Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Q: Is the intelligence correct or is the intelligence wrong? TRUMP: Well, the intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says 'We don't know, it could've been very severe' ... you'd think a media outlet would say, isn't that a great thing?

Aaron Rupar

981,775 subscribers

199,958 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Komedi

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Yorum

Jo profil fotoğrafı

Jo1 yıl önce

And this is why they cancelled their House briefing folks.

Mobile Scanner profil fotoğrafı

Mobile Scanner1 yıl önce

Scan any documents, convert images into text, PDF files, etc. 👍

𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐢 profil fotoğrafı

𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐢1 yıl önce

So the intelligence was very inconclusive, but he just claimed it was the same thing as Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Montrey profil fotoğrafı

Montrey1 yıl önce

In other words: Trump doesn't care what the secret service says, if he wants to do something, he just does it.

GroundChuck profil fotoğrafı

GroundChuck1 yıl önce

There’s clearly zero intelligence

Jo profil fotoğrafı

Jo1 yıl önce

What papers don’t they need? The intelligence report?

New Age Democrat profil fotoğrafı

New Age Democrat1 yıl önce

"Why won't they praise me" 😂😂😂

greg cantwell profil fotoğrafı

greg cantwell1 yıl önce

It’s problematic that we can’t believe anything he says.

Jhoff10 profil fotoğrafı

Jhoff101 yıl önce

Ok so he’s admitting they don’t know.

forestfromtrees profil fotoğrafı

forestfromtrees1 yıl önce

Translation - Whatever the hell happened doesn't matter as long as it looks like a win for me.

New Yorker 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🍁🌻🟦 profil fotoğrafı

New Yorker 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🍁🌻🟦1 yıl önce

trump talking about intelligence is a classic oxymoron.

Benzer Videolar

Trump: "The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know. It could have been very severe. That's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct. But I think we can take the we don't know. It was very severe. It was obliteration."

Trump: "The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don't know. It could have been very severe. That's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct. But I think we can take the we don't know. It was very severe. It was obliteration."

The Bulwark

1,162,226 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

On US strikes in Iran, President Trump has cited Israeli intelligence after saying preliminary US intel was "inconclusive." I asked him if he's relying on Israeli intelligence. "No, this is also Iran made this statement and if you read the document that was given...the document said it could be very severe damage. But they didn't take that. They said it could be limited or it could be very severe..."

On US strikes in Iran, President Trump has cited Israeli intelligence after saying preliminary US intel was "inconclusive." I asked him if he's relying on Israeli intelligence. "No, this is also Iran made this statement and if you read the document that was given...the document said it could be very severe damage. But they didn't take that. They said it could be limited or it could be very severe..."

Kaitlan Collins

138,157 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Trump: Artificial intelligence… A lot of people don't know what it is. It is hot, very big.

Trump: Artificial intelligence… A lot of people don't know what it is. It is hot, very big.

Acyn

409,708 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

BREAKING: A French media report says Ukrainian intelligence stopped sharing high-value intelligence with the U.S. after concluding American leaks were reaching Moscow, citing a severe breakdown of trust during the Trump administration. The claim is attributed to senior Ukrainian intelligence leaders. Between this and the Greenland mess, can we just impeach Trump already?

BREAKING: A French media report says Ukrainian intelligence stopped sharing high-value intelligence with the U.S. after concluding American leaks were reaching Moscow, citing a severe breakdown of trust during the Trump administration. The claim is attributed to senior Ukrainian intelligence leaders. Between this and the Greenland mess, can we just impeach Trump already?

Ed Krassenstein

1,849,714 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Okay, this is actually insane Recent UnitedHealthcare lawsuit reveals that the company KNOWINGLY has been using faulty artificial intelligence to deny claims to increase profitability. The AI they’ve been using HAS A 90% INACCURACY RATE “The company knowingly used artificial intelligence. That that was faulty. That's where this comes out of. It comes out of litigation” “Separate litigation that they knowingly used faulty artificial intelligence to deny claims that were legitimate to increase profitability. That is a big deal. — This is very, very overt artificial intelligence tool with 90% inaccuracy” “It's a sinister thing.”

Okay, this is actually insane Recent UnitedHealthcare lawsuit reveals that the company KNOWINGLY has been using faulty artificial intelligence to deny claims to increase profitability. The AI they’ve been using HAS A 90% INACCURACY RATE “The company knowingly used artificial intelligence. That that was faulty. That's where this comes out of. It comes out of litigation” “Separate litigation that they knowingly used faulty artificial intelligence to deny claims that were legitimate to increase profitability. That is a big deal. — This is very, very overt artificial intelligence tool with 90% inaccuracy” “It's a sinister thing.”

Wall Street Apes

461,093 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨🚨🚨A French media report says Ukrainian intelligence stopped sharing high-value intelligence with the U.S. after concluding American leaks were reaching Moscow, citing a severe breakdown of trust during the Trump administration. The claim is attributed to senior Ukrainian intelligence leaders🚨🚨🚨

🚨🚨🚨A French media report says Ukrainian intelligence stopped sharing high-value intelligence with the U.S. after concluding American leaks were reaching Moscow, citing a severe breakdown of trust during the Trump administration. The claim is attributed to senior Ukrainian intelligence leaders🚨🚨🚨

Bricktop_NAFO

47,393 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Pakistan’s enemies know very well that our intelligence agencies are their worst nightmare. Outstanding work by the Intelligence Bureau, truly commendable performance.

Pakistan’s enemies know very well that our intelligence agencies are their worst nightmare. Outstanding work by the Intelligence Bureau, truly commendable performance.

War Analyst

44,162 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Dan Bongino: "Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East…. I don't know which country though." What country in the Middle East has the most capable intelligence agency to run a blackmail operation in the United States? I think we all have our suspicions… the fact is a foreign nation(s), intelligence agency, was in cahoots with our intelligence agencies (CIA). That should be called out..

Dan Bongino: "Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East…. I don't know which country though." What country in the Middle East has the most capable intelligence agency to run a blackmail operation in the United States? I think we all have our suspicions… the fact is a foreign nation(s), intelligence agency, was in cahoots with our intelligence agencies (CIA). That should be called out..

MJTruthUltra

23,160 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Tucker: 'Iran tried to assassinate Trump' intelligence CAME FROM ISRAEL Why can't we see the 'intelligence? Or is like the WMDs in a test tube?

Tucker: 'Iran tried to assassinate Trump' intelligence CAME FROM ISRAEL Why can't we see the 'intelligence? Or is like the WMDs in a test tube?

RT

185,518 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just CLOWNED CNN's Kaitlan Collins. He never misses. TRUMP: "Go ahead. Oh, fake news CNN? Ayayai, here we go. Wait 'til you hear this question. You should REALLY say how great our soldiers and warriors are." COLLINS: "Are you relying on Israeli intelligence [that says the strikes were effective] for your assessment of the impact of the strikes?" TRUMP: "No. Also Iran made the statement. Also, if you read the document that was given [to CNN], it said it could be very severe damage, but they didn't take that. They said it COULD be limited or it COULD be very severe." "They really didn't know other than to say it could be limited or it could be very, very severe. And YOU didn't choose to put that. Since then, we've collected additional intelligence." "We've also spoken to people who have seen the site and the site is OBLITERATED, and we think everything nuclear is down there. They didn't [remove] it."

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just CLOWNED CNN's Kaitlan Collins. He never misses. TRUMP: "Go ahead. Oh, fake news CNN? Ayayai, here we go. Wait 'til you hear this question. You should REALLY say how great our soldiers and warriors are." COLLINS: "Are you relying on Israeli intelligence [that says the strikes were effective] for your assessment of the impact of the strikes?" TRUMP: "No. Also Iran made the statement. Also, if you read the document that was given [to CNN], it said it could be very severe damage, but they didn't take that. They said it COULD be limited or it COULD be very severe." "They really didn't know other than to say it could be limited or it could be very, very severe. And YOU didn't choose to put that. Since then, we've collected additional intelligence." "We've also spoken to people who have seen the site and the site is OBLITERATED, and we think everything nuclear is down there. They didn't [remove] it."

Eric Daugherty

3,007,037 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Reporter asks about Iran building a nuclear weapon: "Your intelligence community has said they have no evidence that they are at this point. Pres. Trump: Well then my intel community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that? Q: Tulsi Gabard. Trump: She's wrong.

Reporter asks about Iran building a nuclear weapon: "Your intelligence community has said they have no evidence that they are at this point. Pres. Trump: Well then my intel community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that? Q: Tulsi Gabard. Trump: She's wrong.

CSPAN

69,986 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NBC: Your intelligence community has said they have no evidence that they are at this point. POTUS: Well, then my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that? NBC: Your Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. POTUS: She's wrong.

NBC: Your intelligence community has said they have no evidence that they are at this point. POTUS: Well, then my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that? NBC: Your Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. POTUS: She's wrong.

Vaughn Hillyard

27,917 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

President Donald Trump said that the damage to Iranian nuclear sites from missile strikes over the weekend was severe, though he also acknowledged that the available intelligence on the matter was inconclusive

President Donald Trump said that the damage to Iranian nuclear sites from missile strikes over the weekend was severe, though he also acknowledged that the available intelligence on the matter was inconclusive

Reuters

47,216 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Q: The DNI concluded in March that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. So what new intelligence does the US have since then that Iran changed its position? HEGSETH: The president has made it very clear that he's looked at all the intelligence and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat

Q: The DNI concluded in March that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. So what new intelligence does the US have since then that Iran changed its position? HEGSETH: The president has made it very clear that he's looked at all the intelligence and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat

Aaron Rupar

235,739 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Terence Tao says intelligence is not a straight line from subhuman to superhuman, where humans become irrelevant Instead, a 'Copernican view of intelligence' fits better — just as Earth is not the center of the universe, human intelligence is not the center of all cognition "we need to think beyond what humans or computers can do alone"

Terence Tao says intelligence is not a straight line from subhuman to superhuman, where humans become irrelevant Instead, a 'Copernican view of intelligence' fits better — just as Earth is not the center of the universe, human intelligence is not the center of all cognition "we need to think beyond what humans or computers can do alone"

Haider.

33,228 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

$ELON: HUMAN INTELLIGENCE WILL BE DWARFED BY MACHINE INTELLIGENCE “Human intelligence, I think, will be dwarfed by machine intelligence. I'm not sure how to feel about that, except that it appears to be inevitable that at some point, human intelligence will be a very small fraction of total intelligence. Digital intelligence will be more than 99% of all intelligence in the future. So, hopefully, the computers are nice to us.” Source: Dubai World Government Summit, February 13, 2025 Elon Musk$

ELON: HUMAN INTELLIGENCE WILL BE DWARFED BY MACHINE INTELLIGENCE “Human intelligence, I think, will be dwarfed by machine intelligence. I'm not sure how to feel about that, except that it appears to be inevitable that at some point, human intelligence will be a very small fraction of total intelligence. Digital intelligence will be more than 99% of all intelligence in the future. So, hopefully, the computers are nice to us.” Source: Dubai World Government Summit, February 13, 2025 Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

113,484 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The men and women of the U.S. Intelligence community honor their oaths by collecting the vital intelligence that keeps our fellow Americans safe. The global threats we face require a Director of National Intelligence who would do the same. Tulsi Gabbard is not that person.

The men and women of the U.S. Intelligence community honor their oaths by collecting the vital intelligence that keeps our fellow Americans safe. The global threats we face require a Director of National Intelligence who would do the same. Tulsi Gabbard is not that person.

Archive: Rep. Abigail Spanberger

976,475 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Big Brain AI

117,778 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

JUST IN: President Trump says Iran is weeks or months away from having a nuclear weapon, says Tulsi Gabbard is “wrong.” Reporter: What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a weapon? Your intel community said they have no evidence. Trump: My intelligence community is wrong. Who said that? Reporter: Gabbard. Trump: She is wrong.

JUST IN: President Trump says Iran is weeks or months away from having a nuclear weapon, says Tulsi Gabbard is “wrong.” Reporter: What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a weapon? Your intel community said they have no evidence. Trump: My intelligence community is wrong. Who said that? Reporter: Gabbard. Trump: She is wrong.

Collin Rugg

303,887 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce