Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Popular Kannada YouTuber #SameerMD has recently come under the spotlight after his discussion on the #Dharmasthala's #SoujanyaCase went viral on various social media platforms. The video garnered widespread attention and reactions from netizens. Addressing the backlash, Sameer MD questioned why people were dragging caste and religion into the issue....

HateDetectors's profile picture

Hate Detector 🔍

72,092 subscribers

20,928 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieComedyNachrichten & Politik#SameerMD#Dharmasthala#SoujanyaCase
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

1 Kommentare

Profilbild von km
kmvor 1 Jahr

60% of the information he gave on his YouTube video is fake. He targets anything related to Hindus on his Youtube channel.

Ähnliche Videos

A 40-year-old man allegedly died by suicide on Sunday after a woman posted a video on social media accusing him of sexually harassing her on a bus. The man has been identified as Deepak U, a native of #Govindapuram in #Kozhikode. He was found hanging at his residence early morning. According to police, his parents were home at the time. When he did not respond to repeated calls, neighbours were alerted to the situation, and the door was forced open, following which he was found dead. The incident came to light after a woman shared a video on social media alleging that the man had deliberately touched her with sexual intent while travelling on a crowded bus. The video, reportedly recorded during a journey from Payyannur railway station to the bus stand, went viral and garnered over 20 lakh views, triggering widespread online reactions. According to relatives and friends, he was under severe mental stress after the video went viral and was deeply disturbed by the allegations. His family has alleged that he was subjected to character assassination through social media and claimed that the video was created for online publicity. They have maintained that he was a person who generally stayed away from controversies. Relatives further alleged that the man faced intense online abuse following the circulation of the video. At the same time, the woman who posted the video was also reportedly subjected to cyber attacks. Police said the alleged incident took place in #Payyannur. The Kozhikode Medical College police have registered a case of unnatural death and launched an investigation. Further legal steps will be taken after examining all aspects, including the circumstances leading to the death and the viral social media content. The man was working as a sales manager at a textile store in Kozhikode and frequently travelled for work. Family members said he had travelled to #Kannur last Friday, following which the video surfaced online. Police said the investigation is ongoing.
0:26

A 40-year-old man allegedly died by suicide on Sunday after a woman posted a video on social media accusing him of sexually harassing her on a bus. The man has been identified as Deepak U, a native of #Govindapuram in #Kozhikode. He was found hanging at his residence early morning. According to police, his parents were home at the time. When he did not respond to repeated calls, neighbours were alerted to the situation, and the door was forced open, following which he was found dead. The incident came to light after a woman shared a video on social media alleging that the man had deliberately touched her with sexual intent while travelling on a crowded bus. The video, reportedly recorded during a journey from Payyannur railway station to the bus stand, went viral and garnered over 20 lakh views, triggering widespread online reactions. According to relatives and friends, he was under severe mental stress after the video went viral and was deeply disturbed by the allegations. His family has alleged that he was subjected to character assassination through social media and claimed that the video was created for online publicity. They have maintained that he was a person who generally stayed away from controversies. Relatives further alleged that the man faced intense online abuse following the circulation of the video. At the same time, the woman who posted the video was also reportedly subjected to cyber attacks. Police said the alleged incident took place in #Payyannur. The Kozhikode Medical College police have registered a case of unnatural death and launched an investigation. Further legal steps will be taken after examining all aspects, including the circumstances leading to the death and the viral social media content. The man was working as a sales manager at a textile store in Kozhikode and frequently travelled for work. Family members said he had travelled to #Kannur last Friday, following which the video surfaced online. Police said the investigation is ongoing.

Hate Detector 🔍

65,313 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A 28-year-old businessman in Faridabad died by suicide inside his shop on Sunday after hanging himself. Before taking the extreme step, he posted a video on Instagram in which he accused his wife and her family of mentally harassing him. Police have launched an investigation and are also examining the allegations made in the video. In the Instagram video posted before his death, Rahul accused his wife Jyoti, his mother-in-law Veena, his father-in-law Bittu and his wife's sister Neetu of mentally harassing him. He claimed that despite doing all household chores, including sweeping and washing utensils, he was assaulted, and false cases were filed against him. He said he had been living under constant mental stress. Rahul also said in the video that his wife and her family were responsible for his death and should be punished according to the law. He further said that after his death, his property should go to his mother, sister and brothers. The victim, Rahul, had opened a garment shop around four months ago. According to police, Rahul met his mother at home on Sunday morning before leaving for his shop. A short while later, he hanged himself inside the shop. Police reached the spot after receiving information, took custody of the body and sent it to hospital for post-mortem. According to Rahul's family, he had married a woman named Jyoti in a love marriage around two years ago. They alleged that after the marriage, his wife did not want him to live with his parents, following which he started living separately. They said Rahul had recently opened his new garment shop. A family member, Amit, alleged that Rahul had been under severe mental stress due to harassment by his wife and her family. He claimed that Rahul's wife had also filed a case against him, which added to his stress. The family further alleged that Rahul was not even allowed to meet his parents. Investigating officer Sanjay Kumar said police have sent the body for post-mortem and are investigating the case. He said the viral social media video has been included in the investigation and that the allegations made in it will be verified during the probe.
1:25

