Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Private BECA BARBIE ✨️💓✨️ ignored one too many orders, and Sergeant ANGELA WHITE is officially done being patient. When basic discipline fails, she calls in HA HA HA to help complete the mission 🫡🔥 WATCH NOW ➡️

536,451 просмотров • 25 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 The blonde hippie chick with dreads is now claiming to be a channeler for the Galactic Federation "These are codes from a Lyran Queen who is a part of the Galatic Federation Council. She’s been communicating with me for over 10 years now. I have always been so afraid to share this side of myself it took a lot for me to record this, but have felt so affirmed by the amount of people who also believe and confirm everything I’ve been told. The truth is coming out faster and faster every day about our world and our history we have been separated from our galactic family for far too long and we are finally reaching a frequency to be able to see/feel/uncover the truth that has been kept hidden from us & remember who we are. I had the most incredible moment with light language a few days ago, where my dear friend and I who have been working with translating stones and working with the magic of light language came to a moment where we realized we can actually activate others light language by speaking light language over them and speaking to their guides to help unlock this for them and wlwhat we experienced was so incredibly beautiful. We watched our other dear friends light language awaken inside of her! It was straight out of a dream and we were both being shown how when one person activates, it lights up thousands around them and I’m realizing more and more that people are opening up to this realm that I have felt so tapped into for most of my life that made me feel crazy but in reality all I’m seeing is more people tapping into the same realm and I have personally experienced so many miracles from using light language ranging from healing myself to witnessing other people heal people to healing my family members and shifting matter. I’m feeling more than ever so grateful and excited to share the deeper side of myself that I kept off social media I mean, obviously I’ve always been weird, but I’m even more weird than you guys even know ha ha ha ha ha ha so it’s about to get weirder, but the people who get it get it and the people who don’t will eventually get it but for now I’m here to help awaken the masses. " - Shanin Blake

Red Panda Koala

171,113 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

BREAKING: $NRED Is Nearly 3 times the Size of ~2.7x Manhattan, NY Island (near 160.78 km² ) let me explain, its so big, its top 10 global mega project!!! How I missed it... i was busy with nonsense ! But no i see! RED Pill only 🍎 16,077.76 hectares. 160.78 km². ~39,730 acres. ~2.7x Manhattan,NY Island. ~30,000 football fields. NovaRed Mining’s Wilmac Copper-Gold Project in British Columbia is no small land package. It is now big enough to enter the global copper land-scale conversation. The project sits in the Quesnel porphyry belt, roughly 10 km west of Copper Mountain Mine. (TMX Newsfile) Top 10 copper land-scale comparison board: Escondida — Chile — ~406,000 ha Antamina — Peru — ~105,000 ha Buenavista — Mexico — ~89,000 ha Cerro Verde — Peru — ~71,000 ha Kamoa-Kakula — DRC — ~40,000 ha Collahuasi — Chile — ~16,700 ha NRED Wilmac — Canada — 16,078 ha Grasberg Block A — Indonesia — ~11,000 ha Copper Mountain — Canada — ~6,263 ha Zaldívar — Chile — ~1,300 ha This is a land-size comparison only — not a reserve, grade, production, valuation, or mine-status ranking. That matters because Wilmac is still exploration-stage. Zero copper produced. No proven mine yet. But by land size, the scale is already serious. Now add the AI layer. NovaRed’s AI mineral exploration platform is designed to integrate multi-source geological data, probabilistic scoring, and document verification into one exploration intelligence system. (TMX Newsfile) That platform vision could go far beyond Wilmac. There are roughly 77 million U.S. landowners controlling about 1.3 billion acres of private land — most of it never analyzed with modern AI-driven mineral discovery tools. (National Land Realty) Now add copper demand from AI data centers, EVs, robotics, power grids, transformers, defense systems, and electrification. Now add Canada’s sulfur position. Alberta alone produces about 4 million tonnes of sulfur per year, and sulfuric acid is a key reagent in many copper leaching processes. (University of Alberta) Now add North Lamont. 43 soil samples. Copper values up to 379 ppm Cu. Nine samples over 150 ppm Cu in one cluster. Moderate-priority drill target. 2026 geophysical work in progress. (TMX Newsfile) This is not just a junior mining story. This is land scale + copper + AI + data + Canadian critical-mineral infrastructure. A potential mega-project in action. Add $NRED to your watch list. Source anchors for your research: NovaRed’s May 1 release states the Wilmac expansion to 16,077.76 hectares, while the May 11 North Lamont release describes the 43-sample program, copper values up to 379 ppm Cu, the Quesnel porphyry belt location, and proximity to Copper Mountain. NovaRed’s AI patent filing describes multi-source geological data integration, probabilistic scoring, and verification tools. The U.S. landowner figure comes from National Land Realty’s estimate of about 77 million owners and 1.3 billion acres of private land. Sulfur production and copper-leaching context are supported by USGS and copper-processing sources. Land-scale comparison figures are based on reported technical/company sources for Escondida, Antamina, Buenavista, Cerro Verde, Oyu Tolgoi, Kamoa-Kakula, Collahuasi, Grasberg, and Copper Mountain. Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. $NRED / $NREDF is a highly speculative junior exploration company involving significant risk, including possible loss of capital. Always do your own research, read company filings, and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions. $NVDA $TSLA $PLTR $AMD $SMCI $IONQ $QBTS $RGTI $QUBT $SMR $RKLB $LUNR $CCJ $NRED $NREDF

Victor Renard

5,330,211 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

DEEP THOUGHTS from Scott Adams and Naval on Singularity Theory and the nature of consciousness. Naval: I try not to go too much in the supernatural, but I'll be honest, there are times when I've prayed. (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) Scott: Can't hurt! Naval: Nobody's perfect! Yeah, exactly. Pascal's wager, right? Just in case! Scott: Yeah, I've got a version of this. I don't know if I've ever said this out loud before, but every now and then I just talk to the creators of The Simulation that are watching me -- because it might be me . . . . Naval: Yeah, exactly! No, I completely agree. Yes, if simulation hypothesis is true, then, you know, God or creator or master programmer has your best interest at heart. Scott: I say things like, you know: "Is this the plan? I mean, are you really going to do this thing?" Naval: Exactly. Exactly. No, yeah. Like, “don't take me out of the game too fast.” Like, “you need some resource if you want me to be effective, right?” Or like, “I'm not Job. Don't try me. I'll fail.” (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) “Let's not go through. Let's not take that route. Let's try a different one.” Yeah, I think everybody does that. Because at the end of the day, existence itself is an unexplained miracle! Like how did we get here? Why am I here? Why am I a monkey? Why am I three dimensional? Why am I male? Why am I talking to you right now? What does it even mean to talk, right? The whole thing is so surreal that there is an instantaneous and overarching miracle of just consciousness. Like why even be conscious? Why not just be like zombies or robots talking to each other, going through the same actions? Why even be aware? So, there's so much here that you just have to take axiomatically -- and that is spirituality. And I think your spirituality, your current religion, is a Simulation Hypothesis. It's perfectly valid, you know. Mine is probably closer to the Tao and, you know, other people's Christianity or whatever, but somehow, you have to explain this miracle of existence. And everyone has to do it in their own frame. But the rest is science, right? The rest is all -- follows the rules of science. And so, what I don't like is when like someone says: “This one, I'm correct, it's scientific, you should believe it because of these following arguments.” And then I'm like: “Okay, well, what are the implications? How do we test it?” If you want me to believe in the real world, it has to be scientific, which means it has to be testable. There's a third category that I will accept, which is direct experience, but it's only valid for you. So, if you have a direct experience of something, you can hold it, but your ability to convey it is zero, because everybody has their own experience and you can't take anybody else's experience at value. Scott: I'll give you that. I'm gonna give you that my personal experience is so bizarre that -- I mean, it's not, I don't think it's quite Elon Musk level, but I mean, you've got your own life that's kind of, doesn't match. Naval: Yeah, very surreal. Yeah. Scott: I mean, how do the three of us exist? Is this really – like, there's so many things in my life that happened, and I'm sure you have the same feeling, where you just say, how is this real? I mean, just how is this real? Naval: If you want to talk absolute truth, and nothing else, the only statement that you can make that is absolutely true is that – what’s that? Go ahead. Scott: I know where this is going. Naval: Sorry. What's yours? Scott: It's that we exist. To ask the question. That's the only thing you know. Naval: It's actually even worse than that! (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) I used to say it was I exist and then a very smart friend of mine corrected me and he said, no, awareness exists. You don't even know that you exist. Your thought, like yes, your current thought exists and you're aware of that current thought, but what is the you that is having that thought? That's the whole Buddhist question, the whole enlightenment question. Is there a persistent self-identity other than just thoughts that are referring to each other? Like when you look for yourself, you're not actually there. There's an awareness. The awareness exists, but the you separate from that awareness, does that even exist? Full transcript of podcast (excerpt begins at 54:33): Full video:

ScottAdamsVids

104,969 просмотров • 1 год назад