正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

polymarket has a manipulation problem nobody talks about UMA holders can literally propose any resolution even if it doesn't match what actually happened here's how they pulled it off market: "will the US launch a ground operation against cartels in mexico by january 31" the market dropped to 1c...

ramperxx's profile picture

ramper

1,551 subscribers

30,409 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This community note is WRONG Not only does it link to the wrong resolution, but it falsely claims that the US Senate did not unanimously pass a resolution to mark October 14th as ‘‘National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk’’ Video of the vote: "The resolution is adopted." Please downvote
1:01

This community note is WRONG Not only does it link to the wrong resolution, but it falsely claims that the US Senate did not unanimously pass a resolution to mark October 14th as ‘‘National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk’’ Video of the vote: "The resolution is adopted." Please downvote

Libs of TikTok

158,825 次观看 • 9 个月前

Breaking🚨: Merz says "disillusioned" with US and Israel over Iran. "At this point I am disillusioned simply because the US and Israel claimed at the beginning that they could solve this problem within days. Now I must recognize: It is not solved." Said Germany and EU also have "own European ideas on how to get to a resolution of the conflict." Will continue own diplomatic efforts in coordination with US. This was the second public criticism of US by Merz in one day. Earlier Merz said about US in Iran: "an entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership".
0:41

Breaking🚨: Merz says "disillusioned" with US and Israel over Iran. "At this point I am disillusioned simply because the US and Israel claimed at the beginning that they could solve this problem within days. Now I must recognize: It is not solved." Said Germany and EU also have "own European ideas on how to get to a resolution of the conflict." Will continue own diplomatic efforts in coordination with US. This was the second public criticism of US by Merz in one day. Earlier Merz said about US in Iran: "an entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership".

Michaela Kuefner

297,392 次观看 • 2 个月前

China doesn't think the resolution is balanced. It doesn't even touch upon the root cause of the situation, but instead only accuses #Iran in a very unbalanced manner. In particular, the timing is very bad. We have all heard what the US President has said. Against this background, we think it is extremely dangerous for the Security Council to adopt a resolution like this.
0:34

China doesn't think the resolution is balanced. It doesn't even touch upon the root cause of the situation, but instead only accuses #Iran in a very unbalanced manner. In particular, the timing is very bad. We have all heard what the US President has said. Against this background, we think it is extremely dangerous for the Security Council to adopt a resolution like this.

FU Cong 傅聪

715,285 次观看 • 2 个月前

BREAKING: Senator Kennedy just introduced a resolution that would PREVENT members of Congress from collecting a paycheck during a shutdown. "This resolution is about SHARED SACRIFICE," and says that he doesn't want to punish anyone by offering this, but Democrats LOVE to punish everyone they can if they think it hurts Trump too. The left has USED the leverage of pain trying to beat Trump. Their TDS is so severe that they have NO REGARD for how their actions hurt us.
4:43

BREAKING: Senator Kennedy just introduced a resolution that would PREVENT members of Congress from collecting a paycheck during a shutdown. "This resolution is about SHARED SACRIFICE," and says that he doesn't want to punish anyone by offering this, but Democrats LOVE to punish everyone they can if they think it hurts Trump too. The left has USED the leverage of pain trying to beat Trump. Their TDS is so severe that they have NO REGARD for how their actions hurt us.

Gunther Eagleman™

20,979 次观看 • 3 个月前

There's a way to win on Polymarket no matter who wins. Buy YES in one place, NO in another. If they don't add up to a dollar, you locked a profit. Before the event even happens. Here's how the arbitrage actually works and how to master it: This is the closest thing to free money on Polymarket. Every market has a YES and a NO. One of them MUST resolve to $1. The other goes to zero. So in theory, YES + NO should always cost exactly $1. But in thin or messy markets, they don't. Sometimes you can buy: > YES at 0.48 > NO at 0.49 > total cost: 0.97 This guy does it every day: [ He also uploaded a full guide on how to build the same bot. One side pays you $1 at resolution no matter what. He spends 97 cents to guarantee a dollar. That 3 cents is locked, risk-free. There's also the cross-market version. The same event sometimes has two separate markets at different prices. Buy the cheap YES in one, the cheap NO in the other, and pocket the gap. Sounds easy, right? But here's the honest part: These gaps close in about 2.7 seconds now. By the time you click by hand, a bot already took it. So the manual version only really survives in low-liquidity markets the bots ignore. The fast version? That lives in compiled code with a VPS sitting next to the exchange. If you can code, this is one of the cleanest edges i know. If you can't, stick to the thin markets where speed matters less. Good luck!
0:40

