正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Professors as Public Commentators - Moving Beyond Peer-Reviewed Articles

Gad Saad

1,383,288 subscribers

41,151 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

PEER-REVIEWED PAPER CLAIMS GENETICALLY ENGINEERING TICKS TO SPREAD ALPHA-GAL SYNDROME IS “MORALLY OBLIGATORY” WMU professors say CRISPR-edited ticks should be used as “moral bioenhancement” to FORCE humans away from eating meat. Bioterrorism is now masquerading as “bioethics.”

PEER-REVIEWED PAPER CLAIMS GENETICALLY ENGINEERING TICKS TO SPREAD ALPHA-GAL SYNDROME IS “MORALLY OBLIGATORY” WMU professors say CRISPR-edited ticks should be used as “moral bioenhancement” to FORCE humans away from eating meat. Bioterrorism is now masquerading as “bioethics.”

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

39,295 次观看 • 2 个月前

Must watch to understand how “peer reviewed” science is fully captured.

Must watch to understand how “peer reviewed” science is fully captured.

aussie17

207,976 次观看 • 3 年前

Dear Covid Vaccinated, New Peer Reviewed Study of 8,400,000 people - shows beyond any reasonable doubt that the Covid Vaccines dramatically increase your risk of Cancer. Why aren’t you absolutely raging yet?

Dear Covid Vaccinated, New Peer Reviewed Study of 8,400,000 people - shows beyond any reasonable doubt that the Covid Vaccines dramatically increase your risk of Cancer. Why aren’t you absolutely raging yet?

Concerned Citizen

554,122 次观看 • 10 个月前

RFK Jr. shuts down Senator Angela Alsobrooks when she calls him "dangerous" for citing peer-reviewed medical studies. RFK Jr: "Do you think science is dangerous, Senator? This is published, peer-reviewed studies." Alsobrooks: "I yield."

RFK Jr. shuts down Senator Angela Alsobrooks when she calls him "dangerous" for citing peer-reviewed medical studies. RFK Jr: "Do you think science is dangerous, Senator? This is published, peer-reviewed studies." Alsobrooks: "I yield."

Libs of TikTok

626,193 次观看 • 1 年前

Joseph Fraiman segment on his important findings published in the peer reviewed journal Vaccine.👇

Joseph Fraiman segment on his important findings published in the peer reviewed journal Vaccine.👇

Dr Tim Kelly

14,283 次观看 • 1 年前

A Peer reviewed Japanese & South Korean scientific paper has just confirmed beyond any reasonable doubt that the mRNA vaccines are responsible for this. We tried warning you all. Nobody needed to take these experimental shots.

A Peer reviewed Japanese & South Korean scientific paper has just confirmed beyond any reasonable doubt that the mRNA vaccines are responsible for this. We tried warning you all. Nobody needed to take these experimental shots.

Concerned Citizen

1,042,193 次观看 • 1 年前

Another COVID "conspiracy theory" becomes reality as a bombshell study CENSORED by The Lancet has now been peer-reviewed. What were they trying to hide, you ask? Lots and lots of vaccine deaths. After analyzing 325 COVID vaccine autopsy cases, the now peer-reviewed study found that “a total of 240 deaths, which is 73.9%, were independently adjudicated as DIRECTLY DUE to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”

Another COVID "conspiracy theory" becomes reality as a bombshell study CENSORED by The Lancet has now been peer-reviewed. What were they trying to hide, you ask? Lots and lots of vaccine deaths. After analyzing 325 COVID vaccine autopsy cases, the now peer-reviewed study found that “a total of 240 deaths, which is 73.9%, were independently adjudicated as DIRECTLY DUE to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,497,390 次观看 • 2 年前

New research suggests anti-Black racism underlies negative reactions to requests for DEI statements for employment among people who identify as conservative. See more from recent peer-reviewed studies:

New research suggests anti-Black racism underlies negative reactions to requests for DEI statements for employment among people who identify as conservative. See more from recent peer-reviewed studies:

American Psychological Association

34,474 次观看 • 1 年前

McCullough Foundation Report: Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder Full peer-reviewed report will be out soon. McCullough Foundation

McCullough Foundation Report: Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder Full peer-reviewed report will be out soon. McCullough Foundation

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

12,499 次观看 • 3 个月前

Thamizh Murugan is based on an unverified, non-peer-reviewed political book, not actual history. 📉 #ThamizhMurugan #Murugan

Thamizh Murugan is based on an unverified, non-peer-reviewed political book, not actual history. 📉 #ThamizhMurugan #Murugan

𝐋𝐨𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐡 𖤍 ˡᵘᵍᵉʳ

218,755 次观看 • 1 个月前

Artificial intelligence poses a serious threat to public health as it becomes embedded in our regulatory agencies and drug approval processes. All major large language models (LLMs) exhibit extreme bias in favor of mRNA injections — despite thousands of peer-reviewed studies exposing their deadly risks. Vigilant Fox 🦊 @zeee_media

Artificial intelligence poses a serious threat to public health as it becomes embedded in our regulatory agencies and drug approval processes. All major large language models (LLMs) exhibit extreme bias in favor of mRNA injections — despite thousands of peer-reviewed studies exposing their deadly risks. Vigilant Fox 🦊 @zeee_media

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

14,954 次观看 • 1 年前

A peer-reviewed Italian study reveals a shocking spike in cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccination. Hazard Ratios at 6-month follow-up: ➠ Breast Cancer: +54% ➠ Bladder Cancer: +62% ➠ Colorectal Cancer: +34% As noted by Dr. John Campbell, this is the critical data the public has been denied. While UK authorities withhold vaxxed vs. unvaxxed data, this study slips through the cracks, raising alarm bells the world cannot ignore. The full paper is publicly available in the Experimental and Clinical Sciences journal. This isn't conspiracy. It's peer-reviewed science.

A peer-reviewed Italian study reveals a shocking spike in cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccination. Hazard Ratios at 6-month follow-up: ➠ Breast Cancer: +54% ➠ Bladder Cancer: +62% ➠ Colorectal Cancer: +34% As noted by Dr. John Campbell, this is the critical data the public has been denied. While UK authorities withhold vaxxed vs. unvaxxed data, this study slips through the cracks, raising alarm bells the world cannot ignore. The full paper is publicly available in the Experimental and Clinical Sciences journal. This isn't conspiracy. It's peer-reviewed science.

Camus

253,362 次观看 • 10 个月前

Dr. Andrew Wakefield discusses the health outcomes of vaccinated children vs unvaccinated children based on a peer reviewed study of homeschooled children, parent observations, his clinical observations and the CDC’s data that was deliberately hidden from the public.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield discusses the health outcomes of vaccinated children vs unvaccinated children based on a peer reviewed study of homeschooled children, parent observations, his clinical observations and the CDC’s data that was deliberately hidden from the public.

Larry Cook

20,826 次观看 • 8 个月前

Two British Scientists conduct peer reviewed research which demonstrates that some vaccinated persons omit their own Bluetooth Signal. Experts are baffled.

Two British Scientists conduct peer reviewed research which demonstrates that some vaccinated persons omit their own Bluetooth Signal. Experts are baffled.

Concerned Citizen

49,667 次观看 • 7 个月前

The Illusion of Peer Review: A Fatal Flaw in Science Bret Weinstein highlights a critical flaw in how "peer-reviewed" science often misleads the public. A simple statistical error—like excluding inconvenient data points—can artificially inflate a treatment’s efficacy to 85% or higher, even if the intervention does nothing (e.g., "tap your nose three times"). Shockingly, this isn’t hypothetical. Multiple studies have used such methods to fabricate impressive results, yet peer review failed to catch them. If the system can’t spot these glaring distortions, what does it actually verify? The answer: Far less than we’re told. Weinstein compares modern peer review to the 2008 financial crisis, when rating agencies stamped junk mortgages as "AAA." The result? A facade of rigor masking systemic failure. Until science reforms its gatekeeping, "peer-reviewed" won’t mean trustworthy—just rubber-stamped.

The Illusion of Peer Review: A Fatal Flaw in Science Bret Weinstein highlights a critical flaw in how "peer-reviewed" science often misleads the public. A simple statistical error—like excluding inconvenient data points—can artificially inflate a treatment’s efficacy to 85% or higher, even if the intervention does nothing (e.g., "tap your nose three times"). Shockingly, this isn’t hypothetical. Multiple studies have used such methods to fabricate impressive results, yet peer review failed to catch them. If the system can’t spot these glaring distortions, what does it actually verify? The answer: Far less than we’re told. Weinstein compares modern peer review to the 2008 financial crisis, when rating agencies stamped junk mortgages as "AAA." The result? A facade of rigor masking systemic failure. Until science reforms its gatekeeping, "peer-reviewed" won’t mean trustworthy—just rubber-stamped.

Camus

74,764 次观看 • 1 年前