A 28-year-old businessman in Faridabad died by suicide inside his shop on Sunday after hanging himself. Before taking the extreme step, he posted a video on Instagram in which he accused his wife and her family of mentally harassing him. Police have launched an investigation and are also examining the allegations made in the video. In the Instagram video posted before his death, Rahul accused his wife Jyoti, his mother-in-law Veena, his father-in-law Bittu and his wife's sister Neetu of mentally harassing him. He claimed that despite doing all household chores, including sweeping and washing utensils, he was assaulted, and false cases were filed against him. He said he had been living under constant mental stress. Rahul also said in the video that his wife and her family were responsible for his death and should be punished according to the law. He further said that after his death, his property should go to his mother, sister and brothers. The victim, Rahul, had opened a garment shop around four months ago. According to police, Rahul met his mother at home on Sunday morning before leaving for his shop. A short while later, he hanged himself inside the shop. Police reached the spot after receiving information, took custody of the body and sent it to hospital for post-mortem. According to Rahul's family, he had married a woman named Jyoti in a love marriage around two years ago. They alleged that after the marriage, his wife did not want him to live with his parents, following which he started living separately. They said Rahul had recently opened his new garment shop. A family member, Amit, alleged that Rahul had been under severe mental stress due to harassment by his wife and her family. He claimed that Rahul's wife had also filed a case against him, which added to his stress. The family further alleged that Rahul was not even allowed to meet his parents. Investigating officer Sanjay Kumar said police have sent the body for post-mortem and are investigating the case. He said the viral social media video has been included in the investigation and that the allegations made in it will be verified during the probe.

Hate Detector 🔍

523,071 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Albert Ojwang Murder Trial: New Details Point to Fatal Assault in Custody, Missing CCTV Footage and Evidence Tampering The murder trial of former Nairobi Central Police Station OCS Samson Talaam and five other accused persons has entered a critical stage after the prosecution presented its opening case, alleging that Albert Omondi Ojwang was deliberately assaulted and killed while in police custody, with the State telling the court it intends to present medical, forensic and witness evidence to challenge the initial explanation that his death resulted from a self inflicted injury. The Director of Public Prosecutions has told the High Court that evidence gathered so far indicates Ojwang died from injuries consistent with a violent assault, including blunt force trauma, neck compression and multiple injuries sustained across his body, with prosecutors arguing that the circumstances surrounding his death point to a deliberate act rather than an accident as previously suggested. The court has also heard testimony from a CCTV technician who examined the Digital Video Recorder at Central Police Station and told the court that the device had been formatted, leaving investigators unable to access footage from the period surrounding Ojwang's death, with the witness further stating that some internal components of the system had been removed before the device was examined by investigators. The prosecution has further outlined a case centred on allegations of an attempted cover-up following Ojwang's death, telling the court it will rely on CCTV analysis, forensic evidence, police records and testimony from officers, family members and medical experts to reconstruct events inside the station and establish what happened after Ojwang was brought into custody alive. Former OCS Samson Talaam and the five co-accused persons have denied the murder charges, with the trial now expected to examine the evidence surrounding Ojwang's arrest, his time in police custody, the circumstances of his death, the handling of evidence afterwards and the individual responsibility of those accused in the case.
7:36

Albert Ojwang Murder Trial: New Details Point to Fatal Assault in Custody, Missing CCTV Footage and Evidence Tampering The murder trial of former Nairobi Central Police Station OCS Samson Talaam and five other accused persons has entered a critical stage after the prosecution presented its opening case, alleging that Albert Omondi Ojwang was deliberately assaulted and killed while in police custody, with the State telling the court it intends to present medical, forensic and witness evidence to challenge the initial explanation that his death resulted from a self inflicted injury. The Director of Public Prosecutions has told the High Court that evidence gathered so far indicates Ojwang died from injuries consistent with a violent assault, including blunt force trauma, neck compression and multiple injuries sustained across his body, with prosecutors arguing that the circumstances surrounding his death point to a deliberate act rather than an accident as previously suggested. The court has also heard testimony from a CCTV technician who examined the Digital Video Recorder at Central Police Station and told the court that the device had been formatted, leaving investigators unable to access footage from the period surrounding Ojwang's death, with the witness further stating that some internal components of the system had been removed before the device was examined by investigators. The prosecution has further outlined a case centred on allegations of an attempted cover-up following Ojwang's death, telling the court it will rely on CCTV analysis, forensic evidence, police records and testimony from officers, family members and medical experts to reconstruct events inside the station and establish what happened after Ojwang was brought into custody alive. Former OCS Samson Talaam and the five co-accused persons have denied the murder charges, with the trial now expected to examine the evidence surrounding Ojwang's arrest, his time in police custody, the circumstances of his death, the handling of evidence afterwards and the individual responsibility of those accused in the case.