There's a way to win on Polymarket no matter who wins. Buy YES in one place, NO in another. If they don't add up to a dollar, you locked a profit. Before the event even happens. Here's how the arbitrage actually works and how to master it: This is the closest thing to free money on Polymarket. Every market has a YES and a NO. One of them MUST resolve to $1. The other goes to zero. So in theory, YES + NO should always cost exactly $1. But in thin or messy markets, they don't. Sometimes you can buy: > YES at 0.48 > NO at 0.49 > total cost: 0.97 This guy does it every day: [ He also uploaded a full guide on how to build the same bot. One side pays you $1 at resolution no matter what. He spends 97 cents to guarantee a dollar. That 3 cents is locked, risk-free. There's also the cross-market version. The same event sometimes has two separate markets at different prices. Buy the cheap YES in one, the cheap NO in the other, and pocket the gap. Sounds easy, right? But here's the honest part: These gaps close in about 2.7 seconds now. By the time you click by hand, a bot already took it. So the manual version only really survives in low-liquidity markets the bots ignore. The fast version? That lives in compiled code with a VPS sitting next to the exchange. If you can code, this is one of the cleanest edges i know. If you can't, stick to the thin markets where speed matters less. Good luck!

Dexter's Lab

11,583 次观看 • 18 天前

The likely resolution of the Mideast conflict and the relief in the oil market that has come with it most benefits economies outside the US, taking away a key risk to their outperformance ahead.
0:54

The likely resolution of the Mideast conflict and the relief in the oil market that has come with it most benefits economies outside the US, taking away a key risk to their outperformance ahead.

Bob Elliott

18,753 次观看 • 1 年前

Just voted YES on the War Powers Resolution to end Trump's unfettered ability to wage war in Iran. It failed by one vote. One. Vote. Last time, the margin was worse. We're gaining ground and we'll keep at it until Congress does its job and upholds the Constitution.
0:47

Just voted YES on the War Powers Resolution to end Trump's unfettered ability to wage war in Iran. It failed by one vote. One. Vote. Last time, the margin was worse. We're gaining ground and we'll keep at it until Congress does its job and upholds the Constitution.

Rep. Laura Friedman

12,444 次观看 • 2 个月前

Reporter: Does the U.S. running the country mean that U.S. troops will be on the ground? Trump: They always say ‘boots on the ground.’ We’re not afraid of boots on the ground if we have to have them. We had boots on the ground last night—at a very high level. We’re not afraid of it, and we don’t mind saying it. We’re not doing this in vain. This was a very dangerous operation. This was an attack that could have gone very, very badly.
0:41

Reporter: Does the U.S. running the country mean that U.S. troops will be on the ground? Trump: They always say ‘boots on the ground.’ We’re not afraid of boots on the ground if we have to have them. We had boots on the ground last night—at a very high level. We’re not afraid of it, and we don’t mind saying it. We’re not doing this in vain. This was a very dangerous operation. This was an attack that could have gone very, very badly.

Clash Report

47,066 次观看 • 6 个月前

Russia FM Lavrov dismantled the Bahrain UN resolution on the Strait of Hormuz The resolution authorizes "all interested states" to take "all necessary defensive measures" in the Strait. But who decides what's proportionate? The same states authorized to act. "We know how our Western colleagues handled supposedly defensive Security Council decisions -- they turned them upside down and used them for aggression." These measures would also operate on the territory of Gulf coastal states who have no say in them. "A direct violation of their sovereignty." Then he uses Trump's own words against it. Trump said days ago that once military operations end, Hormuz navigation resumes normally. Lavrov: "So the problem isn't making demands of Iran -- stop the military operations." China is telling Gulf partners the exact same thing. Stop the war, navigation returns. The resolution doesn't even acknowledge Iran was attacked first. Pushing it through "in the midst of what the United States itself calls negotiations" will antagonize Tehran. So either someone wants to blow up whatever diplomatic process exists -- or the talk of negotiations is cover for another attack, "as happened in June last year and February this year." In that case, this resolution is retroactive legitimization of aggression. On Article 51: the US attacked Iran and called it "preventive self-defense" even though Iran never attacked them. Now Gulf states invoke the same logic. But Article 51 doesn't require a Security Council resolution. Gulf states can already act under it. So why push for one? Because this was never about self-defense -- it's about legitimizing future aggression. Lavrov says he asked Gulf leaders directly on a video call: "Did Iran actually attack you?" No. But they told him Iran has wanted to attack its neighbors for 70 years, and now that the US and Israel struck first, Iran seized the opportunity. That's the argument being used to authorize military force through the UN Security Council
8:21

Russia FM Lavrov dismantled the Bahrain UN resolution on the Strait of Hormuz The resolution authorizes "all interested states" to take "all necessary defensive measures" in the Strait. But who decides what's proportionate? The same states authorized to act. "We know how our Western colleagues handled supposedly defensive Security Council decisions -- they turned them upside down and used them for aggression." These measures would also operate on the territory of Gulf coastal states who have no say in them. "A direct violation of their sovereignty." Then he uses Trump's own words against it. Trump said days ago that once military operations end, Hormuz navigation resumes normally. Lavrov: "So the problem isn't making demands of Iran -- stop the military operations." China is telling Gulf partners the exact same thing. Stop the war, navigation returns. The resolution doesn't even acknowledge Iran was attacked first. Pushing it through "in the midst of what the United States itself calls negotiations" will antagonize Tehran. So either someone wants to blow up whatever diplomatic process exists -- or the talk of negotiations is cover for another attack, "as happened in June last year and February this year." In that case, this resolution is retroactive legitimization of aggression. On Article 51: the US attacked Iran and called it "preventive self-defense" even though Iran never attacked them. Now Gulf states invoke the same logic. But Article 51 doesn't require a Security Council resolution. Gulf states can already act under it. So why push for one? Because this was never about self-defense -- it's about legitimizing future aggression. Lavrov says he asked Gulf leaders directly on a video call: "Did Iran actually attack you?" No. But they told him Iran has wanted to attack its neighbors for 70 years, and now that the US and Israel struck first, Iran seized the opportunity. That's the argument being used to authorize military force through the UN Security Council

COMBATE |🇵🇷

45,465 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bridgit Mendler on how Northwood is fixing the space economy's ground infrastructure problem: "The problem that we're solving is for every satellite, it requires a connection point back to Earth so that they can control the spacecraft." "That point of contact on Earth is called the ground infrastructure." "If you don't have it, you don't have a space mission." "It literally is just like a rock in space you're doing nothing with." "There was this whole boom around spacecraft manufacturing." "And interestingly what started becoming the longest pole in the tent was just getting the point of contact on the ground to connect with." "You could build a satellite and launch it faster than you could actually connect with it from the ground." "Which just seemed absurd." Bridgit Mendler with Erik Torenberg
1:42

Bridgit Mendler on how Northwood is fixing the space economy's ground infrastructure problem: "The problem that we're solving is for every satellite, it requires a connection point back to Earth so that they can control the spacecraft." "That point of contact on Earth is called the ground infrastructure." "If you don't have it, you don't have a space mission." "It literally is just like a rock in space you're doing nothing with." "There was this whole boom around spacecraft manufacturing." "And interestingly what started becoming the longest pole in the tent was just getting the point of contact on the ground to connect with." "You could build a satellite and launch it faster than you could actually connect with it from the ground." "Which just seemed absurd." Bridgit Mendler with Erik Torenberg

a16z

13,324 次观看 • 3 个月前

Apparently, people believe this vote never happened, the resolution doesn't exist, and that it never passed. Here you go: "The resolution is adopted." "Senator Rick Scott on the Senate floor called for the passage of his resolution honoring the legacy of Charlie Kirk by designating October 14, 2025 as a National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk, which passed by unanimous consent."
0:50

Apparently, people believe this vote never happened, the resolution doesn't exist, and that it never passed. Here you go: "The resolution is adopted." "Senator Rick Scott on the Senate floor called for the passage of his resolution honoring the legacy of Charlie Kirk by designating October 14, 2025 as a National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk, which passed by unanimous consent."

Eric Daugherty

188,472 次观看 • 9 个月前

☝️ “The most blatant and striking actions the U.S. has taken in recent years, allegedly in defense of its interests, thousands of miles from its own borders, have been carried out without any authorization from the UN Security Council. Under what pretext did they bomb Yugoslavia? Was there a Security Council resolution? Where is Yugoslavia, and where is the United States? Who gave them the right to destroy a European capital? No one. They simply decided to do it, and they did. That, for them, is international law. And under what pretext did they invade Iraq? The alleged development of weapons of mass destruction. They invaded, destroyed the country, and turned it into a breeding ground for international terrorism. Then it turned out they were wrong. They said their intelligence had let them down. Really? You destroy an entire country and blame it on an intelligence failure? And how did they get into Syria? A Security Council resolution? No. They do whatever they want” - President Putin
1:51

☝️ “The most blatant and striking actions the U.S. has taken in recent years, allegedly in defense of its interests, thousands of miles from its own borders, have been carried out without any authorization from the UN Security Council. Under what pretext did they bomb Yugoslavia? Was there a Security Council resolution? Where is Yugoslavia, and where is the United States? Who gave them the right to destroy a European capital? No one. They simply decided to do it, and they did. That, for them, is international law. And under what pretext did they invade Iraq? The alleged development of weapons of mass destruction. They invaded, destroyed the country, and turned it into a breeding ground for international terrorism. Then it turned out they were wrong. They said their intelligence had let them down. Really? You destroy an entire country and blame it on an intelligence failure? And how did they get into Syria? A Security Council resolution? No. They do whatever they want” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

59,481 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨Let me explain what actually happened yesterday at the UNGA. It may sound technical, but for the UN it was a real revolution — and another example that Ukraine is fighting on every front and keeps winning, with true allies aren’t backing away. Every three years, RU — through Belarus — has pushed a resolution on “minimizing the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster,” avoiding any mention of UA and insisting on using the RU spelling Chernobyl instead of the correct Ukrainian Chornobyl. They also refused to acknowledge responsibility for the original disaster or for their current attacks on nuclear sites. For years, the UNGA passed this so-called “consensus resolution,” and even some of UA’s allies accepted it. But the UA delegation said no. They introduced their own resolution first, blocked every amendment from RU and Belarus, secured the vote, and then — thanks to Khrystyna Hayovyshyn — successfully moved to not even consider the Belarusian proposal since the UA one had already passed. Major kudos to UKR Mission to the UN and Andrii Melnyk
1:27

🚨Let me explain what actually happened yesterday at the UNGA. It may sound technical, but for the UN it was a real revolution — and another example that Ukraine is fighting on every front and keeps winning, with true allies aren’t backing away. Every three years, RU — through Belarus — has pushed a resolution on “minimizing the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster,” avoiding any mention of UA and insisting on using the RU spelling Chernobyl instead of the correct Ukrainian Chornobyl. They also refused to acknowledge responsibility for the original disaster or for their current attacks on nuclear sites. For years, the UNGA passed this so-called “consensus resolution,” and even some of UA’s allies accepted it. But the UA delegation said no. They introduced their own resolution first, blocked every amendment from RU and Belarus, secured the vote, and then — thanks to Khrystyna Hayovyshyn — successfully moved to not even consider the Belarusian proposal since the UA one had already passed. Major kudos to UKR Mission to the UN and Andrii Melnyk

Kateryna Lisunova

56,322 次观看 • 6 个月前

The Russian Security Council has been briefed that the US plans to execute a boots on the ground attack on Iran this week. If I know this, the Iranians know it, they will be ready, and it's not going to be pretty. The US government really doesn't give a shit about US soldiers...
1:33

The Russian Security Council has been briefed that the US plans to execute a boots on the ground attack on Iran this week. If I know this, the Iranians know it, they will be ready, and it's not going to be pretty. The US government really doesn't give a shit about US soldiers...

Kerry Burgess

42,536 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein
2:47

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

13,901 次观看 • 6 个月前

BREAKING: The UN Security Council has passed a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza during Ramadan. The resolution calls for the release of all hostages on all sides. Russia attempted to put the word "permanent" into the text but the US voted against it.
0:59

BREAKING: The UN Security Council has passed a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza during Ramadan. The resolution calls for the release of all hostages on all sides. Russia attempted to put the word "permanent" into the text but the US voted against it.

BreakThrough News

859,621 次观看 • 2 年前

“The most likely resolution is in the summer…when Giannis has a clear yes or no with the extension they put in front of him this offseason. But I'm not closing the door on an in-season trade. Especially if the Bucks continue to make up no ground in the standings.” Zach Lowe
1:06

“The most likely resolution is in the summer…when Giannis has a clear yes or no with the extension they put in front of him this offseason. But I'm not closing the door on an in-season trade. Especially if the Bucks continue to make up no ground in the standings.” Zach Lowe

Dru

11,042 次观看 • 6 个月前

"It seems pretty clear that the US is putting a concerted push behind these efforts to reach a resolution to the conflict." Sky's Ivor Bennett says the US is confident of reaching a middle ground between Russia and Ukraine ahead of talks in Abu Dhabi.
3:02

"It seems pretty clear that the US is putting a concerted push behind these efforts to reach a resolution to the conflict." Sky's Ivor Bennett says the US is confident of reaching a middle ground between Russia and Ukraine ahead of talks in Abu Dhabi.

Sky News

15,269 次观看 • 7 个月前

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate Sanjay Hegde said on Places of Worship Act, 1991. "With the Ram Temple movement, the structure at Ayodhya came into question. At that point of time, before December 6, 1992 happened, Parliament said, 'look, these questions can keep coming but as a country, we take a call and whatever was the status of any religious structure as on the day of our Independence - August 15, 1947, it will be preserved as it is. Whatever be the character, it will not be changed. The only exception made was for the Ayodhya dispute which was then already pending in the courts. This was passed by Parliament, and it continues to be the law even today, it has not been repealed by Parliament." #AjmerSharif #PlacesOfWorshipAct (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:05

VIDEO | Here's what senior advocate Sanjay Hegde said on Places of Worship Act, 1991. "With the Ram Temple movement, the structure at Ayodhya came into question. At that point of time, before December 6, 1992 happened, Parliament said, 'look, these questions can keep coming but as a country, we take a call and whatever was the status of any religious structure as on the day of our Independence - August 15, 1947, it will be preserved as it is. Whatever be the character, it will not be changed. The only exception made was for the Ayodhya dispute which was then already pending in the courts. This was passed by Parliament, and it continues to be the law even today, it has not been repealed by Parliament." #AjmerSharif #PlacesOfWorshipAct (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

31,905 次观看 • 1 年前

Vance on Iran: Part of what we're trying to do in this negotiation is to see how serious they actually are… If it doesn't lead to a successful resolution on the diplomatic side…. we've still accomplished a whole lot for the American people.
0:59

Vance on Iran: Part of what we're trying to do in this negotiation is to see how serious they actually are… If it doesn't lead to a successful resolution on the diplomatic side…. we've still accomplished a whole lot for the American people.

Acyn

44,965 次观看 • 3 天前