Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Pop up slaughterhouses erected on public streets without permits. Multiple health code violations. Risk of infectious disease transmission. Despite these #PublicHealth risks and #avianflu outbreaks impacting mammals, Dr. Alister Martin is allowing #kaporos in NYC, prioritizing politics ahead of public health. cc: Sheryl Gay Stolberg New York Times Opinion

Animal Rights News

22,495 subscribers

54,248 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес #PublicHealth #avianflu #kaporos

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Jessica Miracola

Jessica Miracola3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal I live in Crown Heights and dread this time of year. I happened to be on Eastern Parkway last night and took photos of the cowardly barbaric murder-tents. A jewish man asked me why I did so and we had a very long discussion. Tldr, they think the chickens WANT to die for them 🤦🏼‍♀️

Фото профиля Megg Gawat 🌱

Megg Gawat 🌱3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal This is pretty horrific

Фото профиля Paul Kiernan

Paul Kiernan3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal What do we do to stop this?

Фото профиля Celestite

Celestite3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal This is horrific cruelty 🥺😡

Фото профиля Christine Wilson

Christine Wilson3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal Omg, this is horrific, so heartbreaking, and so very wrong, those poor poor chickens. 🤬🤬💔💔😢😢

Фото профиля Linda Hamlyn

Linda Hamlyn3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal The Top Three Religions accept the 5 Books of Moses, So they should live by them In Genesis, Moses tells of the Garden of Eden, a perfect paradise, a vegan world Where animals were treated as equals If these Three truly believe in God Why are they not preaching veganism?

Фото профиля Blinders

Blinders3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal Why does @NYCMayor Eric Adams aid and abet in #Kaporos crimes by instructing #NYPD precincts in ultra-Orthodox neighborhoods to provide floodlights, barricades, security and other resources? The voting bloc. And when a deadly #avianflu outbreak occurs, he will blame @nycHealthy

Фото профиля Bobo Smith

Bobo Smith3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal NO ANIMAL should EVER be treated like this🤬! My understanding is that there are over 30+ like this in the NYC area....THIS NEEDS TO STOP... NOW🛑

Фото профиля Lindsey Falconer

Lindsey Falconer3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal This is horrifying, in every respect.

Фото профиля 🖋️Andrew Fox Ⓥ

🖋️Andrew Fox Ⓥ3 лет назад

@NYCHealthCommr @nyagandmarkets @jessemckinley @NYCHealthCMO @DrBraden_NCEZID @DelthiaRicks @USDAFoodSafety @HealthNYGov @BethMaldin @DrTomFrieden @brianmrosenthal Humans are disgusting.

Похожие видео

#Mpox outbreaks are caused by different strains of viruses called clades. The current outbreak in the Eastern #DRC is caused by a new offshoot of clade 1, called clade 1b, which causes more severe disease than clade 2. Clade 1b has been confirmed in Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda. Stopping transmission will require a comprehensive response, with communities at the centre. The Emergency Committee under the International Health Regulations will meet soon to advise me on whether the outbreak represents a public health emergency of international concern.

#Mpox outbreaks are caused by different strains of viruses called clades. The current outbreak in the Eastern #DRC is caused by a new offshoot of clade 1, called clade 1b, which causes more severe disease than clade 2. Clade 1b has been confirmed in Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda. Stopping transmission will require a comprehensive response, with communities at the centre. The Emergency Committee under the International Health Regulations will meet soon to advise me on whether the outbreak represents a public health emergency of international concern.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus

193,927 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"Just one case is sufficient to trigger transmission in any given area, and that’s why it’s important we're able to support the countries that are affected to put in place effective surveillance systems that will rapidly identify any new cases, effectively follow up on the contacts, and be able to contain the transmission," WHO African Region's Dr Patrick Otim on Al Jazeera English after #mpox was declared a public health emergency of international concern.

"Just one case is sufficient to trigger transmission in any given area, and that’s why it’s important we're able to support the countries that are affected to put in place effective surveillance systems that will rapidly identify any new cases, effectively follow up on the contacts, and be able to contain the transmission," WHO African Region's Dr Patrick Otim on Al Jazeera English after #mpox was declared a public health emergency of international concern.