John Mutongoi

19,497 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Venkatesh, father of medical student Priyanka, who succumbed to injuries after being allegedly run over by a car, has appealed to the media not to distort his statements and said he was satisfied with the police investigation into the case. In a video message, Venkatesh said his family was already going through immense grief following Priyanka’s death and that reports attributing statements to him that he did not make had caused further mental agony. With folded hands, he appealed to media organisations to broadcast his statements accurately and refrain from attributing false or distorted quotes to him. Speaking about the investigation, Venkatesh said he was satisfied with the response from the police. He said officials had explained the sections registered in the case, the action being taken against the accused and had clarified his doubts. He also said the strictest possible legal provisions had been invoked in the case and expressed satisfaction with the response from Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu, Home Minister Vangalapudi Anitha and the police officials handling the investigation. Venkatesh said justice for his family was his primary concern and appealed to political parties and the media not to use Priyanka’s death for political or other agendas. He urged the authorities to ensure strict legal punishment for those responsible for his daughter’s death.
1:06

Venkatesh, father of medical student Priyanka, who succumbed to injuries after being allegedly run over by a car, has appealed to the media not to distort his statements and said he was satisfied with the police investigation into the case. In a video message, Venkatesh said his family was already going through immense grief following Priyanka’s death and that reports attributing statements to him that he did not make had caused further mental agony. With folded hands, he appealed to media organisations to broadcast his statements accurately and refrain from attributing false or distorted quotes to him. Speaking about the investigation, Venkatesh said he was satisfied with the response from the police. He said officials had explained the sections registered in the case, the action being taken against the accused and had clarified his doubts. He also said the strictest possible legal provisions had been invoked in the case and expressed satisfaction with the response from Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu, Home Minister Vangalapudi Anitha and the police officials handling the investigation. Venkatesh said justice for his family was his primary concern and appealed to political parties and the media not to use Priyanka’s death for political or other agendas. He urged the authorities to ensure strict legal punishment for those responsible for his daughter’s death.

Hate Detector 🔍

11,353 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

VIDEO | Delhi: After 16 years, a Rohini court acquitted all the accused in the 2009 acid attack case of Panipat MBA student Shaheen Malik. The trial, transferred to Delhi in 2013, involved allegations of harassment and conspiracy behind the attack. Victim’s advocate Madiah Shahjar says, “In the Shaheen Malik case, the court acquitted all the accused, citing insufficient evidence, a faulty and incomplete investigation, and the absence of the victim’s evidence on record, though an inquiry has been ordered against the investigating officer. While the court expressed sympathy, it stated that justice, not sympathy, was sought after a 16-year legal battle. The decision will be challenged in the High Court and, if required, in the Supreme Court.” #AcidAttack (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:35

VIDEO | Delhi: After 16 years, a Rohini court acquitted all the accused in the 2009 acid attack case of Panipat MBA student Shaheen Malik. The trial, transferred to Delhi in 2013, involved allegations of harassment and conspiracy behind the attack. Victim’s advocate Madiah Shahjar says, “In the Shaheen Malik case, the court acquitted all the accused, citing insufficient evidence, a faulty and incomplete investigation, and the absence of the victim’s evidence on record, though an inquiry has been ordered against the investigating officer. While the court expressed sympathy, it stated that justice, not sympathy, was sought after a 16-year legal battle. The decision will be challenged in the High Court and, if required, in the Supreme Court.” #AcidAttack (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

