正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

President Kagame had warned that Kinshasa might delay the implementation of the Washington peace deal precisely because Tshisekedi and his backers did not get everything they wanted. While Kinshasa tried to portray the conflict as purely economic, which was a misleading interpretation of the crisis, President Kagame thanked the...

IsabelleKarake's profile picture

Isabelle Karake

2,272 subscribers

73,282 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Trump’s senior adviser, Massad Boulos (U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs) reiterated that the Washington accords between #Rwanda and the #DRC were only the launchpad for the peace process, and that they complement the Doha track between AFC/M23 and Kinshasa, which still needs to be completed for a comprehensive peace agreement. The Tshisekedi regime, which had hoped to sidestep the Doha process, is in for a rude awakening. Cc: Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼 Sugira Mireille🇨🇩 Bojana Coulibaly, Ph.D. Bertrand Bisimwa Manzi Willy Alex Mvuka, Ph.D.
0:43

Trump’s senior adviser, Massad Boulos (U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs) reiterated that the Washington accords between #Rwanda and the #DRC were only the launchpad for the peace process, and that they complement the Doha track between AFC/M23 and Kinshasa, which still needs to be completed for a comprehensive peace agreement. The Tshisekedi regime, which had hoped to sidestep the Doha process, is in for a rude awakening. Cc: Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼 Sugira Mireille🇨🇩 Bojana Coulibaly, Ph.D. Bertrand Bisimwa Manzi Willy Alex Mvuka, Ph.D.

Isabelle Karake

39,477 次观看 • 7 个月前

Western media, some of whose members are clearly on Kinshasa’s payroll, are still pushing for sanctions on #Rwanda. They seem obsessed with President Kagame. Instead of calling for sanctions against those killing civilians in Minembwe, this guy pulled a Hariana Verras on Boulos, who simply refused to “speculate” on President Trump’s final decision. U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs himself isn’t being entirely straight either. He says AFC/M23 took measures to facilitate peace efforts, but he overlooked key facts: that since their withdrawal from Uvira and parts of Fizi territory, Banyamulenge civilian properties were looted, M23 perceived sympathizers were killed in Uvira, and Banyamulenge have been under constant bombardment by Kinshasa’s genocidal coalition in Minembwe. And yet Boulos did issue a statement calling for an end to drone attacks on civilians.👇 If Western media and American mediators won’t put the lives of Congolese Tutsi facing genocidal threats at the center of their concerns, they shouldn’t expect Africans to follow their cold, callous calculations. AFC/M23 and Twirwaneho will defend their people until the genocidaires are neutralized. Cc: Bojana Coulibaly, Ph.D. Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼 Robert Cyubahiro McKenna
1:43

Western media, some of whose members are clearly on Kinshasa’s payroll, are still pushing for sanctions on #Rwanda. They seem obsessed with President Kagame. Instead of calling for sanctions against those killing civilians in Minembwe, this guy pulled a Hariana Verras on Boulos, who simply refused to “speculate” on President Trump’s final decision. U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs himself isn’t being entirely straight either. He says AFC/M23 took measures to facilitate peace efforts, but he overlooked key facts: that since their withdrawal from Uvira and parts of Fizi territory, Banyamulenge civilian properties were looted, M23 perceived sympathizers were killed in Uvira, and Banyamulenge have been under constant bombardment by Kinshasa’s genocidal coalition in Minembwe. And yet Boulos did issue a statement calling for an end to drone attacks on civilians.👇 If Western media and American mediators won’t put the lives of Congolese Tutsi facing genocidal threats at the center of their concerns, they shouldn’t expect Africans to follow their cold, callous calculations. AFC/M23 and Twirwaneho will defend their people until the genocidaires are neutralized. Cc: Bojana Coulibaly, Ph.D. Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼 Robert Cyubahiro McKenna

Isabelle Karake

20,442 次观看 • 7 个月前

Diplomatic Checkmate Against the Kigali Regime. (Full video of Michael Waltz's intervention). Very harsh statements from the United States Ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, against the Kigali regime, during the emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council on the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In his speech, he firmly condemns Rwanda for its direct support to the M23, explicitly states that Rwandan troops (Rwandan Defence Forces, RDF) are deployed alongside the M23 rebels in eastern Congo (notably in Uvira, South Kivu), and describes this as deliberate sabotage of the peace agreements recently signed in Washington. He mentions recent field evidence, including the use of surface-to-air missiles by Rwandan forces and strategic involvement in planning offensives. Waltz states that the United States will use “all tools at its disposal” to hold Rwanda accountable and demands an immediate withdrawal of Rwandan troops from Congolese territory. Some excerpts: “Since its re-emergence in 2021, Rwanda has had strategic control of its proxy armed group M23 as well as the political wing of M23, the Congo River Alliance or AFC, and has deployed M23 and the AFC to achieve Rwanda's geopolitical objectives.” “In eastern DRC, Kigali has been intimately involved in the planning and execution of the war in eastern DRC, providing military and political direction to M23 forces and the AFC.” “For years, the Rwandan Defence Forces have provided materiel, logistical support, and training to M23 as well as participation in combat alongside M23 in DRC with approximately 5,000 to 7,000 soldiers as of early December.” “Not counting possible Rwandan military reinforcements in this most recent advance.” “We have credible reports of increased use of suicide drones.” “Increased use of artillery by M23 and Rwanda” “including strikes in Burundi.” “We will use the tools at our disposal to hold peace saboteurs accountable.” “We call on Rwanda to respect its commitments and to further recognize the government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo's right to defend its territory and its sovereign right to invite Burundian forces onto its territory.” “The fact that UN peacekeepers are besieged by forces supported by a Member State that itself contributes troops to peacekeeping missions is, frankly, a sad hypocrisy...”
6:25

