Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Professor David Clements explains the Supreme Court's Slaughter decision — the ruling that may be Trump's secret weapon for securing elections. CLEMENTS: "For the past 70 years, presidents have been curbed from firing independent government agencies unless there is a for-cause reason." But under this holding, the Court found... show more

The David Rutherford Show

5,093 subscribers

57,357 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a legal case that could vastly expand presidential powers. At stake are 90 years of precedent that have kept presidents from being able to remove members of independent government agencies. @IAmAmnaNawaz speaks to Amy Howe for more.

The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a legal case that could vastly expand presidential powers. At stake are 90 years of precedent that have kept presidents from being able to remove members of independent government agencies. @IAmAmnaNawaz speaks to Amy Howe for more.

PBS News

31,883 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Prof. David Clements on Trump's grand strategy. "I think what Trump is doing strategically is he is saving the most difficult issues to expose and educate the public for last." "There is a kind of unspoken club of elite bankers, financiers. And they are truly the enemy because you got to have the money to make the rigged election architecture go. And so what Trump has done is he's actually way ahead of what people think." "Trump said, okay, wait a minute. Why does the Lloyd's of London have anything to say about ensuring our vessels, when it's the US Navy that's responsible for their safe passage?" "So he took that off the table. And I think we finally hit the point where gas prices are coming down, because he has defeated Lloyd's of London. And so from a transnational, you know, syndicate from a from a real life specter standpoint, it's so easy now to connect the dots with elections." David Rutherford David Clements

Prof. David Clements on Trump's grand strategy. "I think what Trump is doing strategically is he is saving the most difficult issues to expose and educate the public for last." "There is a kind of unspoken club of elite bankers, financiers. And they are truly the enemy because you got to have the money to make the rigged election architecture go. And so what Trump has done is he's actually way ahead of what people think." "Trump said, okay, wait a minute. Why does the Lloyd's of London have anything to say about ensuring our vessels, when it's the US Navy that's responsible for their safe passage?" "So he took that off the table. And I think we finally hit the point where gas prices are coming down, because he has defeated Lloyd's of London. And so from a transnational, you know, syndicate from a from a real life specter standpoint, it's so easy now to connect the dots with elections." David Rutherford David Clements

The David Rutherford Show

48,152 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a legal case that could vastly expand presidential powers. At stake are 90 years of precedent that have kept presidents from being able to remove members of independent government agencies. News Hour’s Supreme Court analyst Amy Howe, co-founder of SCOTUSblog, joins @IAmAmnaNawaz to discuss.

The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a legal case that could vastly expand presidential powers. At stake are 90 years of precedent that have kept presidents from being able to remove members of independent government agencies. News Hour’s Supreme Court analyst Amy Howe, co-founder of SCOTUSblog, joins @IAmAmnaNawaz to discuss.

PBS News

24,743 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

President Trump said “I don’t think so” when asked if more firings are expected after the Supreme Court overturned a 90-year-old decision that allowed Congress to shield members of certain independent agencies from being fired by the president at will. “It gives a president the right to do what the president should have the right to do,” Trump said. The decision from the high court expands the president's power over many independent boards and commissions, which Congress had insulated from political pressure by saying their members could only be removed by the president for cause.

President Trump said “I don’t think so” when asked if more firings are expected after the Supreme Court overturned a 90-year-old decision that allowed Congress to shield members of certain independent agencies from being fired by the president at will. “It gives a president the right to do what the president should have the right to do,” Trump said. The decision from the high court expands the president's power over many independent boards and commissions, which Congress had insulated from political pressure by saying their members could only be removed by the president for cause.

CBS News

88,028 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 NOW: President Trump says the Supreme Court UPHELD his executive authority to fire Democrat FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter — a monumental solidification of executive authority letting him PURGE government agencies as he sees fit 90 year precedent OVERTURNED! 🔥 "BIG WIN at the Supreme Court, in the Slaughter Case, confirming Presidential Power in our Country to remove Executive Branch Officers and Agency Appointees, or Representatives, under Article II. This Decision was long sought by United States Presidents, dating all the way back to the 1930s. It is such an Honor to be the sitting President who won this Historic and Unprecedented Ruling, one of the most important ever given with respect to Presidential Powers. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" "To show the importance of the Slaughter Case, 90 years of precedent has been COMPLETELY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY OVERRULED, greatly increasing Presidential Power at a time when it is most needed!"

🚨 NOW: President Trump says the Supreme Court UPHELD his executive authority to fire Democrat FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter — a monumental solidification of executive authority letting him PURGE government agencies as he sees fit 90 year precedent OVERTURNED! 🔥 "BIG WIN at the Supreme Court, in the Slaughter Case, confirming Presidential Power in our Country to remove Executive Branch Officers and Agency Appointees, or Representatives, under Article II. This Decision was long sought by United States Presidents, dating all the way back to the 1930s. It is such an Honor to be the sitting President who won this Historic and Unprecedented Ruling, one of the most important ever given with respect to Presidential Powers. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" "To show the importance of the Slaughter Case, 90 years of precedent has been COMPLETELY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY OVERRULED, greatly increasing Presidential Power at a time when it is most needed!"

Eric Daugherty

64,288 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

'This is a big defeat for Donald Trump.' The Supreme Court has ruled against Trump's executive order to limit birthright citizenship in the U.S. Sky's David Blevins explains ⬇️

'This is a big defeat for Donald Trump.' The Supreme Court has ruled against Trump's executive order to limit birthright citizenship in the U.S. Sky's David Blevins explains ⬇️

Sky News

33,671 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Johnson: I have no intention of getting in the way of President Trump and his administration. He has used the tariff power that he has under Article II. He has not exceeded his authority. There is no reason for the Article I branch to intervene.

Johnson: I have no intention of getting in the way of President Trump and his administration. He has used the tariff power that he has under Article II. He has not exceeded his authority. There is no reason for the Article I branch to intervene.

Acyn

1,142,461 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Humphrey’s Executor has been Slaughtered! Over the last 15 years, the Court has steadily chipped away at that 90-year-old case that blessed for-cause removal protections for the heads of so-called “independent” agencies. Trump v. Slaughter is the logical culmination of that line—a ruling that lets the president remove those officials because, after all, the Constitution vests all executive power in the president, including being able to decide who exercises power in his name. This decision isn’t a gift to President Trump or those who succeed him, but a restoration of constitutional order. Congress can create executive-branch agencies and specify their authority, but it can’t create new branches of government unanswerable to anyone. Putting the FTC and other alphabet agencies back under presidential control doesn’t make the chief executive omnipotent; it makes the bureaucrats answerable to someone who’s answerable to the voters. At base, Trump v. Slaughter asks whether the people we elect to govern us get to do so—or whether appointed commissioners and their staffers can run the country on autopilot. In a republic, the buck should stop with the president, not assorted boards of “independent” mandarins. The Federal Reserve is an exception, however, because it’s never been considered an executive-branch agency and concerns about political interference in monetary policy go back to the Founding. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Gorsuch, is thus correct in his dissent in Trump v. Cook, that this “emergency” application for stay should’ve been granted or denied back in the fall, but instead we have an unsatisfying resolution that doesn’t resolve much and just sends the factual determination of whether Lisa Cook was properly fired “for cause” back where it should’ve been all along, in the district court. This all would’ve been resolved much sooner has the Supreme Court not insisted on full briefing, argument, and months of deliberation on what is correctly now known as the “interim-relief docket.”

Humphrey’s Executor has been Slaughtered! Over the last 15 years, the Court has steadily chipped away at that 90-year-old case that blessed for-cause removal protections for the heads of so-called “independent” agencies. Trump v. Slaughter is the logical culmination of that line—a ruling that lets the president remove those officials because, after all, the Constitution vests all executive power in the president, including being able to decide who exercises power in his name. This decision isn’t a gift to President Trump or those who succeed him, but a restoration of constitutional order. Congress can create executive-branch agencies and specify their authority, but it can’t create new branches of government unanswerable to anyone. Putting the FTC and other alphabet agencies back under presidential control doesn’t make the chief executive omnipotent; it makes the bureaucrats answerable to someone who’s answerable to the voters. At base, Trump v. Slaughter asks whether the people we elect to govern us get to do so—or whether appointed commissioners and their staffers can run the country on autopilot. In a republic, the buck should stop with the president, not assorted boards of “independent” mandarins. The Federal Reserve is an exception, however, because it’s never been considered an executive-branch agency and concerns about political interference in monetary policy go back to the Founding. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Gorsuch, is thus correct in his dissent in Trump v. Cook, that this “emergency” application for stay should’ve been granted or denied back in the fall, but instead we have an unsatisfying resolution that doesn’t resolve much and just sends the factual determination of whether Lisa Cook was properly fired “for cause” back where it should’ve been all along, in the district court. This all would’ve been resolved much sooner has the Supreme Court not insisted on full briefing, argument, and months of deliberation on what is correctly now known as the “interim-relief docket.”

Ilya Shapiro

27,570 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“Our government needs to be honest that Al-Qaeda is going to do this massive attack. Then they need to cut off the misinformation…it’s hard for people in the intelligence community that they’ve been fooled by terrorists, but they have been!” Sarah Adams explains what the US government needs to do to prepare for an upcoming terrorist attack. David Rutherford

“Our government needs to be honest that Al-Qaeda is going to do this massive attack. Then they need to cut off the misinformation…it’s hard for people in the intelligence community that they’ve been fooled by terrorists, but they have been!” Sarah Adams explains what the US government needs to do to prepare for an upcoming terrorist attack. David Rutherford

The David Rutherford Show

28,642 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

BREAKING: President Trump takes a MASSIVE VICTORY lap on Truth Social: “BIG WIN just moments ago at the Supreme Court, in the Slaughter Case, confirming Presidential Power in our Country to remove Executive Branch Officers and Agency Appointees, or Representatives, under Article II. This Decision was long sought by United States Presidents, dating all the way back to the 1930s. It is such an Honor to be the sitting President who won this Historic and Unprecedented Ruling, one of the most important ever given with respect to Presidential Powers. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

BREAKING: President Trump takes a MASSIVE VICTORY lap on Truth Social: “BIG WIN just moments ago at the Supreme Court, in the Slaughter Case, confirming Presidential Power in our Country to remove Executive Branch Officers and Agency Appointees, or Representatives, under Article II. This Decision was long sought by United States Presidents, dating all the way back to the 1930s. It is such an Honor to be the sitting President who won this Historic and Unprecedented Ruling, one of the most important ever given with respect to Presidential Powers. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

RedWave Press

33,360 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court has granted the president the power to fire and replace officials at independent government agencies like the FTC. But in a separate decision, the justices ruled that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook can stay in her job as she challenges Trump's efforts to fire her. The seemingly contradictory rulings suggest a two-tier system of regulation, says Alvaro Bedoya, a former FTC commissioner who was fired by Trump last year. The Federal Reserve is "the regulator that's most important to those central bankers, most important to those billionaire Wall Street bankers," explains Alvaro Bedoya.

The Supreme Court has granted the president the power to fire and replace officials at independent government agencies like the FTC. But in a separate decision, the justices ruled that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook can stay in her job as she challenges Trump's efforts to fire her. The seemingly contradictory rulings suggest a two-tier system of regulation, says Alvaro Bedoya, a former FTC commissioner who was fired by Trump last year. The Federal Reserve is "the regulator that's most important to those central bankers, most important to those billionaire Wall Street bankers," explains Alvaro Bedoya.

Democracy Now!

16,515 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING - The Federal Judge ruling CALLS President Trump's EO on the border "unlawful" and that the President does NOT have the authority to create a NEW process for people "seeking asylum" There for, he has to reverse EVERYTHING he's done at the Border.

🚨 BREAKING - The Federal Judge ruling CALLS President Trump's EO on the border "unlawful" and that the President does NOT have the authority to create a NEW process for people "seeking asylum" There for, he has to reverse EVERYTHING he's done at the Border.

The Patriot Oasis™

1,094,106 просмотров • 1 год назад

#BREAKING: Velshi: “When Congress created the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in 1914, it included a provision that commissioners could ONLY be removed for ‘inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance.’ Two decades later, after then President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to fire a man named William Humphrey, SCOTUS upheld that law and said that the president doesn’t have ‘illimitable power of removal.’ That case is known as Humphrey’s Executor v United States and for 91 years that was the law. Presidents could NOT FIRE the leaders of independent agencies without cause…until today. The six conservative justices who make up the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that Trump CAN fire [Commissioner] Slaughter, expanding the powers of the presidency as we know it.”

#BREAKING: Velshi: “When Congress created the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in 1914, it included a provision that commissioners could ONLY be removed for ‘inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance.’ Two decades later, after then President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to fire a man named William Humphrey, SCOTUS upheld that law and said that the president doesn’t have ‘illimitable power of removal.’ That case is known as Humphrey’s Executor v United States and for 91 years that was the law. Presidents could NOT FIRE the leaders of independent agencies without cause…until today. The six conservative justices who make up the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that Trump CAN fire [Commissioner] Slaughter, expanding the powers of the presidency as we know it.”

Emoluments Clause

18,427 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: Justice Brett Kavanaugh intellectually PUMMELS DEI Justice Ketanji Jackson at the Supreme Court on whether President Trump can fire a Democrat member of the FTC 🔥 JACKSON: I don't understand why the president gets to control everything and outweigh Congress' authority and duty to protect the people! KAVANAUGH: "When both houses of Congress and President are controlled by the same party - them creating a lot of these 'independent' agencies with or extending current independent agencies, into these situations, to THWART future presidents of the opposite party..." TRANSLATION: DEI Jackson wants single party rule to destroy Article 2 under the guise of "independence," Kavanaugh warns that's antithetical to the presidency.

🚨 BREAKING: Justice Brett Kavanaugh intellectually PUMMELS DEI Justice Ketanji Jackson at the Supreme Court on whether President Trump can fire a Democrat member of the FTC 🔥 JACKSON: I don't understand why the president gets to control everything and outweigh Congress' authority and duty to protect the people! KAVANAUGH: "When both houses of Congress and President are controlled by the same party - them creating a lot of these 'independent' agencies with or extending current independent agencies, into these situations, to THWART future presidents of the opposite party..." TRANSLATION: DEI Jackson wants single party rule to destroy Article 2 under the guise of "independence," Kavanaugh warns that's antithetical to the presidency.

Eric Daugherty

2,636,518 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

UFO Expert Jeremy Corbell's Advice to President Trump and The Intel Community on the 'Alien Files': People Are Ready For The Truth... "I understand why this was held secret for so long, we are past that." "I am really excited that President Trump has made this order but we have to force the intelligence agencies who have been naturally been guarding this for so long to do what has been mandated." "Let it all out. It is time."

UFO Expert Jeremy Corbell's Advice to President Trump and The Intel Community on the 'Alien Files': People Are Ready For The Truth... "I understand why this was held secret for so long, we are past that." "I am really excited that President Trump has made this order but we have to force the intelligence agencies who have been naturally been guarding this for so long to do what has been mandated." "Let it all out. It is time."

Benny Johnson

93,199 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨Scott Jennings just called the Democrats out on their raging hypocrisy about how Trump is handling his second term: "We have elections for a reason in this country. We vest all Executive authority in a President of the United States, not in an unelected bureaucracy, not in independent agencies, but in a President." "The president‘s agenda matters. When a Republican is president, the bureaucracy resists. It has to stop." "Two parties, Dana. One wants a bigger government. One wants a smaller government. I think I‘ll take it to the midterms."

🚨Scott Jennings just called the Democrats out on their raging hypocrisy about how Trump is handling his second term: "We have elections for a reason in this country. We vest all Executive authority in a President of the United States, not in an unelected bureaucracy, not in independent agencies, but in a President." "The president‘s agenda matters. When a Republican is president, the bureaucracy resists. It has to stop." "Two parties, Dana. One wants a bigger government. One wants a smaller government. I think I‘ll take it to the midterms."

Gunther Eagleman™

238,819 просмотров • 1 год назад

Leavitt: "There have been bureaucrats at some of these agencies that have been trying to act independent. They need to remember who they work for. It's the executive of the executive branch. You look at the US Institute of Peace for example. There was a bit of standoff with bureaucrats who didn't want to realize who they work for, and that is Donald Trump."

Leavitt: "There have been bureaucrats at some of these agencies that have been trying to act independent. They need to remember who they work for. It's the executive of the executive branch. You look at the US Institute of Peace for example. There was a bit of standoff with bureaucrats who didn't want to realize who they work for, and that is Donald Trump."

Aaron Rupar

756,821 просмотров • 1 год назад