45,267 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On social media and child pornography issue, Advocate HS Phoolka says, "... The issue which is going on very prominently these days is that Instagram is promoting the videos of child sexual abuse. On 23rd September 2024, the Supreme Court gave a landmark judgment, Just Rights for Children Alliance versus State of Tamil Nadu. In the judgment, the Supreme Court has clearly said that the social media platforms which are allowing these videos to run should immediately stop them; not only stop the video, but they should also give the information to the police so that action can be taken under the POCSO Act against the person who has downloaded these videos and who has uploaded these videos also. And let me tell you, under this judgment, not only uploading the video is an offence, but downloading and seeing this video is also an offence. This was a case in Tamil Nadu. There is a young boy who had downloaded the child sexual abuse videos and was watching them, and now this is being posted. All the people who are using social media should know that it is being posted by many organisations. One of them is NCMEC in America. All those people who are downloading and watching child sexual abuse photos, they are immediately—the NCMEC learn about it, comes to know about it, and passes on the information to the Government of India, and criminal cases are started against the person who is downloading and watching such cases. The Supreme Court has passed a judgment, and the Supreme Court has said that anybody downloading or watching the child sexual abuse video, he is also liable for imprisonment under the POCSO Act. And the Supreme Court also, in the judgment, has said the intermediary is responsible not only to stop this video but also to inform the police. And if the intermediary does not inform the police, that is, a social media platform does not inform the police, then the social media platform is liable to be prosecuted. Criminal cases should be lodged against the social media platform under the POCSO Act. And in this case, in the Instagram case, not only do they stop the videos, they promote the videos, and they also file an application day-to-day in the Supreme Court. The directions of the Supreme Court are not being followed. In our application, the Supreme Court has issued notice to the Union of India, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and Ministry of Law."
3:07

#WATCH | Delhi: On social media and child pornography issue, Advocate HS Phoolka says, "... The issue which is going on very prominently these days is that Instagram is promoting the videos of child sexual abuse. On 23rd September 2024, the Supreme Court gave a landmark judgment, Just Rights for Children Alliance versus State of Tamil Nadu. In the judgment, the Supreme Court has clearly said that the social media platforms which are allowing these videos to run should immediately stop them; not only stop the video, but they should also give the information to the police so that action can be taken under the POCSO Act against the person who has downloaded these videos and who has uploaded these videos also. And let me tell you, under this judgment, not only uploading the video is an offence, but downloading and seeing this video is also an offence. This was a case in Tamil Nadu. There is a young boy who had downloaded the child sexual abuse videos and was watching them, and now this is being posted. All the people who are using social media should know that it is being posted by many organisations. One of them is NCMEC in America. All those people who are downloading and watching child sexual abuse photos, they are immediately—the NCMEC learn about it, comes to know about it, and passes on the information to the Government of India, and criminal cases are started against the person who is downloading and watching such cases. The Supreme Court has passed a judgment, and the Supreme Court has said that anybody downloading or watching the child sexual abuse video, he is also liable for imprisonment under the POCSO Act. And the Supreme Court also, in the judgment, has said the intermediary is responsible not only to stop this video but also to inform the police. And if the intermediary does not inform the police, that is, a social media platform does not inform the police, then the social media platform is liable to be prosecuted. Criminal cases should be lodged against the social media platform under the POCSO Act. And in this case, in the Instagram case, not only do they stop the videos, they promote the videos, and they also file an application day-to-day in the Supreme Court. The directions of the Supreme Court are not being followed. In our application, the Supreme Court has issued notice to the Union of India, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and Ministry of Law."

ANI

27,187 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Just in: A video from inside a court in occupied Jerusalem shows Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya appearing via video link and attempting to speak with his attorney before Israeli court security blocked the screen and terminated the call, preventing journalists from filming the exchange or the video appearance. I listened carefully to what the attorney was saying to Dr. Abu Safiya. It appeared that Dr. Abu Safiya could not hear him. The attorney repeatedly stated that he could neither see nor hear Dr. Abu Safiya after his “captors turned off the camera.” He also informed him that some people were present in the courtroom to show their support and that they were waiting for the judge to arrive so that he could be brought back on screen before the court addressed the appeal. This is Israel’s democracy. Dr. Abu Safiya has been subjected to starvation, abuse, and cruel torture, and this latest development only adds to concerns about the conditions he has endured and the lack of public scrutiny surrounding his case.
1:01

Just in: A video from inside a court in occupied Jerusalem shows Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya appearing via video link and attempting to speak with his attorney before Israeli court security blocked the screen and terminated the call, preventing journalists from filming the exchange or the video appearance. I listened carefully to what the attorney was saying to Dr. Abu Safiya. It appeared that Dr. Abu Safiya could not hear him. The attorney repeatedly stated that he could neither see nor hear Dr. Abu Safiya after his “captors turned off the camera.” He also informed him that some people were present in the courtroom to show their support and that they were waiting for the judge to arrive so that he could be brought back on screen before the court addressed the appeal. This is Israel’s democracy. Dr. Abu Safiya has been subjected to starvation, abuse, and cruel torture, and this latest development only adds to concerns about the conditions he has endured and the lack of public scrutiny surrounding his case.