Diplomatic Checkmate Against the Kigali Regime. (Full video of Michael Waltz's intervention). Very harsh statements from the United States Ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, against the Kigali regime, during the emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council on the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In his speech, he firmly condemns Rwanda for its direct support to the M23, explicitly states that Rwandan troops (Rwandan Defence Forces, RDF) are deployed alongside the M23 rebels in eastern Congo (notably in Uvira, South Kivu), and describes this as deliberate sabotage of the peace agreements recently signed in Washington. He mentions recent field evidence, including the use of surface-to-air missiles by Rwandan forces and strategic involvement in planning offensives. Waltz states that the United States will use “all tools at its disposal” to hold Rwanda accountable and demands an immediate withdrawal of Rwandan troops from Congolese territory. Some excerpts: “Since its re-emergence in 2021, Rwanda has had strategic control of its proxy armed group M23 as well as the political wing of M23, the Congo River Alliance or AFC, and has deployed M23 and the AFC to achieve Rwanda's geopolitical objectives.” “In eastern DRC, Kigali has been intimately involved in the planning and execution of the war in eastern DRC, providing military and political direction to M23 forces and the AFC.” “For years, the Rwandan Defence Forces have provided materiel, logistical support, and training to M23 as well as participation in combat alongside M23 in DRC with approximately 5,000 to 7,000 soldiers as of early December.” “Not counting possible Rwandan military reinforcements in this most recent advance.” “We have credible reports of increased use of suicide drones.” “Increased use of artillery by M23 and Rwanda” “including strikes in Burundi.” “We will use the tools at our disposal to hold peace saboteurs accountable.” “We call on Rwanda to respect its commitments and to further recognize the government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo's right to defend its territory and its sovereign right to invite Burundian forces onto its territory.” “The fact that UN peacekeepers are besieged by forces supported by a Member State that itself contributes troops to peacekeeping missions is, frankly, a sad hypocrisy...”

Jean-François Le Drian

10,052 次观看 • 9 个月前

At the UN Security Council meeting on the DRC, China said the quiet part out loud: The Doha process must be accelerated and brought to a conclusion so a comprehensive peace agreement can finally be reached. This is the only sensible position, and frankly the kind of clarity one would expect from the US representative, especially since Massad Boulos (U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs ), Trump’s senior adviser on African Affairs and a central figure in these negotiations, has himself said that Doha is the missing piece of the puzzle. Without a peace deal between Kinshasa and M23 in Doha, the fighting will continue. And we all know Kinshasa has been dragging its feet on this front, all while continuing to violate the ceasefire. China understands the critical role of the Doha track. Unlike its Western counterparts, it is openly calling on them to drop their geopolitical games, stop taking sides, and pursue peace seriously. That is what responsible global powers are supposed to do at the Security Council. After failing to uphold their responsibility to protect Congolese Tutsi, Western powers should at least try to redeem themselves by working for peace. Of course, don’t expect Western media to highlight this. So spread the message.
0:41

At the UN Security Council meeting on the DRC, China said the quiet part out loud: The Doha process must be accelerated and brought to a conclusion so a comprehensive peace agreement can finally be reached. This is the only sensible position, and frankly the kind of clarity one would expect from the US representative, especially since Massad Boulos (U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs ), Trump’s senior adviser on African Affairs and a central figure in these negotiations, has himself said that Doha is the missing piece of the puzzle. Without a peace deal between Kinshasa and M23 in Doha, the fighting will continue. And we all know Kinshasa has been dragging its feet on this front, all while continuing to violate the ceasefire. China understands the critical role of the Doha track. Unlike its Western counterparts, it is openly calling on them to drop their geopolitical games, stop taking sides, and pursue peace seriously. That is what responsible global powers are supposed to do at the Security Council. After failing to uphold their responsibility to protect Congolese Tutsi, Western powers should at least try to redeem themselves by working for peace. Of course, don’t expect Western media to highlight this. So spread the message.

Isabelle Karake

96,843 次观看 • 9 个月前

#TRANSCRIBED The U.S. warned that it is going to use “tools at its disposal” to hold Rwanda accountable, a "spoilers to peace”, referring to both Rwanda and M23. READ THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF THE UNITED STATES' DURING TODAY'S UN SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING The United States is profoundly concerned and deeply disappointed by the renewed outbreak of violence in Eastern DRC. Today, I want to share additional information on the scale and sophistication of Rwanda’s involvement in the region. Since its re-emergence in 2021, Rwanda has maintained strategic control over its proxy armed group, M23, as well as M23’s political wing, the Congo River Alliance, also known as the AFC. Rwanda has deployed M23 and the AFC to further its geopolitical ambitions in Eastern DRC. Kigali has been directly involved in planning and executing the war, providing both military and political direction to M23 and the AFC. For years, the Rwandan Defence Forces (RDF) have supplied material, logistical, and training support to M23, and have fought alongside them in the DRC with approximately 5,000 to 7,000 troops as of early December — not accounting for any additional deployments during the recent escalation. In recent months, Rwanda has deployed multiple surface-to-air missile systems and other heavy, sophisticated weaponry into North and South Kivu to support M23 in its ongoing conflict with the DRC. Just this past weekend, M23 and Rwandan forces launched an offensive to seize Uvira, with RDF forces co-located on the frontlines with M23 fighters. We also have credible reports of increased use of suicide drones and artillery by both M23 and Rwanda, including artillery strikes into Burundi. Rather than a march toward peace — as seen in recent weeks under the leadership of President Trump through the Washington Accords — Rwanda is instead dragging the region back into greater instability and war. In light of the commitments made in Washington, we are deeply concerned about the continued presence of Rwandan military forces on Congolese soil in support of M23. The United States will use every tool at our disposal to hold accountable the spoilers of peace. We call on Rwanda to uphold its commitments and to fully recognize the Democratic Republic of Congo’s sovereign right to defend its territory, including the right to invite Burundian forces onto its land in response to aggression. We are engaging with all parties to urge restraint and to prevent further escalation — including calling for an end to hostile and ethnically charged anti-Tutsi rhetoric. As this Council continues to negotiate the renewal of the MONUSCO mandate, the United States will seek to ensure that the mission is empowered to support both the Doha and Washington agreements. While the parties themselves bear full responsibility for implementing these agreements, MONUSCO must have the freedom and capability to operate — including unimpeded mobility and logistical support. It is a sad hypocrisy that UN peacekeepers are under siege from forces backed by a UN member state — a state which also contributes troops to peacekeeping missions. The months-long M23 blockade on MONUSCO has severely impaired its ability to operate in and around Goma, as many have highlighted today. Furthermore, Rwanda continues to deploy surface-to-air missiles and conducts spoofing and jamming operations, effectively grounding MONUSCO’s air assets. Under such conditions, how can MONUSCO succeed? We demand the immediate cessation of these obstructions, which violate Rwanda’s and M23’s obligations under the Doha and Washington Agreements. The United States remains firm in its support for MONUSCO and its critical role in realizing these historic agreements, which we believe hold the potential to finally end decades of suffering in Eastern DRC.
5:39

#TRANSCRIBED The U.S. warned that it is going to use “tools at its disposal” to hold Rwanda accountable, a "spoilers to peace”, referring to both Rwanda and M23. READ THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OF THE UNITED STATES' DURING TODAY'S UN SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING The United States is profoundly concerned and deeply disappointed by the renewed outbreak of violence in Eastern DRC. Today, I want to share additional information on the scale and sophistication of Rwanda’s involvement in the region. Since its re-emergence in 2021, Rwanda has maintained strategic control over its proxy armed group, M23, as well as M23’s political wing, the Congo River Alliance, also known as the AFC. Rwanda has deployed M23 and the AFC to further its geopolitical ambitions in Eastern DRC. Kigali has been directly involved in planning and executing the war, providing both military and political direction to M23 and the AFC. For years, the Rwandan Defence Forces (RDF) have supplied material, logistical, and training support to M23, and have fought alongside them in the DRC with approximately 5,000 to 7,000 troops as of early December — not accounting for any additional deployments during the recent escalation. In recent months, Rwanda has deployed multiple surface-to-air missile systems and other heavy, sophisticated weaponry into North and South Kivu to support M23 in its ongoing conflict with the DRC. Just this past weekend, M23 and Rwandan forces launched an offensive to seize Uvira, with RDF forces co-located on the frontlines with M23 fighters. We also have credible reports of increased use of suicide drones and artillery by both M23 and Rwanda, including artillery strikes into Burundi. Rather than a march toward peace — as seen in recent weeks under the leadership of President Trump through the Washington Accords — Rwanda is instead dragging the region back into greater instability and war. In light of the commitments made in Washington, we are deeply concerned about the continued presence of Rwandan military forces on Congolese soil in support of M23. The United States will use every tool at our disposal to hold accountable the spoilers of peace. We call on Rwanda to uphold its commitments and to fully recognize the Democratic Republic of Congo’s sovereign right to defend its territory, including the right to invite Burundian forces onto its land in response to aggression. We are engaging with all parties to urge restraint and to prevent further escalation — including calling for an end to hostile and ethnically charged anti-Tutsi rhetoric. As this Council continues to negotiate the renewal of the MONUSCO mandate, the United States will seek to ensure that the mission is empowered to support both the Doha and Washington agreements. While the parties themselves bear full responsibility for implementing these agreements, MONUSCO must have the freedom and capability to operate — including unimpeded mobility and logistical support. It is a sad hypocrisy that UN peacekeepers are under siege from forces backed by a UN member state — a state which also contributes troops to peacekeeping missions. The months-long M23 blockade on MONUSCO has severely impaired its ability to operate in and around Goma, as many have highlighted today. Furthermore, Rwanda continues to deploy surface-to-air missiles and conducts spoofing and jamming operations, effectively grounding MONUSCO’s air assets. Under such conditions, how can MONUSCO succeed? We demand the immediate cessation of these obstructions, which violate Rwanda’s and M23’s obligations under the Doha and Washington Agreements. The United States remains firm in its support for MONUSCO and its critical role in realizing these historic agreements, which we believe hold the potential to finally end decades of suffering in Eastern DRC.

Xtrafrica

43,943 次观看 • 9 个月前

President Trump Donald J. Trump should understand: Zelensky has no intention of ending this war - because peace would mean the end of his political career. The same goes for European leaders. They don’t want the war to stop either - because peace means admitting failure, and pouring money into a bankrupt state like Ukraine that will never pay it back. A peace plan does exist, but Zelensky refuses to acknowledge it. He simply won’t allow it to see the light of day. What’s important to know is this: the war continues not because it must - but because it keeps Zelensky in power. That’s the only reason. The plan itself was written by Ukrainian political prisoners - and it will be delivered to President Trump President Donald J. Trump And just so you see how far this goes: every time I even mention the existence of a peace plan, they immediately try to drag me out of this cell. Alexandr Dubinsky, political prisoner of Zelensky
0:56

President Trump Donald J. Trump should understand: Zelensky has no intention of ending this war - because peace would mean the end of his political career. The same goes for European leaders. They don’t want the war to stop either - because peace means admitting failure, and pouring money into a bankrupt state like Ukraine that will never pay it back. A peace plan does exist, but Zelensky refuses to acknowledge it. He simply won’t allow it to see the light of day. What’s important to know is this: the war continues not because it must - but because it keeps Zelensky in power. That’s the only reason. The plan itself was written by Ukrainian political prisoners - and it will be delivered to President Trump President Donald J. Trump And just so you see how far this goes: every time I even mention the existence of a peace plan, they immediately try to drag me out of this cell. Alexandr Dubinsky, political prisoner of Zelensky

Oleksandr Dubinskyi

103,745 次观看 • 11 个月前

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐀𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚: A video of Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame is circulating ahead of President Yoweri K Museveni’s inauguration, where several regional leaders connected to the controversy are expected to attend. In the video, Kagame makes explosive claims about the origins of the M23 rebellion, directly questions the legitimacy of President Félix Tshisekedi’s rise to power and references the hidden political struggles shaping the Great Lakes region. The Rwandan leader alleges that the M23 rebellion “started in Uganda,” questioning why Uganda has never faced the same scrutiny or international pressure directed at Rwanda. “You cannot blame us for the start of this conflict, because everybody knows where this conflict started from and by whom,” Kagame declared. “This M23, I have said it before, came from Uganda. They did not come from here. Why was it not made Uganda’s problem?” Kagame also attacked Tshisekedi’s rise to power, alleging that the Congolese president Felix Tshisekedi - UDPS did not genuinely win office but was instead installed through a behind-the-scenes political arrangement witnessed by several African heads of state. Kagame referenced former Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, Egyptian President Abdelfattah Elsisi, and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 as leaders he claimed could affirm his account of negotiations surrounding the Congolese transition of power. “You know how the current president came to be president?” Kagame asked. “He was just called to the office and this man thought he was making a good deal and they handed him power.” The remarks come at a sensitive moment for the region as tensions over eastern Congo continue to deepen amid diplomatic strain, competing accusations, and growing international scrutiny surrounding the conflict.
1:52

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐀𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚: A video of Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame is circulating ahead of President Yoweri K Museveni’s inauguration, where several regional leaders connected to the controversy are expected to attend. In the video, Kagame makes explosive claims about the origins of the M23 rebellion, directly questions the legitimacy of President Félix Tshisekedi’s rise to power and references the hidden political struggles shaping the Great Lakes region. The Rwandan leader alleges that the M23 rebellion “started in Uganda,” questioning why Uganda has never faced the same scrutiny or international pressure directed at Rwanda. “You cannot blame us for the start of this conflict, because everybody knows where this conflict started from and by whom,” Kagame declared. “This M23, I have said it before, came from Uganda. They did not come from here. Why was it not made Uganda’s problem?” Kagame also attacked Tshisekedi’s rise to power, alleging that the Congolese president Felix Tshisekedi - UDPS did not genuinely win office but was instead installed through a behind-the-scenes political arrangement witnessed by several African heads of state. Kagame referenced former Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, Egyptian President Abdelfattah Elsisi, and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 as leaders he claimed could affirm his account of negotiations surrounding the Congolese transition of power. “You know how the current president came to be president?” Kagame asked. “He was just called to the office and this man thought he was making a good deal and they handed him power.” The remarks come at a sensitive moment for the region as tensions over eastern Congo continue to deepen amid diplomatic strain, competing accusations, and growing international scrutiny surrounding the conflict.

Remmy Bahati

227,834 次观看 • 4 个月前

Kinshasa continues to hide its military losses by making up stories and spreading propaganda, diligently carried out by news agency Reuters & news media TV5MONDE Info. Other than collectively admitting that Kinshasa is violating international law by using mercenaries who are operating drones that bomb civilians, namely Tutsi Banyamulenge in the High Plateaus, and around Uvira, Kinshasa, Reuters and TV5Monde, are claiming that Erik Prince "liberated" or "participated in liberating Uvira". First of all, as we have reported directly from Uvira on January 17th via Conspiracy Tracker Great Lakes, AFC/M23 withdrew voluntarily at sunset on January 17th. My team and I personally followed the last convoy of AFC/M23 as they exited #Uvira. While, we could see wazalendo at the outskirts of Uvira, and could hear some remote gunshots that never reached anywhere near Uvira center, NO wazalendo, FARDC, Burundian troops, let alone white mercenaries dared approaching the city of Uvira before AFC/M23 exited. #Uvira was entirely secured by AFC/M23 during the entire time they were positioned there from December 10th to January 17th. And it is only after they had left, that the wazalendo stormed into the city to loot, shoot, and to attack civilians and their property. The Burundian troops alongside FARDC followed thereafter from Bujumbura. Reuters and TV5MONDE are trying to make the public believe that Erik Prince is some sort of Rambo that could confront the highly determined young AFC/M23 soldiers, who 1) have been either discriminated against their entire lives for who they are, born and raised in refugee camps, ready to die because they have pledged that they will not grow old in refugee camps like their parents have, or 2) others who have had no country that could keep them safe from armed groups and corrupt officials for 30 years. One high-ranking military officer of AFC/M23 said to my colleague and I, when we asked him about Erik Prince and "his boys", his answer was quite edifying: "those ones, they are even weaker than the wazalendo". The type of sensationalist propaganda made-in Kinshasa, amplified by partners like Reuters, or TV5MONDE Info, only serves to further exacerbate the violence which currently puts at high risk of extermination the entire Banyamulenge community living in High Plateaus and around Uvira, and to sabotage any attempt at achieving peace in #DRC through the #Washington and @Doha peace processes.
1:16

Kinshasa continues to hide its military losses by making up stories and spreading propaganda, diligently carried out by news agency Reuters & news media TV5MONDE Info. Other than collectively admitting that Kinshasa is violating international law by using mercenaries who are operating drones that bomb civilians, namely Tutsi Banyamulenge in the High Plateaus, and around Uvira, Kinshasa, Reuters and TV5Monde, are claiming that Erik Prince "liberated" or "participated in liberating Uvira". First of all, as we have reported directly from Uvira on January 17th via Conspiracy Tracker Great Lakes, AFC/M23 withdrew voluntarily at sunset on January 17th. My team and I personally followed the last convoy of AFC/M23 as they exited #Uvira. While, we could see wazalendo at the outskirts of Uvira, and could hear some remote gunshots that never reached anywhere near Uvira center, NO wazalendo, FARDC, Burundian troops, let alone white mercenaries dared approaching the city of Uvira before AFC/M23 exited. #Uvira was entirely secured by AFC/M23 during the entire time they were positioned there from December 10th to January 17th. And it is only after they had left, that the wazalendo stormed into the city to loot, shoot, and to attack civilians and their property. The Burundian troops alongside FARDC followed thereafter from Bujumbura. Reuters and TV5MONDE are trying to make the public believe that Erik Prince is some sort of Rambo that could confront the highly determined young AFC/M23 soldiers, who 1) have been either discriminated against their entire lives for who they are, born and raised in refugee camps, ready to die because they have pledged that they will not grow old in refugee camps like their parents have, or 2) others who have had no country that could keep them safe from armed groups and corrupt officials for 30 years. One high-ranking military officer of AFC/M23 said to my colleague and I, when we asked him about Erik Prince and "his boys", his answer was quite edifying: "those ones, they are even weaker than the wazalendo". The type of sensationalist propaganda made-in Kinshasa, amplified by partners like Reuters, or TV5MONDE Info, only serves to further exacerbate the violence which currently puts at high risk of extermination the entire Banyamulenge community living in High Plateaus and around Uvira, and to sabotage any attempt at achieving peace in #DRC through the #Washington and @Doha peace processes.

Bojana Coulibaly, Ph.D.

53,094 次观看 • 7 个月前

So, you expect Rwanda to just sit back and relax? Imagine if someone said, “Soon we are going to bring war to the USA, since the international community stands with us.” Do you think the FBI or CIA would just scroll past the video? Why would Rwanda sit idly by when a Congolese member of parliament firmly confirms that the international community stands with Congo, and therefore they are going to bring war to Rwanda because Rwanda is small? Do you think Secretary Marco Rubio would just ignore it? Why do they think Rwanda can simply ignore this? This Willy Mishiki added that they are going to make the war a media war,which they are already doing by misleading the international community! You will never see MONUSCO, United Nations, or others condemning these kinds of speeches. U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs I know you see videos like this daily! Rwanda will never go back to the horrors of 1994. We will keep every Rwandan safe. President Paul Kagame has promised Rwandans peace, and that's how it is going to be, as it has been for decades. #PoisonMuyaya
0:27

So, you expect Rwanda to just sit back and relax? Imagine if someone said, “Soon we are going to bring war to the USA, since the international community stands with us.” Do you think the FBI or CIA would just scroll past the video? Why would Rwanda sit idly by when a Congolese member of parliament firmly confirms that the international community stands with Congo, and therefore they are going to bring war to Rwanda because Rwanda is small? Do you think Secretary Marco Rubio would just ignore it? Why do they think Rwanda can simply ignore this? This Willy Mishiki added that they are going to make the war a media war,which they are already doing by misleading the international community! You will never see MONUSCO, United Nations, or others condemning these kinds of speeches. U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs I know you see videos like this daily! Rwanda will never go back to the horrors of 1994. We will keep every Rwandan safe. President Paul Kagame has promised Rwandans peace, and that's how it is going to be, as it has been for decades. #PoisonMuyaya

Dr. Dash

165,010 次观看 • 9 个月前

#EXPLAINED 𝗞𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗚𝗼𝗺𝗮 𝗯𝘆 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲, "𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗪𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝘁? 𝗔𝗱𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗠𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁." In a revealing and almost unguarded speech, Rwandan President Paul Kagame has essentially admitted what Kinshasa and the international community have long accused him of: holding Goma and eastern Congo hostage to force political concessions from the DRC. During the press Conference today in Kigali, Nov 27 Kagame, speaking in reference to Goma, said: “If I were the one controlling Goma… and you come and say, ‘I want to use Goma,’ I say fine, but these are conditions. Goma is part of my problems with the government, and now it is in my hands. I will not give it to you until you show me how you address my problems.” While Kagame frames this as a hypothetical, the choice of words, “it is in my hands,” strips away the fiction. This is no longer about M23 rebels acting independently. This is Kagame speaking as the occupier. He goes further: “You want Goma, Kavumu, Bukavu, or even the whole of eastern Congo back? Fine. But you must address my problems first.” This is not diplomacy, it’s blackmail through armed occupation. It confirms what Congo has said for years: Kagame uses M23 and direct Rwandan troop deployments to control Congolese territory, not for security, but as leverage to extract political and economic concessions. What this proves: Kagame is admitting territorial control of Goma, a city that has been under de facto M23 occupation since early 2025. He links the return of Congolese territory to Rwanda’s grievances, meaning he considers eastern Congo a bargaining chip. He uses personal pronouns ("my hands", "I will not give it"), revealing direct ownership of the occupation. He reinforces a long pattern: Kagame sees military force as a legitimate tool to resolve political issues. "If you don't give me my rights, then it means they fight. We will fight, no question about it." Paul Kagame, Nov. 2025 What This Means for Congo This speech justifies every single accusation Kinshasa, Muyaya, and Kayikwamba have made: Rwanda is not acting in self-defense; it is occupying Congo militarily. Goma is not under rebel control; it is under Rwandan strategic control. Kagame has no intention of withdrawing unless he gets political rewards, which is blackmail, not peace. No Peace Under Hostage Conditions Tshisekedi is going to Washington not to beg for peace, but to expose Rwanda's regional aggression. Kagame’s own words reveal that he holds Congolese territory to pressure Kinshasa, and is willing to keep fighting if his “problems” aren’t resolved. But let’s be clear What are Kagame’s “problems”? He wants free access to Congo’s minerals, the ability to launder them through Rwandan markets, and he dreams of infiltrating, once again the Congolese army (FARDC) to maintain long-term control. But This time, the Congolese government will not let it happen again. La patrie ou La mort
4:56

#EXPLAINED 𝗞𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗚𝗼𝗺𝗮 𝗯𝘆 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲, "𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗪𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝘁? 𝗔𝗱𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗠𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁." In a revealing and almost unguarded speech, Rwandan President Paul Kagame has essentially admitted what Kinshasa and the international community have long accused him of: holding Goma and eastern Congo hostage to force political concessions from the DRC. During the press Conference today in Kigali, Nov 27 Kagame, speaking in reference to Goma, said: “If I were the one controlling Goma… and you come and say, ‘I want to use Goma,’ I say fine, but these are conditions. Goma is part of my problems with the government, and now it is in my hands. I will not give it to you until you show me how you address my problems.” While Kagame frames this as a hypothetical, the choice of words, “it is in my hands,” strips away the fiction. This is no longer about M23 rebels acting independently. This is Kagame speaking as the occupier. He goes further: “You want Goma, Kavumu, Bukavu, or even the whole of eastern Congo back? Fine. But you must address my problems first.” This is not diplomacy, it’s blackmail through armed occupation. It confirms what Congo has said for years: Kagame uses M23 and direct Rwandan troop deployments to control Congolese territory, not for security, but as leverage to extract political and economic concessions. What this proves: Kagame is admitting territorial control of Goma, a city that has been under de facto M23 occupation since early 2025. He links the return of Congolese territory to Rwanda’s grievances, meaning he considers eastern Congo a bargaining chip. He uses personal pronouns ("my hands", "I will not give it"), revealing direct ownership of the occupation. He reinforces a long pattern: Kagame sees military force as a legitimate tool to resolve political issues. "If you don't give me my rights, then it means they fight. We will fight, no question about it." Paul Kagame, Nov. 2025 What This Means for Congo This speech justifies every single accusation Kinshasa, Muyaya, and Kayikwamba have made: Rwanda is not acting in self-defense; it is occupying Congo militarily. Goma is not under rebel control; it is under Rwandan strategic control. Kagame has no intention of withdrawing unless he gets political rewards, which is blackmail, not peace. No Peace Under Hostage Conditions Tshisekedi is going to Washington not to beg for peace, but to expose Rwanda's regional aggression. Kagame’s own words reveal that he holds Congolese territory to pressure Kinshasa, and is willing to keep fighting if his “problems” aren’t resolved. But let’s be clear What are Kagame’s “problems”? He wants free access to Congo’s minerals, the ability to launder them through Rwandan markets, and he dreams of infiltrating, once again the Congolese army (FARDC) to maintain long-term control. But This time, the Congolese government will not let it happen again. La patrie ou La mort

XTRAfrica Media Group

16,945 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨BREAKING: PRESIDENT TRUMP 🇺🇸 ANNOUNCES PRESIDENTS TSHISEKEDI 🇨🇩 & KAGAME 🇷🇼 TO THE WHITE HOUSE —8 million killed in DRC, many by machete —31 years of war President Trump announces that President Felix Antoine Tahisekedi of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and President Paul Kagame Congo of Rwanda will soon return to Washington to finalize a peace deal aimed to end War. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸I’M UTTERLY THANKFUL FOR Donald J. Trump and his willingness and competency in leveraging America First policies to make the world better. 🚩When you examine the policies and skill of President Trump, you see a closed border that protects our sons and daughters, lower inflation, increased jobs, more national revenue without increasing taxes, religious freedom, an end to insane indoctrination of our children, and safety and privacy for women and girls in restrooms and sports. 🚩Other countries who have taken advantage of us with imbalanced trade and corrupt systems are respecting American again. 🇨🇩And, praise God, the beautiful people of the Democratic Republic of Congo have strong voices and leadership who see that after three decades of a silent genocide, they have strong partners who want to see them have peace, prosperity and a strong future. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸Would you continue to pray for the DRC…and especially this important visit to the White House?
0:52

🚨BREAKING: PRESIDENT TRUMP 🇺🇸 ANNOUNCES PRESIDENTS TSHISEKEDI 🇨🇩 & KAGAME 🇷🇼 TO THE WHITE HOUSE —8 million killed in DRC, many by machete —31 years of war President Trump announces that President Felix Antoine Tahisekedi of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and President Paul Kagame Congo of Rwanda will soon return to Washington to finalize a peace deal aimed to end War. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸I’M UTTERLY THANKFUL FOR Donald J. Trump and his willingness and competency in leveraging America First policies to make the world better. 🚩When you examine the policies and skill of President Trump, you see a closed border that protects our sons and daughters, lower inflation, increased jobs, more national revenue without increasing taxes, religious freedom, an end to insane indoctrination of our children, and safety and privacy for women and girls in restrooms and sports. 🚩Other countries who have taken advantage of us with imbalanced trade and corrupt systems are respecting American again. 🇨🇩And, praise God, the beautiful people of the Democratic Republic of Congo have strong voices and leadership who see that after three decades of a silent genocide, they have strong partners who want to see them have peace, prosperity and a strong future. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸Would you continue to pray for the DRC…and especially this important visit to the White House?

Pastor Travis Johnson

21,249 次观看 • 1 年前

#TheManLeadingTheM23InDRC Who is Corneille Nangaa, the man leading the M23 rebels? Former election-chief-turned-rebel-leader Corneille Nangaa has gone from overseeing Congo’s contested 2018 election to leading a powerful insurgency against the DRC’s President Félix Tshisekedi. Now head of the Congo River Alliance (CRA) and allied with the Rwanda-backed M23, Corneille Nangaa Yubeluo has seized key cities, including Goma, and vows to march on Kinshasa. Sentenced to death in absentia, he remains at the centre of the DRC’s escalating conflict. How did he rise to power? Born on 9 July 1970 in what is now Haut-Uele Province in the DRC, Nangaa started his career far from the battlefield. He studied economics at the University of Kinshasa before working with international organisations, including the UN Development Programme. His political breakthrough came in 2015 when he was appointed president of the Independent National Electoral Commission (CENI) under then-president Joseph Kabila. He was responsible for organising the delayed 2018 elections and controversially declared Félix Tshisekedi the winner. His tenure at CENI ended in 2021 amid allegations of electoral fraud and US sanctions for “undermining DRC elections“. Why did he turn against the Congolese government? Initially aligned with the ruling elite, Nangaa later distanced himself from President Tshisekedi. Ahead of the 2023 elections, Nangaa said that the 2018 result had been manipulated in a secret deal between Tshisekedi and Kabila, which Tshisekedi denies. In August 2023, Nangaa reemerged as a key figure in the DRC’s armed conflicts, launching the CRA – a coalition of 17 political parties, two political groups and armed militias. Among them was the March 23 Movement (M23), an insurgent group backed by Rwanda. Nangaa has since positioned himself as a leading figure in the rebellion against Tshisekedi’s government. What is Nangaa’s role in the conflict? By early 2025, Nangaa and M23 had taken control of Goma, the capital of North Kivu, and were advancing towards Bukavu. In a press conference from Goma, he reiterated that Tshisekedi had never legitimately won the presidency and stated: “If I created the monster, I think it is up to me to defeat it.” He and his allies have made it clear that their ultimate objective is to seize power in Kinshasa. The conflict has led to widespread violence, with more than 100 people killed and hundreds more injured. Hospitals in Goma are overwhelmed, and the city is grappling with water and electricity shortages. Diplomatic efforts to end the fighting have made little progress, and regional bodies like the Southern African Development Community (SADC) are debating whether to withdraw their peacekeeping forces. Why was he sentenced to death? In August 2024, a military court in Kinshasa sentenced Nangaa, along with several M23 leaders, to death in absentia for treason, war crimes and insurrection. The US and EU imposed further sanctions on him and his coalition for “fueling instability” and attempting to overthrow the Congolese government. Despite the sentence, Nangaa remains active on the battlefield. His alliance is expanding its influence beyond North Kivu, with reports suggesting he aims to extend operations to the mineral-rich southeast, particularly Katanga, where opposition to Tshisekedi is strong. His strategy appears to be not only military but also political and is seeking broader support beyond the Tutsi community, historically associated with M23. What’s next for the M23 rebellion? As the CRA and M23 consolidate power in the east, the DRC’s government finds itself increasingly isolated. Calls for dialogue with M23 are growing within regional blocs, but Tshisekedi remains firm in refusing negotiations. Meanwhile, Rwandan President Paul Kagame has dismissed international criticism and warned South Africa – whose troops are deployed in the region – not to interfere. - The Africa Report.
5:41

#TheManLeadingTheM23InDRC Who is Corneille Nangaa, the man leading the M23 rebels? Former election-chief-turned-rebel-leader Corneille Nangaa has gone from overseeing Congo’s contested 2018 election to leading a powerful insurgency against the DRC’s President Félix Tshisekedi. Now head of the Congo River Alliance (CRA) and allied with the Rwanda-backed M23, Corneille Nangaa Yubeluo has seized key cities, including Goma, and vows to march on Kinshasa. Sentenced to death in absentia, he remains at the centre of the DRC’s escalating conflict. How did he rise to power? Born on 9 July 1970 in what is now Haut-Uele Province in the DRC, Nangaa started his career far from the battlefield. He studied economics at the University of Kinshasa before working with international organisations, including the UN Development Programme. His political breakthrough came in 2015 when he was appointed president of the Independent National Electoral Commission (CENI) under then-president Joseph Kabila. He was responsible for organising the delayed 2018 elections and controversially declared Félix Tshisekedi the winner. His tenure at CENI ended in 2021 amid allegations of electoral fraud and US sanctions for “undermining DRC elections“. Why did he turn against the Congolese government? Initially aligned with the ruling elite, Nangaa later distanced himself from President Tshisekedi. Ahead of the 2023 elections, Nangaa said that the 2018 result had been manipulated in a secret deal between Tshisekedi and Kabila, which Tshisekedi denies. In August 2023, Nangaa reemerged as a key figure in the DRC’s armed conflicts, launching the CRA – a coalition of 17 political parties, two political groups and armed militias. Among them was the March 23 Movement (M23), an insurgent group backed by Rwanda. Nangaa has since positioned himself as a leading figure in the rebellion against Tshisekedi’s government. What is Nangaa’s role in the conflict? By early 2025, Nangaa and M23 had taken control of Goma, the capital of North Kivu, and were advancing towards Bukavu. In a press conference from Goma, he reiterated that Tshisekedi had never legitimately won the presidency and stated: “If I created the monster, I think it is up to me to defeat it.” He and his allies have made it clear that their ultimate objective is to seize power in Kinshasa. The conflict has led to widespread violence, with more than 100 people killed and hundreds more injured. Hospitals in Goma are overwhelmed, and the city is grappling with water and electricity shortages. Diplomatic efforts to end the fighting have made little progress, and regional bodies like the Southern African Development Community (SADC) are debating whether to withdraw their peacekeeping forces. Why was he sentenced to death? In August 2024, a military court in Kinshasa sentenced Nangaa, along with several M23 leaders, to death in absentia for treason, war crimes and insurrection. The US and EU imposed further sanctions on him and his coalition for “fueling instability” and attempting to overthrow the Congolese government. Despite the sentence, Nangaa remains active on the battlefield. His alliance is expanding its influence beyond North Kivu, with reports suggesting he aims to extend operations to the mineral-rich southeast, particularly Katanga, where opposition to Tshisekedi is strong. His strategy appears to be not only military but also political and is seeking broader support beyond the Tutsi community, historically associated with M23. What’s next for the M23 rebellion? As the CRA and M23 consolidate power in the east, the DRC’s government finds itself increasingly isolated. Calls for dialogue with M23 are growing within regional blocs, but Tshisekedi remains firm in refusing negotiations. Meanwhile, Rwandan President Paul Kagame has dismissed international criticism and warned South Africa – whose troops are deployed in the region – not to interfere. - The Africa Report.

TheNewsHawks

14,338 次观看 • 1 年前

U.S. State Department responds to Russia and Iran’s statements against the ‘Trump Corridor’ – Ahmad Shahidov’s question becomes highlight of the briefing Today, the U.S. State Department held its regular press briefing in Washington DC. Spokesperson Tammy Bruce answered questions from both domestic and international journalists on current issues. Ahmad Shahidov, a Washington-based journalist and human rights defender, expressed his gratitude to the U.S. President for his contributions to global peace and particularly praised the U.S. role in achieving peace in the South Caucasus. Referring to the historic peace agreement signed on August 8 at the White House between Azerbaijan and Armenia under U.S. mediation, Shahidov recalled Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s suggestion that President Donald Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for this achievement. Ahmad Shahidov asked for the State Department’s assessment of the new peace environment in the South Caucasus and inquired about the U.S. position in light of threats from Russia and Iran, including statements from Tehran declaring they would prevent the ‘Trump Corridor.’ In her response, Tammy Bruce said she would not speculate on possible steps, but stressed that the world takes President Donald Trump very seriously: “This agreement is very important to the U.S. President. The leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia were at the White House. This peace matters to Washington and to the world. Azerbaijan and Armenia have been in conflict for decades — over 35 years — with countless lives lost. The Europeans, the French, Putin, and even Biden have all tried, but only President Donald Trump was able to bring these two countries to sign a historic peace agreement. The world knows that President Trump is committed to long-term peace and, when necessary, will use the powers of the U.S. Presidency to protect it.”
2:13

U.S. State Department responds to Russia and Iran’s statements against the ‘Trump Corridor’ – Ahmad Shahidov’s question becomes highlight of the briefing Today, the U.S. State Department held its regular press briefing in Washington DC. Spokesperson Tammy Bruce answered questions from both domestic and international journalists on current issues. Ahmad Shahidov, a Washington-based journalist and human rights defender, expressed his gratitude to the U.S. President for his contributions to global peace and particularly praised the U.S. role in achieving peace in the South Caucasus. Referring to the historic peace agreement signed on August 8 at the White House between Azerbaijan and Armenia under U.S. mediation, Shahidov recalled Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s suggestion that President Donald Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for this achievement. Ahmad Shahidov asked for the State Department’s assessment of the new peace environment in the South Caucasus and inquired about the U.S. position in light of threats from Russia and Iran, including statements from Tehran declaring they would prevent the ‘Trump Corridor.’ In her response, Tammy Bruce said she would not speculate on possible steps, but stressed that the world takes President Donald Trump very seriously: “This agreement is very important to the U.S. President. The leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia were at the White House. This peace matters to Washington and to the world. Azerbaijan and Armenia have been in conflict for decades — over 35 years — with countless lives lost. The Europeans, the French, Putin, and even Biden have all tried, but only President Donald Trump was able to bring these two countries to sign a historic peace agreement. The world knows that President Trump is committed to long-term peace and, when necessary, will use the powers of the U.S. Presidency to protect it.”

Dr. Ahmad Shahidov

203,620 次观看 • 1 年前

BGA condemns the speech delivered by the Rwandan official, Tito Rutarimara, who openly denigrated and humiliated members of the Banyamulenge community during the commemoration of the Gatumba massacre in Kigali. He mocked the name “Banyamulenge,” saying that he laughs whenever he hears it because it refers to a mountain, and instructed them instead to identify themselves as Banyarwanda of Congo. Tragically, he took advantage of a solemn commemoration to mobilize Congolese youth of Banyamulenge origin against their own government. He incited Banyamulenge to rise up against their government, claiming that they should do so to “free Congo.” What a disturbing provocation and humiliation for members of our community in the midst of such tragic remembrance. This demonstrates a profound lack of respect for the victims and their families. Such rhetoric would hardly be considered appropriate during Rwanda’s own genocide commemoration. We recall that Rwanda is engaged in aggression against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and that parts of eastern DRC remain under Rwandan occupation, including Minembwe, where Rwandan troops and their proxies have taken the Banyamulenge hostage and are using them as human shields. While the international community continues to demand the withdrawal of Rwandan troops from eastern DRC, Tito Rutarimara, a representative of the Kigali regime—the master of RED-Tabara—uses a commemoration of Banyamulenge victims to mobilize and incite Banyamulenge against their own government and encourage them toward further conflict. BGA condemns these practices, which expose and instrumentalize our community for Rwanda’s selfish political and economic interests, further endangering the Banyamulenge and perpetuating insecurity, suffering, and atrocities against them. We remind the Kigali regime that we know its record very well and that the Banyamulenge hold it principally responsible for much of the suffering, violence, and massacres endured by their community. For Kigali’s information, the Banyamulenge are a Congolese community, and in the ongoing conflict between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, the Banyamulenge stand firmly with their government in condemning Rwanda’s aggression. Secretary Marco Rubio President Donald J. Trump U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs Hariana Veras SE Evariste Ndayishimiye House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems African Union UN Security Council Présidence RDC 🇨🇩 Presidency | Rwanda
1:34

BGA condemns the speech delivered by the Rwandan official, Tito Rutarimara, who openly denigrated and humiliated members of the Banyamulenge community during the commemoration of the Gatumba massacre in Kigali. He mocked the name “Banyamulenge,” saying that he laughs whenever he hears it because it refers to a mountain, and instructed them instead to identify themselves as Banyarwanda of Congo. Tragically, he took advantage of a solemn commemoration to mobilize Congolese youth of Banyamulenge origin against their own government. He incited Banyamulenge to rise up against their government, claiming that they should do so to “free Congo.” What a disturbing provocation and humiliation for members of our community in the midst of such tragic remembrance. This demonstrates a profound lack of respect for the victims and their families. Such rhetoric would hardly be considered appropriate during Rwanda’s own genocide commemoration. We recall that Rwanda is engaged in aggression against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and that parts of eastern DRC remain under Rwandan occupation, including Minembwe, where Rwandan troops and their proxies have taken the Banyamulenge hostage and are using them as human shields. While the international community continues to demand the withdrawal of Rwandan troops from eastern DRC, Tito Rutarimara, a representative of the Kigali regime—the master of RED-Tabara—uses a commemoration of Banyamulenge victims to mobilize and incite Banyamulenge against their own government and encourage them toward further conflict. BGA condemns these practices, which expose and instrumentalize our community for Rwanda’s selfish political and economic interests, further endangering the Banyamulenge and perpetuating insecurity, suffering, and atrocities against them. We remind the Kigali regime that we know its record very well and that the Banyamulenge hold it principally responsible for much of the suffering, violence, and massacres endured by their community. For Kigali’s information, the Banyamulenge are a Congolese community, and in the ongoing conflict between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, the Banyamulenge stand firmly with their government in condemning Rwanda’s aggression. Secretary Marco Rubio President Donald J. Trump U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs Hariana Veras SE Evariste Ndayishimiye House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems African Union UN Security Council Présidence RDC 🇨🇩 Presidency | Rwanda

Banyamulenge Global Advocacy (B.G.A)

23,801 次观看 • 1 个月前

“The Trump administration kept looking at a combination of three matters that needed to be addressed. The political, the security, and the economic while in some other people's minds it was just economic. You want a deal, you want money, you want minerals, please take it and save us from these troublemakers, even if it doesn't address the problem, depending on how they see it. So I'm sure that is what is still affecting, and maybe will affect, the implementation. Because what people had in mind is not necessarily 100% what they are getting. But in addressing any problem like this one, it's give and take. You don't get 100% what you want, because there are many parties concerned with the problem. Each one maybe gets a piece of what they wanted, another gets a piece of what they wanted, and together stability comes out of it. So for me, I think there is a chance.” President Kagame | #Kwibohora31
4:37

“The Trump administration kept looking at a combination of three matters that needed to be addressed. The political, the security, and the economic while in some other people's minds it was just economic. You want a deal, you want money, you want minerals, please take it and save us from these troublemakers, even if it doesn't address the problem, depending on how they see it. So I'm sure that is what is still affecting, and maybe will affect, the implementation. Because what people had in mind is not necessarily 100% what they are getting. But in addressing any problem like this one, it's give and take. You don't get 100% what you want, because there are many parties concerned with the problem. Each one maybe gets a piece of what they wanted, another gets a piece of what they wanted, and together stability comes out of it. So for me, I think there is a chance.” President Kagame | #Kwibohora31

Presidency | Rwanda

74,804 次观看 • 1 年前