WHO African Region

24,762 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Public Health Agency of Canada releases first report on psychological manipulation of citizens🩺🇨🇦 Under Chief Medical Officer Theresa Tam, the Public Health Agency of Canada has launched a behavioural science office and released a report on persuasion tactics for compliance, raising ethical concerns about transparency in how taxpayer money is used to influence public behaviour. Canada’s public health agency (Health Canada and PHAC) has established a behavioural science office (BeSciO) and has recently released its first report detailing its persuasion of public compliance under the guidance of Chief Medical Officer of Canada, Theresa Tam (Canada's CPHO). Tam, who also serves on various World Health Organization committees, has been heavily scrutinized for this conflict of interest in recent years. The report starts with a land acknowledgment and outlines the Public Health Agency of Canada’s progress in establishing BeSciO from April 2021 to March 2023. Launched in Spring 2021, BeSciO emphasizes the importance of human behaviour in public health and supported the government's pandemic response with critical advice and evidence. The report defines behavioural science (BeSci) as a multidisciplinary field that studies human behaviour and decision-making by integrating psychology, neuroscience, and social sciences. It emphasizes the importance of understanding psychological, sociocultural, and systemic factors that influence decision-making, enabling practitioners to create effective solutions that impact behaviour-based outcomes. It’s noted in the report that BeSciO has “joined forces with the Office of the Chief Public Health Officer, the World Health Organization, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Behavioural Insights Team, to name only a few.” As such, it’s important for the public to be prepared for the “crazy ideas” coming down the pike, as stated by WHO director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus (Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus) during a strategic roundtable on behavioural science for better health in 2022. Tam confirms collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), utilizing their behavioural insights tool to monitor compliance with public health measures. The new unit says it is “indebted to the incredible staff of BeSciO, as well as PHAC’s Data, Surveillance and Foresight Branch (formerly Corporate Data and Surveillance Branch).” The report is signed by Heather Devine (Heather Devine 🇨🇦) and Dhurata Ikonomi (Dhurata Ikonomi 🇨🇦), but the rest of the behavioural science team remains unclear. Notably, while partner Impact Canada lists its behavioural insight team, neither Devine nor Ikonomi are included, suggesting the government employs behavioural scientists in various, less transparent roles beyond public health. BeSciO was formed after a “needs assessment” was conducted in April 2021, and then Minister of Health Patty Hajdu, who is said to have “recognized the critical role of human behaviour in public health.” “Creating BeSciO introduced an innovation and experimentation function within the Branch to support PHAC's revitalization as a world-leading, data-driven public health organization,” it says. It would appear that one of their first tasks was the May 2021 memo titled “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization” where messaging and communication around COVID-19 vaccine injuries needed to be framed in a way that did not compromise the government's safe and effective marketing slogan. Faced with mounting distrust in public health after its grotesque failures in pandemic handling and response, in its first year, BeSciO aimed to address “priority areas such as vaccine confidence, public health measures, combatting mis/disinformation, borders measures, and public health communications to inform key pandemic response activities. In its second year, BeSciO expanded its focus to new areas that emerged as critical to PHAC’s mandate, including climate change and infectious disease, mental health, and antimicrobial resistance.” The new office highlights the growing global use of behavioural science to improve health outcomes by addressing human decision-making tendencies. It aims to predict responses to policies, identify barriers to health-promoting behaviours, design aligned programs, and evaluate interventions for better outcomes. In its first two years, it completed 11 research projects, responded to over 50 advice requests, recruited 10 fellows, conducted 10 training sessions, expanded its community of practice by 308 members, and published 63 newsletters on topics including COVID-19, public trust, mental health, and climate change. It further outlines how it came after the WHO developed the behavioural insights tool – the organization that says “One of the most critical elements of reducing virus transmission is public behaviour.” BeSciO plans to use its research to gauge Canadians' intentions regarding public health measures, studying misinformation and public trust in PHAC. Future project areas include antimicrobial stewardship, childhood immunizations, mask-wearing, mental health, and climate change. They will apply the IMPActS model to shape perceptions and behaviours, which involves identifying policy challenges, mapping targeted changes, prototyping solutions, testing effectiveness, and scaling successful strategies. Notably, their efforts include supporting routine childhood immunization programs during the pandemic through collaboration with the Vaccine Behaviour and Confidence Team of PHAC. The use of behavioural science to nudge compliance often amounts to coercion, occurring subliminally without the public's awareness, undermining personal autonomy and trust. It raises ethical concerns about experimenting on individuals without consent and emphasizes the need for transparency from the agency about these techniques and their impact on public behaviour, particularly given the millions in taxpayer funding involved. By Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦 |

Public Health Agency of Canada releases first report on psychological manipulation of citizens🩺🇨🇦 Under Chief Medical Officer Theresa Tam, the Public Health Agency of Canada has launched a behavioural science office and released a report on persuasion tactics for compliance, raising ethical concerns about transparency in how taxpayer money is used to influence public behaviour. Canada’s public health agency (Health Canada and PHAC) has established a behavioural science office (BeSciO) and has recently released its first report detailing its persuasion of public compliance under the guidance of Chief Medical Officer of Canada, Theresa Tam (Canada's CPHO). Tam, who also serves on various World Health Organization committees, has been heavily scrutinized for this conflict of interest in recent years. The report starts with a land acknowledgment and outlines the Public Health Agency of Canada’s progress in establishing BeSciO from April 2021 to March 2023. Launched in Spring 2021, BeSciO emphasizes the importance of human behaviour in public health and supported the government's pandemic response with critical advice and evidence. The report defines behavioural science (BeSci) as a multidisciplinary field that studies human behaviour and decision-making by integrating psychology, neuroscience, and social sciences. It emphasizes the importance of understanding psychological, sociocultural, and systemic factors that influence decision-making, enabling practitioners to create effective solutions that impact behaviour-based outcomes. It’s noted in the report that BeSciO has “joined forces with the Office of the Chief Public Health Officer, the World Health Organization, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Behavioural Insights Team, to name only a few.” As such, it’s important for the public to be prepared for the “crazy ideas” coming down the pike, as stated by WHO director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus (Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus) during a strategic roundtable on behavioural science for better health in 2022. Tam confirms collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), utilizing their behavioural insights tool to monitor compliance with public health measures. The new unit says it is “indebted to the incredible staff of BeSciO, as well as PHAC’s Data, Surveillance and Foresight Branch (formerly Corporate Data and Surveillance Branch).” The report is signed by Heather Devine (Heather Devine 🇨🇦) and Dhurata Ikonomi (Dhurata Ikonomi 🇨🇦), but the rest of the behavioural science team remains unclear. Notably, while partner Impact Canada lists its behavioural insight team, neither Devine nor Ikonomi are included, suggesting the government employs behavioural scientists in various, less transparent roles beyond public health. BeSciO was formed after a “needs assessment” was conducted in April 2021, and then Minister of Health Patty Hajdu, who is said to have “recognized the critical role of human behaviour in public health.” “Creating BeSciO introduced an innovation and experimentation function within the Branch to support PHAC's revitalization as a world-leading, data-driven public health organization,” it says. It would appear that one of their first tasks was the May 2021 memo titled “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization” where messaging and communication around COVID-19 vaccine injuries needed to be framed in a way that did not compromise the government's safe and effective marketing slogan. Faced with mounting distrust in public health after its grotesque failures in pandemic handling and response, in its first year, BeSciO aimed to address “priority areas such as vaccine confidence, public health measures, combatting mis/disinformation, borders measures, and public health communications to inform key pandemic response activities. In its second year, BeSciO expanded its focus to new areas that emerged as critical to PHAC’s mandate, including climate change and infectious disease, mental health, and antimicrobial resistance.” The new office highlights the growing global use of behavioural science to improve health outcomes by addressing human decision-making tendencies. It aims to predict responses to policies, identify barriers to health-promoting behaviours, design aligned programs, and evaluate interventions for better outcomes. In its first two years, it completed 11 research projects, responded to over 50 advice requests, recruited 10 fellows, conducted 10 training sessions, expanded its community of practice by 308 members, and published 63 newsletters on topics including COVID-19, public trust, mental health, and climate change. It further outlines how it came after the WHO developed the behavioural insights tool – the organization that says “One of the most critical elements of reducing virus transmission is public behaviour.” BeSciO plans to use its research to gauge Canadians' intentions regarding public health measures, studying misinformation and public trust in PHAC. Future project areas include antimicrobial stewardship, childhood immunizations, mask-wearing, mental health, and climate change. They will apply the IMPActS model to shape perceptions and behaviours, which involves identifying policy challenges, mapping targeted changes, prototyping solutions, testing effectiveness, and scaling successful strategies. Notably, their efforts include supporting routine childhood immunization programs during the pandemic through collaboration with the Vaccine Behaviour and Confidence Team of PHAC. The use of behavioural science to nudge compliance often amounts to coercion, occurring subliminally without the public's awareness, undermining personal autonomy and trust. It raises ethical concerns about experimenting on individuals without consent and emphasizes the need for transparency from the agency about these techniques and their impact on public behaviour, particularly given the millions in taxpayer funding involved. By Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦 |

Rebel News

82,091 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Peter Robinson (Peter Robinson) speaks with Jay Bhattacharya, a former Stanford professor and epidemiologist, and the newly appointed director of the National Institutes of Health. Once labeled a "fringe epidemiologist" by the previous administration at NIH, he now leads the world's largest biomedical research agency and its $50 billion annual budget. Their conversation explores the structural flaws in America's public health institutions, including the replication crisis, the culture of scientific risk aversion, and the NIH's growing failure to address the rise of chronic disease. Dr. Bhattacharya outlines his vision for reform—emphasizing transparency, innovation, and restoring public trust in science. He also addresses the politics of scientific funding, the need for better vaccine evaluation standards, and the rationale behind the administration's new restrictions on gain-of-function research. It is a candid and thoughtful discussion with a scientist now tasked with reshaping the very system that once attacked him. Watch the full episode of Uncommon Knowledge on X:

Peter Robinson (Peter Robinson) speaks with Jay Bhattacharya, a former Stanford professor and epidemiologist, and the newly appointed director of the National Institutes of Health. Once labeled a "fringe epidemiologist" by the previous administration at NIH, he now leads the world's largest biomedical research agency and its $50 billion annual budget. Their conversation explores the structural flaws in America's public health institutions, including the replication crisis, the culture of scientific risk aversion, and the NIH's growing failure to address the rise of chronic disease. Dr. Bhattacharya outlines his vision for reform—emphasizing transparency, innovation, and restoring public trust in science. He also addresses the politics of scientific funding, the need for better vaccine evaluation standards, and the rationale behind the administration's new restrictions on gain-of-function research. It is a candid and thoughtful discussion with a scientist now tasked with reshaping the very system that once attacked him. Watch the full episode of Uncommon Knowledge on X:

Hoover Institution

19,696 просмотров • 1 год назад

Residents around Ikotun Market and Ejigbo Road have stated they are left with no options than to dump refuse on the streets. They complain bitterly over inadequate waste collection by the government, the visible absence of waste collection trucks and the overall blatant incompetence of the Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA) operations in many areas. This persistent refuse heaps on the streets are not just an eyesore; they are a serious public health problem which can lead to disease outbreaks, environmental damage and destruction of lives and livelihood if nothing is done as a matter of urgency in these areas of Lagos state. This is the Lagos they claim that Tinubu built, yet it is a colossal nightmare, a disgusting eyesore and an exceptional failure in basic waste management.

Residents around Ikotun Market and Ejigbo Road have stated they are left with no options than to dump refuse on the streets. They complain bitterly over inadequate waste collection by the government, the visible absence of waste collection trucks and the overall blatant incompetence of the Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA) operations in many areas. This persistent refuse heaps on the streets are not just an eyesore; they are a serious public health problem which can lead to disease outbreaks, environmental damage and destruction of lives and livelihood if nothing is done as a matter of urgency in these areas of Lagos state. This is the Lagos they claim that Tinubu built, yet it is a colossal nightmare, a disgusting eyesore and an exceptional failure in basic waste management.

OurFaveOnlineDoc 🇬🇧 🇳🇬

26,511 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Theresa Tam emails reveal unethical medical experiments on Inuit babies Informed consent ignored as Theresa Tam's team subjects vulnerable children to failed drug trials, without oversight or accountability. Recently uncovered government emails reveal that the Public Health Agency of Canada (Health Canada and PHAC), led by Dr. Theresa Tam, subjected Inuit babies to experimental drug trials without their, or their parents' consent. The email correspondence, part of a massive 450,000-page disclosure made possible by Bret Sears, exposes a failed pharmaceutical program that ignored ethical standards, raising serious questions about accountability within Canada's public health system. The experimental drug in question, an RSV monoclonal antibody program, was administered to Inuit infants in Nunavik, an Inuit territory in Quebec, without proper consent or transparency. Despite concerns raised by healthcare workers about the lack of informed consent and the absence of Inuit community involvement in the decision-making process, the program proceeded. The drug, developed by AstraZeneca, was intended to treat respiratory infections, but internal PHAC emails reveal that the trial was unsuccessful. Not only did it fail to prevent hospitalizations from RSV, but the data from the trial also indicated negative effectiveness. An email dated December 16, 2019, uncovered by retired police detective and independent investigator Donald Best, reveals that Dr. Tom Wong, the Director General of Population & Public Health at Indigenous Services Canada, admitted the trial’s disappointing outcomes, noting that the program had "little chance" of preventing RSV-related hospitalizations, even at regional and tertiary hospitals. Worse yet, Wong knew that the experiment had significant ethical concerns among healthcare professionals, with no guarantees of free and informed consent. The exposure of this trial reveals a disturbing pattern of unethical medical experimentation on Indigenous children in Canada. As further detailed by Best, non-consenting Indigenous children have historically been subjected to medical trials dating back to the 1930s, including harmful tuberculosis vaccine experiments that documented fatalities, and deliberate starvation under the guise of studying malnutrition in the 40s and 50s. Best has been scrutinizing the released documents and questions whether the actions of Dr. Tam and other public health officials could lead to criminal negligence charges. If it is proven that they were aware of the risks and continued the program without informed consent, he says this could constitute criminal wrongdoing. Despite the government's recognition of the ethical concerns surrounding the experiment, there has been no accountability for its flawed execution. Even more disturbingly, the failed drug trial did not deter the public health agency from continuing to recommend the same treatment, which they call “expensive.” The blatant disregard for informed consent and the exploitation of vulnerable Indigenous communities for the benefit of Big Pharma is shocking, with public health officials knowingly proceeding with these experiments and putting innocent babies at risk, all without their knowledge or consent. Rebel News presented these serious accusations to Canada’s health agency, but they failed to respond for comment. This breach of ethics and transparency raises critical questions about the integrity of Canada's health authorities. The implications of this report extend beyond the health of Indigenous children—it challenges the very foundations of public health in Canada. How far do these unethical practices extend, and who will ultimately be held accountable for the harm caused? By Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦

Theresa Tam emails reveal unethical medical experiments on Inuit babies Informed consent ignored as Theresa Tam's team subjects vulnerable children to failed drug trials, without oversight or accountability. Recently uncovered government emails reveal that the Public Health Agency of Canada (Health Canada and PHAC), led by Dr. Theresa Tam, subjected Inuit babies to experimental drug trials without their, or their parents' consent. The email correspondence, part of a massive 450,000-page disclosure made possible by Bret Sears, exposes a failed pharmaceutical program that ignored ethical standards, raising serious questions about accountability within Canada's public health system. The experimental drug in question, an RSV monoclonal antibody program, was administered to Inuit infants in Nunavik, an Inuit territory in Quebec, without proper consent or transparency. Despite concerns raised by healthcare workers about the lack of informed consent and the absence of Inuit community involvement in the decision-making process, the program proceeded. The drug, developed by AstraZeneca, was intended to treat respiratory infections, but internal PHAC emails reveal that the trial was unsuccessful. Not only did it fail to prevent hospitalizations from RSV, but the data from the trial also indicated negative effectiveness. An email dated December 16, 2019, uncovered by retired police detective and independent investigator Donald Best, reveals that Dr. Tom Wong, the Director General of Population & Public Health at Indigenous Services Canada, admitted the trial’s disappointing outcomes, noting that the program had "little chance" of preventing RSV-related hospitalizations, even at regional and tertiary hospitals. Worse yet, Wong knew that the experiment had significant ethical concerns among healthcare professionals, with no guarantees of free and informed consent. The exposure of this trial reveals a disturbing pattern of unethical medical experimentation on Indigenous children in Canada. As further detailed by Best, non-consenting Indigenous children have historically been subjected to medical trials dating back to the 1930s, including harmful tuberculosis vaccine experiments that documented fatalities, and deliberate starvation under the guise of studying malnutrition in the 40s and 50s. Best has been scrutinizing the released documents and questions whether the actions of Dr. Tam and other public health officials could lead to criminal negligence charges. If it is proven that they were aware of the risks and continued the program without informed consent, he says this could constitute criminal wrongdoing. Despite the government's recognition of the ethical concerns surrounding the experiment, there has been no accountability for its flawed execution. Even more disturbingly, the failed drug trial did not deter the public health agency from continuing to recommend the same treatment, which they call “expensive.” The blatant disregard for informed consent and the exploitation of vulnerable Indigenous communities for the benefit of Big Pharma is shocking, with public health officials knowingly proceeding with these experiments and putting innocent babies at risk, all without their knowledge or consent. Rebel News presented these serious accusations to Canada’s health agency, but they failed to respond for comment. This breach of ethics and transparency raises critical questions about the integrity of Canada's health authorities. The implications of this report extend beyond the health of Indigenous children—it challenges the very foundations of public health in Canada. How far do these unethical practices extend, and who will ultimately be held accountable for the harm caused? By Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦

Rebel News

78,805 просмотров • 1 год назад

Today, at Redeemer’s University Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, I was glad to commission the new Institute of Genomics and Global Health, marking a significant evolution from ACEGID’s @acegid status as a center of excellence. This moment is not only a proud achievement for all those involved, but it also stands as a powerful symbol of what African scientific leadership can achieve on the global stage. Under the visionary leadership of Prof Christian Happi Christian T. Happi, the team at ACEGID has made extraordinary strides in genomic research, particularly in addressing some of the most pressing infectious disease challenges of our time. The inauguration of the Institute reminds us that the work being done by the ACEGID team is a global public good, benefiting not only Nigeria and Africa but also contributing to global health security. The partnerships fostered between institutions and scientists from the Global North and South are a testament to our shared commitment to protecting and advancing human health. This collaboration has demonstrated what is possible when we work together to confront challenges that affect us all. Under the visionary leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Bola Ahmed Tinubu health security remains a central pillar of our broader strategy to transform Nigeria’s health system, unlock the value chain, and improve population health outcomes. This is why supporting cutting-edge scientific research, like the work at this Institute, is essential. We need to create a health system environment with strong public health capabilities to withstand the potential and evolving threats posed by infectious diseases and the ongoing impacts of climate change. The pace at which new health threats are emerging is accelerating, and with it, the need for robust scientific responses. The innovations in genomics we are witnessing at ACEGID provide a glimmer of hope, offering us the tools we need to be better prepared for what may come. The Federal Government of Nigeria Government of Nigeria is fully committed to supporting these efforts, knowing that science must lead the way in securing a healthier future for all.

Today, at Redeemer’s University Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, I was glad to commission the new Institute of Genomics and Global Health, marking a significant evolution from ACEGID’s @acegid status as a center of excellence. This moment is not only a proud achievement for all those involved, but it also stands as a powerful symbol of what African scientific leadership can achieve on the global stage. Under the visionary leadership of Prof Christian Happi Christian T. Happi, the team at ACEGID has made extraordinary strides in genomic research, particularly in addressing some of the most pressing infectious disease challenges of our time. The inauguration of the Institute reminds us that the work being done by the ACEGID team is a global public good, benefiting not only Nigeria and Africa but also contributing to global health security. The partnerships fostered between institutions and scientists from the Global North and South are a testament to our shared commitment to protecting and advancing human health. This collaboration has demonstrated what is possible when we work together to confront challenges that affect us all. Under the visionary leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Bola Ahmed Tinubu health security remains a central pillar of our broader strategy to transform Nigeria’s health system, unlock the value chain, and improve population health outcomes. This is why supporting cutting-edge scientific research, like the work at this Institute, is essential. We need to create a health system environment with strong public health capabilities to withstand the potential and evolving threats posed by infectious diseases and the ongoing impacts of climate change. The pace at which new health threats are emerging is accelerating, and with it, the need for robust scientific responses. The innovations in genomics we are witnessing at ACEGID provide a glimmer of hope, offering us the tools we need to be better prepared for what may come. The Federal Government of Nigeria Government of Nigeria is fully committed to supporting these efforts, knowing that science must lead the way in securing a healthier future for all.

Muhammad Ali Pate

11,059 просмотров • 2 лет назад

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Challenges the Core Narrative on Vaccines and Public Health A chart showing the decline of infectious diseases is routinely used to claim vaccines saved hundreds of millions of lives. But what if that narrative is a scientific oversimplification promoted for profit and power? Secretary Kennedy points to a comprehensive CDC-funded study from the year 2000, conducted by CDC and Johns Hopkins researchers. Their analysis of 100 years of data concluded that nearly all the decline in infectious disease mortality happened before vaccines were introduced. The historical data reveals a clear story: - Measles: Deaths fell from ~13,000 annually to just a few hundred by 1960. The vaccine was introduced in 1963. - Pertussis & Influenza: The most dramatic mortality drops preceded widespread vaccination campaigns. - Tuberculosis & Scarlet Fever: These deaths disappeared along the same timeline, without any mass vaccination programs. So what caused the true public health revolution? Landmark studies attribute the decline not to medical interventions, but to better nutrition, superior sanitation, water chlorination, and refrigeration. These agricultural and engineering advances are credited with over 96% of the mortality reduction. The late Harvard Professor Edward Kass, a foundational figure in infectious diseases, warned in 1970 that the medical industry would attempt to claim credit for this decline to advance "profits, prestige, and influence." Vaccines can prevent infections, but an exclusive focus on the syringe has led to the neglect of therapeutics, nutrition, and lifestyle factors that build innate immunity. This distorted priority, evident in recent pandemic policy, had a steep human cost. The new direction at HHS under this administration is committed to: - A safer, modernized childhood vaccine schedule. - Gold-standard, transparent science for all medical products. - Addressing vaccine injuries and removing conflicts of interest. - Restoring scientific and medical freedom. It is time for a public health conversation grounded in full evidence, not entrenched dogma.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Challenges the Core Narrative on Vaccines and Public Health A chart showing the decline of infectious diseases is routinely used to claim vaccines saved hundreds of millions of lives. But what if that narrative is a scientific oversimplification promoted for profit and power? Secretary Kennedy points to a comprehensive CDC-funded study from the year 2000, conducted by CDC and Johns Hopkins researchers. Their analysis of 100 years of data concluded that nearly all the decline in infectious disease mortality happened before vaccines were introduced. The historical data reveals a clear story: - Measles: Deaths fell from ~13,000 annually to just a few hundred by 1960. The vaccine was introduced in 1963. - Pertussis & Influenza: The most dramatic mortality drops preceded widespread vaccination campaigns. - Tuberculosis & Scarlet Fever: These deaths disappeared along the same timeline, without any mass vaccination programs. So what caused the true public health revolution? Landmark studies attribute the decline not to medical interventions, but to better nutrition, superior sanitation, water chlorination, and refrigeration. These agricultural and engineering advances are credited with over 96% of the mortality reduction. The late Harvard Professor Edward Kass, a foundational figure in infectious diseases, warned in 1970 that the medical industry would attempt to claim credit for this decline to advance "profits, prestige, and influence." Vaccines can prevent infections, but an exclusive focus on the syringe has led to the neglect of therapeutics, nutrition, and lifestyle factors that build innate immunity. This distorted priority, evident in recent pandemic policy, had a steep human cost. The new direction at HHS under this administration is committed to: - A safer, modernized childhood vaccine schedule. - Gold-standard, transparent science for all medical products. - Addressing vaccine injuries and removing conflicts of interest. - Restoring scientific and medical freedom. It is time for a public health conversation grounded in full evidence, not entrenched dogma.

Camus

23,079 просмотров • 1 год назад

Important research into Lyme disease is taking place in Maine that could lead to the first vaccine for humans. To make certain that this research can reach its conclusion, I asked Dr. Susan Monarez, the nominee for CDC Director, if she would commit to allowing the ongoing clinical trial at MaineHealth Institute for Research to proceed without interruption. Maine recorded a record 3,035 cases of Lyme disease last year. This research is important, and a vaccine would mark a significant win in the fight against tick-borne diseases. As Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a member of the HELP Committee, I will continue to advocate for strong federal support for research into these growing public health threats.

Important research into Lyme disease is taking place in Maine that could lead to the first vaccine for humans. To make certain that this research can reach its conclusion, I asked Dr. Susan Monarez, the nominee for CDC Director, if she would commit to allowing the ongoing clinical trial at MaineHealth Institute for Research to proceed without interruption. Maine recorded a record 3,035 cases of Lyme disease last year. This research is important, and a vaccine would mark a significant win in the fight against tick-borne diseases. As Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a member of the HELP Committee, I will continue to advocate for strong federal support for research into these growing public health threats.

Sen. Susan Collins

49,538 просмотров • 1 год назад

Health Canada knew of mRNA vaccine heart risks before rollout, and now young Canadians face the consequences Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada were aware of myocarditis and pericarditis risks linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before granting interim approval to Pfizer in December 2020, internal records confirm. Yet as cases of heart failure climb among previously healthy young Canadians, legacy media outlets and so-called ‘experts’ alike report and comment on the trend without mentioning the well-documented signal. Last week, CTV highlighted a Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Failure Society release warning of a “perfect storm” driving higher diagnoses in adults aged 20 to 40. Cardiologist Dr. Margot Davis noted the increase at specialized clinics, yet the coverage conveniently omitted any reference to COVID-19 vaccination, despite documented risks to heart health. A parliamentary Order Paper response (Q-766) reveals that the first Canadian report of myocarditis or pericarditis following an mRNA injection arrived on December 4, 2020 — that’s five days before Health Canada’s interim authorization of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 9. That safety signal continued to mount throughout the rollout, the official parliamentary response shows. As of January 26, 2026, Health Canada’s Canada Vigilance Program has logged 2,040 domestic and 29,619 foreign reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. Despite early warning signs, public warnings did not appear until closer to June 2021. Internal documents obtained through access-to-information requests and compiled by medical and regulatory investigator Natasha Gonek paint a very clear picture: minutes from the federal Vaccine Vigilance Working Group (records never intended for public release) show myocarditis and pericarditis were tracked as priorities from December 2020 onward. A December 17, 2020, Record of Discussion (ROD) noted that information on myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombotic disorders would be posted online the week of December 21. Despite the seriousness of these risks, that information remained largely buried from public view. Ontario data analyst Kelly Brown identified sharp increases in risk of heart inflammation, primarily among young males, after examining provincial safety signals in early 2021. Other provincial figures and federal monitoring systems told the same story, while Public Health Agency of Canada employees sat on surveillance teams co-authoring studies cited by the department as evidence of safety. Meanwhile, the public received heavily narrative-controlled propaganda intended to preserve the ‘safe and effective’ marketing mantra at all costs. A Privy Council Office memo titled “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization” explicitly discussed managing public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Officials tested language designed to emphasize rarity and preserve trust, rather than to disclose the mounting age- and sex-specific risks. Canadians were repeatedly told that adverse events are rare and that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the unknown risks. Today, some of the young people who were sold this narrative five years ago are now appearing in heart-failure clinics, unable to walk more than a few feet without debilitating exhaustion. This raises alarming, and still very pertinent, questions about the COVID response, such as why early signals were so severely downplayed, whether age- and sex-specific risks were truly communicated transparently, and what follow-up exists for those diagnosed with vaccine-associated myocarditis? Legacy media’s continued silence on the documented timeline only serves to deepen public distrust in institutions that aided in ‘the science is settled’ narrative. The receipts — from internal records, parliamentary answers, and surveillance data — have been available for years, yet the subject remains so taboo that much of the legacy media and expert class still refuse to confront it openly. REPORT by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦

Health Canada knew of mRNA vaccine heart risks before rollout, and now young Canadians face the consequences Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada were aware of myocarditis and pericarditis risks linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before granting interim approval to Pfizer in December 2020, internal records confirm. Yet as cases of heart failure climb among previously healthy young Canadians, legacy media outlets and so-called ‘experts’ alike report and comment on the trend without mentioning the well-documented signal. Last week, CTV highlighted a Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Failure Society release warning of a “perfect storm” driving higher diagnoses in adults aged 20 to 40. Cardiologist Dr. Margot Davis noted the increase at specialized clinics, yet the coverage conveniently omitted any reference to COVID-19 vaccination, despite documented risks to heart health. A parliamentary Order Paper response (Q-766) reveals that the first Canadian report of myocarditis or pericarditis following an mRNA injection arrived on December 4, 2020 — that’s five days before Health Canada’s interim authorization of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 9. That safety signal continued to mount throughout the rollout, the official parliamentary response shows. As of January 26, 2026, Health Canada’s Canada Vigilance Program has logged 2,040 domestic and 29,619 foreign reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. Despite early warning signs, public warnings did not appear until closer to June 2021. Internal documents obtained through access-to-information requests and compiled by medical and regulatory investigator Natasha Gonek paint a very clear picture: minutes from the federal Vaccine Vigilance Working Group (records never intended for public release) show myocarditis and pericarditis were tracked as priorities from December 2020 onward. A December 17, 2020, Record of Discussion (ROD) noted that information on myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombotic disorders would be posted online the week of December 21. Despite the seriousness of these risks, that information remained largely buried from public view. Ontario data analyst Kelly Brown identified sharp increases in risk of heart inflammation, primarily among young males, after examining provincial safety signals in early 2021. Other provincial figures and federal monitoring systems told the same story, while Public Health Agency of Canada employees sat on surveillance teams co-authoring studies cited by the department as evidence of safety. Meanwhile, the public received heavily narrative-controlled propaganda intended to preserve the ‘safe and effective’ marketing mantra at all costs. A Privy Council Office memo titled “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization” explicitly discussed managing public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Officials tested language designed to emphasize rarity and preserve trust, rather than to disclose the mounting age- and sex-specific risks. Canadians were repeatedly told that adverse events are rare and that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the unknown risks. Today, some of the young people who were sold this narrative five years ago are now appearing in heart-failure clinics, unable to walk more than a few feet without debilitating exhaustion. This raises alarming, and still very pertinent, questions about the COVID response, such as why early signals were so severely downplayed, whether age- and sex-specific risks were truly communicated transparently, and what follow-up exists for those diagnosed with vaccine-associated myocarditis? Legacy media’s continued silence on the documented timeline only serves to deepen public distrust in institutions that aided in ‘the science is settled’ narrative. The receipts — from internal records, parliamentary answers, and surveillance data — have been available for years, yet the subject remains so taboo that much of the legacy media and expert class still refuse to confront it openly. REPORT by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦

Rebel News

64,097 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Over 140 years ago, Dr. Henry Littlejohn observed how important FEAR is in the manifestation of disease. He found it wasn’t about a virus or bacteria as much as you FEAR of it. His 25 years of experience with his staff found if you weren’t afraid of the disease, you didn’t get cholera, small-pox, fevers, measles, or whooping cough, and they didn’t transmit to their families either! Remember, this was a time before gowns and masks! They worked with patients in close proximity with their bare hands! “Infectious germs of all kinds have no power of successfully attacking the healthy individual.” Is it time for a complete rethink of our FEAR of germs??? “All medical authorities are agreed that the risk attending the entering a room in which there are cases of infectious disease is infinitesimally small to the healthy individual; and that even where a person actually assists in removing a patient sick of an infectious disorder to another apartment or to a conveyance, while the risk is greater, it is in reality very small to the sound constitution. As a rule, it is rare to find nurses affected who live for hours and days at a time in the same atmosphere with the sick, and who at the same time make use of the simplest precautions. It is still rarer to hear of medical men sickening of infectious diseases caught in their practice, and is well known that medical men never, or very rarely, bring the infection of such diseases to their households. For twenty-five years I have been engaged in active sanitary work, and have had, with very limited staff, to cope with serious outbreaks of Cholera, Small-pox, Fever, Scarlatina, Measles, and Hooping-cough, and although I have during that period brought up a large family, I have never communicated any of these diseases to my children or dependents, nor am I aware that any of the numerous sanitary inspectors who have acted under me have ever contracted or communicated these diseases while in the public service. To live in constant fear of infection is one of the surest methods of courting the risk of an attack. It is a popular, and I believe a true, saying with regard to Cholera, that the fear of it kills more than the scourge itself. This holds equally good for other forms of infection; and the Sanitary Inspector; to be an efficient public servant must be assured of this cardinal fact, that infectious germs of all kinds have no power of successfully attacking the healthy individual.” — Dr. Henry D. Littlejohn, of Edinburg, Medical Officer to the Scottish Board of Health. Henry D. Littlejohn, MD, “Report by Dr. Littlejohn,” The Poor Law Magazine and Parochial Journal, vol. VIII, 1880, Edinburgh, pp. 309-311.

Over 140 years ago, Dr. Henry Littlejohn observed how important FEAR is in the manifestation of disease. He found it wasn’t about a virus or bacteria as much as you FEAR of it. His 25 years of experience with his staff found if you weren’t afraid of the disease, you didn’t get cholera, small-pox, fevers, measles, or whooping cough, and they didn’t transmit to their families either! Remember, this was a time before gowns and masks! They worked with patients in close proximity with their bare hands! “Infectious germs of all kinds have no power of successfully attacking the healthy individual.” Is it time for a complete rethink of our FEAR of germs??? “All medical authorities are agreed that the risk attending the entering a room in which there are cases of infectious disease is infinitesimally small to the healthy individual; and that even where a person actually assists in removing a patient sick of an infectious disorder to another apartment or to a conveyance, while the risk is greater, it is in reality very small to the sound constitution. As a rule, it is rare to find nurses affected who live for hours and days at a time in the same atmosphere with the sick, and who at the same time make use of the simplest precautions. It is still rarer to hear of medical men sickening of infectious diseases caught in their practice, and is well known that medical men never, or very rarely, bring the infection of such diseases to their households. For twenty-five years I have been engaged in active sanitary work, and have had, with very limited staff, to cope with serious outbreaks of Cholera, Small-pox, Fever, Scarlatina, Measles, and Hooping-cough, and although I have during that period brought up a large family, I have never communicated any of these diseases to my children or dependents, nor am I aware that any of the numerous sanitary inspectors who have acted under me have ever contracted or communicated these diseases while in the public service. To live in constant fear of infection is one of the surest methods of courting the risk of an attack. It is a popular, and I believe a true, saying with regard to Cholera, that the fear of it kills more than the scourge itself. This holds equally good for other forms of infection; and the Sanitary Inspector; to be an efficient public servant must be assured of this cardinal fact, that infectious germs of all kinds have no power of successfully attacking the healthy individual.” — Dr. Henry D. Littlejohn, of Edinburg, Medical Officer to the Scottish Board of Health. Henry D. Littlejohn, MD, “Report by Dr. Littlejohn,” The Poor Law Magazine and Parochial Journal, vol. VIII, 1880, Edinburgh, pp. 309-311.

Roman Bystrianyk

17,484 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Hantavirus is not "the next COVID." It's just the new monkeypox. The media's current fear campaign completely ignores how this disease actually works, and the coverage of the cruise ship outbreak is pure catastrophe creation. Here are the clinical facts: • Asymptomatic spread does not happen with this virus. • Human-to-human transmission is highly debatable. • You will not catch this from walking past someone; it spreads via aerosolized rodent droppings. The World Health Organization's response to the outbreak was dangerous. The real threat was trapping exposed passengers inside an unventilated ship where aerosolized dust could actually spread it. What is most troubling is how states like California (and especially Los Angeles) have ignored effective rodent control. They are allowing the true vector of this disease—infected rats and mice—to multiply in our streets and risk infecting the homeless who live near millions of people. If the WHO was truly afraid of Hantavirus, they would address the sprawling encampments in downtown Los Angeles—already a breeding ground for typhus, plague, and worse. Before you panic, ask yourself: why is the press pushing for global fear instead of addressing the real, local public health failures happening right in front of us? Is your local government ignoring a tangible sanitation & homeless crisis to chase global headlines?

Hantavirus is not "the next COVID." It's just the new monkeypox. The media's current fear campaign completely ignores how this disease actually works, and the coverage of the cruise ship outbreak is pure catastrophe creation. Here are the clinical facts: • Asymptomatic spread does not happen with this virus. • Human-to-human transmission is highly debatable. • You will not catch this from walking past someone; it spreads via aerosolized rodent droppings. The World Health Organization's response to the outbreak was dangerous. The real threat was trapping exposed passengers inside an unventilated ship where aerosolized dust could actually spread it. What is most troubling is how states like California (and especially Los Angeles) have ignored effective rodent control. They are allowing the true vector of this disease—infected rats and mice—to multiply in our streets and risk infecting the homeless who live near millions of people. If the WHO was truly afraid of Hantavirus, they would address the sprawling encampments in downtown Los Angeles—already a breeding ground for typhus, plague, and worse. Before you panic, ask yourself: why is the press pushing for global fear instead of addressing the real, local public health failures happening right in front of us? Is your local government ignoring a tangible sanitation & homeless crisis to chase global headlines?

Dr. Drew

30,693 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The government needs to step up its efforts to fight health misinformation, say Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama, because it’s reducing public trust in the medical establishment. “People are dying because of misinformation,” said Obama in a 2022 Stanford speech that promoted a sweeping government censorship agenda. In his new, heavily-promoted Netflix documentary, Gates called for AI-powered mass government censorship of people who raise questions about vaccines, citing the conspiracy theory that microchips were in Covid vaccines. But it’s the medical establishment itself, not misinformation, that causes public distrust, says Johns Hopkins physician Marty Makary MD, MPH in his outstanding new bestseller, Blind Spots, and in a fascinating two-hour conversation with me. “The biggest topic in our medical journals right now is mistrust in the medical establishment,” he said. “They’re scratching their heads. ‘People don’t trust us, and it must be because of those spreading misinformation.’... No, the reason they don’t trust the medical establishment is because it was lying to them for three years during the Covid pandemic.” America’s health and medical system does a lot of good, emphasizes Makary, who also holds a Master’s degree in Public Health (MPH) from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Makary stresses that the overwhelming number of people in the health and medical establishment are well-intentioned and motivated by compassion for their patients and a desire to cure disease. “The rank and file doctor often thinks independently, is creative, and takes in multiple sources of information,” he says. But the health and medical system as a whole has failed, Makary argues. Proof of this can be found in the fact that “half of all federal spending is going to health care in its many hidden forms,” he says, and yet the American people are “getting sicker and sicker… Chronic diseases are on the rise. Cancers are on the rise. And we have the most medicated generation in human history.” Health is arguably the most important issue facing the country. It’s not just a life-and-death issue; it also centrally affects our quality of life. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ poor track record is so scandalous that we will publish a follow-up article on how it is still making recommendations based on ideology, not science. So why has the health and medical establishment caused so much harm? What’s going on? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and listen to the full podcast!

The government needs to step up its efforts to fight health misinformation, say Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama, because it’s reducing public trust in the medical establishment. “People are dying because of misinformation,” said Obama in a 2022 Stanford speech that promoted a sweeping government censorship agenda. In his new, heavily-promoted Netflix documentary, Gates called for AI-powered mass government censorship of people who raise questions about vaccines, citing the conspiracy theory that microchips were in Covid vaccines. But it’s the medical establishment itself, not misinformation, that causes public distrust, says Johns Hopkins physician Marty Makary MD, MPH in his outstanding new bestseller, Blind Spots, and in a fascinating two-hour conversation with me. “The biggest topic in our medical journals right now is mistrust in the medical establishment,” he said. “They’re scratching their heads. ‘People don’t trust us, and it must be because of those spreading misinformation.’... No, the reason they don’t trust the medical establishment is because it was lying to them for three years during the Covid pandemic.” America’s health and medical system does a lot of good, emphasizes Makary, who also holds a Master’s degree in Public Health (MPH) from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Makary stresses that the overwhelming number of people in the health and medical establishment are well-intentioned and motivated by compassion for their patients and a desire to cure disease. “The rank and file doctor often thinks independently, is creative, and takes in multiple sources of information,” he says. But the health and medical system as a whole has failed, Makary argues. Proof of this can be found in the fact that “half of all federal spending is going to health care in its many hidden forms,” he says, and yet the American people are “getting sicker and sicker… Chronic diseases are on the rise. Cancers are on the rise. And we have the most medicated generation in human history.” Health is arguably the most important issue facing the country. It’s not just a life-and-death issue; it also centrally affects our quality of life. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ poor track record is so scandalous that we will publish a follow-up article on how it is still making recommendations based on ideology, not science. So why has the health and medical establishment caused so much harm? What’s going on? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and listen to the full podcast!

Michael Shellenberger

40,542 просмотров • 2 лет назад