Mosab Abu Toha

259,265 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

UK-based Nigerian Doctor Loses Custody Of Son After Flogging Him With Belt A Nigerian doctor based in the United Kingdom has lost custody of his 16-year-old son to the government after flogging him with a belt. This was revealed by a child rights advocate known as pepstalk1 on her Instagram page on Wednesday. She narrated that the Nigerian doctor flogged his son after he caught him and his friends invited over to study together watching an inappropriate video. His friends reportedly informed the police and told them that while the father was beating his son with a belt, the doctor repeatedly said, "Is this how you want to become a doctor?" In the video, she could be seen in front of the court where the case was being held while giving an account of the case. She said, "In court, the 16-year-old told the court that his father always flogs him and is forcing him to choose a career he doesn’t want. "After listening to the boy’s testimony, the court ordered that the boy be taken away from his father and he will remain in the custody of the UK government." Credit: Instagram | pepstalk1 -- Follow us for more breaking news and videos
1:29

UK-based Nigerian Doctor Loses Custody Of Son After Flogging Him With Belt A Nigerian doctor based in the United Kingdom has lost custody of his 16-year-old son to the government after flogging him with a belt. This was revealed by a child rights advocate known as pepstalk1 on her Instagram page on Wednesday. She narrated that the Nigerian doctor flogged his son after he caught him and his friends invited over to study together watching an inappropriate video. His friends reportedly informed the police and told them that while the father was beating his son with a belt, the doctor repeatedly said, "Is this how you want to become a doctor?" In the video, she could be seen in front of the court where the case was being held while giving an account of the case. She said, "In court, the 16-year-old told the court that his father always flogs him and is forcing him to choose a career he doesn’t want. "After listening to the boy’s testimony, the court ordered that the boy be taken away from his father and he will remain in the custody of the UK government." Credit: Instagram | pepstalk1 -- Follow us for more breaking news and videos

Punch Newspapers

765,781 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.
9:05

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.

ರವಿ ಕೀರ್ತಿ ಗೌಡ

16,409 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

It's been almost three years since August of 2022, but I don't think anyone realizes what David Yannetti accomplished with the Karen Read defense. Yes, Alan, Aidan, Eliza Little, the Boston DOJ and others put in work, but do not forget that real power moves in humble silence. TRANSCRIPT: **David Yannetti:** Today was my client's first appearance after her Superior Court arraignment. And as you would expect, we are now starting the discovery process in Superior Court. The history of this case was such that while the case was pending for months in the district court, we had a lot of difficulty getting cooperation from the prosecution in turning over the information that they had. We had more than one court date where there was a big fight in court where we were pushing to get the information that we needed. And [the prosecution team] were essentially giving us the stiff arm in district court. Now that the case has been indicted, I'm pleased to say that the spigot has started to open up a little bit. We got some further material today, which we are going to review, cross-reference against what we have. And I think the theme for the day, really the theme for the past several months, is that with each new piece of evidence that comes in, we're more and more convinced of my client's innocence. Each new piece of evidence appears to corroborate that, and we're doggedly investigating this case to exonerate her, which we're confident she will be if this case ever goes to trial. **Court TV Interviewer:** What do you say if? What could stop it at this point? **David Yannetti:** The only thing that could stop this case from going to trial is if the prosecution becomes convinced of my client's innocence as we are. So, you know, if the question was, "Will there be a plea deal in this case?" That's off the table. I have an innocent client who looks forward to going to trial on this case, but I believe there may come a point where the prosecution sees the evidence that we have, and maybe they realize that they were wrong from the start. **Court TV Interviewer:** What can you tell us about what you have, the picture, the starting time, the image of what you're gathering? **David Yannetti:** So, I'm not prepared to reveal the evidence in our possession, mainly because we're using that evidence as a springboard to get further evidence. And, you know, before I begin revealing, you know, material of that nature, I need to complete my investigation. So, there's not, you know, a rush to reveal our defense. We're preparing our defense, but the truth will come out in time.
2:36

