Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

PVP CATCH 347 MAKE BETTER DECISIONS.... #longbeach #california #tcap #tocatchapredator #protectourkids #forthekids #caught #caughtoncamera #predator

10 Yorum

People v. Preds profil fotoğrafı
People v. Preds2 yıl önce

Jonathan admits to wanting his sexual victims to be as young as the age of FOUR or FIVE years old!

People v. Preds profil fotoğrafı
People v. Preds2 yıl önce

Imagine being a judge and releasing this guy on his "Own Recognizance" which means just simply released to return for his next court date. Freed to the wild.....

Super Fun Ball 🌎❌ profil fotoğrafı
Super Fun Ball 🌎❌2 yıl önce

One less Biden voter on the streets

Fruey profil fotoğrafı
Fruey2 yıl önce

Did this dude get locked up?

People v. Preds profil fotoğrafı
People v. Preds2 yıl önce

Currently in custody.

People v. Preds profil fotoğrafı
People v. Preds2 yıl önce

If you would like to support us and keep us going, consider becoming a member and see the full video early!

Michael profil fotoğrafı
Michael2 yıl önce

Thank you for getting this guy off the streets.

Southern FFA Family profil fotoğrafı
Southern FFA Family2 yıl önce

Every State needs to go to Capital Punishment for crimes against children.

People v. Preds profil fotoğrafı
People v. Preds2 yıl önce

FULL VIDEO HERE:

Charlie @ Hellraiser profil fotoğrafı
Charlie @ Hellraiser2 yıl önce

He looks like he needs to experience severe Brain Damage, slowly.

Benzer Videolar

How I Build My Teams I always liked the idea of ‘possession football’: - Control the game. - A tool to develop players. - The opponent can’t score without the ball. But I built it the wrong way: “Keep the ball. Find a gap to attack.” This turned into “side-to-side” passing. It was boring and ineffective. \ The idea. So, I flipped the idea: Instead of controlling to attack, we attack to control. Play as vertical as possible (while maintaining control). If not possible, pass back. Avoid sideways passes. For better connections and counter-press, we use a vertical, narrow structure: These simple decisions lead to short, vertical, and diagonal passes. This is what I call 'vertical possession' football. \ Make it work. The idea is simple. The execution is not. Over the years, I’ve worked to close the gap between vision and reality. (watch example below) My goal is to get closer to my vision every day. But as Vince Lombardi said: “Perfection is unattainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.” Here’s my plan to 'catch excellence': 1. Build it my way. Ignore opinions. Opinions lead to conformity. We reduce our philosophy to its essence—and build from there. Everything else is a distraction. 2. Stick to it. We limit ourselves to core principles, and stick to them. When there’s a problem, we don’t change the idea—we improve its execution. 3. Eliminate waste. Building a style of play is like carving a statue. You start with a block of marble and chip away everything unnecessary. All that’s left is the sculpture. We do the same. We cut every unnecessary touch and step: - Fewer touches mean we need less time and space. We have more space to be creative. - The simpler it gets, the more recognizable the style. 4. Obsess over the players. We don’t adapt to opponents. We focus on our players. That's what matters in the long run. When our ideas work, we can compete against anyone. 5. Develop technical and creative players as a by-product. - Possession: Many touches to refine technique. - Vertical: No “easy” sideways passes. Learn to play in tight spaces. - Control: Avoid hectic football. Control the ball to make deliberate decisions. 6. One Training Structure. We compress our philosophy into one structure. Then, we repeat it every session. We make our style of play a habit. And we develop the tools to execute it. 7. Master a Few Exercises. We repeat a small set of core games over and over. We focus on improving execution, not on new drills. The better we execute, the faster we get to our vision. 8. Bottleneck Coaching. We can’t predict what happens, so we don’t over-plan. Instead, we prepare for what might happen. This liberates our coaching: Rather than sticking to pre-planned coaching points, we solve the most critical issue—the bottleneck. 9. Competition Drives Development. Games are the core of our training. Players compete to win. They force each other to get better and better, session after session. 10. Positive Team Culture. I used to react with anger when things didn’t go right. And yes, it can work in the short term. But to build something great, players must stay on the path for a long time. This is more likely when they enjoy the process. Positive reinforcement is harder to do, but more sustainable. \ What's next? That's the plan. Now, it’s all about execution. I'll keep you updated.

Bene Schneiderbauer

59,810 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Howard Hawks on the reason why he made "Rio Bravo" (1959) "'Rio Bravo' (1959) was made because I didn’t like a picture called 'High Noon' (1952). I saw 'High Noon' at about the same time I saw another western picture, and we were talking about western pictures, and they asked me if I liked it, and I said, “Not particularly.” I didn’t think a good sheriff was going to go running around town like a chicken with his head off asking for help, and finally his Quaker wife had to save him. That isn’t my idea of a good west ern sheriff. I said that a good sheriff would turn around and say, “How good are you? Are you good enough to take the best man they’ve got?” The fellow would probably say no, and he’d say, “Well, then I’d just have to take care of you.” And that scene was in 'Rio Bravo'. Then I said I saw another picture where the sheriff caught a prisoner, and the prisoner taunted him and made him perspire and worry and everything by saying, “Wait till my friends catch up with you.” And I said, “That’s a lot of non sense, the sheriff would say, ‘You better hope your friends don’t catch up with you, ’cause you’ll be the first man to die.’” While we were doing all this, they said, “Why don’t you make a picture the other way?” And I said, “OK,” and we made 'Rio Bravo' the exact opposite from High Noon and this other picture, I think it was called '3:10 to Yuma' (1957)." ("Hawks on Hawks", Joseph McBride, 1982) P.S: On this day, 67 years ago, "Rio Bravo" (1959) premiered in Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.

DepressedBergman

220,814 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨New Protest Rules Go Live Today — Anarchists Poised to Take Advantage, Police Say Today, the NYPD was officially shackled by a court settlement that critics say will leave the city more vulnerable the next time protests erupt. Phase II of the Payne settlement has gone into effect, and police warn it’s a recipe for disaster. The deal forces cops into a rigid “tiered” protest response system, bans effective crowd-control tactics like kettling, and puts new oversight units over every move the department makes. Instead of trusting trained officers to make split-second decisions in the street, commanders now have to wade through layers of red tape and sign-offs before they can act. Police sources tell me this is exactly what agitators want: more time and space to provoke confrontations, attack officers, and damage property. “This just delays everything,” one source said. “By the time we’re allowed to step in, the chaos is already underway.” The NYC PBA has blasted the settlement as “dangerous and misguided,” warning that it ties officers’ hands and leaves the public exposed. They argue the new rules will leave cops in a “catch-up” role — reacting after anarchists or rioters have already escalated. For years, I’ve documented protests across the city. Not all protesters are violent — but it’s always the same small groups of anarchists who hijack otherwise peaceful demonstrations, target the police, and light the fuse for violence. Under these new rules, the NYPD will be forced to stand back while those agitators get the upper hand. Peaceful demonstrators will still get caught in the mix, only now officers are restricted in how fast they can respond. Business owners and community leaders are just as concerned. With limits on police presence, many fear looting and vandalism will spiral before cops are even cleared to move. “It emboldens the worst actors,” another police source told me. “They know we’re boxed in.” The city may call this reform, but to officers on the ground it looks like surrender. The new settlement doesn’t protect New Yorkers — it protects agitators By Leeroy Johnson . For licensing email [email protected]

Viral News NYC

31,643 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

BREAKING: GPT-5.6 Sol is out—AND Codex has been merged into ChatGPT Desktop as ChatGPT Codex. This combo model and desktop app harness are the gold-standard for knowledge work in AI. 5.6 is powerful, fast, half the price of Fable, and my default for almost everything. We’ve been testing it internally Every 🪨 for about a month across coding, writing, design, and knowledge work. Here’s our day-zero vibe check: - An A-tier coder—but it’s not Fable. Sol scored 56/100 on our Senior Engineer benchmark compared to a 91 for Fable. I think the 56/100 undersells it, it's an excellent implementor, and very smart. But Fable just writes conceptually cleaner code and works better at the top end of task complexity. PRO-TIP: Use GPT-5.6 as Fable's subagent for the most goated combo in AI coding. - The best writer of the frontier models. It’s clearer and more concise than Fable or Opus 4.8, without the overexplaining or weird private language. It can one-shot marketing emails, help you workshop taglines, and explain complex concepts clearly. It's also super fast, which makes it easy to collaborate with. - Design is better, but not top-tier. It has noticeably more taste than 5.5, but Fable and Opus 4.8 are still playing at a different level. See examples in the video and vibe check below. - The real leap is knowledge work. Sol is the first model I’ve trusted to run whole loops of knowledge work—not just help with individual tasks. I use it to process email, surface decisions from meetings and Slack, find job candidates, scan Facebook Marketplace for furniture, and log my meals. It has shifted my job from doing the work to tending the system that does it. - The merged app is fine. I was extremely worried about this because I love the Codex app. OpenAI was caught in an interesting position: How to make an agent orchestration app for regular ChatGPT consumers, coders, and businesses all in one app. They now split the interface between ChatGPT Work and ChatGPT Codex. They're basically the same except Work hides code. And "Chat" has been demoted to 2nd tier status for quick questions in either one. It's not a big leap, but it's not a huge setback either. And it remains my favorite of the desktop agent orchestration apps. Verdict: If I really had to put my finger on it, I'd say Fable has way more big model smell. But that means it's a skill in itself to get value out of it—99% of people are still not there yet. GPT-5.6 is almost as powerful, but is easy to use, fast, and relatively cheap. It should give you an early sense of where model work is going. Full Every 🪨 Vibe Check:

Dan Shipper 📧

145,911 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#Euphoria #Season3Episode3 “You love who you love” Contrary to popular belief, Nate truly seems to love Cassie and accepts her with all her crazy antics. In this clip, she publicly humiliates him but he still tries to placate her. Yes, this doesn’t seem like the Nate we knew, but isn’t he? He wanted to be loved but his dynamic with Cal was so toxic, he felt unlovable. Lashed out in anger for lack of expression otherwise. Maddy’s feisty ways did nothing to nurture the broken child in him. They had a horrible relationship because neither could heal the other’s real wounds. Both he and Cassie betrayed their best friends and seemed to find something in each other that made them feel loved. As broken and flawed their story might be, as Nate tells Jules “you love who you love”. We had plenty of hints that the night of this incredible wedding party was going to end in total chaos. Nate is caught between a rock and a hard place. He truly wants to build an honest life, but as an entrepreneur myself, I fully empathize with his business struggles and the financial hole he is in. He has to maintain a mask of competence so that he doesn’t lose investor confidence in the business. Bureaucratic shenanigans in real estate coupled with high interest rates, especially in California where building codes are increasingly debilitating, have led to many bankruptcies and foreclosures in the construction business. An endangered flower like the white fritillaries in a construction zone can bring a project to a grinding halt, putting jobs, livelihoods and businesses at risk. The balance between conservation and progress in California is reaching unhealthy proportions. Nate’s business woes are not rooted in him wanting to con people. And yet, he now has to face the consequences of this thin line he has been walking to maintain investor confidence versus cutting visible corners so he could better manage his costs. Cassie refused to understand this and so he caved to her demands and puts on a more lavish wedding than he could afford. The cinematic choice of Nate getting beaten to a pulp while she wails about her bloody nose is such a typical “Crazy Cassie” thing to do! The key is in what Naz tells her: “Some women inherit wealth but other inherit debt”. Watch her turn to Alamo/Silver Slippers so that she is truly next to Nate for “richer or poorer”. Regardless of her melodrama about not wanting to be poor (thanks to her mother’s incessant poisoning of the well), Cassie’s biggest desire in life is to be loved. And for better or for worse, Cassie & Nate have taken the vows to be there for each other. I predict she goes out into the world to make money in ways she knows how, to service this debt she’s inherited as Mrs. Jacobs. I know Jacob and Sydney will push the limits of their characters caught in these ludicrous scenarios. I am seated for this! Maddy’s uncomfortable presence at the wedding, Marsha’s jabs at her, her witnessing the love Nate & Cassie seem to have for each other, are beautifully and painfully captured by Alexa. She truly owns her role as Maddy, who is a pro at faking it till she makes it. She’s hurt by the life she didn’t get but she should feel blessed about making an honest living where she stands on her own. Being rich is a nice aspiration but sometimes the prices to be paid are too high. Nate is now dismembered from the desire to maintain their affluent status. Jules’ plot is tragic. The character who seems to have the most sense of self in high school, who whole heartedly and unapologetically embraced her queerness, is now a walking shell with no sense of integrity. It will be interesting to see what Sam imagines for her to reclaim herself again. Rue navigating this new world of crime is a challenging role for Zendaya she’s knocking out of the ball park. I know she’s just getting started. Looking forward to more of her sassy, gender bending antics as her plot unfolds. Loving this season!!

mh-Musings

116,105 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

WTF is OP_NET and WTF is If you’re looking for a REAL OPPORTUNITY during this cycle, then check this out👇 OP_NET (OP_NET) is a groundbreaking metaprotocol that brings advanced smart contract functionality to Bitcoin, overcoming the limitations of previous Bitcoin-based protocols like Ordinals and BRC-20. It leverages Tapscript and a custom virtual machine (OP_VM) to enable complex decentralized applications (dApps), DeFi, and NFTs directly on the Bitcoin, all while using Bitcoin as gas! This combination of programmability + unparalleled security and decentralization presents a UNIQUE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY on Bitcoin. OP_NET has the potential to unlock significant amount of value ($1.3T+) by enabling the first fully programmable layer on the world's most secure blockchain. This means early investors in projects built on OP_NET, like could be in for a WILD ride in the next 12 months! So, WTF is is basically but on Bitcoin. It's easy: create your token-->complete the bonding curve-->have a liquidity pool automatically deployed on (at no cost to you!). Now, we know what you're thinking: "isn't Bitcoin like super slow?" Yeah, it is. Enter: "SlowFi." In case you haven’t heard, SlowFi, is the term people are using to describe the DeFi experience on Bitcoin, where you’ll likely be waiting around 10 minutes for transaction to settle. Here’s the twist, though: this slower pace isn’t a bug—it’s a feature! With more time to think, strategize, and plan your moves, you’re less likely to get caught up in the frantic FOMO that can lead to bad decisions. The slower transaction times give you a better shot at hitting those sweet spots on bonding curves, making it easier to see those curves through to completion. Less volatility = more orderly progress through the curve. This can make it easier for the bonding curve to reach its completion point, as participants have a clearer understanding of price trajectories. SlowFi Sounds Cool But I'm a Fast-Paced Degen, What Can Offer Me? We get it. Not everyone’s cut out for the deliberate, methodical world of SlowFi. If you’re itching for that fast-paced, adrenaline-fueled trading environment, no worries. We got you! will also be launching on Fractal (Fractal Bitcoin), Unisat's Bitcoin sidechain, which is designed for speed and agility (30 sec block times). So, if SlowFi sounds a bit boring to you, just flip the switch on the dashboard and head over to our Fractal iteration where you'll be able to play FAST! The Last Thing We'll Say is This👇 The real reason to get excited about is simple. Whether you’re playing on SlowFi or tearing it up on Fractal, $FUN token stakers are in for a treat. We’ll be sharing our platform's revenue directly with our stakers, meaning every transaction, every trade, every time someone dives into a bonding curve, stakers are getting their cut. This isn’t just about earning tokens; it’s about being a part of our success and growing your stack along with us! It’s a win-win, or better yet, its a fun-fun! 😀 Bitcoin season 2 (SlowFi season) is COMING! Make sure to check out some of the other projects leading the way: SLOHM Finance Stash UNGA (OP_NET) Pepe (OP_NET) Take the orange pill and let's play!!! 💊💊💊

op.fun (OP_NET)

16,418 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Hey Lisa! (can’t tag bc I’m blocked for some reason /: ) - you’re both wrong! Here are a few suggestions to help make you a better fact finder in the future along with clarifications on our current funding arrangement with Israel First, you tweeted underneath your own post about how we should be more worried about CAIR than AIPAC. I just wanted to politely point out that you’re literally using “CAIR California” as a source around the 1:30 mark. AI summaries are typically deficient and mostly unconvincing - pulling your supporting evidence independently, rather than from AI sources, might help you avoid getting caught in a kerfuffle like this one, and increase your accuracy (and social media reach) going forward More importantly - transparency is an imperative part of reporting. The foreign assistance website makes very clear that both FY25 and FY26 reflect incomplete datasets. It’s not that we “only sent Israel $89k” - FY26 simply hasn’t finished yet. As you mentioned, federal fiscal year starts in October and runs to Sept 30 the following year. FY26 ends at the end of next month and has not been fully reported FY24 is complete and it shows that we provided Israel with $6.8B total. FY25 reporting is not complete, but you can see the disbursement total currently shows $3.3B . That number will certainly change to at least $3.8B If you had done actual research on the subject, you would know we are obligated to provide Israel with, at minimum, $3.8B every year until 2028. This has been the baseline number since we renewed our MOU in 2016. You can find those details here: You can reference the full FY26 budget request here, which includes $3.3B of that baseline and was enacted into law earlier this year as part of a bill: Cumulatively, Israel has been the top recipient of foreign aid since it was founded at ~$300+ billion total US tax dollars Aside from a 2yr period where Ukraine received buku funding, your claim that we provide other countries with “much more aid” is incorrect. The only two other countries besides Israel that have a guaranteed baseline of annual aid are Egypt and Jordan - and their budgets are not even close. Ironically, that money inadvertently ends up supporting Israel by guaranteeing their safety; we’ve essentially been paying off their neighbors since 1979 and 1994, respectively, under the guise of peace treaties Hope that helps!

daisy 🌼

50,441 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce