Maybe some of that is in mandatory spending as well, but we’re not getting the information from the administration.” “And we certainly haven’t gotten a rescission package yet.” “Well DOGE was brilliant, and that was a combination of Elon Musk and President Trump—but where’s President Trump been in terms of putting pressure on the House to actually codify those rescissions?”
1:19

NOW: Sen. Ron Johnson blasts House Republicans for failing to codify DOGE spending cuts into law. No one else is asking the question—but Senator Ron Johnson is sounding the alarm. “I would ask the question: where are the rescission packages so we can codify the DOGE savings?” “I’m listening to Elon Musk over the weekend, pretty disappointed in this House package as well.” “If I were him and all the work he put into DOGE, and yeah, we maybe stop spending the money, but I don’t know if they can eliminate it by impoundment—that’s going to be subject to the courts.” “We need to actually incorporate that into rescission packages so we can eliminate that, that spending DOGE found out.” “Again, I am not sure all DOGE savings were strictly discretionary. Maybe some of that is in mandatory spending as well, but we’re not getting the information from the administration.” “And we certainly haven’t gotten a rescission package yet.” “Well DOGE was brilliant, and that was a combination of Elon Musk and President Trump—but where’s President Trump been in terms of putting pressure on the House to actually codify those rescissions?”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

86,836 views • 1 year ago

Burry is not wrong about $ADBE. I think he's a bit early but in the end I think he will be proven right. Adobe management is giving up short term gains in order to maintain long term dominance over its respective industry. The market did not like that and thus sold it off. I believe Adobe is a generational buying opportunity for those that can withstand the short term pain and look beyond the next 6 to 12 months. Same with alot of other SaaS names. The key will be patience and persistence. Value investing is one of the hardest things to do when investing because there aren't nearly as many regular dopamine hits as someone who purely chases themes that are in upwards movements.
3:50

Burry is not wrong about $ADBE. I think he's a bit early but in the end I think he will be proven right. Adobe management is giving up short term gains in order to maintain long term dominance over its respective industry. The market did not like that and thus sold it off. I believe Adobe is a generational buying opportunity for those that can withstand the short term pain and look beyond the next 6 to 12 months. Same with alot of other SaaS names. The key will be patience and persistence. Value investing is one of the hardest things to do when investing because there aren't nearly as many regular dopamine hits as someone who purely chases themes that are in upwards movements.

Kris Patel 🇺🇸

90,616 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Davos Distraction? Ed Dowd Says Denmark's Treasury Threat Masks Bigger Collapse At the World Economic Forum, some European officials are calling for Denmark to ditch US treasuries "out of spite" over the Greenland controversy. “This is just noise... It’ll be absorbed quickly. Treasuries will be one of the best-performing assets by the end of 2026.” - Edward Dowd He warns the real story isn’t Denmark - it’s a collapsing debt system, demographic decline, and a new global order already underway. “This is the new chessboard. President Donald J. Trump knows it. The real power struggle is just beginning.”
2:34

🚨 Davos Distraction? Ed Dowd Says Denmark's Treasury Threat Masks Bigger Collapse At the World Economic Forum, some European officials are calling for Denmark to ditch US treasuries "out of spite" over the Greenland controversy. “This is just noise... It’ll be absorbed quickly. Treasuries will be one of the best-performing assets by the end of 2026.” - Edward Dowd He warns the real story isn’t Denmark - it’s a collapsing debt system, demographic decline, and a new global order already underway. “This is the new chessboard. President Donald J. Trump knows it. The real power struggle is just beginning.”

LindellTV

42,200 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk: The long-term value of SpaceX is immense – it’s just beyond the planning horizon of most investors. WSJ: “Who's going to pay for [the Mars colonization]? Are your investors going to put the money up to do that?” Elon: “I think long-term, the value of it will be incredibly high. It's just beyond the planning horizon of most people or most investors. Obviously, if there's a thriving city on Mars and there's a lot of interplanetary commerce and SpaceX is the primary provider of that, it would be immensely valuable.” Interview with the WSJ, May 2023
0:29

Elon Musk: The long-term value of SpaceX is immense – it’s just beyond the planning horizon of most investors. WSJ: “Who's going to pay for [the Mars colonization]? Are your investors going to put the money up to do that?” Elon: “I think long-term, the value of it will be incredibly high. It's just beyond the planning horizon of most people or most investors. Obviously, if there's a thriving city on Mars and there's a lot of interplanetary commerce and SpaceX is the primary provider of that, it would be immensely valuable.” Interview with the WSJ, May 2023

ELON CLIPS

39,678 views • 2 months ago

the long bond is breaking ranks and equity bulls are entirely ignoring the mechanic. everybody is begging the Fed for cuts to save their bags. they dont realize the bond vigilantes just took the wheel on the back end of the curve. straight out of 1994. back then the market mutinied and ripped the 30-year Treasury yield from 5.8% to over 8% in under a year. the Fed completely lost control. leveraged funds got vaporized. we are watching the exact same duration mutiny form right now. megacap tech is masking the rot while small caps are already choking on the cost of capital. retail is sitting long on automakers and new construction trusts assuming short rate cuts will act as an instant bailout. lower short rates do absolutely nothing for you if the long end refuses to catch a bid. the trigger hits 12 to 18 months from now. political panic over frozen auto and home sales will force Congress to demand aggressive cuts. when the Fed slashes but the long bond throws a tantrum and yields spike anyway, the private credit market freezes solid.
1:41

the long bond is breaking ranks and equity bulls are entirely ignoring the mechanic. everybody is begging the Fed for cuts to save their bags. they dont realize the bond vigilantes just took the wheel on the back end of the curve. straight out of 1994. back then the market mutinied and ripped the 30-year Treasury yield from 5.8% to over 8% in under a year. the Fed completely lost control. leveraged funds got vaporized. we are watching the exact same duration mutiny form right now. megacap tech is masking the rot while small caps are already choking on the cost of capital. retail is sitting long on automakers and new construction trusts assuming short rate cuts will act as an instant bailout. lower short rates do absolutely nothing for you if the long end refuses to catch a bid. the trigger hits 12 to 18 months from now. political panic over frozen auto and home sales will force Congress to demand aggressive cuts. when the Fed slashes but the long bond throws a tantrum and yields spike anyway, the private credit market freezes solid.

Macro Alpha

14,076 views • 1 month ago

More warnings from high-level russian officials, translated video below. Yesterday, Moscow Exchange Supervisory Board Chairman Shvetsov said the "military budget" will be a problem for 5-8 years because after this war ends "they will prepare for the next war", it's "an illusion" that the 2021 budget will return and rates will remain high long-term. This is why economic and drone sanctions are critical alongside direct support for Ukraine from our allies. The invaders need to be forced to stop now, because they are already openly planning "the next war".
0:54

More warnings from high-level russian officials, translated video below. Yesterday, Moscow Exchange Supervisory Board Chairman Shvetsov said the "military budget" will be a problem for 5-8 years because after this war ends "they will prepare for the next war", it's "an illusion" that the 2021 budget will return and rates will remain high long-term. This is why economic and drone sanctions are critical alongside direct support for Ukraine from our allies. The invaders need to be forced to stop now, because they are already openly planning "the next war".

Maria Drutska 🇺🇦

81,867 views • 10 months ago

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey on Competing with Legacy Defense Primes: “They would say Anduril was never gonna work… then all of a sudden we’re delivering the Air Force their first autonomous fighter jet.” “A lot of our competitors are now saying: ‘We can’t do what Anduril does… and if you try to make us, if you force us to invest like that, to take the risk, then we are going to fail.’” “To me this is a crazy strategy. In the short term it might convince a congressman: ‘We need to keep this manufacturing facility going, because if we don’t subsidize it, it will disappear and that would be bad for national security.’” “The long-term effect is you’re telling everyone in DC that you’re not as good as Anduril.” “[The legacy primes] are shooting themselves in the knees to get emergency healthcare… it is a bad long-term strategy, even if it gets you into the hospital.”
1:26

Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey on Competing with Legacy Defense Primes: “They would say Anduril was never gonna work… then all of a sudden we’re delivering the Air Force their first autonomous fighter jet.” “A lot of our competitors are now saying: ‘We can’t do what Anduril does… and if you try to make us, if you force us to invest like that, to take the risk, then we are going to fail.’” “To me this is a crazy strategy. In the short term it might convince a congressman: ‘We need to keep this manufacturing facility going, because if we don’t subsidize it, it will disappear and that would be bad for national security.’” “The long-term effect is you’re telling everyone in DC that you’re not as good as Anduril.” “[The legacy primes] are shooting themselves in the knees to get emergency healthcare… it is a bad long-term strategy, even if it gets you into the hospital.”

Anduril Appreciator

112,498 views • 6 months ago

This is President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe saying that he has no desire to do more that 2 terns in office, that was in January 2018 talking to Richard Quest on CNN. It is a public secret that the Third Term movement is already in motion. What you need to know is that a Third Term at law is illegal for President Mnangagwa, it is unconstitutional! The constitution of Zimbabwe clearly states that to remove presidential term limits, you must have a referendum first. Even if that referendum happens and voters agree to the removal of term limits, the current President can’t benefit from such a move, it will be illegal. Only his successor can benefit. Sadly there is an illegal and unconstitutional precedent that was set, Chief Justice Luke Malaba is currently in his position illegally and unconstitutionally, they broke the constitution by giving him another term. The constitution was clear that the current Chief Justice couldn’t benefit from a change of the law, it would only benefit his successor. So be prepared for another constitutional violation, President Mnangagwa’s supporters have already pushing for a Third Term, and knowing Zimbabweans and Zimbabwe, he will get it the same way Malaba got back illegally and unconditionally!
0:41

This is President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe saying that he has no desire to do more that 2 terns in office, that was in January 2018 talking to Richard Quest on CNN. It is a public secret that the Third Term movement is already in motion. What you need to know is that a Third Term at law is illegal for President Mnangagwa, it is unconstitutional! The constitution of Zimbabwe clearly states that to remove presidential term limits, you must have a referendum first. Even if that referendum happens and voters agree to the removal of term limits, the current President can’t benefit from such a move, it will be illegal. Only his successor can benefit. Sadly there is an illegal and unconstitutional precedent that was set, Chief Justice Luke Malaba is currently in his position illegally and unconstitutionally, they broke the constitution by giving him another term. The constitution was clear that the current Chief Justice couldn’t benefit from a change of the law, it would only benefit his successor. So be prepared for another constitutional violation, President Mnangagwa’s supporters have already pushing for a Third Term, and knowing Zimbabweans and Zimbabwe, he will get it the same way Malaba got back illegally and unconditionally!

Hopewell Chin’ono

124,027 views • 2 years ago

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. CANNOT BE TRUSTED - LONG TERM, INSTABILITY IS COMING" The U.S. just pulled off a lightning-fast takedown of Maduro, and the world is watching closely. According to Alex Christoforou, no country can trust the U.S. Russia, China, Iran: all taking notes. Trump is already calling it a win, but Alex says long-term chaos in Venezuela is inevitable. The operation was fast, clean, and deadly quiet. But instability is coming, and America might not be ready for the fallout this time. "What every country is going to be saying is that the United States cannot be trusted. Russia is going to take notice of this. China is going to take notice of this. Every country is going to take notice of this. Netanyahu was in Mar-a-Lago just the other day and he was selling Trump on a round 2 conflict against Iran. Long term, most likely you’re going to get a lot of instability. In the short term, Trump is going to position this as a victory, and it is a victory. It was fast. It was quick. From what we’re getting, no casualties." Alex Christoforou
1:21

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. CANNOT BE TRUSTED - LONG TERM, INSTABILITY IS COMING" The U.S. just pulled off a lightning-fast takedown of Maduro, and the world is watching closely. According to Alex Christoforou, no country can trust the U.S. Russia, China, Iran: all taking notes. Trump is already calling it a win, but Alex says long-term chaos in Venezuela is inevitable. The operation was fast, clean, and deadly quiet. But instability is coming, and America might not be ready for the fallout this time. "What every country is going to be saying is that the United States cannot be trusted. Russia is going to take notice of this. China is going to take notice of this. Every country is going to take notice of this. Netanyahu was in Mar-a-Lago just the other day and he was selling Trump on a round 2 conflict against Iran. Long term, most likely you’re going to get a lot of instability. In the short term, Trump is going to position this as a victory, and it is a victory. It was fast. It was quick. From what we’re getting, no casualties." Alex Christoforou

Mario Nawfal

125,962 views • 7 months ago

Member of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), who voted against a long-term extension of FISA – a key surveillance authority that allows U.S. intelligence agencies to spy on foreigners without a warrant – says he is “not willing to give a very long runway to this administration on a very powerful intelligence tool, when they have routinely shown to the American people, and to us, that they violate the law and don't respect the law.” “I will do a short-term extension, and then, we will oversee that program…I will look at it hard every single month,” he says. “And if they're abusing it, if they're straying from the law, then we pull it back.”
2:02

Member of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), who voted against a long-term extension of FISA – a key surveillance authority that allows U.S. intelligence agencies to spy on foreigners without a warrant – says he is “not willing to give a very long runway to this administration on a very powerful intelligence tool, when they have routinely shown to the American people, and to us, that they violate the law and don't respect the law.” “I will do a short-term extension, and then, we will oversee that program…I will look at it hard every single month,” he says. “And if they're abusing it, if they're straying from the law, then we pull it back.”

Face The Nation

20,661 views • 3 months ago

VIDEO | Delhi: “First objection is you are calling the Parliament for a revolutionary thing in favour of women's representation. Do it. Why link it to other things? Why link it to delimitation? Why link it to census? So my first objection is women are being used as a shield for something altogether different and sinister. This is very cynical. The government has been saying that the delimitation that they would bring will maintain the current ratio or proportion of each state. This is not what the bill says. It's completely against what the government has been promising... So this is cheating. And number three, fundamentally, this kind of delimitation, which changes the composition of the parliament in the manner in which it is being suggested, is not in the long-term interest of this country. I do not speak as a North Indian or a South Indian, not as a supporter or opponent of this government. After 100 years, none of us would be here. But our children would be here. India will still be here. Let us not do something which goes against long-term unity and integrity of this country. And this bill has that danger... Unfortunately, for the short-term electoral gains, this government is compromising the long-term unity and integrity of this country,” says political activist Yogendra Yadav after a Congress meeting on the women’s quota and delimitation. (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:14

VIDEO | Delhi: “First objection is you are calling the Parliament for a revolutionary thing in favour of women's representation. Do it. Why link it to other things? Why link it to delimitation? Why link it to census? So my first objection is women are being used as a shield for something altogether different and sinister. This is very cynical. The government has been saying that the delimitation that they would bring will maintain the current ratio or proportion of each state. This is not what the bill says. It's completely against what the government has been promising... So this is cheating. And number three, fundamentally, this kind of delimitation, which changes the composition of the parliament in the manner in which it is being suggested, is not in the long-term interest of this country. I do not speak as a North Indian or a South Indian, not as a supporter or opponent of this government. After 100 years, none of us would be here. But our children would be here. India will still be here. Let us not do something which goes against long-term unity and integrity of this country. And this bill has that danger... Unfortunately, for the short-term electoral gains, this government is compromising the long-term unity and integrity of this country,” says political activist Yogendra Yadav after a Congress meeting on the women’s quota and delimitation. (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

59,653 views • 3 months ago

I wanted to share an update on San Francisco’s budget and how we are working to get our fiscal house in order. When I took office, we inherited a significant structural deficit. That means the city was set up to spend more money than it brings in, year after year. Today, that gap is projected to reach $1 billion dollars over the next five years. Over the past year, we’ve taken steps to close this gap and bring long-term spending more in line with revenue. We also know that increasing sustainable revenue for our city is crucial to solving our budget problem. Since the day I became mayor, we’ve been taking steps to create the conditions for San Francisco’s economic recovery. Today, our streets are safer and cleaner, and people struggling on the streets are getting into treatment. We’re making it easier to open and operate a small business in our city. And that progress has led to results: Businesses of all sizes are coming back to San Francisco, people are shopping downtown again, and tax revenues are higher than projected. While we are making meaningful progress, we are not out of the woods. Our economic recovery is very fragile. And since last year’s budget, the city has faced new federal and state funding cuts. This means our budget gap would reach $1 billion in the coming years if we don’t act. The charter requires that, as mayor, I submit a balanced budget each June—we cannot spend more money than we bring in. And we must also address this long-term $1 billion dollar deficit. Because if we don’t act now, we will have to do twice as much in the coming years, with the choices becoming more expensive and more difficult. This year’s budget will include painful but necessary decisions. I know they will impact individuals and communities, and I take this seriously—which is why we must act now to avoid even deeper cuts later. This year's budget will continue the work we’ve been doing since last year to manage city funds responsibly and deliver the best possible services. And it will put our city on a path to a lasting economic recovery that benefits all San Franciscans.
2:37

I wanted to share an update on San Francisco’s budget and how we are working to get our fiscal house in order. When I took office, we inherited a significant structural deficit. That means the city was set up to spend more money than it brings in, year after year. Today, that gap is projected to reach $1 billion dollars over the next five years. Over the past year, we’ve taken steps to close this gap and bring long-term spending more in line with revenue. We also know that increasing sustainable revenue for our city is crucial to solving our budget problem. Since the day I became mayor, we’ve been taking steps to create the conditions for San Francisco’s economic recovery. Today, our streets are safer and cleaner, and people struggling on the streets are getting into treatment. We’re making it easier to open and operate a small business in our city. And that progress has led to results: Businesses of all sizes are coming back to San Francisco, people are shopping downtown again, and tax revenues are higher than projected. While we are making meaningful progress, we are not out of the woods. Our economic recovery is very fragile. And since last year’s budget, the city has faced new federal and state funding cuts. This means our budget gap would reach $1 billion in the coming years if we don’t act. The charter requires that, as mayor, I submit a balanced budget each June—we cannot spend more money than we bring in. And we must also address this long-term $1 billion dollar deficit. Because if we don’t act now, we will have to do twice as much in the coming years, with the choices becoming more expensive and more difficult. This year’s budget will include painful but necessary decisions. I know they will impact individuals and communities, and I take this seriously—which is why we must act now to avoid even deeper cuts later. This year's budget will continue the work we’ve been doing since last year to manage city funds responsibly and deliver the best possible services. And it will put our city on a path to a lasting economic recovery that benefits all San Franciscans.

Daniel Lurie 丹尼爾·羅偉

39,270 views • 4 months ago

This money expert says there are no short-term traders consistently outperforming the market over a period of 5+ years. ''It is so rare that anyone can outperform the market. It just doesn't happen.'' ''People that say they swing trade the S&P500 Futures and consistently outperform the market, please go raise a hedge fund because you will be a billionaire.'' ''FOREX is an efficient market, man. Smartest people in the world who's entire job is to outperform the markets, and a basket of hedge funds did not outperform the S&P500 Index.''
1:33

This money expert says there are no short-term traders consistently outperforming the market over a period of 5+ years. ''It is so rare that anyone can outperform the market. It just doesn't happen.'' ''People that say they swing trade the S&P500 Futures and consistently outperform the market, please go raise a hedge fund because you will be a billionaire.'' ''FOREX is an efficient market, man. Smartest people in the world who's entire job is to outperform the markets, and a basket of hedge funds did not outperform the S&P500 Index.''

The Honest Trader

40,393 views • 2 months ago

JD Vance on Iran: Iran doesn't get a dime of money unless they perform their obligations. And the money that we're talking about is fundamentally sanctions relief. We're not giving them American money—not a single dollar of American money will go to Iran. We are willing to give significant sanctions relief if the Iranians make the kind of long-term commitments that are necessary to be a normal country, to give up their nuclear weapons program, and to stop funding terrorist activities all over the Middle East.
0:34

JD Vance on Iran: Iran doesn't get a dime of money unless they perform their obligations. And the money that we're talking about is fundamentally sanctions relief. We're not giving them American money—not a single dollar of American money will go to Iran. We are willing to give significant sanctions relief if the Iranians make the kind of long-term commitments that are necessary to be a normal country, to give up their nuclear weapons program, and to stop funding terrorist activities all over the Middle East.

Clash Report

54,838 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: JD VANCE ON IRAN DEAL: “Iran doesn't get a dime of money unless they perform their obligations. And the money that we're talking about is fundamentally sanctions relief. We're not giving them American money not a single dollar of American money will go to Iran. We are willing to give significant sanctions relief if the Iranians make the kind of long-term commitments that are necessary to be a normal country, to give up their nuclear weapons program, and to stop funding terrorist activities all over the Middle East.”
0:34

BREAKING: JD VANCE ON IRAN DEAL: “Iran doesn't get a dime of money unless they perform their obligations. And the money that we're talking about is fundamentally sanctions relief. We're not giving them American money not a single dollar of American money will go to Iran. We are willing to give significant sanctions relief if the Iranians make the kind of long-term commitments that are necessary to be a normal country, to give up their nuclear weapons program, and to stop funding terrorist activities all over the Middle East.”

Sulaiman Ahmed

149,704 views • 1 month ago