It's been almost three years since August of 2022, but I don't think anyone realizes what David Yannetti accomplished with the Karen Read defense. Yes, Alan, Aidan, Eliza Little, the Boston DOJ and others put in work, but do not forget that real power moves in humble silence. TRANSCRIPT: **David Yannetti:** Today was my client's first appearance after her Superior Court arraignment. And as you would expect, we are now starting the discovery process in Superior Court. The history of this case was such that while the case was pending for months in the district court, we had a lot of difficulty getting cooperation from the prosecution in turning over the information that they had. We had more than one court date where there was a big fight in court where we were pushing to get the information that we needed. And [the prosecution team] were essentially giving us the stiff arm in district court. Now that the case has been indicted, I'm pleased to say that the spigot has started to open up a little bit. We got some further material today, which we are going to review, cross-reference against what we have. And I think the theme for the day, really the theme for the past several months, is that with each new piece of evidence that comes in, we're more and more convinced of my client's innocence. Each new piece of evidence appears to corroborate that, and we're doggedly investigating this case to exonerate her, which we're confident she will be if this case ever goes to trial. **Court TV Interviewer:** What do you say if? What could stop it at this point? **David Yannetti:** The only thing that could stop this case from going to trial is if the prosecution becomes convinced of my client's innocence as we are. So, you know, if the question was, "Will there be a plea deal in this case?" That's off the table. I have an innocent client who looks forward to going to trial on this case, but I believe there may come a point where the prosecution sees the evidence that we have, and maybe they realize that they were wrong from the start. **Court TV Interviewer:** What can you tell us about what you have, the picture, the starting time, the image of what you're gathering? **David Yannetti:** So, I'm not prepared to reveal the evidence in our possession, mainly because we're using that evidence as a springboard to get further evidence. And, you know, before I begin revealing, you know, material of that nature, I need to complete my investigation. So, there's not, you know, a rush to reveal our defense. We're preparing our defense, but the truth will come out in time.

Grant Smith Ellis

31,789 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

#WATCH | Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI investigation into RG Kar Medical College and Hospital rape-murder incident. Advocate Billwadal Bhattacharyya says, "...There were statements made by the Chief Minister that they have no objection in transferring the case to the CBI but it was made time bound that after expiry of this particular period of time, we will transfer it to the CBI. But we say that this delay will be very fatal because evidence will be destroyed. So the court has heard the arguments of the parties. Today the parents of the victim girl, they also were there before the Court by way of a petition. And I contended on behalf of my clients, that despite this gruesome murder, despite the body being in such a bloodied state and half naked, the police was casual enough to register a suicide case and it took quite a lot of time for the police to basically register an FIR and thereafter arrest someone. So this was enough to indicate how casual the attitude of the police was. We are rather thankful and grateful to the Court that the case has been now handed over to CBI. We also wanted the investigation to be monitored by the Court. Now the Court has also directed the CBI to file periodic reports. In the event the parents of the deceased girl feel threatened, the CBI should always take all the necessary steps to give them protection under the witness protection scheme."
1:54

#WATCH | Calcutta High Court ordered a CBI investigation into RG Kar Medical College and Hospital rape-murder incident. Advocate Billwadal Bhattacharyya says, "...There were statements made by the Chief Minister that they have no objection in transferring the case to the CBI but it was made time bound that after expiry of this particular period of time, we will transfer it to the CBI. But we say that this delay will be very fatal because evidence will be destroyed. So the court has heard the arguments of the parties. Today the parents of the victim girl, they also were there before the Court by way of a petition. And I contended on behalf of my clients, that despite this gruesome murder, despite the body being in such a bloodied state and half naked, the police was casual enough to register a suicide case and it took quite a lot of time for the police to basically register an FIR and thereafter arrest someone. So this was enough to indicate how casual the attitude of the police was. We are rather thankful and grateful to the Court that the case has been now handed over to CBI. We also wanted the investigation to be monitored by the Court. Now the Court has also directed the CBI to file periodic reports. In the event the parents of the deceased girl feel threatened, the CBI should always take all the necessary steps to give them protection under the witness protection scheme."

ANI

36,332 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

SANJIV BHATT: WHEN LAW, POWER, AND PUBLIC TRUST COLLIDE The accompanying material presents the second part of the story surrounding former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, focusing on allegations linked to the 2002 Gujarat riots, the custodial death case from 1990, and the sharply contrasting narratives that continue to divide public opinion. According to the source, Bhatt claimed that he possessed information relating to the alleged killers of former Gujarat minister Haren Pandya and that he faced pressure to destroy evidence. He also alleged that he repeatedly warned authorities about the deteriorating situation during the 2002 Gujarat riots, including the danger faced by people at Gulberg Society. These allegations were later placed before investigative agencies and judicial forums. The video also notes that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) did not find sufficient evidence to support these allegations and gave a clean chit to the then Chief Minister, a conclusion later accepted by the Supreme Court. These findings remain an important part of the legal record, even as critics continue to question aspects of the investigation. The second major issue concerns the 1990 custodial death of Prabhudas Vaishnani. The source states that the case was initially closed after investigation but was reopened years later. In 2019, a trial court convicted Bhatt and sentenced him to life imprisonment, a conviction that was upheld by the Gujarat High Court in 2024, while the Supreme Court declined to grant relief. The courts relied on witness testimony and medical evidence in reaching their conclusions. The video also describes Bhatt's tenure as Superintendent of Sabarmati Central Jail, claiming that he introduced reforms that improved prison conditions and earned the respect of many inmates. The source presents this as evidence of the complexity of his public image. Ultimately, the story portrays two competing narratives. One views Sanjiv Bhatt as an honest police officer who suffered for challenging those in power. The other holds that the judicial process established his criminal liability in the custodial death case and that court verdicts must be respected. Whatever one's perspective, the case underscores the importance of independent investigations, judicial transparency, accountability of public officials, and public confidence in the rule of law. In a constitutional democracy, both the pursuit of truth and respect for due process are essential. Where questions remain, they should be addressed through credible evidence, transparent institutions, and impartial justice—not through political loyalty or public emotion alone. Source: Facebook Video:
5:55

SANJIV BHATT: WHEN LAW, POWER, AND PUBLIC TRUST COLLIDE The accompanying material presents the second part of the story surrounding former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, focusing on allegations linked to the 2002 Gujarat riots, the custodial death case from 1990, and the sharply contrasting narratives that continue to divide public opinion. According to the source, Bhatt claimed that he possessed information relating to the alleged killers of former Gujarat minister Haren Pandya and that he faced pressure to destroy evidence. He also alleged that he repeatedly warned authorities about the deteriorating situation during the 2002 Gujarat riots, including the danger faced by people at Gulberg Society. These allegations were later placed before investigative agencies and judicial forums. The video also notes that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) did not find sufficient evidence to support these allegations and gave a clean chit to the then Chief Minister, a conclusion later accepted by the Supreme Court. These findings remain an important part of the legal record, even as critics continue to question aspects of the investigation. The second major issue concerns the 1990 custodial death of Prabhudas Vaishnani. The source states that the case was initially closed after investigation but was reopened years later. In 2019, a trial court convicted Bhatt and sentenced him to life imprisonment, a conviction that was upheld by the Gujarat High Court in 2024, while the Supreme Court declined to grant relief. The courts relied on witness testimony and medical evidence in reaching their conclusions. The video also describes Bhatt's tenure as Superintendent of Sabarmati Central Jail, claiming that he introduced reforms that improved prison conditions and earned the respect of many inmates. The source presents this as evidence of the complexity of his public image. Ultimately, the story portrays two competing narratives. One views Sanjiv Bhatt as an honest police officer who suffered for challenging those in power. The other holds that the judicial process established his criminal liability in the custodial death case and that court verdicts must be respected. Whatever one's perspective, the case underscores the importance of independent investigations, judicial transparency, accountability of public officials, and public confidence in the rule of law. In a constitutional democracy, both the pursuit of truth and respect for due process are essential. Where questions remain, they should be addressed through credible evidence, transparent institutions, and impartial justice—not through political loyalty or public emotion alone. Source: Facebook Video:

Ashok Dadhwal

32,687 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On representing Disha Salian's father, Satish Salian, Advocate Nilesh Ojha says, "This case was heard over two days—arguments were heard thoroughly on both the first day and today. It became clear in court that the documents prepared by the police were flawed. The Court clarified at the outset that it could not conduct an inquiry treating this as an accidental death; the complaint was regarding gang rape and murder. Under Section 174 of the CrPC, they have no authority to investigate a complaint of murder and gang rape. Regarding the case closure on February 4, 2021—if the case was closed then, under which legal provision did they reopen it? There is no provision for reopening such a case; the Supreme Court has clarified this, and the Court cited that Supreme Court judgment to them. When asked to show the provision authorizing their investigation, they failed to do so, proving their actions wrong. Furthermore, an investigation to identify the accused and the perpetrator can only take place after an FIR is registered—a point established by Supreme Court precedents... The story presented in the affidavit differed; it claimed a PSI was calling from the location and that there was no cloth covering Disha's eyes. The Court exposed this falsehood today... The court pointed out that while the claim was that she fell from the 14th floor—landing face-down, resulting in a smashed face and lost teeth—the nose, the entire head, and the skull remained intact. The court questioned how only the teeth could be broken given those circumstances... The court observed that there were sufficient grounds to raise suspicion or to order a CBI investigation. When asked for a response to this, the government counsel could not provide an answer; they merely kept recounting sensational stories rather than citing the law. Therefore, in our view, the case is legally strong in our favor..."
4:01

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On representing Disha Salian's father, Satish Salian, Advocate Nilesh Ojha says, "This case was heard over two days—arguments were heard thoroughly on both the first day and today. It became clear in court that the documents prepared by the police were flawed. The Court clarified at the outset that it could not conduct an inquiry treating this as an accidental death; the complaint was regarding gang rape and murder. Under Section 174 of the CrPC, they have no authority to investigate a complaint of murder and gang rape. Regarding the case closure on February 4, 2021—if the case was closed then, under which legal provision did they reopen it? There is no provision for reopening such a case; the Supreme Court has clarified this, and the Court cited that Supreme Court judgment to them. When asked to show the provision authorizing their investigation, they failed to do so, proving their actions wrong. Furthermore, an investigation to identify the accused and the perpetrator can only take place after an FIR is registered—a point established by Supreme Court precedents... The story presented in the affidavit differed; it claimed a PSI was calling from the location and that there was no cloth covering Disha's eyes. The Court exposed this falsehood today... The court pointed out that while the claim was that she fell from the 14th floor—landing face-down, resulting in a smashed face and lost teeth—the nose, the entire head, and the skull remained intact. The court questioned how only the teeth could be broken given those circumstances... The court observed that there were sufficient grounds to raise suspicion or to order a CBI investigation. When asked for a response to this, the government counsel could not provide an answer; they merely kept recounting sensational stories rather than citing the law. Therefore, in our view, the case is legally strong in our favor..."

ANI

41,755 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || info@vendr.ng ||
9:20

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || [email protected] ||

Trending Explained

103,162 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 The attorney for Erika Kirk and the family just addressed Judge Graf directly. His argument: the family hasn't seen the video evidence, and they should get to. His words to the court: "There's a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth." And on what this hearing is really about: "This is about allowing the family to see the evidence" gathered after a 10 month investigation "in which a father, a husband was assassinated." He asked the judge to let the family view the video the way the court has, so they can process the moment. For the record: this is the victim's representative speaking, not the state and not the defense. Three different sets of lawyers, three different interests in that room.
1:32

🚨 The attorney for Erika Kirk and the family just addressed Judge Graf directly. His argument: the family hasn't seen the video evidence, and they should get to. His words to the court: "There's a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth." And on what this hearing is really about: "This is about allowing the family to see the evidence" gathered after a 10 month investigation "in which a father, a husband was assassinated." He asked the judge to let the family view the video the way the court has, so they can process the moment. For the record: this is the victim's representative speaking, not the state and not the defense. Three different sets of lawyers, three different interests in that room.

Danks

22,478 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.
0:36

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.

Mario Nawfal

3,646,145 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."
1:27

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

Eric Daugherty

140,799 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

‼️UPDATE ON THE CASE AGAINST BILL GATES, ALBERT BOURLA (PFIZER CEO) AND THE DUTCH STATE‼️ 🔥THE NARRATIVE ON TRIAL THE FIGHT CONTINUES🔥 For those asking what happens next in the Dutch Covid litigation; the main case is moving forward and a full hearing on the merits is scheduled for 22nd October 2026 in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. This is NOT the procedural appeal hearing from March - which was a second, separate (though connected) case. This is the main case itself! The claimants - who were coerced through fear campaigns, relentless propaganda and instituional deception into taking covid injections that injured them - will have the opportunity to present their case in full, submit evidence, and bring forward expert testimony in open court. Peter Stassen has stated that he will bring the proposed experts (who appear in this short video) into court and that he requires no permission from the court to do so, because this is a procedural right embedded in procedural law. He has also confirmed that new evidence can still be introduced up until one month before the hearing and says he intends to present even more conclusive evidence! Despite the attempt to shut down the separate evidentiary appeal on procedural grounds, the core case remains fully alive. Nothing has been decided yet on substance. The 22nd October is when this fight continues, and I will be attending and covering in full! Please see links in comments for previous coverage and to understand this case in full! Video Credit: Recht Oprecht
1:27

‼️UPDATE ON THE CASE AGAINST BILL GATES, ALBERT BOURLA (PFIZER CEO) AND THE DUTCH STATE‼️ 🔥THE NARRATIVE ON TRIAL THE FIGHT CONTINUES🔥 For those asking what happens next in the Dutch Covid litigation; the main case is moving forward and a full hearing on the merits is scheduled for 22nd October 2026 in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. This is NOT the procedural appeal hearing from March - which was a second, separate (though connected) case. This is the main case itself! The claimants - who were coerced through fear campaigns, relentless propaganda and instituional deception into taking covid injections that injured them - will have the opportunity to present their case in full, submit evidence, and bring forward expert testimony in open court. Peter Stassen has stated that he will bring the proposed experts (who appear in this short video) into court and that he requires no permission from the court to do so, because this is a procedural right embedded in procedural law. He has also confirmed that new evidence can still be introduced up until one month before the hearing and says he intends to present even more conclusive evidence! Despite the attempt to shut down the separate evidentiary appeal on procedural grounds, the core case remains fully alive. Nothing has been decided yet on substance. The 22nd October is when this fight continues, and I will be attending and covering in full! Please see links in comments for previous coverage and to understand this case in full! Video Credit: Recht Oprecht

Fiona Rose Diamond

20,610 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi
26:32

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi

mmatigari

20,172 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr