Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Prototype doesn't handle distractions very well... 🎙️ Voiced by Me! 🎨 Comic by: Nori 💖 🎥 Editing & Additional Voices: @g0blinns #PoppyPlaytime #PoppyPlaytimeChapter5 #ThePrototype #Prototype1006

TheVoiceOfComfy's profile picture

Comfy! 🎙️🌙

1,105 subscribers

62,657 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

#PoppyPlaytime#PoppyPlaytimeChapter5#ThePrototype#Prototype1006
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Prototype's tea time... surely nothing could go wrong? 🎙️ Voiced by Me! 🎨 Comic by: Nori 💖 🎥 Editing & Additional Voices: @g0blinns #PoppyPlaytime #PoppyPlaytimeChapter5 #ThePrototype #Prototype1006
0:34

Prototype's tea time... surely nothing could go wrong? 🎙️ Voiced by Me! 🎨 Comic by: Nori 💖 🎥 Editing & Additional Voices: @g0blinns #PoppyPlaytime #PoppyPlaytimeChapter5 #ThePrototype #Prototype1006

Comfy! 🎙️🌙

84,494 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I haven't voiced this old bird in a while comic by: Lex_99 Editing by yours truly :] Voices: Valem - me Vapor - Dr. Pester Rosemary - ۟ #pillarchase #pc2 #pillarchase2 #pillarchasefanart
0:22

I haven't voiced this old bird in a while comic by: Lex_99 Editing by yours truly :] Voices: Valem - me Vapor - Dr. Pester Rosemary - ۟ #pillarchase #pc2 #pillarchase2 #pillarchasefanart

AppletimeVA

14,126 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Animation by ジク | 🎨 by Glauco Silva | Additional animation, editing, VO by me. Sound effects from envato elements Bg music: Tekken Revolution “Tempest” Big thank you to everyone who has supported my comic this far! Links in the comments! #animation #Igotyou #comic
0:30

Animation by ジク | 🎨 by Glauco Silva | Additional animation, editing, VO by me. Sound effects from envato elements Bg music: Tekken Revolution “Tempest” Big thank you to everyone who has supported my comic this far! Links in the comments! #animation #Igotyou #comic

Roberto Rodriguez icon Comms open (3/10)

57,461 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Wild Wild Pussycats New Hero Pose 🎨Artwork was drawn by lawdy lewd 🎙️Mineta & Tiger voiced by me ♀️Used videogame assets (Avatar: TLoK) for female voice 💻Edits done by me
0:37

Sensitive content

Wild Wild Pussycats New Hero Pose 🎨Artwork was drawn by lawdy lewd 🎙️Mineta & Tiger voiced by me ♀️Used videogame assets (Avatar: TLoK) for female voice 💻Edits done by me

νγмιι

98,337 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“Welcome Back Luigi!” [Mario Comic Dub] 🐉💫 🎨Comic by Sarah Sketches (C0MMS CLOSED) 🔊SFX & Edeting: Me 🎙️Mario: Adam Curley 🎙️Peach: NecroNoire ☠️💍 Succubi-Zombie VTuber & VA 🎙️Daisy: Vocals.N.Art.VA 🎙️Luigi: DragonBoyVA [Very special thanks to the three talented voice actors mentioned here on the post. I had such an amazing time having to do this with you guys. You’re the best!] 🖤💜💙🩷🩵
1:17

“Welcome Back Luigi!” [Mario Comic Dub] 🐉💫 🎨Comic by Sarah Sketches (C0MMS CLOSED) 🔊SFX & Edeting: Me 🎙️Mario: Adam Curley 🎙️Peach: NecroNoire ☠️💍 Succubi-Zombie VTuber & VA 🎙️Daisy: Vocals.N.Art.VA 🎙️Luigi: DragonBoyVA [Very special thanks to the three talented voice actors mentioned here on the post. I had such an amazing time having to do this with you guys. You’re the best!] 🖤💜💙🩷🩵

DragonBoyVA

15,218 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Victor Davis Hanson on Megyn Kelly’s Sudden Anti-Israel Transformation! The audacity of Kelly to pretend she is the protector of Erka Kirk is just farcical on its face. Kelly does not have "the human inside" she claims to posses. Megyn Kelly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language Pastor Holthaus noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler." Pastor Brandon Holthaus, who leads a prophetic teaching ministry focused on exposing the truth of Bible prophecy, recently interviewed historian and commentator Victor Davis Hanson. Holthaus opened the conversation by expressing his belief that God has raised Hanson up as a voice of reason during these times, noting that Hanson is one of the few prominent figures who has not “went crazy.” Hanson shared his personal knowledge of several well-known conservative voices and his shock at their apparent transformation. He stated that he knew Tucker Carlson very well, having appeared on his show every Monday night and known him for 20 years. He expressed disbelief at what Carlson has become. Hanson also recounted meeting Megyn Kelly in Bakersfield after she called and asked him to appear on her show for no compensation. He described her at the time as “normal.” He further noted having dinner with Candace Owens and her husband, meeting Steve Bannon for dinner at LAX, and encountering Marjorie Taylor Greene when she was a “fanatic Trump supporter.” Holthaus voiced his bewilderment at the antisemitism and hostility toward Israel now displayed by these figures, saying he was “dumbfounded by it.” Victor Davis Hanson agreed and offered an explanation for the changes. He stated, “I think part of the problem was they all got very close to Trump. Very close. They were riding on Air Force One. They were in Mar-a-Lago every weekend. They had they called him up all the time and they felt they were important people. And so when he went in to get rid of the Iranian nuclear thing, they didn’t like it.” Hanson continued: “So they said, ‘How dare you do this? You got to listen to me.’ And he said, ‘I’m not going to listen to you.’ And they got very angry. They said, ‘We’re important people. We have the president’s ear. We tell them what to do.’ And they never realized that a thousand people say that and they’re not that important. And they got very, very angry. It was all about their ego and now it’s about clicks and things that the more outrageous they sound most of them have huge audiences from the Middle East and from Europe because of the antisemitism and pro-Muslim stuff.” Hanson then focused specifically on Megyn Kelly. He recalled appearing on her show regularly, including after the June bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. At that time, he said, Kelly gave “a very eloquent explanation of why this was not contrary to MAGA doctrine, why you had to stop these lunatics from getting the bomb and why we had to protect our allies like Israel.” Holthaus contrasted that earlier stance with Kelly’s later appearance on the Shawn Ryan show, where she reportedly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language he noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler. He observed that such tropes about Israel being “a cancer” are being repeated. While taking the matter very seriously, Hanson said he does not view the radical shift as fully authentic. He pointed out that he had been on her show every three weeks and found the change “too quick, it’s too quick and too sudden.” Hanson further highlighted the contrast by referencing one of Kelly’s earlier speeches, which he described as “one of the most vivid candid criticisms of Islam I’ve ever heard,” and juxtaposed it against her more recent comments.
3:35

Victor Davis Hanson on Megyn Kelly’s Sudden Anti-Israel Transformation! The audacity of Kelly to pretend she is the protector of Erka Kirk is just farcical on its face. Kelly does not have "the human inside" she claims to posses. Megyn Kelly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language Pastor Holthaus noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler." Pastor Brandon Holthaus, who leads a prophetic teaching ministry focused on exposing the truth of Bible prophecy, recently interviewed historian and commentator Victor Davis Hanson. Holthaus opened the conversation by expressing his belief that God has raised Hanson up as a voice of reason during these times, noting that Hanson is one of the few prominent figures who has not “went crazy.” Hanson shared his personal knowledge of several well-known conservative voices and his shock at their apparent transformation. He stated that he knew Tucker Carlson very well, having appeared on his show every Monday night and known him for 20 years. He expressed disbelief at what Carlson has become. Hanson also recounted meeting Megyn Kelly in Bakersfield after she called and asked him to appear on her show for no compensation. He described her at the time as “normal.” He further noted having dinner with Candace Owens and her husband, meeting Steve Bannon for dinner at LAX, and encountering Marjorie Taylor Greene when she was a “fanatic Trump supporter.” Holthaus voiced his bewilderment at the antisemitism and hostility toward Israel now displayed by these figures, saying he was “dumbfounded by it.” Victor Davis Hanson agreed and offered an explanation for the changes. He stated, “I think part of the problem was they all got very close to Trump. Very close. They were riding on Air Force One. They were in Mar-a-Lago every weekend. They had they called him up all the time and they felt they were important people. And so when he went in to get rid of the Iranian nuclear thing, they didn’t like it.” Hanson continued: “So they said, ‘How dare you do this? You got to listen to me.’ And he said, ‘I’m not going to listen to you.’ And they got very angry. They said, ‘We’re important people. We have the president’s ear. We tell them what to do.’ And they never realized that a thousand people say that and they’re not that important. And they got very, very angry. It was all about their ego and now it’s about clicks and things that the more outrageous they sound most of them have huge audiences from the Middle East and from Europe because of the antisemitism and pro-Muslim stuff.” Hanson then focused specifically on Megyn Kelly. He recalled appearing on her show regularly, including after the June bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. At that time, he said, Kelly gave “a very eloquent explanation of why this was not contrary to MAGA doctrine, why you had to stop these lunatics from getting the bomb and why we had to protect our allies like Israel.” Holthaus contrasted that earlier stance with Kelly’s later appearance on the Shawn Ryan show, where she reportedly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language he noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler. He observed that such tropes about Israel being “a cancer” are being repeated. While taking the matter very seriously, Hanson said he does not view the radical shift as fully authentic. He pointed out that he had been on her show every three weeks and found the change “too quick, it’s too quick and too sudden.” Hanson further highlighted the contrast by referencing one of Kelly’s earlier speeches, which he described as “one of the most vivid candid criticisms of Islam I’ve ever heard,” and juxtaposed it against her more recent comments.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

39,185 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Admin post: The big, tough looking guy with the shaved head that had dogs in bite sports and upper level obedience once referred to me as the "Badass woman in the wheelchair with the Rottweilers" and told me I was probably the toughest person he knew. Most people see disability as weak. They have no idea the resiliency we develop to keep moving forward despite all the barriers, the biggest one being attitude. Even getting up, going to the bathroom, and getting dressed is hard work. There's always pain. Pretty much every single thing I do is significantly harder than when I could walk. It's isolating, but often it's too exhausting to notice. People see this middle aged woman with no legs in a power wheelchair walk her well mannered dog and think it's sweet. I'm constantly asked who trains my dogs because most people are quick to make assumptions that I can't. Where other people can simply say they're capable of doing something, I have to prove it to be believed. The past 2 years I've packed and loaded the van, driven myself and 2 powerful dogs hundreds of kilometers, lugged our stuff into hotels where I usually have to move furniture to get a plug in by the bed for my wheelchair charger. I've exercised and pottied dogs in hotel parking lots in wind, rain, and snow. I've done the same early mornings and long days as everyone else there. Sometimes we do ok. Sometimes we do brilliantly. Just because I don't have legs doesn't mean I can't go out there and kick ass. Despite being 2025, there's still a ton of barriers in the world and planning and decisions are typically made by able-bodied who often can't envision the impact they have on others. Being disabled comes with significant extra financial burden, and often policies are put in place that just make it more difficult. Very few days go by where I don't have to advocate for myself and others or fight for what should be a right. It can get extremely disheartening, and sometimes I want to just give up fighting and say they win. I don't. I don't call myself handicapped. I use the term disabled. The term handicapped is used in horse racing. The horse that has proven itself to be superior is required to carry extra weight to make it "fair" for others. The attitudes towards disabilities, the barriers that exist in the built environment, and many of the policies in government are what handicap us. They place the additional challenge on us that often prevent us from succeeding. They often prevent us from even participating. The big guy with the shaved head was right. I'm very tough. I have to be tougher than everyone else just to get to be there. When you see someone with a disability and judge them as weak, ask yourself just how well you'd do in their situation, facing the barriers they face. There's a good chance they're every bit as tough as you. Video description for inclusivity: clips of a woman in a power wheelchair and a large rottweiler competing in performance events at dog shows
0:29

Admin post: The big, tough looking guy with the shaved head that had dogs in bite sports and upper level obedience once referred to me as the "Badass woman in the wheelchair with the Rottweilers" and told me I was probably the toughest person he knew. Most people see disability as weak. They have no idea the resiliency we develop to keep moving forward despite all the barriers, the biggest one being attitude. Even getting up, going to the bathroom, and getting dressed is hard work. There's always pain. Pretty much every single thing I do is significantly harder than when I could walk. It's isolating, but often it's too exhausting to notice. People see this middle aged woman with no legs in a power wheelchair walk her well mannered dog and think it's sweet. I'm constantly asked who trains my dogs because most people are quick to make assumptions that I can't. Where other people can simply say they're capable of doing something, I have to prove it to be believed. The past 2 years I've packed and loaded the van, driven myself and 2 powerful dogs hundreds of kilometers, lugged our stuff into hotels where I usually have to move furniture to get a plug in by the bed for my wheelchair charger. I've exercised and pottied dogs in hotel parking lots in wind, rain, and snow. I've done the same early mornings and long days as everyone else there. Sometimes we do ok. Sometimes we do brilliantly. Just because I don't have legs doesn't mean I can't go out there and kick ass. Despite being 2025, there's still a ton of barriers in the world and planning and decisions are typically made by able-bodied who often can't envision the impact they have on others. Being disabled comes with significant extra financial burden, and often policies are put in place that just make it more difficult. Very few days go by where I don't have to advocate for myself and others or fight for what should be a right. It can get extremely disheartening, and sometimes I want to just give up fighting and say they win. I don't. I don't call myself handicapped. I use the term disabled. The term handicapped is used in horse racing. The horse that has proven itself to be superior is required to carry extra weight to make it "fair" for others. The attitudes towards disabilities, the barriers that exist in the built environment, and many of the policies in government are what handicap us. They place the additional challenge on us that often prevent us from succeeding. They often prevent us from even participating. The big guy with the shaved head was right. I'm very tough. I have to be tougher than everyone else just to get to be there. When you see someone with a disability and judge them as weak, ask yourself just how well you'd do in their situation, facing the barriers they face. There's a good chance they're every bit as tough as you. Video description for inclusivity: clips of a woman in a power wheelchair and a large rottweiler competing in performance events at dog shows

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

30,591 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Last night in Malba, a large group of individuals from outside my district conducted an illegal 'takeover' of a quiet residential street at approximately 12:30am. This is not the first time it's happened. A private security guard attempted to calm the situation -- he was assaulted by the mob and his vehicle was set on fire. He suffered significant injuries. A local resident was also assaulted. Response to this incident was less than ideal. Residents reporting the incident to 911 were told that 'quality of life team' and 311 should handle the situation. Unacceptable. In fact, these violent street takeovers should be met with maximum force by the police department. We have NEVER had these problems before. Now it's an epidemic. What changed? We stopped arresting criminals. I am meeting this morning with the chief of department and the local precinct at the scene to discuss exactly what happened last night. I have already been assured that Malba will receive four dedicated patrol cars from this point forward, as well as additional security upgrades that we cannot disclose. However, the city MUST do something to stop this lawlessness. All the speed cameras in the world do absolutely NOTHING to prevent these incidents -- we need police response and the most severe consequences for these criminals, not to simply allow them to drive away after they've completed their mayhem. These incidents are happening citywide, and they're happening because there are no longer any real consequences to this kind of criminality. But let me make something very clear to the criminals -- you are risking your lives bringing this chaos into our neighborhoods. I know for a fact there were multiple armed residents who exercised extreme restraint last night, however that level of restraint is not guaranteed. If the city refuses to do what's necessary, the people might. Once again I want to urge any residents of my district who are interested in obtaining their carry or premises permits to contact my office. We are offering assistance with the application process and legal fees to all who wish to exercise their constitutional right to self protection.
0:46

Last night in Malba, a large group of individuals from outside my district conducted an illegal 'takeover' of a quiet residential street at approximately 12:30am. This is not the first time it's happened. A private security guard attempted to calm the situation -- he was assaulted by the mob and his vehicle was set on fire. He suffered significant injuries. A local resident was also assaulted. Response to this incident was less than ideal. Residents reporting the incident to 911 were told that 'quality of life team' and 311 should handle the situation. Unacceptable. In fact, these violent street takeovers should be met with maximum force by the police department. We have NEVER had these problems before. Now it's an epidemic. What changed? We stopped arresting criminals. I am meeting this morning with the chief of department and the local precinct at the scene to discuss exactly what happened last night. I have already been assured that Malba will receive four dedicated patrol cars from this point forward, as well as additional security upgrades that we cannot disclose. However, the city MUST do something to stop this lawlessness. All the speed cameras in the world do absolutely NOTHING to prevent these incidents -- we need police response and the most severe consequences for these criminals, not to simply allow them to drive away after they've completed their mayhem. These incidents are happening citywide, and they're happening because there are no longer any real consequences to this kind of criminality. But let me make something very clear to the criminals -- you are risking your lives bringing this chaos into our neighborhoods. I know for a fact there were multiple armed residents who exercised extreme restraint last night, however that level of restraint is not guaranteed. If the city refuses to do what's necessary, the people might. Once again I want to urge any residents of my district who are interested in obtaining their carry or premises permits to contact my office. We are offering assistance with the application process and legal fees to all who wish to exercise their constitutional right to self protection.

Hon. Vickie Paladino

882,919 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Alfred Hitchcock on why 'Vertigo' (1958) flopped & how Kim Novak feels about not wearing a brassiere: "Truffaut: I understand that the picture was neither a hit nor a failure. Hitchcock: It has made money by now. Truffaut: In your terms, wouldn't that be considered a flop? Hitchcock: I suppose so. One of our whimsies when a picture isn't doing too well is to blame it on the faulty exploitation. So let's live up to the tradition and say they just didn't handle the sales properly! Do you know that I had Vera Miles in mind for 'Vertigo', and we had done the whole wardrobe and the final tests with her? Truffaut: Didn't Paramount want her? Hitchcock: Paramount was perfectly willing to have her, but she became pregnant just before the part that was going to turn her into a star. After that I lost interest; I couldn't get the rhythm going with her again. Truffaut: I take it, from some of your interviews, that you weren't too happy with Kim Novak, but I thought she was perfect for the picture. There was a passive, animal quality about her that was exactly right for the part. Hitchcock: Miss Novak arrived on the set with all sorts of preconceived notions that I couldn't possibly go along with. You know, I don't like to argue with a performer on the set; there's no reason to bring the electricians in on our troubles. I went to Kim Novak's dressing room and told her about the dresses and hairdos that I had been planning for several months. I also explained that the story was of less importance to me than the over-all visual impact on the screen, once the picture is completed. Truffaut: It seems to me these unpleasant formalities make you unfair in assessing the whole picture. I can assure you that those who admire 'Vertigo' like Kim Novak in it. Very few American actresses are quite as carnal on the screen. When you see Judy walking on the street, the tawny hair and make-up convey an animal-like sensuality. That quality is accentuated, I suppose, by the fact that she wears no brassiere. Hitchcock: That's right, she doesn't wear a brassiere. As a matter of fact, she is particularly proud of that!" ("Hitchcock/Truffaut", 1983) P.S: On this day, 68 years ago, "Vertigo" (1958) premiered at San Francisco, USA.
1:25

Alfred Hitchcock on why 'Vertigo' (1958) flopped & how Kim Novak feels about not wearing a brassiere: "Truffaut: I understand that the picture was neither a hit nor a failure. Hitchcock: It has made money by now. Truffaut: In your terms, wouldn't that be considered a flop? Hitchcock: I suppose so. One of our whimsies when a picture isn't doing too well is to blame it on the faulty exploitation. So let's live up to the tradition and say they just didn't handle the sales properly! Do you know that I had Vera Miles in mind for 'Vertigo', and we had done the whole wardrobe and the final tests with her? Truffaut: Didn't Paramount want her? Hitchcock: Paramount was perfectly willing to have her, but she became pregnant just before the part that was going to turn her into a star. After that I lost interest; I couldn't get the rhythm going with her again. Truffaut: I take it, from some of your interviews, that you weren't too happy with Kim Novak, but I thought she was perfect for the picture. There was a passive, animal quality about her that was exactly right for the part. Hitchcock: Miss Novak arrived on the set with all sorts of preconceived notions that I couldn't possibly go along with. You know, I don't like to argue with a performer on the set; there's no reason to bring the electricians in on our troubles. I went to Kim Novak's dressing room and told her about the dresses and hairdos that I had been planning for several months. I also explained that the story was of less importance to me than the over-all visual impact on the screen, once the picture is completed. Truffaut: It seems to me these unpleasant formalities make you unfair in assessing the whole picture. I can assure you that those who admire 'Vertigo' like Kim Novak in it. Very few American actresses are quite as carnal on the screen. When you see Judy walking on the street, the tawny hair and make-up convey an animal-like sensuality. That quality is accentuated, I suppose, by the fact that she wears no brassiere. Hitchcock: That's right, she doesn't wear a brassiere. As a matter of fact, she is particularly proud of that!" ("Hitchcock/Truffaut", 1983) P.S: On this day, 68 years ago, "Vertigo" (1958) premiered at San Francisco, USA.

DepressedBergman

134,639 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Today my baby brother, Kenji the Mooseweiler, experienced his first skybooms. ⛈️ I'm a Professional Good Girl™ and Big Sis extraordinaire, so of course I volunteered to help him have a positive experience so he could develop his confidence. Actually, I volunteered because I knew there would loads of treats. Developing his confidence is important too though. We don't want him growing into 125 pounds of muscular rottie that panics, cries and bolts every time there's a thunderstorm. The Golden Retrievers down the street would never let us live that down! It wasn't a hard job but it was an important one. If a puppy's first experience with something that's potentially scary is made fun or pleasant, they're much less likely to be fearful or stressed by it. It takes a VERY long time to counter condition fearful things, so this is time well spent. I basically just had to show him I wasn't worried about the noise and that chasing treats was way more important. It can be really helpful if a puppy has an older, confident dog they are comfortable with when they're introduced to a new situation. Letting Kenji see the thunder doesn't bother me at all makes it much less scary. When we first went outside the human tossed some treats around so we were busy sniffing them out when the thunder cracked. Kenji was a little startled by the first 💥 BOOM 💥 he heard outside, which is normal. He nearly tripped over his giant moose paws as he scurried to get closer to the human so he could feel safe while he tried to figure out what happened. He looked at me and saw me munching on a piece of beef liver. Neither the human nor I made a big deal of the thunder. She gave him a quick pat and tossed more treats around. I chased them so naturally he raced to try and hoover them up with his oversized face first. BOOM! He looked up briefly then went back to his sniff and scarf routine. Waited a few minutes more of chasing treats and if he seemed to be pretty comfortable. We went back inside before the storm got too close to us because the goal is not to traumatize him in pouring rain and hail. Some dogs might need to play this game in a few thunderstorms before they get home, but the thunder left for a while and came back in the evening and Kenji was perfectly comfortable with it. Obviously I did my job well, and should have been compensated more. I may need help renegotiating my wage. 🎥 Chasing treats as the storm rolls in #PuppyTraining #XDogs
1:10

Today my baby brother, Kenji the Mooseweiler, experienced his first skybooms. ⛈️ I'm a Professional Good Girl™ and Big Sis extraordinaire, so of course I volunteered to help him have a positive experience so he could develop his confidence. Actually, I volunteered because I knew there would loads of treats. Developing his confidence is important too though. We don't want him growing into 125 pounds of muscular rottie that panics, cries and bolts every time there's a thunderstorm. The Golden Retrievers down the street would never let us live that down! It wasn't a hard job but it was an important one. If a puppy's first experience with something that's potentially scary is made fun or pleasant, they're much less likely to be fearful or stressed by it. It takes a VERY long time to counter condition fearful things, so this is time well spent. I basically just had to show him I wasn't worried about the noise and that chasing treats was way more important. It can be really helpful if a puppy has an older, confident dog they are comfortable with when they're introduced to a new situation. Letting Kenji see the thunder doesn't bother me at all makes it much less scary. When we first went outside the human tossed some treats around so we were busy sniffing them out when the thunder cracked. Kenji was a little startled by the first 💥 BOOM 💥 he heard outside, which is normal. He nearly tripped over his giant moose paws as he scurried to get closer to the human so he could feel safe while he tried to figure out what happened. He looked at me and saw me munching on a piece of beef liver. Neither the human nor I made a big deal of the thunder. She gave him a quick pat and tossed more treats around. I chased them so naturally he raced to try and hoover them up with his oversized face first. BOOM! He looked up briefly then went back to his sniff and scarf routine. Waited a few minutes more of chasing treats and if he seemed to be pretty comfortable. We went back inside before the storm got too close to us because the goal is not to traumatize him in pouring rain and hail. Some dogs might need to play this game in a few thunderstorms before they get home, but the thunder left for a while and came back in the evening and Kenji was perfectly comfortable with it. Obviously I did my job well, and should have been compensated more. I may need help renegotiating my wage. 🎥 Chasing treats as the storm rolls in #PuppyTraining #XDogs

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

12,378 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Warren Buffett: "If we can't make a decision in five minutes, we can't make it in five months." In a Q&A, a shareholder from Munich, Germany asks Buffett a specific question: how large is the universe of companies whose intrinsic value he carries in his head — the ones he could act on within a day or two if the market offered an attractive price? Buffett doesn't give a number. He reframes the question entirely. Speed, he explains, doesn't come from knowing more. It comes from refusing to think about most things at all. "Our immediate decision is whether we can figure out what's being offered to us or not. I mean, there's a go no-go signal." That signal fires almost immediately: "Charlie and I are often thought to be rude when we think we're just being polite and not wasting the other person's time. So, as they start mid-sentence in their first conversation with us, we just say, 'Forget it.'" He continues: "We know very, very, very early in the conversation whether somebody's talking about something that there's any chance is actionable by us, and we don't worry about the ones we miss." The filter isn't about the quality of the opportunity. It's about whether Buffett is equipped to judge it: "We want to make sure that we don't waste any time thinking about things that, when we got all through thinking about them, we're not going to know enough to make the decision on. So we just rule those out, and that rules a lot of things out." What survives that filter gets decided on immediately: "So we make decisions—we can make a decision in five minutes very easily. I mean, it just is not that complicated." Then comes the line that explains the whole system: "If we can't make a decision in five minutes, we can't make it in five months. You know, there's—we're not going to learn enough in the following five months to make up for the fact that we went in deficient in the first place." Deliberation doesn't fix a knowledge deficit. If you weren't already competent to judge the thing, five months of study won't close the gap — it will only manufacture the confidence to act badly. So when the input arrives — a phone call about a business for sale, or a price in a newspaper, a magazine, an annual report, a 10-K — the only thing Buffett is looking for is a "significant differential between price and value." If it's there, "we move right then." "And Charlie and I don't need to talk to each other about it; I mean, we both think the same way and we have generally similar spheres of knowledge." Charlie Munger then names the mechanism directly: "The answer to your question is we can make a lot of decisions about a lot of things very fast and very easily, and we're unusual in that respect. And the reason we're able to do that is there's such an enormous other lot of things that we won't allow ourselves to think about at all. It's just that simple." He gives his own example: "I have a little phrase when people make pitches to me, and about halfway through the first sentence I say, 'We don't do startups; they don't exist.' Well, if you blot out startups, there's a whole layer of complexity that goes out of your life." And he confirms this is a system, not a one-off: "And we've got other little 'blotter out' systems, and using those we finally find out that what remains is still a pretty large territory that we can handle." Buffett closes with the part most people get backwards: "We waste—I would say we waste a lot of time, but we waste it on things we want to waste our time on. And then we're very selective about that, and then we're good at it." The five-minute decision is not actually made in five minutes. Source: 2008 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting
4:52

Warren Buffett: "If we can't make a decision in five minutes, we can't make it in five months." In a Q&A, a shareholder from Munich, Germany asks Buffett a specific question: how large is the universe of companies whose intrinsic value he carries in his head — the ones he could act on within a day or two if the market offered an attractive price? Buffett doesn't give a number. He reframes the question entirely. Speed, he explains, doesn't come from knowing more. It comes from refusing to think about most things at all. "Our immediate decision is whether we can figure out what's being offered to us or not. I mean, there's a go no-go signal." That signal fires almost immediately: "Charlie and I are often thought to be rude when we think we're just being polite and not wasting the other person's time. So, as they start mid-sentence in their first conversation with us, we just say, 'Forget it.'" He continues: "We know very, very, very early in the conversation whether somebody's talking about something that there's any chance is actionable by us, and we don't worry about the ones we miss." The filter isn't about the quality of the opportunity. It's about whether Buffett is equipped to judge it: "We want to make sure that we don't waste any time thinking about things that, when we got all through thinking about them, we're not going to know enough to make the decision on. So we just rule those out, and that rules a lot of things out." What survives that filter gets decided on immediately: "So we make decisions—we can make a decision in five minutes very easily. I mean, it just is not that complicated." Then comes the line that explains the whole system: "If we can't make a decision in five minutes, we can't make it in five months. You know, there's—we're not going to learn enough in the following five months to make up for the fact that we went in deficient in the first place." Deliberation doesn't fix a knowledge deficit. If you weren't already competent to judge the thing, five months of study won't close the gap — it will only manufacture the confidence to act badly. So when the input arrives — a phone call about a business for sale, or a price in a newspaper, a magazine, an annual report, a 10-K — the only thing Buffett is looking for is a "significant differential between price and value." If it's there, "we move right then." "And Charlie and I don't need to talk to each other about it; I mean, we both think the same way and we have generally similar spheres of knowledge." Charlie Munger then names the mechanism directly: "The answer to your question is we can make a lot of decisions about a lot of things very fast and very easily, and we're unusual in that respect. And the reason we're able to do that is there's such an enormous other lot of things that we won't allow ourselves to think about at all. It's just that simple." He gives his own example: "I have a little phrase when people make pitches to me, and about halfway through the first sentence I say, 'We don't do startups; they don't exist.' Well, if you blot out startups, there's a whole layer of complexity that goes out of your life." And he confirms this is a system, not a one-off: "And we've got other little 'blotter out' systems, and using those we finally find out that what remains is still a pretty large territory that we can handle." Buffett closes with the part most people get backwards: "We waste—I would say we waste a lot of time, but we waste it on things we want to waste our time on. And then we're very selective about that, and then we're good at it." The five-minute decision is not actually made in five minutes. Source: 2008 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting

Finance Nerd

54,443 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

new interview of #zhanglinghe with CCTV Dramas for #Overdo 💬🔥 I really, really want to experience dramas with different professions. I feel that through playing a character like this, I can experience some things about that profession. This experience came after I played He Suye. Because, to be honest, before I played He Suye, I didn't really understand traditional Chinese medicine. But after playing He Suye, I gained a certain understanding of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and it also aroused a certain amount of interest in me. After that, in my life, the words TCM actually appeared frequently. So I feel that if I act in a drama about another profession, perhaps I would also gain some knowledge, understanding, and learning about that character's profession. (talking about documentary🌱) When filming a drama, you are in the character, and there is a script. You freely perform within a limited range. But a documentary is not like that. A documentary is me, Zhang Jiawei myself, going there. Although I hadn't touched that world for a few years and the memories had faded a bit, rediscovering that old passion felt completely different from acting. Filming a drama is about emotional expression, but in the documentary I participated in, I entered into their work. It was like the happiness I get from opening my computer every day, or opening my Lego and assembling it. The source of this happiness is different. I just like the process of assembling things. Whether it's assembling a computer or assembling Lego, the process of assembling, the hands-on process, makes me produce that kind of dopamine. I like to take finished products apart to see what's inside and then put them back together. It's a genuine hobby of mine; whenever I see a finished product, I find myself asking questions: How does it work? How does it light up? How did it end up functioning the way it does? All of these are unknown to me. I just like exploring unknown things. So, in this aspect, making documentaries gives me more happiness. Before, I always said, "Do a good job as a good actor." Actually, this sentence is very broad. For me now, I feel there are many things I can do in the future, especially recently after I became interested in photography. I discovered that these two words, "performance", are not merely an actor's emotional expression in front of the camera. There are many things that can assist these things, such as lighting and cinematography. Of course, first of all, as an actor, I have to do my own job well. Secondly, I am very willing to study some other departments. After completing a good performance in a production and taking on some responsibilities, if there happens to be a possibility in the future, I can also try some other departments. Of course, this doesn't mean I want to change careers 😂 I am interested in all of them because they are all the things I come into closest contact with around me. I have my own standards for choosing my next role. It is about what kind of role is suitable for me at my current stage, with my current experience and my current age. I will look at what kinds of scripts. Many people will tell me to act in some mature roles. The kind of roles that, in my view, are relatively far from me. I'm not saying that I don't want to try them or that I don't dare to try them, but rather I feel that my current experience may not yet be enough to handle them. Rather than reaching for something beyond my current capabilities, I'd prefer to focus on areas where I can still grow. Solidifying my position in my current niche, honing my craft, gaining experience, and then moving steadily upward step by step. That's how I see it.
3:30

new interview of #zhanglinghe with CCTV Dramas for #Overdo 💬🔥 I really, really want to experience dramas with different professions. I feel that through playing a character like this, I can experience some things about that profession. This experience came after I played He Suye. Because, to be honest, before I played He Suye, I didn't really understand traditional Chinese medicine. But after playing He Suye, I gained a certain understanding of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and it also aroused a certain amount of interest in me. After that, in my life, the words TCM actually appeared frequently. So I feel that if I act in a drama about another profession, perhaps I would also gain some knowledge, understanding, and learning about that character's profession. (talking about documentary🌱) When filming a drama, you are in the character, and there is a script. You freely perform within a limited range. But a documentary is not like that. A documentary is me, Zhang Jiawei myself, going there. Although I hadn't touched that world for a few years and the memories had faded a bit, rediscovering that old passion felt completely different from acting. Filming a drama is about emotional expression, but in the documentary I participated in, I entered into their work. It was like the happiness I get from opening my computer every day, or opening my Lego and assembling it. The source of this happiness is different. I just like the process of assembling things. Whether it's assembling a computer or assembling Lego, the process of assembling, the hands-on process, makes me produce that kind of dopamine. I like to take finished products apart to see what's inside and then put them back together. It's a genuine hobby of mine; whenever I see a finished product, I find myself asking questions: How does it work? How does it light up? How did it end up functioning the way it does? All of these are unknown to me. I just like exploring unknown things. So, in this aspect, making documentaries gives me more happiness. Before, I always said, "Do a good job as a good actor." Actually, this sentence is very broad. For me now, I feel there are many things I can do in the future, especially recently after I became interested in photography. I discovered that these two words, "performance", are not merely an actor's emotional expression in front of the camera. There are many things that can assist these things, such as lighting and cinematography. Of course, first of all, as an actor, I have to do my own job well. Secondly, I am very willing to study some other departments. After completing a good performance in a production and taking on some responsibilities, if there happens to be a possibility in the future, I can also try some other departments. Of course, this doesn't mean I want to change careers 😂 I am interested in all of them because they are all the things I come into closest contact with around me. I have my own standards for choosing my next role. It is about what kind of role is suitable for me at my current stage, with my current experience and my current age. I will look at what kinds of scripts. Many people will tell me to act in some mature roles. The kind of roles that, in my view, are relatively far from me. I'm not saying that I don't want to try them or that I don't dare to try them, but rather I feel that my current experience may not yet be enough to handle them. Rather than reaching for something beyond my current capabilities, I'd prefer to focus on areas where I can still grow. Solidifying my position in my current niche, honing my craft, gaining experience, and then moving steadily upward step by step. That's how I see it.

张凌赫的小核桃𖹭

14,410 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

‘HE IS KING’ 🎥💻 WORLD PREMIERE!! 🔥🔥🔥 #AIfilm taking a huge leap forward.. Thank you to everyone who has supported me and my work, including my family and close friends, it has meant the world to me, especially as I transitioned into this new space and my work took a new direction abruptly haha. AI has significantly changed my life for the better. As a visual artist & filmmaker who lives on the fringe of creative expression and work spans a range of mediums and style, this is the first time in my life, where what I am doing has given me more than inspired drive, it’s given me purpose. When I set out to make this film I wanted to tell a different kind of story, while also showing everyone what I envision for my work and the voice I wanna have as a filmmaker and artist. Time is so short in life, and often times we aren’t lucky enough to find what I’ve found. So for me, that’s what drives me, along with the need to tell stories visually of course haha. But, that sense of purpose, I want to inspire people to want to be more. Not for success, but for self fulfillment. HE IS KING, is a powerful, AI-generated short film that reframes one of the most iconic moments in American history. Written and directed by myself, the film offers an emotionally intimate and visually groundbreaking exploration of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the day of his legendary “I Have a Dream” speech. “HE IS KING" is witnessed as a cinematic moment, a glimpse, of a man, a message, and a movement. Told through an emotionally intimate story and unique perspective, the film follows Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the day of his most iconic address, the “I Have a Dream” speech delivered from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. But it does more than document a moment we all know well, it pulls the audience into the soul of a leader preparing to speak truth to a nation on the edge of transformation, these moments are the moments histories most undeniable choices and creation around them, are rarely told or shown. From quiet moments writing in a candlelit church, to the silent prayer of a man alone with his thoughts, to the thunderous crescendo of a quarter-million people answering his call, "HE IS KING" honors the legacy of a man not as a monument, but as a human being carrying the weight of a dream. Segregation, resistance, and unity are woven through the speech like visual echoes, grounding King’s words in lived experiences. With meticulous period detail through research, grounded performances, and a reverent tone manifested through my vision and AI, the film captures the urgency, hope, and sacrifice of the civil rights movement through a modern lens of technology today giving a uniquely spectacular showcase of what is possible in today's world. The film is a testament to the enduring power of truth as well, spoken aloud and carried forward. It captures the soul of a movement while reminding us that the dream never died with him, it evolved, rising through the voices of new leaders, and now, through innovations like AI, it has the ability to reach beyond time, across borders, and into the hands of future generations. This is not just a story about a speech. It’s about the responsibility, and the promise, of being the ones who still dream. ❤️🎥 DH Created with: Google DeepMind VEO, Runway GEN 3/4 for some of the speech shots using GVFX custom promoted filters, Kling AI 1.6 LipSync, custom voice workflow to create a new unique voice closely resembling King, Magnific.ai with their masterful upscaling in the vintage shots I created, Adobe Video Premiere/AfterEffects for editing/Color Grading, and the finish from Topaz Labs to bring it to you in 4k brilliance!
16:40

‘HE IS KING’ 🎥💻 WORLD PREMIERE!! 🔥🔥🔥 #AIfilm taking a huge leap forward.. Thank you to everyone who has supported me and my work, including my family and close friends, it has meant the world to me, especially as I transitioned into this new space and my work took a new direction abruptly haha. AI has significantly changed my life for the better. As a visual artist & filmmaker who lives on the fringe of creative expression and work spans a range of mediums and style, this is the first time in my life, where what I am doing has given me more than inspired drive, it’s given me purpose. When I set out to make this film I wanted to tell a different kind of story, while also showing everyone what I envision for my work and the voice I wanna have as a filmmaker and artist. Time is so short in life, and often times we aren’t lucky enough to find what I’ve found. So for me, that’s what drives me, along with the need to tell stories visually of course haha. But, that sense of purpose, I want to inspire people to want to be more. Not for success, but for self fulfillment. HE IS KING, is a powerful, AI-generated short film that reframes one of the most iconic moments in American history. Written and directed by myself, the film offers an emotionally intimate and visually groundbreaking exploration of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the day of his legendary “I Have a Dream” speech. “HE IS KING" is witnessed as a cinematic moment, a glimpse, of a man, a message, and a movement. Told through an emotionally intimate story and unique perspective, the film follows Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the day of his most iconic address, the “I Have a Dream” speech delivered from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. But it does more than document a moment we all know well, it pulls the audience into the soul of a leader preparing to speak truth to a nation on the edge of transformation, these moments are the moments histories most undeniable choices and creation around them, are rarely told or shown. From quiet moments writing in a candlelit church, to the silent prayer of a man alone with his thoughts, to the thunderous crescendo of a quarter-million people answering his call, "HE IS KING" honors the legacy of a man not as a monument, but as a human being carrying the weight of a dream. Segregation, resistance, and unity are woven through the speech like visual echoes, grounding King’s words in lived experiences. With meticulous period detail through research, grounded performances, and a reverent tone manifested through my vision and AI, the film captures the urgency, hope, and sacrifice of the civil rights movement through a modern lens of technology today giving a uniquely spectacular showcase of what is possible in today's world. The film is a testament to the enduring power of truth as well, spoken aloud and carried forward. It captures the soul of a movement while reminding us that the dream never died with him, it evolved, rising through the voices of new leaders, and now, through innovations like AI, it has the ability to reach beyond time, across borders, and into the hands of future generations. This is not just a story about a speech. It’s about the responsibility, and the promise, of being the ones who still dream. ❤️🎥 DH Created with: Google DeepMind VEO, Runway GEN 3/4 for some of the speech shots using GVFX custom promoted filters, Kling AI 1.6 LipSync, custom voice workflow to create a new unique voice closely resembling King, Magnific.ai with their masterful upscaling in the vintage shots I created, Adobe Video Premiere/AfterEffects for editing/Color Grading, and the finish from Topaz Labs to bring it to you in 4k brilliance!

Dustin Hollywood

25,952 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

VDH Pointing At Megyn Kelly Morphing Into A Zombie: “They’ve Lost Their Minds” “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead... you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn." Victor Davis Hanson, the historian and national speaker, addressed the evolving landscape of American attitudes toward Israel and antisemitism in a recent in today's episode of the Victor Davis Hanson In His Own Words, highlighting what he described as a troubling shift across the political spectrum. Hanson argued that while the Democratic Party and elements of the cultural left had long embraced antisemitic tendencies, certain voices on the right were now joining in, leaving staunch support for Israel primarily in the hands of former President Donald Trump and the MAGA base. Hanson traced the roots of the problem to the political left, noting that during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and further intensified by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, “they became anti-semitic.” In contrast, he emphasized, “It was the Republican party that stood up for Israel.”He expressed particular disappointment with figures once aligned with conservative or Republican circles who have recently voiced skepticism toward Israel. Citing Megyn Kelly as an example, Hanson recounted her public reflection: “I think I’ve been mistaken. And I might have been affected too much by people who were pro-Israel. And now I think we’ve been a little bit too hard on Islam and Netanyahu did this and Netanyahu did this.” Hanson grouped her alongside others including Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson. Of Carlson, Hanson observed that the podcaster is “very informed” and “very bright,” yet still questions strong support for Israel despite knowing key historical threats. “He knows that Roth and Johnny said that Israel was a one bomb state. One bomb could kill all the Jews. He knows what Akmanagen Akminad [Ahmadinejad] said he wanted to wipe,” Hanson stated, adding pointedly, “Why would he say it would be helpful if Iran had a bomb?” Hanson noted the absence of forceful pushback within conservative circles. “There’s no party that says, ‘How dare you?’ They’re both in on it, their bases,” he said, referring to growing tolerance for anti-Israel rhetoric on both sides. Hanson contrasted this with the unexpected defenders of Jewish communities amid rising campus harassment and demonization: “The only people now in the United States who will stand up and say, ‘No more. We’re not going to let you demonize a whole people and push them around and rough them up on campus and call them all these names’ is who? It’s Donald Trump and the MAGA base, the irredeemables, the clingers. They’re the people who are still supporting Israel. They still support Jews and evangelicals.” Hanson explicitly rejected other factions as reliable allies. “It is not the Democratic Party. It is not the podcaster right base. It is not the DEI people. It is not the bicoastal leftwing elite teachers unions,” Hanson declared. To illustrate the sudden, widespread nature of the shift, he invoked pop-culture metaphors of infection and transformation. “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead that certain people, you know, get infected and now they’re lost and they’re zombies and the other people, you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn,” he said. “Well, now they’re all turning and they’ve lost their minds.”
2:18

VDH Pointing At Megyn Kelly Morphing Into A Zombie: “They’ve Lost Their Minds” “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead... you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn." Victor Davis Hanson, the historian and national speaker, addressed the evolving landscape of American attitudes toward Israel and antisemitism in a recent in today's episode of the Victor Davis Hanson In His Own Words, highlighting what he described as a troubling shift across the political spectrum. Hanson argued that while the Democratic Party and elements of the cultural left had long embraced antisemitic tendencies, certain voices on the right were now joining in, leaving staunch support for Israel primarily in the hands of former President Donald Trump and the MAGA base. Hanson traced the roots of the problem to the political left, noting that during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and further intensified by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, “they became anti-semitic.” In contrast, he emphasized, “It was the Republican party that stood up for Israel.”He expressed particular disappointment with figures once aligned with conservative or Republican circles who have recently voiced skepticism toward Israel. Citing Megyn Kelly as an example, Hanson recounted her public reflection: “I think I’ve been mistaken. And I might have been affected too much by people who were pro-Israel. And now I think we’ve been a little bit too hard on Islam and Netanyahu did this and Netanyahu did this.” Hanson grouped her alongside others including Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson. Of Carlson, Hanson observed that the podcaster is “very informed” and “very bright,” yet still questions strong support for Israel despite knowing key historical threats. “He knows that Roth and Johnny said that Israel was a one bomb state. One bomb could kill all the Jews. He knows what Akmanagen Akminad [Ahmadinejad] said he wanted to wipe,” Hanson stated, adding pointedly, “Why would he say it would be helpful if Iran had a bomb?” Hanson noted the absence of forceful pushback within conservative circles. “There’s no party that says, ‘How dare you?’ They’re both in on it, their bases,” he said, referring to growing tolerance for anti-Israel rhetoric on both sides. Hanson contrasted this with the unexpected defenders of Jewish communities amid rising campus harassment and demonization: “The only people now in the United States who will stand up and say, ‘No more. We’re not going to let you demonize a whole people and push them around and rough them up on campus and call them all these names’ is who? It’s Donald Trump and the MAGA base, the irredeemables, the clingers. They’re the people who are still supporting Israel. They still support Jews and evangelicals.” Hanson explicitly rejected other factions as reliable allies. “It is not the Democratic Party. It is not the podcaster right base. It is not the DEI people. It is not the bicoastal leftwing elite teachers unions,” Hanson declared. To illustrate the sudden, widespread nature of the shift, he invoked pop-culture metaphors of infection and transformation. “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead that certain people, you know, get infected and now they’re lost and they’re zombies and the other people, you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn,” he said. “Well, now they’re all turning and they’ve lost their minds.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

89,759 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🛸 Vegas UFOs 🛸 Wanna support my efforts? Info. is at the end. And, as always, my comments are in ( ). "Jim Dolan (owns Sphere) and Jane Rosenthal made me an offer: 'Could you build an observatory on top of the Sphere?' Dolan is interested in finding whether there is some alien intelligence out there." ~Avi (Since I live here, this is pretty cool! It also doesn't hurt that the owner (Dolan) of my favorite basketball team (NEW YORK KNICKS), and 2nd-fav hockey team (New York Rangers) is one of the folks who helped get this started. Learn something new every day!) Dr. Avi Loeb: "This one is about Sphere in Las Vegas. As you know, it's the most impressive venue for entertainment in the world. Not only have I been [there], I've been to the top of the Sphere, which is like 120 meters high. Here you see me from inside the Sphere. This is the exosphere, by the way, it's covered with LED displays. We went all the way to the top. Why? "Because a year ago, two very distinguished visitors came to the front door of my home. By the way, lots of interesting people show up at my front door. This was Jim Dolan, who owns the Madison Square Garden, as you know, and also the Sphere, and jane rosenthal, the CEO of Tribeca Enterprises, and they made me an offer that I cannot refuse. I'm leading the Galileo Project to look for unusual objects around the Earth. And they said, 'Could you build an observatory on top of the Sphere?' "Because, you know, Jim Dolan really is interested in science, and especially in finding, you know, whether there is some alien intelligence out there. And I said, 'Of course! I will be delighted.' So that was September 2024, one year after the Sphere was opened with a concert, as you may know. I don't know if you've been there." Joe Rogan: "Yeah, I've been there for the UFC." Avi: "Yeah. UFC, exactly. So anyway, I was there just a few months ago with my research team. We went all the way to the top and installed, as you can see here, an array of infrared cameras that monitors the entire sky above Vegas, at all times. So you can see some of these images show the landscape of Vegas in the background. It's like a freckle, you know, on top of the Sphere, the exosphere, which is the biggest display on Earth. But we measured that there is not much light pollution, actually, and we can operate this observatory." (I'm surprised they measured "not much light pollution" since we all know that one nickname for Vegas is The City of Lights due to the millions of lights from the casinos on The Strip and surrounding area.) Avi: "We also put an array of visible-light cameras there, and it's operating, okay? And we hope to see a few million objects over the sky of Vegas and decide whether any of them has performance that deviates from the envelope of human-made technologies." (Absolutely nothing wrong with that. And if anybody craps on it, ask them if they're even interested in this subject.) Avi: "How do we do that? We have the Sphere as one point, but then we put two copies of that observatory ten kilometers away on a triangle. And that allows us to look at objects in the sky from different directions, just like we have two eyes so we can gage the distance. So here we have three eyes looking at the sky above Vegas, and we can tell the distance, the velocity, the acceleration of objects, and ask whether they are lying within the performance envelopes of human-made objects. And that would be amazing, it's very exciting." (It would be nice if there were people who could (allegedly) summon UAP to the Vegas area by meditating or using technology. Oh, wait... 👽 ) Avi: "I see that also as an opportunity to communicate to the public the excitement about science. That's what Jim Dolan and Jane Rosenthal really wanted to deliver. And I'm hoping that we will find something really anomalous. You know, because, as we know, the intelligence agencies are reporting to the U.S. Congress about objects they cannot identify. And, you know, that could be two things." (It can be more than two things. A few possibilities: Foreign adversaries. A human, non-state actor that has acquired a technological breakthrough. A previous human civilization that had a technological breakthrough, survived a cataclysm, and remains hidden on this planet in smaller numbers. A non-human intelligence that's based here and has always been here. A non-human intelligence from another planet. Time-traveling humans. Non-humans who exist in other dimensions that humans can't perceive with their normal senses. Aka Interdimensional or a shadow biome. Nod to Dr. Eric Davis for the latter.) ~ Avi: "They're getting, you know, the defense budget for 2026 is a trillion dollars, okay? If they tell us that with a trillion dollars, there are still objects they cannot identify above the U.S., they're not doing their job. They're not doing their job, and we should be worried." (100%. But there may be some folks in government who CAN identify some of these objects and they're keeping that information hidden for various reasons.) Avi: "Who sent these objects? Could it be adversarial nations? Okay? That's one possibility, which has to do with national security. The second possibility is that it's maybe something from outside of this Earth which would be even more significant." (Again, there are plenty of other possibilities.) Avi: "So either way, we need to figure this out. And I don't think I'm wasting my time leading the Galileo Project to figure out whether there are anomalies, you know, that go beyond human-made technologies. Because if it turns out that all the objects are human made, I will be happy to deliver the set of sensors we developed with the machine-learning software that we developed, to the Department of War 🇺🇸 so that they can employ it for national-security purposes. So my time was not wasted, as a scientist. I'm doing something useful to society." Rogan: "Of course." Avi: "The Department of War can use it. I have no problem. Everything made by humans, by the way, is boring, as far as I'm concerned. I want to see something from outside the solar system, which is not what the government should be about. The government should worry about national security, not about what lies outside the solar system. That's my job definition as an astrophysicist, okay?" (Not to sound like a broken record, but...some of what we're seeing that appears to be anomalous may be from within this solar system or, potentially, Earth-based.) Avi: "And so, I feel that this is worthy [of] pursuing, but the Galileo Project is really the first organized project that constructed a reliable set of sensors in an observatory configuration that does systematic study of the sky to collect millions of objects in the sky per year. We have three observatories, one in Las Vegas, as I mentioned. And by the way, this is the first time it's mentioned publicly, so..." Rogan: "That's amazing." Avi: "And another one in Massachusetts, and a third one in Pennsylvania. They were all funded by people who approached me and said, 'Here is the money.'" Rogan: "Let me ask you this: If it wasn't for those, how many observatories are looking for objects that are not from this Earth? Like, is that very rare?" Avi: "None." Rogan: "None?" Avi: "Well, there are some teams that are, you know, doing it, making a trip to collect some data." Rogan: "There is not constant observation?" Avi: "Of scientific-quality data? No." Rogan: "That's crazy." Avi: "That's crazy! That's what I'm saying." ~ (One of the groups that collected data was the AAWSAP/BAASS team headed up by Dr. James Lacatski. This is from my March 2024 post... Here's an excerpt from "Initial Revelations" by Lacatski, Kelleher and George Knapp. Chapter 18 Integrated Sensor Package to Detect UAP An autonomous sensor package to detect UAP for AAWSAP BAASS was developed by an engineering team located at Bigelow Aerospace. The following is a short summary of the specifications by which the BAASS engineering team began designing an autonomous sensor package. The project started at the conceptual stage with a meeting in late January 2009 and a complete operational prototype was built by August 2009. Design Goals: Device will operate unattended Autonomous data collection Survivability: weather, vandalism, critters Portable: “Two men and a truck.” Limited power No reliance on AC power Must be sized for full nighttime operations Sufficient communications May use WiFi, satellite phone, and cellular phone transmis- sions as the situation warrants Internet appliance for remote connection Short-range sensing (<20ft.) Long-range sensing (up to 5-mile planar radius, indeterminate altitude) Internal clock: GPS or network time-based COTS (Commercial Off-The_Shelf ~Joe) or very near COTS components only Reduce on-site maintenance to the minimum possible Camouflage based on geographic location Sensor Suite Visual, IR, near-IR, and UV spectra cameras Microwave band detection Radio band detection EMI detection in the electronics emission band RADAR LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) Audio Radiation (gamma, beta, alpha) Gravimeter See equipment details and illustrations in Tweets 2 and 3. ~End "IR" Excerpt~ ~ Avi: "And, by the way, I gave a briefing to the U.S. congress on May 1, 2025 and Congresswoman Rep. Anna Paulina Luna was there and she was very excited about the work we are doing. But the day before that, I visited an office in the Pentagon that is called the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office - AARO - All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office. And I asked them, 'You looked into all these unidentified objects reported in the past by military personnel. Did anything trigger your attention as something truly anonymous?' And they said, 'Not really. There are some reports by FBI agents that's really crazy stuff, but we don't have any data from instruments.'" (Here's a tweet from me about the director of AARO, Jon Kosloski, describing three, potentially, anomalous cases AARO is analyzing. ) ~ Avi: "And this is an office within the Pentagon which is funded to figure out things. And so, obviously, what they might want to do is imitate the Galileo Project that I'm leading. But you would think that it would be sort of the vested interest of government, you know, to invest in research related to that, which is what the Galileo Project is doing." Rogan: "Well, here's the thing. I would have thought it was already done." Avi: "I don't know." Rogan: "Until we're having this conversation, I can't believe that they're not monitoring the sky constantly for anomalous objects." Avi: "Well, you remember the Chinese spy balloon that was missed, right? And shot down?" Rogan: "Yes. Yeah, but that was silly." Avi: "So the thing to keep in mind, they're getting data on things in the sky, but if you don't have the right software now, with AI. If you don't have high-quality scientists, the way that the Manhattan Project employed, you might not figure out things. There is a reason why the Manhattan Project recruited the very best scientists. "So I say, put a billion dollars on this or more, bring in the best scientists in the world to figure it out. I'm funded at the level of millions of dollars through the Galileo Project. The government can do a billion... What is a billion dollars? It's a drop in the bucket for the Pentagon. But, if, you know, you should think about the potential risk from drones that are used by adversarial nations and..." (1000%. Put a billion dollars into that and also an AAWSAP-like program that is run by a PUBLIC company, and make all of their data available to us as soon as they receive it.) ~ If you appreciate what I do on Twitter/X (and my Blog and, occasional, YT), and wanna support my efforts, you can subscribe on here. Or.... Patreon - PayPal - ufojoe11@aol.com Venmo - My Patreon is simple. No hidden content and no tiers. If you DO support me, it will be much appreciated. If you can't afford it, don't think twice. I've been there and I get it. If you don't think my content is worth supporting, I still appreciate you reading and commenting on tweets, articles and videos.
8:21

🛸 Vegas UFOs 🛸 Wanna support my efforts? Info. is at the end. And, as always, my comments are in ( ). "Jim Dolan (owns Sphere) and Jane Rosenthal made me an offer: 'Could you build an observatory on top of the Sphere?' Dolan is interested in finding whether there is some alien intelligence out there." ~Avi (Since I live here, this is pretty cool! It also doesn't hurt that the owner (Dolan) of my favorite basketball team (NEW YORK KNICKS), and 2nd-fav hockey team (New York Rangers) is one of the folks who helped get this started. Learn something new every day!) Dr. Avi Loeb: "This one is about Sphere in Las Vegas. As you know, it's the most impressive venue for entertainment in the world. Not only have I been [there], I've been to the top of the Sphere, which is like 120 meters high. Here you see me from inside the Sphere. This is the exosphere, by the way, it's covered with LED displays. We went all the way to the top. Why? "Because a year ago, two very distinguished visitors came to the front door of my home. By the way, lots of interesting people show up at my front door. This was Jim Dolan, who owns the Madison Square Garden, as you know, and also the Sphere, and jane rosenthal, the CEO of Tribeca Enterprises, and they made me an offer that I cannot refuse. I'm leading the Galileo Project to look for unusual objects around the Earth. And they said, 'Could you build an observatory on top of the Sphere?' "Because, you know, Jim Dolan really is interested in science, and especially in finding, you know, whether there is some alien intelligence out there. And I said, 'Of course! I will be delighted.' So that was September 2024, one year after the Sphere was opened with a concert, as you may know. I don't know if you've been there." Joe Rogan: "Yeah, I've been there for the UFC." Avi: "Yeah. UFC, exactly. So anyway, I was there just a few months ago with my research team. We went all the way to the top and installed, as you can see here, an array of infrared cameras that monitors the entire sky above Vegas, at all times. So you can see some of these images show the landscape of Vegas in the background. It's like a freckle, you know, on top of the Sphere, the exosphere, which is the biggest display on Earth. But we measured that there is not much light pollution, actually, and we can operate this observatory." (I'm surprised they measured "not much light pollution" since we all know that one nickname for Vegas is The City of Lights due to the millions of lights from the casinos on The Strip and surrounding area.) Avi: "We also put an array of visible-light cameras there, and it's operating, okay? And we hope to see a few million objects over the sky of Vegas and decide whether any of them has performance that deviates from the envelope of human-made technologies." (Absolutely nothing wrong with that. And if anybody craps on it, ask them if they're even interested in this subject.) Avi: "How do we do that? We have the Sphere as one point, but then we put two copies of that observatory ten kilometers away on a triangle. And that allows us to look at objects in the sky from different directions, just like we have two eyes so we can gage the distance. So here we have three eyes looking at the sky above Vegas, and we can tell the distance, the velocity, the acceleration of objects, and ask whether they are lying within the performance envelopes of human-made objects. And that would be amazing, it's very exciting." (It would be nice if there were people who could (allegedly) summon UAP to the Vegas area by meditating or using technology. Oh, wait... 👽 ) Avi: "I see that also as an opportunity to communicate to the public the excitement about science. That's what Jim Dolan and Jane Rosenthal really wanted to deliver. And I'm hoping that we will find something really anomalous. You know, because, as we know, the intelligence agencies are reporting to the U.S. Congress about objects they cannot identify. And, you know, that could be two things." (It can be more than two things. A few possibilities: Foreign adversaries. A human, non-state actor that has acquired a technological breakthrough. A previous human civilization that had a technological breakthrough, survived a cataclysm, and remains hidden on this planet in smaller numbers. A non-human intelligence that's based here and has always been here. A non-human intelligence from another planet. Time-traveling humans. Non-humans who exist in other dimensions that humans can't perceive with their normal senses. Aka Interdimensional or a shadow biome. Nod to Dr. Eric Davis for the latter.) ~ Avi: "They're getting, you know, the defense budget for 2026 is a trillion dollars, okay? If they tell us that with a trillion dollars, there are still objects they cannot identify above the U.S., they're not doing their job. They're not doing their job, and we should be worried." (100%. But there may be some folks in government who CAN identify some of these objects and they're keeping that information hidden for various reasons.) Avi: "Who sent these objects? Could it be adversarial nations? Okay? That's one possibility, which has to do with national security. The second possibility is that it's maybe something from outside of this Earth which would be even more significant." (Again, there are plenty of other possibilities.) Avi: "So either way, we need to figure this out. And I don't think I'm wasting my time leading the Galileo Project to figure out whether there are anomalies, you know, that go beyond human-made technologies. Because if it turns out that all the objects are human made, I will be happy to deliver the set of sensors we developed with the machine-learning software that we developed, to the Department of War 🇺🇸 so that they can employ it for national-security purposes. So my time was not wasted, as a scientist. I'm doing something useful to society." Rogan: "Of course." Avi: "The Department of War can use it. I have no problem. Everything made by humans, by the way, is boring, as far as I'm concerned. I want to see something from outside the solar system, which is not what the government should be about. The government should worry about national security, not about what lies outside the solar system. That's my job definition as an astrophysicist, okay?" (Not to sound like a broken record, but...some of what we're seeing that appears to be anomalous may be from within this solar system or, potentially, Earth-based.) Avi: "And so, I feel that this is worthy [of] pursuing, but the Galileo Project is really the first organized project that constructed a reliable set of sensors in an observatory configuration that does systematic study of the sky to collect millions of objects in the sky per year. We have three observatories, one in Las Vegas, as I mentioned. And by the way, this is the first time it's mentioned publicly, so..." Rogan: "That's amazing." Avi: "And another one in Massachusetts, and a third one in Pennsylvania. They were all funded by people who approached me and said, 'Here is the money.'" Rogan: "Let me ask you this: If it wasn't for those, how many observatories are looking for objects that are not from this Earth? Like, is that very rare?" Avi: "None." Rogan: "None?" Avi: "Well, there are some teams that are, you know, doing it, making a trip to collect some data." Rogan: "There is not constant observation?" Avi: "Of scientific-quality data? No." Rogan: "That's crazy." Avi: "That's crazy! That's what I'm saying." ~ (One of the groups that collected data was the AAWSAP/BAASS team headed up by Dr. James Lacatski. This is from my March 2024 post... Here's an excerpt from "Initial Revelations" by Lacatski, Kelleher and George Knapp. Chapter 18 Integrated Sensor Package to Detect UAP An autonomous sensor package to detect UAP for AAWSAP BAASS was developed by an engineering team located at Bigelow Aerospace. The following is a short summary of the specifications by which the BAASS engineering team began designing an autonomous sensor package. The project started at the conceptual stage with a meeting in late January 2009 and a complete operational prototype was built by August 2009. Design Goals: Device will operate unattended Autonomous data collection Survivability: weather, vandalism, critters Portable: “Two men and a truck.” Limited power No reliance on AC power Must be sized for full nighttime operations Sufficient communications May use WiFi, satellite phone, and cellular phone transmis- sions as the situation warrants Internet appliance for remote connection Short-range sensing (<20ft.) Long-range sensing (up to 5-mile planar radius, indeterminate altitude) Internal clock: GPS or network time-based COTS (Commercial Off-The_Shelf ~Joe) or very near COTS components only Reduce on-site maintenance to the minimum possible Camouflage based on geographic location Sensor Suite Visual, IR, near-IR, and UV spectra cameras Microwave band detection Radio band detection EMI detection in the electronics emission band RADAR LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) Audio Radiation (gamma, beta, alpha) Gravimeter See equipment details and illustrations in Tweets 2 and 3. ~End "IR" Excerpt~ ~ Avi: "And, by the way, I gave a briefing to the U.S. congress on May 1, 2025 and Congresswoman Rep. Anna Paulina Luna was there and she was very excited about the work we are doing. But the day before that, I visited an office in the Pentagon that is called the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office - AARO - All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office. And I asked them, 'You looked into all these unidentified objects reported in the past by military personnel. Did anything trigger your attention as something truly anonymous?' And they said, 'Not really. There are some reports by FBI agents that's really crazy stuff, but we don't have any data from instruments.'" (Here's a tweet from me about the director of AARO, Jon Kosloski, describing three, potentially, anomalous cases AARO is analyzing. ) ~ Avi: "And this is an office within the Pentagon which is funded to figure out things. And so, obviously, what they might want to do is imitate the Galileo Project that I'm leading. But you would think that it would be sort of the vested interest of government, you know, to invest in research related to that, which is what the Galileo Project is doing." Rogan: "Well, here's the thing. I would have thought it was already done." Avi: "I don't know." Rogan: "Until we're having this conversation, I can't believe that they're not monitoring the sky constantly for anomalous objects." Avi: "Well, you remember the Chinese spy balloon that was missed, right? And shot down?" Rogan: "Yes. Yeah, but that was silly." Avi: "So the thing to keep in mind, they're getting data on things in the sky, but if you don't have the right software now, with AI. If you don't have high-quality scientists, the way that the Manhattan Project employed, you might not figure out things. There is a reason why the Manhattan Project recruited the very best scientists. "So I say, put a billion dollars on this or more, bring in the best scientists in the world to figure it out. I'm funded at the level of millions of dollars through the Galileo Project. The government can do a billion... What is a billion dollars? It's a drop in the bucket for the Pentagon. But, if, you know, you should think about the potential risk from drones that are used by adversarial nations and..." (1000%. Put a billion dollars into that and also an AAWSAP-like program that is run by a PUBLIC company, and make all of their data available to us as soon as they receive it.) ~ If you appreciate what I do on Twitter/X (and my Blog and, occasional, YT), and wanna support my efforts, you can subscribe on here. Or.... Patreon - PayPal - [email protected] Venmo - My Patreon is simple. No hidden content and no tiers. If you DO support me, it will be much appreciated. If you can't afford it, don't think twice. I've been there and I get it. If you don't think my content is worth supporting, I still appreciate you reading and commenting on tweets, articles and videos.

Joe Murgia

67,464 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

👽 Minimal, Firsthand Legacy Witnesses? 👽 (Sorry for the Debbie Downer posts but I think most people wanna hear the truth and not have smoke blown up their ass. We're all aware of folks who do that. Maybe...in the Senate, "we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program." ~Former Senate Staffer, Kirk McConnell (In August 2024, I was told the following by a contact: "I don’t think firsthand whistleblowers are on our horizon. Tons of credible sounding second hand, though. Some with decent credentials or rank, but none with particularly great (credentials or rank), however." I shared that on here but most people didn't wanna hear it. I'm lucky to have contacts who give it to me straight, with zero hype. Some hope? "I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time." ~McConnell ~~~ Kirk McConnell: "First, let me say that I'm greatly encouraged by Mr. Rep. Eric Burlison comments. He's a he's a politician. He has a way better sense of, you know, having his finger on the pulse of the Congress and the nation than I do. "I will also say that I, respectfully, don't agree with my friend Karl Nell. I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time. I think there's a lot of reasons for hope that this issue, is not gonna be in a significant down cycle. And that's what I certainly hope. As we've seen from Mr. Burlison, there is certainly a lot of energy in the house among members of the Oversight Committee, and that in itself is encouraging. "You know, I hope that what I'm about to say is not true, but I think it might be, and I definitely feel that this is maybe the case in the Senate: That maybe we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program. Looking back on history, my sense is that Congress undertakes these really historically important investigations when it is broadly clear that there's a there there and they know kind of what the outcome [will] be, at least in its broad strokes. "You know, you think about Watergate, the Church/Pike committees, Iran Contra, all of these are examples where Congress was finally moved to not take no for an answer and to just go full-speed and full-depth into exhaustive investigations when they knew that it had to be done, and that there was a pony at the end, you know, there was something very significant at the end of the process. "So, I have been getting this feedback as well from folks I've worked with in the Senate, that there needs to be more firsthand witnesses. And how do you encourage that? I think we also hear that there's quite a number of other people out there that could come forward. Their concern, though, is, as we've seen, they feel that there's not, by any means, sufficient whistleblower protections, and that despite the existence of protections in the law on paper, that really doesn't get at the problem. And that they're fearful of losing their careers, their security clearances, which translates into their careers, and that they're gonna suffer immense, legal expenses and perhaps legal jeopardy. So I think whistleblower protection is extremely important. "That said, it's really hard to get whistleblower protections passed in Congress. And so you have a kind of Catch-22, and I think that's the kind of problem that needs to be overcome, incrementally. So, I also would say that it's obvious that Congress is heavily influenced by public opinion, of course, and it's really important to keep up the pressure. But that in turn, you know, the public is motivated by what they see in the news and what they hear about from from experts, and therefore, you know, that's another dependency here, "But on that score, you know one of our panelists here, Dr. Anna Brady-Estevez, I loved when she, with a bright smile on her face, has said repeatedly that, in a sense, disclosure has already happened, or is certainly happening. A significant fraction of the population believes that we are being visited by non-human intelligence and that this belief is only likely to grow. The scientific community is much more friendly to this issue than in the past. "I would also say that the NHI itself gets a vote here, and they drive a lot of this. How much interaction are they going to....how much are they going to expose what they're doing and what they're doing here? And yet, at the same time, we've got an awful lot of people out there now with the ability to, and the interest in, detecting and tracking and trying to document what is happening out there. You think about efforts like the Galileo Project, Garry P. Nolan at the The Sol Foundation and Stanford, Beatriz Villarroel and the astrophysics community, and many others are tracking fundamental aspects of this problem. And a number of scientists and engineers working on new physics concepts to explain UAP characteristics and behavior is unprecedented. You know, you think about Skywatcher as another example of a private initiative. "There's also the experiencer community, you know, the people who have had actual direct interactions, and certainly a large number of folks who report abduction experiences, who retain the ability to communicate with NHI. This can be used, and is very likely to be used or exploited to gain insight into physics and intentions and so forth. "So, I'm actually on the optimistic side. I think with work and perseverance of groups like this, we can continue to amp up the interest and the pressure on the part of the American people, and that will translate into action by the government."
6:54

👽 Minimal, Firsthand Legacy Witnesses? 👽 (Sorry for the Debbie Downer posts but I think most people wanna hear the truth and not have smoke blown up their ass. We're all aware of folks who do that. Maybe...in the Senate, "we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program." ~Former Senate Staffer, Kirk McConnell (In August 2024, I was told the following by a contact: "I don’t think firsthand whistleblowers are on our horizon. Tons of credible sounding second hand, though. Some with decent credentials or rank, but none with particularly great (credentials or rank), however." I shared that on here but most people didn't wanna hear it. I'm lucky to have contacts who give it to me straight, with zero hype. Some hope? "I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time." ~McConnell ~~~ Kirk McConnell: "First, let me say that I'm greatly encouraged by Mr. Rep. Eric Burlison comments. He's a he's a politician. He has a way better sense of, you know, having his finger on the pulse of the Congress and the nation than I do. "I will also say that I, respectfully, don't agree with my friend Karl Nell. I don't think that we have to be so discouraged by the defeat of the UAPDA for the third time. I think there's a lot of reasons for hope that this issue, is not gonna be in a significant down cycle. And that's what I certainly hope. As we've seen from Mr. Burlison, there is certainly a lot of energy in the house among members of the Oversight Committee, and that in itself is encouraging. "You know, I hope that what I'm about to say is not true, but I think it might be, and I definitely feel that this is maybe the case in the Senate: That maybe we have a problem that there's not been quite enough of what members in the Senate would say are firsthand sources with direct involvement in the Legacy program. Looking back on history, my sense is that Congress undertakes these really historically important investigations when it is broadly clear that there's a there there and they know kind of what the outcome [will] be, at least in its broad strokes. "You know, you think about Watergate, the Church/Pike committees, Iran Contra, all of these are examples where Congress was finally moved to not take no for an answer and to just go full-speed and full-depth into exhaustive investigations when they knew that it had to be done, and that there was a pony at the end, you know, there was something very significant at the end of the process. "So, I have been getting this feedback as well from folks I've worked with in the Senate, that there needs to be more firsthand witnesses. And how do you encourage that? I think we also hear that there's quite a number of other people out there that could come forward. Their concern, though, is, as we've seen, they feel that there's not, by any means, sufficient whistleblower protections, and that despite the existence of protections in the law on paper, that really doesn't get at the problem. And that they're fearful of losing their careers, their security clearances, which translates into their careers, and that they're gonna suffer immense, legal expenses and perhaps legal jeopardy. So I think whistleblower protection is extremely important. "That said, it's really hard to get whistleblower protections passed in Congress. And so you have a kind of Catch-22, and I think that's the kind of problem that needs to be overcome, incrementally. So, I also would say that it's obvious that Congress is heavily influenced by public opinion, of course, and it's really important to keep up the pressure. But that in turn, you know, the public is motivated by what they see in the news and what they hear about from from experts, and therefore, you know, that's another dependency here, "But on that score, you know one of our panelists here, Dr. Anna Brady-Estevez, I loved when she, with a bright smile on her face, has said repeatedly that, in a sense, disclosure has already happened, or is certainly happening. A significant fraction of the population believes that we are being visited by non-human intelligence and that this belief is only likely to grow. The scientific community is much more friendly to this issue than in the past. "I would also say that the NHI itself gets a vote here, and they drive a lot of this. How much interaction are they going to....how much are they going to expose what they're doing and what they're doing here? And yet, at the same time, we've got an awful lot of people out there now with the ability to, and the interest in, detecting and tracking and trying to document what is happening out there. You think about efforts like the Galileo Project, Garry P. Nolan at the The Sol Foundation and Stanford, Beatriz Villarroel and the astrophysics community, and many others are tracking fundamental aspects of this problem. And a number of scientists and engineers working on new physics concepts to explain UAP characteristics and behavior is unprecedented. You know, you think about Skywatcher as another example of a private initiative. "There's also the experiencer community, you know, the people who have had actual direct interactions, and certainly a large number of folks who report abduction experiences, who retain the ability to communicate with NHI. This can be used, and is very likely to be used or exploited to gain insight into physics and intentions and so forth. "So, I'm actually on the optimistic side. I think with work and perseverance of groups like this, we can continue to amp up the interest and the pressure on the part of the American people, and that will translate into action by the government."

Joe Murgia

38,924 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Now, let me take a moment to express how much I love, respect, and admire Becky. She is an extraordinary person, not only immensely talented but also incredibly kind, hardworking, and genuine. Watching her grow and succeed has been truly inspiring. From her acting to her confidence, her determination to her grace, she continues to amaze me with every project she takes on. I am so proud of all that she has accomplished and the light she brings to the world. Her ability to face challenges with strength while staying true to herself is something I deeply admire. Becky, you are an incredible role model and a beautiful soul, and I will always be here to cheer you on. 💖 Moving on! 😁 Let’s take a moment to appreciate that #FreenBecky, honestly, are a flawless duo. If you disagree, well, I hate to break it to you, but that’s just delusion speaking. Facts are facts, whether you like it or not! 🤷🏻‍♀️ Take a moment to consider that Becky’s name is part of FreenBECKY. They are recognized because of that, went global because of that, and, as a result, have been able to take on many more solo projects while also gaining even more recognition both individually and as a CP. How can you claim to care about Becky while constantly tearing her down? If you truly support her, it means embracing all aspects of her life, who she is, who she chooses to be with, and the people she collaborates with or considers her friends. It’s disheartening to see these so-called 'fans' trying to control her life. They undermine her, disrespect her, and throw insults with no regard for her feelings or well-being. Such people don’t deserve to be called fans. And let’s be honest, it’s not just one group at fault. While BTSS often take the blame, FTSS isn’t innocent either. Both groups contribute to the toxicity, and it’s truly disgusting to witness. Becky and Freen deserve nothing but peace, love, and joy in their lives. 🤍 If you don't love the other, at least show them the RESPECT they deserve... nobody told you to like them but at least show them the respect they deserve. 🫵 If you genuinely care about your favorite, show it by respecting and appreciating the person who brings light into her life, even if that person isn’t your favorite. You don’t have to like or love them, but at the very least, stop the childish behavior and let them live in peace. Grow up, touch some grass, and leave them alone. True fans prioritize the happiness and well-being of the person they admire. This means accepting relationships or collaborations that may not align with your personal preferences. Targeting someone with insults, whether it’s her co-workers or friends, isn’t just disrespectful; it’s harmful and likely takes a toll on both Becky and Freen. As fans, our role is simple: uplift and support. Becky and Freen have openly shared how much joy and calm they bring to each other’s lives, and if you genuinely support them, that happiness should matter to you too. Speaking to BTSS: If you’re not here for Becky’s happiness or to support her unconditionally, whether it's solo or CP work, then why are you still here? Save us all the trouble and leave, preferably while letting the door hit you on the way out. 😒 At the end of the day, all I want is for Becky to be happy. Seeing her smile genuinely, with that sparkle in her eyes that lights up everything around her, that’s all I need. And it’s clear that being with Freen brings her that joy. :🤍) Whatever their relationship may be, I sincerely hope they remain by each other’s sides for years to come. Becky’s happiness is what matters most, and knowing she has someone like Freen, along with her family, who brings that out in her, fills my heart with nothing but love. :) 👩🏻‍🤝‍👩🏼 P.S: videos used are not mine.. I'm not an expert at video editing, but I just wanted to compile a few moments to show their memories and happiness together. Try not to smile while watching the video btw 😁 and the ending 💅😌 #beckysangels #srchafreen #ฟรีนเบค
23:29

Now, let me take a moment to express how much I love, respect, and admire Becky. She is an extraordinary person, not only immensely talented but also incredibly kind, hardworking, and genuine. Watching her grow and succeed has been truly inspiring. From her acting to her confidence, her determination to her grace, she continues to amaze me with every project she takes on. I am so proud of all that she has accomplished and the light she brings to the world. Her ability to face challenges with strength while staying true to herself is something I deeply admire. Becky, you are an incredible role model and a beautiful soul, and I will always be here to cheer you on. 💖 Moving on! 😁 Let’s take a moment to appreciate that #FreenBecky, honestly, are a flawless duo. If you disagree, well, I hate to break it to you, but that’s just delusion speaking. Facts are facts, whether you like it or not! 🤷🏻‍♀️ Take a moment to consider that Becky’s name is part of FreenBECKY. They are recognized because of that, went global because of that, and, as a result, have been able to take on many more solo projects while also gaining even more recognition both individually and as a CP. How can you claim to care about Becky while constantly tearing her down? If you truly support her, it means embracing all aspects of her life, who she is, who she chooses to be with, and the people she collaborates with or considers her friends. It’s disheartening to see these so-called 'fans' trying to control her life. They undermine her, disrespect her, and throw insults with no regard for her feelings or well-being. Such people don’t deserve to be called fans. And let’s be honest, it’s not just one group at fault. While BTSS often take the blame, FTSS isn’t innocent either. Both groups contribute to the toxicity, and it’s truly disgusting to witness. Becky and Freen deserve nothing but peace, love, and joy in their lives. 🤍 If you don't love the other, at least show them the RESPECT they deserve... nobody told you to like them but at least show them the respect they deserve. 🫵 If you genuinely care about your favorite, show it by respecting and appreciating the person who brings light into her life, even if that person isn’t your favorite. You don’t have to like or love them, but at the very least, stop the childish behavior and let them live in peace. Grow up, touch some grass, and leave them alone. True fans prioritize the happiness and well-being of the person they admire. This means accepting relationships or collaborations that may not align with your personal preferences. Targeting someone with insults, whether it’s her co-workers or friends, isn’t just disrespectful; it’s harmful and likely takes a toll on both Becky and Freen. As fans, our role is simple: uplift and support. Becky and Freen have openly shared how much joy and calm they bring to each other’s lives, and if you genuinely support them, that happiness should matter to you too. Speaking to BTSS: If you’re not here for Becky’s happiness or to support her unconditionally, whether it's solo or CP work, then why are you still here? Save us all the trouble and leave, preferably while letting the door hit you on the way out. 😒 At the end of the day, all I want is for Becky to be happy. Seeing her smile genuinely, with that sparkle in her eyes that lights up everything around her, that’s all I need. And it’s clear that being with Freen brings her that joy. :🤍) Whatever their relationship may be, I sincerely hope they remain by each other’s sides for years to come. Becky’s happiness is what matters most, and knowing she has someone like Freen, along with her family, who brings that out in her, fills my heart with nothing but love. :) 👩🏻‍🤝‍👩🏼 P.S: videos used are not mine.. I'm not an expert at video editing, but I just wanted to compile a few moments to show their memories and happiness together. Try not to smile while watching the video btw 😁 and the ending 💅😌 #beckysangels #srchafreen #ฟรีนเบค

𝘽𝙚𝙘𝙠𝙮'𝙨 𝙒𝙞𝙛𝙚𝙮 🪽🌷

47,064 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr