Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

"PYUSD has been a failure from a distribution perspective because PayPal didn't choose to make it succeed" Austin Campbell on how PayPal squandered its stablecoin advantage "You have a platform where you're holding an immense amount of user funds, you have them on your legacy ledger, and had you... show more

Laura Shin

291,603 subscribers

19,433 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Robinhood appears to be doing what PayPal probably should have done, which is take every single user they can get their hands on and offer them USDG" Austin Campbell on why USDG with Robinhood is a test case the stablecoin space hasn't seen "USDG is going to be a fascinating test case of what happens if you show up with your own installed user base in the first place. Because Circle, as we know, is not really deeply retail facing, they use Coinbase for that, that's been a majority of their distribution" "USDG just showed up with a small company that has a handful of users called Robinhood attached to it, and I think that is a game we have not seen played in the stablecoin space before, a company coming with a large user base and pushing stablecoins to those users"

"Robinhood appears to be doing what PayPal probably should have done, which is take every single user they can get their hands on and offer them USDG" Austin Campbell on why USDG with Robinhood is a test case the stablecoin space hasn't seen "USDG is going to be a fascinating test case of what happens if you show up with your own installed user base in the first place. Because Circle, as we know, is not really deeply retail facing, they use Coinbase for that, that's been a majority of their distribution" "USDG just showed up with a small company that has a handful of users called Robinhood attached to it, and I think that is a game we have not seen played in the stablecoin space before, a company coming with a large user base and pushing stablecoins to those users"

Laura Shin

19,531 views • 1 month ago

🚨Hurricane Helene victim SLAMS the local and federal government. “It’s weird to me that some 50-some-odd-year-old guy, in the middle of a disaster, has to reach out to the American government to explain to them, ‘Hey, you have resources. You have people who want to help, and you really do have the capacity to do it. Uncle Sam, you can do it.’ This is despicable. Joe, Kamala, do you know you have a military? Do you know that we have spent trillions of dollars on it, and that we can, at the drop of a hat, invade any country in the world, flatten them, and rebuild them? We’ve done it lots of times. Read a history book. Why can’t you use those same resources that we’ve already paid for, here, now? Where are you? I understand there was a vacation you needed to take, Joe, and Kamala, you had some fundraising for your campaign. Suspend that shit and get in here!”

🚨Hurricane Helene victim SLAMS the local and federal government. “It’s weird to me that some 50-some-odd-year-old guy, in the middle of a disaster, has to reach out to the American government to explain to them, ‘Hey, you have resources. You have people who want to help, and you really do have the capacity to do it. Uncle Sam, you can do it.’ This is despicable. Joe, Kamala, do you know you have a military? Do you know that we have spent trillions of dollars on it, and that we can, at the drop of a hat, invade any country in the world, flatten them, and rebuild them? We’ve done it lots of times. Read a history book. Why can’t you use those same resources that we’ve already paid for, here, now? Where are you? I understand there was a vacation you needed to take, Joe, and Kamala, you had some fundraising for your campaign. Suspend that shit and get in here!”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

146,561 views • 1 year ago

Asmongold warns against treating political opponents as good faith actors "I've said it a million times and I'll say it a million more. These people don't have any values. They just simply have goals." "If you treat them as people with values and you capitulate to having a moral or ethical understanding with them, the only reason they want that is so they can take advantage of you. It's so they can subvert you or use that value against you." "To the extent that you find yourself on the same side as them, you should be asking yourself why. You can never have shared values with these people. If it was up to them, you'd be in jail."

Asmongold warns against treating political opponents as good faith actors "I've said it a million times and I'll say it a million more. These people don't have any values. They just simply have goals." "If you treat them as people with values and you capitulate to having a moral or ethical understanding with them, the only reason they want that is so they can take advantage of you. It's so they can subvert you or use that value against you." "To the extent that you find yourself on the same side as them, you should be asking yourself why. You can never have shared values with these people. If it was up to them, you'd be in jail."

Asmongold Updates

17,340 views • 19 days ago

🚨 Incredible Greg Gutfeld monologue on Elon Musk: Musk is changing the world and these bureaucrats think they can get him to shut up, but they cant, and that drives them crazy because he embraces the call for adventure -- which is the complete opposite of a bureaucrat. A bureaucrat exists purely to seek comfort. Building a padded world around him without achieving a thing. Once a bureaucrat is born, its only goal is to feather its nest before it dies. But Musk is the enemy of comfort. Which is weird for a billionaire. In fact, it makes being a billionaire the least interesting thing about him. He realizes that becoming comfortable with life makes you a menace to everyone else, because when you have no challenges you use that time to infringe on others, like a bureaucrat. Do bureaucrats ever learn from failure? No. They avoid failure by avoiding everything -- everything worthwhile. So when they see someone who chases a challenge, they resent him. They've given up on their dreams, so they expect you to do the same. For Musk, its about failure more than success. Failure becomes the next challenge which becomes the next opportunity which leads to wisdom. Compare that to those who despise him. They say it's over political beliefs but its far deeper. They don't have faith in themselves and they hate those who do. Now they could be inspired by him, but its easier to envy him and become an obstacle to the achievement of others. But look -- you don't need to agree with him. It's a free country. You have the right to talk back to him or anybody else. But when you try to stifle scientific progress because you hate a candidate, you're not the good guys. Maybe it should be you we're launching into space. 👏👏👏

🚨 Incredible Greg Gutfeld monologue on Elon Musk: Musk is changing the world and these bureaucrats think they can get him to shut up, but they cant, and that drives them crazy because he embraces the call for adventure -- which is the complete opposite of a bureaucrat. A bureaucrat exists purely to seek comfort. Building a padded world around him without achieving a thing. Once a bureaucrat is born, its only goal is to feather its nest before it dies. But Musk is the enemy of comfort. Which is weird for a billionaire. In fact, it makes being a billionaire the least interesting thing about him. He realizes that becoming comfortable with life makes you a menace to everyone else, because when you have no challenges you use that time to infringe on others, like a bureaucrat. Do bureaucrats ever learn from failure? No. They avoid failure by avoiding everything -- everything worthwhile. So when they see someone who chases a challenge, they resent him. They've given up on their dreams, so they expect you to do the same. For Musk, its about failure more than success. Failure becomes the next challenge which becomes the next opportunity which leads to wisdom. Compare that to those who despise him. They say it's over political beliefs but its far deeper. They don't have faith in themselves and they hate those who do. Now they could be inspired by him, but its easier to envy him and become an obstacle to the achievement of others. But look -- you don't need to agree with him. It's a free country. You have the right to talk back to him or anybody else. But when you try to stifle scientific progress because you hate a candidate, you're not the good guys. Maybe it should be you we're launching into space. 👏👏👏

Autism Capital 🧩

1,907,481 views • 1 year ago

How Jeffrey Epstein rose from maths nerd, to a financial fixer for elites, to the boss of blackmail: ‘If you look at Epstein’s operation, what it looks like to me is that it’s a criminal operation on a number of different levels. Epstein is an interesting case because where does he come from? Well, he doesn’t come from a wealthy family. He doesn’t come from an influential family. He was a Long Island kid who was good at mathematics…he was a kind of smart, nerdy kid who made friends by doing their math homework. You’re not popular because you’re a jock. You’re not popular necessarily because you’re that good-looking or you dance well. You’re popular because you can do other people’s math homework and get them to pass. His whole career is ingratiating himself to wealthy, powerful people. What did he do as a financial advisor? Look at it. Just stand back and look at what he did. And what he did was that he helped them dodge taxes. He also helped them hide money. He could help people discover money that had been hidden abroad. He could help them hide money. If you do one, you can do the other. And that’s how he moved as a kind of fixer and arranger into the realm of the rich and powerful. And in that process, either he or other people who were working with him found out that these people can be compromised in a number of ways. And so then you start installing cameras in your residences, in the bedrooms and the bathrooms. There’s only one reason you do that. It’s fairly simple. The only reason why you collect all of this video information on your rich and powerful friends is to potentially use it as leverage against them. You don’t have to actually use it. You simply have to make them aware that you have it and could use it.’ -Prof. Richard Spence on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW:

How Jeffrey Epstein rose from maths nerd, to a financial fixer for elites, to the boss of blackmail: ‘If you look at Epstein’s operation, what it looks like to me is that it’s a criminal operation on a number of different levels. Epstein is an interesting case because where does he come from? Well, he doesn’t come from a wealthy family. He doesn’t come from an influential family. He was a Long Island kid who was good at mathematics…he was a kind of smart, nerdy kid who made friends by doing their math homework. You’re not popular because you’re a jock. You’re not popular necessarily because you’re that good-looking or you dance well. You’re popular because you can do other people’s math homework and get them to pass. His whole career is ingratiating himself to wealthy, powerful people. What did he do as a financial advisor? Look at it. Just stand back and look at what he did. And what he did was that he helped them dodge taxes. He also helped them hide money. He could help people discover money that had been hidden abroad. He could help them hide money. If you do one, you can do the other. And that’s how he moved as a kind of fixer and arranger into the realm of the rich and powerful. And in that process, either he or other people who were working with him found out that these people can be compromised in a number of ways. And so then you start installing cameras in your residences, in the bedrooms and the bathrooms. There’s only one reason you do that. It’s fairly simple. The only reason why you collect all of this video information on your rich and powerful friends is to potentially use it as leverage against them. You don’t have to actually use it. You simply have to make them aware that you have it and could use it.’ -Prof. Richard Spence on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW:

Going Underground

68,766 views • 8 months ago

Guapdad 4000 speaks on the Revenge of the Dreamers 3 sessions, saying they were extremely competitive: “This sht was brutal…Everybody was humbled…All of the songs had 30 other mfs on them [that got taken off]… You had to be the best of the best. You had to believe that you were, and you had to perform that way, or you wouldn’t make the song… Is you one of them ones? Kendrick and Drake had to do it. Cole had to do it. Wale had to do it. They had to separate themselves from that whole other pack” Via Christian Baltazar / It Can’t Be That Bad podcast

Guapdad 4000 speaks on the Revenge of the Dreamers 3 sessions, saying they were extremely competitive: “This sht was brutal…Everybody was humbled…All of the songs had 30 other mfs on them [that got taken off]… You had to be the best of the best. You had to believe that you were, and you had to perform that way, or you wouldn’t make the song… Is you one of them ones? Kendrick and Drake had to do it. Cole had to do it. Wale had to do it. They had to separate themselves from that whole other pack” Via Christian Baltazar / It Can’t Be That Bad podcast

Joey

73,592 views • 2 months ago

Former CIA Director John Brennan says the CIA pays people to be spies and then blackmails them He doesn’t consider it “Blackmail” because it’s about “National Security” “It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about” “Agents, the people that you recruit, foreign citizens, if they are hesitant to continue to spy for you, you can remind them that when they were first recruited and they signed a sheet of paper saying that they had taken some money from us, which is usually what happens, that you could remind them about that almost as a way to scare them into continuing to work with you. So the pressure — It sounds like blackmail — It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about. You have to do whatever you can in order to keep people working for the CIA.”

Former CIA Director John Brennan says the CIA pays people to be spies and then blackmails them He doesn’t consider it “Blackmail” because it’s about “National Security” “It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about” “Agents, the people that you recruit, foreign citizens, if they are hesitant to continue to spy for you, you can remind them that when they were first recruited and they signed a sheet of paper saying that they had taken some money from us, which is usually what happens, that you could remind them about that almost as a way to scare them into continuing to work with you. So the pressure — It sounds like blackmail — It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about. You have to do whatever you can in order to keep people working for the CIA.”

Wall Street Apes

343,588 views • 8 months ago

Johnson: Anyone who has been made to suffer because of the health services you rely upon or the food and nutrition supplement for your family, anyone who is hurting, you have a home in the Republican party. You have people here who were elected by their constituents to come do their job and they do it. They are voting to support you

Johnson: Anyone who has been made to suffer because of the health services you rely upon or the food and nutrition supplement for your family, anyone who is hurting, you have a home in the Republican party. You have people here who were elected by their constituents to come do their job and they do it. They are voting to support you

Acyn

530,439 views • 9 months ago

"There was a beautiful study done by the Nordic countries. They probably have the best capture of medical data from how they run their health care systems and their electronic medical record. And so, they published this in JAMA Cardiology, and it was 23 million people. And they looked at their vaccination status by age, sex, which vaccine they got, how many did they get, did they get one of one and one of the other. …What they found was that the unvaccinated have the lowest amount of myocarditis. If you had one Pfizer, you had more than if you were unvaccinated. If you had two Pfizer, you had even more. If you had one Moderna, it was more. If you had two Moderna, it was even more. And if you mixed them, it seemed even higher. All of these were above what we saw with the unvaccinated. So, that sort of answers the question: which is worse, to be unvaccinated or vaccinated? For myocarditis, it was worse to be vaccinated." Kirk Milhoan Independent Medical Alliance

"There was a beautiful study done by the Nordic countries. They probably have the best capture of medical data from how they run their health care systems and their electronic medical record. And so, they published this in JAMA Cardiology, and it was 23 million people. And they looked at their vaccination status by age, sex, which vaccine they got, how many did they get, did they get one of one and one of the other. …What they found was that the unvaccinated have the lowest amount of myocarditis. If you had one Pfizer, you had more than if you were unvaccinated. If you had two Pfizer, you had even more. If you had one Moderna, it was more. If you had two Moderna, it was even more. And if you mixed them, it seemed even higher. All of these were above what we saw with the unvaccinated. So, that sort of answers the question: which is worse, to be unvaccinated or vaccinated? For myocarditis, it was worse to be vaccinated." Kirk Milhoan Independent Medical Alliance

Jan Jekielek

75,498 views • 1 year ago

🚨 CURRY: "The media is trying to say 'We need a Joe Rogan on the left.' You basically had one but you were so crazy that Joe started to think right." ROGAN: "They didn't want me. That's the psyop working against them. In the past they could take someone like me and demonize them and it would be effective and they could just remove you from the airwaves because you didn't play by the rules. Now people say that I'm telling the truth and then they'll stop listening to CNN and faith in them crashes and faith in mainstream media crashes and faith in podcasts rises." CURRY: "They'll probably try to hype someone up to be the Joe Rogan of the left. ROGAN: "They already are." CURRY: "Who do you think it is?" ROGAN: "Who cares. Let them try. It won't work. They don't have authenticity. When you listen to someone long enough you see if they're real. I don't lie. A lot of these people are propagandists. They try to make arguments without looking at the other side. I always try to look at the other side. It's an important quality for a person broadcasting to millions of people and also for a human being."

🚨 CURRY: "The media is trying to say 'We need a Joe Rogan on the left.' You basically had one but you were so crazy that Joe started to think right." ROGAN: "They didn't want me. That's the psyop working against them. In the past they could take someone like me and demonize them and it would be effective and they could just remove you from the airwaves because you didn't play by the rules. Now people say that I'm telling the truth and then they'll stop listening to CNN and faith in them crashes and faith in mainstream media crashes and faith in podcasts rises." CURRY: "They'll probably try to hype someone up to be the Joe Rogan of the left. ROGAN: "They already are." CURRY: "Who do you think it is?" ROGAN: "Who cares. Let them try. It won't work. They don't have authenticity. When you listen to someone long enough you see if they're real. I don't lie. A lot of these people are propagandists. They try to make arguments without looking at the other side. I always try to look at the other side. It's an important quality for a person broadcasting to millions of people and also for a human being."

Autism Capital 🧩

8,317,001 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "It's not the first time we have had people deported. It's just that the media has suddenly woken up to this story because Mr Trump has done it a bit quicker than people expected. But already last year, under the Biden Administration, were over 1100 Indians being deported back. If you are illegally in the US, the US has the right to deport you and if your identity as an Indian is confirmed then India has an obligation to accept you. So, in both cases there really isn't very much debate. However, it wasn't good to hear that they were brought back forcibly in a military plane and handcuffed and so on. That was quite unnecessary. It should have been enough to put them on a commercial aircraft or civilian aeroplane and send them back. If you want to do a mass deportation, do in civilian charters. That would have been the more humane thing to do. They may have broken your laws by coming in to your country but by and large they have no bad intentions, they are not criminals, they are not convicted of anything else. They are there to make a better life for themselves which they have done by violating your laws sp you can send them out. But handcuffing and putting them in a military aircraft and sending them in this way, I think India should say that this is not entirely advisable..."

#WATCH | Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "It's not the first time we have had people deported. It's just that the media has suddenly woken up to this story because Mr Trump has done it a bit quicker than people expected. But already last year, under the Biden Administration, were over 1100 Indians being deported back. If you are illegally in the US, the US has the right to deport you and if your identity as an Indian is confirmed then India has an obligation to accept you. So, in both cases there really isn't very much debate. However, it wasn't good to hear that they were brought back forcibly in a military plane and handcuffed and so on. That was quite unnecessary. It should have been enough to put them on a commercial aircraft or civilian aeroplane and send them back. If you want to do a mass deportation, do in civilian charters. That would have been the more humane thing to do. They may have broken your laws by coming in to your country but by and large they have no bad intentions, they are not criminals, they are not convicted of anything else. They are there to make a better life for themselves which they have done by violating your laws sp you can send them out. But handcuffing and putting them in a military aircraft and sending them in this way, I think India should say that this is not entirely advisable..."

ANI

58,038 views • 1 year ago

Derek Jeter shares a truth about failure that most people don't want to hear. "Failure is essential. If I can promise you one thing for certain, you will fail. I wouldn't have had the success without the failures." Failure isn't the opposite of success - it's part of the path to it. Successful people don't avoid adversity. They expect it. They know that they must learn from the setbacks and challenges. You can't avoid failure - you have to be relentless in your pursuits and refuse to let it stop you. Failure isn't a destination - it's a checkpoint. It's where growth begins. (🎥 MLive)

Derek Jeter shares a truth about failure that most people don't want to hear. "Failure is essential. If I can promise you one thing for certain, you will fail. I wouldn't have had the success without the failures." Failure isn't the opposite of success - it's part of the path to it. Successful people don't avoid adversity. They expect it. They know that they must learn from the setbacks and challenges. You can't avoid failure - you have to be relentless in your pursuits and refuse to let it stop you. Failure isn't a destination - it's a checkpoint. It's where growth begins. (🎥 MLive)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

104,073 views • 7 months ago

Mikel Arteta’s beautiful praise to his staff and players. “That's when you have a difficult period. I think the best thing that you can do instead of talk a lot is observe. Look around you and see how people react. How they talk, how they look at you, how they judge you, what they do. Do they look at themselves, do they start to criticise other people? “Look around and you're going to learn the environment and the people that you have around you. “I cannot be prouder to work in a club with people that the only thing they could do is ask, what else can I do to help? “When you have people like this, I don't know if it's gonna take another week or two, but something good it will happen at the end because we deserve it.”

Mikel Arteta’s beautiful praise to his staff and players. “That's when you have a difficult period. I think the best thing that you can do instead of talk a lot is observe. Look around you and see how people react. How they talk, how they look at you, how they judge you, what they do. Do they look at themselves, do they start to criticise other people? “Look around and you're going to learn the environment and the people that you have around you. “I cannot be prouder to work in a club with people that the only thing they could do is ask, what else can I do to help? “When you have people like this, I don't know if it's gonna take another week or two, but something good it will happen at the end because we deserve it.”

Connor Humm

48,588 views • 4 months ago

Wayne Rooney claims playing for Man United is MUCH harder than playing for Arsenal or Chelsea. “Man United, and I can't stress this enough, is a different club to other clubs. So when you, the names you just mentioned there, Lewis Hall, Ollie Watkins, for instance, whoever, I don't know them personally. When you're recruiting for Man United, the level of detail to go into that recruitment, which I don't think has been there over the last 10 years, I don't think it's been good enough. Alex Ferguson was a master at doing it. He'd do it himself.” And to be able to play for Man United is so much more difficult than it is to be able to play for a Chelsea or Arsenal, 100%. Liverpool probably is the closest to Man United with the history of the football club. But to play for Man United, to deal with everything else, the football is a small part of it. Whether you like it or not, it is a small part of it. To deal with everything else which goes on at the football club, with the media, the scrutiny on being a Man United player.” “So you have to get that recruitment right. I don't know whether Lewis Hall is good enough. You don't know whether Lewis-Skelly is good enough. You don't know if Ollie Watkins is mentally strong enough to deal with that. So you have to go into players' backgrounds. You have to go into where they're from, what's the upbringing, and is he strong enough to deal with this pressure?” “So there's so much detail which goes into it. That's why I think previously, with players Man United have brought in, some of them have crumbled. Some of them have not been able to deal with that.”

Wayne Rooney claims playing for Man United is MUCH harder than playing for Arsenal or Chelsea. “Man United, and I can't stress this enough, is a different club to other clubs. So when you, the names you just mentioned there, Lewis Hall, Ollie Watkins, for instance, whoever, I don't know them personally. When you're recruiting for Man United, the level of detail to go into that recruitment, which I don't think has been there over the last 10 years, I don't think it's been good enough. Alex Ferguson was a master at doing it. He'd do it himself.” And to be able to play for Man United is so much more difficult than it is to be able to play for a Chelsea or Arsenal, 100%. Liverpool probably is the closest to Man United with the history of the football club. But to play for Man United, to deal with everything else, the football is a small part of it. Whether you like it or not, it is a small part of it. To deal with everything else which goes on at the football club, with the media, the scrutiny on being a Man United player.” “So you have to get that recruitment right. I don't know whether Lewis Hall is good enough. You don't know whether Lewis-Skelly is good enough. You don't know if Ollie Watkins is mentally strong enough to deal with that. So you have to go into players' backgrounds. You have to go into where they're from, what's the upbringing, and is he strong enough to deal with this pressure?” “So there's so much detail which goes into it. That's why I think previously, with players Man United have brought in, some of them have crumbled. Some of them have not been able to deal with that.”

HK

77,251 views • 2 days ago

Let me explain why I have such fervor for the Patriots during the War for Independence by placing you into the seat of history. Place yourselves in the shoes of a Virginian planter, who just got told that the land you personally put your blood, sweat and tears surveying during which you nearly died, then fighting the French and savages over over where you also had comrades in arms die, nearly died yourself again, well all that land you fought over is actually not going to be yours to settle, it’s actually going to become an Indian buffer state given right back into the hands of the savages you just got done fighting it for. And if you want any of it, you want to use any of it, the land you personally surveyed, the land you fought to keep, you’re going to have to negotiate with parliament for any change in boundaries or for any legal usage of it. Then, on top of that, you now get direct taxes levied against you by that same parliament that says you don’t get to use that land, which itself was largely unprecedented as prior to this any acts which Parliament had undertaken were relegated primarily to international commerce which, understandably, they would get to regulate as it concerned the empire as a whole rather than the internal colonial affairs. But now they’re taxing you. To pay for the war you just paid for in the blood you spilt of the enemies of the crown and the bodies of your fellow Virginians left behind in the wilderness. And this is again, pretty much unprecedented. They’d passed a few silly laws in the past but hardly anyone even remembers them because they went totally unenforced because of how ridiculous they were. Telling people they can’t make hats? Telling people they can’t make their own iron tools? All absurd, and so they went completely disregarded. But now they actually are trying to enforce these things. So you work against it, protesting it, pushing back against it in the houses you have, your own legislatures at home. A Legislature, the house burgesses, which you yourself are a member of. And eventually it becomes so untenable they rescind it. Then, that very same day, that same parliament passes a law declaring that they are the supreme authority over you, in all matters, in all affairs, that whatever they say goes and your own legislatures are all subordinate to them. And there is no recourse for you. You don’t get any representatives of your own. You have no political representation, even though you are, again, a member of the house burgesses, modeled directly off of the English Parliament. In spite of that fact that you own 5,500 acres of land, that you are profiting 2000 British Pounds a year, when an English county only required land in evaluation of 2 pounds to vote, in spite of the fact that you have 1000x as much value as that tiny freeholding yeoman, that yeoman got to have more political say over the course of your life than you did. Because he got to at least vote, which was entirely denied to you. And of course it was. You were 3000 miles away. It would be untenable to have your lands be considered as English counties and send your representatives across the ocean back and forth to cast votes in Parliament. That's why you had the house of burgesses in the first place. Because the ancient charter struck between King James I and the first men of Virginia 150 years prior said quite clearly that they, and all their descendants, which was to say you, were to receive all liberties, immunities, and franchises that you would have had had you been born an England. That you were to be treated equally. There is no world where this situation could ever be construed as honoring the very agreement which set this forth in the first place as equal, when you no longer even had a vote in what laws might be passed over you, and that Parliament could now do whatever it wanted. A parliament which had just denied you the lands that you surveyed, that you fought for. And then as a thank you for the blood you shed, taxed you and rendered you as lesser than an English peasant with a few acres. And all of that, that's what it was to have been George Washington prior to the War for Independence. It is a testimony to his grace, goodwill, temperament, and character as a gentleman that it took him a decade to start killing people over this horrific miscarriage of justice. And to try to claim that because your gross twisting of the letter of a law in total violation of the spirit means somehow, you were the bad guy in all of this, is incredibly offensive in how terrible a read of history it is.

Let me explain why I have such fervor for the Patriots during the War for Independence by placing you into the seat of history. Place yourselves in the shoes of a Virginian planter, who just got told that the land you personally put your blood, sweat and tears surveying during which you nearly died, then fighting the French and savages over over where you also had comrades in arms die, nearly died yourself again, well all that land you fought over is actually not going to be yours to settle, it’s actually going to become an Indian buffer state given right back into the hands of the savages you just got done fighting it for. And if you want any of it, you want to use any of it, the land you personally surveyed, the land you fought to keep, you’re going to have to negotiate with parliament for any change in boundaries or for any legal usage of it. Then, on top of that, you now get direct taxes levied against you by that same parliament that says you don’t get to use that land, which itself was largely unprecedented as prior to this any acts which Parliament had undertaken were relegated primarily to international commerce which, understandably, they would get to regulate as it concerned the empire as a whole rather than the internal colonial affairs. But now they’re taxing you. To pay for the war you just paid for in the blood you spilt of the enemies of the crown and the bodies of your fellow Virginians left behind in the wilderness. And this is again, pretty much unprecedented. They’d passed a few silly laws in the past but hardly anyone even remembers them because they went totally unenforced because of how ridiculous they were. Telling people they can’t make hats? Telling people they can’t make their own iron tools? All absurd, and so they went completely disregarded. But now they actually are trying to enforce these things. So you work against it, protesting it, pushing back against it in the houses you have, your own legislatures at home. A Legislature, the house burgesses, which you yourself are a member of. And eventually it becomes so untenable they rescind it. Then, that very same day, that same parliament passes a law declaring that they are the supreme authority over you, in all matters, in all affairs, that whatever they say goes and your own legislatures are all subordinate to them. And there is no recourse for you. You don’t get any representatives of your own. You have no political representation, even though you are, again, a member of the house burgesses, modeled directly off of the English Parliament. In spite of that fact that you own 5,500 acres of land, that you are profiting 2000 British Pounds a year, when an English county only required land in evaluation of 2 pounds to vote, in spite of the fact that you have 1000x as much value as that tiny freeholding yeoman, that yeoman got to have more political say over the course of your life than you did. Because he got to at least vote, which was entirely denied to you. And of course it was. You were 3000 miles away. It would be untenable to have your lands be considered as English counties and send your representatives across the ocean back and forth to cast votes in Parliament. That's why you had the house of burgesses in the first place. Because the ancient charter struck between King James I and the first men of Virginia 150 years prior said quite clearly that they, and all their descendants, which was to say you, were to receive all liberties, immunities, and franchises that you would have had had you been born an England. That you were to be treated equally. There is no world where this situation could ever be construed as honoring the very agreement which set this forth in the first place as equal, when you no longer even had a vote in what laws might be passed over you, and that Parliament could now do whatever it wanted. A parliament which had just denied you the lands that you surveyed, that you fought for. And then as a thank you for the blood you shed, taxed you and rendered you as lesser than an English peasant with a few acres. And all of that, that's what it was to have been George Washington prior to the War for Independence. It is a testimony to his grace, goodwill, temperament, and character as a gentleman that it took him a decade to start killing people over this horrific miscarriage of justice. And to try to claim that because your gross twisting of the letter of a law in total violation of the spirit means somehow, you were the bad guy in all of this, is incredibly offensive in how terrible a read of history it is.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

104,140 views • 5 days ago

$I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.$

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

16,502 views • 3 months ago

Generally, people only berate and insult their perceived superiors. People don't punch down emotionally. Haters only hate up. For instance, almost nobody would use the R-word to insult someone they think is actually mentally challenged or less intelligent than themselves. It's a projection meant to tear you down because (at least deep down) they feel you are above them. They only want to desperately tear you down and only find comfort in the thought of tearing you down because they want to reduce to their level because they see you as higher up. Haters only hate the great, or at least the ones they secretly see as great. When someone goes out of their way to insult you, ridicule you, or hate on you, think to yourself (if not say outloud to them), "thank you for the compliments ☺️ " And if it was some kind of argument or debate, remember: once the ad hominems and personal attacks start the debate has been one and is thus over. So be a gracious winner and move on politely, because the insulter has forfeited. Have compassion. Haters and insulters have very low self-esteem. That's why they hate and insult.

Generally, people only berate and insult their perceived superiors. People don't punch down emotionally. Haters only hate up. For instance, almost nobody would use the R-word to insult someone they think is actually mentally challenged or less intelligent than themselves. It's a projection meant to tear you down because (at least deep down) they feel you are above them. They only want to desperately tear you down and only find comfort in the thought of tearing you down because they want to reduce to their level because they see you as higher up. Haters only hate the great, or at least the ones they secretly see as great. When someone goes out of their way to insult you, ridicule you, or hate on you, think to yourself (if not say outloud to them), "thank you for the compliments ☺️ " And if it was some kind of argument or debate, remember: once the ad hominems and personal attacks start the debate has been one and is thus over. So be a gracious winner and move on politely, because the insulter has forfeited. Have compassion. Haters and insulters have very low self-esteem. That's why they hate and insult.

Eckhart Aurelius Hughes

16,294 views • 1 year ago

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

11,811 views • 9 months ago

I have been preaching 📌 As a man, you're above your woman which means you're her God on earth. So how do you expect her to see you when you're constantly lamenting to her about your problems? Women are hypergamous by nature, which is why they settle for men who are better than them because they see them in a position to lead and solve all their problems. Imagine God who you expect to solve your problem complaining to you about his problems, will you see him the same? It's not as if telling her your problems will do anything. Afterall, most men marry women from poor homes who have nothing to offer. So what exactly will crying to her do for you? Stop crying out to a woman or telling her your problems. All you're doing is making her lose attraction for you. You have male friends, so you can tell them your problems. Only them will understand you better without looking down on you.

I have been preaching 📌 As a man, you're above your woman which means you're her God on earth. So how do you expect her to see you when you're constantly lamenting to her about your problems? Women are hypergamous by nature, which is why they settle for men who are better than them because they see them in a position to lead and solve all their problems. Imagine God who you expect to solve your problem complaining to you about his problems, will you see him the same? It's not as if telling her your problems will do anything. Afterall, most men marry women from poor homes who have nothing to offer. So what exactly will crying to her do for you? Stop crying out to a woman or telling her your problems. All you're doing is making her lose attraction for you. You have male friends, so you can tell them your problems. Only them will understand you better without looking down on you.

KING CHIDI

195,862 views • 8 days ago